Cefepime-induced encephalopathy in an older patient with polypharmacy and renal insufficiency: a case report.

The world population is rapidly aging. Societal aging poses many challenges for individuals, families, nations, and the global healthcare system. Therefore, geriatric care is a crucial issue that demands our attention. In this case report, we describe a woman in her early 70s with multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and renal insufficiency who developed cefepime-induced encephalopathy with moderate to severe cerebral dysfunction during treatment of a urinary tract infection. The patient's consciousness level gradually improved, and no further seizures were observed following the discontinuation of cefepime for several days. This case report underscores the fact that polypharmacy and medication safety are significant concerns that are often overlooked when caring for older patients. The report also highlights the increased susceptibility of older individuals to antibiotic-associated adverse reactions during the management of infectious diseases. Therefore, optimization of antibiotic therapy for older patients is a critical issue that requires thorough investigation and consideration in geriatric care.

Retrospective Observational Assessment of the Impact of Cefepime Prophylaxis in Neutropenic Pediatric Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The potential for cefepime prophylaxis to reduce bloodstream infections (BSIs) in pediatric patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) has been incompletely characterized. METHODS: A retrospective quasi-experimental study of patients under 21 years of age admitted with AML from 2010 through 2018 at two affiliated pediatric tertiary-care hospitals before and after the adoption of routine cefepime prophylaxis for afebrile AML patients during profound neutropenia. RESULTS: The rate of BSIs per 1000 neutropenia days was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group than the baseline group (2.6 vs 15.5, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.32). Interrupted time-series analysis showed that a sharp reduction in BSIs coincided with the implementation of prophylaxis. Bacteremia with viridans group streptococci was frequent in the baseline group but not observed after adopting prophylaxis. Despite the increased use of cefepime, the rate of cefepime-nonsusceptible BSIs per 1000 neutropenia days decreased (1.6 vs 4.1, IRR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.99). The median number of febrile neutropenia episodes per patient also decreased in the prophylaxis group, as did the proportion of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (22/51 (43.1%) vs 26/38 (68.4%); risk difference -25.3%, 95% CI -44.4 to -2.8). A trend was observed toward an increased proportion of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection in the prophylaxis group (10/51 (19.6%) vs 3/38 (7.9%); risk difference 11.7%, 95% CI -3.4 to 29.0). CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in BSIs, febrile neutropenia, and ICU admission among pediatric AML patients.

Case Commentary: Successful Use of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) as a Salvage Therapy for the Treatment of Disseminated Extensively Drug-Resistant New Delhi Metallo-ß-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in an Adult Patient with Acute T-Cell Leukemia.

Multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) are critical antimicrobial resistance threats. Despite their increasing prevalence, treatment options for metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing PA are limited, especially for New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM) producers. Pending further clinical studies, this case provides support for limited-scope use of cefepime-zidebactam for treating disseminated infections secondary to NDM-producing XDR PA. Susceptibilities should be tested and/or alternative regimens considered when treating isolates with alternative MBLs or increased efflux pump expression because some in vitro data suggest associated loss of cefepime-zidebactam susceptibility.

Compassionate use of a novel ß-lactam enhancer-based investigational antibiotic cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) for the treatment of extensively-drug-resistant NDM-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient: a case report.

Infections in critically-ill patients caused by extensively-drug-resistant (XDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa are challenging to manage due to paucity of effective treatment options. Cefepime/zidebactam, which is currently in global Phase 3 clinical development (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04979806, registered on July 28, 2021) is a novel mechanism of action based ß-lactam/ ß-lactam-enhancer combination with a promising activity against a broad-range of Gram-negative pathogens including XDR P. aeruginosa. We present a case report of an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient infected with XDR P. aeruginosa and successfully treated with cefepime/zidebactam under compassionate use. The 50 year old female patient with past-history of bariatric surgery and recent elective abdominoplasty and liposuction developed secondary pneumonia and failed a prolonged course of polymyxins. The organism repeatedly isolated from the patient was a New-Delhi metallo ß-lactamase-producing XDR P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam, susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. As polymyxins failed to rescue the patient, cefepime/zidebactam was administered under compassionate grounds leading to discharge of patient in stable condition. The present case highlights the prevailing precarious scenario of antimicrobial resistance and the need for novel antibiotics to tackle infections caused by XDR phenotype pathogens.

A case-control study of Clostridioides difficile symptomatic infections in a pediatric cancer hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze and identify documented infections and possible risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infections in children with cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study, carried out in a pediatric cancer hospital, covering the years 2016-2019. Matching was performed by age and underlying disease, and for each case, the number of controls varied from 1 to 3. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors. RESULTS: We analyzed 63 cases of documented infection by C. difficile and 125 controls. Diarrhea was present in all cases, accompanied by fever higher than 38°C in 52.4% of the patients. Mortality was similar among cases (n=4; 6.3%) and controls (n=6; 4.8%; p=0.7). In all, 71% of patients in the case group and 53% in the control group received broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to the infection. For previous use of vancomycin, the Odds Ratio for C. difficile infection was 5.4 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.3-12.5); for meropenem, 4.41 (95%CI 2.1-9.2); and for cefepime, 2.6 (95%CI 1.3-5.1). For the antineoplastic agents, the Odds Ratio for carboplatin was 2.7 (95%CI 1.2-6.2), melphalan 9.04 (95%CI 1.9-42.3), busulfan 16.7 (95%CI 2.1-134.9), and asparaginase 8.97 (95%CI 1.9-42.9). CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile symptomatic infection in children with cancer was associated with previous hospitalization and the use of common antibiotics in cancer patients, such as vancomycin, meropenem, and cefepime, in the last 3 months. Chemotherapy drugs, such as carboplatin, melphalan, busulfan, and asparaginase, were also risk factors.

Novel agents in development for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: potential new options facing multiple challenges.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review novel antiinfective agents in development for multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. RECENT FINDINGS: Four novel agents are in various phases of development (tebipenem, durlobactam-sulbactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and xeruborbactam). Tebpipenem is an oral carbapenem with a recently completed phase III trial for complicated urinary tract infections while durlobactam-sulbactam represents a potential alternative for drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii . Cefepime-taniborbactam possesses in-vitro potency against a range of troubling pathogens and we await further information on a recently completed study on complicated urinary tract infection. Finally, xeruborbactam is an ultrabroad beta-lactamase inhibitor that can be paired with a range of intravenous and oral agents. It exhibits enhanced in-vitro activity against many MDR pathogens, including those resistant to newer, broader spectrum options. Data in humans with xeruborbactam are limited. SUMMARY: Each of the newer options reviewed possesses a unique range of in-vitro activity against select, challenging pathogens with some narrowly tailored and other broader in activity. Several have both oral and intravenous formulations. Two agents have presented data from recent phase III trials, whereas two are not as advanced in their clinical programs.

Model for Evaluating Antimicrobial Therapy To Prevent Life-Threatening Bacterial Infections following Exposure to a Medically Significant Radiation Dose.

More evidence is needed to support recommendations for medical management of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and associated infections resulting from a radiological/nuclear event. While current guidelines recommend the administration of antibiotics to chemotherapy patients with febrile neutropenia, the clinical benefit is unclear for acute radiation injury patients. A well-characterized nonhuman primate (NHP) model of hematopoietic ARS was developed that incorporates supportive care postirradiation. This model evaluated the efficacy of myeloid growth factors within 24 to 48 h after total body irradiation (TBI). However, in this model, NHPs continued to develop life-threatening bacterial infections, even when granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was administered in combination with antibiotic monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of combination antibiotic therapies administered to NHPs following 7.4-Gy TBI to understand the occurrence of bacterial infection in NHPs with hematopoietic ARS. We compared enrofloxacin-linezolid, enrofloxacin-cefepime, and enrofloxacin-ertapenem to enrofloxacin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was 60-day postirradiation mortality, with secondary endpoints of overall survival time, incidence of bacterial infection, and bacteriologic culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We observed that enrofloxacin-ertapenem significantly increased survival compared to enrofloxacin monotherapy. Bacteria isolated from nonsurviving macaques with systemic bacterial infections exhibited uniform resistance to enrofloxacin and variable resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, gentamicin, and azithromycin. Multidrug antibiotic resistance was observed in Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli. We conclude that antibiotic combination therapies appear to be more effective than monotherapy alone but acknowledge that more work is needed to identify an optimal antimicrobial therapy.

Smaller but more frequent dosing of cefepime in the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Generally national guidelines for febrile neutropenia recommend treatment with cefepime 2 g every 8 h. Due to beta-lactam's time dependent killing effects, it is hypothesized smaller doses given more frequently might be non-inferior. The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of cefepime 1 g every 6 h versus 2 g every 8 h in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included patients with a diagnosis of febrile neutropenia treated with cefepime during an inpatient encounter. Patients were grouped based on receipt of cefepime 2 g every 8 h (high dose cohort) versus cefepime 1 g every 6 h (low dose cohort). The primary outcome compared the time to defervescence after cefepime initiation between the two dosing strategies. A subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint was conducted in patients who received both cefepime and vancomycin. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included in the high dose cohort, and seventy-six patients were included in the low dose cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the exception of race. The time to defervescence between the high dose cohort and low dose cohort were comparable between groups (49.2 vs. 46.7 h). The time to defervescence in subgroup analysis of patients who received empiric vancomycin and cefepime was 65.7 versus 59.7. CONCLUSION: Patients who received cefepime 1 g every 6 h were found to have similar trends in achieving time to defervescence compared to 2 g every 8 h.

Prospective assessment of breakthrough infections and neurotoxicity and their association with cefepime trough concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Cefepime is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in haematological cancer patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cefepime is frequently advocated. However, it remains unclear what range of concentrations should be targeted for maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. Therefore, we examined the relationship between cefepime exposure and clinical efficacy or neurotoxicity in FN patients. This prospective, observational, single-centre study included all adult hospitalised patients presenting with FN at the haematology ward and treated with cefepime from August 2019 until October 2020. Primary outcomes were incidence of breakthrough infection and neurotoxicity and their relationship with free cefepime serum trough concentrations. A total of 76 patients were included, contributing 96 cefepime treatment courses. The median (interquartile range) estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (eGFRCKD-EPI) and free cefepime trough concentration were 101 (85-112) mL/min/1.73m2 and 8.6 (4.9-16.2) mg/L, respectively. Interpatient and intrapatient variability in cefepime trough concentrations was largely explained by renal function. No cefepime-related breakthrough infections occurred during cefepime treatment. Neurotoxicity, probably induced by cefepime administration, occurred during 6/96 (6.3%) treatment courses. Patients with neurotoxicity showed a significant trend for higher trough concentrations (median 15.4 mg/L vs. 8.6 mg/L; P < 0.001). This study provides real-world clinical data showing that high cefepime dosage is efficacious and safe in FN patients. Routine TDM does not appear to be needed in FN patients with preserved renal function. However, TDM might be reserved for FN patients at high risk of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity or when intended to cover pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration >1 mg/L.

Ecocardiografia Tridimensional na avaliação de endocardite de válvula nativa: um relato de caso e semelhança entre achados ecocardiográficos e cirúrgicos / Three-Dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in native valve endocarditis: a case report and similarities between echocardiography and surgical findings

A endocardite de valva nativa é uma doença incomum, complexa, e de alta morbimortalidade. Requer tratamento clínico prolongado, com várias complicações possíveis, e o seu tratamento cirúrgico é complexo e tecnicamente difícil. O ecocardiograma transtorácico e transesofágico são fundamentais na avaliação da doença, inclusive seus achados são parte dos critérios diagnósticos de endocardite. Adicionalmente, o ecocardiograma tridimensional (3D) contribui com detalhamento anatômico na avaliação das estruturas cardíacas acometidas pela doença. Mostramos um caso em que é ilustrado o papel da ecocardiografia no diagnóstico e avaliação de complicações da endocardite, comparando as imagens do ecocardiograma 3D pré-operatórias, com os achados durante o ato cirúrgico. (AU)

Native valve bacterial endocarditis is an uncommon, complex, and highly morbid disease that requires prolonged clinical treatment and challenging surgical interventions. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography are paramount assessment tools whose findings are included in the diagnostic criteria. Three-dimensional echocardiography shows further realistic imaging details. Here we present a case demonstrating the role of echocardiography in the diagnosis of endocarditis and the identification of its complications to show how advanced imaging techniques may have a remarkable resemblance with in vivo surgical findings. (AU)

Impact of pre-transplant use of antibiotics on the graft-versus-host disease in adult patients with hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: Changes in fecal microbiota affect the incidence and extent of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Most patients with hematological malignancies receive antibiotics for the treatment of febrile neutropenia prior to allogeneic HSCT, and pre-transplant use of antibiotics may influence the fecal microbiota and GVHD. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive adult patients with hematological malignancies who received allogeneic HSCT at Chungnam National University Hospital between 2007 and 2018. Pre-transplant use of antibiotics was defined as the use of antibiotics before conditioning chemotherapy. RESULTS: This study included 131 patients with a median age of 46 (range, 18-71) years: 76 (58%) patients were AML, 28 (21.4%) with ALL, 23 (17.6%) with MDS, and 4 (3.1%) with CML. All patients received calcineurin inhibitors with short-course methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis. A total of 31 (23.7%) patients received anti-thymocyte globulin. All patients received antibiotics prior to HSCT: 70 (53.4%) patients received glycopeptide, 114 (87.0%) received cefepime, 87 (66.4%) received piperacillin/tazobactam, and 51 (38.9%) received carbapenem. Patients who received glycopeptide had more frequently extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) than those who did not (51.1% vs. 28.1% at 5 years) and had more frequently cGVHD of the lung (34.8% vs. 15.8% at 5 years). Pre-transplant use of glycopeptide did not affect the overall survival (OS) or GVHD- and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (median OS; 49 months in glycopeptide group vs. not reached in non-glycopeptide group, p=0.475; median GRFS; 9 months in glycopeptide group vs. 16 months in non-glycopeptide group, p=0.092). CONCLUSION: Pre-transplant use of glycopeptide tends to increase the incidence of extensive cGVHD.

45-year-old man • fever • generalized rash • recent history of calcaneal osteomyelitis • Dx?

► Fever ► Generalized rash ► Recent history of calcaneal osteomyelitis.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 17 de julho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on July 17, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 14 artigos e 13 protocolos.

The cost-effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments for high-risk febrile neutropenic patients: A decision analytic model.

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia has a significant clinical and economic impact on cancer patients. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of different current empiric antibiotic treatments. METHODS: A decision analytic model was constructed to compare the use of cefepime, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and piperacillin/tazobactam for treatment of high-risk patients. The analysis was performed from the perspective of U.S.-based hospitals. The time horizon was defined to be a single febrile neutropenia episode. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating costs and deaths averted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP), were used to address the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The base-case analysis results showed that treatments were equally effective but differed mainly in their cost. In increasing order: treatment with imipenem/cilastatin cost $52,647, cefepime $57,270, piperacillin/tazobactam $57,277, and meropenem $63,778. In the probabilistic analysis, mean costs were $52,554 (CI: $52,242-$52,866) for imipenem/cilastatin, $57,272 (CI: $56,951-$57,593) for cefepime, $57,294 (CI: $56,978-$57,611) for piperacillin/tazobactam, and $63,690 (CI: $63,370-$64,009) for meropenem. Furthermore, with a WTP set at $0 to $50,000, imipenem/cilastatin was cost-effective in 66.2% to 66.3% of simulations compared to all other high-risk options. DISCUSSION: Imipenem/cilastatin is a cost-effective strategy and results in considerable health care cost-savings at various WTP thresholds. Cost-effectiveness analyses can be used to differentiate the treatments of febrile neutropenia in high-risk patients.

Cefepime Versus Cefepime Plus Amikacin as an Initial Antibiotic Choice for Pediatric Cancer Patients With Febrile Neutropenia in an Era of Increasing Cefepime Resistance.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the treatment outcomes before and after the addition of amikacin to cefepime monotherapy as an initial empirical antibiotic treatment in pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: This was a retrospective historical cohort study. The subjects were pediatric cancer patients who visited the emergency room at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, due to chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia, between January 2011 and December 2016. Since September 2014, the empirical antimicrobial treatment regimen for febrile neutropenia was changed from high-dose cefepime monotherapy to combination therapy of adding a single dose of amikacin. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five bacteremia episodes in 164 patients were reported during the study period. Bacteremia caused by cefepime-resistant Gram-negative bacteria was observed in 16% of patients before September 2014 and in 21% of the patients after September 2014 (P = 0.331). Use of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatments increased from 62% to 83% following addition of amikacin to cefepime treatment (P = 0.003). The duration of fever was shorter in the cefepime plus amikacin group than in the cefepime group (22 vs. 34 hours, P = 0.014); however, rates of septic shock and pediatric intensive care unit hospitalizations were not significantly different between the 2 groups (septic shock, both 7%, P = 0.436; pediatric intensive care unit 3% vs. 1%, P = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: We observed no additional benefit of amikacin addition to high-dose cefepime monotherapy. Therefore, adding amikacin to cefepime monotherapy in conditions where cefepime-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia amounts to 20% or less may not be justified.

Heteroresistance to cefepime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia.

INTRODUCTION: Heteroresistance to antibiotic agents can lead to diagnostic and therapeutic failures; however, to date, cefepime heteroresistance (FEP-HR) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) bacteraemia has not been characterised. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the molecular epidemiology, mechanisms and risk factors for cefepime-heteroresistant P. aeruginosa bacteraemia over approximately 6 years in Southwest China. RESULTS: A high prevalence (57.3%) of heteroresistance to cefepime was observed during the study period, and these FEP-HR isolates were not clonally related. Mechanistic studies revealed that AmpC hyperproduction contributed to the development of this phenomenon. In addition, patients with advanced age, haematological malignancies, central venous catheters, and previous cephalosporin therapy were identified as independent risk factors for acquiring FEP-HR P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Furthermore, patients infected with FEP-HR were generally at a greater risk for an adverse prognosis compared with those with non-FEP-HR. More importantly, characterisation of three successive P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from the same patient revealed that heteroresistance can act as an intermediate stage during the evolution from susceptibility to full resistance in patients undergoing antibiotic therapy for prolonged periods. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasised the necessity of antimicrobial stewardship programs in clinical settings, as well as the need for some rapid screening methods for detecting this phenomenon.

Risk factors for cefepime nonsusceptible Gram-negative infections in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients undergo myelosuppressive chemotherapy to allow engraftment of stem cells and are at particularly high risk for bacterial infections and adverse outcomes. Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant are at increased risk for healthcare-associated infections, including infections with multidrug-resistant pathogens. Cefepime is a commonly prescribed antibiotic for empiric therapy in hematopoietic cell transplant patients, but there is minimal data describing cefepime resistance rates, risk factors for resistance, and clinical outcomes associated with cefepime-resistant infections. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years old) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with a culture positive for a gram-negative rod between January 2010 and January 2016 were spilt into two groups: cefepime susceptible and cefepime nonsusceptible . The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors for cefepime nonsusceptible through multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included (27 cefepime nonsusceptible, 80 cefepime-susceptible), yielding a 25.2% nonsusceptibility rate. Multivariable analysis yielded age >60 years old, Klebsiella spp. infection, Acinetobacter spp. infection, healthcare exposures within 90 days, acute gastrointestinal graft-vs-host-disease, and chronic graft-vs-host-disease at multiple locations as significant risk factors for cefepime nonsusceptible. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of the model was 0.851. Thirty-day all-cause mortality (29.6% versus 16.3%, p = 0.13) and length of hospitalization (19 versus 12.5 days, p = 0.0650) were numerically higher in the cefepime nonsusceptible group. CONCLUSIONS: Hematopoietic cell transplant patients with acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease, extensive chronic graft-vs-host-disease, advanced age, previous healthcare exposures, or infections with Klebsiella and Acinetobacter are at increased risk for cefepime nonsusceptible. Patients infected with cefepime nonsusceptible pathogens may have higher rates of mortality and length of hospitalization.

Carbapenem versus Cefepime or Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Empiric Treatment of Bacteremia Due to Extended-Spectrum-ß-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy.

Infections with extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli are common in patients with hematologic malignancy. The utility of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam as empiric therapy for ESBL-producing E. coli bacteremia in patients with hematologic malignancy is largely unknown. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort review of 103 adult inpatients with leukemia and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients with monomicrobial ESBL-producing E. coli bacteremia. No association between increased 14-day mortality and empiric treatment with cefepime (8%) or piperacillin-tazobactam (0%) relative to that with carbapenems (19%) was observed (P = 0.19 and P = 0.04, respectively). This observation was consistent in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding and an inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards model. Both fever and persistent bacteremia were more common in patients treated empirically with cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. Empiric treatment with cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam did not result in increased mortality relative to that with treatment with carbapenems in patients with hematologic malignancy and ESBL-producing E. coli bacteremia, although most patients were changed to carbapenems early in treatment. However, due to prolonged fever and persistent bacteremia, their role may be limited in this patient population.