Humeral Head Reconstruction of Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions.

Compared with anterior instability, posterior shoulder dislocations are a rare entity and are often missed at presentation. A concomitant anteromedial impression fracture of the humeral head, or a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion, is commonly present with these dislocations and is more pronounced with a longer timeline to reduction. Treatment of these defects ranges from nonsurgical treatment to soft-tissue procedures, bony reconstruction, and arthroplasty. Management may be dictated by various factors, such as patient demands, defect size and location, concomitant injuries, and underlying etiology. Small reverse Hill-Sachs defects without engagement can generally be treated nonsurgically or with benign neglect, whereas larger defects (>20%) often require surgery. The most reported surgical techniques are the (arthroscopic) McLaughlin and modified McLaughlin procedure, disimpaction and bone grafting, or reconstruction of the defect with autograft or with fresh (or fresh-frozen) osteochondral allograft. Finally, arthroplasty is generally required for large defects, where more than 45% to 50% of the articular cartilage is involved. Overall, reported outcomes generally reflect patient satisfaction for most patients, with a low incidence of secondary instability or posttraumatic arthritis, although better results are achieved when recognizing and treating these injuries in the more acute setting.

Core decompression is superior to nonoperative management for humeral head osteonecrosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Much of the literature on osteonecrosis has traditionally focused on the hip, which remains the most common site for this disease. The shoulder and the knee are the second most frequently affected sites (both approximately 10% of the incidence). There are a variety of techniques for managing this disease, and it is important to optimize this for our patients. This review aimed to compare the results of core decompression (CD) vs. nonoperative modalities for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the humeral head, including (1) success rate defined as lack of progression to further procedures (shoulder arthroplasty) and no need for further intervention; (2) clinical results (patient-reported pain and functional scores); and (3) radiological outcomes. METHODS: We queried PubMed and found 15 reports that fit the inclusion criteria for studies concerning the use of CD as well as studies discussing nonoperative treatment for stage I-III osteonecrotic lesions of the shoulder. A total of 9 studies encompassed 291 shoulders that underwent CD analyzed at a mean follow-up of 8.1 years (range, 67 months-12 years), and 6 studies examined 359 shoulders that underwent nonoperative management at a mean follow-up of 8.1 years (range, 35 months-10 years). Outcomes of CD and nonoperative management included success rate, number of shoulders requiring shoulder arthroplasty, and evaluation of several normalized patient-reported outcomes. We also assessed radiographic progression (pre- to postcollapse or further collapse progression). RESULTS: The mean success rate of CD for avoiding further procedures was 76.6% (226 of 291 shoulders) in stage I through stage III. Stage III shoulders avoided shoulder arthroplasty in 63% (27 of 43 shoulders). Nonoperative management resulted in a success rate of 13%, P < .001. In the CD studies, 7 of 9 showed improvements in clinical outcome measurements compared with 1 of 6 of the nonoperative studies. Radiographically, there was less progression in the CD group (39 of 191 shoulders [24.2%]) vs. the nonoperative group (39 of 74 shoulders [52.3%]) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high success rate and positive clinical outcomes reported, CD is an effective method for management, especially when compared with nonoperative treatment methods for stage I-III osteonecrosis of the humeral head. The authors believe that it should be used as treatment to avoid arthroplasty in patients who have osteonecrosis of the humeral head.

Predictors of Bone Loss in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability can result in bone loss of both the anterior glenoid and the posterior humerus. Bone loss has been shown to lead to increased failure postoperatively and may necessitate more complex surgical procedures, resulting in worse clinical outcomes and posttraumatic arthritis. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors of glenoid and humeral head bone loss in patients undergoing surgery for anterior shoulder instability. It was hypothesized that male sex, contact sport participation, traumatic dislocation, and higher number of instability events would be associated with greater bone loss. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 892 patients with anterior shoulder instability were prospectively enrolled in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort. The presence and amount of anterior glenoid bone loss and accompanying Hill-Sachs lesions were quantified. Descriptive information and injury history were used to construct proportional odds models for the presence of any bone defect, for defects >10% of the anterior glenoid or humeral head, and for combined bony defects. RESULTS: Anterior glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions were present in 185 (20.7%) and 470 (52.7%) patients, respectively. Having an increased number of dislocations was associated with bone loss in all models. Increasing age, male sex, and non-White race were associated with anterior glenoid bone defects and Hill-Sachs lesions. Contact sport participation was associated with anterior glenoid bone loss, and Shoulder Actitvity Scale with glenoid bone loss >10%. A positive apprehension test was associated with Hill-Sachs lesions. Combined lesions were present in 19.4% of patients, and for every additional shoulder dislocation, the odds of having a combined lesion was 95% higher. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of preoperative shoulder dislocations is the factor most strongly associated with glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesions, and combined lesions. Early surgical stabilization before recurrence of instability may be the most effective method for preventing progression to clinically significant bone loss. Patients should be made aware of the expected course of shoulder instability, especially in athletes at high risk for recurrence and osseous defects, which may complicate care and worsen outcomes. REGISTRATION: NCT02075775 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Editorial Commentary: Free Bone Block With Remplissage Provides Less Translation Than Free Bone Block Alone in Shoulder Instability Patients With Bipolar Bone Loss.

It would stand to reason that, in shoulder instability patients with bipolar bone loss, the combination of a bone block procedure and a remplissage procedure would provide better results than each one alone. Why would this be the case? When performing these procedures in the lateral decubitus position for patients with critical bipolar bone loss, the humeral head is anteriorly and inferiorly subluxed. This is most likely due to the incompetent restraints when in traction. A bone block procedure alone doesn't necessarily reduce the glenohumeral center of rotation; rather, it increases the "jump distance," making it more difficult for the humerus to dislocate over the bone block. However, the remplissage procedure not only makes the Hill-Sachs lesion extra-articular and prevents the defect from levering out the humerus, but also seems to pull the humeral head posteriorly centering it in the glenoid. This provides a posterior tether to the humeral head while increasing the jump distance over the bone block even further. In the future, one can anticipate a significant increase in remplissage-augmented bone block procedures in patients with bipolar bone loss.

Humeral head coverage in arthroscopic partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears improves functional outcomes: an analysis of influential factors.

BACKGROUND: Although partial rotator cuff repair has shown good outcomes, differences in clinical outcomes remain concerns. This study was performed to determine whether patients with humeral head coverage would show better functional outcomes than patients without humeral head coverage and to identify the factors for humeral head coverage after arthroscopic partial repair of massive tears. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 63 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic partial repair between 2012 and 2018. Two to four margin convergences were first performed; then, the Mason-Allen technique was performed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with humeral head coverage (38 cases) and those without humeral head coverage (25 cases). The following factors were evaluated: age; sex; hypertension; diabetes; osteoporosis; preoperative and postoperative pseudoparalysis, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Constant score, acromiohumeral distance, and subacromial bony spur; and subscapularis tear and repair. Muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, and the integrity of the repaired cuff was evaluated by ultrasonography at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with preoperative values, significant improvements in VAS pain scores (from 6.27 to 2.32 in patients with humeral head coverage and from 7.00 to 2.81 in those without humeral head coverage) and Constant scores (from 51.35 to 75.95 and from 44.62 to 69.81, respectively) were observed in both groups (P < .001). Statistical analysis revealed that postoperative VAS pain scores (2.32 vs. 2.81) and Constant scores (75.95 vs. 69.81) in patients with humeral head coverage were superior to those in patients without humeral head coverage (P = .044 and P = .003, respectively). The integrity of the repaired cuff was evaluated by ultrasonography, and partial tears were found in 4 of 37 patients with humeral head coverage and 2 of 26 patients without humeral head coverage (P = .816). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age (P < .001), comorbidity (P = .005), symptom duration (P = .023), preoperative shoulder mobility (P < .001), maintained acromiohumeral distance (P = .006), subscapularis tear (P = .026), and less preoperative supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle atrophy (P = .001 and P = .010, respectively) had significant correlations with humeral head coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Overall satisfactory results were achieved in most patients regardless of high retear rates, but patients with partial repair covering the humeral head were associated with better outcomes than patients without humeral head coverage. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (<70 years, P = .003), capability of shoulder mobility (P = .005), maintenance of the acromiohumeral space (>7 mm, P = .016), and less atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles (P = .021) were favorable factors to achieve humeral head coverage during surgical partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

The association between anterior shoulder joint capsule thickening and glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder joint capsule thickening is typically present in osteoarthritic shoulders, but its association with specific patterns of glenoid wear is incompletely understood. We sought to determine the relationship between anterior capsular thickening and glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 134 consecutive osteoarthritic shoulders with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans performed. Axial fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging slices were used to quantify the anterior capsular thickness in millimeters, measured at its thickest point below the subscapularis muscle. Computed tomography scans were used to classify glenoid deformity according to the Walch classification, and an automated 3-dimensional software program provided values for glenoid retroversion and humeral head subluxation. Multinomial and linear regression models were used to characterize the association of anterior capsular thickening with Walch glenoid type, glenoid retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation while controlling for patient age and sex. RESULTS: The anterior capsule was thickest in glenoid types B2 (5.5 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0-6.0) and B3 (6.1 mm, 95% CI: 5.6-6.6) and thinnest in A1 (3.7 mm, 95% CI: 3.3-4.2; P < .001). Adjusted for age and sex, glenoid types B2 (odds ratio: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.3-8.4, P < .001) and B3 (odds ratio: 5.4, 95% CI: 2.8-10.4, P < .001) showed the strongest association with increased anterior capsule thickness, compared to glenoid type A1. Increased capsular thickness correlated with greater glenoid retroversion (r = 0.57; P < .001) and posterior humeral head subluxation (r = 0.50; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, for every 1-mm increase in anterior capsular thickening, there was an adjusted mean increase of 3.2° (95% CI: 2.4-4.1) in glenoid retroversion and a 3.8% (95% CI: 2.7-5.0) increase in posterior humeral head subluxation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased thickening of the anterior shoulder capsule is associated with greater posterior glenoid wear and humeral head subluxation. Additional research should determine whether anterior capsular disease plays a causative role in the etiology or progression of eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Factors related to large bone defects of bipolar lesions and a high number of instability episodes with anterior glenohumeral instability.

BACKGROUND: Significant bone defects are associated with poor clinical results after surgical stabilization in cases of glenohumeral instability. Although multiple factors are thought to adversely affect enlargement of bipolar bone loss and increased shoulder instability, these factors have not been sufficiently evaluated. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors related to greater bone defects and a higher number of instability episodes in patients with glenohumeral instability. METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients with symptomatic unilateral instability of the glenohumeral joint were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional surface-rendered/registered models of bilateral glenoids and proximal humeri from computed tomography data were matched by software, and the volumes of bone defects identified in the glenoid and humeral head were assessed. After relationships between objective variables and explanatory variables were evaluated using bivariate analyses, factors related to large bone defects in the glenoid and humeral head and a high number of total instability episodes and self-irreducible dislocations greater than the respective 75th percentiles were evaluated using logistic regression analyses with significant variables on bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Larger humeral head defects (P < .001) and a higher number of total instability episodes (P = .032) were found to be factors related to large glenoid defects. On the other hand, male sex (P = .014), larger glenoid defects (P = .015), and larger number of self-irreducible dislocations (P = .027) were related to large humeral head bone defects. An increased number of total instability episodes was related to longer symptom duration (P = .001) and larger glenoid defects (P = .002), and an increased number of self-irreducible dislocations was related to larger humeral head defects (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas this study showed that bipolar lesions affect the amount of bone defects reciprocally, factors related to greater bone defects differed between the glenoid and the humeral head. Glenoid defects were related to the number of total instability episodes, whereas humeral head defects were related to the number of self-irreducible dislocations.

Shoulder Position During Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram Significantly Affects Capsular Measurements.

PURPOSE: To determine whether change in shoulder position between internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) during magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) affects previously defined capsular measurements and to determine the utility of rotation in the diagnosis of instability. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of patients who received a shoulder MRA with humeral IR and ER views. Patients with an arthroscopically confirmed diagnosis of instability and those with clinically stable shoulders, no history of instability, and no MRA findings of instability were identified and compared. Humeral rotation, glenoid retroversion, humeral head subluxation, capsular length, and capsular area using axial sequences of IR and ER views were recorded. Analysis compared IR, ER, and Δ capsular measurements between groups using independent t tests and univariate and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects who were diagnosed with instability were included, along with 28 control subjects. Capsular length, capsular area, and humeral subluxations were significantly greater with ER compared with IR views (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001). Patients with instability displayed greater ER capsular length (P = .0006) and ER capsular area (P = .005) relative to controls. Multivariate logistic regression identified age, weight, sex, ER capsular length, and retroversion to be significant predictors of instability. ER capsular length independently predicts instability with 86% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Interobserver reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient was rated good or excellent on all measurements. CONCLUSION: Variance in humeral rotation during shoulder MRA significantly affects capsular measurements. Rotational views increase the utility of capsular measurements when assessing for instability, particularly capsular length and capsular area. The implementation of ER positioning enhances the ability to examine capsular changes of the shoulder joint and can assist in the diagnosis of instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

Reproducibility of the modified Neer classification defining displacement with respect to the humeral head fragment for proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Although the Neer classification is widely used for the assessment of proximal humeral fractures, its reproducibility has been challenged. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the conventional Neer classification and a modified classification that defined fracture displacement with respect to the humeral head fragment. METHODS: The fracture patterns in 80 cases of proximal humeral fractures were independently assessed by 6 observers. The cases were grouped according to the conventional Neer classification using radiographs followed by computed tomography (CT) scans by each examiner twice with a 1-month interval. The fractures were then classified with the modified Neer classification, which defined displacement of the fragment as separation of more than 1 cm or angulation of more than 45° from the humeral head fragment, twice with a 1-month interval. Kappa coefficients of the conventional and modified Neer classifications were compared. RESULTS: The modified classification showed significantly higher intra-observer agreement than the conventional classification, both for radiographs (P = .028) and for CT scans (P = .043). Intra-observer agreement was also significantly higher for the modified classification than for the conventional classification, both for radiographs (P = .001) and for CT scans (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that agreement for the Neer classification could be improved when fracture displacement was defined as separation or angulation from the humeral head. Considering vascularity to the humeral head, furthermore, the modified method might be more helpful for predicting patients' prognosis than the conventional Neer classification.

When to Abandon the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Bone loss is a major factor in determining surgical choice in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. Although bone loss has been described, there is no consensus on glenoid, humeral head, and bipolar bone loss limits for which arthroscopic-only management with Bankart repair can be performed. OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for selecting a more complex repair or reconstruction (in lieu of arthroscopic-only Bankart repair) in the setting of glenohumeral instability based on available literature. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of the literature for the period from 2000 to 2019 was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE). STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they quantified bone loss (humeral head or glenoid) in the setting of anterior instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, level of evidence, patient demographics, follow-up, recurrence rates, and measures of bone loss (glenoid, humeral head, bipolar). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 measured glenoid bone loss, 5 measured humeral head bone loss, and 2 measured "tracking" without explicit measurement of humeral head bone loss. Measurement techniques for glenoid and humeral head bone loss varied widely. Recommendations for maximum glenoid bone loss for arthroscopic repair were largely <15% of glenoid width in recent studies. Recommendations regarding humeral head loss were more variable (many authors providing only qualitative descriptions) with increasing attention on glenohumeral tracking. CONCLUSION: It is essential that a standardized method of glenoid and humeral head bone loss measurements be performed preoperatively to assess which patients will have successful stabilization after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Glenoid bone loss should be <15%, and humeral head lesions should be "on track" if an arthroscopic-only Bankart is planned. If there is greater bone loss, adjunct or open procedures should be performed.

Idiopathic humeral head osteonecrosis mimicking rotator cuff disorders: Two challenging diagnostic case reports.

RATIONALE: Shoulder pain is a common complaint among patients, and rotator cuff disorders are the most common diagnoses. Humeral head osteonecrosis is easily masked by other more common diagnoses and concomitant conditions. PATIENT CONCERNS: This challenging diagnostic report consists of 2 cases. Case 1 was that of a 59-year-old man who presented with right shoulder pain that had lasted for >1 year. Case 2 was that of a 52-year-old man who complained of right shoulder pain lasting for 6 months. They both presented with chronic right shoulder pain without relevant trauma history, and the physical examination showed a tenderness point over the right greater tuberosity. DIAGNOSIS: These 2 patients were diagnosed with osteonecrosis involving the right greater tuberosity region via magnetic resonance imaging. INTERVENTIONS: In case 1, the patient underwent cord decompression and artificial bone grafting with C-arm guidance. In case 2, the patient refused surgical intervention and decided to continue receiving physical therapy for symptom control. OUTCOMES: In case 1, the patient responded well to cord decompression and artificial bone grafting. After the surgery, the active range of motion was restored and the pain in the right shoulder diminished further. In case 2, conservative treatment helped alleviate the patient's shoulder pain but did not entirely eliminate it. LESSONS: Physicians should always have a high index of suspicion for osteonecrosis, especially when treating chronic shoulder pain, regardless of whether there are typical symptoms/known risk factors or not.

3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Recreation of glenohumeral biomechanics and humeral anatomy has been shown to improve outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty. Recent research has focused on utilizing simulation software and intraoperative instrumentation to improve glenoid implant selection and positioning, but no study had evaluated the reliability of new features in 3D preoperative planning software for humeral planning in total shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative plans were created for 26 patients using three different simulation software programs: an independent preoperative planning simulation (IPPS) software (OrthoVis) and two automated manufacturers preoperative simulation systems: ArthrexVIP™ (AMPS I) and Tornier Blueprint™ 3D Planning (AMPS II). Preoperative plans were compared for reliability and consistency among different software systems based on available variables including humeral head diameter (HD) and head height (HH). RESULTS: The measured HD was consistent between the three systems with a maximum mean difference of 0.2 mm for HD among IPPS, AMPS I, and AMPS II (p = 0.964). There was a significant difference in measured humeral HH with 1.7 mm difference between IPPS and AMPS II (p ≤ 0.001). The strongest correlation when comparing humeral head measurements (diameter or height) obtained from all systems was seen between IPPS and AMPS I for humeral HD (r = 0.8; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a high level of consistency between independent and manufacturer preoperative planning software for humeral head measurements. These preoperative planning systems can improve efficiency and workflow during surgery by guiding surgeons on implant size selection to optimally reconstruct the glenohumeral kinematics, in order to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, study of nonconsecutive patients and without a universally applied "gold" standard study of diagnostic test.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of 17 reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases performed after failed humeral head resurfacing.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the good outcomes with shoulder resurfacing procedures reported by some authors, our team has documented several failures caused by glenoid erosion and rotator cuff rupture, likely due to implant overstuffing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) performed after failed humeral head resurfacing (HHR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of 17 patients who underwent RSA after failed HHR between January 2011 and February 2016. The mean patient age was 69.4 years and the mean time between HHR and surgical revision was 41 months (14.7-73.5±18.8). Preoperative ultrasonography and CT were used to evaluate the condition of the rotator cuff, extent of glenoid erosion and to look for signs of humeral cup loosening. The clinical outcomes were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the simple shoulder test (SST), DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and the Constant-Murley score. Pain was estimated using a visual analog scale (VAS). The range of motion (ROM) was determined pre- and postoperatively. All patients had standard AP and lateral X-ray views of the shoulder taken as part of their postoperative follow-up protocol to look for implant loosening. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 35.9 months (24-59±10.7). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All the functional scores were improved after RSA. The median weighted Constant score preoperatively was 46% (36; 62) while it was 92% postoperatively (78; 100) (p<0.0001). The active ROM improved by 65° in forward flexion (p=0.0003) and by 30° in external rotation (p=0.002). On X-rays, we identified one patient with Sirveaux stage 4 glenoid notching and one patient with a humeral periprosthetic radiolucent line less than 2mm thick in zone 6, with no clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: The excellent outcomes after RSA for failed HHR in our study are similar to the ones reported when RSA is performed for cuff tear arthropathy.

Synthetic osteochondral resurfacing for treatment of large caudocentral osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the humeral head in 24 dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of dogs with large, caudocentral, osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the humeral head treated with synthetic osteochondral resurfacing (SOR) implants. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: Twenty-four client-owned large breed or giant dogs. METHODS: The medical records of all dogs treated with first generation (G1) and second generation (G2) SOR implants were reviewed. All dogs were assessed with clinical examination and imaging 12 weeks after surgery. Assessment of outcome was based on subjective assessment of lameness, scoring of postoperative radiographs, and the Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) questionnaire. RESULTS: Osteochondral resurfacing was performed with a G1 implant in 13 dogs (15 shoulders) and a G2 implant in 11 dogs (13 shoulders). Lameness resolved in all dogs treated with G1 implants and in 10 dogs treated with G2 implants by 12 weeks after surgery. One dog treated with a G2 implant was found to have an implant-associated infection, requiring implant removal. No recurrence of lameness was reported in 9 limbs treated with G1 implants and 10 limbs treated with G2 implants that were available for clinical review at a median time of 387 and 365 days, respectively, after surgery. Mean postoperative LOAD scores were 4.2 of 52 and 5.2 of 52 in dogs treated with a G1 or a G2 implant, respectively. CONCLUSION: Synthetic resurfacing was technically feasible in all joints of this study and resulted in good clinical results. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of SOR implants seems viable to treat large caudocentral OCD lesions of the humeral head in dogs and warrants prospective comparison with conventional arthroscopic treatment.

Percutaneous osteoplasty for the management of a humeral head metastasis: Two case reports.

RATIONALE: Percutaneous osteoplasty (POP) has been proved effective to relieve pain in metastases of vertebral, pelvis, and femur. Nevertheless, there are few reports about the effectiveness of POP in the humeral head metastases. In this study, we described 2 patients with humeral head metastases treated with POP in our hospital. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1 was a 79-year-old man with vertebral and right humeral head metastasis after radical surgery or and periods of chemotherapy for bladder cancer. He suffered constant severe back and right shoulder joint pain even if taking much non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Case 2 was a 59-year-old woman with vertebral and right humeral head metastasis from lung cancer. She received regular radiotherapy and took much painkillers to relieve pain. However, the pain could not be relieved any more after 1 month and severely affects sleeping and daily activities. DIAGNOSIS: Both 2 patients were diagnosed as vertebral metastases and right proximal humeral head metastases. INTERVENTIONS: POP was performed to treat the right humeral head metastases. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was performed to treat vertebral metastases. OUTCOMES: After surgery, the patients experienced significant decrease in pain and better motor function. Both patients did not suffer from pulmonary embolism, infection, nerve injury, and bone cement syndrome. LESSONS: For the pain that cannot be relieved by radiotherapy and analgesic drugs, POP is a safe and beneficial minimally invasive procedure that provides immediate and substantial relief from pain for humerus head metastases.

Bone healing potential of fascia lata autografts to the humeral head footprint in rotator cuff reconstruction based on magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evaluations.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the bone healing potential of fascia lata autograft (FLA) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histologic analysis. METHODS: The study included 69 patients assessed by MRI after an FLA patch procedure. Three of the 69 patients underwent a revision procedure after the primary FLA procedure; 1 underwent a second-look arthroscopy and 2 underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs). In the 2 RSA patients, we histologically evaluated greater tuberosities with the repaired graft. Moreover, as a control, we harvested the greater tuberosity with the cuff tendon at the time of RSA for failed open reduction-internal fixation of 4-part proximal humeral fracture. Based on MRI, retear cases were divided into type 1 (the graft did not remain on the greater tuberosity) and type 2 (the graft remained on the greater tuberosity). Histologic sections were evaluated to examine fascia-bone or rotator cuff-bone interfaces. RESULTS: There were 35 intact repairs: 7 type 1 and 27 type 2 shoulders (type 1 vs. type 2, P < .001). Second-look arthroscopic findings confirmed that the graft was securely attached to the greater tuberosity. Histologic analysis of greater tuberosities in RSA patients showed solid continuity of the graft to the bone, with cells with nuclei in the collagen matrix oriented in parallel. The FLA to bone junction consisted of the FLA, fibrocartilage, and bone, which is similar to the normal cuff tendon to bone junction. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a fresh cellular FLA has good to excellent bone healing potential.

Humeral head histopathological changes in cuff tear arthropathy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the histopathological changes in the humeral head in cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) compared with those in glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) and humeral neck fracture, which served as non-cuff tear controls. METHODS: Twenty-three humeral heads extracted at the time of shoulder prosthesis arthroplasty between June 2014 and July 2015 were evaluated in the present study. The diagnoses included four-part humeral neck fracture ( n = 4; average age, 85.0 years), glenohumeral OA ( n = 4; average age, 71.0 years), and CTA ( n = 15; average age, 73.0 years). The humeral heads were evaluated pathologically by hematoxylin and eosin and Safranin-O staining, and the thickness of the articular cartilage was measured. RESULTS: Fibrillation, thinning, and tearing of the cartilage were observed in the superior area of the humeral heads in CTA and glenohumeral OA. In CTA cases, clusters of chondrocytes in the cartilage were observed. Moreover, the thickness of the cartilage layer in the middle of the humeral head was 1.54 ± 0.07, 0.32 ± 0.46, and 2.19 ± 0.50 mm in humeral neck fracture, glenohumeral OA, and CTA, respectively. The cartilage layer in CTA was thicker than that in glenohumeral OA (CTA vs. OA: p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: OA changes in the superior area of the humeral heads and thickening of the cartilage layer from the middle to the inferior of the humeral heads were confirmed histopathologically, suggesting that simultaneous mechanical and nutritional factors might be contributing to CTA pathogenesis. The current study provided the better understanding of cartilage damage and thickening in CTA. This will help guide treatment options in the setting of CTA.

Anatomic locking plates for complex proximal humeral fractures: anatomic neck fractures versus surgical neck fractures.

BACKGROUND: Continued debate exists on the management of displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures. Only a few studies have compared the efficacy of proximal humeral locking plates (PHLPs) for treating anatomic neck fractures (ANFs) and surgical neck fractures (SNFs). METHODS: The medical data of 31 consecutive patients with displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with PHLPs between May 2013 and April 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. We divided the patients into the ANF and SNF groups and assessed the neck-shaft angle (NSA), sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance, and other parameters postoperatively at 3 days and at 12 months using shoulder radiographs. The Constant-Murley scores were assessed at 3 days, 12 months, and last follow-up. RESULTS: The ANF group had a significantly lower mean age and significantly greater mean operative duration, estimated blood loss, and rate of bone grafting. Full or partial osteonecrosis of the humeral head developed in 7 patients and 1 patient in the ANF and SNF groups, respectively. Screw cutout and/or pullout complications occurred in 8 cases in the ANF group but not in the SNF group. In the ANF group, the values for NSA and the sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance changed significantly from 3 days to 12 months postoperatively. There were no significant correlations among the tested parameters. CONCLUSION: ANFs resulted in more complications at a younger age than SNFs. ANF treatment using PHLPs is more prone to a decreased NSA and humeral head osteonecrosis and has poorer clinical outcomes than SNF treatment using PHLPs.

Risk factors for anterior shoulder instability: a matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic skeletal features of the shoulder play important roles in anterior shoulder dislocation. However, studies on the effect of the humeral structure are few. This case-control study aimed to analyze the risk factors of anterior shoulder instability, including glenoid and humeral factors. METHODS: Anterior shoulder instability was found in 64 of 10,035 individuals who underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Propensity score matching was used to select controls matched for age, sex, height, and weight. We analyzed the glenoid and humeral structural data using conditional logistic regression analysis and identified cutoff points using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the control and dislocation groups in the depth-to-width ratio (0.119 ± 0.034 vs. 0.105 ± 0.037, P = .021), height-to-width ratio (1.51 ± 0.13 vs. 1.67 ± 0.16, P < .001), humeral head diameter-to-glenoid fossa diameter ratio (1.56 ± 0.11 vs. 1.64 ± 0.20, P < .001), and humeral containing angle (67.3° ± 5.9° vs. 60.4° ± 5.9°, P < .001). The humeral containing angle (odds ratio, 0.95; P = .024) and the glenoid height-to-width ratio (odds ratio, 7.88; P = .002), adjusted for the depth-to-width ratio and diameter ratio, were associated with anterior shoulder instability. The cutoff point for the humeral containing angle was 64° and for the height-to-width ratio was 1.60. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant risk factors for shoulder instability in the Chinese Han population. The humeral containing angle and the glenoid height-to-width ratio were risk factors for anterior shoulder instability.

A Clinical Comparison of Linear- and Surface Area-Based Methods of Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether linear-based measurement significantly overestimates glenoid bone loss in comparison with surface area-based measurement in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. HYPOTHESIS: Linear-based measurement will significantly overestimate glenoid bone loss in comparison with surface area-based measurement in patients with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Thirty patients with anterior shoulder instability underwent preoperative bilateral shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans. Three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) reconstruction with humeral head subtraction was performed to obtain an en face view of the 3D-CT glenoid. Glenoid bone loss was measured with the surface area and linear methods of measurement. Statistical analysis was performed with a paired 2-tailed t test. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (5 female and 23 male; mean age, 25.1 years; age range, 15-58 years) were included in the study; 17 patients underwent a glenoid augmentation procedure, and 11 underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. The mean percentage glenoid bone loss calculated with the surface area and linear methods was 12.8% ± 8.0% and 17.5% ± 9.7% ( P < .0001), respectively. For the 17 patients who underwent glenoid augmentation, mean percentage bone loss with the surface area and linear methods was 16.6% ± 7.9% and 23.0% ± 8.0% ( P < .0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Linear measurement of glenoid bone loss significantly overestimates bone loss compared with surface area measurement in patients with anterior glenoid bony defects. These results indicate that these different methods cannot be used interchangeably and cannot be used with the same critical thresholds for glenoid bone loss.