Tourniquet Use and Local Tissue Concentrations of Cefazolin During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Prophylactic administration of antibiotics before skin incision is an important component in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection in arthroplasty surgery. For antibiotics to be effective, the local tissue concentration (LTC) must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration of typical infecting organisms; however, the LTC of cefazolin during arthroplasty is poorly understood. Objective: To compare the systemic concentration of cefazolin in serum with the LTC in fat, synovium, and bone during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while assessing the effect of tourniquet inflation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, in patients undergoing TKA at a single academic center. Intervention: Total knee arthroplasty with or without a limb tourniquet. Main Outcomes and Measures: Systemic blood and local tissues from the surgical site (fat, synovium, and bone) were harvested at regular intervals during the surgery. The primary outcome was the LTC of cefazolin, quantified using the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. Results: A total of 59 patients were included in the study, with 29 in the tourniquet group (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [9.6] years; 23 [79.3%] female) and 30 in the no tourniquet group (mean [SD] age, 69.9 [9.7] years; 21 [70.0%] female). In patients undergoing TKA without a tourniquet, the mean concentration of cefazolin in serum was 71.9 µg/mL (95% CI, 66.4-77.5 µg/mL), whereas the mean LTCs were 13.9 µg/g (95% CI, 12.1-15.7 µg/g) in fat, 27.7 µg/g (95% CI, 24.3-31.0 µg/g) in synovium, and 17.7 µg/g (95% CI, 14.8-20.5 µg/g) in bone. For patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet, the mean concentration of cefazolin in serum was 72.0 µg/mL (95% CI, 66.3-77.7 µg/mL), and the mean LTCs were 9.9 µg/g (95% CI, 8.7-11.1 µg/g) in fat, 21.8 µg/g (95% CI, 18.7-25.0 µg/g) in synovium, and 13.0 µg/g (95% CI, 10.8-15.2 µg/g) in bone. The use of a tourniquet resulted in significantly lower mean LTCs by 60 minutes after cefazolin infusion (10.8 µg/g [95% CI, 9.1-12.4 µg/g] vs 16.9 µg/g [95% CI, 14.1-19.6 µg/g], P = .001 in fat; 18.9 µg/g [95% CI, 14.1-23.6 µg/g] vs 25.8 µg/g [95% CI, 21.4-30.3 µg/g], P = .03 in synovium; and 11.8 µg/g [95% CI, 9.3-14.2 µg/g] vs 19.4 µg/g [95% CI, 14.5-24.4 µg/g], P = .007 in bone). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the concentration of cefazolin was lower in local tissues (fat, synovium, and bone) than in systemic blood, and the use of a limb tourniquet further significantly reduced these concentrations. Although the current prophylactic dosing regimen for cefazolin provides sufficient serum concentrations, the levels in the periarticular tissue during TKA may be insufficient to prevent periprosthetic joint infection. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05604157.

Effect of Blood Product Resuscitation on Cefazolin Pharmacokinetics in Trauma Patients.

Background: Antibiotics are frequently administered prophylactically to trauma patients with various injury patterns to prevent infectious complications. Trauma patients may also require large volume resuscitation with blood products. Limited data are available to support antibiotic dosing recommendations in this population. We hypothesized that we would be able to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin, a frequently used antibiotic in the trauma scenario, from remnant blood samples by pharmacokinetic analysis of trauma patients. Methods: Remnant plasma from standard of care chemistry/hematology assessments was retrieved within 48 h of collection and assayed to determine cefazolin concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted in Pmetrics using R. Linear regression was conducted to assess the effect of blood product resuscitation volume on cefazolin pharmacokinetic parameters. Results: Cefazolin concentrations best fitted a two-compartment model (Akaike information criterion: 443.9). The mean ± standard deviation parameters were total body clearance (4.3 ± 1.9L), volume of the central compartment (Vc: 7.7 ± 6.9L), and intercompartment transfer constants (k12: 1.3 ± 0.98 h-1, k21: 0.6 ± 0.45 h-1). No statistical relationships were observed between blood products, volume of blood products, and cefazolin clearance or Vc (R2: 0.0004-0.21, p = 0.08-0.95). Using a 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation, 2 g with repeated dosing every 2 h until end of surgery was required to achieve 93.2% probability of 100% free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC) at the ECOFF value for Staphylococcus aureus (2 mg/L). Conclusions: In these 15 trauma patients receiving blood transfusion, no relationship with blood volume resuscitation and cefazolin pharmacokinetics was observed. On the basis of this pharmacokinetic model, frequent cefazolin doses are required to maintain 100% fT > MIC.

A pharmacokinetic framework describing antibiotic adsorption to cardiopulmonary bypass devices.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can alter pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and the drug may adsorb to the CPB device, altering exposure. Cefazolin is a beta-lactam antibiotic used for antimicrobial prophylaxis during cardiac surgery supported by CPB. Adsorption of cefazolin could result in therapeutic failure. An ex vivo study was undertaken using CPB devices primed and then dosed with cefazolin and samples were obtained over 1 hour of recirculation. Twelve experimental runs were conducted using different CPB device sizes (neonate, infant, child, and adult), device coatings (Xcoating™, Rheoparin®, PH.I.S.I.O), and priming solutions. The time course of saturable binding, using Bmax (binding capacity), Kd (dissociation constant), and T2off (half-time of dissociation), described cefazolin adsorption. Bmax estimates for the device sizes were neonate 40.0 mg (95% CI 24.3, 67.4), infant 48.6 mg (95% CI 5.97, 80.2), child 77.8 mg (95% CI 54.9, 103), and adult 196 mg (95% CI 191, 199). The Xcoating™ Kd estimate was 139 mg/L (95% CI 27.0, 283) and the T2off estimate was 98.4 min (95% CI 66.8, 129). The Rheoparin® and PH.I.S.I.O coatings had similar binding parameters with Kd and T2off estimates of 0.169 mg/L (95% CI 0.01, 1.99) and 4.94 min (95% CI 0.17, 59.4). The Bmax was small (< 10%) relative to a typical total patient dose during cardiac surgery supported by CPB. A dose adjustment for cefazolin based solely on drug adsorption is not required. This framework could be extended to other PK studies involving CPB.

Plasma and tissue concentrations of 2 g prophylactic cefazolin prior to lower extremity surgery.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most clinically relevant complications and the use of prophylactic cefazolin is common practice. However, the knowledge about the pharmacological aspects of prophylactic cefazolin in the lower extremities remains limited. In this prospective cohort, a sub-study of the WIFI-2 randomized controlled trial, adults between 18 and 75 years of age who were scheduled for implant removal below the level of the knee and randomized for cefazolin, was included. A maximum of two venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue samples were taken during surgery. The primary outcomes were the cefazolin concentrations in venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue. A total of 27 patients [median (interquartile range) age, 42 (29-59) years; 17 (63%) male] with 138 samples were included in the study. A minimum of 6 weeks follow-up was available for all patients. The mean (SD) venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue concentrations were 36 (13) µg/mL, 29 (13) µg/mL, and 28 (13) µg/g, respectively, and the cefazolin concentrations between the different locations of surgery did not differ significantly in both target-site plasma and target-site tissue (P = 0.822 and P = 0.840). In conclusion, 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin demonstrates adequacy in maintaining coverage for a duration of at least 80 minutes of surgery below the level of the knee, significantly surpassing the MIC90 required to combat the most prevalent microorganisms. This study represents the first of its kind to assess cefazolin concentrations in the lower extremities by examining both plasma and tissue samples in this magnitude.

Morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize cefazolin surgical prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Cefazolin is the leading antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections worldwide. Consensus guidelines recommend adjustment of the cefazolin dose above and below 120 kg without regard to body composition. Algorithms exist to repurpose radiologic data into body composition (morphomics) and inform dosing decisions in obesity. OBJECTIVES: To compare the current standard of body weight to morphomic measurements as covariates of cefazolin pharmacokinetics and aid dose stratification of cefazolin in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: This prospective study measured cefazolin plasma, fat, and colon tissue concentrations in colorectal surgery patients in order to develop a morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to guide dose adjustments. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was also constructed to inform tissue partitioning in morbidly obese patients (n = 21, body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 with one or more co-morbid conditions). RESULTS: Morphomics and pharmacokinetic data were available in 58 patients with a median [min, max] weight and age of 95.9 [68.5, 148.8] kg and 55 [25, 79] years, respectively. The plasma-to-subcutaneous fat partition coefficient was predicted to be 0.072 and 0.060 by the PopPK and PBPK models, respectively. The estimated creatinine clearance (eCLcr ) and body depth at the third lumbar vertebra (body depth_L3) were identified as covariates of cefazolin exposure. The probability of maintaining subcutaneous fat concentrations above 2 µg/mL for 100% of a 4-h surgical period was below 90% when eCLcr ≥105 mL/min and body depth_L3 ≥ 300 mm and less sensitive to the rate of infusion between 5 and 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney function and morphomics were more informative than body weight as covariates of cefazolin target site exposure. Data from more diverse populations, consensus on target cefazolin exposure, and comparative studies are needed before a change in practice can be implemented.

Pharmacokinetics of Locally Applied Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Importance: Antibiotic irrigation of breast implants is widely used internationally, but no clinical study has investigated the pharmacokinetics of antibiotic prophylaxis in the breast implant pocket. Objectives: To evaluate how long locally applied gentamicin, cefazolin, and vancomycin concentrations in the implant pocket remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the most common bacterial infections and to measure systemic uptake. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between October 25, 2021, and September 22, 2022, among 40 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction who were part of the ongoing BREAST-AB trial (Prophylactic Treatment of Breast Implants With a Solution of Gentamicin, Vancomycin and Cefazolin Antibiotics for Women Undergoing Breast Reconstructive Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial). Patients were randomized to receive locally applied gentamicin, cefazolin, and vancomycin or placebo. Samples were obtained from the surgical breast drain and blood up to 10 days postoperatively. Exposures: The breast implant and the implant pocket were irrigated with 160 µg/mL of gentamicin, 2000 µg/mL of cefazolin, and 2000 µg/mL of vancomycin in a 200-mL saline solution. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic concentrations above the MIC breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: gentamicin, 4 µg/mL; cefazolin, 2 µg/mL; and vancomycin, 2 µg/mL. Secondary outcomes included the time above the MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other relevant bacteria, as well as systemic uptake. Results: The study included 40 patients (median age, 44.6 years [IQR, 38.3-51.4 years]; median body mass index, 23.9 [IQR, 21.7-25.9]) with a median number of 3 drain samples (range, 1-10 drain samples) and 2 blood samples (range, 0-6 blood samples). Vancomycin and cefazolin remained above the MIC for S aureus significantly longer than gentamicin (gentamicin, 0.9 days [95% CI, 0.5-1.2 days] for blood samples vs 6.9 days [95% CI, 2.9 to 10.9 days] for vancomycin [P = .02] vs 3.7 days [95% CI, 2.2-5.2 days] for cefazolin [P = .002]). The gentamicin level remained above the MIC for P aeruginosa for 1.3 days (95% CI, 1.0-1.5 days). Only cefazolin was detectable in blood samples, albeit in very low concentrations (median concentration, 0.04 µg/mL [range, 0.007-0.1 µg/mL]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that patients treated with triple-antibiotic implant irrigation during breast reconstruction receive adequate prophylaxis for S aureus and other common implant-associated, gram-positive bacteria. However, the protection against P aeruginosa may be inadequate.

Population pharmacokinetics of three alternative prophylactic antibiotics during cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation.

AIMS: The aim of this pharmacokinetic study was to describe and quantify population pharmacokinetics of three antibiotics, cefazolin, ampicillin, and ciprofloxacin, used as antibacterial prophylaxis during cardiovascular surgery with the use of extracorporeal circulation (ECC). METHODS: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with ECC were enrolled to this prospective, pharmacokinetic study. An intravenous bolus of 2 g of ampicillin, 2 g of cefazolin or 400 mg of ciprofloxacin was administered 60-30 min before surgery. Blood samples were collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 180 min after the administration and at the end of the surgery. Plasma concentrations of the antibiotics were measured using HPLC methods. Serum concentration-time profiles were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were enrolled into the study, 20 with ampicillin, 25 cefazolin and 9 ciprofloxacin. For all antibiotics, population pharmacokinetic models have been successfully developed. CONCLUSION: We identified estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as the main factor determining the achievement of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target in ampicillin or cefazolin and body weight in ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during cardiac surgery with ECC support.

The expected advantage of administering prophylactic antibiotics using target- concentration controlled infusion: Development of a new pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin.

The aim of this study was to explore the utility of target-concentration controlled infusion (TCI) as a prophylactic antibiotic administration method based on the results of a population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin. In patients undergoing elective gastric surgery, 2 g of cefazolin was dissolved in 50 mL of saline and administered for 10 min prior to skin incision. Arterial blood samples were obtained at preset intervals to measure the total and free plasma concentrations of cefazolin. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. To evaluate the effectiveness of the TCI method, stochastic simulation was performed based on the model construction results. In total, 360 total and 360 free plasma concentration measurements from 40 patients were used to characterise the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin. The changes in the total concentration of cefazolin over time were well-explained by the three-compartment mammillary model. Fat-free mass and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significant covariates. The probability of target attainment (PTA) to reach the target 100% fraction of time that the free plasma concentration of cefazolin was maintained above its minimal inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) at MIC of 4 mg/L was also notably higher in the TCI method (90.7%) than in the standard method (17.0%). When cefazolin is administered by the TCI method, patient-tailored antibiotic dosing may be possible. The potential benefits of administering prophylactic antibiotics by the TCI method were observed. Further research is warranted to confirm the effectiveness of the TCI method.

Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Patients With Obesity Undergoing Surgery Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: The authors' objective was to determine the adequacy of an institutional standard dosing practice for infection prophylaxis in open cardiac surgery in patients heavier than 120 kg undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: A prospective, single-center, open-label study was used to determine if cefazolin serum concentrations were maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout surgery. A pharmacokinetic model describing cefazolin disposition was developed for perioperative patients with morbid obesity, based on these values. Probability of target attainment was evaluated across the clinically relevant MIC spectrum. SETTING: Maine Medical Center is an academic hospital in Portland, Maine, affiliated with Tufts University School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients scheduled for cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass who weighed at least 120 kg. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 2 g of cefazolin intravenously (IV) within 1 hour before incision, an additional 1 g injected into the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit at the initiation of bypass, and 2 g administered IV every 3 hours after the initial IV dose. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cefazolin serum concentrations were collected after incision, after initiation of bypass, each hour of bypass, at the end of bypass, and at sternal closure. For patients weighing >120 kg undergoing cardiac surgery, the studied dosing regimen met or exceeded targeted cefazolin concentrations for all study patients. The authors conducted probability of target attainment analyses using both 65% and 100% of time with unbound drug concentrations across clinically relevant MICs. CONCLUSION: The authors found that their current dosing strategy achieved a probability of target attainment >90% throughout surgery for both total and unbound cefazolin concentrations, independent of cardiopulmonary bypass times.

Population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin in total hip arthroplasty.

Cefazolin is an antibiotic recommended for infection prevention in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the dosing regimen necessary to achieve therapeutic concentrations in obese patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to conduct a population analysis of cefazolin pharmacokinetics (PK) and assess whether cefazolin administration should be weight adapted in THA. Adult patients undergoing THA surgery received an injection of 2000 mg of cefazolin, doubled in the case of BMI > 35 kg/m2 and total body weight > 100 kg. A population PK study was conducted to quantify cefazolin exposure over time compared to the therapeutic concentration threshold. A total of 484 cefazolin measurements were acquired in 100 patients, of whom 29% were obese. A 2-compartment model best fitted the data, and creatinine clearance determined interpatient variability in elimination clearance. Our PK simulations using a 2000 mg cefazolin bolus showed that cefazolin concentrations remained above the threshold throughout surgery, regardless of weight or renal function. A 2000 mg cefazolin single injection without adaptation to weight or renal function and without intraoperative reinjection was efficient in maintaining therapeutic concentrations throughout surgery. The optimal target concentration and necessary duration of its maintenance remain unclear.

Cefazolin prophylaxis in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery - are dosage and timing appropriate? Prospective study using resampling simulation.

OBJECTIVE: Cefazolin is a widely used antimicrobial prophylactic agent, however the appropriate dosage, timing, pharmacology and microbial coverage have not been well-established for gynecologic procedures. We aimed to describe serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of Intravenous cefazolin given to women prior to scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries, and to determine whether appropriate antimicrobial coverage had been achieved in short time from prophylactic administration to surgical start time. METHODS: A prospective cohort analysis study, using a resampled dataset, of women undergoing scheduled gynecological surgeries in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. IV cefazolin (1 or 2 gr) was administered prior to incision to women weighing <80 kg (Group A) and ≥80 kg (Group B), respectively. Cefazolin serum levels were obtained at the time of skin incision (Time 0) and 30 min later (Time 30), measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Appropriate antimicrobial coverage was defined when cefazolin serum levels were above minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for Enterobacteriaceae. RESULTS: Overall, 21 women were included. The mean time interval between drug administration and incision did not differ between the two groups (18 ± 10 min vs. 11 ± 10 min, respectively, p = .0.25). A hierarchical mixed linear regression model, using a simulation of multiple random bootstrap resampling (n = 1,000), revealed that cefazolin serum levels exceeded MIC, regardless of the timing of administration in the sampling intervals. Mean cefazolin serum levels in time 0 and time 30 min were not affected by BMI in patients receiving 1 gr. CONCLUSION: A single dose of IV cefazolin given shortly prior to skin incision provides serum concentrations above minimal inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens in most women undergoing scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dose Selection of Cefazolin for Surgical Prophylaxis of Pediatric Patients.

Cefazolin is an antibiotic frequently used for perioperative prophylaxis. Data from healthy adults and pediatric surgery patients were pooled to refine a previously developed population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and to determine the optimal body weight cutoff for selecting fixed doses of either 1 or 2 g cefazolin to produce exposures in pediatric surgery patients similar to a single 2-g dose in adults. Regardless of dose used, cefazolin was well tolerated in pediatric patients. A total of 1102 plasma samples from 62 patients from 3 studies were available to assess the previous model. The pooled data set allowed for simplification of the model such that allometrically scaled clearance and volume parameters were found to provide a robust fit while removing unnecessary covariate relationships. Monte Carlo simulations using the final cefazolin population PK model suggested an optimal weight cutoff of 50 kg, in contrast to the previously suggested 60 kg for a single 2-g dose. Patients at or above this 50-kg cutoff would receive a 2-g dose of cefazolin, and those below 50 kg but ≥25 kg would receive a 1-g dose of cefazolin.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin before, during and after cardiopulmonary bypass in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

PURPOSE: The aims of the present study were to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of cefazolin for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) for the prophylaxis of surgical site infection (SSI) using cefazolin. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB were enrolled in the prospective study. Blood samples for plasma cefazolin assay were collected, and total and unbound drug concentrations were measured and analysed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) software considering saturable plasma protein binding. Using the PPK model, plasma unbound cefazolin concentration-time courses with current prophylaxis protocols were simulated, and the PTA for common SSI pathogens was estimated. RESULTS: A total of 199 blood samples were obtained from 27 patients. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination plus an on/off CPB compartment best described the data. The population mean for systemic drug clearance (CL) was reduced and that for the volume of distribution (V) was increased during CPB compared with the pre-CPB values. CPB-induced hypoalbuminemia was associated with reduced maximum protein binding (Bmax). The simulation studies suggested that the current dosing protocols are insufficient for attaining PTA > 0.9 throughout surgery against pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >8 mg/L. A new dosing protocol that achieves a PTA > 0.9 for pathogens with a MIC of 16 mg/L was proposed. CONCLUSION: PPK modelling with simulation may be valuable for devising a cefazolin prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

Pregnancy-related pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial prophylaxis during fetal surgery, cefazolin and clindamycin as examples.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis during surgery aims to prevent post-operative site infections. For fetal surgery, this includes the fetal and amniotic compartments. Both are deep compartments as drug equilibrium with maternal blood is achieved relatively late. Despite prophylaxis, chorio-amnionitis or endometritis following ex utero intrapartum treatment or fetoscopy occur in 4.13% and 1.45% respectively of the interventions. This review summarizes the observations on two commonly administered antimicrobials (cefazolin, clindamycin) for surgical prophylaxis during pregnancy, with emphasis on the deep compartments. For both compounds, antimicrobial exposure is on target when we consider the maternal and fetal plasma compartment. In contrast, amniotic fluid concentrations-time profiles display a delayed and much more blunted pattern, behaving as deep compartment. For cefazolin, there are data that document further dilution in the setting of polyhydramnios. Along this deep compartment concept, there is some accumulation during repeated administration, modeled for cefazolin and observed for clindamycin. The relative underexposure to antimicrobials in amniotic fluid may be reflected in the pattern of maternal-fetal complications after fetal surgery, and suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for fetal surgery should be reconsidered. Further studies should be designed by a multidisciplinary team (fetal surgeons, clinical pharmacologists and microbiologists) to facilitate efficient evaluation of antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prior to Bypass Surgery Improves Tissue Penetration.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified preparation of the internal mammary artery as a risk factor significantly impairing antibiotic tissue penetration into the presternal subcutaneous tissue. We, therefore, adapted our dosing schema regarding preoperative timing to overcome this risk factor. METHODS: Eight patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with a left internal mammary artery and vein grafts were included in this clinical trial. Cefazolin (4 g) was administered twice (3 hours and 1 hour) prior to skin incision and once during skin closure (2 g). Antibiotic concentrations were measured with subcutaneous microdialysis probes on both sternal sides. Results were directly compared with the previously published patient cohort receiving the standard schema (4 g cefazolin prior to skin incision and 2 g during closure). RESULTS: All patients (7 male, 1 female, 69 ± 7 years, 26.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2) survived the perioperative period. Mean area under the curve on the right and left sternal side was 117.0 ± 92.5 µg/mL and 114.5 ± 83.2 µg/mL, respectively (p = 0.95). This was well above the previously measured mean peak tissue concentrations without early preoperative antibiotic administration on the side of mammary artery harvesting (52.4 ± 48.5 µg/mL vs. 13.1 ± 5.8 µg/mL; p = 0.039). The %fT > minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus during the first 10 hours in presternal tissue was ≥ 70% but did not differ compared with standard schema. CONCLUSIONS: Early, additional preoperative administration of cefazolin was able to significantly increase peak tissue concentrations during surgery compared with the standard protocol. No difference, however, could be achieved in the percentage of time during which the concentration exceeded the MIC.

Recovery of cefazolin and clindamycin in in vitro pediatric CPB systems.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is often necessary for congenital cardiac surgery, but CPB can alter drug pharmacokinetic parameters resulting in underdosing. Inadequate plasma levels of antibiotics could lead to postoperative infections with increased morbidity. The influence of pediatric CPB systems on cefazolin and clindamycin plasma levels is not known. We have measured plasma levels of cefazolin and clindamycin in in vitro pediatric CPB systems. We have tested three types of CPB systems. All systems were primed and spiked with clindamycin and cefazolin. Samples were taken at different time points to measure the recovery of cefazolin and clindamycin. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to assess if drug recovery was different between the type of CPB system and sampling time point. The experiments were conducted at a tertiary university hospital. 81 samples were analyzed. There was a significant difference in the recovery over time between CPB systems for cefazolin and clindamycin (P < .001). Cefazolin recovery after 180 minutes was 106% (95% CI: 91-123) for neonatal, 99% (95% CI: 85-115) for infant, and 77% (95% CI: 67-89) for pediatric systems. Clindamycin recovery after 180 minutes was 143% (95% CI: 116-177) for neonatal, 111% (95% CI: 89-137) for infant, and 120% (95% CI: 97-149) for pediatric systems. Clindamycin recovery after 180 minutes compared to the theoretical concentration was 0.4% for neonatal, 1.2% for infants, and 0.6% for pediatric systems. The recovery of cefazolin was high in the neonatal and infant CPB systems and moderate in the pediatric system. We found a large discrepancy between the theoretical and measured concentrations of clindamycin in all tested CPB systems.

Lack of Pharmacokinetic Basis of Weight-Based Dosing and Intra-Operative Re-Dosing with Cefazolin Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese Patients: Implications for Antibiotic Stewardship.

Traditionally, there have been uniform antibiotic dosing guidelines for prophylaxis for clean-clean-contaminated surgery in both non-obese and obese adults. All other factors predisposing to surgical site infections (SSIs) being equal, over time, the preferred drug is cefazolin. The usual dose, given immediately pre-procedure, has been 1 g intravenously (IV) in non-penicillin-allergic patients, which has been highly effective, Recently, it has become common practice to use high-dose cefazolin; i.e., 3 g IV, in obese patients. This article reviews the literature on high-dose cefazolin prophylactic regimens in the obese from a pharmacokinetic (PK) point of view. There are no comparative studies to support this approach, which is based largely on the theory "more must be better." Weight-based dosing of cefazolin in the obese is flawed, because it does not take into account PK factors, which are critical in the obese. Cefazolin is a water-soluble (hydrophilic) antibiotic that does not penetrate adipose tissue regardless of IV dose. Importantly, adipose tissue is not a valid target tissue in clean-clean-contaminated SSI prophylaxis, as it does not become infected. Higher doses result in proportionately higher serum/non-adipose tissue concentrations, but adipose tissue concentrations are unaffected. Cefazolin displays time-dependent killing kinetics so that as long as serum/tissue concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of SSI pathogens, there is no enhanced killing with higher concentrations relative to concentration-dependent antibiotics. Taking into account PK principles, a cefazolin 1 g IV bolus results in peak serum concentrations of ∼185 mcg/mL, provides at least six hours of intra-operative protection, aside from any post-antibiotic effects, and eliminates any rationale for intra-operative re-dosing for procedures lasting six hours or less. Some have argued that a cefazolin 3 g IV dose in the obese does not matter, as more must necessarily be better. However, from an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) perspective, unneeded antibiotics are unnecessary. Moreover, the costs of cefazolin 1 g (IV push) at $0.75 versus 2 g (IV piggyback) at $ 6.83 can be significant in large centers using cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiothoracic, orthopedic, obstetric/gynecology, and bariatric surgery. Excessive antibiotics also expose the patient to potential adverse effects; i.e., Clostridium difficile. There is no dose-dependent or duration of exposure effect on resistance with one or two pre-operative or intra-operative doses. Well-done PK-based studies in obese patients clearly demonstrate the lack of benefit of using a 3-g dose or intra-operative re-dosing and show no incremental increase in adipose tissue concentrations with high doses. From an ASP point of view, antibiotic dosing recommendations should be reviewed and revised on the basis of PK principles that indicate that weight-based dosing has no basis for pre-operative prophylaxis in obese patients.

Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin and Vancomycin in Infants Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive bacteria account for nearly three-quarters of all surgical site infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis against these bacteria with cephalosporins or, in select circumstances, with vancomycin is considered standard of care for prevention of surgical site infections. There is little evidence to describe the optimal dosing regimen for surgical site infection prophylaxis in infants undergoing cardiac surgery, and a great deal of institutional variability exists in dosing prophylactic antibiotics. We designed this study to describe an optimal dose regimen for cephalosporin and vancomycin based on pharmacokinetic evidence for infant open-heart surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Two separate cohorts of infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were evaluated. Plasma concentrations of vancomycin (cohort 1, N = 10) and cefazolin (cohort 2, N = 10) were measured, and mixed-effects pharmacokinetic models were constructed for each drug. Simulations of various dosing regimens were performed to describe an appropriate dosing regimen necessary to maintain antibiotic concentrations above the susceptibility cutoff for staphylococci. RESULTS: Both cefazolin and vancomycin plasma concentration versus time profiles were characterized by a 2-compartment model. Subject weight was a significant covariate for V1 for vancomycin. Subject age was a significant covariate for V1 for cefazolin. Cardiopulmonary bypass did not influence concentration versus time profiles. Simulations demonstrated that a 1-hour vancomycin infusion (15 mg·kg), repeated every 12 hours and a 10-minute infusion of cefazolin (30 mg·kg), repeated every 4 hours maintained plasma concentrations above 4 µg·mL and 16 µg·mL, for vancomycin and cefazolin, respectively. Both concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration 90 for most susceptible staphylococci. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment of vancomycin 15 mg·kg infused >1 hour with 12-hour redosing and cefazolin 30 mg·kg infused >10 minutes with 4-hour redosing will maintain serum levels of each antibiotic above the susceptibility cut-offs for susceptible staphylococci in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Cefazolin levels may be adequate for some, but not all, Gram-negative bacteria. The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on pharmacokinetics is negligible.

Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin delivery via the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit priming solution in infants and children.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) who received cefazolin for peri-operative surgical prophylaxis in addition to having cefazolin added to the CPB circuit priming solution. Secondary aims were to determine the pharmacodynamic exposure associated with the addition of cefazolin to the CPB priming solution and to assess whether a target cefazolin concentration range for the CPB priming solution could be identified. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective, open-label pharmacokinetic study was carried out in children from birth to 16 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Forty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and accounted for 492 samples for analysis. Cefazolin concentrations were best described by a one-compartment model with weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution (Vd) with allometric scaling. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) total body CL for the birth-6 month cohort was 0.009 ± 0.006 mL/min/kg with a mean ± SD Vd of 0.59 ± 0.26 L/kg, the mean ± SD total body CL for the 7 month-3 year cohort was 0.01 ± 0.005 mL/min/kg with a mean ± SD Vd of 0.79 ± 0.15 L/kg, and the mean ± SD total body CL for the 4-16 year cohort was 0.007 ± 0.004 mL/min/kg with a mean ± SD Vd of 3.4 ± 0.94 L/kg. The median cefazolin loss in the CPB circuit ranged from 78% to 95% and the median patient cefazolin concentration after CPB circuit detachment ranged from 92 to 197 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that mixing cefazolin in the CPB circuit priming solution was effective in maintaining cefazolin serum concentrations during surgery. If this practice is utilized, re-dosing of cefazolin during the CPB run and upon CPB circuit detachment is most probably not needed. Larger pharmacokinetic studies are warranted.

Intervertebral disc penetration by antibiotics used prophylactically in spinal surgery: implications for the current standards and treatment of disc infections.

PURPOSE: The presence of Propionibacterium acnes in a substantial component of resected disc specimens obtained from patients undergoing discectomy or microdiscectomy has led to the suggestion that this prominent human skin and oral commensal may exacerbate the pathology of degenerative disc disease. This hypothesis, therefore, raises the exciting possibility that antibiotics could play an important role in treating this debilitating condition. To date, however, little information about antibiotic penetration into the intervertebral disc is available. METHODS: Intervertebral disc tissue obtained from 54 microdiscectomy patients given prophylactic cefazolin (n = 25), clindamycin (n = 17) or vancomycin (n = 12) was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography, with cefaclor as an internal standard, to determine the concentration of antibiotic penetrating into the disc tissue. RESULTS: Intervertebral disc tissues from patients receiving the positively charged antibiotic clindamycin contained a significantly greater percentage of the antibacterial dose than the tissue from patients receiving negatively charged cefazolin (P < 0.0001) and vancomycin, which has a slight positive charge (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Positively charged antibiotics appear more appropriate for future studies investigating potential options for the treatment of low-virulence disc infections. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.