Efficacy and safety of Dynavisc® gel in prevention of scar adhesions recurrence after flexor tendons tenolysis in zone 2. Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

AIM: Dynavisc® is a novel surgical product made of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and Polyethylene Oxide (PEO) designed to reduce post-surgical adhesions in tendons surgery. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of the Dynavisc® gel in reducing post-surgical adhesions after flexor tenolysis in zone 2. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Thirty-one patients suffering from stiff finger after flexor tendon repairs in zone 2 treated with standard release with (18 Dynavisc®-treated group) or without (13 controls) anti-adhesion gel application into the flexor tendon sheath and around the site of the tenolysis, were collected in five different hand surgery units. Safety profile and functional outcomes (based on TAM test and the The Quick-DASH questionnaire) were examined from patients' charts and analyzed. RESULTS: The application of Dynavisc® posed no safety concerns and it was not related to any additional complication. The Dynavisc®-treated group showed greater progressive improvement of TAM value in all visits with superior TAM value at T(90) and T(180) compared to the control group. DISCUSSION: Tendon adhesions are the main cause of flexor tendon surgery failure. Multiple strategies (i.e. robust tendon repair, early rehabilitation and lubricant or barrier agents) have been proposed to minimize their formation. Among different products described in the literature Dynavisc® showed a significant role in limiting adhesions formation in a recent experimental study. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study confirm the safety of Dynavisc® gel application in hand surgery demonstrating its potential long-term benefits after flexor tendon tenolysis. KEY WORDS: Flexor Tendon Repair, Tendon Adhesions, Tenolysis.

Randomized trial of neoadjuvant vaccination with tumor-cell lysate induces T cell response in low-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUNDLong-term prognosis of WHO grade II low-grade gliomas (LGGs) is poor, with a high risk of recurrence and malignant transformation into high-grade gliomas. Given the relatively intact immune system of patients with LGGs and the slow tumor growth rate, vaccines are an attractive treatment strategy.METHODSWe conducted a pilot study to evaluate the safety and immunological effects of vaccination with GBM6-AD, lysate of an allogeneic glioblastoma stem cell line, with poly-ICLC in patients with LGGs. Patients were randomized to receive the vaccines before surgery (arm 1) or not (arm 2) and all patients received adjuvant vaccines. Coprimary outcomes were to evaluate safety and immune response in the tumor.RESULTSA total of 17 eligible patients were enrolled - 9 in arm 1 and 8 in arm 2. This regimen was well tolerated with no regimen-limiting toxicity. Neoadjuvant vaccination induced upregulation of type-1 cytokines and chemokines and increased activated CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood. Single-cell RNA/T cell receptor sequencing detected CD8+ T cell clones that expanded with effector phenotype and migrated into the tumor microenvironment (TME) in response to neoadjuvant vaccination. Mass cytometric analyses detected increased tissue resident-like CD8+ T cells with effector memory phenotype in the TME after the neoadjuvant vaccination.CONCLUSIONThe regimen induced effector CD8+ T cell response in peripheral blood and enabled vaccine-reactive CD8+ T cells to migrate into the TME. Further refinements of the regimen may have to be integrated into future strategies.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02549833.FUNDINGNIH (1R35NS105068, 1R21CA233856), Dabbiere Foundation, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science.

Effectiveness of Semiocclusive Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose Fibers and Hydrocolloid Dressings for Irritant Peristomal Dermatitis: A Case Series.

ABSTRACT: The most common complication in individuals with ostomies is irritant contact dermatitis from the acidic stoma effluent coming into contact with the peristomal skin. Although protective powders are widely used for the treatment of peristomal skin, there is little scientific evidence to justify their use. The combined use of sodium carboxymethylcellulose cellulose fibers (SCCFs) together with a hydrocolloid dressing for fixation is an effective alternative in the management of these wounds. Here, the authors report a case series of three patients presenting at a stoma therapy clinic with peristomal skin lesions because of severe irritant contact dermatitis. Patients were men aged between 70 and 81 years, had been diagnosed with colon cancer (n = 2) or bladder cancer (n = 1), and had undergone a colostomy (n = 1), ileostomy (n = 1), or Bricker-type ureteroileostomy (n = 1). A semiocclusive care protocol was applied in a moist environment using SCCF and an extrathin hydrocolloid adhesive dressing, and the collection device was secured using adhesive resin and an ostomy belt. The combined use of SCCF and hydrocolloid dressings provided beneficial results to treat the dermatitis, with reduced discomfort after 7 days and lesions healing within 4 weeks.

Ameliorative effects of fisetin in letrozole-induced rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to investigate the therapeutic effects of a potent polyphenol, fisetin, on the letrozole-induced rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four female Wistar rats (42 days old) were divided into four groups: control group (received carboxy methylcellulose (CMC 0.5 %)), PCOS group treated with letrozole (1 mg/kg), fisetin group received same dose of letrozole + fisetin (10 mg/kg), and metformin group received same dose of letrozole + metformin (300 mg/kg). At the end of the experiment, biochemical (glucose, lipid profile) and hormonal (insulin, testosterone, estradiol, and progesterone) parameters were analyzed. Histological examinations of ovaries were also conducted by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blotting were carried out for cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17A1), sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), and 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) gene expression in the ovaries. Furthermore, enzymatic activities of antioxidants including catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in the ovaries were analyzed by colorimetric method. RESULTS: Letrozole administration resulted in a remarkable abnormality in biochemical and hormonal parameters. Fisetin normalized levels of glucose, lipid profile, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), testosterone, estradiol, and progesterone. Moreover, fisetin increased expression levels of SIRT1 and AMPK, and decreased expression level of CYP17A1 in the ovaries. Additionally, fisetin showed protective effect by enhancing antioxidant activities of CAT, SOD, and GPx depleted secondary to induction of PCOS. Fisetin effects were comparable to metformin, as the standard drug used for treatment of PCOS. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that, fisetin treatment caused significant alleviating effects by restoring PCOS-induced alterations in the key genes involved in energy homeostasis and antioxidant enzymes, suggesting that it may have a key role in combating with PCOS.

Trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a melanoma helper peptide vaccine plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant, cyclophosphamide, and polyICLC (Mel63).

BACKGROUND: Peptide vaccines designed to stimulate melanoma-reactive CD4+ T cells can induce T cell and antibody (Ab) responses, associated with enhanced overall survival. We hypothesized that adding toll-like receptor 3 agonist polyICLC to an incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) would be safe and would support strong, durable CD4+ T cell and Ab responses. We also hypothesized that oral low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCy) would be safe, would reduce circulating regulatory T cells (T-regs) and would further enhance immunogenicity. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: An adaptive design based on toxicity and durable CD4+ T cell immune response (dRsp) was used to assign participants with resected stage IIA-IV melanoma to one of four study regimens. The regimens included a vaccine comprising six melanoma peptides restricted by Class II MHC (6MHP) in an emulsion with IFA alone (Arm A), with IFA plus systemic mCy (Arm B), with IFA+ local polyICLC (Arm C), or with IFA+ polyICLC+ mCy (Arm D). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE V.4.03). T cell responses were measured by interferon γ ELIspot assay ex vivo. Serum Ab responses to 6MHP were measured by ELISA. Circulating T-regs were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Forty-eight eligible participants were enrolled and treated. Early data on safety and dRsp favored enrollment on arm D. Total enrollment on Arms A-D were 3, 7, 6, and 32, respectively. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 1/7 (14%) participants on arm B and 2/32 (6%) on arm D. None exceeded the 25% DLT threshold for early closure to enrollment for any arm. Strong durable T cell responses to 6MHP were detected ex vivo in 0%, 29%, 67%, and 47% of participants on arms A-D, respectively. IgG Ab responses were greatest for arms C and D. Circulating T-regs frequencies were not altered by mCy. CONCLUSIONS: 6MHP vaccines administered with IFA, polyICLC, and mCy were well tolerated. The dRsp rate for arm D of 47% (90% CI 32 to 63) exceeded the 18% (90% CI 11 to 26) rate previously observed with 6MHP in IFA alone. Vaccination with IFA+ polyICLC (arm C) also showed promise for enhancing T cell and Ab responses.

Effect of sodium hyaluronate-arboxycellulose membrane (Seprafilm®) on postoperative small bowel obstruction: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of Seprafilm® on postoperative small bowel obstruction. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed and EMBASE databases through August 2020. The pooled risk ratios as well as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 9 clinical control trials involving 4,351 patients (2,123 in the Seprafilm® group and 2,228 in the control group) were included. The overall analysis showed that the pooled risk ratio was 0.45 (95% confidence interval = 0.34-0.60; P < .00001), indicating that the risk of postoperative small bowel obstruction can be significantly decreased by the application of Seprafilm®. Similarly, an obvious effect of Seprafilm® on reducing the rate of postoperative small bowel obstruction was also shown in the subgroup analyses by population (adult participants), study design (randomized control study or nonrandomized control study), region (Japan or Korea), follow-up duration (2 years or 5 years), and sheet number of Seprafilm® (1 sheet or >1 sheet). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of Seprafilm® is beneficial for decreasing the rate of postoperative small bowel obstruction.

Learning curve analysis of applying Seprafilm hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose membrane during laparoscopic hysterectomy.

This study was designed to evaluate the learning curve of applying Seprafilm (modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose; Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA) during laparoscopic hysterectomy or subtotal hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy. In this retrospective cohort study, 35 patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy or subtotal hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy were enrolled. The Seprafilm was cut into 4 pieces, rolled up with a trimmed plastic sleeve and delivered through an incision wound made for the 5-mm ancillary trocar. The membrane was unrolled and placed on the rough surface after hysterectomy or subtotal hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy. The time from the insertion of the first piece of membrane into the abdominal cavity to the complete removal of the trimmed plastic sleeve was recorded. The median time for Seprafilm placement was 3 min. The learning curve was analyzed using the power-law method and suggested that 10 cases were required to achieve proficiency in the procedure. The presence of adnexectomy was significantly associated with the time required for Seprafilm placement (P < 0.001). Although Seprafilm placement is more complicated compared to the liquid and gel forms of anti-adhesion barriers, surgical proficiency seemed to be attained after 10 cases for an experienced surgeon.

The effects of poloxamer and sodium alginate mixture (Guardix-SG®) on range of motion after axillary lymph node dissection: A single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study.

PURPOSE: Restricted shoulder mobility is a major upper extremity dysfunction associated with lower quality of life and disability after breast cancer surgery. We hypothesized that a poloxamer and sodium alginate mixture (Guardix-SG®) applied after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) would significantly improve shoulder range of motion (ROM) in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, prospective study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Guardix-SG® for the prevention of upper extremity dysfunction after ALND. The primary outcome measure was shoulder ROM at baseline (T0) and 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3) after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score(DASH), pain associated with movement, which was assessed using a numeric rating scale, and lymphedema assessed using body composition analyzer. RESULTS: A total of 83 women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to either the Guardix-SG® group or the control group. In the Guardix-SG® group (n = 37), Guardix-SG® was applied to the axillary region after ALND. In the control group (n = 46), ALND was performed without using Guardix-SG®. Comparing ROM for shoulder flexion before surgery (178.2°) and 12 months after surgery (172.3°), that was restored 12 months after surgery in the Guardix-SG® group, and there was no statistically significant difference between that at before surgery and 12 months after surgery (p = 0.182). No adverse effect was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have shown that Guardix-SG® help improve shoulder ROM without causing adverse effects in patients who underwent breast cancer surgery. However, there was no statistically significant difference from the control group. A further large-scale study is needed to obtain a more conclusive conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRISKCT0003386; https://cris.nih.go.kr (20181207).

Topical treatment for facial burns.

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries are an important health problem. They occur frequently in the head and neck region. The face is the area central to a person's identity that provides our most expressive means of communication. Topical interventions are currently the cornerstone of treatment of burns to the face. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of topical interventions on wound healing in people with facial burns of any depth. SEARCH METHODS: In December 2019 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of topical treatment for facial burns were eligible for inclusion in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and GRADE assessment of the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: In this first update, we included 12 RCTs, comprising 507 participants. Most trials included adults admitted to specialised burn centres after recent burn injuries. Topical agents included antimicrobial agents (silver sulphadiazine (SSD), Aquacel-Ag, cerium-sulphadiazine, gentamicin cream, mafenide acetate cream, bacitracin), non-antimicrobial agents (Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO), saline-soaked dressings, skin substitutes (including bioengineered skin substitute (TransCyte), allograft, and xenograft (porcine Xenoderm), and miscellaneous treatments (growth hormone therapy, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor hydrogel (rhGMCS)), enzymatic debridement, and cream with Helix Aspersa extract). Almost all the evidence included in this review was assessed as low or very low-certainty, often because of high risk of bias due to unclear randomisation procedures (i.e. sequence generation and allocation concealment); lack of blinding of participants, providers and sometimes outcome assessors; and imprecision resulting from few participants, low event rates or both, often in single studies. Topical antimicrobial agents versus topical non-antimicrobial agents There is moderate-certainty evidence that there is probably little or no difference between antimicrobial agents and non-antimicrobial agents (SSD and MEBO) in time to complete wound healing (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.85, 1 study, 39 participants). Topical antimicrobial agents may make little or no difference to the proportion of wounds completely healed compared with topical non-antimicrobial agents (comparison SSD and MEBO, risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.29; 1 study, 39 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether there is a difference in wound infection (comparison topical antimicrobial agent (Aquacel-Ag) and MEBO; RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.21; 1 study, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No trials reported change in wound surface area over time or partial wound healing. There is low-certainty evidence for the secondary outcomes scar quality and patient satisfaction. Two studies assessed pain but it was incompletely reported. Topical antimicrobial agents versus other topical antimicrobial agents It is uncertain whether topical antimicrobial agents make any difference in effects as the evidence is low to very low-certainty. For primary outcomes, there is low-certainty evidence for time to partial (i.e. greater than 90%) wound healing (comparison SSD versus cerium SSD: mean difference (MD) -7.10 days, 95% CI -16.43 to 2.23; 1 study, 142 participants). There is very low-certainty evidence regarding whether topical antimicrobial agents make a difference to wound infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; 1 study, 15 participants). There is low to very low-certainty evidence for the proportion of facial burns requiring surgery, pain, scar quality, adverse effects and length of hospital stay. Skin substitutes versus topical antimicrobial agents There is low-certainty evidence that a skin substitute may slightly reduce time to partial (i.e. greater than 90%) wound healing, compared with a non-specified antibacterial agent (MD -6.00 days, 95% CI -8.69 to -3.31; 1 study, 34 participants). We are uncertain whether skin substitutes in general make any other difference in effects as the evidence is very low certainty. Outcomes included wound infection, pain, scar quality, adverse effects of treatment and length of hospital stay. Single studies showed contrasting low-certainty evidence. A bioengineered skin substitute may slightly reduce procedural pain (MD -4.00, 95% CI -5.05 to -2.95; 34 participants) and background pain (MD -2.00, 95% CI -3.05 to -0.95; 34 participants) compared with an unspecified antimicrobial agent. In contrast, a biological dressing (porcine Xenoderm) might slightly increase pain in superficial burns (MD 1.20, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.75; 15 participants (30 wounds)) as well as deep partial thickness burns (MD 3.00, 95% CI 2.34 to 3.66; 10 participants (20 wounds)), compared with antimicrobial agents (Physiotulle Ag (Coloplast)). Miscellaneous treatments versus miscellaneous treatments Single studies show low to very low-certainty effects of interventions. Low-certainty evidence shows that MEBO may slightly reduce time to complete wound healing compared with saline soaked dressing (MD -1.7 days, 95% CI -3.32 to -0.08; 40 participants). In addition, a cream containing Helix Aspersa may slightly increase the proportion of wounds completely healed at 14 days compared with MEBO (RR 4.77, 95% CI 1.87 to 12.15; 43 participants). We are uncertain whether any miscellaneous treatment in the included studies makes a difference in effects for the outcomes wound infection, scar quality, pain and patient satisfaction as the evidence is low to very low-certainty. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is mainly low to very low-certainty evidence on the effects of any topical intervention on wound healing in people with facial burns. The number of RCTs in burn care is growing, but the body of evidence is still hampered due to an insufficient number of studies that follow appropriate evidence-based standards of conducting and reporting RCTs.

Voice outcome after vocal fold injection augmentation with carboxymethyl cellulose versus calcium hydroxyapatite.

BACKGROUND: Vocal fold injection augmentation is a recognised treatment modality for glottic insufficiency. Causes of glottal closure insufficiency include vocal fold paralysis, paresis, atrophy, sulcus vocalis, scarring and vocal fold deficiency after laryngeal surgery. A variety of materials exist for injection augmentation. This study aimed to compare voice improvement after injection augmentation between two injectable materials: carboxymethyl cellulose and calcium hydroxyapatite. METHOD: This retrospective study included 66 consecutive patients with glottic insufficiency who underwent injection augmentation. RESULTS: Among the patients who received their first injection augmentation with carboxymethyl cellulose and their second injection augmentation with calcium hydroxyapatite (n = 28), voice quality improved significantly after both injection augmentations. No significant differences were observed in any of the objective and subjective voice quality measurements examined following carboxymethyl cellulose and calcium hydroxyapatite injections. CONCLUSION: Voice improvement after injection augmentation depends mainly on the improvement of glottic closure, rather than the injection material.

A phase I study of multi-HLA-binding peptides derived from heat shock protein 70/glypican-3 and a novel combination adjuvant of hLAG-3Ig and Poly-ICLC for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers: YNP01 trial.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study aimed to evaluate the safety, peptide-specific immune responses, and anti-tumor effects of a novel vaccination therapy comprising multi-HLA-binding heat shock protein (HSP) 70/glypican-3 (GPC3) peptides and a novel adjuvant combination of hLAG-3Ig and Poly-ICLC against metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: HSP70/GPC3 peptides with high binding affinities for three HLA types (A*24:02, A*02:01, and A*02:06) were identified with our peptide prediction system. The peptides were intradermally administered with combined adjuvants on a weekly basis. This study was a phase I dose escalation clinical trial, which was carried out in a three patients' cohort; in total, 11 patients were enrolled for the recommended dose. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received this vaccination therapy without dose-limiting toxicity. All treatment-related adverse events were of grades 1 to 2. Peptide-specific CTL induction by HSP70 and GPC3 proteins was observed in 11 (64.7%) and 13 (76.5%) cases, respectively, regardless of the HLA type. Serum tumor marker levels were decreased in 10 cases (58.8%). Immunological analysis using PBMCs indicated that patients receiving dose level 3 presented with significantly reduced T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM3)-expressing CD4 + T cells after one course of treatment. PD-1 or TIM3-expressing CD4 + T cells and T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT)-expressing CD8 + T cells in PBMCs before vaccination were negative predictive factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: This novel peptide vaccination therapy was safe for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.

Changes in conjunctival epithelial cells after treatment with 0.2% xanthan gum eye drops in mild-moderate dry eye.

PURPOSE: To study the effects of xanthan gum eye drops on the ocular surface and conjunctival cytology of patients with mild-moderate dry eye. METHODS: This prospective, double-masked, controlled trial included 30 patients (age > 60 and Ocular Surface Disease Index score >12 and <33), divided into two groups of 15 subjects and treated with 0.2% xanthan gum eye drops (group 1) or 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (group 2) qid. After a run-in period with saline qid, patients were evaluated by Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, clinical assessment, and impression cytology at baseline (T0) and after 1 month (T1). For impression cytology, cellularity, cell-to-cell contacts, nucleus/cytoplasm ratio, chromatin aspect, goblet cells distribution, keratinization, and the presence of inflammatory cells were considered. Parameters were scored from 0 (no alterations) to 3 (evident alterations). For statistical analysis, Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used. RESULTS: Clinically, after 1 month of treatment, group 1 showed an improvement of corneal stain (T0 = 1.1 ± 1.4; T1 = 0.5 ± 0.7; p = 0.03) and a reduction of Schirmer I test (T0 = 9.8 ± 6.1; T1 = 5.9 ± 4.1; p = 0.001). In group 2, no differences were found between T0 and T1 for all the clinical tests. For impression cytology, in group 1 cellularity (T0 = 0.6 ± 0.5; T1 = 0.3 ± 0.5; p = 0.05), chromatin aspect (T0 = 1.2 ± 0.4; T1 = 0.8 ± 0.5; p = 0.01), keratinization (T0 = 1 ± 0.7; T1 = 0.5 ± 0.5; p = 0.03), and total score (T0 = 5.8 ± 1.3; T1 = 3.6 ± 1.7; p = 0.003) were significantly ameliorated, while in group 2 only total score improved significantly (T0 = 5 ± 1.4; T1 = 4.3 ± 1.5; p = 0.01). The comparison between groups showed significant amelioration for keratinization in group 1 at T1 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The treatment with xanthan gum, a molecule with anti-oxidant and mucoadhesive properties, ameliorated conjunctival epithelium of mild-moderate dry eye patients better than carboxymethylcellulose.

Preclinical bioassay of a novel antibacterial mesh for the repair of abdominal hernia defects.

BACKGROUND: In hernia surgery, soaking of meshes in antibiotics before implantation is a prophylactic strategy for minimizing the risk of infection while providing minimal, local, drug doses. This study describes the development and application of an antibacterial mesh coating comprising a carboxymethylcellulose gel loaded with rifampicin in a preclinical model of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis infection in rabbits. METHODS: Antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility (with fibroblasts) of unloaded carboxymethylcellulose gel and 0.13 mg/mL rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose gel were assessed in vitro. Then, partial abdominal wall defects (5 × 2 cm) were created in New Zealand white rabbits (n = 34), the wound inoculated with 0.25 mL of 106 CFU Staphylococcus aureus/ S. epidermidis (n = 17 each), and the defect then repaired with a lightweight, monofilament, large pore polypropylene mesh either uncoated (n = 3) or coated with carboxymethylcellulose gel (n = 7) or rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose gel (n = 7). By postoperative day 14, coating performance was evaluated by determining bacterial adhesion (via sonication), host tissue incorporation (via histology), macrophage response via immunostaining), and bloodstream drug diffusion (via high-performance liquid chromatography). RESULTS: In vitro, rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose gel demonstrated great activity against Staphylococcus aureus/S. epidermidis, while being innocuous for fibroblasts. In vivo, rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose gel-coated implants displayed full bacterial clearance and optimal tissue integration, irrespective of the strain of Staphylococcus. In contrast, uncoated and carboxymethylcellulose gel-coated implants exhibited macro/microscopic signs of infection and impaired tissue integration. Macrophage responses were less in rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose gel implants than in uncoated mesh (Staphylococcus aureus/S. epidermidis; P < .01) and carboxymethylcellulose gel (S. epidermidis; P < .05) implants. Bloodstream levels of rifampicin were undetectable. CONCLUSION: Soaking meshes in rifampicin-carboxymethylcellulose gel inhibited effectively the bacterial adhesion to the mesh without compromising the tissue repair. This antibiotic gel constitutes an easy-to-use and effective prophylactic strategy that potentially reduce the prevalence of postoperative mesh infection.

Combined Vaccination with NY-ESO-1 Protein, Poly-ICLC, and Montanide Improves Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Patients with High-Risk Melanoma.

Given its ability to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses, NY-ESO-1 has been considered a suitable antigen for a cancer vaccine. Despite promising results from early-phase clinical studies in patients with melanoma, NY-ESO-1 vaccine immunotherapy has not been widely investigated in larger trials; consequently, many questions remain as to the optimal vaccine formulation, predictive biomarkers, and sequencing and timing of vaccines in melanoma treatment. We conducted an adjuvant phase I/II clinical trial in high-risk resected melanoma to optimize the delivery of poly-ICLC, a TLR-3/MDA-5 agonist, as a component of vaccine formulation. A phase I dose-escalation part was undertaken to identify the MTD of poly-ICLC administered in combination with NY-ESO-1 and montanide. This was followed by a randomized phase II part investigating the MTD of poly-ICLC with NY-ESO-1 with or without montanide. The vaccine regimens were generally well tolerated, with no treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Both regimens induced integrated NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ T-cell and humoral responses. CD8+ T-cell responses were mainly detected in patients receiving montanide. T-cell avidity toward NY-ESO-1 peptides was higher in patients vaccinated with montanide. In conclusion, NY-ESO-1 protein in combination with poly-ICLC is safe, well tolerated, and capable of inducing integrated antibody and CD4+ T-cell responses in most patients. Combination with montanide enhances antigen-specific T-cell avidity and CD8+ T-cell cross-priming in a fraction of patients, indicating that montanide contributes to the induction of specific CD8+ T-cell responses to NY-ESO-1.

A multipeptide vaccine plus toll-like receptor agonists LPS or polyICLC in combination with incomplete Freund's adjuvant in melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Cancer vaccines require adjuvants to induce effective immune responses; however, there is no consensus on optimal adjuvants. We hypothesized that toll-like receptor (TLR)3 agonist polyICLC or TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), combined with CD4 T cell activation, would support strong and durable CD8+ T cell responses, whereas addition of an incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) would reduce magnitude and persistence of immune responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants with resected stage IIB-IV melanoma received a vaccine comprised of 12 melanoma peptides restricted by Class I MHC (12MP), plus a tetanus helper peptide (Tet). Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to cohort 1 (LPS dose-escalation) or cohort 2 (polyICLC). Each cohort included 3 subgroups (a-c), receiving 12MP + Tet + TLR agonist without IFA (0), or with IFA in vaccine one (V1), or all six vaccines (V6). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE v4). T cell responses were measured with IFNγ ELIspot assay ex vivo or after one in vitro stimulation (IVS). RESULTS: Fifty-three eligible patients were enrolled, of which fifty-one were treated. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 0/33 patients in cohort 1 and in 2/18 patients in cohort 2 (11%). CD8 T cell responses to 12MP were detected ex vivo in cohort 1 (42%) and in cohort 2 (56%) and in 18, 50, and 72% for subgroups V0, V1, and V6, respectively. T cell responses to melanoma peptides were more durable and of highest magnitude for IFA V6. CONCLUSIONS: LPS and polyICLC are safe and effective vaccine adjuvants when combined with IFA. Contrary to the central hypothesis, IFA enhanced T cell responses to peptide vaccines when added to TLR agonists. Future studies will aim to understand mechanisms underlying the favorable effects with IFA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial Mel58 was performed with IRB (#15781) and FDA approval and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on April 25, 2012 (NCT01585350). Patients provided written informed consent to participate. Enrollment started on June 24, 2012.

Therapeutic Effect of Irreversible Electroporation in Combination with Poly-ICLC Adjuvant in Preclinical Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) combined with the intratumoral injection of the immunogenic adjuvant poly-ICLC (polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid and poly-L-lysine, a dsRNA analog mimicking viral RNA) inmediately before IRE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice and rabbits bearing hepatocellular carcinoma tumors (Hepa.129 and VX2 tumor models, respectively) were treated with IRE (2 pulses of 2500V), with poly-ICLC, or with IRE + poly-ICLC combination therapy. Tumor growth in mice was monitored using a digital caliper and by computed tomography in rabbits. RESULTS: Intratumoral administration of poly-ICLC immediately before IRE elicited shrinkage of Hepa.129 cell-derived tumors in 70% of mice, compared to 30% and 26% by poly-ICLC or IRE alone, respectively (P = .0004). This combined therapy induced the shrinkage of VX-2-based hepatocellular carcinoma tumors in 40% of rabbits, whereas no response was achieved by either individual treatment (P = .045). The combined therapy activated a systemic antitumor response able to inhibit the growth of other untreated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: IRE treatment, immediately preceded by the intratumoral administration of an immunogenic adjuvant such as poly-ICLC, might enhance the antitumor effect of the IRE procedure. This combination might facilitate the induction of a long-term systemic response to prevent tumor relapses and the appearance of metastases.

Application of hyaluronic acid/carboxymethyl cellulose membrane for early continence after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: To assess whether application of a hyaluronic acid-carboxymethyl cellulose membrane (HA/CMC) to the prostate bed and neurovascular plate facilitated early return of continence after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: The subjects were 183 consecutive patients with organ-confined prostate cancer who underwent unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing RARP. After vesicourethral anastomosis, HA/CMC was placed to cover Denonvilliers' fascia (behind the anastomotic suture) and the preserved neurovascular plate. The time until complete continence after RARP and perioperative complications were compared between patients with or without HA/CMC. RESULTS: HA/CMC was applied in 13/46 patients (28.3%) receiving bilateral nerve-sparing surgery and 40/137 patients (29.2%) receiving unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. After bilateral nerve-sparing RARP, the median time until continence was significantly shorter in patients with HA/CMC than in those without HA/CMC (3.2 vs. 9.3 months, respectively, p < 0.01). After unilateral nerve-sparing RARP, the median time until continence was also significantly shorter in patients with HA/CMC than in those without HA/CMC (3.2 vs. 12.0 months, respectively, p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that an age < 70 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.80), institutional caseload > 200, (HR: 1.64, 95%CI: 1.10-2.47), and use of HA/CMC (HR: 1.84, 95%CI: 1.22-2.76) were independent predictors of early postoperative continence. Complication rates, including urinary leakage, did not differ significantly between patients with or without HA/CMC. CONCLUSION: Application of HA/CMC to the prostate bed and neurovascular plate resulted in significantly faster postoperative return of continence after both unilateral and bilateral nerve-sparing RARP.

Phase I/II trial testing safety and immunogenicity of the multipeptide IMA950/poly-ICLC vaccine in newly diagnosed adult malignant astrocytoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Peptide vaccines offer the opportunity to elicit glioma-specific T cells with tumor killing ability. Using antigens eluted from the surface of glioblastoma samples, we designed a phase I/II study to test safety and immunogenicity of the IMA950 multipeptide vaccine adjuvanted with poly-ICLC (polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with polylysine and carboxymethylcellulose) in human leukocyte antigen A2+ glioma patients. METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 16) and grade III astrocytoma (n = 3) were treated with radiochemotherapy followed by IMA950/poly-ICLC vaccination. The first 6 patients received IMA950 (9 major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class I and 2 MHC class II peptides) intradermally and poly-ICLC intramuscularly (i.m.). After protocol amendment, IMA950 and poly-ICLC were mixed and injected subcutaneously (n = 7) or i.m. (n = 6). Primary endpoints were safety and immunogenicity. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival at 6 and 9 months, and vaccine-specific peripheral cluster of differentiation (CD)4 and CD8 T-cell responses. RESULTS: The IMA950/poly-ICLC vaccine was safe and well tolerated. Four patients presented cerebral edema with rapid recovery. For the first 6 patients, vaccine-induced CD8 T-cell responses were restricted to a single peptide and CD4 responses were absent. After optimization of vaccine formulation, we observed multipeptide CD8 and sustained T helper 1 CD4 T-cell responses. For the entire cohort, CD8 T-cell responses to a single or multiple peptides were observed in 63.2% and 36.8% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 19 months for glioblastoma patients. CONCLUSION: We provide, in a clinical trial, using cell surface-presented antigens, insights into optimization of vaccines generating effector T cells for glioma patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01920191.

Insulin Sensitizers Modulate GnRH Receptor Expression in PCOS Rats.

BACKGROUND: Insulin sensitizers like metformin and pioglitazone are clinically used since last decades for the treatment of PCOS, but their efficacy and possible role in PCOS patients remains questionable. Also, the mechanism by which these insulin sensitizers show effect is not clear. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the effect of metformin and pioglitazone on leutinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone receptor mRNA expression, hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance in high fat diet induced and letrozole induced PCOS in rats. METHODS: Pre-pubertal female rats were divided into four groups: group I received normal pellet diet and group II, III and IV received high fat diet. After 105 d of dietary manipulation, metformin and pioglitazone treatment was given to group III and group IV animals respectively for 21 d. Similarly, adult female rats were divided into four groups: group I received 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and group II, III, IV received letrozole for 21 d. After 21 d of letrozole administration, metformin and pioglitazone treatment was given to group III and group IV animals respectively for 21 d. Oral glucose tolerance test, lipid profile, fasting glucose, insulin, estrus cycle, hormonal profile, ovary weight, leutinizing hormone receptor and follicle stimulating hormone receptor mRNA expression was measured. Polycystic ovarian morphology was assessed through histopathological changes of ovary. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Metformin and pioglitazone treatment improve both metabolic and reproductive parameters of PCOS including hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism. LH receptor and FSH receptor mRNA expression were altered by pioglitazone and metformin treatment.

Cobertura de hidrofibra com carboximetilcelulose (Aquacel Ag®) em pacientes queimados: Um relato de caso / Hydrofiber dressing with carboxymethylcellulose (Aquacel Ag®) in burn patients: A case report / Curativo de hidrofibra con carboximetilcelulosa (Aquacel Ag®) en pacientes quemados: Un relato de caso

Introdução: O tratamento de queimaduras sempre foi um grande desafio devido aos diferentes níveis de gravidade das lesões. Neste contexto, coberturas modernas a base de prata estão sendo cada vez mais utilizadas nesses pacientes. Relato de Caso: Descrever os benefícios do curativo Aquacel Ag® em lesões por queimadura de 2º grau profundo e 3º grau em paciente atendida na Unidade de Tratamento de Queimados em um hospital de referência em queimaduras e trauma. A paciente teve várias perdas de enxertia devido a quadros infecciosos, sendo a infecção uma das principais variáveis que atrasam a enxertia cutânea. Quando foi introduzido o Aquacel Ag® no tratamento, observou-se melhora da área a ser enxertada. O Aquacel Ag® em queimaduras parciais garantiu menor tempo de cicatrização, melhor resposta à dor, custo e efetividade em relação a outras coberturas, tempo de trabalho de enfermagem, maior conforto na hora da troca de curativo. Considerações Finais: O Aquacel Ag® mostrou-se uma boa escolha de cobertura para queimaduras de espessura parcial, um grande aliado para preparo de lesões de 3º grau para enxertia, além de promover outros benefícios ao paciente.

Introduction: The treatment of burns has always been a great challenge due to the different severity levels of the lesions. Taking this into consideration, modern silver-based wound dressings has been increasingly used in these patients. Case Report: To describe the benefits of the Aquacel Ag® dressing in burn lesions of 2nd and 3rd grade in patients treated at the Burn Treatment Unit in a reference hospital in burns and trauma. The patient had several grafting losses due to infectious conditions, with infection being one of the main variables that delay skin grafting. When Aquacel Ag® was introduced in the treatment, improvement of the area to be grafted was observed. The Aquacel Ag® in partial burns, guaranted a shorter healing time, better response to pain, cost and effectiveness in relation to other coverages, nursing work time, and greater comfort at the time of dressing change. Final Considerations: Aquacel Ag® has been shown to be a good choice of coverage for partial thickness burns, a great ally for the preparation of 3rd degree lesions for grafting, in addition to promoting other benefits to the patient.

Introducción: El tratamiento de quemaduras siempre ha sido un gran desafío debido a los diferentes niveles de gravedad de las lesiones. En este contexto, las cubiertas modernas a base de plata se están utilizando cada vez más en estos pacientes. Relato de Caso: Describir los beneficios del curativo Aquacel Ag® en lesiones por quemadura de 2º grado profundo y 3º grado en paciente atendida en la Unidad de Tratamiento de Quemados en un hospital referencia en quemaduras y trauma. La paciente tuvo varias pérdidas de injerto debido a cuadros infecciosos, siendo la infección una de las principales variables que retrasan la injerto cutáneo. Cuando se introdujo el Aquacel Ag® en el tratamiento, se observó una mejora del área a ser injertada. El Aquacel Ag® en quemaduras parciales garantizó un menor tiempo de cicatrización, mejor respuesta al dolor, costo y efectividad en relación a otras coberturas, tiempo de trabajo de enfermería, mayor confort a la hora del cambio de curativo. Consideraciones finales: Aquacel Ag® se mostró una buena elección de cobertura para quemaduras de espesor parcial, un gran aliado para la preparación de lesiones de 3º grado para injerto, además de promover otros beneficios al paciente.