Evaluation of antibiotic utilization pattern and economic outcomes associated with surgical site infection in surgical department of tertiary care hospitals Karachi, Pakistan.

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) has an enormous impact on patients' quality of life. SSIs further stresses on allocation of different health care resources and contribute significantly in terms of high cost of care. This was a prospective study carried out in tertiary care hospitals of Karachi, Pakistan, involving abdominal surgeries and few other surgeries, in patients having 20 years of age and above, were admitted from June 2016 to May 2017. Total number of 554 patients were included. Data was collected in all relevant areas including utilization pattern of antibiotics, cost in term of infected and uninfected patients, the duration of patient stay etc. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. P value less than 0.005 was taken as significant. Single therapy of co amoxiclav or along with metronidazole and third generation cephalosporin were the most common prescribed antimicrobial groups. Amikacin most commonly used to treat post-surgical wound infection. Economic cost was high in terms of SSI patients. Duration of stay was found longer in infected patients. It can be concluded that SSI, may prolong length of hospitalization, cause morbidity, upsurge the health care cost and even may lead to mortality.

The Financial Implications of a Single-Use Device Reprocessing Program at a Tertiary Referral Center Surgical Department.

The operating room has been identified as one of the primary contributors to waste and energy expenditure in the health care system. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of single-use device reprocessing and report the cost savings, waste diversion, and reduction in carbon emissions. Data was collected from January 2021 to April 2023. Medline collected the data for analysis and converted it from an Excel file format to SPSS (Version 27) for analysis. Descriptive frequencies were used for data analysis. We found a mean monthly cost savings of $16,051.68 and a mean 700.68 pounds of waste a month diverted, resulting in an estimated yearly saving of $2354.29 in disposal costs and a reduction of 1112.65 CO2e emissions per month. This program has made significant contributions to cost savings and environmental efforts.

Resource utilization and outcomes in emergency general surgery during the COVID19 pandemic: An observational cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: Over the course of the COVID19 pandemic, global healthcare delivery has declined. Surgery is one of the most resource-intensive area of medicine; loss of surgical care has had untold health and economic consequences. Herein, we evaluate resource utilization, outcomes, and healthcare costs associated with unplanned surgery admissions during the height of the pandemic in 2020 versus the same period in 2019. METHODS: Retrospective analysis on patients ≥18 years admitted from the emergency department to General & Digestive and Gastrointestinal Surgery Services between February and May 2019 and 2020 at our center; clinical outcomes and unadjusted and adjusted per-person healthcare costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Consults and admissions to surgery declined between February and May 2020 by 37% and 19%, respectively, relative to the same period in 2019, with even greater relative decline during late March and early April. Time between onset of symptoms to diagnosis increased from 2±3 days 2019 to 5±22 days 2020 (P = 0.01). Overall hospital stay was two days less in 2020 (P = 0.19). Complications (Comprehensive Complication Index 10.3±23.7 2019 vs. 13.9±25.5 2020, P = 0.10) and mortality rates (3% vs. 4%, respectively, P = 0.58) did not vary. Mean unadjusted per-person costs for patients in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts were 5,886.72€±12,576.33€ and 5,287.62±7,220.16€, respectively (P = 0.43). Following multivariate analysis, costs remained similar (4,656.89€±390.53€ 2019 vs. 4,938.54±406.55€ 2020, P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare delivery and spending for unplanned general surgery admissions declined considerably due to COVID19. These results provide a small yet relevant illustration of clinical and economic ramifications of this healthcare crisis.

[Nutritional screening in hospitalized patients with vascular disease - The relationship of nutritional risk with clinical and economic outcomes in a surgery department]. / Cribado nutricional del paciente con patología vascular hospitalizado: relación del riesgo nutricional con los resultados clínicos y económicos en un servicio quirúrgico.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: disease-related malnutrition has a negative impact on the outcome in surgical patients. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of nutritional risk in the field of vascular surgery, as well as its consequences on patient outcome and health expenditure. Patients and methods: this is a prospective, observational study conducted during 6 months in a vascular surgery ward at the University Hospital of León, Spain. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool was used to obtain data on admission and then every 7 days until hospital discharge. Clinical variables, surgical intervention performed, medical-surgical complications, hospital stay, healthcare costs, and early readmissions were studied. Results: a total of 104 patients, 84.6 % males, with a mean age of 69 (SD: 13) years were enrolled. Of these, 46.2 % were admitted due to peripheral arterial disease; 10.6 % had a positive MUST at the time of admission and 19.2 % at discharge; 100 % of malnourished patients at admission remained in the same situation at discharge. During hospitalization, in 29 patients (27.9 %) the nutritional situation worsened. In all, 81.25 % of patients who experienced worsening of their MUST score had been admitted urgently (p < 0.05). Patients who required urgent surgery significantly worsened in terms of their nutritional status (p < 0.001). Patients with worsening nutritional status obtained higher rates for: surgical reintervention (p < 0.05), pharmaceutical expense (p = 0.017), total hospital expense (€1,000/patient/admission), transfers to chronic care centers (p = 0.0002), and number of early readmissions (p = 0.017). Conclusion: patients with nutritional risk suffered an increase in medical-surgical complications, hospital stay, healthcare costs, and re-admission rates. Therefore, we consider that an implementation of screening procedures and the development of further studies in the vascular surgery setting are necessary.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción y objetivos: la desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad produce un impacto negativo en la evolución del paciente quirúrgico. Nuestro objetivo es valorar la prevalencia del riesgo nutricional en el ámbito de la cirugía vascular y sus consecuencias en la evolución del paciente y el gasto sanitario. Pacientes y métodos: estudio observacional prospectivo realizado durante 6 meses en la planta de cirugía vascular del Hospital Universitario de León. Se utilizó la herramienta Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) para recoger datos al ingreso y cada 7 días hasta el alta hospitalaria. Se estudiaron las variables clínicas, la intervención quirúrgica realizada, las complicaciones médico-quirúrgicas, la estancia hospitalaria, los costes sanitarios y los reingresos precoces. Resultados: el estudio contó con 104 pacientes, de los que el 84,6 % eran varones, cuya media de edad era de 69 años (DE: 13). El 46,2 % habían ingresado por enfermedad arterial periférica. El 10,6 % presentaban un MUST positivo al ingreso y el 19,2 % lo presentaban al alta; el 100 % de los pacientes desnutridos al ingreso permanecían en la misma situación al alta. Durante la hospitalización, en 29 pacientes (27,9 %) empeoró la situación nutricional. El 81,25 % de los pacientes que sufrieron empeoramiento del MUST habían ingresado de forma urgente (p < 0,05). Los pacientes que habían precisado una cirugía urgente empeoraron significativamente en términos de su estado nutricional (p < 0,001). Los pacientes con empeoramiento del estado nutricional obtuvieron mayores porcentajes de: reintervención quirúrgica (p < 0,05), gasto farmacéutico (p = 0,017), gasto hospitalario total (1000 €/paciente/ingreso), traslados a centros de cuidados crónicos (p = 0,0002) y número de reingresos precoces (p = 0,017). Conclusiones: los pacientes en riesgo nutricional se asociaron a un incremento de las complicaciones médico-quirúrgicas, de la estancia hospitalaria, del coste sanitario y de la tasa de reingresos, por lo que consideramos necesaria la implantación de cribados y el desarrollo de estudios en el ámbito de la cirugía vascular.

The Impact of FASTPASS: A Collaboration With Emergency Department to Improve Management of Patients With Gallbladder Disease and Acute Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Efficient Emergency Department (ED) throughput depends on several factors, including collaboration and consultation with surgical services. The acute care surgery service (ACS) collaborated with ED to implement a new process termed "FASTPASS" (FP), which might improve patient-care for those with acute appendicitis and gallbladder disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of FP. METHODS: FASTPASS is a joint collaboration between ACS and ED. ED physicians were provided with a simple check-list for diagnosing young males (<50-year old) with acute appendicitis (AA) and young males or females (<50-year old) with gallbladder disease (GBD). Once ED deemed patients fit our FP check-list, patients were directly admitted (FASTPASSed) to the observation unit. The ACS then came to evaluate the patients for possible surgical intervention. We performed outcome analysis before and after the institution of the FP. Outcomes of interest were ED length of stay (LOS), time from ED to the operating room (OR) (door-to-knife), hospital LOS (HLOS), and cost. RESULTS: During our 1-year study period, for those patients who underwent GBD/AA surgery, 56 (26%) GBD and 27 (26%) AA patients met FP criteria. Compared to the non-FP patients during FP period, FP halved ED LOS for GBD (7.4 ± 3.0 versus 3.5 ± 1.7 h, P < 0.001) and AA (6.7 ± 3.3 versus. 1.8 ± 1.6 h, P < 0.001). Similar outcome benefits were observed for door-to-knife time, HLOS, and costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the FP process improved ED throughput in a single, highly-trained ER leading to an overall improved patient care process. A future study involving multiple EDs and different disease processes may help decrease ED overcrowding and improve healthcare system efficiency.

Comparison of Safety and Insurance Payments for Minor Hand Procedures Across Operative Settings.

Importance: Surgical procedures can be performed in different settings, but the association between the operative setting and patient safety and cost to the patient and payer is unknown. Objective: To examine differences in complications, total payments, and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending for minor hand surgical procedures performed in office, ambulatory surgery center (ASC), and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) operative settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted using deidentified claims data from private employer-sponsored health insurance from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017. Patients aged 18 years or older undergoing carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, excision of wrist ganglion, and excision of small hand masses (N = 468 365) were included. Exposures: Operative setting, defined as procedures performed in the clinic setting, ASC, and HOPD. Main Outcomes and Measures: Complications during the 90-day postoperative period, total payments (total facility and payer reimbursement), and OOP spending. Results: Of the 468 365 patients, 296 378 women (63.3%) and 171 987 men (36.7%) underwent minor hand surgical procedures from 2009 to 2017, with 284 889 procedures (60.8%) performed in HOPDs, 158 659 procedures (33.9%) performed in ASCs, and 24 817 procedures (5.3%) performed in the office setting. Ninety-day complications occurred in 3.4% of procedures performed in HOPDs, 3.3% in ASCs, and 2.9% in office settings (P < .001). After controlling for patient characteristics, procedures performed outside of the office had higher odds of complications (HOPDs: odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22-1.43; ASCs: OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34). Compared with the office setting, procedures performed in HOPDs incurred an extra $1216 in total payments (95% CI, $1184-$1248) and $115 in OOP expenses (95% CI, $109-$121). Procedures performed in ASCs cost an additional $709 (95% CI, $676-$741) and $140 in OOP expenses (95% CI, $134-$146). Transitioning ASC and HOPD procedures to the office setting could have saved an estimated $6 million annually in OOP expenses during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that minor hand surgery performed in the office setting is safe and less costly compared with ambulatory and hospital-based operations. Shifting minor surgical procedures to the office setting may lead to substantial cost savings for payers and patients without compromising care quality.

The likely economic impact of fewer elective surgical procedures on US hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To help control the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, elective procedures have been cancelled in most US hospitals by government order. The purpose of this study is to estimate national hospital reimbursement and net income losses owing to elective surgical procedure cancellation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample and the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample were used to identify all elective surgical procedures performed in the inpatient setting and in hospital-owned outpatient surgery departments throughout the United States. Total cost, reimbursement, and net income was determined for all elective surgical procedures. RESULTS: The estimated total annual cost of elective inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures in the United States was $147.2 billion, and estimated total hospital reimbursement was $195.4 to $212.2 billion. This resulted in a net income of $48.0 to $64.8 billion per year to the US hospital system. Cancellation of all elective procedures would result in estimated losses of $16.3 to $17.7 billion per month in revenue and $4 to $5.4 billion per month in net income to US hospitals. CONCLUSION: Cancellation of elective procedures during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has a substantial economic impact on the US hospital system.

Payments for outpatient joint replacement surgery: A comparison of hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare commercial insurance payments for outpatient total knee and hip replacement surgeries performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). DATA SOURCES: A large national claims database that contains information on actual prices paid to providers over the period 2014-2017. DATA COLLECTION: We identified all patients receiving total knee replacement surgery and total hip replacement surgery in HOPDs and in ASCs for each of the 4 years. STUDY DESIGN: For each year, we conducted descriptive and statistical patient-level analyses of the facility component of payments to HOPDs and to ASCs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For each procedure and for each year, ASC payments exceeded HOPD payments by a wide margin; however, the gap across settings declined over time. In 2014, knee replacement payments to HOPDs (n = 67) were $6016 compared to $23 244 in ASCs (n = 68). By 2017, payments to HOPDs (n = 223) had grown to $10 060 compared to $18 234 in ASCs (n = 602). Similarly, for hip replacements, HOPD payments (n = 43) rose from $6980 in 2014 to $11 139 in 2017 (n = 206) and in ASCs fell from $28 485 in 2014 (n = 82) to $18 595 in 2017 (n = 465). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that for total joint replacement, common perceptions of cost savings from transition of services from hospitals to ASCs may be misguided.

Cost-effectiveness comparison of routine transfusion with restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies for surgical patients in China.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A health industry standard recommending restrictive transfusion is to be in effect in China in April 2019. We aim to explore its potential economic and clinical impacts among surgical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision tree model was applied to compare cost-effectiveness of current routine transfusion in China, a restrictive (transfusion at Hb < 8 g/dl or ischaemic symptoms) and a liberal (transfusion at Hb < 10 g/dl) strategy. Parameters were estimated from empirical data of 25 227 surgical inpatients aged ≥30 years in a multicenter study and supplemented by meta-analysis when necessary. Results are shown for cardio-cerebral-vascular (CCV) surgery and non-CCV (orthopaedics, general, thoracic) surgery separately. RESULTS: Per 10 000 patients in routine, restrictive, liberal transfusion scenarios, total spending (transfusion and length of stay related) was 7·67, 7·58 and 9·39 million CNY (1 CNY × 0.157 = 1 US dollar) for CCV surgery and 6·35, 6·70 and 8·09 million CNY for non-CCV surgery; infectious and severe complications numbered 354, 290, and 290 (CCV) and 315, 286, and 330 (non-CCV), respectively. Acceptability curves showed high probabilities for restrictive strategy to be cost-effective across a wide range of willingness-to-pay values. Such findings were mostly consistent in sensitivity and subgroup analyses except for patients with cardiac problems. CONCLUSION: We showed strong rationale, succeeding previous findings only in cardiac or joint procedures, to comply with the new standard as restrictive transfusion has high potential to save blood, secure safety, and is cost-effective for a wide spectrum of surgical patients. Experiences should be further summarized to pave the way towards individualized transfusion.

Enhancing the emergency general surgical service: an example of the aggregation of marginal gains.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to enhance the emergency general surgical service in our high-volume centre in order to reduce four-hour target breaches, to expedite senior decision making and to avoid unnecessary admissions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aggregation of marginal gains theory was applied. A dual consultant on-call system was established by the incremental employment of five emergency general surgeons with a specialist interest in colorectal or oesophagogastric surgery. A surgical ambulatory care unit, which combines consultant-led clinical review with dedicated next-day radiology slots, and a dedicated working week half-day gastrointestinal urgent theatre session were instituted to facilitate ambulatory care pathways. RESULTS: The presence of two consultant surgeons being on call during weekday working hours decreased the four-hour target breaches and allowed consultant presence in the surgical ambulatory care clinic and the gastrointestinal urgent theatre list. Of 1371 surgical ambulatory care clinic appointments within 30 months, 1135 (82.7%) avoided a hospital admission, corresponding to savings of £309,752 . The coordinated functioning of the surgical ambulatory care clinic and the gastrointestinal urgent theatre list resulted in statistically significantly reduced hospital stays for patients operated for abscess drainage (gastrointestinal urgent theatre median 11 hours (interquartile range 3, 38) compared with emergency median 31 hours (interquartile range 24, 53), P < 0.001) or diagnostic laparoscopy/appendicectomy (gastrointestinal urgent theatre median 52 hours (interquartile range 41, 71) compared with emergency median 61 hours (interquartile range 43, 99), P = 0.005). Overnight surgery was reduced with only surgery that was absolutely necessary occurring out of hours. CONCLUSION: The expansion of the 'traditional' on-call surgical team, the establishment of the surgical ambulatory care clinic and the gastrointestinal urgent theatre list led to marginal gains with a reduction in unnecessary inpatient stays, expedited decision making and improved financial efficiency.

Patients with acute cholecystitis should be admitted to a surgical service.

BACKGROUND: In bowel obstruction and biliary pancreatitis, patients receive more expedient surgical care when admitted to surgical compared with medical services. This has not been studied in acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and cost data from July 2013 to September 2015 for patients with cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary care inpatient hospital. One hundred ninety lower-risk (Charlson-Deyo) patients were included. We assessed admitting service, length of stay (LOS), time from admission to surgery, time from surgery to discharge, number of imaging studies, and total cost. RESULTS: Patients admitted to surgical (n = 106) versus medical (n = 84) service had shorter mean LOS (1.4 days vs. 2.6 days), shorter time from admission to surgery (0.4 days vs. 0.8 days), and shorter time from surgery to discharge (0.8 days vs. 1.1 days). Surgical service patients had fewer CT (38% vs. 56%) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5% vs. 16%) studies. Cholangiography (30% vs. 25%) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (3 vs. 8%) rates were similar. Surgical service patients had 39% lower median total costs (US $7787 vs. US $12572). CONCLUSION: Nonsurgical admissions of patients with cholecystitis are common, even among lower-risk patients. Routine admission to the surgical service should decrease LOS, resource utilization and costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Implementation of Robotic Surgery in a Pediatric Hospital: Lessons Learned.

BACKGROUND: Since the late 1980s, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been one of the fastest growing approaches for surgical procedures. However, its development has reached a plateau. One of the reasons is the difficulty to operate on more complex cases, such as neonatal procedures. Some experts report outstanding outcomes for complex operations, but not all surgeons may be able to achieve the same results. Is robotic surgery (RS) a solution? METHODS: To answer this question, we reviewed the current indications of RS for the pediatric population and the steps needed to incorporate the robotic surgical system in a children's hospital. We reported our experience and presented our first results and the encountered problems. RESULTS: After a year and a half of experience with RS, several lessons were learned: (1) the current robotic surgical system cannot yet be considered a replacement to conventional MIS, (2) docking is less time consuming than expected, (3) postoperative pain is significantly decreased, (4) the absence of haptic feedback is still a matter of concern, and (5) costs can be afforded by sharing the RS with adult surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, the advantages seem to outweigh the drawbacks as it encourages team building and increases overall comfort for the surgeon. However, the current literature fails to prove that RS gives better results for pediatric patients. New advances in technology will probably help to overcome the encountered difficulties and the high costs.

Analysis of an overlapping surgery policy change on costs in a high-volume neurosurgical department.

OBJECTIVE: Overlapping surgery remains a controversial topic in the medical community. Although numerous studies have examined the safety profile of overlapping operations, there are few data on its financial impact. The authors assessed direct hospital costs associated with neurosurgical operations during periods before and after a more stringent overlapping surgery policy was implemented. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of nonemergency neurosurgical operations that took place during the periods from June 1, 2014, to October 31, 2014 (pre-policy change), and from June 1, 2016, to October 31, 2016 (post-policy change), by any of the 4 senior neurosurgeons authorized to perform overlapping cases during both periods. Cost data as well as demographic, surgical, and hospitalization-related variables were obtained from an institutional tool, the Value-Driven Outcomes database. RESULTS: A total of 625 hospitalizations met inclusion criteria for cost analysis; of these, 362 occurred prior to the policy change and 263 occurred after the change. All costs were reported as a proportion of the average total hospitalization cost for the entire cohort. There was no significant difference in mean total hospital costs between the prechange and postchange period (0.994 ± 1.237 vs 1.009 ± 0.994, p = 0.873). On multivariate linear regression analysis, neither the policy change (p = 0.582) nor the use of overlapping surgery (p = 0.273) was significantly associated with higher total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: A more restrictive overlapping surgery policy was not associated with a reduction in the direct costs of hospitalization for neurosurgical procedures.

Management of acute appendicitis in an acute surgical unit: a cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: The acute surgical unit (ASU) model of acute general surgery care offers efficient patient assessment, improved clinical outcomes and has been demonstrated to be cost-efficient. Despite this, the management of acute appendicitis in our ASU was found to be highly cost-negative. This study sought to identify the drivers of increased cost. METHODS: A retrospective cost analysis of all patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis in 2016 was undertaken to investigate the drivers of increased cost. The patient-level costing approach was used to assign cost to patients. RESULTS: The ASU management of uncomplicated appendicitis was found to have made a net loss of $625 000 in 2016. This study identified that the three largest cost drivers in appendicitis care were hospital overheads, bed day length of admission cost and operating theatre costs. Radiology, pathology and pharmacy costs did not affect total cost significantly. CONCLUSION: Two key targets for improvement were identified. First, reduced theatre turnaround times will allow more efficient theatre utilization. Second, improved after-hours and weekend theatre availability will reduce preoperative waiting time-related cost.

[Clinical and economic implications of disease-related malnutrition in a surgical service]. / Repercusiones clínicas y económicas de la desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad en un servicio quirúrgico.

INTRODUCTION: disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is currently a major challenge in our hospitals, both because of its high prevalence and because of the clinical and economic impact. Our study aims to assess the feasibility and importance of establishing a nutritional screening strategy in our Health Care System. PATIENTS AND METHODS: this is a prospective study carried out in a Surgery Ward. The nutritional risk was assessed by applying to patients MUST at admission and weekly until discharge. Nutritional evaluation and nutritional intervention were performed if required, as well as coding of diagnoses and nutritional procedures at discharge. Clinical data, length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs were analyzed. RESULTS: MUST detected 15.6% of patients at risk of malnutrition at admission. Patients with malnutrition at admission (MA) had four days longer LOS, higher annual mortality rate and urgent hospital readmissions in 2.4 and 2.0 times, respectively, one year after discharge. Age and urgent hospital admission were the factors associated with a higher annual mortality rate. Nine per cent of patients with an initial MUST < 2 suffered deterioration in their nutritional status during admission (DNS). These patients had longer LOS in seven days with equal comorbidity. Considering only the costs related to LOS in patients who presented MA or DNS, an overcost of 57% and 145%, respectively, was observed. CONCLUSION: patients with malnutrition on admission had longer LOS, higher mortality rate and urgent hospital readmissions one year after discharge. Patients who present MA or DNE cause an economic cost overrun. A nutritional screening tool is essential for the management and early detection of DRM.

[Impact of an automated dispensing system for medical devices in cardiac surgery department]. / Impact de l'implantation d'armoires sécurisées dédiés aux dispositifs médicaux dans un service de chirurgie cardiaque.

To secure medical devices' management, the implementation of automated dispensing system in surgical service has been realized. The objective of this study was to evaluate security, organizational and economic impact of installing automated dispensing system for medical devices (ASDM). The implementation took place in a cardiac surgery department. Security impact was assessed by comparing traceability rate of implantable medical devices one year before and one year after installation. Questionnaire on nurses' perception and satisfaction completed this survey. Resupplying costs, stocks' evolution and investments for the implementation of ASDM were the subject of cost-benefit study. After one year, traceability rate is excellent (100%). Nursing staffs were satisfied with 87.5% by this new system. The introduction of ASDM allowed a qualitative and quantitative decrease in stocks, with a reduction of 30% for purchased medical devices and 15% for implantable medical devices in deposit-consignment. Cost-benefit analysis shows a rapid return on investment. Real stock decrease (purchased medical devices) is equivalent to 46.6% of investment. Implementation of ASDM allows to secure storage and dispensing of medical devices. This system has also an important economic impact and appreciated by users.

Postoperative Investigations Resulting in Cost Reduction in Oncological Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery.

AIM: Rising costs in health care are of progressively growing interest and a major factor affecting hospitalization costs is represented by postoperative complications. Complications of Major Abdominal Surgery (MAS) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study estimates the costs of postoperative care associated with complications. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 254 patients admitted to the 1st General and Oncological Surgery Clinic of the Bucharest Oncology Institute who were submitted to MAS. The total hospitalization, complications and treatment costs were analysed. Results: For a patient undergoing MAS, the average costs for surgery without complications are 5,791.3 RON and reach an average of 20,806 RON after major complications. CONCLUSION: The results provide insight into the costs of hospitalization for oncology patients submitted to surgical interventions. Complications occur in 20.86% of patients undergoing MAS and account for 50% of total care costs. Establishing and implementing a protocol aimed at early diagnosis and treatment of specific complications could lead to a decrease in morbidity and mortality, as well as of the costs of hospitalization.

Workforce Issues in Pediatric Surgery.

High salaries indicate a demand for pediatric surgeons in excess of the supply, despite only a slight growth in the pediatric-age population and a sharp increase in numbers of trainees. Top-level neonatal intensive care units require 24-hour-7-day pediatric surgical availability, so hospitals are willing to pay surgeons a premium and engage high-priced locum tenens surgeons to fill vacancies in coverage. With increased supply comes an erosion of the numbers of cases performed by trainees and surgeons in practice. Caseloads may be inadequate to gain expertise and maintain skills. A quality initiative sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the American Pediatric Surgical Association will discourage underresourced community facilities and surgeons without specialty training from performing operations on children, mostly common conditions such as appendicitis. This will further increase demand for specialty-trained practitioners. Receiving less attention are considerations of value, the ratio of quality per dollar cost. Cost concerns, paramount among buyers of health care (businesses, insurance companies, and governmental health agencies), will prefer community hospitals that have lower cost structures than specialty children's facilities. Less recognized are the costs to families, who for a myriad of reasons would prefer closer alternatives. Cost considerations support providing pediatric surgical services in local facilities. Quality considerations may be addressed by a tiered system where top centers would care for conditions that require technical expertise and advanced modalities. Evidence indicates that pediatric surgeons already direct such cases to more specialized centers.

[Quality Management for Surgeons: The Knowledge of Basic Contexts and Innovative Strategies Promotes the Competitiveness of Clinical Department]. / Qualitätsmanagement für Chirurgen ­ Kenntnis grundlegender Zusammenhänge und innovativer Strategien fördert die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Fachabteilung.

Efficient quality management aiming to achieve high quality in patient care is crucial to the success of a surgery department. This requires the knowledge of relevant terms und contexts of quality management. Implementation remains difficult in the light of demographic change and skills shortage. If a hospital has an efficient internal quality management in place, this should be used as a supplementary instrument. Otherwise it is the (sole) task of a specialist department to ensure quality for patients, employees, and cooperative partners. This paper provides basic knowledge on quality management, risk management, and quality assurance in the context of relevant medical terms. It demonstrates new ways for implementation on the level of a surgery department, and introduces a new model of quality.