Effect of Medial or Lateral Graft Failure on Graft Volume and Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND: Graft failure is a common complication after superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). The graft in SCR is fixed on the greater tuberosity and superior glenoid, and graft failure has been reported on both sides. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical manifestations of patients with graft failure after SCR and identify the clinical and radiological differences between medial and lateral graft failure. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent SCR with a dermal allograft for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears between March 2018 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively. Patients with graft failure were divided into 2 groups: those with lateral graft failure on the greater tuberosity side (group I) and those with medial graft failure on the glenoid side (group II). Patients with intact grafts were included in group III as a control group. Intergroup differences in clinical and radiological characteristics were analyzed, and multiple regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among the 93 patients included, there were 18 patients in group I, 15 in group II, and 60 in group III. Overall, 11 patients (61.1%) in group I and 9 patients (60.0%) in group II had a partial graft rupture at one anchor. The postoperative graft volume was significantly lower in group I than in groups II and III (2514.0 ± 564.3 mm3, 3183.5 ± 547.1 mm3, and 3198.0 ± 584.8 mm3, respectively; P = .002 for group I vs II; P < .001 for group I vs III). The acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was significantly increased at 6 months postoperatively compared with before surgery in group I (6.6 ± 1.6 mm vs 4.3 ± 1.9 mm, respectively; P < .001) and group II (7.4 ± 1.3 mm vs 5.7 ± 1.7 mm, respectively; P = .002). However, group I exhibited a significantly greater decrease in the AHD over time than group II (P < .001) and a significantly lower AHD at the final follow-up than the other groups (P < .001). The postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was significantly lower in group I than in the other groups (P < .001). On multiple regression analysis, fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle, Hamada grade, and graft width were independent factors for lateral graft failure. CONCLUSION: Patients with lateral graft failure had inferior clinical outcomes and lower postoperative graft volumes than those with medial graft failure after SCR using a dermal allograft. The AHD of patients with lateral graft failure improved postoperatively; however, it deteriorated over time.

Importance of hip capsular repair in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the posterior lateral approach: a five year retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the impact of repairing the hip joint capsule during posterior-lateral approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) on postoperative hip joint function and late dislocation incidence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included 413 patients, divided into experimental (hip joint capsule repair, n = 204) and control (hip joint capsule excision, n = 209) groups. Patients were followed for five years, evaluating postoperative hip range of motion (ROM), dislocation rate, VAS and HHS scores, inflammatory and coagulation markers, hospitalization, blood loss, and body composition. Statistical analysis included the Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and logistic regression for dislocation risk factors. RESULTS: Joint capsule repair improved postoperative hip flexion and extension within six months and at two years postoperatively, internal and external rotation within three months, and abduction and adduction throughout the entire follow-up period (P < 0.05). Capsular repair also reduced early and late dislocation rates (P < 0.05). Significant differences in HHS and VAS scores, inflammatory and coagulation indicators, hospitalization, blood loss, and body composition were noted (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression indicated hip joint repair, rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, and sarcopenia as dislocation risk factors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Capsular repair during posterior-lateral THA improves postoperative hip function and mobility while reducing dislocation rates, blood loss, pain, inflammation, and economic burden. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, or sarcopenia require individualized planning and enhanced postoperative care to minimize complications.

Effect of dorsal capsular imbrication on intraoperative DRUJ instability following arthroscopic TFCC repair surgery.

BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical outcomes and identify the ideal indication for implementing dorsal distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) capsular imbrication after triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair in cases of DRUJ instability. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients who underwent arthroscopic TFCC repair between 2016 and 2021. Inclusion criteria comprised a symptomatic ulna fovea sign for over 6 months and dorsal DRUJ subluxation on magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 225 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (135 cases) with a negative ballottement test after "Cross-form TFCC repair" (CR) and Group 2 (90 cases) with a positive ballottement test after "Cross-form TFCC repair" and augmented DRUJ stability through dorsal DRUJ capsular imbrication (CR + DCI). Pain visual analog scale score (VAS), grip strength, modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), wrist range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were assessed for a minimum of 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvements in pain VAS score, grip strength, wrist ROM, MMWS, and PROMs between the preoperative and postoperative periods (all P < 0.05). Recurrent DRUJ instability occurred in 3.7% and 1.1% of patients in the "CR" and "CR + DCI" groups, respectively, with a significant difference. Despite the "CR + DCI" group initially exhibiting inferior ROM compared with the "CR" group, subsequently, no significant difference was noted between them. CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal DRUJ capsular imbrication effectively reduces postoperative DRUJ instability rates, enhances grip strength, and maintains wrist ROM in patients with a positive intra-operative ballottement test after arthroscopic TFCC repair.

Posterior Approach and Inferior Capsulotomy in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison with Superior Capsulotomy.

Background: Hemiarthroplasty is frequently used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, but it has a higher risk of postoperative dislocation. We introduced the posterior approach and inferior capsulotomy (PAICO) to enhance joint stability after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. We evaluated whether the PAICO would have a lower dislocation rate than the conventional posterior approach with superior capsulotomy. Methods: From January 2021 to December 2021, we prospectively recruited 25 patients (25 hips) aged 50 years or older who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures due to low-energy trauma as the PAICO group. We compared the PAICO group with a historical control group who had undergone hemiarthroplasty in 7 institutes between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint was dislocation within 1 year after the surgery. We compared data from the PAICO group with the data from the historical control group from the Korean Hip Fracture Registry which was carried out in South Korea. Results: A total of 25 patients (25 hips) were enrolled in the present study; 3,477 patients (3,571 hips) who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty were reviewed as the historical control group. In the PAICO group, we observed no dislocation, whereas the dislocation rate in the control group was 1.3%. Conclusions: In patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, the PAICO approach demonstrated comparable results in operation time and complication rates when compared to bipolar hemiarthroplasty using superior capsulotomy. Notably, there were no observed cases of dislocation among patients who underwent the PAICO approach. We recommend this PAICO approach to surgeons using the posterior approach, hoping to prevent dislocation in bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Long-term Survivorship and Outcomes of Patients Without Dysplasia Undergoing Capsular Repair During Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature evaluating long-term outcomes and survivorship of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with capsular repair for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). PURPOSE: To report 10-year survivorship and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary hip arthroscopy with capsular repair for FAIS and evaluate the effect of capsular repair in patients at the highest risk for conversion to arthroplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed on all patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with capsular repair between October 2008 and February 2011. Patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up on the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale for pain (VAS) scores were selected. The preoperative and minimum 10-year follow-up Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) scores were also reported, if available. Patients with ipsilateral hip surgery, worker's compensation, Tönnis osteoarthritis grade >1, and hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle <25°) were excluded. Survivorship, PROS, and clinical benefit-minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)-were reported. An additional propensity-matched subanalysis was performed on patients at the highest risk for conversion to arthroplasty, comparing patients undergoing capsular repair to patients with unrepaired capsules. RESULTS: A total of 145 (n = 130 patients) out of 180 eligible hips (n = 165 patients) had a minimum 10-year follow-up (80.6%). Also, 126 hips (86.9%) belonged to women, and 19 hips (13.1%) belonged to men. The mean patient age was 30.3 ± 12.9 years. The survivorship rate was 91% at the 10-year follow-up. The cohort experienced significant improvements (P < .001) in the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and VAS for pain scores. Moreover, the cohort achieved high rates of the PASS for the mHHS (89.8%), high rates of the MCID for the mHHS (82.4%), and high rates of the MCID for VAS for pain (80.6%) scores. In the propensity-matched subanalysis performed on patients with the highest risk for arthroplasty, 29 hips with capsular repair were matched to 81 hips with unrepaired capsules. While both groups experienced significant improvements in all PROs (P < .05), the group without capsule repair trended toward a higher conversion to arthroplasty rate when compared with the repair group. In addition, an odds ratio was calculated for the likelihood of converting to arthroplasty after having an unrepaired capsule compared with capsular repair (2.54 [95% CI, 0.873-7.37]; P = .087). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with capsular repair experienced a high survivorship rate of 91% at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients who did not convert to arthroplasty saw favorable improvements in PROs and achieved high clinical benefit rates. In addition, among those patients at the highest risk for conversion to arthroplasty, a trend toward greater survivorship was observed with capsular repair.

Extended Interportal Capsulotomy for Hip Arthroscopy, a Single-Center Clinical Experience.

Background and Objectives: The number of hip arthroscopy procedures is on the rise worldwide, and awareness regarding proper management of the hip capsule has increased. No capsulotomy shape is agreed upon as a standard approach, with literature supporting both isolated interportal and T-shaped capsulotomies. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to report the clinical results of a standardized extended interportal capsulotomy (EIPC) during hip arthroscopy. Materials and Methods: Patients operated on between 2017 and 2020 with a hip arthroscopy were eligible. The inclusion criteria were ages 18-60 years, failed non-operative treatment, and at least a 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were bilateral femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAS) cases or labral lesions, ipsilateral knee injury, history of ipsilateral hip surgery, and significant spine lesions. Data regarding demographic characteristics such as age, gender, operation date, BMI, but also Beighton score, presence of postoperative pudendal nerve damage, and revision for any reason were gathered from patients' records. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with a visual analog scale (VAS), the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Results: Of the 97 patients operated on with a hip arthroscopy between the defined dates, only 90 patients were included. The mean age was 37.9 ± 9.8, and 58.9% of patients were male. The most frequent surgical indication was an isolated FAS lesion (73.3%), followed by FAS associated with a labral tear (12.2%), an isolated labrum tear (10.0%), synovitis (3.3%), and a loose body (1.1%). The mean follow-up for the study cohort was 39.3 months. The majority of the patients had uneventful surgeries (76.7%), while there were three cases of sciatic nerve neuropraxia and 12 cases of pudendal nerve neuropraxia. Two patients underwent revision surgery during the study period. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores showed a significant improvement with a final mHHS mean value of 67.7 ± 18.2, an HOOS value of 74.1 ± 13.2, and a low VAS score of 1.3 ± 1.2. Conclusions: A hip arthroscopy procedure with a standardized and unrepaired, extended interportal capsulotomy is a safe procedure with satisfactory mid-term results and high overall patient satisfaction. At a minimum of 2 years and a mean of 39.2 months, patients showed improved clinical scores and a low revision rate.

There is high variability in quantitative measurement techniques in glenohumeral capsular measurements for shoulder instability: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Instability of the glenohumeral joint remains a complex clinical issue with high rates of surgical failure and significant morbidity. Advances in specific radiologic measurements involving the glenoid and the humerus have provided insight into glenohumeral pathology, which can be corrected surgically towards improving patient outcomes. The contributions of capsular pathology to ongoing instability remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of existing glenohumeral capsular measurement techniques published in the last 15 years. METHODS: A systematic review of multiple databases was performed following PRISMA guidelines for all primary research articles between 2008 and 2023 with quantitative measurements of the glenohumeral capsule in patients with instability, including anterior, posterior and multi-directional instability. RESULTS: There were a total of 14 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. High variability in measurement methodology across studies was observed, including variable amounts of intra-articular contrast, heterogeneity among magnetic resonance sequence acquisitions, differences in measurements performed and the specific approach taken to compute each measurement. CONCLUSION: There is a need for standardization of methods in the measurement of glenohumeral capsular pathology in the setting of glenohumeral instability to allow for cross-study analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Noninterportal capsulotomy of hip arthroscopy showed improved outcomes in borderline hip dysplasia: A retrospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of hip arthroscopy using a noninterportal capsulotomy technique to address labral tears in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD). Additionally, we also compared these outcomes with those of patients with BHD who underwent the standard repaired interportal capsulotomy (RIPC) arthroscopy. METHODS: Data from patients with BHD were retrieved from a database of patients who underwent arthroscopic hip surgery with noninterportal capsulotomy or RIPC to treat labral tears between January 2014 and December 2020. Data collected included both pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (noninterportal capsulotomy, n = 37; RIPC, n = 21) with a mean age of 30.9 ± 5.6 and 28.6 ± 5.5 years, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. All of the patients underwent a minimal 2-year follow-up. The mean lateral centre-edge angle was 23.3 ± 1.2° in the noninterportal capsulotomy group and 23.7 ± 1.0° in the RIPC group, with no significant difference. The PROs improved from the preoperative to the latest follow-up, with a p < 0.001. There were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Using strict patient selection criteria, hip arthroscopy with noninterportal capsulotomy demonstrated significant pre- to postoperative improvements in patients with BHD and achieved results comparable to those from hip arthroscopy with RIPC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Editorial Commentary: Even With a High Retear Rate, Shoulder Capsular Reconstruction Outcomes are Promising, But Are We Seeing an Increase in Strength?

Superior capsular reconstruction was developed to restore patient biomechanics for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears that preclude shoulder arthroplasty. Recent studies have shown excellent short-term clinical outcomes and improved pain and functional scores but high rates of complications including retear, loss of fixation, or incomplete healing. An alternative option, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, is a reliable and safe method to ensure good muscle strength and return to play in this patient group.

Influence of the rotator cuff tear pattern in shoulder stability after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction: a computational analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of the arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in restoring glenohumeral stability in the presence of different preoperative patterns of irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs). METHODS: A computational musculoskeletal (MSK) model of the upper limb was used to simulate isolated SCR and to estimate the stability of the shoulder. Four patterns of preoperative irreparable RCTs were modeled: Supraspinatus (SSP); SSP â€‹+ â€‹Subscapularis (SSC); SSP â€‹+ â€‹Infraspinatus (ISP); and SSP â€‹+ â€‹SSC â€‹+ â€‹ISP. The muscles involved in the irreparable RCT were removed from the MSK model to simulate an irreparable full-thickness tear. In the MSK model, the muscle and joint forces were estimated for a set of upper limb positions, from four types of motions (abduction in the frontal plane, forward flexion in the sagittal plane, reaching behind the back, and combing the hair) collected in a biomechanics laboratory, through inverse dynamic analysis. The stability of the shoulder was estimated based on the tangential and compressive components of the glenohumeral joint reaction force. The comparison of pre- and post-operative conditions, for the four patterns of irreparable RCTs, with the healthy condition, was performed using ANOVA and Tukey's tests (statistical level of p â€‹< â€‹0.05). RESULTS: In the setting of an isolated irreparable SSP tear, SCR statistically significantly improved stability compared with the preoperative condition (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). For the irreparable SSP â€‹+ â€‹SSC pattern, a statistically significant loss in stability was observed (p â€‹< â€‹0.001) when SCR was applied. For the irreparable SSP â€‹+ â€‹ISP and SSP â€‹+ â€‹SSC â€‹+ â€‹ISP patterns, the postoperative condition increased shoulder stability, compared to the preoperative condition; however, the improvement was not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSION: Isolated SCR for irreparable RCTs extending beyond the SSP does not statistically significantly improve the stability of the glenohumeral joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Endoscopic anterior capsulectomy for severe elbow contractures.

Elbow stiffness secondary to trauma or surgical reconstruction can sometimes result in a severe contracture with restricted joint space, and arthroscopic access to the joint is difficult. Previous surgery and severe stiffness can also alter the position of neurovascular structures and iatrogenic injury is possible with an inside-out arthroscopic approach. To overcome these technical difficulties, an endoscopic approach to the anterior capsule can be performed as an alternative to open approach. The endoscopic approach utilises the sub-brachialis space for an outside-in capsular resection under vision. Identification of standard anatomic landmarks is useful as a guide for safe resection in a central to peripheral direction.

Meniscocapsular release technique to reduce chronic and challenging bucket-handle meniscus tear.

Several surgical procedures for the repair of bucket handle meniscus tears have been reported in the literature. However, even the most skilled surgeon can find it difficult to treat chronic and locked lesions, which typically result in meniscectomies. Therefore, a repair method for bucket-handle meniscus tears that are chronic and locked is shown, along with a case series where this procedure was used. The technique consists of a release of the joint capsule attachment to the meniscal body, which increases the mobility of the meniscus and facilitates the reduction of the injury, allowing subsequent repair through a combination of both all-inside and inside-out repair techniques. The main objective of this technique is to reduce the need for meniscectomies in difficult cases of bucket-handle meniscus tears, protect the meniscal tissue, and slow the progression of osteoarthritis in the process.

Mid-Term Outcome of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft (At Least 6 mm in Thickness) Results in High Retear Rate and No Improvement in Muscle Strength.

PURPOSE: To report and evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using fascia lata autograft in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) over a mid-term duration and to assess the overall survival rate of the graft. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent SCR with fascia lata autograft between June 2017 and August 2018. The graft, folded 3 or 4 times, achieved a minimum thickness of 6 mm during the surgical procedure. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with isolated supraspinatus IRCTs or posterosuperior IRCTs exhibiting poor muscle quality (Goutallier grade ≥3) and without arthritis (Hamada grade ≤ 2). The exclusion criteria included lack of follow-up data or magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical assessments included the visual analog scale score, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; active range of motion; and strength. Radiographic analysis included the acromiohumeral distance, Hamada grade, and graft integrity at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier curve was generated to depict SCR graft survivorship. RESULTS: In total, 45 patients (mean age, 64.8 ± 5.7 years) were included, and the average follow-up duration was 63.2 ± 5.9 months (range, 50-79 months). There was significant improvement in pain (visual analog scale score of 4.4 ± 1.3 preoperatively vs 1.4 ± 0.4 at final follow-up, P < .001). Yet, 18 patients (40.0%) and 17 patients (37.7%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score and Constant score, respectively. Active forward elevation increased from 119° ± 23° to 137° ± 23° (P < .001), and external rotation at the side improved from 29° ± 11° to 36° ± 12° (P = .002). However, strength did not exhibit improvement in any direction. The acromiohumeral distance decreased from 8.5 ± 1.7 mm to 6.5 ± 1.9 mm (P < .001), and the Hamada grade increased from 1.1 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 1.1 (P < .001). Finally, the infection rate was 13.3% (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a substantial graft retear rate of 62.2%, SCR led to a significant improvement in pain. Nonetheless, 18 patients (40.0%) and 17 patients (37.7%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score and Constant score, respectively. Forward elevation and external rotation at the side showed significant improvement, but no improvement in muscle strength was observed. Finally, significant arthritis progression was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging rotator cuff tendon stump classification correlates with the surgical outcomes following superior capsular reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between rotator cuff stump classification and postoperative outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). METHODS: A total of 75 patients who underwent SCR between June 2013 and May 2021 were included in this study. Based on stump classification using the signal intensity ratio of the tendon rupture site to the deltoid muscle in the coronal view of preoperative T2-weighted, fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging scans, the patients were classified into types 1, 2, and 3 with ratios of <0.8, 0.8-1.3, and >1.3 (44, 17, and 14 patients, respectively). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and range of motion were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up postoperatively. The acromiohumeral distance and rotator cuff arthropathy according to the Hamada classification were assessed on plain radiography. The graft integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Clinical and radiological outcomes were significantly improved after SCR. In comparison with type 2 and 3 patients, type 1 patients had significantly higher ASES scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 84 ± 10, 75 ± 15, and 76 ± 14; all P = .014), Constant scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 65 ± 5, 61 ± 9, and 56 ± 13; all P = .005), and forward flexion (type 1, 2, and 3 = 155 ± 10, 154 ± 15, and 145 ± 13; all P = .013). However, these statistical differences between groups were below the established minimum clinically important difference values for the ASES and Constant scores after rotator cuff repair. The graft failure rate after surgery was lower in the type 1 group than that in the other 2 groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .749). CONCLUSION: Patients with stump classification type 1 showed significantly better functional scores (ASES and VAS scores) and forward flexion; however, the clinical importance of these differences may be limited. Stump classification may be useful for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes.

The Contribution of Soft Tissue and Bony Stabilizers to the Hip Suction Seal: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical Studies.

BACKGROUND: Previous biomechanical studies have identified capsular closure, labral repair or reconstruction, and osteochondroplasty as important surgical interventions to improve hip stability. PURPOSE: To investigate the outcome metrics used to quantify hip stability and assess and measure the relative contributions of the labrum, capsule, and bone to hip stability through a quantitative analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included studies evaluated cadaveric hip biomechanics related to capsular, labral, and bony management during hip arthroscopy. Studies were assessed for distraction force and distance, fluid measures, and contact forces used to quantify the suction seal. Exclusion criteria included open surgery, arthroplasty, reorientation osteotomy, or traumatic dislocation. RESULTS: A total of 33 biomechanical studies comprising 322 hips that evaluated 1 or more of the following were included: distraction force or distance (24 studies), fluid measures (10 studies), and contact forces (6 studies). Compared with a capsulotomy or capsulectomy, capsular repair or reconstruction demonstrated greater resistance to distraction (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.46-1.80; P = .0009). Compared with a labral tear, a labral repair or reconstruction demonstrated less resistance to distraction (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.09; P = .02). Compared with a labral debridement, repair or reconstruction demonstrated greater resistance to distraction (SMD, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.26; P < .00001). No quantitative analysis was feasible from studies evaluating the effect of osseous resection due to the heterogeneity in methodology and outcome metrics assessed. CONCLUSION: Most biomechanical evidence supports capsulotomy repair or reconstruction to improve hip distractive stability at the end of hip arthroscopic surgery. While the repair of a torn labrum does not improve distractive resistance, it is superior to labral debridement in most biomechanical studies.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Combining Arthroscopic Bankart and Inferior Capsular Shift Avoids Open Surgery in Athletes Without Critical Glenoid Bone Loss.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can cause a myriad of injuries, each with their own unique set of challenges with respect to surgical management. The debate of whether open or arthroscopic management is the superior approach is one that predates most currently practicing orthopaedic surgeons yet remains one of the most actively researched areas of orthopaedics. Current trends favor arthroscopic management for anterior instability secondary to a Bankart lesion in patients without other risk factors for instability, such as critical glenoid bone loss. However, excellent results are not guaranteed following arthroscopic Bankart repair, particularly in athletes, due to high rates of recurrence. While the technique of inferior to superior capsular shift is not new, transitioning a historically open technique to the arthroscopic world may represent another tool in the glenohumeral instability management toolbox. While perspectives are evolving, more evidence supporting arthroscopic techniques like the capsular shift are needed to better identify appropriate patient populations.

Editorial Commentary: Capsule Repair Is Necessary at the Conclusion of Arthroscopy to Optimize Return to Full Activity.

Hip capsulotomy and capsule repair have minimal effect on joint kinematics during activities of daily living. With low demands placed on the hip, the hip capsule may provide little to no role on hip stability or microinstability. But the majority, if not all, patients undergoing hip arthroscopy are not content with only resuming basic activities of daily living. Seeking to optimize the hip joint to its maximum capacity should be the goal. Capsule repair is necessary in most to achieve that goal.

Clinical and radiological outcomes between superior capsule reconstruction using allografts or xenografts: a 2-year retrospective comparison study.

BACKGROUND: Treating symptomatic, massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears remains challenging and controversial. Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using the tensor fascia lata has shown promising clinical results; however, due to donor site morbidity, interest in SCR using other grafts has increased. Yet, no studies have compared allografts with xenografts. In addition, the clinical results of graft tears remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR between those with allografts and xenografts. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients who had undergone SCR with allografts or xenografts between January 2016 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Furthermore, 62 patients were evaluated 2 years postsurgery, with five patients excluded due to loss to follow-up or conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and visual analog scale scores, range of motion, and radiological outcomes were evaluated before the surgery and at 6 and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: The graft tear rate was 23.08% in the allograft group and 42.86% in the xenograft group at 6 months after surgery; at 2 years postsurgery, the gap further widened to 32.43% and 64%, respectively, showing a significant difference. The graft in the allograft group was thicker than that in the xenograft group, and there were significant differences on the humeral side and in the midsubstance area. The allograft group showed significantly better visual analog scale, Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores than the xenograft group 2 years postsurgery. However, the difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups did not surpass minimal clinically important differences. CONCLUSION: Although arthroscopic SCR using xenografts had significantly lower clinical outcome than allografts, this difference did not reach minimal clinically important differences. Arthroscopic SCR using xenografts showed higher graft tear rates than allografts. Even with partial tears, better results were obtained if the graft continuity was maintained. Additionally, after surgery, the xenograft showed less thickness than the allograft and resulted in more tears, specifically in the midsubstance area.