Corneal Guttae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report on the occurrence of corneal guttae after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 13 eyes of 13 patients who underwent DMEK at 2 tertiary referral centers between 2007 and 2021 (average available follow-up 73 ± 52 months, range 18-174 months) and showed corneal guttae during postoperative examinations were included. Eye bank images were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Occurrence of guttae was observed by specular microscopy in 13 eyes. In 11 cases, presence of guttae was confirmed by confocal microscopy and in 1 case by histology. Five eyes showed an increase in guttae density during the postoperative course. Surgery indications were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (n = 11), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 1), and DMEK graft failure after allograft rejection (n = 1); the latter eye had shown no signs of guttae after primary DMEK. Two eyes with guttae required a repeat DMEK due to graft failure. At the last available follow-up, all 11 remaining eyes had clear corneas and 10 eyes had a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥0.9 (decimal). During donor cornea processing in the eye bank, no guttae were observed on the donor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal guttae can occur after DMEK including in eyes operated for indications other than Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and most likely guttae were present on the donor graft but were not detectable by routine slit-lamp and light microscopy evaluation in the eye bank. Postoperative guttae density varies among patients and especially small isolated guttae do not seem to affect clinical outcomes.

Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (sequential DMEK) and DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (combined DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus. Comparative studies reporting sequential DMEK and combined DMEK in FECD patients were included. The main outcome measure of the study was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate and primary graft failure rate. Bias risk was assessed and a quality appraisal of the body of evidence was completed using the Cochrane Robin-I tool. A total of 667 eyes (5 studies) were included in this review, 292 eyes (43.77%) underwent a combined DMEK, while 375 (56.22%) eyes underwent a sequential DMEK surgery. We found no evidence of a difference between the two groups (mean difference, 95% CI) regarding: (1) CDVA improvement (-0.06; -0.14, 0.03 LogMAR; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86); (2) postoperative ECD (-62; -190, 67 cells/mm2 ; 4 studies, I2 : 67%; p = 0.35); (3) rebubbling (risks ratio: 1.04; 0.59, 1.85; 4 studies, I2 : 48%; p = 0.89); and primary graft failure rate (risks ratio: 0.91; 0.32, 2.57; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86). Of all the 5 non-randomized studies, all (100%) were graded as low quality. The overall quality of the analysed studies was low. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm no difference or superiority of one approach in terms of CDVA, endothelial cell count and postoperative complication rate between the two arms.

Long-Term Risk of Steroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension/Glaucoma With Topical Prednisolone Acetate 1% After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term risk of steroid-induced ocular hypertension and the need for glaucoma treatment with long-term use of topical prednisolone acetate 1% in patients without preexisting glaucoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 211 patients without previous glaucoma, who underwent Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and used topical prednisolone acetate long-term to prevent graft rejection. Dosing was 4 times daily for 4 months and tapered to once daily. The main outcomes were ocular hypertension (defined as intraocular pressure ≥24 mm Hg, or increase of ≥10 mm Hg over baseline) and initiation of glaucoma treatment. RESULTS: The median patient age was 70 years (range: 34-94 years). The indications for DSEK were Fuchs dystrophy (88%), pseudophakic corneal edema (7%), failed DSEK (3%), and failed penetrating keratoplasty (2%). The median follow-up period was 7 years (range, 1-17 years). At 1, 5, and 10 years, the cumulative risks of steroid-induced ocular hypertension were 29%, 41%, and 49%, respectively, and the risks of requiring glaucoma treatment were 11%, 17%, and 25%, respectively. Among 35 eyes treated for glaucoma, 28 (80%) were managed medically and 7 (20%) had filtration surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of potent topical corticosteroids, such as prednisolone acetate 1%, entails substantial risk of developing steroid-induced ocular hypertension, so frequent monitoring of intraocular pressure is required. With corneal transplantation, the risk can be mitigated by using techniques with a low inherent risk of rejection, such as Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, whenever possible, to allow earlier reduction of steroid potency.

Comparison of efficacy of three gases for anterior chamber tamponade in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of three different gases for intraocular tamponade: 100% air, 10% perfluoropropane (C3F8), and 10% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 138 patients who underwent DMEK were reviewed retrospectively, with the primary outcome being the rebubbling rate in the first week following surgery. Other clinical outcomes, such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), incidence of rebubbling after the first week, endothelial cell density (ECD), graft detachment, graft failure, pupillary block, and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 138 patients, 57 were in group 1 (treated with air), 44 in group 2 (treated with 10% C3F8), and 37 in group 3 (treated with 10% SF6). Group 3 showed significantly lower rates of graft detachment and rebubbling compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative BCVA among the groups. At one year, the mean endothelial cell loss was 32% in group 1, 30% in group 2, and 33% in group 3 (P=0.715). One patient in group 1 experienced pupillary block and increased IOP, while there were no such occurrences in the other groups. There was no difference between the groups in terms of graft failure. CONCLUSION: The use of 10% SF6 in DMEK surgery may be a good option due to its efficacy in preventing graft detachment, low rebubbling rate, and potential for minimizing complications.

Iatrogenic Descemet membrane detachment in the donor lenticule during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

A female patient in her 60s presented with an 8-month history of decreased vision in her right eye. She was diagnosed with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK), and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery was planned. Intraoperative Descemet membrane detachment (DMD) occurred while inserting the lenticule using the Sheets glide technique. The detachment of the Descemet membrane was detected immediately, and air descemetopexy was performed intraoperatively. Postoperatively, the donor lenticule was attached properly to the stromal bed, except for a focal DMD approximately 3 mm in the inferior part of the lenticule. A second descemetopexy was performed 5 days later, resulting in a complete attachment. A DMD in DSAEK lenticule is an extremely rare complication. Early detection and timely intervention with descemetopexy helped achieve a good anatomical and functional outcome.

Five-year clinical outcomes of 107 consecutive DMEK surgeries.

PURPOSE: The long-term clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and graft survival of Descemet-membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remain poorly understood. We retrospectively assessed these variables in all consecutive eyes that underwent DMEK for any indication in 2014-2018. The findings were compared to the long-term DMEK studies of five other groups (3-10-year follow-up). METHODS: Patients underwent ophthalmological tests preoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months, and then annually. Five-year graft survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimator. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial-cell density (ECD), and central-corneal thickness (CCT) at each timepoint was determined. RESULTS: 107 eyes (80 patients; 72 years old; 67% female) underwent first-time DMEK for uncomplicated Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (3%), and regraft after previous keratoplasty (3%). The most common complication was graft detachment requiring rebubbling (18%). Thirteen grafts (12%) failed at ≤15 months. Cumulative 5-year graft-survival probability was 88% (95% confidence intervals = 79-94%). BCVA improved from 0.6 logMAR preoperatively to 0.05 logMAR at 1 year (p<0.0001) and then remained stable. Donor ECD dropped by 47% at 6 postoperative months and then continued to decrease by 4.0%/year. Five-year endothelial-cell loss was 65% (from 2550 to 900 cells/mm2). CCT dropped from 618 to 551 µm at 5 years (p<0.0001). These findings are generally consistent with previous long-term DMEK studies. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK has low complication and high graft-survival rates and excellent clinical outcomes that persist up to 5 years post-surgery. DMEK seems to be a safe and effective treatment in the long term.

Immunohistochemical Findings in Retrocorneal Membranes of Eyes with Corneal Decompensation after Complicated Intraocular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Retrocorneal membranes (RCMs) may result from epithelial ingrowth, stromal keratocytic downgrowth, fibrous metaplasia of the corneal endothelium, or a combination of these processes. In an institutional case series, the clinical history, ocular findings, and immunohistochemical staining results of RCMs were analysed in patients with unilateral corneal decompensation after complicated intraocular surgery. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Between January 2021 and September 2022, six retrocorneal membranes were excised during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) procedures and classified after screening with haematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff, elastic van Gieson staining, and immunohistochemical screening with cytokeratin 7 (CK7), anti-cytokeratin (CAM5.2 and AE1/3), cell surface glycoprotein CD34, smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and vimentin. RESULTS: On the basis of the immunohistochemical screening, the majority of excised RCMs (5 of 6) could histopathologically be classified as membranes originating from fibrous metaplasia of the corneal endothelium. All these RCMs were positive for CK7, α-SMA, and vimentin and negative for CAM5.2 and CD34. In one patient, an RCM had developed after 18 days of corneal contact to a free-floating dexamethasone implant in the anterior chamber and was classified as originating from stromal keratocyte downgrowth (α-SMA- and vimentin-positive, all others negative). All eyes in this series had a previous history of complicated cataract surgery, partially with subsequent intraocular lens exchange. No eyes after previous penetrating keratoplasty were in this series. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of eyes with previous complicated intraocular interventions (in most cases cataract surgery and revisions), the dominating RCM belonged to the type originating from fibrous metaplasia of the corneal endothelium.

Double bubble pneumo-descemetopexy for the management of Descemet membrane detachment: An innovative technique.

A 62-year-old woman was referred with poor vision following manual small incision cataract surgery. On presentation, the uncorrected distance visual acuity in the involved eye was 3/60, whereas slit-lamp examination revealed a central corneal edema with the peripheral cornea relatively clear. Direct focal examination with a narrow slit upper border and lower margin of detached rolled up Descemet's membrane (DM) could be visualized. We performed a novel surgical approach, "double-bubble pneumo-descemetopexy." The surgical procedure included unrolling of DM with "small air bubble" and descemetopexy with "big bubble." No postoperative complications were observed, and best corrected distance visual acuity improved to 6/9 at 6 weeks. The patient had a clear cornea and maintained BCVA 6/9 during 18 months at follow-up. Double-bubble pneumo-descemetopexy, a more controlled technique, provides a satisfactory anatomical and visual outcome in DMD without the need for endothelial keratoplasty (Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty or DMEK) or penetrating keratoplasty.

Complications of Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty - A retrospective interventional study at a tertiary eye care center in Southern India.

Purpose: To analyze the visual outcome and complications of Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with their management in 256 eyes at a tertiary eye care center in southern India. Methods: This is a retrospective interventional study of 62 months duration conducted at a tertiary eye care center in southern India. Two hundred and fifty-six eyes of 205 patients were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent from the patients. All cases of DSEK were performed by a single experienced surgeon. In all cases, donor dissection was performed manually. A Sheet's glide was inserted through the temporal corneal incision and donor button was placed on the Sheet's glide with the endothelial side down. The lenticule was separated and inserted into the anterior chamber by pushing the lenticule into the anterior chamber using Sinskey's hook. Any complication, either intraoperative or postoperative, was recorded and managed either medically or by appropriate surgical means. Results: The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before surgery was CF-1 m, which improved to 6/18 after surgery. Intraoperative donor graft perforation during dissection was seen in 12 cases, thin lenticule in three eyes, and repeated artificial Anterior Chamber (AC) collapse in three eyes. Dislocation of lenticule was the most common complication seen in 21 eyes, which was managed by graft repositioning and rebubbling. Eleven cases had minimal separation of the graft and seven cases had interface haze. Pupillary block glaucoma was seen in two cases that resolved with partial release of bubble. Surface infiltrate was seen in two cases, which was managed with topical antimicrobial agents. Primary graft failure was seen in two cases. Conclusion: DSEK is a promising alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for corneal endothelial decompensation, but it also has its own merits and limitations, and most often, merits overweigh limitations.

Refractive outcomes after DMEK: meta-analysis.

In this meta-analysis and systematic literature review of refractive outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), the extent of the refractive shift and an overview of reasons for refractive shift after DMEK are provided. The PubMed library was screened for articles containing the terms "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty," "DMEK," "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery," "triple-DMEK" combined with "refractive outcomes," "refractive shift," and "hyperopic shift." The refractive outcomes after DMEK were analyzed and compared using a fixed and random effects model. The overall mean change of the spherical equivalent outcome when compared with the preoperative value in cases of DMEK or when compared with the preoperative target refraction in cases of DMEK combined with cataract surgery was +0.43 diopters (D) (95% CI, 0.31-0.55). When DMEK is combined with cataract surgery, a target refraction of -0.5 D is recommended to achieve emmetropia. Changes in the posterior corneal curvature are identified as the main cause of the refractive hyperopic shift.

Glaucoma-Related Risk Factors for Endothelial Cell Loss and Graft Failure After Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PRCIS: Previous trabeculectomy and medical or surgical glaucoma treatment after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) were significantly associated with endothelial cell loss and graft failure. The pupillary block was a significant risk factor for graft failure. PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term risk factors associated with postoperative endothelial cell loss and graft failure after DSAEK in Japanese eyes, with special attention to glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 117 eyes of 110 consecutive patients with bullous keratopathy who had undergone DSAEK. The patients were classified into 4 groups: (1) no glaucoma group (n = 23 eyes), (2) primary angle closure disease group (n = 32 eyes), (3) glaucoma group that had previously undergone trabeculectomy (n = 44 eyes) (glaucoma with bleb), and (4) glaucoma group that had not previously undergone trabeculectomy (n = 18 eyes) (glaucoma without bleb). RESULTS: The cumulative 5-year graft survival rate was 82.1%. The cumulative 5-year graft survival rate among the 4 groups is as follows: no glaucoma (73%), primary angle closure disease (100%), glaucoma with bleb (39%), and glaucoma without bleb (80%). Multivariate analysis revealed that additional glaucoma medication and glaucoma surgery after DSAEK were independent risk factors for endothelial cell loss. Conversely, glaucoma with blebs and pupillary block were independent risk factors for graft failure after DSAEK. CONCLUSION: Previous trabeculectomy and medical or surgical glaucoma treatment after DSAEK were significantly associated with endothelial cell loss and graft failure. Pupillary block was a significant risk factor for graft failure.

[On the issue of separate designation of the pre-Descemet's layer in the structure of the cornea]. / K voprosu o vydelenii predestsemetovogo sloya v strukture rogovitsy.

Selective exchange of pathologically altered retinal layers is currently considered the most practical approach in corneal transplantation. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are often performed as pathogenetically substantiated transplantation methods. The technique and the course of surgery, possible complications, and achieved outcomes, among other things, depend largely on the pre-Descemet's layer, which was described more than 10 years ago by several ophthalmologists in varying detail. In view of this, the main issue discussed in literature is the following: is the pre-Descemet's layer (Dua's layer) a separate (new) layer of the cornea, or is it an integral part of the stroma (the Feizi stroma)? This article continues the discussion on «separate designation of the pre-Descemet's layer in the structure of the cornea¼ and presents the view of the authors on this problem based on own experience, literature data, anatomical subdisciplines, as well as specific aspects of ophthalmological terminology, and with the use of extrapolation and analogies.

Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK).

This study, a case series of 2 patients and a literature review, aims to describe the second and third known cases of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. The suprachoroidal hemorrhage is defined as the presence of blood in the suprachoroidal space; final visual acuity is rarely greater than 0.1 (decimal scale). Both cases presented had known risk factors: high myopia, previous ocular surgeries, arterial hypertension, and being under anticoagulant therapy. The diagnosis of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage was made at the 24-h follow-up visit, as they recalled a sudden and tremendous acute pain hours after surgery. Both cases were drained through a scleral approach. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage is a rare but devastating consequence that can occur after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Awareness of the most critical risk factors allows for early identification, which is of paramount importance for the prognosis of these patients.

Combined Temporary Pupilloplasty and DSEK in an Eye With a Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lens to Prevent Opacification: A Case Report.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe a case of temporary pupilloplasty during Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty to prevent opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: A 60-year-old man presented with corneal edema in the left eye after a traumatic cataract removal and scleral suture fixation of a hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Akreos, Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ). Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty with temporary pupilloplasty was performed. The pupilloplasty was lysed with neodymium:YAG laser on postoperative day 5 after the air bubble was no longer present. RESULTS: At 1 year after surgery, the patient did not develop IOL opacification despite the intracameral air used during the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Opacification of hydrophilic acrylic lenses is a visually significant complication of intracameral gas from endothelial keratoplasty. Our case demonstrates the potential to prevent IOL opacification in a patient with a hydrophilic acrylic IOL by using temporary pupilloplasty.

Outcomes of cystoid macular edema following Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in a referral center for keratoplasty in Spain: retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of eyes with visually significant cystoid macular œdema (vs-CMO) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a referral center for keratoplasty in Spain. We conducted a retrospective, single-surgeon case series of eyes that developed post-DMEK vs-CMO performed between January 2011 and December 2020. Data collected included: indication for DMEK; biometric data; ocular comorbidities; past medical history; time to detection of vs-CMO after DMEK (T, weeks); best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT, µm) at diagnosis of vs-CMO, after resolution of CMO, and at last follow-up; and management strategy. Main outcomes analyzed were incidence of vs-CMO, improvement in BCVA and CRT after treatment of vs-CMO. Of 291 consecutive DMEK surgeries, 14 eyes of 13 patients (4.8%) developed vs-CMO. Five patients (38.5%) had history of CMO, and 28.6% of eyes had ophthalmic comorbidities. Median (P25-P75) T was 4 (3-10) weeks. Treatment success was observed in 12/13 eyes (92.3%), two of which required second-line treatment. In successful cases (median time-to-resolution 3.0 (2.0-3.5) months), median BCVA improved from 0.60 (0.40-0.80) logMAR to 0.30 (0.15-0.40) logMAR (p = 0.002) after treatment, and median CRT improved from 582.5 (400.0-655.0) µm to 278.0 (258.0-294.0) µm (p = 0.005). In our study, we found a 4.8% rate of post-DMEK vs-CMO, with most cases occurring in the first 3 months after surgery. Good functional and anatomical outcomes are expected in most eyes, without treatment-related complications or implications in graft outcomes. Additional studies are encouraged to determine a standardized protocol for post-DMEK vs-CMO.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachments in superior versus temporal approach.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment rate comparing superior versus temporal main incision approach. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study on patients who underwent DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy with main wound incision performed at either 90° in the superior approach, or at 180°/0° in the temporal approach. All main incisions were secured with a single 10-0 nylon suture at the end of surgery. Data collected were donor age and gender, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and gender, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, re-bubbling rate, air fill in the anterior chamber (AC) at day one and intra- and early postoperative complications. RESULTS: 187 eyes were included in the study. 99 eyes had DMEK surgery with superior approach, while 88 eyes had temporal approach. The two groups had no differences in donor age and sex, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and sex, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, and air fill in the anterior chamber at day one. Re-bubbling rate was 38.4% for surgeries performed with superior access and 29.5% for those with temporal access(p = 0.186). After exclusion of patients with intraoperative and/or postoperative complication, the difference in re-bubbling rate was higher, although non-significant (37.5% and 25% for superior and temporal approach respectively, p = 0.098). CONCLUSION: The temporal approach in DMEK showed a trend towards a clinically significant lower rate of post-operative re-bubbling compared to the superior approach, however, no statistically significant difference was noted comparing the two approaches, which both remain feasible options in DMEK surgery.

Interface Fluid Syndrome After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With History of LASIK.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual, pachymetric, tomographic, and biomicroscopic findings in a series of cases with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap interface fluid syndrome (IFS) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Six cases were included in this study; all patients had a history of LASIK and underwent DMEK for the treatment of bullous keratopathy. After uneventful surgery, all patients presented with corneal edema and IFS under the LASIK flap, which was demonstrated with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Visual acuity, clinical findings, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and AS-OCT were documented during the management of these cases. RESULTS: IFS appears 2.33 days (±1.03) after DMEK. One case improved with conservative treatment. In 5 cases, the LASIK flap was lifted, the fluid was drained, and the flap was replaced. The mean best-corrected visual acuity after fluid drainage was 0.44 logMAR (range 0.18-1.0) and mean central corneal thickness was 538 µm ± 160. Total resolution of the IFS was achieved at 14.5 days (range 4-30) after DMEK. AS-OCT showed resolution of the flap interface in 5 of 6 cases, while 1 patient required second DMEK due to reaccumulation of the interface fluid. CONCLUSIONS: IFS can occur after DMEK in patients with previous LASIK. AS-OCT is a valuable tool for monitoring these cases preoperatively and postoperatively. Early surgical management is often needed to achieve resolution.

Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultrathin - Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the treatment of corneal endothelial failure in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) or Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis and conducted a literature search in PubMed and Cochrane Library, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Effects were calculated as odds ratios or standardized mean differences. RESULTS: A total of six studies with 300 eyes in total (151 UT-DSAE and 149 DMEK) were included. BSCVA was superior in the DMEK group compared with the UT-DSAEK at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Rebubbling rates and overall adverse events were 2.37 and 1.48 times, respectively, higher in the DMEK group. The central corneal thickness and spherical equivalent were significantly lower in the DMEK group 12 months post-surgery. Endothelial cell density values were similar in both groups up to 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis comparing UT-DSAEK with DMEK. DMEK surgery resulted in significantly better BSCVA at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared to UT-DSAEK. UT-DSAEK had a better complication profile with lower rebubbling rates.

Rebubbling and graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using a standardised protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse risk factors and long-term outcomes after rebubbling and graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: 176 consecutive DMEK grafts of 125 patients performed by 8 surgeons with a standardised technique between January 2015 and July 2022 were analysed. Main outcome measures were graft detachments, rebubbling rate, postoperative outcomes, and risk factors for graft failure and rebubbling. RESULTS: 6 (3.4%) grafts required rebubbling (>1/3 area detached). 40 (22.7%) grafts developed self-resolving partial detachments (<1/3 area detached). The mean time to rebubble was 16 ± 9.4 days. Mean BSCVAs at 5 years postoperative were 0.03 ± 0.16, 0.03 ± 0.14, and 0.15 ± 0.31 logMAR in fully attached, partially detached and rebubbled grafts (P = 0.437). 5-year graft survival were 98%, 90%, and 83% in fully attached, partially detached and rebubbled eyes (P = 0.02). There was significantly greater endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the rebubbled eyes (P = 0.018). Intraoperative trauma was a risk factor for graft failure (HR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.50; P = 0.023). An indication for surgery other than Fuchs endothelial dystrophy was a risk factor for rebubbling (HR 5.28; 95% CI: 5.11-72.4; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: DMEK grafts had better graft survival if there was no partial detachment or rebubbling at 5 years postop. There was significant ECL associated with rebubbling. A standardised technique reduces rebubbling and graft failure risk.

Incidence and risk factors for glaucoma development and progression after corneal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cumulative incidence and risk factors for glaucoma development and progression within 1-2 years following corneal transplant surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Boston keratoprosthesis type I (KPro) implantation, or endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK or DMEK) under previous PK (EK under previous PK) at one academic institution with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. Primary outcome measures were cumulative incidence of glaucoma development and progression after corneal transplant, in patients without and with preoperative glaucoma, respectively. Risk factors for glaucoma development and progression were also assessed. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-one eyes of 431 patients undergoing PK (113), DALK (17), DSEK (71), DMEK (168), KPro (35) and EK under previous PK (27) with a mean follow-up of 22.9 months were analyzed. The 1-year cumulative incidence for glaucoma development and progression was 28.0% and 17.8% in patients without and with preoperative glaucoma, respectively. In a Cox proportional hazards analysis, DSEK surgery, KPro implantation, average intraocular pressure (IOP) through follow-up and postoperative IOP spikes of ≥30 mmHg were each independently associated with glaucoma development or progression (p < 0.04 for all). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients developed glaucoma or exhibited glaucoma progression within 1 year after corneal transplantation. Patient selection for DSEK may partly explain the higher risk for glaucoma in these patients. Postoperative IOP spikes should be minimized and may indicate the need for co-management with a glaucoma specialist.