Phylogenetic analysis of combined lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Breast cancer manifests in diverse forms, with particular reference to various cell types harboring different mutations and gene expression profiles. To elucidate the clonal relationship between cancer cells in tumors composed of both ductal and lobular phenotypes, two combined lobular and ductal carcinoma (CLDC) cases were analyzed, including one mixed ductal­lobular carcinoma (MDL) lesion, by direct sequencing of the mitochondrial DNA D­loop, digital PCR targeting of chromosomes 1q and 16q, as well as next­generation sequencing. DNA was extracted from formalin­fixed paraffin­embedded tissue sections of different histological types, including invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia, non­neoplastic mammary gland and extramammary organs, using laser­assisted microdissection. Mutations detected by the comprehensive cancer panel were validated by SYBR green allele­specific quantitative PCR (RRM1, AKT1, PIK3CA, RALGDS, EGFR, TP53, IL21R, DPYD, SGK1, CDH1, TIMP3 and KMT2C). CLDC, which shared the basic genetic alterations of 1q gain or 16q loss, progresses to invasive lobular or ductual carcinoma with the accumulation of further mutations. Cancer cells contained in an MDL lesion shared closely related genetic alterations, suggesting that these cells have the same origin, despite different histological features, namely 'lobular' or 'ductal'. By contrast, multiple lesions located away from the main tumor, diagnosed as CLDC (excluding an MDL lesion) were not always identical with different genetic alterations, despite being diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ. Thus, MDL should be defined as a distinct category separate from CLDC, whose components of 'lobular' and 'ductal' may have the same cellular origin.

American Registry of Pathology Expert Opinions: The Spectrum of Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: Diagnostic Features and Clinical Implications.

This review reflects a collaboration between the American Registry of Pathology (the publisher of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicles) and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It is part of a series of expert recommendations on topics encountered in daily practice. The authors, 4 pathologists with expertise in breast pathology and a breast surgeon with a clinical and research interest in lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), met by conference call in September 2019 to develop recommendations for evaluating and reporting LCIS. Herein, we summarize the diagnostic criteria of classic LCIS and LCIS subtypes according to the most recent WHO criteria, discuss how best to distinguish LCIS from ductal carcinoma in situ in problematic cases (including the uses and limitations of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry), and review outcome and management issues for patients with LCIS.

Expression changes of BIK in breast cancer tissues of different histological subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the expression levels of BIK in breast cancer (BC) tissues of different histological subtype and to delve into the participation of BIK in this type of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BIK and p-BIK (the phosphorylated form) protein expressions were tested by immunohistochemistry in BC tissue microarrays (Tumoral [n = 90] and adjacent [n = 40] tissues). RESULTS: The data revealed an overexpression of BIK in invasive ductal (Grades I, IIA, and IIB) and in lobular (Grades IIA and IIB) carcinomas compared to their respective adjacent tissues. By contrast, canalicular carcinoma (Grades I and IIB) and phyllodes tumors had very low expression levels of BIK. Only levels of p-BIK were shown to be increased in invasive ductal carcinoma (Grades I, IIA, and IIB). Meanwhile, quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis showed lower BIK levels in MCF-10A and MCF-7 cells than in MDA-MB-231 and human mammary epithelial cells. In agreement with this, BIK protein was shown to be overexpressed in MDA-MB 231 relative to MCF-7 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed an association between BIK expression and the BC tumor subtype under study, which could be related to different BIK functions in the BC subtypes.

OBJETIVO: Determinar el grado de expresión de BIK en tejidos de cáncer de mama de diferente subtipo histológico para ahondar en la participación de BIK en este tipo de cancer. MÉTODO: Por medio de inmunohistoquímica se determinó la expresión de BIK y de su forma fosforilada (p-BIK) en microarreglos de tejidos (tumores [n = 90] y tejidos adyacentes [n = 40]) y líneas celulares. RESULTADOS: Los datos mostraron una sobreexpresión de BIK en los carcinomas de tipo ductal invasivo (grados I, IIA y IIB) y lobular (grados IIA y IIB) con respecto a sus tejidos adyacentes respectivos. En contraste, el carcinoma canalicular (grados I y IIB) y los tumores filoides mostraron una baja expresión de BIK en relación con sus tejidos adyacentes respectivos. El análisis de la qPCR mostró una menor expresión de BIK en las células MCF-10A y MCF-7 en comparación con las células MDA-MB-231 y HMEC. En concordancia con esto, la expresión proteica de BIK fue mayor en las células MDA-MB 231 que en las células MCF-7. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestros resultados mostraron una asociación entre la expresión de BIK y el subtipo tumoral en estudio, lo cual sugiere una función diferencial de BIK en el cáncer de mama.

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: assessment of proliferative activity using automated Ki-67 immunostaining.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is almost always classified as Nottingham histological grade 2. Despite this, prognosis is markedly varied, with some ILCs behaving more akin to grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods to separate these aggressive ILCs are needed. Digital image analysis (DIA) of the Ki-67 biomarker has potential in this regard; thus, we sought to determine the feasibility of its use for automated evaluation of ILC. An initial pilot study demonstrated no ILC specific changes were required to our Ki-67 DIA algorithm for reproducible results. Subsequently, 42 consecutive cases of ILC were evaluated by visual mitosis counting in H&E stained sections and by DIA on Ki-67 stained sections. Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) DIA showed significant correlation with visual mitosis counting on H&E stained sections (rs=0.63; p<0.05), significant strong correlation (rs=0.78; p<0.05) and substantial agreement (κ=0.62) with manual/visual Ki-67 assessment and significant positive associations with grade, nodal status and 'pleomorphic' ILC subtype, and a wide stratification of values in classical/grade 2 ILC. In conclusion, DIA of Ki-67 PI in ILC is feasible, correlates with mitotic index, manual/visual Ki-67 PI and clinico-pathological variables. The broad stratification of Ki-67 PI in classical/grade 2 ILC supports its practicability as a biomarker with prognostic and predictive potential, although large studies with outcome data are required for validation.

Lobular neoplasia and invasive lobular breast cancer: Inter-observer agreement for histological grading and subclassification.

Lobular neoplasia (LN), invasive lobular breast cancer (ILBC) and related pleomorphic variants represent a distinct group of neoplastic mammary gland lesions. This study assessed the inter-observer agreement of histological grading in a series of ILBC and LN. 54 cases (36x ILBC, 18x LN) were evaluated by 17 observers. 3978 classification calls on various histological features, including nuclear grade, proliferative activity (Ki67 immunohistochemistry, categorical scoring), histological grade and pleomorphism were obtained. Pairwise Cohen's kappa values were calculated and compared between various features and different observer subsets with variable histomorphological experience. In ILBC, pairwise inter-observer agreement for histological grade ranged from poor to almost perfect concordance and was higher in advanced and experienced histopathologists compared with beginners (P < 0.001). Agreement for proliferation (Ki67) ranged from slight to almost perfect concordance and was also higher in advanced and experienced histopathologists (P < 0.001). Considering different features, agreement for proliferation (Ki67) was superior to agreement for histological grade and nuclear grade, even among advanced and experienced histopathologists (P < 0.001). In LN, agreement for B-classification ranged from poor to almost perfect concordance and was higher in advanced and experienced histopathologists (P < 0.001). Considering different features, agreement for proliferation (Ki67 in LN) was superior to subclassification agreement based on conventional features, such as acinar distention and nuclear grade (P < 0.001). In summary, pairwise inter-observer concordance of histological grading of ILBC and LN is dependent on histomorphological experience. Assessment of proliferation by Ki67 immunohistochemistry is associated with favorable inter-observer agreement and can improve histological grading of ILBC as well as LN.

Clinicopathological Features of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Epigenetic Subtypes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous collection of breast tumors with numerous differences including morphological characteristics, genetic makeup, immune-cell infiltration, and response to systemic therapy. DNA methylation profiling is a robust tool to accurately identify disease-specific subtypes. We aimed to generate an epigenetic subclassification of TNBC tumors (epitypes) with utility for clinical decision-making. METHODS: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles from TNBC patients generated in the Cancer Genome Atlas project were used to build machine learning-based epigenetic classifiers. Clinical and demographic variables, as well as gene expression and gene mutation data from the same cohort, were integrated to further refine the TNBC epitypes. RESULTS: This analysis indicated the existence of four TNBC epitypes, named as Epi-CL-A, Epi-CL-B, Epi-CL-C, and Epi-CL-D. Patients with Epi-CL-B tumors showed significantly shorter disease-free survival and overall survival [log rank; P = 0.01; hazard ratio (HR) 3.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-11.63 and P = 0.003; HR 5.29, 95% CI 1.55-18.18, respectively]. Significant gene expression and mutation differences among the TNBC epitypes suggested alternative pathway activation that could be used as ancillary therapeutic targets. These epigenetic subtypes showed complementarity with the recently described TNBC transcriptomic subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: TNBC epigenetic subtypes exhibit significant clinical and molecular differences. The links between genetic make-up, gene expression programs, and epigenetic subtypes open new avenues in the development of laboratory tests to more efficiently stratify TNBC patients, helping optimize tailored treatment approaches.

Increased RNA Expression of von Willebrand Factor Gene Is Associated With Infiltrating Lobular Breast Cancer and Normal PAM50 Subtype.

BACKGROUND: Infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histologicaI subtype of breast cancer, accounting for 10% of all cases. ILC has a characteristic genomic profile. ILC shows a high frequency of cadherin 1 (CDH1) mutations, along with loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), activation of alpha serine/threonine kinase (AKT), and mutations in T-box transcription factor (TBX3) and forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1). We suspected that another gene, von Willebrand factor (VWF), might also be part of the profile, since coagulation tests reveal significant differences in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For newly-diagnosed breast cancer, the association between VWF and histology in the GDC Breast Cancer dataset in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was evaluated. The following were used to access and analyze the data: Genomic Data Commons Data Portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/); Xena browser (https://xenabrowser.net); cBioportal (http://cbioportal.org); Oncomine (https://oncomine.org); and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 (PAM50). RESULTS: Patients with ILC had higher VWF RNA expression than patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and other histology. The difference of expression was present to the same degree in both pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients. Nine alterations in VWF and PTEN were significantly co-occurrent. Considering all histologies in 843 samples, Tukey's honest significant difference post hoc test showed that VWF RNA expression of the normal subtype was significantly greater than that of the other subtypes (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our finding of significantly higher VWF RNA expression in the PAM50 normal (non-basal-like) breast cancer subtype suggests that VWF protein measurement might complement or corroborate PAM50 results. VWF and PAM50 results both suggesting a low risk of recurrence might make the decision whether to give chemotherapy easier, especially if VWF protein were an independent predictor.

A high-risk luminal A dominant breast cancer subtype with increased mobility.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and although advances in molecular subtyping have been achieved in recent years, most subtyping strategies target individual genes independent of one another and primarily concentrate on proliferative markers. The contributions of biological processes and immune patterns have been neglected in breast cancer subtype stratification. METHODS: We performed a gene set variation analysis to simplify the information on biological processes using hallmark terms and to decompose immune cell data using the immune cell gene terms on 985 breast invasive ductal/lobular carcinoma RNAseq samples in the TCGA database. RESULTS: The samples were gathered into three clusters following implementation of the t-SNE and DBSCAN algorithms and were categorized as 'hallmark-tsne' subtypes. Here, we identified a high-risk luminal A dominant breast cancer subtype (C3) that displayed increased motility, cancer stem cell-like features, a higher expression of hormone/luminal-related genes, a lower expression of proliferation-related genes and immune dysfunction. With regard to immune dysfunction, we observed that the motility-increased C3 subtype exhibited high granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) expression accompanied by neutrophil aggregation. Cancer cells that produce high levels of G-CSF can stimulate neutrophils to form neutrophil extracellular traps, which promote cancer cell migration. This finding sheds light on one potential explanation for why the C3 subtype correlates with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The hallmark-tsne subtypes confirmed again that even the luminal A subtype is heterogeneous and can be further subdivided. The biological processes and immune heterogeneity of breast cancer must be understood to facilitate the improvement of clinical treatments.

Apocrine lesions of the breast: part 1 of a two-part review: benign, atypical and in situ apocrine proliferations of the breast.

Apocrine morphology is a common phenomenon encountered in everyday breast pathology practice, and is defined as cuboidal or columnar cells exhibiting abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm, prominent apical granules, a low nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, and round nuclei with pale chromatin and prominent nucleoli. Apocrine morphology is recognised in benign, atypical and malignant lesions of the breast. The morphology of apocrine atypia and non-high-grade apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is less well defined due to the relative rarity of these lesions. In part 1 of this two-part review, we focus on the morphological characteristics of benign, atypical and in situ apocrine lesions of the breast, summarise the available data to date regarding distinction of atypical apocrine proliferations from non-high-grade apocrine DCIS and the biological significance of apocrine atypia, and provide practical guidance on handling these difficult lesions. Part 2 of this review will focus on the concept of pure apocrine carcinoma with emphasis on its definition and molecular data, including the current understanding of the molecular apocrine signature in breast carcinoma. We complete the review with a synopsis on the utility of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of apocrine lesions of the breast.

Independent prognostic impact of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 15-3 levels for early breast cancer subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis for operable breast cancers is reportedly worse if serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) levels are above normal, the usefulness of this prognosis is limited due to the low sensitivity and specificity; in addition, the optimal cutoff levels remain unknown. METHODS: A total of 1076 patients who were operated for breast cancers (test set = 608, validation set = 468) without evidence of metastasis were recruited, and their baseline and postoperative serum CEA and CA15-3 levels were analyzed. The optimal cutoff values of CEA and CA15-3 for disease-free survival (DFS) were 3.2 ng/mL and 13.3 U/mL, respectively, based on receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve analyses. RESULTS: The DFS of patients with high CEA levels (CEA-high: n = 191, 5-year DFS 70.6%) was significantly worse (p < 0.0001) than that of CEA-low patients (n = 885, 5-year DFS 87.2%). There was a significant difference in DFS (p < 0.0001) between CA15-3-high and CA15-3-low patients (n = 314 and n = 762, respectively; 5-year DFS 71.8 vs. 89.3%). Significant associations between DFS and CA15-3 levels were observed irrespective of the subtypes. Multivariable analysis indicated that tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor grade, and CEA (p = 0.0474) and CA15-3 (p < 0.0001) levels were independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.520, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.005-2.245 for CEA; HR 2.088, 95% CI 1.457-2.901 for CA15-3). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CEA and CA15-3 levels might be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with operable early breast cancer irrespective of the subtype. Serum levels at baseline may reflect tumor characteristics for metastatic potential even when these levels are within the normal ranges.

Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis.

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Surrogate classification of intrinsic subtypes of invasive carcinomas by combined immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 (4-IHC) has increased steadily since the 2011 St Gallen symposium, due to its rapid subtyping of tumors at a reasonable cost. An important step in improving 4-IHC reproducibility and reliability will be to provide reference values from the routine use of standardized 4-IHC followed by image analysis. The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes. Five hundred twenty-one tumors were analyzed by standardized immunohistochemistry, with automatic image analysis, and HER2 FISH technique. Positivity for ER was found in 82.7% and for PR in 70.1% of cases. Using the Allred scoring system, hormone receptor results showed a bimodal distribution, particularly for ER. HER2 positivity was found in 15.7% of cases, and the mean Ki67 score was 32.3%. Using the most recently proposed surrogate definitions for the classification of luminal breast cancer subtypes, the percentages of different subtypes that we found were similar to those published with genomic platforms: 40.7% luminal A-like, 32.4% luminal B-like/HER2-negative, 9.8% luminal B-like/HER2-positive, 6.0% HER2-positive, and 11.1% triple negative. Standardized 4-IHC with automatic image analysis constitutes a low-cost method for surrogate definitions of biological subtypes of breast cancer that delivers accurate results in a day.

Clinicopathologic predictors of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients according to molecular subtype.

PURPOSE: We present a large institutional study to determine factors predictive of axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis in breast cancer according to molecular subtype. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained breast cancer database study using data from of women managed from January 2009 through December 2013. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with lymph node status and outcome according to breast cancer molecular subtyping. RESULTS: LN metastases were detected in 464 (32.1%) of 1444 women with breast cancer. By multivariate analysis, independent factors predictive of LN involvement were: for the luminal A subtype (n=776): tumour size: OR=1.05 [95% CI: 1.03-1.07] P<0.0001; lymphovascular invasion: OR=3.06 [95% CI: 1.80-5.20] P<0.0001 and tumour grade: OR=1.65 [95% CI: 1.07-2.58] P=0.026. For luminal B subtype (n=441): age: OR=0.97 [95% CI: 0.95-0.99] P=0.004; tumour size: OR=1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05] P=0.002; lymphovascular invasion: OR=3.21 [95% CI: 1.92-5.44] P<0.0001; inflammatory breast cancer: OR=12.36 [95% CI: 2.18-243.3] P=0.019. For the HER2 subtype (n=72): lymphovascular invasion: OR=7.87 [95% CI: 2.10-35.2] P=0.003. For the triple negative subtype (n=155): parity: OR=1.53 [95% CI: 1.10-2.25] P=0.02; tumour size: OR=1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.05] P=0.002 and lymphovascular invasion: OR=7.13 [95% CI: 2.46-22.8] P=0.00048. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study provides valuable insight into LN involvement of patients with primary breast cancer according to molecular subtyping.

Molecular Classification of Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.

The morphology of breast tumors is complicated and diagnosis can be difficult. We present here a novel diagnostic model which we validate on both array-based and RNA sequencing platforms which reliably distinguishes this tumor type across multiple cohorts. We also examine how this molecular classification predicts sensitivity to common chemotherapeutics in cell-line based assays. A total of 1845 invasive breast cancer cases in six cohorts were collected, split into discovery and validation cohorts, and a classifier was created and compared to pathological diagnosis, grade and survival. In the validation cohorts the concordance of predicted diagnosis with a pathological diagnosis was 92%, and 97% when inconclusively classified cases were excluded. Tumor-derived cell lines were classified with the model as having predominantly ductal or lobular-like molecular physiologies, and sensitivity of these lines to relevant compounds was analyzed. A diagnostic tool can be created that reliably distinguishes lobular from ductal carcinoma and allows the classification of cell lines on the basis of molecular profiles associated with these tumor types. This tool may assist in improved diagnosis and aid in explorations of the response of lobular type breast tumor models to different compounds.

Goserelin plus tamoxifen compared to chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with early stage-, lymph node-negative breast cancer of luminal A subtype.

OBJECTIVES: To study the outcomes of adjuvant goserelin combined with tamoxifen (GosTam) compared to chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen (ChemTam) in premenopausal patients with early stage, luminal A breast cancer. METHODS: From 2008 until 2013, data were retrospectively collected for premenopausal patients who underwent surgery for invasive tumors that were ≤2.0 cm, node-negative, strongly positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER-2-negative, and Ki-67 < 25%. The patients were divided into two groups according to adjuvant regimen, either GosTam or ChemTam. All patients who underwent different adjuvant regimens were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 235 patients underwent GosTam and 171 patients underwent ChemTam. There were significantly more patients younger than 40 years in the GosTam group (32% GosTam vs. 22% ChemTam, p = 0.031). Mean tumor size was significantly smaller (1.19 cm vs. 1.48 cm, p < 0.001), Ki-67 significantly lower (p = 0.049), and nuclear grade was low in a significant number of patients in the GosTam group (2% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 51.3 months, there was no mortality in either group. There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups even after univariate analysis considering age, tumor size, nuclear grade, and P53% (GosTam = 98.9% vs. ChemTam = 95.7%, HR = 0.404, 95% CI = [0.073, 2.222], p = 0.248). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between treatment groups, and neither chemotherapy nor ovarian suppression seemed to improve the outcome. Thus, tamoxifen alone might be a sufficient option for this low-risk patient population.

Breast cancer classification and prognostication through diverse systems along with recent emerging findings in this respect; the dawn of new perspectives in the clinical applications.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and the second leading cause of mortality due to cancer worldwide. The complexity of breast cancer resembles an intricate ecosystem comprising various cleverly designed interaction levels of internal and external factors to generate a pliable context in the clonal evolution of breast cancer cells. Principally, the complex entity can become evident toward delineating a number of significant variations in the specific fields of breast cancer analyses, including the molecular, physiological, and morphological characteristics, clinical presentations, risk factors, the histopathological conditions, and response to systemic therapy regarding the maintenance of tumor as a whole. In hindsight, various classification systems developing based on specific inclusion criteria have indisputably changed both our appreciation of the biological demeanor of breast cancer and the main strategies for designing tailored therapy regimens through the proper evaluation of diagnosis and prognostication of given specimens. Here, we endeavor to provide a general overview of different types of breast cancer classification as well as the clinical acceptance of their applications along with the latest findings in this area. Taken together, the major significance of breast cancer management that can be ascertained by operational convergent points of its stratification areas is owing to the fact that the achievement of individualized and targeted therapy may denounce new horizons of surveillance and treatment strategies in which they may function as a rheostat of specific therapy regimens toward reducing the detected distances between experimental data and operating options in clinical practice.

Accuracy of classification of invasive lobular carcinoma on needle core biopsy of the breast.

Although the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that in patients with biopsy-proven invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), preoperative MRI scan is considered, the accuracy of diagnosis of ILC in core biopsy of the breast has not been previously investigated. Eleven pathology laboratories from the UK and Ireland submitted data on 1112 cases interpreted as showing features of ILC, or mixed ILC and IDC/no special type (NST)/other tumour type, on needle core biopsy through retrieval of histology reports. Of the total 1112 cases, 844 were shown to be pure ILC on surgical excision, 154 were mixed ILC plus another type (invariably ductal/NST) and 113 were shown to be ductal/NST. Of those lesions categorised as pure ILC on core, 93% had an element of ILC correctly identified in the core biopsy sample and could be considered concordant. Of cores diagnosed as mixed ILC plus another type on core, complete agreement between core and excision was 46%, with 27% cases of pure ILC, whilst 26% non-concordant. These data indicate that there is not a large excess of expensive MRIs being performed as a result of miscategorisation histologically.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between luminal invasive ductal carcinoma and luminal invasive lobular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The pathological and clinical features of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) differ from those of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Several studies have indicated that patients with ILC have a better prognosis than those with ductal carcinoma. However, no previous study has considered the molecular subtypes and histological subtypes of ILC. We compared prognosis between IDC and classical, luminal type ILC and developed prognostic factors for early breast cancer patients with classical luminal ILC. METHODS: Four thousand one hundred ten breast cancer patients were treated at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital from 2003 to 2012. We identified 1,661 cases with luminal IDC and 105 cases with luminal classical ILC. We examined baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of luminal ILC. RESULTS: The prognosis of luminal ILC was significantly worse than that of luminal IDC. The rates of 5-year disease free survival (DFS) were 91.9% and 88.4% for patients with luminal IDC and luminal ILC, respectively (P = 0.008). The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) were 97.6% and 93.1% for patients with luminal IDC and luminal ILC respectively (P = 0.030). Although we analyzed prognosis according to stratification by tumor size, luminal ILC tended to have worse DFS than luminal IDC in the large tumor group. In addition, although our analysis was performed according to matching lymph node status, luminal ILC had a significantly worse DFS and OS than luminal IDC in node-positive patients. Survival curves showed that the prognosis for ILC became worse than IDC over time. Multivariate analysis showed that ILC was an important factor related to higher risk of recurrence of luminal type breast cancer, even when tumor size, lymph node status and histological grade were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Luminal ILC had worse outcomes than luminal IDC. Consequently, different treatment approaches should be used for luminal ILC than for luminal IDC.

The prognostic value of age for invasive lobular breast cancer depending on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor-defined subtypes: A NCDB analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the effect of age on survival according to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)-defined lobular breast cancer subtype in a wide age range. METHODS: 43,230 invasive lobular breast cancer women without comorbidities diagnosed between 2004 and 2011 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were analyzed. The effects of age on overall survival (OS) among different age groups were evaluated by log-rank test and Cox proportional model. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that patients diagnosed at both young (< 35 years) and old (≥ 70 years) ages had worse prognosis compared with those in the middle ages. We further analyzed the interaction between age and molecular subtype for predicting OS: in ER+PR+ subtype, the HR of OS declined with age from 1.55 (95% CI, 1.08-2.22; P = 0.019) in the group younger than 35 years to 1.38 (1.02-1.86; P = 0.036) in the 35-39 group, but increased with age to 10.1 (8.49-11.94; P < 0.001) in the group older than 79. While in ER+PR- and ER-PR- subtypes, the HRs showed no statistical differences among women diagnosed before 60 (P > 0.1); and in ER-PR+ subgroup, the HRs were similar in patients younger than 70 (P > 0.1); thus, the plots of HRs in these three subtypes remained steady until the age of 60 or 70. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified that the effect of age on OS in lobular breast cancer varied with ER/PR-defined subtypes. Personalized treatment strategies should be developed to improve outcomes of breast cancer patients with different ages and ER/PR statuses.

Intraductal papillomas on core biopsy can be upgraded to malignancy on subsequent excisional biopsy regardless of the presence of atypical features.

Intraductal papillary lesions of the breast constitute a heterogeneous entity, including benign intraductal papilloma (IDP) with or without atypia and malignant papillary carcinoma. Differentiating between these diagnoses can be challenging. We re-evaluated core biopsy specimens that were diagnosed as IDP and the corresponding surgical excision specimens, and assessed the potential risk for the diagnosis to be modified to malignancy based on excision. By sorting the pathology database of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, we identified 146 core biopsy cases that were histologically diagnosed as IDP between 1997 and 2013. The re-evaluated diagnosis was IDP without atypia in 79 (54%) patients, IDP with atypia in 66 (45%), and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 1 (1%). Among the 34 patients (23%) who underwent surgical excision subsequent to core biopsy, histological diagnosis was upgraded to carcinoma, excluding lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), in 14 (41%) cases, including 4 (33%) of 12 IDPs without atypia and 10 (45%) of 22 IDPs with atypia. Complete surgical excision should be kept in mind for all IDPs diagnosed on core biopsy, not only IDPs with atypia but IDPs without atypia, especially when clinical or imaging diagnosis findings cannot rule out the possibility of malignancy, because papillary lesions comprise a variety of morphological appearances.

Role of second-look ultrasound examinations for MR-detected lesions in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical value of second-look ultrasound (US) examination for the evaluation of additional enhancing lesions detected on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2008 and February 2011, 794 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer underwent breast MR imaging. We included 101 patients with 132 additional enhancing breast lesions detected on MR imaging who underwent second-look US.  The imaging features and lesion category according to the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) were assessed with MR and US imaging, respectively. RESULTS: According to the BI-RADS system, 67 lesions (50.8 %) were classified as category 0, 33 lesions (25.0 %) as category 3, and 32 lesions (24.2 %) as category 4. Of the 67 indeterminate lesions on MR imaging, 34 (50.7 %) were demonstrated on second-look US. 11 of these 34 lesions showed suspicious sonographic features, including 1 lesion that showed malignancy (9.1 %, 1/11). Most of the suspicious lesions on MR imaging (26 of 32 BI-RADS category 4 lesions, 81.3 %) were demonstrated on second-look US, and 17 were malignant (65.4 %, 17/26). Of the 6 BI-RADS category 4 lesions without sonographic correlation, 1 was malignant (16.7 %, 1/6). CONCLUSION: Second-look US examination was useful for evaluating MR-detected lesions in patients with breast cancer.