Assessment of the Safety of Exposure to Cefcapene Pivoxil during the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study in Japan.

Cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride is an antibiotic often used by women who are or may be pregnant. However, the safety of exposure to it during the first trimester of pregnancy has not been assessed. In this study, we aimed to clarify the effects of exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. Data were obtained from pregnant women who were counseled on drug use during pregnancy at two Japanese facilities from April 1988 to December 2017. The incidence of major malformations in singleton pregnancy was compared between neonates born to women who took cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride (n = 270) and control drugs (n = 1594) during their first trimester. The adjusted odds ratio of the incidence of major malformations was calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for smoking during pregnancy and maternal age. The incidence of major malformations was 2.6% in the cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride group and 1.8% in the control group. There were no significant differences in the incidence between the cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride and control groups (adjusted odds ratio: 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.64-3.42], p = 0.36). This prospective cohort study showed that exposure to cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride during the first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of major malformations in infants. Our findings will help healthcare providers in choosing appropriate medicines.

Ceftaroline for Central Nervous System Infections: Case Report of a Young Infant, and Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Managing health care acquired and device-associated intracranial infections in young children can be challenging given adverse antibiotic side effects and difficulties in achieving adequate central nervous system (CNS) antibiotic concentrations. Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin with a favorable safety profile and activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and several Gram-negative organisms. Published data on the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections in children and adults are limited. METHODS: We describe a 2-month-old infant with ventriculo-subgaleal shunt-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis ventriculitis, which was successfully treated with ceftaroline, in addition to vancomycin and rifampin. We conducted a scoping review of English-language literature retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science that assessed the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections. RESULTS: We identified 22 articles for inclusion in our review, which described 92 unique patients, of whom 2 were <21 years old. Ceftaroline was commonly used in conjunction with other antibiotics to treat infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus , coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Most case reports described clinical success with ceftaroline, though small case series and cohort studies yielded mixed efficacy assessments. Adverse effects attributed to ceftaroline were rare and included reversible myelosuppression, eosinophilia, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies suggested similar CNS penetration through inflamed meninges as other beta lactam antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a growing body of published evidence supporting the use of ceftaroline in combination with other agents for the treatment of CNS infections. In absence of clinical trials, additional real-world data are needed to define the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline for children and adults with CNS infections.

Bacterial Isolates and Characteristics of Children With Febrile Neutropenia on Treatment for Cancer at a Tertiary Hospital in Western Kenya.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics of children with febrile neutropenia, the associated bacterial organisms, and their sensitivity patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) pediatric oncology ward, from June 2021 to April 2022. A total of 110 children who developed fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy were enrolled. Blood samples for culture were collected aseptically. Patient characteristics were presented in frequency tables. Antimicrobial sensitivity patterns were plotted in tables against the bacterial isolates cultured. Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used to determine any association between patient characteristics, bacterial growth, and antimicrobial sensitivity. RESULTS: The majority (n = 66; 60%) were males. The median age was 6.3 years (standard deviation, 3.7). The majority of patients 71 (64.5%) had hematologic malignancies, the most common being AML. There was a significant association between severity of neutropenia and hematologic malignancies (P = .028). In total, 31/110 (28.2%) blood cultures were positive for bacterial growth. Gram-positive bacteria were more frequent (n = 20; 58.1%). The most common organism was Escherichia coli (n = 6; 18.2%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5; 15.2%). All the isolates were sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin and also showed good sensitivity toward meropenem (n = 10/11; 90.9%). High resistance to cephalosporins was noted with ceftriaxone (n = 5/6; 83.3%), cefepime (n = 4/7; 57.1%), and ceftazidime (n = 3/4; 75%). CONCLUSION: The most common malignancy associated with febrile neutropenia was AML. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common isolates. There was high resistance to cephalosporins.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome: a case report of possible cephalosporin-induced cutaneous adverse reaction.

A severe medical condition known as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is marked by a cutaneous and mucosal reaction from the use of specific medications. The prodromal illness is followed by severe mucocutaneous symptoms in this immune-mediated disease. We describe the clinical history of a 55-year-old Caucasian woman who was exposed to cephalosporins. In resource-constrained countries and hospitals where cutaneous biopsy is not readily available, it is not easy to diagnose Steven Johnson Syndrome. This is particularly true in countries where the incidence of infectious diseases such as scarlet fever and measles is high and the early symptoms of SJS can be mistaken for these conditions. We used the Naronjo scale to confirm the probable association of the drug with the syndrome. Physicians while writing prescriptions for their patients need to warn them of potential side effects and they should keep in mind conditions like Stevens-Johnson syndrome. This case report highlights the need for improved knowledge and understanding of SJS among healthcare practitioners in resource-limited communities where the prevalence of infectious diseases is high.

Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy.

BACKGROUND: Cephalosporins are the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections. Most studies give a rate of combined IgE and non-IgE penicillin allergy yet it is recommended that cephalosporins be avoided in patients having the former but can be used in those with the latter. Some studies use penicillin allergy while others penicillin family allergy rates. The primary goal of this study was to determine the rates of IgE and non-IgE allergy as well as cross reactions to both penicillin and the penicillin family. Secondary goals were to determine the surgical services giving preoperative cefazolin and the types of self reported reactions that patients' had to penicillin prompting their allergy status. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery at a University Health Sciences Centre were retrospectively studied. The hospital electronic medical record was used for data collection. RESULTS: 8.9% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 0.9% with cefazolin. 4.0% of our patients reported IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. 10.5% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 0.8% with cefazolin. 4.3% of our patients reported IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of combined IgE and non-IgE reactions for both penicillin and penicillin family allergy was within the range reported in the literature. Our rate of cross reactivity between cefazolin and combined IgE and non-IgE allergy both to penicillin and the penicillin family were lower than reported in the old literature but within the range of the newer literature. We found a lower rate of allergic reaction to a cephalosporin than reported in the literature. We documented a wide range of IgE and non-IgE reactions. We also demonstrated that cefazolin is frequently the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections by many surgical services and that de-labelling patients with penicillin allergy is unnecessary.

Cefepime-induced Neurotoxicity: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a South-Indian Tertiary Healthcare Facility.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum coverage and anti-pseudomonal activity. The safety profile of cefepime was relatively favourable until neurotoxicity was first reported in 1999. Despite cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN), it continues to be a principal part of parenteral treatment for various infections. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for CIN compared to other antibiotics. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 738 patients over eight months in Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, India. Patients with cefepime were selected as study cohort (SC; n= 496), and other antibiotics were included in the reference cohort (RC; n=242). RESULTS: The results showed that 53 (10.7%) patients developed neurotoxicity in the SC, whereas 12 (5%) patients in the RC. A significant association was found between neurotoxicity and cefepime use (X2 =6.641; p=0.01). SC has a 2.29 times increased risk of neurotoxicity than RC (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.2-4.38). Risk estimation showed that renal failure patients had a 5.5 times higher risk for CIN than non-renal failure patients (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.98 - 10.17). CIN symptoms were disorientation (38.5%), loss of consciousness (23.1%), drowsiness (18.5%), etc. The calculated number needed to harm (NNH) for cefepime was 17.2. CONCLUSION: The study found a higher incidence of CIN compared to other antibiotics-induced neurotoxicity and a harmful association between cefepime use and CIN development. Besides, renal failure is a risk factor for CIN. Therefore, the study warrants the use of cefepime, where no other alternatives are available.

Beta-lactam hypersensitivity diagnosis in ambulatory and hospitalized settings require different approaches.

BACKGROUND: Data on beta-lactam hypersensitivity (BLH) are mainly focused on immediate or mild nonimmediate reactions in the ambulatory setting, but limited in patients with concurrent illness and moderate-to-severe nonimmediate reactions in the hospitalized setting. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the entire spectrum of BLH in Thai tertiary hospital. METHODS: Clinical characteristics of 357 patients with suspected BLH were evaluated in a 7-year period. Culprit drug identification was performed in 335 patients by combined skin testing, in vitro testing, or drug provocation tests. RESULTS: The predominant BLH presentations were non-immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated reactions with severe cutaneous adverse reactions of 18.9%, and BLH status was definitively confirmed in 18.1%. The most common verified culprits were cephalosporins (34.8%), particularly in hypersensitivity type IV reactions. Natural penicillins were the main implicated drugs in 48.5% of ambulatory patients. In contrast, cephalosporins and carbapenems were the main implicated drugs in hospitalized patients. Non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and serum sickness-like reaction remained diagnostically challenged. New generations of beta-lactams, hospitalized patients, recent allergic history, and underlying malignancies or autoimmune diseases were associated with increased BLH risk. CONCLUSION: At present, cephalosporins are the leading causes of BLH, particularly in non-IgE-mediated reactions. More research on the verification of non-IgE hypersensitivity reactions from new generations of beta-lactams should be better emphasized. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registry was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01667055; https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT01667055).

Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) has been well acknowledged among clinicians, although there are no clear diagnostic criteria or specific laboratory testing to help with its diagnosis. We aimed to summarize the existing evidence regarding CIN and provide future agendas for research. METHODS: Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for all peer-reviewed articles using keywords including 'cefepime', 'neurotoxicity', 'encephalopathy' and 'seizure', from their inception to 20 January 2022. RESULTS: We included 92 articles, including 23 observational studies and 69 cases from case reports and case series, in the systematic review. Among 119 patients with CIN, 23.5% were in the ICU at the time of diagnosis and nearly 90% of the cases showed renal dysfunction.Cefepime overdoses were described in 41%. The median latency period of developing CIN from cefepime initiation was 4 days, and about 12% developed CIN during empirical treatment. CIN patients commonly manifested altered mental status (93%), myoclonus (37%) and non-convulsive seizure epilepticus (28%). A serum cefepime trough level of >20 mg/L would put patients at risk for CIN. CIN-related symptoms were ameliorated in 97.5% by dose reduction or discontinuation of cefepime, with median time to improvement of 3 days. No CIN-associated deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review summarizes the current evidence and characteristics of CIN. In the current situation where there are no CIN diagnostic criteria and the drug monitoring platform is not routinely available, candidates for cefepime should be carefully selected. Also, based on these findings, it needs to be appropriately dosed to avoid the development of CIN.

Retrospective Cohort Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefozopran for Treating Febrile Neutropenia during Chemotherapy in Patients with Lung Cancer.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious side effect in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy and frequently proves fatal. Since infection control is crucial in the management of FN, the antimicrobial agent cefozopran (CZOP) has been recommended but not approved for routine use in clinical care of FN in Japan. However, few studies of CZOP in the management of FN have used a thrice daily dose schedule. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of CZOP at a dose of 1 g three times daily to those of cefepime (CFPM) in the treatment of FN in our lung cancer patients. The response rates of the CZOP and CFPM groups were 89.5% (17/19 cases) and 83.0% (39/47 cases), respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. The median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 6 days (4-10 days) in the CZOP group and 7 days (3-13 days) in the CFPM group, with no significant difference between groups. The incidence rates of adverse events were 21.1% (4/19 cases) in the CZOP group and 19.1% (9/47 cases) in the CFPM group. No adverse events of Grade 3 or higher were observed in either group. The findings of the present study suggest that CZOP administration at a dose of 1 g three times per day as an antimicrobial treatment alternative against FN.

Adherence and outcomes of a surgical prophylaxis guideline promoting cephalosporin use among patients with penicillin allergy.

BACKGROUND: The study purpose was to assess adherence to a local surgical prophylaxis guideline in patients with reported penicillin allergies, which recommends cephalosporins as first-line prophylaxis. METHODS: Adult patients with penicillin allergies admitted for a surgical procedure from July 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively screened, and the first surgery per admission was included. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeries using ß-lactam prophylaxis. Additional outcomes included prophylaxis timing, hypersensitivity reactions, acute kidney injury, infectious complications, duration of stay, and 30-day mortality or readmission. RESULTS: Among 597 procedures, 504 patients (84.4%) received a ß-lactam for surgical prophylaxis, including 494 (82.3%) who received a cephalosporin. Patients in the non-ß-lactam group were more likely to have a type I IgE-mediated penicillin allergy (48.4% vs 31.7%, P = .002); however, the majority with type I reactions still received ß-lactams (78.0%), including in the setting of anaphylaxis or angioedema to penicillin (67.7%). Zero allergic reactions to prophylaxis antibiotics were reported in either group, and there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients receiving drugs associated with the management of allergic reactions. Receipt of non-ß-lactams was associated with inappropriate prophylaxis timing (9.7% vs 3.2%, P = .005) and postprocedural acute kidney injury (7.5% vs 0.6%, P < .001). All other outcomes were nonsignificant between the groups. CONCLUSION: Among surgical patients with a documented penicillin allergy, most received cephalosporin prophylaxis as recommended by institutional guidelines, with zero allergic reactions. Receipt of non-ß-lactam prophylaxis was associated with worsened outcomes. Cephalosporin prophylaxis should be preferred for surgical patients, including in the setting of true penicillin allergy.

The Effect of Beta-lactam Allergy Status on the Rate of Surgical Site Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients with reported BL allergies have increased odds of developing SSI compared to reported NBL allergic patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI represent a significant risk of morbidity and mortality for patients. Cefazolin-based perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is the guideline-recommended drug-of-choice for most procedures. Due to over-reporting of BL allergies, many patients may not receive guideline-directed cephalosporin-based prophylaxis, which may result in an increased SSI rate. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort design study was performed. Data was collected on all targeted surgical procedures: cesarean section, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy, colon, laminectomy, and spinal fusion surgeries. RESULTS: During the study period, 2676 procedures were analyzed with 454 (17%) and 2222 (83%) in reported BL and NBL allergic cohorts, respectively. Significantly more SSI developed in the BL cohort versus NBL cohort (3.1% vs 1.5%, odds ratio 2.015; 95% confidence interval, 1.090-3.724; P = 0.023). Through a multivariate logistic regression, receipt of a NBL antibiotic regimen was the only variable to have a significant effect on SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio, 3.815; 95% confidence interval, 1.142-12.749; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Reported BL allergic patients have an increased odds of developing SSI in comparison to NBL allergic patients. The increased risk is likely related to administration of NBL antibiotic regimens in comparison to BL-based regimens. Thorough antibiotic allergy history collection can be a valuable SSI prevention tool to safely increase the proportion of patients receiving BL regimen.

Impact of Treatment Regimens on Antibody Response to the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is widely spread and remains a global pandemic. Limited evidence on the systematic evaluation of the impact of treatment regimens on antibody responses exists. Our study aimed to analyze the role of antibody response on prognosis and determine factors influencing the IgG antibodies' seroconversion. A total of 1,111 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms admitted to Leishenshan Hospital in Wuhan were retrospectively analyzed. A serologic SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibody test was performed on all the patients 21 days after the onset of symptoms. Patient clinical characteristics were compared. In the study, 42 patients progressed to critical illness, with 6 mortalities reported while 1,069 patients reported mild to moderate disease. Advanced age (P = 0.028), gasping (P < 0.001), dyspnea (P = 0.024), and IgG negativity (P = 0.006) were associated with progression to critical illness. The mortality rate in critically ill patients with IgG antibody was 6.45% (95% CI 1.12-22.84%) and 36.36% (95% CI 12.36-68.38%) in patients with no IgG antibody (P = 0.003). Symptomatic patients were more likely to develop IgG antibody responses than asymptomatic patients. Using univariable analysis, fever (P < 0.001), gasping (P = 0.048), cancer (P < 0.001), cephalosporin (P = 0.015), and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (P = 0.021) were associated with IgG response. In the multivariable analysis, fever, cancer, cephalosporins, and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine correlated independently with IgG response. We determined that the absence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody IgG in the convalescent stage had a specific predictive role in critical illness progression. Importantly, risk factors affecting seropositivity were identified, and the effect of antimalarial drugs on antibody response was determined.

Enabling antibiotic allergy evaluations and reintroduction of first-line antibiotics for patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) often have a history of antibiotic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that pose a barrier to receiving recommended first-line treatment. Targeted antibiotic allergy evaluations are increasingly recognized as an important strategy for optimization of antimicrobial stewardship. OBJECTIVE: To improve first-line antibiotic use in patients with CF with antibiotic ADRs by streamlining access to antibiotic allergy evaluations and standardizing documentation of plans for antibiotic reintroduction. METHODS: We incorporated allergy evaluations into a multidisciplinary CF clinic and used telemedicine when allergy evaluations could not be performed during CF clinic. Standard documentation of antibiotic allergy plans was used to enable safe reintroduction of first-line antibiotics by CF providers. RESULTS: Strategies used in this study allowed 81.3% (26 of 32) of patients with CF to receive allergy evaluations and antibiotic allergy plans for prioritized antibiotics (penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfonamide), with removal of 41.0% (16 of 39) of prioritized antibiotic ADRs. Only 5.1% (2 of 39) of prioritized antibiotic ADRs evaluated required strict avoidance after evaluation. There were 9 patients who received at least 1 prioritized antibiotic, with 66.6% (6 of 9) of these patients given the antibiotic after only 1 allergy evaluation visit. Furthermore, these strategies allowed allergy evaluations of 23 nonprioritized antibiotics to occur, with removal of the ADR in 39.1% (9 of 23) and use of 77.8% (7 of 9) of nonprioritized antibiotics after removal. CONCLUSION: Incorporating allergy evaluations into a multidisciplinary CF clinic can liberalize first-line antibiotic use in patients with CF. Standard documentation of antibiotic allergy plans allowed antibiotic reintroduction to occur even before complete removal of documented antibiotic ADRs.

Vancomycin prophylaxis for revision hip arthroplasty in penicillin and cephalosporin sensitive patients: Is dose adjustment necessary in accordance with blood loss and fluid replacement?

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the changes in the serum concentration of prophylactically administrated vancomycin in the perioperative period of revision hip arthroplasty in penicillin/cephalosporin-allergic patients, (2) to assess whether the postoperative re-administration of vancomycin is needed, and (3) to determine the relationships of vancomycin serum concentration with blood loss, body weight, and fluid replacement in such patients. METHODS: This study consisted of 29 patients (20 females, 9 males; mean age=63.3 years; age range=45-79 years) with a history of penicillin/cephalosporin allergy undergoing revision hip arthroplasty secondary to aseptic loosening or periprosthetic fractures. Serum vancomycin levels were measured (1) before administration of vancomycin, (2) at the time of skin incision, (3) every 1,5 hours thereafter until the end of the operation, (4) during the skin closure, and (5) after three and 12 hours from the initial dosage. Data regarding body weight, amounts of intraoperative blood loss, fluid and blood replacements and postoperative wound drainage were recorded. RESULTS: The average blood loss, fluid replacement, and drain volume were 1280.3±575.8 (500-2700) mL, 2922.6±768.8 (1700-4600) mL, and 480.2±163.7 (200-850) mL, respectively. The mean levels of serum vancomycin were 46.3±21.8 (14.1-80.7) mg/L at the time of skin incision, 17.9±4.7 (9.4-30.9) and 9.8±2.2 (4.3-13.8) mg/L after 1.5 and 3 hours from the beginning of the surgery and 5.1±1.1 (2.9-6.8)mg/L after 12th hour postoperatively. The measured vancomycin levels were below the effective serum concentrations (< 5 mg/L) for 18 patients at 12 hours the administration of the first dose. A moderate level negative correlation between the blood loss/body weight ratio and vancomycin levels was found (p=0.004, r=-0.493). Predictive ROC curve analysis resulted in determining a blood loss volume higher than 1150 ml and a blood loss/body weight ratio higher than 18,5 is significant to estimate the vancomycin level below the minimum effective serum level at 12th hour postoperatively (AUC=0.793±0.16, p=0.009, AUC=0.753) 26±0.12, p=0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION: Evidence from this study has indicated vancomycin concentration at 12th hour is below the effective level in most patients. Thus, earlier repetitive infusion of vancomycin seems to be necessary in penicillin/cephalosporin-allergic patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, especially in those with high blood loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

[Antibiotic stewardship - recent developments]. / Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Bereich Antibiotic Stewardship.

Both in hospitals and outpatient settings, fewer fluoroquinolones have been prescribed in Germany in recent years. The consumption of cephalosporins also decreased somewhat in favor of penicillin derivatives. The aminoglycosides, which have only rarely been prescribed, can now be used again as a suitable alternative - but only parenterally - due to their relatively favorable activity and low resistance rates among typical urinary tract infection pathogens. In acute severe infection such as sepsis, addition, e. g. of tobramycin, to a suitable betalactam of a single dose has been discussed as a useful option, but the evidence for such a recommendation is weak. There is little news about the rational use of antibiotics in hematology-oncology patients. In the case of fever and neutropenia, the initial empirical regimens of choice remain piperacillin-tazobactam or a pseudomonas-active carbapenem as monotherapy. These betalactams should be given with extended infusion times, e. g. over 4 hours. Linezolid should be considered as a reserve drug and not be used empirically, but only in targeted therapy. With regard to an alleged penicillin allergy, the risk of true allergic reactions can be differentiated by careful taking of the history; on that ground patient subgroups can be defined that may be re-exposed without further allergological examinations.

Choledochal cyst as an important risk factor for pediatric gallstones in low-incidence populations: A single-center review.

BACKGROUND: Gallstones are uncommon in infants and children and Asian children are thought to have very low risk. Diagnoses have increased in recent years with the widespread use of ultrasonography (USG). This study aimed to review our experience with risk factors, complications, and treatment of pediatric gallstones in low-incidence populations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients younger than 18 years old diagnosed with gallstones using USG between November 2006 and December 2012 in a tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan. Demographic information including age and sex, follow-up period, USG findings, predisposing factors, complications, treatment approaches and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-eight children with gallstones diagnosed with USG were enrolled and reviewed in our study. Females comprised 55% of patients, with no specific gender tendency. No risk factor could be identified in 30.8% of patients. The most common risk factors were cephalosporin (CS) use, presence of a choledochal cyst (CC), and spherocytosis. CS use was not associated with a higher dissolution rate. The presence of type IVa CC implied a high rate of gallstone recurrence after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Complications were seen in 22.4% of patients, but only two needed emergency stone removal. Expectant management was performed in 61% of patients and 62.5% of them achieved spontaneous resolution; the stone dissolution rate was not lower than in the group treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Stone size was significantly decreased after UDCA use if resolution did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric gallstones showed high resolution rate, and the clinical course was largely benign. CS use was the most common risk factor and did not predict a higher dissolution rate. Type IVa CC was also an important risk factor associated with a high recurrence rate. Conservative treatment and oral UDCA may be reasonable strategies in most patients, unless complications are present.

Real-life experience with ceftobiprole in a tertiary-care hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftobiprole is a new therapeutic option for bacterial pneumonia, with activity against most antimicrobial-resistant Gram-positive cocci, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Data on the use of ceftobiprole in real life are limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in a context of a hospital practice. METHODS: In a single-centre, observational, retrospective clinical study, we collected data of 29 patients undergoing ceftobiprole therapy, with a focus on clinical outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: There was a high burden of comorbidities in the study cohort, including kidney dysfunction (38%) and cancer (24%), and a high proportion of patients with sepsis/septic shock (72%), a central line (41%) or on mechanical ventilation (21%). Most infections were nosocomial (24, 82.8%). Ceftobiprole was mostly prescribed for pneumonia (17 patients, 58.6%), and bloodstream infections (10 patients, 34.5%), both empirically (9 cases, 31%) and as targeted therapy (20, 69%, with staphylococci as the dominant pathogens). It was the first-line drug in 15 cases (51.7%). Overall, a favourable clinical outcome was observed in the majority of cases (68.9%), with clinical cure in 3 (10.3%) and clinical improvement in 17 (58.6%). Failure of treatment occurred in seven cases (24.1%). Three patients experienced a definite ceftobiprole-related adverse event, with two cases of myoclonus. No major adverse effect on bone marrow, kidney or liver function was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole, even outside current indications, may be a safe and effective treatment for resistant Gram-positive cocci infections where other drugs are inactive or poorly tolerated, and for salvage therapy.

Incidence of cystoid macular oedema with intracameral cephalosporin or vancomycin in cataract surgery.

Purpose: To compare the incidence of pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema (CME) in patients who receive intracameral cephalosporin versus intracameral vancomycin during cataract surgery.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on subjects with the diagnosis of CME between January 1 2010 and July 31 2017. Inclusion criterion was the documentation of CME after cataract extraction. Exclusion criteria were intraoperative complication, prior history of macular oedema, epiretinal membrane, uveitis, other pre-existing retinal pathology, or other post-operative pathology including other ocular surgery in the post-operative period.Results: The final analysis included 89 eyes with optical coherence tomography (OCT) proven CME. The incidence of pseudophakic CME in our population of 10,165 cataract surgeries after applying the above-stated exclusion criteria was 0.88%. The incidence of pseudophakic CME in subjects who received intracameral cephalosporin was 0.87% (mean age in years 69 ± 11; 31 male [39%], 48 female [61%]). The incidence of pseudophakic CME in subjects who received intracameral vancomycin was 0.96% (mean age in years 66 ± 13; 4 male [40%], 6 female [60%]). Pearson's chi-square test demonstrated no significant difference between these groups (p = 0.7705).Conclusions: There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pseudophakic CME in subjects who received intracameral cephalosporin versus intracameral vancomycin during cataract surgery.