Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option as a bridge to heart transplant.

OBJECTIVE: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue therapy for patients in cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that patients bridged to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have decreased survival. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2018, for heart transplant recipients. Recipients bridged with any form of mechanical support and those without support were compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The primary end point was restricted mean survival time through 16.7 years. RESULTS: Of 26,918 recipients, 15,076 required no pretransplant mechanical support (56.0%). Support patients included 9321 with left ventricular assist devices (34.6%), 53 with right ventricular assist devices (0.2%), 258 with total artificial hearts (1.0%), 686 with biventricular assist devices (2.6%), 1378 with intra-aortic balloon pumps (5.1%), and 146 who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.5%). In the first 16.7 years post-transplant, compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, estimated adjusted restricted mean survival time was higher in patients who required no mechanical support (16.6 months [14.0-19.4]) and patients with a left ventricular assist device (16.5 months [99% confidence interval, 13.9-19.2]), an intra-aortic balloon pump (11.2 months [8.3-14.7]), or a biventricular assist device (6.6 months [3.6-10.3]). Restricted mean survival time in patients with a right ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart was similar to patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were estimated to survive 16.6 months less than nonmechanical circulatory support recipients. Bridge to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option, and these patients should be considered transplant candidates.

Advanced heart failure patients supported with ambulatory inotropic therapy: What defines success of therapy?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the profiles and outcomes of a cohort of advanced heart failure patients on ambulatory inotropic therapy (AIT). BACKGROUND: With the growing burden of patients with end-stage heart failure, AIT is an increasingly common short or long-term option, for use as bridge to heart transplant (BTT), bridge to ventricular assist device (BTVAD), bridge to decision regarding advanced therapies (BTD) or as palliative care. AIT may be preferred by some patients and physicians to facilitate hospital discharge. However, counseling patients on risks and benefits is critically important in the modern era of defibrillators, durable mechanical support and palliative care. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 241 patients on AIT. End points included transplant, VAD implantation, weaning of inotropes, or death. The primary outcomes were survival on AIT and ability to reach intended goal if planned as BTT or BTVAD. We also evaluated recurrent heart failure hospitalizations, incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF) and indwelling line infections. Unintended consequences of AIT, such reaching unintended end point (e.g. VAD implantation in BTT patient) or worse than expected outcome after LVAD or HT, were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age of the cohort was 60.7 ± 13.2 years, 71% male, with Class III-IV heart failure (56% non-ischemic). Average ejection fraction was 19.4 ± 10.2%, pre-AIT cardiac index was 1.5 ± 0.4 L/min/m2 and 24% had prior ventricular arrhythmias. Overall on-AIT 1-year survival was 83%. Hospitalizations occurred in 51.9% (125) of patients a total of 174 times for worsening heart failure, line complication or ventricular arrhythmia. In the BTT cohort, only 42% were transplanted by the end of follow-up, with a 14.8% risk of death or delisting for clinical deterioration. For the patients who were transplanted, 1-year post HT survival was 96.7%. In the BTVAD cohort, 1-year survival after LVAD was 90%, but with 61.7% of patients undergoing LVAD as INTERMACS 1-2. In the palliative care cohort, only 24.5% of patients had a formal palliative care consult prior to AIT. CONCLUSIONS: AIT is a strategy to discharge advanced heart failure patients from the hospital. It may be useful as bridge to transplant or ventricular assist device, but may be limited by complications such as hospitalizations, infections, and ventricular arrhythmias. Of particular note, it appears more challenging to bridge to transplant on AIT in the new allocation system. It is important to clarify the goals of AIT therapy upfront and continue to counsel patients on risks and benefits of the therapy itself and potential unintended consequences. Formalized, multi-disciplinary care planning is essential to clearly define individualized patient, as well as programmatic goals of AIT.

Predicting post-LVAD outcome: Is there a role for cognition?

BACKGROUND: Cognition has been found to influence risk of stroke and death for a variety of patient groups but this association has not been examined in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. We aimed to study the relationship between cognition, stroke, and death in a cohort of patients who received LVAD therapy. It was hypothesized that cognitive test results obtained prior to LVAD placement would predict stroke and death after surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 59 HF patients who had cognitive assessment prior to LVAD placement. Cognitive assessment included measures of attention, memory, language, and visualmotor speed and were averaged to produce one z-score variable per patient. Survival analyses, censored for transplant, evaluated predictors for stroke and death within a follow-up period of 900 days. RESULTS: For patients with stroke or death during the follow up period, the average cognitive z-score predicted post-LVAD stroke (HR = 0.513, 95% CI = 0.31-0.86, p = 0.012) and death (HR = 0.166, 95% CI = 0.06-0.47, p = 0.001). Cognitive performances were worse in the patients who suffered stroke or died. No other variable predicted stroke and death within the follow up period when the cognitive variable was in the model. CONCLUSION: Cognitive performance was predictive of post-LVAD risk of stroke and death. Results are consistent with findings from other studies in non-LVAD samples and may reflect early signs of neurologic vulnerability. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between cognition and LVAD outcomes in order to optimize patient selection, management, and advanced care planning.

Serially Measured Cytokines and Cytokine Receptors in Relation to Clinical Outcome in Patients With Stable Heart Failure.

In this prospective cohort study of 250 stable heart failure patients with trimonthly blood sampling, we investigated associations of 17 repeatedly measured cytokines and cytokine receptors with clinical outcome during a median follow-up of 2.2 (25th-75th percentile, 1.4-2.5) years. Sixty-six patients reached the primary end point (composite of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation). Repeatedly measured levels of 8 biomarkers correlated with clinical outcomes independent of clinical characteristics. Rates of change over time (slopes of biomarker evolutions) remained independently associated with outcome for 15 biomarkers. Thus, temporal patterns of cytokines and cytokine receptors, in particular tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B and interleukin-1 receptor type 1, might contribute to personalized risk assessment.

A Case of TAVR Complicated by Severe Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a known complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We report a case of a 90-year-old man with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent elective TAVR. The procedure was complicated by severe functional MR from left ventricular stunning and dilatation caused by hypotension throughout the procedure. An Impella CP (Abiomed, Inc, Danvers, MA) was inserted to unload the left ventricle and decrease its size with subsequent improvement in MR severity, which was sustained after Impella CP removal. In conclusion, we present the first case of successful management of post-TAVR severe functional MR with an Impella CP.

Insertion technique for the Impella 5.0 heart pump in the COVID-19 era.

We describe the insertion of the Impella 5.0, a peripherally placed mechanical cardiovascular microaxial pump, in a patient with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. The Impella is a 7 Fr device capable of achieving a flow of 4.0-5.0 L/min; its use necessitates an open arterial cut-down. A subclavicular incision is used to access the right or left axillary artery. A 10-mm tube graft is anastomosed to the artery through which the Impella 5.0 is inserted. The device traverses the tube graft and is advanced via the aorta, across the aortic valve, to its final position (inflow toward the ventricular apex and outflow above the aorta). The device may remain in situ for 10 days until recovery or until further supports are instituted. Our goal is to demonstrate the insertion of the Impella 5.0 device in a patient with cardiogenic shock whose situation was further complicated by coronavirus disease 2019.

Usefulness of regional right ventricular and right atrial strain for prediction of early and late right ventricular failure following a left ventricular assist device implant: A machine learning approach.

BACKGROUND: Identifying candidates for left ventricular assist device surgery at risk of right ventricular failure remains difficult. The aim was to identify the most accurate predictors of right ventricular failure among clinical, biological, and imaging markers, assessed by agreement of different supervised machine learning algorithms. METHODS: Seventy-four patients, referred to HeartWare left ventricular assist device since 2010 in two Italian centers, were recruited. Biomarkers, right ventricular standard, and strain echocardiography, as well as cath-lab measures, were compared among patients who did not develop right ventricular failure (N = 56), those with acute-right ventricular failure (N = 8, 11%) or chronic-right ventricular failure (N = 10, 14%). Logistic regression, penalized logistic regression, linear support vector machines, and naïve Bayes algorithms with leave-one-out validation were used to evaluate the efficiency of any combination of three collected variables in an "all-subsets" approach. RESULTS: Michigan risk score combined with central venous pressure assessed invasively and apical longitudinal systolic strain of the right ventricular-free wall were the most significant predictors of acute-right ventricular failure (maximum receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = 0.91-1.00, by the naïve Bayes), while the right ventricular-free wall systolic strain of the middle segment, right atrial strain (QRS-synced), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were the most significant predictors of Chronic-RVF (receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.91-1.00, according to naïve Bayes). CONCLUSION: Apical right ventricular strain as well as right atrial strain provides complementary information, both critical to predict acute-right ventricular failure and chronic-right ventricular failure, respectively.

Implante de un dispositivo de asistencia ventricular izquierda definitivo y circulación asistida en cuidados intensivos como terapia puente. Cuidados enfermeros: caso clínico / Permanent left ventricular assistance internal device implantation and assisted circulation in intensive care as bridge therapy. Nursing care: case report

A lo largo de los últimos años la implantación de Dispositivos de Asistencia Ventricular (DAV) está tomando un papel más relevante en el tratamiento de la Insuficiencia Cardíaca (IC). El uso de los DAV también está cambiando hacia la Terapia Definitiva (TD), conformándose como alternativa clara al trasplante cardíaco. La implantación de un DAV, en ocasiones, requiere previamente tratamiento emergente con otros dispositivos de Asistencia Circulatoria Mecánica (ACM) como Circulación Extracorpórea con Membrana de Oxigenación (ECMO) o Asistencia Ventricular paracorpórea Izquierda o Derecha. Por tanto, es necesario el ingreso en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) especializadas en estas terapias hasta la estabilización del paciente y toma de la decisión correcta. Se expone un caso clínico reciente de una persona que requiere asistencia inicial con ECMO V-A emergente en el hospital de origen y su traslado al centro de referencia para posterior asistencia biventricular paracorpórea e implantación definitiva de un DAVI (Dispositivo de Asistencia Ventricular Izquierda). Se exponen la secuencia de decisiones, complicaciones y el plan de cuidados de enfermería inicial en UCI con taxonomía NANDA. Es el primer implante de un DAVI, realizado en nuestro hospital. En él ha intervenido un enorme equipo multidisciplinar.

Over the past few years, the Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) implementation is taking a relevant role in the Heart Failure (HF) treatment. VADs ́s use is also shifting towards Definitive Therapy (TD), being a clear alternative to heart transplantation. The implantation of a VAD, sometimes, requires a previous emergent treatment with other Mechanical Circulatory Assistance (ACM) devices such as Extracorporeal Circulation with Oxygenation Membrane (ECMO) or Left or Right Paracorporeal Ventricular Assistance. So is necessary of a mobile team for emergency assistance with ECMO and transfer to Intensive Care Units (ICU) which is specialized in these therapies until the patient stabilizes and doctors takes the right decision. A recent clinical case of a patient is exposed. This person required assistance with emergent ECMO V-A (Venous-Arterial) in the hospital of origin and his transfer to the reference center for subsequent biventricular paracorporeal assistance and to the definitive implantation of LVAD (Left Ventricular Assist Device). The sequence of decisions, complications and the initial nursing care plan at ICU with NANDA taxonomy, are presented here. This is the first implant of a LVAD in our hospital. A huge multidisciplinary team has been involved in the project.

Mechanical circulatory support in the context of coronary artery bypass grafting.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the continuous innovation in mechanical circulatory support as an option for the management of patients in cardiogenic shock from myocardial infarction, it is important to understand the current evidence and recommendations for the use of these devices for patients who require or underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with cardiogenic shock who require or underwent coronary artery bypass surgery has not been well studied. Observational studies have shown that the use of intra-aortic balloon pump or percutaneous ventricular assist devices prior to revascularization lead to better survival. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) still carries significant risk of mortality and complications; the use of additional MCS devices for left ventricular unloading during ECMO improves outcomes. SUMMARY: MCS will continue to play an important role in coronary artery surgery patients. Multidisciplinary Cardiac Shock Team can assist in proper patient selection and device choice, whereas prospective clinical trials are required to provide evidence-based guidance towards the management of these patients.

An in vitro analysis of the PediMag and CentriMag for right-sided failing Fontan support.

OBJECTIVE: Right-sided mechanical circulatory support for failing Fontan physiology has been largely unsuccessful due to inherent hemodynamic differences between these patients and the target populations for most assist devices. This study uses advanced benchtop modeling of Fontan physiology to examine the use of PediMag and CentriMag to improve failing Fontan hemodynamics. METHODS: Each device was attached to a compliance-matched, patient-specific total cavopulmonary connection in vitro model that used resistances, compliances, and programmable waveforms to establish "failing Fontan" baseline hemodynamics (cardiac output [CO] = 3.5 L/min and central venous pressure ∼17 mm Hg). The ability of the assist devices to improve failing Fontan hemodynamics (reduce inferior vena cava pressure and augment CO) was investigated. RESULTS: Requiring complete Fontan pathway restriction, PediMag reduced inferior vena cava pressure by ∼10 mm Hg and supported CO augmentation up to 5 L/min. This was accompanied by an increase in superior vena cava pressure of ∼6 mm Hg. CentriMag produced similar hemodynamic changes without the need for pathway restriction or an increase in superior vena cava pressure. CONCLUSIONS: PediMag and CentriMag right-sided support led to a decrease in inferior vena cava pressure and augmentation of cardiac output. In the case of CentriMag, this is accomplished without an increase in superior vena cava pressure or the need for restrictive banding. This work provides further data to help with the optimal design of a Fontan assist device to ameliorate the growing need.

Outcomes of bridge to cardiac retransplantation in the contemporary mechanical circulatory support era.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes have improved in patients bridged to heart transplant on contemporary continuous-flow ventricular assist devices over the past decade. We evaluated mechanical circulatory support as a means to bridge patients to cardiac retransplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 464 patients who underwent cardiac retransplant from the United Network for Organ Sharing database between January 2006 and November 2016. Pre- and post-transplant data were compared between patients bridged to retransplant with mechanical circulatory support (n = 81) and those without mechanical circulatory support (n = 383). RESULTS: The mean ages for the patients in the mechanical circulatory support and nonmechanical circulatory support cohorts were 41.2 ± 16 years and 42.1 ± 15.7 years, respectively (P = .64). Patients bridged with mechanical circulatory support were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 29, 35.8%), a total artificial heart (n = 13, 16.0%), or a temporary or durable ventricular assist device (n = 39, 48.1%). Twelve patients (14.8%) were placed on a second device before retransplant. Thirty-nine percent of the mechanical circulatory support group were indicated for listing because of primary graft dysfunction or acute rejection versus 6% of the nonmechanical circulatory support group (P < .01). Likewise, 30% of patients in the mechanical circulatory support group were listed for cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared with 59% of the nonmechanical circulatory support group (P < .01). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the mechanical circulatory support group (17.8% vs 4.8%, P < .01). However, patients who were bridged with a ventricular assist device or total artificial heart had comparable midterm outcomes to the nonmechanical circulatory support group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who require mechanical circulatory support bridge to retransplantation belong to a high-risk cohort. Comparable midterm outcomes to the nonmechanical circulatory support cohort were demonstrated when patients' conditions allow for bridge with a ventricular assist device or total artificial heart. Bridging to retransplantation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remains a relative contraindication.

The role of long-term mechanical circulatory support in the treatment of end-stage heart failure.

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome of multifactorial aetiology with typical symptoms and diverse prevalence depending on the world region, reaching more than 10% in the population over 70 years of age. The prognosis, in spite of a dynamic improve- ment in medical therapy, remains poor. The only treatment for these patients is heart transplantation, however, its availability is highly limited because of the shortage of donor organs. Mechanical circulatory support can offer an alternative treatment for this patient cohort. In this review the authors discuss the present indications for, as well as results and complications of different types of long-term mechanical circulatory support. The long-term survival in patients receiving this therapy, in spite of many complication, is much better than in those receiving medical treatment. The use of mechanical circulatory support is an established treatment option for many patients with end-stage heart failure. The most important issue for the cardiologist is to identify patients eligible for this therapy in order to give them a chance for a longer life and better quality of life.

Mechanical circulatory support: 60 years of evolving knowledge.

Since the 1950s when the first devices for mechanical circulatory support were developed, there has been an impressive evolution of their technology. The first pioneering pumps were used to rescue acute complications after cardiac surgery. Advances in technology, increased knowledge of flow dynamics, and a more appropriate selection of the patients who actually need this support have contributed to significantly improve the benefits of this therapy. Today, mechanical circulatory support is an essential tool for the treatment of advanced heart failure. This strategy is used either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a destination therapy for patients who do not meet the transplant criteria. A third indication is the bridge to recovery option for those patients in whom the improvement in cardiac function may be so important that the pump can be removed and the transplantation circumvented. In addition, mechanical circulatory support has fostered marked improvements in several clinical aspects affecting both patient health and quality of life. Despite the improvements in the technology of the devices of the last generation, severe adverse effects are still the Achilles heel of mechanical circulatory support therapy. This review summarizes the history, the technology, the clinical outcomes, and the possible future directions of this therapy.

Management of Non-Reconstructable Critical Limb Ischemia.

At least 15% of patients with critical limb ischemia are not candidates for standard revascularization. In this day and age, with new techniques-including retrograde access to the foot-and numerous angioplasty and atherectomy techniques available, the critical limb ischemia patient can still be faced without options. Distal bypass surgery may still remain the gold standard, and likely permits the patient to have the best options for healing, but carries significant comorbidities after undergoing the procedure. There are patients who do not have targets of interest in their foot for arterial revascularization and there are patients who have very poor conduit or are very poor candidates due to their medical comorbidities. Guidelines as to who should and should not undergo surgery-or even percutaneous revascularization-are starting to become more widely accepted. We are starting to see the tide change and there is interest in this cohort of patients. There are patients with no distal target that may benefit from an arteriovenous bypass, which is regaining popularity and can be done completely endovascularly. The patient that may be a very poor candidate for intervention may benefit from arterial counterpulsation therapy and/or topical oxygen therapy (which are commercially available). They may also benefit from placental stem cell injection, which is undergoing Phase II trial assessment. We will review the current literature as it surrounds these potential therapeutic interventions for patients with significant lower extremity ischemia who do not have standard revascularization options.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Multicenter U.S. Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To study outcomes with use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We examined characteristics and outcomes of 1598 CTO-PCIs performed from 2012-2017 at 12 high-volume centers. RESULTS: Patient age was 66 ± 10 years; 86% were men. An MCS device was used electively in 69 procedures (4%) and urgently in 22 procedures (1%). The most commonly used elective MCS device was Impella 2.5 or CP (62%). Compared to patients without elective MCS, patients with elective MCS had higher prevalence of prior heart failure (55% vs 29%; P<.001), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (49% vs 35%; P=.02), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (34 ± 14% vs 50 ± 14%; P<.001). MCS patients had a higher prevalence of moderate/ severe calcification (88% vs 55%; P<.001) and higher J-CTO scores (3.1 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.2; P<.01), and a greater proportion underwent retrograde crossing attempts (55% vs 39%; P<.01). Despite more complex characteristics in MCS patients, technical success rates (88% vs 87%; P=.70) and procedural success rates (83% vs 87%; P=.32) were similar in the two groups. Use of elective MCS was associated with longer procedure and fluoroscopy times, and higher incidences of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (8.7% vs 2.5%; P<.01) and bleeding (7.3% vs 1.0%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Elective MCS was used in 4% of patients undergoing CTO-PCI. Despite more complex clinical and angiographic characteristics, elective use of MCS in high-risk patients is associated with similar technical and procedural success rates, but higher risk of complications, compared to cases without elective MCS.

[Surgical decision-making during treatment of a patient with multifocal atherosclerosis based on intraoperative epiaortic scanning]. / Vybor taktiki khirurgicheskogo lecheniia patsienta s mul'tifokal'nym aterosklerozom na osnove intraoperatsionnogo épiaortal'nogo skanirovaniia.

The article deals with a clinical case report regarding surgical management of a patient presenting with multifocal atherosclerosis. Taking into consideration critical stenoses of the anterior interventricular artery (80%) and circumflex artery (80%), as well as subocclusion of the left internal carotid artery and stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (60%), there were high risks for intraoperative cerebral circulation impairment. It was decided to perform a two-stage operation on the coronary and carotid beds. The envisaged scope of the intervention comprised: carotid endarterectomy on the left and coronary bypass grafting of the anterior interventricular and circumflex arteries in conditions of assisted circulation. The intraoperative epiaortic scanning revealed atheromatosis of the ascending portion of the aorta, thus making it impossible to cross-clamp the aorta for establishing distal anastomoses on the non-beating heart and proximal anastomoses on the aorta. A decision was made to change the treatment policy. The patient was subjected to endarterectomy from the left internal carotid artery and mammarocoronary bypass grafting of the anterior interventricular artery on the beating heart with the help of the Octopus myocardial stabiliser. The second stage consisted in stenting of the circumflex artery. This clinical case report demonstrates the necessity of precision diagnosis of an atherosclerotic lesion of the aorta by means of epiaortic scanning in order to prevent perioperative acute impairments of cerebral circulation.

Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly used as a bridge to decision in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Subsequently, these patients might be bridged to durable MCS either as a bridge to candidacy/transplantation, or as destination therapy. The aim of this study was to review support duration and clinical outcome of short-term MCS in cardiogenic shock, and to analyse application of this technology as a bridge to long-term cardiac support (left ventricular assist device, LVAD) from 2006 till June 2016. Using Cochrane Register of Trials, Embase and Medline, a systematic review was performed on patients with cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction, end-stage cardiomyopathy, or acute myocarditis, receiving short-term MCS. Studies on periprocedural, post-cardiotomy and cardiopulmonary resuscitation support were excluded. Thirty-nine studies, mainly registries of heterogeneous patient populations (n = 4151 patients), were identified. Depending on the device used (intra-aortic balloon pump, TandemHeart, Impella 2.5, Impella 5.0, CentriMag and peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), mean support duration was (range) 1.6-25 days and the mean proportion of short-term MCS patients discharged was (range) 45-66%. The mean proportion of bridge to durable LVAD was (range) 3-30%. Bridge to durable LVAD was most frequently performed in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy (22 [12-35]%). We conclude that temporary MCS can be used to bridge patients with cardiogenic shock towards durable LVAD. Clinicians are encouraged to share their results in a large multicentre registry in order to investigate optimal device selection and best duration of support.

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Management of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction is challenging. Mechanical circulatory support at the time of percutaneous coronary interventions may be necessary in these extreme-risk patients. We present a case in which the TandemHeart was used to support a patient with severe aortic stenosis, severe protected left main and circumflex disease, and severe cardiomyopathy and review the literature on this subject.