A comparative analysis of AI-based chatbots: Assessing data quality in orthognathic surgery related patient information.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the quality, reliability, readability, and similarity of data provided by different AI-based chatbots in the field of orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Guidelines on orthognathic surgery were reviewed, and a list of questions for patients to ask chatbots was produced by two reasearchers. The questions were categorized into 'General Information and Procedure' and 'Results and Recovery', with 30 questions in each category. Five different scoring criteria were used to evaluate the chatbot responses to 60 questions: Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool, Reliability Scoring System (adapted from DISCERN), Global Quality Scale (GQS), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Similarity Index. RESULTS: The highest mean values were observed in OpenEvidence for EQIP tool, SMOG, and Similarity Index, while for Reliability and GQS assessment criteria, MediSearch showed the highest values. When evaluated in terms of reliability and quality, all three AI-based chatbots demonstrated high reliability and good quality; however, they required at least a college-level education for readability based on the SMOG index. Additionally, upon assessment of similarity, ChatGPT-4 displayed high originality, while OpenEvidence exhibited a high degree of similarity. CONCLUSION: AI-based chatbots with a variety of features have usually provided answers with high quality, reliability, and difficult readability to questions. Although the medical information in the field of orthognathic surgery provided through chatbots is of higher quality, it is recommended that individuals consult their healthcare professionals on this issue.

Surgical Treatment of a Borderline Skeletal Class III Patient: an Interdisciplinary Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Class III malocclusion is considered the most challenging discrepancies in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. It is often difficult to classify borderline cases as surgical or non-surgical. The following case report is of a borderline Class III case with several missing maxillary premolars treated via an interdisciplinary approach. AIM: This clinical case highlights the importance of meticulous diagnosis to obtain optimal results in borderline Class III cases. The significance of an interdisciplinary approach in complex adult orthodontic cases was also discussed. CASE REPORT: Given the complexity of the case, the treatment required a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach with the intervention of multiple specialties including periodontics, prosthodontics, orthodontics, oral surgery and maxillofacial surgery. The presurgical orthodontic stage was achieved in preparation for LeFort I maxillary advancement. Third molars extractions along with implant placement were implemented. Finally, crown placement and connective tissue graft were completed to achieve an optimal result. Total treatment time was 1.7 years (20 months). Patient's profile and facial appearance were dramatically enhanced, and a stable functional Class II occlusion was attained despite the preexisting skeletal Class III. CONCLUSION: Borderline adult Class III cases require a delicate diagnostic approach to be able to distinguish a surgical from a non-surgical approach. Complex adult orthodontic cases require a diplomatic interdisciplinary approach from all required specialties in order to attain the most favorable results.

Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Rhinoplasty: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure Set.

SUMMARY: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery commissioned the multidisciplinary Rhinoplasty Performance Measure Development Work Group to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing both functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. One outcome measure and three process measures were identified. The outcome looked at patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty procedures. The process measures look at motivations and expectations of the procedure, airway assessment, and nonnarcotic shared decision-making strategies for pain management. All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Rhinoplasty Society, and the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. The Work Group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Maintenance of Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs.

A New Software Suite in Orthognathic Surgery : Patient Specific Modeling, Simulation and Navigation.

Orthognathic surgery belongs to the scope of maxillofacial surgery. It treats dentofacial deformities consisting in discrepancy between the facial bones (upper and lower jaws). Such impairment affects chewing, talking, and breathing and can ultimately result in the loss of teeth. Orthognathic surgery restores facial harmony and dental occlusion through bone cutting, repositioning, and fixation. However, in routine practice, we face the limitations of conventional tools and the lack of intraoperative assistance. These limitations occur at every step of the surgical workflow: preoperative planning, simulation, and intraoperative navigation. The aim of this research was to provide novel tools to improve simulation and navigation. We first developed a semiautomated segmentation pipeline allowing accurate and time-efficient patient-specific 3D modeling from computed tomography scans mandatory to achieve surgical planning. This step allowed an improvement of processing time by a factor of 6 compared with interactive segmentation, with a 1.5-mm distance error. Next, we developed a software to simulate the postoperative outcome on facial soft tissues. Volume meshes were processed from segmented DICOM images, and the Bullet open source mechanical engine was used together with a mass-spring model to reach a postoperative simulation accuracy <1 mm. Our toolset was completed by the development of a real-time navigation system using minimally invasive electromagnetic sensors. This navigation system featured a novel user-friendly interface based on augmented virtuality that improved surgical accuracy and operative time especially for trainee surgeons, therefore demonstrating its educational benefits. The resulting software suite could enhance operative accuracy and surgeon education for improved patient care.

Clinical and Cephalometric Analysis of Facial Soft Tissue.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide average of standard values in planning orthognathic surgery in Asians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three Asians with well-balanced facial profile, combined with class I occlusion and stabilized condylar head were evaluated using lateral cephalograms. RESULTS: Facial length (Nasion'-Menton') was 138.8 and 127.0 mm in male and female, respectively. Upper and lower lip length were 24.5 and 49.8 mm for male, and 22.2 and 45.1 mm for female, and maxillary incisor exposure was 2.0 and 4.0 mm in male and female, respectively. Nasolabial angle was 77.7° and 84.1° in male and female, respectively. Alar base, A point', and maxillary incisor were placed posteriorly to true vertical line by 10.6, 1.0, and 8.0 mm for male and 9.0, 0.8, and 6.9 mm for female. The horizontal distance between upper lip anterior and lower lip anterior was 2.1 mm for male and 2.6 mm for female, and the horizontal distance between A point' and B point' was 5.3 mm for male and 3.9 mm for female. Orbital rim' to A-point' was 12.4 and 11.3 mm in male and female, respectively. Pogonion' located posteriorly to glabella' by 2.7 mm for male and anteriorly to glabella' by 3.2 mm for female, and facial angle was 156.7° and 147.0° in male and female, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This quantitative analysis of facial profile in Asian will be helpful in evaluation of facial soft tissue and establishment of treatment plans for orthognathic surgery.

An assessment of the compliance of systematic review articles published in craniofacial surgery with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review.

CONTEXT: Systematic review evidence is increasing within craniofacial surgery. Compliance with recognised reporting guidelines for systematic review evidence has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance of systematic reviews published in craniofacial journals with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting criteria. DATA SOURCES, SEARCH TERMS AND STUDY SELECTION: Thomson Reuters impact factor was used to identify three top craniofacial journals. A search for all systematic review articles published in these journals from 1st May 2010 to 30th April 2015 was conducted using MEDLINE PubMed. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent researchers assessed each study for inclusion and performed the data extraction. Data included the article reference information; the pathology and interventions examined and compliance of each review article with the PRISMA checklist. DATA SYNTHESIS AND RESULTS: 97 studies were returned by the search. 62 studies proceeded to data extraction. The mean percentage of applicable PRISMA items that were met across all studies was 72.5% (range 28.6-96.2%). The area of poorest compliance was with the declaration of a study protocol (19.4% of studies). Only 37.1% of studies declared their source of funding. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance of systematic review articles within craniofacial surgery with areas of the PRISMA checklist could be improved.

Periodontal management in orthognathic surgery: early screening of periodontal risk and its current management for the optimization of orthodontic and surgical treatments.

Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery requires correcting mal-occlusions and coordination of arcades. In addition to improving the aesthetics, these treatments can ensure the achievement and sustainability of prosthetics and/or implants. Nevertheless, periodontal structures are easily damaged. Orthodontic displacement can only be applied in the absence of inflammation or weakened periodontal structure. An early detection of periodontal risk should be achievable by prescribers of a surgical-orthodontic treatment. Simplified periodontal examination, with easily detectable warning signs, will help to identify the periodontal risk. Although periodontal treatment follows current "non invasive" trend, some procedures remain necessary to prevent and/or remedy periodontal defects or diseases, such as mineral periodontal reinforcement corticotomy. It is essential that the patient meets all the practitioners to plan and assess the extent of the constraints necessary to optimize results, before starting orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery. Any periodontal complication (even minor) will be considered as a failure, regardless of good aesthetic and functional results.

Compliance with the minimum dataset of the British Orthodontic Society/British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons for record keeping for orthognathic patients: retrospective comparative multicentre audit.

Accurate and timely collection of clinical records is of utmost importance in planning, evaluating, and auditing orthognathic operations. The minimum dataset guidelines of the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) and the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) were published in an attempt to standardise the collection of clinical records of patients having orthognathic operations. This multicentre retrospective audit aimed to assess and compare compliance with the guidelines in 3 maxillofacial units over a 1-year period. A total of 105 cases were reviewed. Compliance varied. Documentation of altered sensation was consistently poor and too many unnecessary radiographs were taken. There may be a need to circulate the guidelines again to increase awareness and reduce variability between centres.

Soft tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic and cosmetic surgery.

PURPOSE: Proportionality of the lower and middle thirds of the face is a key determinant of successful orthognathic treatment. A flatter profile and marked variance of the soft tissue envelope in the Japanese population complicates the accurate assessment of these proportions. This study aimed to identify gender differences and establish norms for Japanese young adults using the method of soft tissue cephalometric analysis (STCA) by Arnett et al (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:239, 1999). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 49 young normal Japanese subjects (19 men, 30 women) were selected from the archival records and analyzed with STCA. The Student t test was used to compare mean values of the male and female groups. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between women and men. Men had a flatter occlusal plane and a more acute nasolabial angle than women. Men showed larger values for upper and lower lip thickness, menton soft tissue thickness, and vertical face length, especially in the lower third of the face. Women had a more projected midface than men. Compared with established STCA norms, the Japanese have more midfacial projection. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender differences were found in the thickness, lower third length, and midface projection in Japanese young adults, which should be taken into account when interpreting measurements for orthognathic surgical planning. These differences can serve as norms for STCA in young Japanese adults. Differences were noted between the reference values of Arnett et al and Japanese subjects.

Consent for orthognathic surgery: a UK perspective.

Obtaining consent to undertake orthognathic surgery is a legal requirement that starts at the initial visit when treatment is being considered and continues until the operation itself. The process includes discussion of the benefits, risks, and potential complications of the proposed procedure, and any alternative (including doing nothing), but there is no consensus about how much information should be disclosed. Guidance is provided on the basis of case law, which is itself evolving. The purpose of this study was to look at the current practice of obtaining consent for orthognathic surgery by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the UK to act as a benchmark and potentially to stimulate further debate. We also review common and serious complications that might be included in the process.

[Mediсo-organizational principles of orthopedic stomatological care rendering to patients with postoperative maxillofacial defects].

Complex research in which result key problems are revealed is done and the medico-organizational substantiation is given modern principles of rendering of the orthopedic care to the patients with maxillofacial defects.

Avaliação da previsibilidade e estabilidade da cirurgia ortognática no tratamento das maloclusões de classe II e classe III / Evaluation of the prediction results of orthognathic surgery and surgery stability on retention phase of class II and class III malocclusions

O objetivo desta pesquisa consistiu em avaliar a predictibilidade da cirurgia ortognática, utilizando o Programa Dolphin e a estabilidade ortocirúrgica, na fase de contenção, das maloclusões de Classe II e Classe III. Nos 3 estudos, 882 traçados cefalométricos foram executados para obtenção das medidas esqueléticas, dentárias e dos tecidos moles e analisar as diferenças entre as fases pré-cirúrgica, final, predictiva para os 2 primeiros estudos e adicionalmente, as fases inicial e de contenção para o terceiro estudo. Concluiu-se que as diferenças estatísticas verificadas entre o que foi planejado e o obtido não invalidam o software de predictibilidade cirúrgica, pois as modificações previstas aproximaram-se da realidade. Houve tendência a recidiva nos casos tratados de Classe II e estabilidade nos casos de Classe III.