Efficacy and Toxicity of Calcitonin Treatment in Children with Cherubism: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Cherubism is a rare autosomal dominant disease characterized by expansile osteolytic jawbone lesions. The effect and safety of off-label calcitonin treatment during the progressive phase of the disease are not well described. In this retrospective study, we present data on the radiological response and adverse effects of subcutaneously administered calcitonin in a cohort of nine cherubism children (three female, six male). Two of the nine patients underwent two separate treatment courses with a significant off-treatment interval in between; therefore, a total of 11 treatment courses with a mean duration of 17.9 months (range <1 to 35, SD 10.8) were studied. To measure the response, the cumulative volume of cherubism lesions was calculated from available three-dimensional imaging. The primary outcome was the change in the volume of lesions during calcitonin treatment and only assessed for the eight treatment courses with a minimal duration of 6 months. A statistically significant reduction in the mean cumulative volume of lesions was seen regardless of treatment duration. Average volume reduction was highest in the first half year of treatment, with a gradual, ongoing reduction thereafter. For the secondary outcome, the change in the cumulative volume of lesions after treatment cessation was assessed for the seven treatment courses with follow-up imaging available. After six of these seven treatment courses, the cumulative volume increased again but remained undoubtedly smaller than the initial volume at the start of therapy. Adverse effects were assessed for all 11 treatment courses and occurred in 73% of them. Most adverse effects were mild and low grade, with the most severe being one grade 3 symptomatic hypocalcemia requiring hospitalization and early treatment termination. Calcitonin treatment seems effective and tolerable in treating actively progressing cherubism in children. However, further research is required to better understand the pharmacological treatment of cherubism, including also other drugs, dosing, and protocols. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Effect of elcatonin versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications for acute back pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multiclinic randomized controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of elcatonin injections and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for patients with osteoporosis who have acute lumbar pain after experiencing new vertebral compression fractures. Two hundred twenty-eight Japanese female patients (mean age 77.3 years) with acute lumbar pain from osteoporotic vertebral fractures were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in one group were given an NSAID (NSAIDs group) and patients in the other group were given weekly intramuscular injections of 20 units of elcatonin (elcatonin group). All patients underwent follow-up examinations up to 6 weeks from the start of the trial. Outcome measures were the level of functional impairment according to the Japan Questionnaire for Osteoporotic Pain (JQ22), the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain intensity. Statistical analyses focused on (1) the time course of pain and functional level using linear mixed effects models to analyze the longitudinal data and (2) the effectiveness of elcatonin injection with mean difference values and 95 % confidence intervals. Significant differences were seen over time between the initial values and the postintervention values (4 and 6 weeks) in JQ22, RDQ, and VAS scores (effect size d > 0.4) in each group. The mean differences between the elcatonin group and the NSAIDs group in each measure at 4 and 6 weeks were -4.8 and -8.3 for the JQ22, -1.3 and -2.6 for the RDQ, and -11.3 and -11.5 for the VAS, shifted to elcatonin. Once weekly elcatonin injection was more effective than NSAIDs for treating acute lumbar pain and improving mobility in Japanese women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

[Current views on the interaction between the treatment of osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases].

The most common medical conditions after menopause are osteoporosis and atherosclerotic disease. Traditionally these two conditions were considered unrelated and their coexistence has been attributed to independent processess exclusively reated to age. The possible link between cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis stimulates today to analyse not only the evidence of a possible association, but also to identify mutual beneficial and adverse effects of drugs used in these two diseases. That's why, the focus on the interference between osteoporosis treatment and drugs used for atherosclerosis is made. Moreover side effects of cardiological drug considering bones are analysed. Additionally possible advantages of selected drugs used for cardiovascular diseases on osteoporosis prevention are evaluated. Drugs used for osteoporosis treatment may heave adverse effects on cardiovascular system. The article has detailed analyses of current drug classes, such as the bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate as well as a review of the controversy surrounding hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and the selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Lastly discussion of adverse effects on the heart of calcium and drugs influencing calcium metabolism such as vitamin D, parathormone and calcitonin is performed.

Does salmon calcitonin cause cancer? A review and meta-analysis.

Recently an association between the use of calcitonin and cancer has been postulated. We reviewed the biological rationale and performed an additional analysis of historical data with respect to the possibility. An association cannot be excluded, but the relationship is weak and causality is unlikely. The purpose of the present study is to review the strength of association and likelihood of a causal relationship between use of calcitonin and cancer. We reviewed the evidence for this association, including the molecular signaling mechanisms of calcitonin, preclinical data, an "experiment of nature," and the results of a previous meta-analysis which showed a weak association. We performed an additional meta-analysis to incorporate the data from a novel investigational oral formulation of salmon calcitonin. Review of the literature did not identify a cellular signaling mechanism of action which might account for a causal relationship or toxicologic or postmarketing data to support the thesis. Additional clinical results incorporated into previous meta-analyses weakened but did not completely negate the possibility of association. A causal association between calcitonin use and malignancy is unlikely, as there is little biological plausibility. The preponderance of nonclinical and clinical evidence also does not favor a causal relationship.

Treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with oral salmon calcitonin: results from two phase 3 trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the structure-modifying and symptom efficacy, as well as safety and tolerability of oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) formulated with a 5-CNAC carrier (a molecule based on Eligen(®) technology), in osteoarthritis (OA) patients with moderate to severe knee pain and joint structural damage classified as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL)2-3. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is the combined reporting of two randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled trials (CSMC021C2301 and CSMC021C2302), evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral sCT in patients with painful knee OA with structural manifestations, enrolling 1176 and 1030 patients, respectively. Study subjects were randomized (1:1) to oral sCT 0.8 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO) for 24 months. The primary efficacy objectives were to examine the treatment effect compared to placebo on change over 24 months in joint space width (JSW) in the signal knee measured by X-ray, and to examine the change in pain and function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire. Other study parameters included patient and physician global assessment, and biochemical markers of bone (CTX-I) and cartilage degradation (CTX-II). RESULTS: At the 24 month endpoint there was no statistically significant treatment effect on joint space narrowing (JSN) in any of the two studies. In CSMC021C2301 there was a treatment effect on WOMAC (sum of pain, function, stiffness, and total scores) as well as on the biomarkers of bone and joint metabolism, but due to the hierarchical testing procedure the treatment effect was not claimed statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The present formulation of oral sCT did not provide reproducible clinical benefits in patients with symptomatic knee OA (NCT00486434, NCT00704847).

Calcitonin nasal spray and increased cancer risk: a population-based nested case-control study.

CONTEXT: The concern regarding cancer risk has resulted in the recommendation to pull calcitonin nasal spray (CNS) from the market. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a nested case-control study to evaluate the association between CNS use in osteoporosis patients in Taiwan and their subsequent risk of cancer. DESIGN: This was a population-based nested case-control study. SETTING: Data were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort consisted of 28 222 patients diagnosed with osteoporosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011. We identified 1925 cancer patients as the study group and 2 noncancer patients frequency matched according to age at index date, sex, comorbidity, index-year, and osteoporosis-year as the control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Use of CNS in women with osteoporosis significantly increased the risk of liver cancer (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.23-3.05) but decreased the risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.15-0.80). Further analysis of monthly CNS dosages showed that the association between CNS and liver cancer is limited to higher-dose users. CONCLUSION: The findings of this population-based nested case-control study suggest that CNS use might increase the risk of liver cancer in female osteoporosis patients but decrease the risk of breast cancer. Our data do not completely support the decision to discontinue use of CNS in osteoporosis patients.

Efficacy and safety of oral recombinant calcitonin tablets in postmenopausal women with low bone mass and increased fracture risk: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: The effect of an investigational oral calcitonin tablet upon bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was investigated in postmenopausal women with low bone mass and at increased risk of fracture. Compared to placebo, calcitonin tablets increased lumbar spine BMD. This agent may provide an additional choice for patients. INTRODUCTION: An investigational oral salmon calcitonin preparation was previously shown to increase lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Our objective was to evaluate the use of this agent in postmenopausal women with low bone mass and at increased fracture risk but not meeting BMD criteria for osteoporosis. METHODS: Treatment-naïve women were randomized to receive oral recombinant salmon calcitonin tablets or placebo once daily for 1 year. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and at study weeks 28 and 54. CTx-1, a bone resorption marker, was obtained at the same time points. Subjects returned periodically for tolerability assessment and adverse event (AE) recording. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine women in the USA were randomized, 86 to calcitonin and 43 to placebo. Calcitonin recipients experienced a significant increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD; the difference compared with placebo was significant. Dosing at bedtime or with dinner was equally effective. CTx-1 was suppressed in calcitonin recipients but not in placebo subjects. Gastrointestinal AEs were common, but the overall safety profile was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral calcitonin may provide a useful therapeutic alternative for some women with low bone mass.

Incidence and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw among the Taiwan osteoporosis population.

UNLABELLED: Evidence of the incidence and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in Asian osteoporosis populations receiving different osteoporosis medications is lacking. We found that there is no excess incidence of or risk for ONJ in osteoporosis patients >50 years old using alendronate as compared with patients using raloxifene or calcitonin under real-world conditions in Taiwan. INTRODUCTION: To provide information on ONJ in Asian populations, this study compares the incidence and risk of ONJ between patients receiving alendronate and those receiving non-bisphosphonate osteoporosis medications in Taiwan. METHODS: Enrollees in the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2003 to 2007, aged above 50 years, with vertebral/hip fracture, and new to osteoporosis therapy were recruited. Patients with Paget's disease or cancer during the baseline period were excluded. Patients were classified into either the alendronate or the calcitonin/raloxifene (control) group according to their exposure during follow-up. Previously proposed possible ONJ diagnosis codes were adopted as potential ONJ cases, but qualifying cases also had a repeated ONJ diagnosis within 8 weeks of the first diagnosis and received one or more broad-spectrum oral antibiotics. Cox modeling compared the risk of ONJ between the alendronate and the control groups, which were matched using propensity scores. Results were examined in series sensitivity analyses, including different cumulative dose groups. RESULTS: We found 25 potential ONJ cases in the alendronate (N = 18,030) and 21 in the control groups (N = 25,615). Over the 6-year follow-up period, no increased risk of ONJ in the alendronate group in the original (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47-1.58) or propensity score-matched cohorts (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.44-1.69) was found. All comparison groups exhibited a similar incidence of ONJ, ranging from 6.9 to 8.2/10,000 person-years. CONCLUSION: Under real-world conditions, there is no excess risk for ONJ in osteoporosis patients >50 years old using alendronate as compared with patients using raloxifene or calcitonin.

Salmon calcitonin use and associated cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the strength of evidence supporting a possible association between salmon calcitonin (SCT) use and cancer incidence. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, and EMBASE (January 1973 to September 2013) were performed using the key search terms salmon calcitonin, humans, nasal calcitonin, and (for EMBASE only) randomized controlled trial. We also performed a manual review of data reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) committee in 2013. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated and all information deemed relevant was included for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intranasal and injectable SCT are FDA-approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. After a safety signal suggested a possible link between SCT use and prostate cancer, the European Medicines Agency and FDA regulatory agencies conducted analyses of SCT randomized controlled trial data to assess cancer-related adverse events and to readdress the approval status of SCT. Eighteen studies were found that compared nasal or oral SCT and placebo. In 15 of the 18 studies, the percentage of malignancy was greater in the SCT arm. The studies varied in quality, outcomes, and length. Most of the studies had poor-quality methods to assess new cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence may suggest an association between SCT use and cancer incidence based on studies with poor-quality cancer assessment methods. However, considering the lack of demonstrated efficacy of SCT to reduce fractures, clinicians should consider discontinuing its use for osteoporosis treatment regardless of the FDA's final approval decision.

Safety concerns with the long-term management of osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic disease that exerts a significant burden on both individuals and the community. Hence, there is a requirement for long-term treatment to be associated with a positive benefit-risk balance. AREAS COVERED: In this descriptive review, the long-term safety of calcitonin, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), bisphosphonates, denosumab and strontium ranelate was reviewed based on randomized controlled trials of 3 years or longer supplemented by extension study data and data from large, observational studies. EXPERT OPINION: Rare adverse events become apparent with all currently available treatments for osteoporosis with long-term therapy. Due to the rarity of these adverse events and to the worldwide burden of osteoporosis, the benefit-risk balance remains in favor of the beneficial effects of treatment on an outcome rather than the probability of an adverse effect. No single antiosteoporosis agent is appropriate for all patients. Treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis, taking into account the relative benefits and risks in different patient populations.

Prevention of osteoporosis: one step forward, two steps back.

For many years, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was the mainstay for osteoporosis prevention in postmenopausal women until a large randomized clinical trial raised serious safety concerns. This resulted in a big drop in HRT use and its demotion by regulatory authorities to second-line treatment. Many clinicians now feel that HRT is not safe to use, and recommend various alternatives for the treatment of osteoporosis. But how effective are these alternative therapies, are they any safer than HRT, and how do their costs compare? This review questions the validity of the safety concerns about HRT, and highlights the safety concerns about alternative therapies. It concludes that HRT is as safe as the other treatment options, and its efficacy and low cost demand that it be restored as a first-line treatment for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Other therapies are available for use in osteoporosis, and the bisphosphonates are particularly effective for the treatment of the established disease. However, they must be used selectively and with caution, and are best restricted to those patients who are elderly or have severe disease. New treatments are emerging, but again caution must be taken until any long-term adverse effects have been identified.

Efficacy and harms of nasal calcitonin in improving bone density in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVES: There are very few published studies of agents having the potential to improve bone health in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The objective of this study was to establish the efficacy and safety of intranasal calcitonin in improving bone mineral density (BMD) in young patients with IBD and to define additional factors that impact bone mineral accrual. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial in 63 participants, ages 8-21 years, with a spinal BMD Z-score ≤ -1.0 s.d. measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Subjects were randomized to 200 IU intranasal calcitonin (n=31) or placebo (n=32) daily. All received age-appropriate calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Subsequent BMD measurements were obtained at 9 and 18 months. RESULTS: Intranasal calcitonin was well tolerated. Adverse event frequency was similar in both treatment groups, and such events were primarily minor, reversible, and limited to the upper respiratory tract. The BMD Z-score change documented at screening and 9 months and screening and 18 months did not differ between the two therapeutic arms. In participants with Crohn's disease, the spinal BMD Z-score improved between screening and 9 months (change in spine BMD Z-score (ΔZSBMD)(9-0)) in the calcitonin group (ΔZSBMD(9-0)(calcitonin)=0.21 (0.37), ΔZSBMD(9-0)(placebo)=-0.15 (0.5), P=0.02); however, this was only a secondary subgroup analysis. Bone mineral accrual rate during the trial did not lead to normalization of BMD Z-score in this cohort. Factors favoring higher bone mineral accrual rate were lower baseline BMD and higher baseline body mass index Z-score, improvement in height Z-score, higher serum albumin, hematocrit and iron concentration, and more hours of weekly weight-bearing activity. Factors associated with lower bone mineral accrual rate were more severe disease-as indicated by elevated inflammatory markers, need for surgery, hospitalization, and the use of immunomodulators-and higher daily caffeine intake. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal calcitonin is well tolerated but does not offer a long-term advantage in youth with IBD and decreased BMD. Bone mineral accrual rate remains compromised in youth with IBD and low BMD raising concerns for long-term bone health outcomes. Improvement in nutritional status, catch-up linear growth, control of inflammation, increase in weight-bearing activity, and lower daily caffeine intake may be helpful in restoring bone density in children with IBD and low BMD.