Survival and prognosis of lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Only a few large-scale studies have focused on large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, a rare type of pulmonary malignancy, and uniform diagnostic criteria and standardized treatments are lacking. This study aimed to assess the treatment outcomes and factors influencing patients' prognosis with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. METHODS: The data of 55 patients with pathologically confirmed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, treated at our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018, were collected. Relationships between clinical characteristics, diagnoses, treatment outcomes, and prognoses were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median of 18.5 (0.5-41.0) months. Thirty-four patients died before the final follow-up, resulting in a median overall survival of 17.9 (0.5-36.0) months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 69.1%, 23.6%, and 1.8%, respectively. Single-factor analysis identified gender (P=0.036), smoking history (P=0.008), obstructive atelectasis (P=0.032), regional lymph node metastasis (P=0.020), and treatment selection (P=0.000) as factors influencing overall survival. Multifactor analysis identified treatment selection as an independent survival prognostic factor. Particularly, significant differences were observed between the combination therapies (surgery+chemotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy+chemotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy) and single-therapy approaches (chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone; P<0.001), but not among the combination therapies (P=0.216). DISCUSSION: Male patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a history of smoking, obstructive atelectasis, and regional lymph node metastasis have a particularly poor prognosis. Our observation of the treatment approach as an independent survival prognostic factor suggests that combination therapies may yield survival benefits to patients.

Urinary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 22 Cases.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the urinary tract is a rare disease. We present a relatively large retrospective cohort of urinary LCNEC, 20 from the urinary bladder, and 2 from the ureter, from a single institution. The patients included 16 men and 6 women with a median age of 74.5 years. Most LCNEC presented at an advanced stage with tumors invading the muscularis propria and beyond (21/22). Eight cases were pure LCNEC, while 14 cases were mixed with other histologic types, including conventional urothelial carcinoma (n=9), carcinoma in situ (n=7), small cell carcinoma (n=6), and urothelial carcinoma with glandular (n=3) features. Most LCNEC expressed neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin (22/22), chromogranin (13/16), CD56 (7/7), TTF1 (8/8), and INSM1 (2/3). They were negative for common urothelial markers including HMWCK (0/3), p40/p63 (0/6), CK20 (0/10), and had variable GATA3 staining (4/8). Ki-67 stained 25% to nearly 100% tumor cell nuclei. Patient survival was associated with cancer stage, and pure LCNEC showed worse survival than mixed LCNEC. Compared with small cell carcinoma at similar stages from a prior study, LCNEC had a worse prognosis only when patients developed metastatic disease. For organ-confined LCNEC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical resection is the treatment option to achieve long-term survival.

[Correlation Analysis of Serum LDH Concentration before and after Operation and Prognosis of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer Patients].

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration can lead to poor prognosis in patients with small cell lung cancer and lung adenocarcinoma, but its relationship with the prognosis of patients with lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L-LCNEC) is not clear. This study aims to explore the influence of L-LCNEC preoperative serum LDH concentration and postoperative LDH concentration change trend on the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients after surgery, so as to judge the clinical prognosis of L-LCNEC provides new ideas. METHODS: Collected the clinical data. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value, while the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard model were used to analyze data. RESULTS: DFS was shortened in patients with high serum LDH concentration before operation and increased LDH concentration after operation (P<0.001, P<0.001). The preoperative LDH concentration and postoperative LDH concentration change trend were independent prognostic factors for patients (P<0.001, P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative LDH concentration and its postoperative concentration change trend in patients with L-LCNEC are independent prognostic factors for DFS of patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programed Death-1 Blockade in Previously Treated Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare tumor with an aggressive clinical course. However, there is limited knowledge of its treatment strategy. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-programed death-1 (PD-1) blockade monotherapy in previously treated advanced LCNEC. METHODS: Eleven patients with previously treated advanced LCNEC who received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy between January 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Of a total of 11 patients (median [range] age, 66 [37-79] years; 8 men [73%] and 3 women [27%]), 8 patients had performance status (PS) 0-1 [73%] and 3 patients had PS 2 [27%]; 9 patients received 1 prior chemotherapy [82%] and 2 patients received 2 prior chemotherapies [18%]. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 months. Although PD-1 blockade was administered at median cycles of 3 (range, 1-12), overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 9.1%, 2.7 months, and 4.6 months, respectively. Any adverse events were observed in 9 patients (82%), including 1 patient with grade 3 pneumonitis as a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 blockade monotherapy as a subsequent line for previously treated advanced LCNEC exhibited usefulness and tolerability and was identified as a valid treatment option.

Disparate outcomes in nonsmall cell lung cancer by immigration status.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) outcomes by race, stratified by country of origin in patients diagnosed with NSCLC in California. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. Race/ethnicity was defined as White (W), Black (B), Hispanic (H), and Asian (A) and stratified by country of origin (US vs. non-US [NUS]) creating the following patient cohorts: W-US, W-NUS, B-US, B-NUS, H-US, H-NUS, A-US, and A-NUS. Three multivariate models were created: model 1 adjusted for age, gender, stage, year of diagnosis and histology; model 2 included model 1 plus treatment modalities; and model 3 included model 2 with the addition of socioeconomic status, marital status, and insurance. RESULTS: A total of 68,232 patients were included. Median OS from highest to lowest were: A-NUS (15 months), W-NUS (14 months), A-US (13 months), B-NUS (13 months), H-US (11 months), W-US (11 months), H-NUS (10 months), and B-US (10 months) (p < 0.001). In model 1, B-US had worse OS, whereas A-US, W-NUS, B-NUS, H-NUS, and A-NUS had better OS when compared to W-US. In model 2 after adjusting for receipt of treatment, there was no difference in OS for B-US when compared to W-US. After adjusting for all variables (model 3), all race/ethnicity profiles had better OS when compared to W-US; B-NUS patients had similar OS to W-US. CONCLUSION: Foreign-born patients with NSCLC have decreased risk of mortality when compared to native-born patients in California after accounting for treatments received and socioeconomic differences.

Role of Immunotherapy in Stage IV Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung.

BACKGROUND: Despite approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers, the role of immunotherapy in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) in lung is undefined. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), Stage IV lung LCNEC cases diagnosed from 2014 to 2016 were analyzed. Information regarding cancer treatment was limited to first course of therapy, including surgery for primary lesion, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among 661 eligible cases, 37 patients were treated with immunotherapy. No significant association between use of immunotherapy and clinical demographics was observed except for use of chemotherapy (p=0.0008). Chemotherapy was administered in 34 (92%) and 406 (65%) in immunotherapy and non-immunotherapy groups, respectively. Use of immunotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (Log-rank p=0.0018). Landmark analysis in the immunotherapy group showed 12 and 18-month survivals of 34.0% and 29.1%, respectively, whereas those in the non-immunotherapy group were 24.1% and 15.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that female sex (HR=0.79, p=0.0063), liver metastases (HR=0.75, p=.0392), surgery (HR= 0.50, p <0.0001) use of chemotherapy (HR= 0.44, p <0.0001), and use of immunotherapy (HR=0.64, p=0.0164) had statistical significance. Propensity score matching in overall survival analysis showed a nonsignificant trend (p=0.0733) in favor of immunotherapy treatment. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study using NCDB suggests that use of immunotherapy may improve survival of LCNEC patients.

Real-world survival outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors in large-cell neuroendocrine tumors of lung.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (aLCNEC). METHODS: 125 consecutive patients with aLCNEC were identified in the electronic databases of 4 participating cancer centers. The patients were divided into group A (patients who received ICI, n=41) and group B (patients who did not receive ICI, n=84). Overall survival since advanced disease diagnosis (OS DX) and OS since ICI initiation (OS ICI) were captured. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 11.8 months (mo) (IQR 7.5-17.9) and 6.0mo (IQR 3.1-10.9), 66% and 76% of patients died in groups A and B, respectively. Median OS DX was 12.4mo (95% CI 10.7 to 23.4) and 6.0mo (95% CI 4.7 to 9.4) in groups A and B, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.02). For ICI administration, HR for OS DX was 0.59 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.93, p=0.02-unadjusted), and 0.58 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.98, p=0.04-adjusted for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), presence of liver metastases and chemotherapy administration). In a propensity score matching analysis (n=74; 37 patients in each group matched for age and ECOG PS), median OS DX was 12.5 mo (95% CI 10.6 to 25.2) and 8.4 mo (95% CI 5.4 to 16.9) in matched groups A and B, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.046). OS ICI for patients receiving ICI as monotherapy (n=36) was 11.0 mo (95% CI 6.1 to 19.4). CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of retrospective design and small sample size, the results of this real-world cohort analysis suggest a positive impact of ICI on OS in aLCNEC.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium: A very rare gynecologic malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, outcome, and treatment of the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the endometrium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic and survival data of 10 patients who underwent surgery for NEC. The patients were collected between 1999 and 2017 from four referral centers in Turkey. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 67 years (range: 34-75 years). The NEC of endometrium consist of 9 cases with small cell carcinoma (SC) NEC (two with mixed histotypes), and one with a large cell (LC) NEC. According to FIGO 2009 criteria, 70 % (7/10) of patients had advanced stage (III and IV) disease. All patients except one underwent surgical staging, eight patients received platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) and of 6 those were additionally treated with radiotherapy (RT). Four patients died of disease ranging from 2 to 10 months and six were alive 12-72 months with no evidence of disease. In addition, 4 SC NEC cases raised in polypoid features had no evidence of disease from 24 to 72 months. DISCUSSION: NEC of the endometrium is a rare disease with poor prognosis, which frequently diagnosed in advanced stages. The main treatment modality was the administration of platinum-based CTX as an adjuvant to surgery or surgery and RT. Our result suggests that the polypoid feature of the tumor might be one of the best predictors for the prognosis of SC NEC.

Ki-67 Index of 55% Distinguishes Two Groups of Bronchopulmonary Pure and Composite Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Distinct Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available concerning prognostic factors for bronchopulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (BP-LCNECs) and even less is known about combined LCNECs (Co-LCNECs). We investigated whether an integrated morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular approach could be used for their prognostic evaluation. METHODS: Morphological (including combined features), proliferative (mitotic count/Ki-67 index), immunohistochemical (napsin A, p40, TTF-1, CD44, OTP, SSTR2A, SSTR5, mASH1, p53, RB1, and MDM2), and genomic (TP53, RB1, ATM, JAK2, KRAS, and STK11) findings were analyzed in BP-LCNECs from 5 Italian centers, and correlated with overall survival (OS). The Ki-67 index was expressed as the percentage of positive cells in hot spots as indicated in the WHO 2019 Digestive System Tumors and, for Co-LCNECs, the Ki-67 index was evaluated only in the LCNEC component. RESULTS: A total of 111 LCNECs were distinguished into 70 pure LCNECs, 35 Co-LCNECs (27 with adenocarcinoma [ADC] and 8 with squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC]), and 6 LCNECs with only napsin A immunoreactivity. The Ki-67 index cutoff at 55% evaluated in the neuroendocrine component was the most powerful predictor of OS (log-rank p = 0.0001) in all LCNECs; 34 cases had a Ki-67 index <55% (LCNEC-A) and 77 had a Ki-67 index ≥55% (LCNEC-B). Statistically significant differences in OS (log-rank p = 0.0001) were also observed between pure and Co-LCNECs. A significant difference in OS was found between pure LCNECs-A and Co-LCNECs-A (p < 0.05) but not between pure LCNECs-B and Co-LCNECs-B. Co-LCNEC-ADC and LCNEC napsin A+ cases had longer OS than pure LCNEC and Co-LCNEC-SqCC cases (log-rank p = 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, tumor location, pure versus combined features, and napsin A, but no single gene mutation, were significantly associated with OS after adjustment for Ki-67 index and study center (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Ki-67 proliferation index and the morphological characterization of combined features in LCNECs seem to be important tools for predicting clinical outcome in BP-LCNECs.

Metformin use and lung cancer survival: a population-based study in Norway.

BACKGROUND: We assessed associations between metformin use and survival in a nationwide Norwegian cohort of lung cancer (LC) patients. METHODS: The study linked 22,324 LC patients from the Cancer Registry of Norway diagnosed 2005-2014 with the Norwegian Prescription Database. We estimated associations of pre- and post-diagnostic metformin use with overall survival (OS) and LC-specific survival (LCSS) using multivariable time-fixed and time-dependent Cox regression. RESULTS: Pre-diagnostic metformin use was not associated with improved survival in all patients. Nevertheless, pre-diagnostic metformin use was associated with better LCSS in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.99) and in patients with regional stage SCC (HR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.47-0.95). Post-diagnostic metformin use was associated with improved LCSS in all patients (HR = 0.83; 95%CI 0.73-0.95), in patients with SCC (HR = 0.75; 95%CI 0.57-0.98), regional stage LC (HR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.59-0.94), and regional stage SCC (HR = 0.57; 95%CI 0.38-0.86). OS showed similar results. Analyses of cumulative use showed a dose-response relationship in all patients, patients with adenocarcinoma and SCC, and with regional and metastatic LC. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use was associated with improved survival, especially LCSS in patients with regional stage SCC. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of metformin in LC treatment.

Prognostic impacts of extracranial metastasis on non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: A retrospective study based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

This study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of the number and sites of extracranial metastasis (ECM) in NSCLC patients with BM. NSCLC patients with BM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 were enrolled in analysis. Patients from 2010 to 2013 were included in the training set and those from 2014 to 2015 in the validation set. ECM sites among different subtypes of NSCLC were compared by Chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were performed to analyze survival data. Competing-risks analysis was used to predict cumulative incidence rates for CSS and non-CSS cause. We included 5974 patients in the training cohort and 3561 patients in the validation cohort. Most (nearly 80%) NSCLC patients with BM showed 0-1 involved extracranial organ, with the most and least common ECM organ being bone and distant lymph nodes (DLNs) among all subtypes of NSCLC, respectively. The number of involved extracranial organs was an independent prognostic factor for patients with BM from NSCLC (p < 0.001). Patients with 0-1 ECM had better survival than those with larger number of involved extracranial organs (p < 0.001). Cumulative incidence rates for CSS were increased with the number of ECM raising (p < 0.001). All involved extracranial organs were associated with worse survival (p < 0.05). In patients with single-organ ECM, we observed a better prognosis in lung and bone metastasis, while liver metastasis showed worst survival. But the difference in survival in these patient groups was relatively small. Patients with liver metastasis had higher cumulative incidence rates for CSS than that in patients with lung and bone metastasis (p < 0.05). More extracranial metastases were associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients with BM and ECM sites showed limited effect on survival. Tailored treatments would be reasonable for BM patients from NSCLC with different metastasis patterns.

PLEK2 Gene Upregulation Might Independently Predict Shorter Progression-Free Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore PLEK2 expression profile, its prognostic value, and the potential genomic alterations associated with its dysregulation in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and Kaplan-Meier plotter were used in combination for bioinformatic analysis. RESULTS: PLEK2 mRNA was significantly upregulated in both LUAD and LUSC compared with their respective normal controls. PLEK2 upregulation showed independent prognostic value in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.169, 95%CI: 1.033 -1.322, p = 0.014). PLEK2 mRNA expression was positively correlated with invasion, cell cycle, DNA damage, and DNA repair of LUAD cells at the single-cell level. Genomic analysis showed that gene-level amplification might not directly lead to increased PLEK2 expression. Methylation profile analysis found 4 CpG sites (cg12199376, cg14437634, cg17641252, and cg06724236) had at least a weakly negative correlation with PLEK2 expression, among which cg12199376, cg14437634 and cg17641252 locate around the first exon of the gene. CONCLUSIONS: Increased PLEK2 expression might be a specific prognostic biomarker of poor PFS in LUAD patients. Its expression had significant positive correlations with invasion, cell cycle, DNA damage, and DNA repair of LUAD cells at the single-cell level. Promoter hypomethylation might be a potential mechanism leading to its upregulation.

Urinary Tract Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Issues.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the urinary tract is a high-grade neuroendocrine tumor with distinct pathological features, usually portending an aggressive clinical behavior in comparison to conventional urothelial carcinoma. Due to its low prevalence, little is known about its clinical management and there is no current standard of care. The aim of this review was to summarize the current knowledge about LCNEC of the bladder, ureter and kidney, with relevance to diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic issues, through a systematic analysis of clinical, pathological and outcome data retrieved from the literature.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC).

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term survivals and related prognostic indicators of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC), and determine the prognostic value of post-operative radiotherapy in PLCNEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PLCNEC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in our study. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the factors related to overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching analysis (PSM analysis) was used to balance the variables differences between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and non-PORT groups. RESULTS: A total of 701 postoperative cases were identified, with the median follow-up time of 23 months. The 3- and 5-year OS were 50.7%, and 41.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that stage I (P<0.001), age <65 years old (P<0.001), chemotherapy (P<0.001) were independent favorable prognostic factors. There is no significant difference in survival between patients with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after PSM analysis (P=0.489). No survival benefit in favor of PORT were displayed, even when subgroups were deeply analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Age, stage, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS of patients with resected PLCNEC. However, PORT after resection did not improve long-term outcome of PLCNEC patients.

Efficacy of immune check-point inhibitors (ICPi) in large cell neuroendocrine tumors of lung (LCNEC).

OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the ICPi efficacy in LCNEC. We explored the efficacy and safety of ICPi in LCNEC and assessed its impact on OS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with advanced LCNEC were selected from the Davidoff Cancer Center database. These were divided into groups A1 (patients treated with ICPi, n-23) and A2 (patients not treated with ICPi, n-14). Additionally, group A1* was introduced (patients treated with ICPi as a monotherapy, n-21). Another cohort of advanced non-LCNEC lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab at five Israeli cancer centers was chosen as a comparator (group B, n-270). ORR, PFS with ICPi in group A1* were assessed (RECIST 1.1), OS with ICPi was compared between groups A1* and B. OS since advanced disease diagnosis (OSDx) was compared between groups A1 and A2. RESULTS: In group A1*, ORR and median PFS with ICPi were 33 %, and 4.2 months (95 % CI, 2.4-8.1), respectively. With median follow-up since start of ICPi of 6.2 months [IQR 2.2-12.1] and 4.9 months [IQR 2.3-8.9] in groups A1* and B, respectively, 52 % and 64 % of patients died in groups A1* and B, respectively. Median OS with ICPi comprised 11.8 months (95 % CI, 3.7-NR) and 6.9 months (95 % CI, 5.5-8.1) in groups A1* and B, respectively (p-0.23). Median OSDx was 14.5 months (95 % CI, 10.1-38.9) and 10.3 months (95 % CI, 2.6-NR), in groups A1 and A2, respectively (p-0.54). CONCLUSION: In advanced LCNEC, ICPi outcomes are comparable to the outcomes observed in advanced NSCLC. Future research is needed to clarify the impact of ICPi on OS, and to correlate its benefit with tumor mutational landscape.

Five-year survival and prognostic factors according to histology in 6101 non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate five-year survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients according to histology and to identify independent prognostic factors by histology. METHODS: Data were obtained during the KBP-2010-CPHG study, which included all new cases of primary lung cancer diagnosed in 2010 in 104 non-academic hospitals. RESULTS: In all, 3199 patients had adenocarcinoma (ADC), 1852 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 754 large cell carcinoma (LCC). Five-year survival was 13.3% [12.1%-14.5%] for ADC, 14.3% [12.7%-16.0%] for SCC, 9.6% [7.6%-11.9%] for LCC (P<0.001). Performance status, weight loss prior to diagnosis and tumour stage were consistently significant independent prognostic factors. Age (>70 years; P=0.004), male gender (P<0.001), and smoking (P<0.001) were independent negative prognostic factors for ADC. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutation tests, performed in 1638 ADC patients, were positive for 186. Five-year survival was 14.7% [10.3%-21%] and 10.9% [9.4%-12.6%] for mutated and wild-type EGFR, respectively (P<0.001). EFGR mutation was an independent positive prognostic factor (HR=0.5 [0.4-0.6], P<0.001); however, the proportional hazards assumption was not fulfilled and hazards were inverted after 35 months. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year survival in patients managed in French non-academic hospitals for primary NSCLC in 2010 remained poor (<15%), whatever the histologic type. The independent negative prognostic factors for five-year survival were: weight, particularly weight loss prior to diagnosis; smoking (active or former) at diagnosis in ADC and LCC and smoking level at diagnosis in smoker patients with SCC. The independent positive prognostic factors were young age and female gender for ADC.

Does progress achieved in the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer reach the elderly population? A cohort study from a cancer centre from Eastern Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been evolving. The goal of our study was to evaluate whether novel therapeutics are used in the elderly population and improve outcomes to a similar extent as in young patients. METHODS: We enrolled patients registered in the Cancer Registry of Eastern Switzerland and grouped them into four cohorts: Elderly patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed 2005-2007 and 2015-2016 (elderly cohorts 1,2) were compared to cohorts of patients < 70 years diagnosed during the same time periods (young cohorts 1,2). RESULTS: 499 individuals were analysed. Median cancer-specific survival in the elderly cohorts 1 and 2 was 3.9 months and 6.3 months, respectively, and 8.0 and 12.7 months in the young cohorts 1 and 2. 12-month survival significantly improved over ten years only in younger patients (35.6% and 54.9%), however not in the elderly cohorts (20% vs. 35%). Proportion of patients receiving any line of systemic treatment remained lower in the elderly cohorts (53% vs. 78%). CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in median cancer-specific survival in both cohorts, a significant and clinically meaningful improvement of 12-month cancer-specific survival was only seen in young patients. The adoption of novel treatment approaches is lagging behind in the elderly population.

Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung malignancies. There are limited data on the epidemiology and best treatment practices for this malignancy. This study aimed to be the largest cohort with the most up-to-date analysis of the epidemiology of LCNEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify cases of LCNEC diagnosed from 2010 through 2015, reflecting years the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging system was in use. Using these data, we compared the epidemiology, demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival times of LCNEC with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC). Trends in incidence and mortality were recorded from 2004 to 2015. RESULTS: A total of 195,148 cases of lung cancer, including 1681 (0.9%) cases of LCNEC, were analyzed. LCNEC was more common among male subjects, and disease usually presented at stage IV (55%). Brain metastasis occurred more frequently in LCNEC (19.2%) than SCLC (16.7%, P < .001) or NSCLC (13%, P < .001). Incidence increased by 0.011 people per 100,000 per year, primarily of stage IV disease. Annual mortality from LCNEC doubled over the time period studied. Survival in patients with stage I-III LCNEC mirrored survival trends of patients with NSCLC, whereas stage IV LCNEC behaved similarly to SCLC. CONCLUSION: LCNEC generally presents at more advanced stages than NSCLC but earlier than SCLC. Stage I-III LCNEC behaves similarly to NSCLC, whereas stage IV is more akin to SCLC. LCNEC incidence is increasing. Despite this, it remains poorly studied and did not demonstrate an improved prognosis in our cohort.

Real world utilization of EGFR TKIs and prognostic factors for survival in NSCLC during 2010-2016 in Sweden: A nationwide observational study.

The purpose of our study was to investigate time trends in treatment pattern and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Utilizing Swedish nationwide registers, we identified all Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs and followed them from diagnosis (2010-2015) until death or end of observation (2016). Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to test associations of patient-, tumor-related factors with OS. Of 9,992 Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients, the 1,419 (14%) who initiated EGFR TKI treatment during observation were younger (median age 68 vs. 71 years), less ≥1 comorbidities (34% vs. 46%), more often female (59% vs. 47%), Stage IV (89% vs. 85%) and adenocarcinoma (85% vs. 66%) compared to non-TKI treated patients. After TKI initiation, 7% (n = 100) of the patients switched, 4% (n = 62) rechallenged a TKI treatment, 65% (n = 919) discontinued and 24% (n = 338) had died. A more recent diagnosis demonstrated shorter time to EGFR TKI initiation, prolonged treatment length and longer median OS (15.3 months 2010-2011; 14.4 months 2012-2013; 18.6 months 2014-2015). Prognostic factors for longer OS when treated with EGFR TKIs were younger age, adenocarcinoma, less advanced clinical stage and less comorbid disease. In conclusion, during the observation period, survival improved for EGFR TKI treated NSCLC patients, as did the accessibility for targeted therapies for these patients.

Disparity in clinical outcomes between pure and combined pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The 2015 World Health Organization classification defines pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) as a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of pure LCNEC and combined LCNEC remain unclear. Hence, we performed a multi-center retrospective study to compare the clinical outcomes of pure versus combined LCNEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 381 patients with pulmonary LCNEC admitted to 17 Chinese institutes between 2009 and 2016 were collected retrospectively. Clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed among patients receiving adjuvant (adjuvant group; n = 56) and first-line (first-line group; n = 146) chemotherapy, as well as among patients receiving small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC) chemotherapy regimens. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify clinicopathological variables that might influence patient outcomes. RESULTS: Expression levels of neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin-A, CD56) were associated with patients' prognosis in the total study cohort. In the adjuvant group, median disease-free survival was non-significantly longer for SCLC-based regimens than for NSCLC-based regimens (P = 0.112). In the first-line group, median progression-free survival was significantly longer for SCLC-based regimens than for NSCLC-based regimens (11.5 vs. 7.2 months, P = 0.003). Among patients with combined LCNEC, adenocarcinoma was the most common combined component, accounting for 70.0 % of cases. Additionally, median overall survival was non-significantly shorter for combined LCNEC than for pure LCNEC (P = 0.083). CONCLUSION: The SCLC regimen is a more effective choice, as either first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy, when compared to the NSCLC regimen for LCNEC treatment. Further studies are needed to clarify the survival differences between patients with pure-, and combined LCNEC.