Reloadable Stapler Use during Peripartum Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Novel Surgical Technique and Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe a novel surgical technique for the management of antenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, case series of patients with suspected PAS undergoing peripartum hysterectomy with a reloadable articulating stapler at a tertiary care center. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with antenatally suspected PAS were identified and underwent peripartum hysterectomy with the aid of a reloadable stapler. Mean gestational age at delivery was 344/7 ± 11/7 weeks. Mean total operative time (skin-to-skin) was 117.3 ± 39.3 minutes, and 79.8 ± 19.8 minutes for the hysterectomy. Mean blood loss for the entire case was 1,809 ± 868 mL. Mean blood loss for the hysterectomy was 431 ± 421 mL. Mean units of intraoperative red blood cells transfused was 3 ± 1 units. Mean units of postoperative red blood cells transfused was 1 ± 0.5 units. Five cases were complicated by urological injury (two intentional cystotomies). Four patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for a mean of ≤24 hours. Mean postoperative LOS was 4.11 ± 1.45 days. Three patients had final pathology that did not demonstrate PAS while four were consistent with accreta, six increta, and five percreta. CONCLUSION: Use of a reloadable articulating stapler device as part of the surgical management of antenatally suspected PAS results in a shorter operative time (117 ± 39 minutes vs. 140-254 minutes previously reported), lower average blood loss (1,809 ± 868 mL vs. 2,500-5,000 mL previously reported) and shorter LOS (4.11 ± 1.45 days vs. 9.8 ± 13.5 days previously reported) compared with traditional cesarean hysterectomy. The reloadable stapling device offers an advantage of more rapidly achieving hemostasis in the surgical management of PAS. KEY POINTS: · PAS is associated with severe maternal morbidity.. · Decreased operative time and blood loss have many clinical benefits.. · Reloadable stapler use for PAS decreases operative time.. · Reloadable stapler use for PAS decreases operative blood loss..

Needle in the heart: a rare case of cardiac tamponade caused by a migrated foreign body and mimicking ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial tamponade is a serious condition which may eventually lead to severe haemodynamic disturbances and cardiac arrest. It is most often caused by the accumulation of fluid inside the pericardium, as a result of different aetiological factors such as pericarditis, neoplastic diseases, lymphatic dysfunctions, or idiopathic pericardial disease. Pericardial tamponade can develop after cardiac surgical procedures or as a complication of myocardial infarction. Collection of blood inside the pericardial sack can be the result of pericardial or cardiac trauma. It is exceedingly rare for the injury to be caused by a migrating foreign body. Although a typical picture of pericardial tamponade has been previously described, the disorder may clinically resemble an acute myocardial infarction. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 58-year-old female patient complaining of new onset thoracic pain and shortness of breath. Electrocardiographic examination results were suggestive of an acute inferior myocardial infarction. However, echocardiography revealed significant pericardial tamponade. The cause was found to be a needle which remained inside the pelvis following a previous cesarean delivery, which the patient had undergone 18 years prior. In emergency setting, the needle was removed and the pericardial tamponade was resolved. Due to the prompt and efficient management, the patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and presented no recurrence at the follow-up examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The migration of foreign bodies through tissues is exceedingly rare. If present, it may cause life-threatening complications. Since the aetiology of pericardial tamponade is vast, a thorough assessment is highly important. Therefore, echocardiography is the imaging modality of choice. We wish to highlight the possibility of migrating foreign bodies as probable cause for pericardial tamponade, as well as the importance of echocardiographic methods in the fast-track evaluation of such critical conditions.

Effectiveness of the fetal pillow to prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes at full dilatation cesarean section in routine practice.

INTRODUCTION: The fetal pillow has been suggested to reduce maternal trauma and fetal adverse outcomes when used to disimpact the fetal head at full dilatation cesarean section. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the use of the fetal pillow device at full dilatation cesarean section between September 2014 and March 2018 at Liverpool Women's Hospital, a large UK teaching hospital. RESULTS: There were 471 cases of full dilatation cesarean section during the study period and 391 were included for the analysis; 170 used the fetal pillow and 221 were delivered without. We did not demonstrate any benefit in the significant maternal outcomes of estimated blood loss >1000 mL or >1500 mL, need for blood transfusion, or duration of hospital stay, from the use of the fetal pillow. We did not demonstrate any improvement in fetal outcome following use of the fetal pillow for arterial pH <7.1, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or admission to the neonatal unit. For deliveries undertaken at or below the level of the ischial spines there was likewise no benefit from fetal pillow use, except in a reduced risk of an arterial pH <7.1 (relative risk 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, P = .01); however, admission to the neonatal unit was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date on the use of the fetal pillow at full dilatation cesarean section. We did not demonstrate any statistically significant benefit from the use of the fetal pillow to prevent any maternal or fetal adverse outcomes at full dilatation cesarean section in routine clinical use. Further randomized studies are required to prove clinical benefit from this device before more widespread use.

Scalpel versus diathermy skin incision in Caesarean section.

Surgical scalpels are traditionally used for skin incisions during a Caesarean delivery; the great evolutions in electrosurgical devices bring an alternative method for skin incision by the usage of cutting diathermy. This was a prospective randomised comparative study conducted during the period from March 2016 to February 2017 on 200 patients, 100 patients had skin incisions using the surgical scalpel, while 100 patients had skin incisions with a diathermy, in order to judge the variations in the postoperative pain, the incision time, the incision blood loss, the operative time, the wound healing and the wound complications. We observed a significant difference between the two groups regarding the incision time (p < .001), incisional blood loss (p < .001), operative time (p < .001) and the postoperative pain (p < .001), where these parameters were less in the diathermy group. No significant difference observed between the two groups regarding the wound healing (p = .389) and wound complications (p = .470). We can conclude that the proper usage of diathermy in making the skin incision during a Caesarean section in this study achieved better results than the scalpel incision. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Surgical scalpels are traditionally used in making the skin incisions during a Caesarean section; diathermy incisions, on the contrary, are less popular among the surgeons. It has been hypothesised that the application of extreme heat may result in a significant postoperative pain and poor wound healing. There has been a widespread use of diathermy for hemostasis but fear of production of large scars and improper tissue healing has restricted their usage in making skin incisions. What do the results of this study add? The use of diathermy for skin incisions in Caesarean section in this study was associated with a reduced incisional blood loss, incisional time, operative time and postoperative pain. It had no effect on wound closure and was not associated with any delay in wound healing. Also, the wound complications rate was equal in both types of incisions. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Most surgeons prefer the scalpel in making skin incision during a Caesarean section due to the fear of surgical site infection. Our findings proved different, we proved that cutting diathermy could be accepted as an alternative technique for making a skin incision without increased rates of wound infections. Also, the advantages of cutting diathermy will give benefits to both the patients and the surgeons.

The use of O-ring retractors at Caesarean section : A systematic review and meta analysis.

O-ring retractors (Alexis/Mobius) have been shown to reduce the risk of Surgical site infection (SSI) following general abdominal surgery. The benefit at caesarean section (CS) remains to be established given the relatively high cost. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of O-ring retractors when used at CS. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from inception of each database until January 2018. No language restrictions were applied. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the use of an O-ring retractor to routine care at CS were included. Primary outcome was SSI. Secondary outcomes were operating time, estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusion, need to exteriorise the uterus, requirement for additional postoperative analgesia and adequate operative field visualisation. Analysis was performed using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: 6 RCTs were included in the qualitative synthesis and the meta-analysis. This included 1669 women. The use of O-ring retractors did not reduce the risk of SSI when used at CS RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.34-1.70). Nor did the use of O-ring retractors reduce the operating time, estimated blood loss, the need for blood transfusion or the need for additional postoperative analgesia. The use O-ring retractors did reduce the need for exteriorisation of the uterus RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.33-0.69), and did increase the rate of adequate visualisation of the operative field RR 1.05 (95% CI 1.00-1.10). In a planned subgroup analysis there was a reduction in the rate of SSI with the use of O-ring retractors in women with a BMI < 35 RR 0.34(95% CI 0.12-0.98). CONCLUSION: This review has shown that O-ring retractors do not reduce the incidence of the common measurable complications of CS; SSI, blood loss, need for blood transfusion and need for additional postoperative analgesia. There may be a subgroup where these retractors are useful, but present evidence does not justify their routine use at CS.

Effect of table tilt and spine flexion-rotation on the acoustic window of the lumbar spine in pregnant women / Efeito da inclinação da mesa e flexão da coluna sobre a janela acústica da coluna lombar em mulheres grávidas

Abstract Study objective: The purpose of this study was to assess whether application of dorsal table tilt and body rotation to a parturient seated for neuraxial anesthesia increased the size of the paramedian target area for neuraxial needle insertion. Setting: Labor and Delivery Room. Patients: Thirty term pregnant women, ASA I-II, scheduled for an elective C-section delivery. Interventions: Lumbar ultrasonography was performed in four seated positions: (F) lumbar flexion; (FR) as in position F with right shoulder rotation; (FT) as in position F with dorsal table-tilt; (FTR) as in position F with dorsal table-tilt combined with right shoulder rotation. Measurements: For each position, the size of the 'target area', defined as the visible length of the posterior longitudinal ligament was measured at the L3-L4 interspace. Main results: The mean posterior longitudinal ligament was 18.4 ± 4 mm in position F, 18.9 ± 5.5 mm in FR, 19 ± 5.3 mm in FT, and 18 ± 5.2 mm in FTR. Mean posterior longitudinal ligament length was not significantly different in the four positions. Conclusions: These data show that the positions studied did not increase the target area as defined by the length of the posterior longitudinal ligament for the purpose of neuraxial needle insertion in obstetric patients. The maneuvers studied will have limited use in improving spinal needle access in pregnant women.

Resumo Objetivo do estudo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar se a inclinação lateral da mesa cirúrgica e a rotação do corpo de uma parturiente sentada para anestesia neuraxial aumentou o tamanho da área-alvo paramediana para a inserção da agulha neuraxial. Ambiente: Sala de parto. Pacientes: Trinta grávidas a termo, ASA I-II, agendadas para cesárea eletiva. Intervenções: Ultrassonografia lombar foi feita em quatro posições sentadas: (F) flexão lombar; (FR) como na posição F com rotação do ombro direito; (FT) como na posição F com inclinação lateral da mesa cirúrgica; (FTR) como na posição F com inclinação lateral da mesa cirúrgica combinada com a rotação do ombro direito. Mensurações: Para cada posição, o tamanho da "área-alvo", definido como o comprimento visível do ligamento longitudinal posterior, foi medido no interespaço de L3-L4. Principais resultados: As médias do ligamento longitudinal posterior foram: 18,4 ± 4 mm na posição F; 18,9 ± 5,5 mm na posição FR; 19 ± 5,3 mm na posição FT e 18 ± 5,2 mm na posição FTR. O comprimento médio do ligamento longitudinal posterior não foi significativamente diferente nas quatro posições. Conclusões: Esses dados mostram que as posições avaliadas não aumentaram a área-alvo, conforme definido pelo comprimento do ligamento longitudinal posterior com o objetivo de inserção da agulha neuraxial em pacientes obstétricas. As manobras avaliadas terão um uso limitado na melhoria do acesso à agulha espinhal em mulheres grávidas.

A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of retractors at caesarean delivery.

The aim of this study was to determine if the use of a self-retaining, symmetrical retractor (OB/Mobius®) during caesarean delivery is associated with differences in post-operative pain experience. Consenting women undergoing caesarean delivery were randomly assigned to OB/Mobius® versus conventional retraction instruments. Women were blinded to retractor type and filled out surgical pain surveys each post-operative day. Additional outcome variables were collected through a provider survey and chart review. Of the 154 randomised women, 144 completed the study. There was no difference in the symmetry, quality or intensity of postoperative pain based on the method of retraction. The OB/Mobius® retractor did not confer an improvement in the quality or intensity of post-caesarean discomfort in the first three days following delivery. Nor did the groups differ in operative times, blood loss or pain medication usage. However, the retractor may offer improved visualisation and retraction in obese women. Impact statement Use of a plastic sheath self-retaining retractor has been minimally studied in caesarean deliveries. Recently it was found that the use of such a retractor reduced wound infection, but another study in obese women did not show improved rates of infection (Hinkson et al. 2016 ; Scolari Childress et al. 2016 ). The study of sheath self-retaining retractors to decrease post-operative pain has not been reported previously. This study offers an investigation into a generalisable population of parturients who undergo caesarean delivery and if the primary use of a self-retaining retractor versus sole use of traditional hand-held retractors decreased post-operative pain while in the hospital. Although this study did not show an improvement in post-operative pain, provider experience reports demonstrated some improvement in visualisation, particularly in the obese population with the use of this novel retractor, thus making it an option for providers who do caesarean deliveries without an assistant and find hand-held retractors inadequate.

Does Preprocedural Ultrasound Increase the First-Pass Success Rate of Epidural Catheterization Before Cesarean Delivery? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Preprocedural ultrasound may improve the efficacy and safety of epidural catheterization, especially in difficult cases. Most studies of ultrasound-assisted epidural catheterization in the obstetric population are dated and nonblinded with inconsistent designs. This double-blind, randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-assisted with the conventional palpation techniques for epidural catheterization in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. We hypothesized that the use of preprocedural ultrasound would increase the success rate of epidural catheterization at the first needle pass. METHODS: Eligible subjects were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II parturients with full-term singleton pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean delivery using double-interspace combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Exclusion criteria were age <19 or >40 years, body mass index ≥35 kg/m, women presenting in labor or having any contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia, marked spinal deformity, previous spinal surgery, or impalpable anatomical landmarks. One hundred ten patients were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups (palpation and ultrasound groups). All procedures were performed by a single experienced anesthesiologist. Patients and investigators assessing the outcome data were blinded to group allocation. A systematic spinal ultrasound assessment and a sham procedure were performed in the ultrasound and palpation groups, respectively, before attempting epidural catheterization. The primary outcome was the rate of successful epidural catheterization at the first needle pass. Secondary outcomes were the rate of successful epidural catheterization at the first skin puncture, number of performed needle passes and skin punctures, duration of the epidural procedure, patient satisfaction from the procedure, and complications of the procedure (incidence of unintentional dural and vascular punctures, failed block, unilateral or patchy block, and backache). RESULTS: Data from 108 patients (55 patients in the palpation group and 53 patients in the ultrasound group) were analyzed. The rate of successful epidural catheterization at the first needle pass was 60% in the palpation group and 58.5% in the ultrasound group (95% confidence interval of the difference in proportions between groups is -18.5% to 21.6%; P > 0.99). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the success rate at the first skin puncture, the number of needle passes and skin punctures, or patient satisfaction. The median (range) duration of the epidural procedure was 185 (57-680) seconds in the ultrasound group and 215 (114-720) seconds in the palpation group (P = 0.036 with the Mann-Whitney U test and P = 0.083 with the Student t test with unequal variances). The overall rate of complications of the procedure was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: For experienced anesthesiologists, it remains unclear whether preprocedural ultrasound improves the epidural catheterization technique in parturients with palpable anatomical landmarks undergoing cesarean delivery.

Surgical site infection in cesarean sections with the use of a plastic sheath wound retractor compared to the traditional self-retaining metal retractor.

OBJECTIVE: A cesarean section rate of up to 19.4% is reported worldwide. Surgical site infection occurs with rates of up to 13.5%. Plastic-sheath wound retractors show reduced rates of surgical site infections in abdominal surgery. There is limited evidence in women having cesarean sections. This study evaluates the use of the Alexis(®) O C-Section Retractor in the prevention of surgical site infection in patients undergoing their first planned cesarean section compared to the traditional Collins self-retaining metal retractor. STUDY DESIGN: A single center, prospective, randomized, controlled, observational trial. The primary outcome is surgical site infection as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The secondary outcomes included intraoperative surgical parameters, postoperative pain scores and the short and long-term satisfaction with wound healing. From October 2013 to December 2015 at the Charité University Hospital, Berlin. 98 patients to the Alexis(®) O C-Section Retractor group and 100 to the traditional Collins self-retaining metal retractor group. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in the rate of surgical site infections, when the Alexis(®) O C-Section Retractor was used for wound retraction compared to the traditional Collins metal self-retaining wound retractor, 1% vs. 8% (RR 7.84, 95% CI (2.45-70.71) p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The use of plastic-sheath wound retractors compared to the traditional self-retaining metal retractor in low risk women, having the first cesarean section is associated with a significantly reduced risk of surgical site infection.

Near-infrared spectrometry in pregnancy: progress and perspectives, a review of literature.

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) allows continuous noninvasive monitoring of in vivo oxygenation in selected tissues. It has been used primarily as a research tool for several years, but it is seeing wider application in the clinical arena all over the world. It was recently used to monitor brain circulation in cardiac surgery, carotid endarteriectomy, neurosurgery and robotic surgery. According to the few studies used NIRS in pregnancy, it may be helpful to assess the impact of severe forms of preeclampsia on brain circulation, to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments. It may also be used during cesarean section to detect earlier sudden complications. The evaluation of placental function via abdominal maternal approach to detect fetal growth restriction is a new field of application of NIRS.

A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an important cause of morbidity following cesarean delivery, particularly in obese patients. Methods to reduce SSIs after cesarean delivery would have an important impact in obese obstetric patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Alexis O cesarean delivery retractor, a barrier self-retaining retractor, reduces SSIs and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial of obese women (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) undergoing nonemergent cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized to the treatment group (using the Alexis O cesarean delivery retractor) or to the control group (using conventional handheld retractors). The primary outcome was SSI or wound disruption during the 30 day postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, change in hemoglobin, antiemetic use, length of postoperative hospital stay, hospital readmission, and other postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients were enrolled in the study. One hundred forty-four patients were randomized to the treatment group and 157 to the control group. Baseline characteristics and indications for cesarean delivery were similar between the 2 groups. Median body mass index was 40.1 kg/m(2). There were no significant differences between the treatment and the control group in the primary outcome of SSI or wound disruption rates at the 30 day assessment (20.6% vs 17.6%, P = .62), during the postoperative inpatient hospitalization or at the 1-2 week postoperative visit. There were also no differences in the primary outcome when adjusting for obesity class or thickness of the subcuticular layer. Patients in the treatment group had lower rates of uterine exteriorization (54.3% vs 87.3%, P < .001), but there were no differences in all other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Use of the Alexis retractor in cesarean delivery deliveries did not decrease SSI or wound disruption rates in an obese population. Its use as a retractor should be left to the discretion of the surgeon and clinical circumstances.

Comparison of metaraminol, phenylephrine and ephedrine in prophylaxis and treatment of hypotension in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia / Avaliação comparativa entre metaraminol, fenilefrina e efedrina na profilaxia e no tratamento da hipotensão em cesarianas sob raquianestesia / Evaluación comparativa entre el metaraminol, la fenilefrina y la efedrina en la profilaxis y en el tratamiento de la hipotensión en cesáreas bajo anestesia espinal

Maternal hypotension is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, with deleterious effects on the fetus and mother. Among the strategies aimed at minimizing the effects of hypotension, vasopressor administration is the most efficient. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine, metaraminol, and ephedrine in the prevention and treatment of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Ninety pregnant women, not in labor, undergoing cesarean section were randomized into three groups to receive a bolus followed by continuous infusion of vasopressor as follows: phenylephrine group (50 μg + 50 μg/min); metaraminol group (0.25 mg + 0.25 mg/min); ephedrine group (4 mg + 4 mg/min). Infusion dose was doubled when systolic blood pressure decreased to 80% of baseline and a bolus was given when systolic blood pressure decreased below 80%. The infusion dose was divided in half when systolic blood pressure increased to 120% and was stopped when it became higher. The incidence of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, reactive hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, Apgar scores, and arterial cord blood gases were assessed at the 1st and 5th minutes. There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, reactive hypertension, infusion discontinuation, atropine administration or Apgar scores. Rescue boluses were higher only in the ephedrine group compared to metaraminol group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting and fetal acidosis were greater in the ephedrine group. The three drugs were effective in preventing hypotension; however, fetal effects were more frequent in the ephedrine group, although transient.

Hipotensão materna é uma complicação comum após raquianestesia em cirurgia cesariana, trazendo efeitos deletérios para o feto e a mãe. Entre as estratégias com o objetivo de minimizar os efeitos da hipotensão, a administração de vasopressores é a mais eficiente. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia da fenilefrina, metaraminol e efedrina na prevenção e tratamento de hipotensão após raquianestesia em cirurgia cesariana. Noventa gestantes que não estavam em trabalho de parto submetidas à cesariana eletiva foram randomizadas em três grupos para receber um bolus, seguido de infusão contínua de vasopressor da seguinte forma: Grupo Fenilefrina (50 μg + 50 μg/min); Grupo Metaraminol (0,25 mg + 0,25 mg/min); Grupo Efedrina (4 mg + 4 mg/min). A dose da infusão foi dobrada quando a pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) decresceu até 80% dos valores basais e um bolus foi dado quando a PAS decresceu para valores abaixo de 80%. A dose da infusão foi dividida ao meio quando a PAS aumentou até 120% e foi interrompida quando mais elevada. Foram analisadas as incidências de hipotensão, náuseas e vômitos, hipertensão reativa, bradicardia, taquicardia e escores de Apgar no primeiro e quinto minutos e gases de sangue arterial do cordão umbilical. Não houve diferenças nas incidências de hipotensão, bradicardia, hipertensão reativa, interrupção da infusão, administração de atropina ou escores de Apgar. A administração de bolus de resgate foram superiores apenas no Grupo Efedrina em comparação com Metaraminol. A incidência de náuseas e vômitos e acidose fetal foram superiores no Grupo Efedrina. Os três fármacos foram eficazes na prevenção de hipotensão, mas repercussões fetais foram mais frequentes no Grupo Efedrina, embora transitórias.

La hipotensión materna es una complicación común posterior a la anestesia espinal en cirugía de cesárea, lo que trae efectos perjudiciales para el feto y la madre. Entre las estrategias cuyo objetivo es minimizar los efectos de la hipotensión, la administración de vasopresores es la más eficaz. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la eficacia de la fenilefrina, del metaraminol y de la efedrina en la prevención y el tratamiento de la hipotensión posterior a la aplicación de la anestesia espinal en cirugía de cesárea. Noventa gestantes que no estaban de parto y sometidas a la cesárea electiva, fueron aleatorizadas en 3 grupos para recibir un bolo, seguido de infusión continua de vasopresor de la siguiente forma: grupo fenilefrina (50 μg + 50 μg/min); grupo metaraminol (0,25 mg + 0,25 mg/min); grupo efedrina (4 mg + 4 mg/min). La dosis de la infusión se duplicó cuando la presión arterial sistólica cayó al 80% de los valores basales y un bolo se administró cuando la presión arterial sistólica cayó a valores por debajo del 80%. La dosis de la infusión se dividió en 2 cuando la presión arterial sistólica aumentó alcanzando los 120% y fue interrumpida cuando se elevó. Se analizaron las incidencias de hipotensión, náuseas y vómitos, hipertensión reactiva, bradicardia, taquicardia y puntuaciones de Apgar en el primer y en el quinto minutos, y gases de sangre arterial del cordón umbilical. No hubo diferencias en las incidencias de hipotensión, bradicardia, hipertensión reactiva, interrupción de la infusión, administración de atropina o puntuaciones de Apgar. La administración de bolos de rescate fue superior solo en el grupo efedrina en comparación con el metaraminol. La incidencia de náuseas y vómitos y la acidosis fetal fueron superiores en el grupo efedrina. Los 3 fármacos fueron eficaces en la prevención de la hipotensión y las repercusiones fetales fueron más frecuentes en el grupo efedrina, aunque hayan sido transitorias.

Anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant woman with Guillain Barré syndrome: a case report / Anestesia para cesariana em gestante com síndrome de Guillain Barré: relato de caso / Anestesia para cesárea en gestante con síndrome de Guillain Barré: relato de caso

Background and objectives: Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS) is an autoimmune neurological disease characterized by an acute or subacute demyelinating polyradiculoneuritis. It is an unusual event during pregnancy and a challenge for the anesthesiologist, due to the possibility of impairment of neuromuscular function and occurrence of respiratory complications in the post-operative period. The objective of this paper is to discuss the anesthetic management of a pregnant patient affected by the disease. Case report: Female patient, 30 years old, 38 weeks' pregnant, diagnosed with fetal death that occurred about a day, and with SGB. Cesarean section was performed under general anesthesia, progressing without complications perioperatively. Conclusions: Although it is uncommon, GBS can affect pregnant women and the anesthesiologist may encounter such patients in his (her) daily practice. It is important to understand the peculiarities of GBS to adequately address the patient in the perioperative period, contributing to its better evolution. .

Justificativa e objetivos: A síndrome de Guillain Barré (SGB) é uma doença neurológica autoimune que se caracteriza por uma polirradiculoneurite desmielinizante aguda ou subaguda. É um evento incomum durante a gravidez e um desafio para o anestesiologista pela possibilidade de comprometimento da função neuromuscular e de complicações respiratórias no pós-operatório. O objetivo deste trabalho é discutir o manejo anestésico da paciente gestante afetada pela doença. Relato de caso: Paciente do sexo feminino com 30 anos, gestante de 38 semanas, com diagnóstico de óbito fetal havia um dia e SGB. Foi submetida à cesariana sob anestesia geral, evoluindo sem intercorrências no perioperatório. Conclusões: Apesar de ser incomum, a SGB pode acometer gestantes e o anestesiologista pode se deparar com esse tipo de paciente na sua prática diária. É importante compreender as peculiaridades da SGB para se abordar adequadamente a paciente no perioperatório, contribuindo para a sua melhor evolução. .

Justificación y objetivos: El síndrome de Guillain Barré (SGB) es una enfermedad neurológica autoinmune que se caracteriza por una polirradiculoneuritis desmielinizante aguda o subaguda. Es un evento poco común durante el embarazo y se le considera un reto para el anestesista por la posibilidad de compromiso de la función neuromuscular y de complicaciones respiratorias en el postoperatorio. El objetivo de este trabajo es discutir el manejo anestésico de la paciente gestante afectada por la enfermedad. Caso clínico: Paciente del sexo femenino con 30 años, gestante de 38 semanas, con diagnóstico de óbito fetal hacía un día y SGB. Fue sometida a cesárea bajo anestesia general, evolucionando sin intercurrencias en el perioperatorio. Conclusiones: A pesar de ser poco común, el SGB puede perjudicar a las gestantes y el anestesista puede tener que enfrentarse con ese tipo de paciente en su práctica diaria. Es importante comprender las peculiaridades del SGB para abordar adecuadamente a la paciente en el perioperatorio, contribuyendo así a su mejor evolución. .

The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anesthesiologists have encountered various difficulties in securing the airway. Therefore, we compare the intubation times and hemodynamic changes between the McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 obstetric patients were divided into 2 groups, orotracheally intubated with either the McGrath video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation times, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Intubation time in the McGrath video laryngoscope group was significantly longer than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group (P <0.01). The percentage of glottic opening was found to be higher in the McGrath video laryngoscope group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope provides excellent views during orotracheal intubation in obstetric anesthesia with normal airways.

Conflitos de interesses nas decisões por cesáreas: revisão sistemática / Conflicts of interest on deciding upon a cesarean section a systematic review

Introdução. O modelo tecnocrático de assistência ao parto e nascimento propõe uma lógica organizacional com práticas não baseadas em evidências científicas cujos desfechos se contrapõem ao bem-estar materno e infantil. No setor público ocorrem partos com excesso de intervenções e altas taxas de cesarianas. No setor privado, a maioria das mulheres é submetida a cesáreas. Em ambas as situações, pergunta-se a quem e por que é vantajoso o que se prescreve. Objetivos. Revisar sistematicamente a produção científica nacional e internacional que trata das circunstâncias em que o tema dos conflitos de interesses nas indicações de cesárea é abordado. Material e método. Revisão sistemática abrangente da literatura disponível, segundo a metodologia do Instituto Joanna Briggs. Resultados. Foram identificados 4.135 textos em 4 bases de dados - The Cochrane Library, EconPapers, CINAHL e Medline - dos quais 41 foram analisados após a aplicação de critérios.de inclusão. Os idiomas encontrados foram: inglês, francês, português e espanhol, com predominância do primeiro. A maioria trouxe a palavra cesárea entre seus descritores. Foram recorrentes termos ligados à prática de profissionais e às diferentes formas de pagamento ou financiamento da assistência. As influências sobre a decisão por cesárea são abordadas em diferentes análises da assistência.

Background. The technocratic model of childbirth care proposes a logical organizational with non-evidence based practices whose outcomes oppose the welfare of both mother and child. In the public sector births occur with excessive interventions and high rates of caesarean section. In the private sector, the majority of women are subjected to caesarean sections. In both situations, the question is to whom and why it is advantageous to perform those practices. Objectives. To review systematically national and international scientific literature which addresses the circumstances in which the issue of conflicts of interest in indications for cesarean section is approached Material and method. Comprehensive systematic review of the available literature, according to the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results. 4,135 texts were identified in four data bases The Cochrane Library, EconPapers, CINAHL, Medline - of which 41 were analyzed after applying inclusion criteria. Languages found were English, French, Portuguese and Spanish, English being the most common.

Raquianestesia em operação cesariana. Emprego da associação de bupivacaína hiperbárica (10 mg) a diferentes adjuvantes / Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Use of hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) combined with different adjuvants / Raquianestesia en operación por cesárea. Uso de la asociación de bupivacaina hiperbárica (10 mg) a diferentes adyuvantes

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A associação de anestésicos locais (AL) a adjuvantes por via subaracnóidea melhora a qualidade do bloqueio e prolonga a duração da analgesia. Foram avaliados os efeitos maternos e as repercussões neonatais da associação de sufentanil, morfina e clonidina à bupivacaína hiperbárica em cesariana eletiva. MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado, encoberto, com 96 pacientes distribuídas em quatro grupos: GI (sem adjuvante); GII (sufentanil; 5,0 µg); GIII (morfina; 100 µg); e GIV (clonidina; 75 µg). Foram avaliados: início e nível de bloqueio sensitivo; analgesia peroperatória; grau e tempo para regressão do bloqueio motor; duração da analgesia; sedação; repercussões materno-fetais. RESULTADOS: O início do bloqueio foi significativamente menor nos grupos com adjuvantes em comparação com o Grupo I. No peroperatório, pacientes dos Grupos I e III referiram dor. A duração da analgesia foi significativamente maior no Grupo II e o tempo para desbloqueio motor foi significativamente maior no Grupo IV. Prurido ocorreu nos grupos II e III. A sedação foi significativa no Grupo IV. A hipotensão arterial foi prolongada no Grupo IV. CONCLUSÃO: A adição de sufentanil e clonidina à bupivacaína hiperbárica proporcionou adequada anestesia para cesariana e boa analgesia pós-operatória. A clonidina causou mais sedação peroperatória e maior tempo para desbloqueio motor. O prurido foi evidente quando do emprego de opioides.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combination of local anesthetics (LA) with adjuvants for spinal anesthesia improves block quality and prolongs the duration of analgesia. It was evaluated the maternal effects and neonatal repercussions of sufentanil, morphine, and clonidine combined with hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective cesarean section. METHOD: Prospective, randomized, blinded study of 96 patients allocated into four groups: Group I (no adjuvant), Group II (sufentanil 5.0 µg), Group III (morphine 100 µg), and Group IV (clonidine 75 µg). It was evaluated the onset and level of sensory block, perioperative analgesia, degree and recovery time of motor block, duration of analgesia, sedation, and maternal-fetal repercussions. RESULTS: The onset of blockade was significantly faster in groups with adjuvants compared with Group I. Patients in Groups I and III reported pain during the perioperative period. Duration of analgesia was significantly higher in Group II and time to motor block recovery was significantly higher in Group IV. Pruritus occurred in Groups II and III. Sedation was significant in Group IV and there was prolonged arterial hypotension in Group IV. CONCLUSION: Addition of sufentanil and clonidine to hyperbaric bupivacaine provided adequate anesthesia for cesarean section and good postoperative analgesia. Clonidine caused more perioperative sedation and longer time to motor block recovery. Pruritus was evident when opioids were used.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: La asociación de anestésicos locales (AL) a adyuvantes por vía subaracnoidea mejora la calidad del bloqueo y prolonga la duración de la analgesia. Se evaluaron los efectos maternos y las repercusiones neonatales de la asociación de sufentanil, morfina y clonidina a la bupivacaina hiperbárica en la cesárea electiva. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo, randomizado, encubierto, con 96 pacientes distribuidas en cuatro grupos: GI (sin adyuvante); GII (sufentanil; 5,0 µg); GIII (morfina; 100 µg); y GIV (clonidina; 75 µg). Se evaluaron: el inicio y el nivel de bloqueo sensitivo; analgesia peroperatoria; el grado y el tiempo para la regresión del bloqueo motor; la duración de la analgesia; la sedación; y las repercusiones materno-fetales. RESULTADOS: El inicio del bloqueo fue significativamente menor en los grupos con adyuvantes en comparación con el Grupo I. En el perioperatorio, los pacientes de los Grupos I y III dijeron sentir dolor. La duración de la analgesia fue significativamente mayor en el Grupo II y el tiempo para el desbloqueo motor fue significativamente mayor en el Grupo IV. El prurito apareció en los grupos II y III. La sedación fue significativa en el Grupo IV. La hipotensión arterial se prolongó en el Grupo IV. CONCLUSIONES: La adición de sufentanil y clonidina a la bupivacaina hiperbárica proporcionó una adecuada anestesia para la cesárea como también una buena analgesia postoperatoria. La clonidina causó más sedación perioperatoria y un mayor tiempo para el desbloqueo motor. El prurito fue evidente cuando se usaron los opioides.