The Intraperitoneal Use of Cephazolin: A Novelty in the Prevention of Intra-abdominal Abscess after Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy followed by postoperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics is the standard of care for acute appendicitis and postoperative prevention of intra-abdominal abscesses. The aim of or study was to determine if intraperitoneal irrigation with antibiotics could help prevent intra-abdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive pediatric patients with acute appendicitis who had appendectomy in our Pediatric Surgery Department between August 2020 and February 2022. We compared two groups with similar age and symptoms. The first group (A) was treated with the normal standard of care, i.e., laparoscopic appendectomy and postoperative IV antibiotic therapy. For the second group (B) intraperitoneal cefazoline irrigation was added at the end of the laparoscopic procedure. Postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was diagnosed with ultrasound examination, performed after clinical suspicion/abnormal blood test results. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients (males:females 109:51; median age 10.5 years [range 3-17 years]) who had laparosopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis were included, 82 in group A and 78 in group B. In the first 7 days after surgery, 18 patients in group and 5 in group B developed an intra-abdominal abscess (p < 0.005). Drains were positioned in 38 patients in group A vs. 9 in group B. One patient in group A had a different complication which was infection of the surgical incision. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal cefazoline irrigation at the end of the laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients significantly reduces the formation of intra-abdominal abscesses.

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rates in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Treated with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) are the most common elbow fracture in the pediatric population. In the case of displaced fractures, closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning (CRPP) is commonly performed. Infection rates are between 0 and 7%; however, retrospective studies have shown no benefit of preoperative antibiotics. There continues to be notable variability in antibiotic usage based on surgeon preference and local institutional policy. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of infection in pediatric SCHF patients treated with CRPP. METHODS: Pediatric patients with displaced SCHF who presented to a pediatric hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group I received one dose of prophylactic antibiotics (25 mg/kg cefazolin IV up to 1g or clindamycin 10 mg/kg up to 600 mg/kg IV in the case of cefazolin allergy). Group II received placebo (10-mL prefilled syringe of normal saline). All patients underwent CRPP and casting followed by pin removal 3 to 6 weeks after the initial procedure. The presence of pin-site infection, erythema, drainage, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis was recorded. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-two patients were randomized to receive antibiotics, and 78 patients were randomized to placebo. No difference was seen in the rate of infection between the treatment groups (1.2% in the antibiotic group versus 1.3% in the placebo group; P = 1.00). Presence of purulent drainage (0.0% versus 1.3%; P = 0.49), septic arthritis (0.0% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00), and osteomyelitis (1.2% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00) was similar in both groups. No difference in the need for additional antibiotics (1.2% versus 1.3%; P = 1.00) or additional surgery (1.2% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00) was found between groups. DISCUSSION: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis did not affect the risk of infection in pediatric patients who underwent CRPP for displaced SCHF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261830. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I.

Comparison of the effect between cefazolin/cefuroxime and broad-spectrum antibiotics in preventing post-operative pulmonary infections for smoking patients receiving video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The selection of prophylactic antibiotics for preventing post-operative pulmonary infections in smoking patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery (VATLS) is not clear. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of 572 smoking patients undergoing VATLS with prophylactic cefazolin/cefuroxime or other antibiotics were analyzed. Patients were classified as cefazolin/cefuroxime group and the control group. A 1:1 propensity score matching was also performed. RESULTS: The primary outcome of the incidence of post-operative pulmonary infection did not differ significantly between the two groups (23.7% vs 30.5%, RR = 0.777, 95%CI 0.564 ~ 1.070 p = 0.113). Similarly, secondary outcomes including the incidence of post-operative fever, the white blood cell count and neutrophils on the 3rd day after the surgery, and time for blood routine test recovery were all found without significant difference between the two groups. In the multivariate logistic regression model, no association was found between prophylactic use of cefazolin/cefuroxime and post-operative pulmonary infections after controlling other possible confounding factors (OR = 0.685, 95%CI 0.441 ~ 1.065, p = 0.093). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of cefazolin/cefuroxime was not associated with more adverse clinical outcomes among smoking populations undergoing VATLS when compared with broad-spectrum antibiotics and the two drugs are still feasible for peri-operative prophylactic use for smoking population before the surgery.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Grade 3 Open Fractures: A Retrospective Comparison of Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin Versus Cefazolin Plus Gentamicin.

Background: Because of the established path of bacterial entry and contamination-associated mechanisms, grade 3 open orthopedic fractures represent a substantial infection risk. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines recommended covering Staphylococcus aureus and adding aminoglycoside gram-negative coverage. Local institutional guidelines rely on ceftriaxone for gram negative coverage and add methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage with vancomycin. Patients and Methods: The electronic health records of adults admitted for a grade 3 open fracture between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received cefazolin and gentamicin (CZ+GM) or ceftriaxone and vancomycin (CRO+VA) as prophylaxis were included. We recorded the rate of a composite treatment failure outcome of receipt of antibiotic agents, infection-related hospitalization, or subsequent debridement for injury-site skin and soft tissue infection or osteomyelitis. The presence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was also evaluated. Results: There were 65 patients included in the CZ+GM group and 53 patients in the CRO+VA group. Patients in the CZ+GM group were younger (mean 42.6 compared with 50.6 years; p = 0.02). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between groups' demographics, mechanism and site of injury, timeline of care, or surgical interventions. More patients in the CZ+GM arm met the composite treatment failure outcome, but it was not statistically significant (45% vs. 32%; p = 0.2). There were similar rates of treatment failure at 30 days (21% vs. 26%; p = 0.5) and for only osteomyelitis (8% vs. 9%; p = 1). Conclusions: The trend in numerically lower treatment failure rates in the CRO+VA group across outcomes provides sufficient evidence to continue the current local recommendations. Given our sample size, type 2 error may have occurred, and studies with greater power should analyze this question.

Can Perioperative Antibiotic Choice Impact Rates of Infectious Complications After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Single-Blind, Prospective Randomized Trial.

Objective: National guidelines recommend periprocedural antibiotics before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet it is not clear which is superior. We conducted a randomized trial to compare two guideline-recommended antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (cipro) vs cefazolin, on PCNL outcomes, focusing on the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Methods: Adult patients who were not considered high risk for surgical or infectious complications and undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either cipro or cefazolin perioperatively. All had negative preoperative urine cultures. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including SIRS criteria, intraoperative urine culture, duration of hospitalization, and need for intensive care. SIRS is defined by ≥2 of the following: body temperature <96.8°F or >100.4°F, heart rate >90 bpm, respiratory rate >20 per minute, and white blood cell count <4000 or >12,000 cells/mm3. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled and randomized (79 cefazolin and 68 cipro). All preoperative characteristics were similar (p > 0.05), except for mean age, which was higher in the cipro group (64 vs 57 years, p = 0.03). Intra- and postoperative findings were similar, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05), except a longer mean hospital stay in the cefazolin group (2 hours longer, p = 0.02). There was no difference between SIRS episodes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Despite the relatively broader coverage for urinary tract pathogens with ciprofloxacin, this prospective randomized trial did not show superiority over cefazolin. Our findings therefore support two appropriate options for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCNL who are nonhigh risk for infectious complications.

Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with higher rates of elbow periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common source of failure following elbow arthroplasty. Perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are considered standard of care. However, there are no data regarding the comparative efficacy of various antibiotics in the prevention of PJI for elbow arthroplasty. Previous studies in shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasty have demonstrated higher rates of PJI with administration of non-cefazolin antibiotics. The elbow has higher rates of PJI than other joints. Therefore, this study evaluated whether perioperative antibiotic choice affects rates of PJI in elbow arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution, prospectively collected total joint registry database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary elbow arthroplasty between 2003 and 2021. Elbows with known infection prior to arthroplasty (25) and procedures with incomplete perioperative antibiotic data (7) were excluded, for a final sample size of 603 total elbow arthroplasties and 19 distal humerus hemiarthroplasties. Cefazolin was administered in 561 elbows (90%) and non-cefazolin antibiotics including vancomycin (32 elbows, 5%), clindamycin (27 elbows, 4%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (2 elbows, 0.3%) were administered in the remaining 61 elbows (10%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the association between the antibiotic administered and the development of PJI. Infection-free survivorship was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Deep infection occurred in 47 elbows (7.5%), and 16 elbows (2.5%) were diagnosed with superficial infections. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients receiving non-cefazolin alternatives were at significantly higher risk for any infection (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-5.0; P < .01) and deep infection (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.5; P < .01) compared with cefazolin administration. Multivariable analysis, controlling for several independent predictors of PJI (tobacco use, male sex, surgical indication other than osteoarthritis, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score), showed that non-cefazolin administration had a higher risk for any infection (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.3; P < .01) and deep infection (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.3; P < .01). Survivorship free of infection was significantly higher at all time points for the cefazolin cohort. DISCUSSION: In primary elbow arthroplasty, cefazolin administration was associated with significantly lower rates of PJI compared to non-cefazolin antibiotics, even in patients with a greater number of prior surgeries, which is known to increase the risk of PJI. For patients with penicillin or cephalosporin allergies, preoperative allergy testing or a cefazolin test dose should be considered before administering non-cefazolin alternatives.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis With Ampicillin-sulbactam Compared With Cefazolin for Esophagectomy: Nationwide Inpatient Database Study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis with ampicillin-sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) compared with cefazolin (CEZ) on the short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. BACKGROUND: CEZ is widely used for antimicrobial prophylaxis in esophagectomy without procedure-specific evidence, whereas ABPC/SBT is preferred in some hospitals to target both aerobic and anaerobic oral bacteria. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between July 2010 and March 2019 were extracted from a nationwide Japanese inpatient database. Overlap propensity score weighting was conducted to compare the short-term outcomes [including surgical site infection (SSI), anastomotic leakage, and respiratory failure] between antimicrobial prophylaxis with CEZ and ABPC/SBT after adjusting for potential confounders. Sensitivity analyses were also performed using propensity score matching and instrumental variable analyses. RESULTS: Among 17,772 eligible patients, 16,077 (90.5%) and 1695 (9.5%) patients were administered CEZ and ABPC/SBT, respectively. SSI, anastomotic leakage, and respiratory failure occurred in 2971 (16.7%), 2604 (14.7%), and 2754 patients (15.5%), respectively. After overlap weighting, ABPC/SBT was significantly associated with a reduction in SSI [odds ratio 0.51 (95% CI: 0.43-0.60)], anastomotic leakage [0.51 (0.43-0.61)], and respiratory failure [0.66 (0.57-0.77)]. ABPC/SBT was also associated with reduced respiratory complications, postoperative length of stay, and total hospitalization costs. The proportion of Clostridioides difficile colitis and noninfectious complications did not differ between the groups. Propensity score matching and instrumental variable analyses demonstrated equivalent results. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of ABPC/SBT as antimicrobial prophylaxis for esophagectomy was associated with better short-term postoperative outcomes compared with CEZ.

Trial of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Surgical Prophylaxis in Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam prophylaxis in arthroplasty may reduce surgical-site infections; however, the efficacy and safety are unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult patients without known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization who were undergoing arthroplasty to receive 1.5 g of vancomycin or normal saline placebo, in addition to cefazolin prophylaxis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection within 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 4239 patients underwent randomization. Among 4113 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (2233 undergoing knee arthroplasty, 1850 undergoing hip arthroplasty, and 30 undergoing shoulder arthroplasty), surgical-site infections occurred in 91 of 2044 patients (4.5%) in the vancomycin group and in 72 of 2069 patients (3.5%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.73; P = 0.11). Among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 63 of 1109 patients (5.7%) in the vancomyin group and in 42 of 1124 patients (3.7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23). Among patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 28 of 920 patients (3.0%) in the vancomyin group and in 29 of 930 patients (3.1%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.63). Adverse events occurred in 35 of 2010 patients (1.7%) in the vancomycin group and in 35 of 2030 patients (1.7%) in the placebo group, including hypersensitivity reactions in 24 of 2010 patients (1.2%) and 11 of 2030 patients (0.5%), respectively (relative risk, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.49), and acute kidney injury in 42 of 2010 patients (2.1%) and 74 of 2030 patients (3.6%), respectively (relative risk, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis was not superior to placebo for the prevention of surgical-site infections in arthroplasty among patients without known MRSA colonization. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000642280.).

Comparison of Cefazolin and Ceftriaxone as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pancreatoduodenectomy with Preoperative Drainage: Incidence of Surgical Site Infection and Susceptibility of Bacteria in Bile.

BACKGROUND: The optimal perioperative antimicrobial agent for preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 288 patients who underwent PD after PBD between 2010 and 2020 at our institution. Patients were classified into two groups according to the perioperative antimicrobial agent used (cefazoline [CEZ] group [n = 108] and ceftriaxone [CTRX] group [n = 180]). The incidence of SSI, type of bacteria in intraoperative bile culture (IBC), and antimicrobial susceptibility to prophylactic antimicrobial agents were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of incisional SSI was significantly lower in the CTRX group than in the CEZ group (18% vs. 31%, P = 0.021), whereas the incidence of organ/space SSI in the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent (35% vs. 44%, P = 0.133). Gram-negative rod (GNR) bacteria in the IBC showed better antimicrobial susceptibility in the CTRX group than in the CEZ group. In multivariate analysis, antimicrobial resistance due to GNR was a significant risk factor for incisional SSI (odds ratio, 3.50; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CTRX had better antimicrobial coverage than CEZ for GNR cultured from intraoperative bile samples. In addition, CTRX provides better antimicrobial prophylaxis than CEZ against superficial SSI in patients with PD after PBD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was not a clinical trial and had no registration numbers.

No difference in risk of revision due to infection between clindamycin and cephalosporins as antibiotic prophylaxis in cemented primary total knee replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2005-2020.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis with clindamycin, which is often used in penicillin- or cephalosporin-allergic patients', has been associated with a higher risk of surgical revision for deep prosthetic joint infection (PJI) than cloxacillin in primary total knee replacement (TKR). We aimed to investigate whether clindamycin increases the risk of surgical revisions due to PJI compared with cephalosporins in primary cemented TKR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 59,081 TKRs in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) 2005-2020 was included. 2,655 (5%) received clindamycin and 56,426 (95%) received cephalosporins. Cox regression analyses were performed with adjustment for sex, age groups, diagnosis, and ASA score. Survival times were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using Cox regression with revision for PJI as endpoint. The cephalosporins cefalotin and cefazolin were also compared. RESULTS: Of the TKRs included, 1.3% (n = 743) were revised for PJI. 96% (n = 713) had received cephalosporins and 4% (n = 30) clindamycin for perioperative prophylaxis. Comparing cephalosporins (reference) and clindamycin, at 3-month follow-up the adjusted hazard ratio rate (HRR) for PJI was 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-1.4), at 1 year 0.9 (CI 0.6-1.5), and at 5 years 0.9 (CI 0.6-1.4). Analysis using propensity score matching showed similar results. Furthermore, comparing cefalotin (reference) and cefazolin, HRR was 1.0 (CI 0.8-1.4) at 3 months and 1.0 (CI 0.7-1.3) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in risk of revision for PJI when using clindamycin compared with cephalosporins in primary cemented TKRs. It appears safe to continue the use of clindamycin in penicillin- or cephalosporin-allergic patients.

Plasma concentration of prophylactic cefazolin best correlates with lean body mass measured by bioimpedance analysis in lumbar spine surgery: Results of a pilot study.

The aim of this study was to determine the association between measures of body composition and the concentration of plasma and paraspinal muscle cefazolin. Secondly, we aimed to confirm the efficacy of our hospital dosing regimen in achieving the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at the surgical site. Patients undergoing posterior-based lumbar spine surgery had body composition analysed using bioimpedance analysis. All received 2 g of cefazolin at anaesthetic induction in line with hospital guidelines. Cefazolin concentration was measured in plasma (30-minites) and muscle (30- and 60-minuites) using high-performance liquid chromatography. 20 patients were recruited (mean age 61.5 years; 12 female). Mean plasma cefazolin concentrations were 34.1 +/- 10.2 mg/L; mean muscle concentrations 44.4 +/- 18.6 mg/kg and 43.8 +/- 20.4 mg/kg at 30- and 60-minutes respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant correlation between plasma cefazolin concentration and lean mass weight, absolute body weight, height, dry lean mass, total water, total body water, extracellular and intracellular water volume. Linear regression analysis showed lean mass weight the best predictor of plasma cefazolin concentration. Muscle cefazolin concentration was dependent on the plasma concentration. Using a MIC of 2 mg/L and 2 mg/kg for Staphylococcus aureus, MIC was achieved in all samples. In summary, plasma cefazolin concentration was best predicted by lean body mass. Further work should consider the influence of body composition on antibiotic delivery in extremes of body mass index. Local hospital guidelines are effective at achieving MIC against S. aureus.

Local tissue concentrations of cefazolin during total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following joint arthroplasty are now the leading cause of reoperation and are associated with serious morbidity to the patient, often requiring several staged operations and a prolonged course of parenteral antibiotics. Prophylactic administration of intravenous antibiotics before skin incision is arguably the most important measure to prevent PJI; however, the dose effectiveness of cefazolin in target tissue is not well known. We aimed to identify parameters affecting local tissue concentration (LTC) of cefazolin. METHODS: We performed a literature search using the following keywords: "orthopaedics," "orthopedic," "arthroplasty" and "cefazolin." We included studies that measured LTC of cefazolin from samples obtained during either a total knee or total hip arthroplasty. RESULTS: Of the 332 records screened, we included 10 studies that described LTC of cefazolin. The included studies evaluated dosing (n = 7), procedure type (n = 3), body mass index (n = 1) and tourniquet utilization (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Few studies have measured LTC levels of antibiotics (or levels of cefazolin) to validate current recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. With infection as the leading reason for early reoperation or revision surgery, the parameters affecting LTC during orthopedic procedures need to be further assessed.

Metronidazole for Prevention of Pelvic Cellulitis and Abscess after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Triple-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a postoperative 5-day treatment schedule with vaginal metronidazole added to conventional antibiotic prophylaxis with 2 g cefazolin modifies the risk of pelvic cellulitis (PC) and pelvic abscess (PA) after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, triple-blind, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Two centers dedicated to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery in Colombia. PATIENTS: A total of 574 patients were taken to TLH because of benign diseases. INTERVENTION: Patients taken to TLH were divided into 2 groups (treatment group, cefazolin 2 g intravenous single dose before surgery + metronidazole vaginal ovules for 5 days postoperatively, control group: cefazolin 2 g intravenous single dose + placebo vaginal ovules for 5 days postoperatively). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The absolute frequency (AF) of PC and PA and their relationship with the presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) were measured. There was no difference in AF of PC (AF, 2/285 [0.7%] vs 5/284 [1.7%] in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively; risk ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-5.65; p = .261), nor for PA (AF, 0/285 [0%] vs 2/289 [0.7%]; p = .159, in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively). The incidence of BV was higher in the metronidazole group than the placebo group (42.5% vs 33.4%, p = .026). CONCLUSION: The use of vaginal metronidazole ovules during the first 5 days in postoperative TLH added to conventional cefazolin prophylaxis does not prevent the development of PC or PA, regardless of the patient's diagnosis of BV.

Intraoperative Intra-articular Antibiotic Injection Reduces Infection in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Deep infection is a debilitating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that an intra-articular, intraoperative injection of antibiotics would result in a lower infection rate compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. Before 2007, 164 patients (group A) did not receive intra-articular antibiotics. From 2007 to 2018, 1324 patients (group B) received intra-articular antibiotics. Patients received intra-articular gentamicin at the end of surgery with the addition of 1 g of cefazolin in January 2014. Records were retrospectively reviewed for comorbidities, type of surgery, and infection. The cohort that received intra-articular antibiotics was compared with the cohort that did not to determine the effect of prophylactic intra-articular antibiotic administration in preventing infection. There was 1 deep infection in the antibiotic group compared with 5 in the non-antibiotic group (P<.001). Superficial infections developed in 2 cases of patients treated with antibiotics; there were no superficial infections in patients treated without antibiotics (P=.62). One previous study evaluated intra-articular injection of antibiotics for shoulder arthroplasty and found significantly lower rates of infection with the injection of intra-articular gentamicin. In this retrospective follow-up study, the injection of intra-articular gentamicin or gentamicin and cefazolin effectively decreased rates of postoperative infection. At mean follow-up of 399 days, intra-articular antibiotics at the time of surgery resulted in significantly fewer deep infections. Given the minimal risk of adverse events and minimal cost, this is a valid method of reducing infections in total shoulder arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):310-314.].

A randomized clinical trial of antibiotic treatment duration in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes: 7 days vs until delivery.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes can prolong the interval from membrane rupture to delivery and improve neonatal outcomes. However, the duration of antibiotic treatment for preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes has been rarely compared in prospective studies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for pre-labor rupture of membranes. We performed a randomized controlled trial comparing neonatal morbidity and infantile neurologic outcomes between 2 groups of patients with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes who received antibiotic treatment for 7 days or until delivery, respectively. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective randomized study included patients who were diagnosed with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes between 22+0 weeks and 33+6 weeks of gestation. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous cefazolin (1 g dosage every 12 hours) and oral clarithromycin (500 mg dosage every 12 hours) either for 7 days or until delivery. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01503606. The primary outcome was a neonatal composite morbidity, and the secondary outcome was neurologic outcomes at 12 months of corrected age. We enrolled 151 patients and allocated 75 and 76 of them to the 7-day and until-delivery groups, respectively. Analysis was done by per protocol. RESULTS: After excluding cases lost to follow-up and those with protocol violations, 63 (7-day regimen) and 61 (until-delivery regimen) patients with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes and their babies were compared. There was no significant difference in the pregnancy outcomes, including gestational age at delivery and the interval from rupture of membranes to delivery, between the 2 groups. Among the neonatal outcomes, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, and proven neonatal sepsis did not differ between the groups. However, the rates of respiratory distress syndrome (32.8% vs 50.8%; P=.039) and composite neonatal morbidities (34.4% vs 53.9%; P=.026) were lower in the until-delivery group than in the 7-day group. This difference remained statistically significant after a multivariable analysis adjusting for maternal age, twin pregnancy, antenatal corticosteroids treatment, gestational age at delivery, interval from rupture of membranes to delivery, and clinical chorioamnionitis. Infantile neurologic outcomes were evaluated in 71.4% of the babies discharged alive and did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Overall, the until-delivery regimen of cefazolin and clarithromycin in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes led to a lower incidence of composite neonatal morbidity and respiratory distress syndrome than the 7-day regimen, and both regimens otherwise showed similar individual neonatal morbidities and infantile neurologic outcomes.

Outcome of preoperative cefazolin use for infection prophylaxis in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy.

BACKGROUND: Cephalosporins are the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections. Most studies give a rate of combined IgE and non-IgE penicillin allergy yet it is recommended that cephalosporins be avoided in patients having the former but can be used in those with the latter. Some studies use penicillin allergy while others penicillin family allergy rates. The primary goal of this study was to determine the rates of IgE and non-IgE allergy as well as cross reactions to both penicillin and the penicillin family. Secondary goals were to determine the surgical services giving preoperative cefazolin and the types of self reported reactions that patients' had to penicillin prompting their allergy status. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery at a University Health Sciences Centre were retrospectively studied. The hospital electronic medical record was used for data collection. RESULTS: 8.9% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 0.9% with cefazolin. 4.0% of our patients reported IgE reactions to penicillin with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. 10.5% of our patients reported non-IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 0.8% with cefazolin. 4.3% of our patients reported IgE reactions to the penicillin family with a cross reactivity rate of 4.0% with cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of combined IgE and non-IgE reactions for both penicillin and penicillin family allergy was within the range reported in the literature. Our rate of cross reactivity between cefazolin and combined IgE and non-IgE allergy both to penicillin and the penicillin family were lower than reported in the old literature but within the range of the newer literature. We found a lower rate of allergic reaction to a cephalosporin than reported in the literature. We documented a wide range of IgE and non-IgE reactions. We also demonstrated that cefazolin is frequently the preferred antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical site infections by many surgical services and that de-labelling patients with penicillin allergy is unnecessary.

Staphylococcus aureus Breast Implant Infection Isolates Display Recalcitrance To Antibiotic Pocket Irrigants.

Breast implant-associated infections (BIAIs) are the primary complication following placement of breast prostheses in breast cancer reconstruction. Given the prevalence of breast cancer, reconstructive failure due to infection results in significant patient distress and health care expenditures. Thus, effective BIAI prevention strategies are urgently needed. This study tests the efficacy of one infection prevention strategy: the use of a triple antibiotic pocket irrigant (TAPI) against Staphylococcus aureus, the most common cause of BIAIs. TAPI, which consists of 50,000 U bacitracin, 1 g cefazolin, and 80 mg gentamicin diluted in 500 mL of saline, is used to irrigate the breast implant pocket during surgery. We used in vitro and in vivo assays to test the efficacy of each antibiotic in TAPI, as well as TAPI at the concentration used during surgery. We found that planktonically grown S. aureus BIAI isolates displayed susceptibility to gentamicin, cefazolin, and TAPI. However, TAPI treatment enhanced biofilm formation of BIAI strains. Furthermore, we compared TAPI treatment of a S. aureus reference strain (JE2) to a BIAI isolate (117) in a mouse BIAI model. TAPI significantly reduced infection of JE2 at 1 and 7 days postinfection (dpi). In contrast, BIAI strain 117 displayed high bacterial burdens in tissues and implants, which persisted to 14 dpi despite TAPI treatment. Lastly, we demonstrated that TAPI was effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference (PAO1) and BIAI strains in vitro and in vivo. Together, these data suggest that S. aureus BIAI strains employ unique mechanisms to resist antibiotic prophylaxis treatment and promote chronic infection. IMPORTANCE The incidence of breast implant associated infections (BIAIs) following reconstructive surgery postmastectomy remains high, despite the use of prophylactic antibiotic strategies. Thus, surgeons have begun using additional antibiotic-based prevention strategies, including triple antibiotic pocket irrigants (TAPIs). However, these strategies fail to reduce BIAI rates for these patients. To understand why these therapies fail, we assessed the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus strains, the most common cause of BIAI, to the antibiotics in TAPI (bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin). We found that while clinically relevant BIAI isolates were more susceptible to the individual antibiotics compared to a reference strain, TAPI was effective at killing all the strains in vitro. However, in a mouse model, the BIAI isolates displayed recalcitrance to TAPI, which contrasted with the reference strain, which was susceptible. These data suggest that strains causing BIAI may encode specific recalcitrance mechanisms not present within reference strains.

Does addition of gentamicin for antibiotic prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty reduce the rate of periprosthetic joint infection?

BACKGROUND: First-generation cephalosporins are used as antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty patients. However, this regimen does not address Gram-negative bacteria causing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Previous studies have suggested that the addition of an aminoglycoside as antibiotic prophylaxis in THA reduces surgical site infection (SSI), and less is known on its effect in TKA. This study aimed to investigate if the addition of a single-dose gentamicin, administered pre-operatively, is associated with lower rates of infection in TKA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent primary TKA as treatment for osteoarthritis between January 2011 and April 2021, with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The mean age was 69.9 (± 9.8), the mean BMI was 29.7 (± 5.5), and most patients had American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score of 2-3 (92.9%). Patients were stratified based on the peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis they received: cefazolin with addition of gentamicin (case group) or cefazolin (control group). Our primary study endpoints were rates of PJI and SSI, which were compared between groups using the chi-square test. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 1590 patients, 1008 (63.4%) in the control group and 582 (36.6%) patients in the case group. The total infection rate for patients that received gentamicin dropped by 34%; however, this finding did not reach statistical significance (1.3% (control) vs. 0.86% (case), p = 0.43). The same drop was seen after subdivision of infections to PJI (0.5% vs. 0.34%, 32% drop, p = 0.66) and SSI (0.8% vs. 0.52%, 35% drop, p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of gentamicin administered pre-operatively to a standard antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a statistically significant lower rate of PJI. Although the difference in infection rate did not reach statistical significance, the current study noted a drop in the rate of infection by 1/3 in the gentamicin cohort. Further investigation to evaluate the potential benefit of adding gentamicin to a peri-operative antibiotic regimen is warranted.

Population pharmacokinetics of three alternative prophylactic antibiotics during cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation.

AIMS: The aim of this pharmacokinetic study was to describe and quantify population pharmacokinetics of three antibiotics, cefazolin, ampicillin, and ciprofloxacin, used as antibacterial prophylaxis during cardiovascular surgery with the use of extracorporeal circulation (ECC). METHODS: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with ECC were enrolled to this prospective, pharmacokinetic study. An intravenous bolus of 2 g of ampicillin, 2 g of cefazolin or 400 mg of ciprofloxacin was administered 60-30 min before surgery. Blood samples were collected at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 180 min after the administration and at the end of the surgery. Plasma concentrations of the antibiotics were measured using HPLC methods. Serum concentration-time profiles were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were enrolled into the study, 20 with ampicillin, 25 cefazolin and 9 ciprofloxacin. For all antibiotics, population pharmacokinetic models have been successfully developed. CONCLUSION: We identified estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as the main factor determining the achievement of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target in ampicillin or cefazolin and body weight in ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during cardiac surgery with ECC support.

Infections and Colon Surgery: Preliminary Results from a Surveillance Program in an Italian Hospital.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a valid indicator of the healthcare quality. This study described the preliminary results of one-year active surveillance program on colon surgeries in a hospital in Molise region, central Italy. Patients who had undergone colon surgery according to National Healthcare Safety Network were included. Data on intervention, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and SSIs occurrence were collected. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact test were used to evaluate any association between risk factors and SSIs. Sixty-eight patients (mean age 70.6 years) were included, and 44 (64.7%) were males. The most frequent interventions were right (n = 17, 25.0%) and left (n = 15, 22.0%) hemicolectomy. Surgical interventions were largely elective (n = 43, 63.2%) and with laparotomy (n = 56, 82.4%). During hospital stay, 10 (14.7%) SSIs were detected, including five superficial, three deep and two organ/space infections. Three (4.4%) additional SSIs were detected at post-discharge follow-up, for 13 (19.1%; CI95%: 9.7%-28.5%) total cases detected. Metronidazole plus Ceftriaxone (third generation cephalosporin) was the antibiotics combination mostly used (n = 36, 52.9%) for the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis within 60 minutes of incision. The study underlines the need of improvements of the practices currently adopted, since SSIs could be significantly reduced through a multimodal strategy generating bundles. As third generation cephalosporins may facilitate resistant strains emergence, for perioperative prophylaxis in clean-contaminated interventions with entry into gastrointestinal tract, Cefazolin plus Metronidazole or only second generation cephalosporin are recommended. Due to the large variability of post-intervention antibiotic therapy, antimicrobial stewardship approach is strictly necessary.