Medication-Induced Weight Change Across Common Antidepressant Treatments : A Target Trial Emulation Study.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are among the most commonly prescribed medications, but evidence on comparative weight change for specific first-line treatments is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare weight change across common first-line antidepressant treatments by emulating a target trial. DESIGN: Observational cohort study over 24 months. SETTING: Electronic health record (EHR) data from 2010 to 2019 across 8 U.S. health systems. PARTICIPANTS: 183 118 patients. MEASUREMENTS: Prescription data determined initiation of treatment with sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, duloxetine, or venlafaxine. The investigators estimated the population-level effects of initiating each treatment, relative to sertraline, on mean weight change (primary) and the probability of gaining at least 5% of baseline weight (secondary) 6 months after initiation. Inverse probability weighting of repeated outcome marginal structural models was used to account for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement. In secondary analyses, the effects of initiating and adhering to each treatment protocol were estimated. RESULTS: Compared with that for sertraline, estimated 6-month weight gain was higher for escitalopram (difference, 0.41 kg [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.52 kg]), paroxetine (difference, 0.37 kg [CI, 0.20 to 0.54 kg]), duloxetine (difference, 0.34 kg [CI, 0.22 to 0.44 kg]), venlafaxine (difference, 0.17 kg [CI, 0.03 to 0.31 kg]), and citalopram (difference, 0.12 kg [CI, 0.02 to 0.23 kg]); similar for fluoxetine (difference, -0.07 kg [CI, -0.19 to 0.04 kg]); and lower for bupropion (difference, -0.22 kg [CI, -0.33 to -0.12 kg]). Escitalopram, paroxetine, and duloxetine were associated with 10% to 15% higher risk for gaining at least 5% of baseline weight, whereas bupropion was associated with 15% reduced risk. When the effects of initiation and adherence were estimated, associations were stronger but had wider CIs. Six-month adherence ranged from 28% (duloxetine) to 41% (bupropion). LIMITATION: No data on medication dispensing, low medication adherence, incomplete data on adherence, and incomplete data on weight measures across time points. CONCLUSION: Small differences in mean weight change were found between 8 first-line antidepressants, with bupropion consistently showing the least weight gain, although adherence to medications over follow-up was low. Clinicians could consider potential weight gain when initiating antidepressant treatment. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Evaluation and Comparison of Citalopram and Venlafaxine for Management of Hot Flashes in Women with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Premature menopause and hot flashes are the main complications of breast cancer treatments. About 40 to 50 percent of breast cancer women who undergo chemotherapy are experiencing premature menopause symptoms, including hot flashes. Some endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are associated with induction or aggravating hot flashes. Hot flashes are often debilitating and significantly impair daily functions. Therefore many therapeutic options have been studied so far for the management of this adverse effect. However, there are still some clinical challenges in managing hot flashes in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of venlafaxine and citalopram on hot flashes in breast cancer women receiving tamoxifen. DESIGN: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in forty-one, 35 to 65 years old female patients. The study lasted for four weeks, and the follow-up was for two months. Venlafaxine and citalopram treatments started with doses of 37.5 mg or 10 mg, respectively. Venlafaxine and citalopram dosages were increased in the second week to 75 and 20 mg, respectively. The study was conducted during the year 2017. KEY RESULTS: The results indicated that the total efficacy was significantly different in groups receiving citalopram, venlafaxine, and placebo. Total efficacy in the placebo group, venlafaxine, and citalopram was 14.3, 53.8, and 64.3%, respectively (p=0.02). During the second week, the efficacy in groups receiving citalopram, venlafaxine, and placebo was 57.1, 53.8, and 14.3%, respectively (p=0.04). Generally, both citalopram and venlafaxine were well tolerated. The associated adverse effects were mild to moderate in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although citalopram was associated with more adverse effects, including constipation, it was more effective in reducing the frequency of hot flashes when compared to venlafaxine or placebo.

Effects of nicorandil on QT prolongation and myocardial damage caused by citalopram in rats.

Citalopram is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant; it exhibits the greatest cardiotoxic effect among SSRIs. Citalopram can cause drug-induced long QT syndrome (LQTS) and ventricular arrhythmias. We investigated the protective effect of nicorandil, a selective mitochondrial KATP (mito-KATP) channel opener, on LQTS and myocardial damage caused by citalopram in male rats. In a preliminary study, we determined that the minimum citalopram dose that prolonged the QT interval was 102 mg/kg injected intraperitoneally. For the main study, rats were divided randomly into five experimental groups: untreated control, normal saline + citalopram, nicorandil + citalopram, 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD) + citalopram, 5-HD + nicorandil + citalopram. Biochemical and histologic data from blood and heart tissue samples from six untreated control rats were evaluated. Electrocardiographic parameters including QRS duration, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc) and heart rate (HR) were assessed, and biochemical parameters including malondialdehyde, reduced glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase were measured. We also performed histomorphologic and immunohistochemical examination of heart tissue. Citalopram prolonged QT-QTc intervals significantly and increased significantly the histomorphologic score and proportion of apoptotic cells, but produced no differences in the oxidant and antioxidant parameters. Nicorandil did not prevent citalopram induced QT-QTc interval prolongation and produced no significant changes in oxidant and antioxidant parameters; however, it did reduce histologic damage and apoptosis caused by citalopram.

Emotional blunting with bupropion and serotonin reuptake inhibitors in three randomized controlled trials for acute major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Emotional blunting is theorized to be an adverse effect of antidepressants, particularly serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but this has not been firmly established. Another possibility is that emotional blunting represents a residual depressive symptom. METHODS: We analyzed data from adult outpatients with acute major depressive disorder who participated in three 8-week randomized controlled trials. Trials 1 and 2 were pooled (venlafaxine, n = 378; bupropion, n = 389; placebo, n = 383) and Trial 3 (escitalopram, n = 254; bupropion, n = 260) was analyzed separately. Emotional blunting was measured with the "inability to feel" item from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: Emotional responsiveness improved, on average, in all treatment groups. Only a minority of participants (≤6 %) experienced more emotional blunting post-treatment, compared to baseline, with no significant differences between treatment groups, although roughly 20-25 % continued to report an inability to feel normal emotions at the final assessment. In Trials 1 and 2, emotional blunting was associated with poorer outcomes in terms of depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and sexual function, but these correlations were nearly identical in the placebo group. LIMITATIONS: The trials were short and cannot speak to the possibility of emotional blunting from long-term treatment. Emotional blunting was measured with a single item. CONCLUSIONS: The study medications did not significantly decrease emotional responsiveness, and there was no evidence that emotional blunting mediated treatment response. In acute treatment, emotional blunting may be better conceptualized as a residual symptom than as an adverse drug effect.

Proton pump inhibitors may enhance the risk of citalopram- and escitalopram-associated sudden cardiac death among patients receiving hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: Polypharmacy is common in the hemodialysis population and increases the likelihood that patients will be exposed to clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Concurrent use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with citalopram or escitalopram may potentiate the QT-prolonging effects of these selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors through pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic interactions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the U.S. Renal Data System (2007-2017) and a new-user design to examine the differential risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) associated with citalopram/escitalopram initiation vs. sertraline initiation in the presence and absence of PPI use among adults receiving hemodialysis. We studied 72 559 patients:14 983 (21%) citalopram/escitalopram initiators using a PPI; 26 503 (36%) citalopram/escitalopram initiators not using a PPI;10 779 (15%) sertraline initiators using a PPI; and 20 294 (28%) sertraline initiators not using a PPI (referent). The outcome of interest was 1-year SCD. We used inverse probability of treatment weighted survival models to estimate weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Compared with sertraline initiators not using a PPI, citalopram/escitalopram initiators using a PPI had the numerically highest risk of SCD (HR [95% CI] = 1.31 [1.11-1.54]), followed by citalopram/escitalopram initiators not using a PPI (HR [95% CI] = 1.22 [1.06-1.41]). Sertraline initiators using a PPI had a similar risk of SCD compared with those not using a PPI (HR [95% CI] = 1.03 [0.85-1.26]). CONCLUSIONS: Existing PPI use may elevate the risk of SCD associated with citalopram or escitalopram initiation among hemodialysis patients.

Comparison of the effect of citalopram, bupropion, sertraline, and tricyclic antidepressants on QTc: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Some data suggests that citalopram has more risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation than other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Consequently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration distributed a safety warning limiting the maximum dose for citalopram. There is also a suggestion that bupropion may decrease QTc in patients on drugs that increase QTc. The goals of this cross-sectional study were to examine (1) effects on QTc of citalopram compared to sertraline, bupropion, and tricyclic antidepressants; (2) dose dependent effects of citalopram; and (3) effects of bupropion on citalopram-mediated changes in QTc. METHODS: Records of subjects who received an EKG while taking one of the specified antidepressants were reviewed to collect demographic information, antidepressant history, and information about other confounders. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between QTc and antidepressants. RESULTS: 487 subjects provided 798 EKG records. The sample was 95% male with an average age of 61 years. No differences were found in QTc between citalopram and other antidepressants. No dose relationship was detected between citalopram and QTc. Bupropion did not affect the relationship between citalopram and QTc (coefficient = -3.4; 95%CI = -14.2, 7.5; p = 0.54). LIMITATIONS: Observational study designs are prone to biases from retrospective data collection. Some data subsets had small numbers of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: No effect of citalopram on QTc was found at therapeutic doses. Neither was there evidence of a "QTc-sparing" effect of bupropion. The risk of adverse cardiovascular effects from citalopram at doses of 60 mg per day or less appears minimal.

Comparing newborn outcomes after prenatal exposure to individual antidepressants: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare associations between individual antidepressants and newborn outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Deliveries in a large, US medical system. POPULATION: Women who received at least one antidepressant prescription 3 months prior to conception through delivery. METHODS: Eligible women had maternal characteristics and newborn outcomes extracted from medical record data. Exposure was defined by the timing of the prescription during pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Newborn outcomes (any adaptation syndrome, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission) were analyzed for each antidepressant and compared using standard statistics and multivariable regression compared to exposure to bupropion. Odds of outcomes based on timing of exposure were also explored. RESULTS: A total of 3,694 women were analyzed. Rates of any adaptation syndrome (p < 0.001), NICU admission (p < 0.001), and transient tachypnea of newborn (TTN) (p = 0.006) were significantly different between drugs. Infants exposed to duloxetine had the highest rates of NICU admissions (39.6%) and adaptation syndromes (15.1%). Venlafaxine-exposed infants had the highest rates of TTN (18.2%). Controlling for maternal age, race, insurance, and gestational age at delivery, early pregnancy antidepressant exposure was associated with adaptation syndrome and NICU admission for both duloxetine (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.31 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.11-4.80] and aOR 2.47 [95% CI 1.40-4.34], respectively) and escitalopram (aOR 1.72 [95% CI 1.09-2.70] and aOR 1.64 [95% CI 1.21-2.22], respectively). Exposure in the third trimester was associated with any adaptation syndrome for citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine and NICU admission for bupropion, citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, and fluoxetine. CONCLUSION: Duloxetine and escitalopram appear to have the strongest associations with any adaptation syndrome and NICU admission whereas bupropion and sertraline tended to have among the lowest risks of these outcomes. These results can help providers and patients discuss choice of individual antidepressant drugs during pregnancy.

La depresión: un desafío en la práctica médica general / La depresión: un desafío en la práctica médica general

Asociada o no a una enfermedad orgánica, la depresión tiene gran prevalencia en la práctica médica pero es subdiagnosticada. El trastorno del ánimo suele coexistir con variadas quejas somáticas y dolores crónicos, configurando síndromes mixtos con un diagnóstico diferencial complejo. En este artículo se describen distintas presentaciones clínicas de la depresión en medicina general, con énfasis en los estados depresivos atípicos, depresiones enmascaradas muy relevantes por su frecuencia y consecuencias: depresión posquirúrgica, cuadros dolorosos crónicos como cefaleas o lumbago, la fatiga crónica y la fibromialgia. Solo el reconocimiento y diagnóstico de la depresión subyacente posibilitará la implementación de las adecuadas intervenciones terapéuticas. Se revisan también algunas recomendaciones para el uso de antidepresivos en atención primaria y la eventual consulta psiquiátrica. (AU)

Associated or not with an organic disease, depression has a high prevalence in medical practice but is underdiagnosed. The mood disorder usually coexists with varied somatic complaints and chronic pain, forming mixed syndromes with a complex differential diagnosis. This article describes different clinical presentations of depression in general medicine, with emphasis on atypical depressive states, masked depressions very relevant for their frequency and consequences: post-surgical depression, chronic painful conditions such as headaches or lumbago, chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia. Only the recognition and diagnosis of the underlying depression will enable the implementation of appropriate therapeutic interventions. Some recommendations for the use of antidepressant drugs in primary care and the eventual psychiatric consultation are also reviewed. (AU)

Neonatal exposure to citalopram increases pyramidal and granular cell density in dorsal hippocampus of male but not female adult rats: a quantitative Nissl study / La exposición neonatal al citalopram aumenta la densidad de las células piramidales y granulares en el hipocampo dorsal de ratas adultas macho pero no en hembras: un estudio cuantitativo con tinción de Nissl

Antidepressants use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of autism spectrum disorders. Animal models based on early life alterations in serotonin availability replicate some of the anatomical and behavioral abnormalities observed in autistic individuals. In recent years there has been a growing interest in the possible role of the hippocampus in autism. The aim of study is to examine the effects of neonatal antidepressant (CTM) exposure during a sensitive period of brain development on pyramidal and granule cells density of hippocampal formation. We examined the pyramidal and granular cells density of dorsal hippocampus using Nissl stained sections obtained from neonatal citalopram (CTM) exposed rats (5 mg/kg, twice daily, s.c.), from postnatal day 8 to 21 (PN8-21), saline and non-exposed rats. The density of pyramidal cells was significantly increased by 10.2 % in CA1, 10.6 % in CA3 and 13.2 % in CA4 in CTM treated compared with non-treated or saline treated animals (p<0.0001). The density of granule cells in the dentate gyrus was significantly increased by 12.0 % in CTM treated compared with non-treated or saline treated animals (p<0.0001). These findings were obtained only from male rats, suggesting a sexual dimorphism in neural development after SSRI exposure. These data suggest that the neonatal exposure to CTM may induce long-lasting changes in the hippcampal formation in adults, and such effects appear to preferentially target males.

El uso de antidepresivos durante el embarazo se asoció con un mayor riesgo de trastornos del espectro autista. Los modelos animales basados en alteraciones tempranas de la vida en la disponibilidad de serotonina replican algunas de las anomalías anatómicas y de comportamiento observadas en individuos autistas. En los últimos años ha habido un interés creciente en el posible papel del hipocampo en el autismo. El objetivo del estudio fue examinar los efectos de la exposición al antidepresivo neonatal (CTM) durante un período sensible del desarrollo cerebral en la densidad de las células piramidales y granulares de la formación del hipocampo. Examinamos la densidad de las células piramidales y granulares del hipocampo dorsal utilizando secciones teñidas con Nissl obtenidas de ratas expuestas al citalopram neonatal (CTM) (5 mg / kg, dos veces al día, sc), desde el día postnatal 8 a 21 (PN8-21), solución salina y ratas no expuestas. La densidad de células piramidales se incrementó significativamente en un 10,2 % en CA1, 10,6 % en CA3 y 13,2 % en CA4 en CTM tratados en comparación con animales no tratados o tratados con solución salina (p <0,0001). La densidad de células granulares en el giro dentado aumentó significativamente en un 12,0 % en los animales tratados con CTM en comparación con los animales no tratados o tratados con solución salina (p <0,0001). Estos hallazgos se obtuvieron solo en ratas macho, lo que sugiere un dimorfismo sexual en el desarrollo neural después de la exposición a ISRS. Estos datos sugieren que la exposición neonatal a la CTM puede inducir cambios de larga duración en la formación del hipocampo en adultos, y estos efectos parecen dirigirse preferentemente a los machos.

Exposure to prenatal antidepressant alters medial prefrontal-striatal synchronization in mice.

Citalopram (CTM), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), has been widely used to treat panic disorders, such as depression which is one of the most disabling, yet common, psychiatric disorders. Although prenatal antidepressant exposure has a major impact on the neurobehavioral development of the offspring, such as anxiety, depression- and autism-like behaviors, the brain alterations of SSRI influence remained largely unknown. We show here, using electrophysiological recordings, that CTM exposure during the last 7 d of gestation can alter theta- and gamma-band oscillation and synchronization in the corticostriatal loop of 2-3 month-old mouse offspring. The dendritic length and number of dendritic branches in prefrontal neurons of these CTM-exposed mice are significantly reduced, consistent with decreased levels of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). In addition, the level of c-Fos in both the mPFC and striatum is significantly increased. Together, these results advance our understanding of a neural network that is potentially responsible for abnormalities induced by prenatal antidepressant exposure.

Comparative Cardiac Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis may be particularly susceptible to the lethal cardiac consequences of drug-induced QT prolongation because they have a substantial cardiovascular disease burden and high level of polypharmacy, as well as recurrent exposure to electrolyte shifts during dialysis. Electrophysiologic data indicate that among the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), citalopram and escitalopram prolong the QT interval to the greatest extent. However, the relative cardiac safety of SSRIs in the hemodialysis population is unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hemodialysis included in the US Renal Data System registry (2007-2014). We used a new-user design to compare the 1-year risk of sudden cardiac death among hemodialysis patients initiating SSRIs with a higher potential for prolonging the QT interval (citalopram, escitalopram) versus the risk among those initiating SSRIs with lower QT-prolonging potential (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline). We estimated adjusted hazard ratios using inverse probability of treatment weighted survival models. Nonsudden cardiac death was treated as a competing event. RESULTS: The study included 30,932 (47.1%) hemodialysis patients who initiated SSRIs with higher QT-prolonging potential and 34,722 (52.9%) who initiated SSRIs with lower QT-prolonging potential. Initiation of an SSRI with higher versus lower QT-prolonging potential was associated with higher risk of sudden cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.31). This association was more pronounced among elderly individuals, females, patients with conduction disorders, and those treated with other non-SSRI QT-prolonging medications. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneous QT-prolonging potential of SSRIs may differentially affect cardiac outcomes in the hemodialysis population.

Serotonergic Regulation and Cognition after Stroke: The Role of Antidepressant Treatment and Genetic Variation.

INTRODUCTION: Serotonin affects several brain functions including cognition. The serotonin transporter (SERT) regulates brain serotonin levels through reuptake into neurons. The gene encoding this transporter, the SERT gene, has several functional polymorphisms affecting the number of transporters and thereby the serotonin levels. SERT gene expression may be important for cognition and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) may improve cognition post stroke. We therefore examined the association between SERT genotypes, cognitive function and early treatment with the SSRI citalopram among non-depressed Caucasian stroke patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SERT gene polymorphisms in 270 non-depressed first-ever acute ischemic stroke patients randomized to citalopram, n = 130, or placebo, n = 140, were investigated. Patients were genotyped for a length polymorphism (L = long and S = short allele) and a single nucleotide polymorphism (A/G substitution) dividing the L-allele into LA and LG. According to these genotypes, patients were further grouped according to low (S/S, LG/S and LG/LG), medium (S/LA and LG/LA), or high functional gene expression (LALA). Cognition was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at 1 and 6 months. Mean SDMT scores according to genotype and randomization groups were compared using multiple logistic regression adjusting for age, stroke severity, premorbid functional status, and vascular risk factors including smoking, hypertension, and diabetes. RESULTS: Stratified by genotype groups, there were no statistically significant differences in SDMT scores between randomization groups. Placebo-treated patients with low SERT expression genotypes, however, tended to have lower mean SDMT scores (at 1 month: 30.2, SD 10.8) compared to citalopram-treated patients (33.6, SD 13.7). Within the placebo group, the low genotype expression patients had significantly lower adjusted mean SDMT scores at 1 month compared to the high genotype expression patients (adjusted mean difference of -6 points, CI -12.0 to -0.05). We found similar results at 6 months, although not statistically significant. The genotype expression was not associated with SDMT scores among citalopram-treated patients. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in cognition between citalopram and placebo-treated patients according to the genotype group. Our results indicate, however, that low expression SERT genotype may contribute to reduced cognitive function post stroke as placebo-treated patients with low SERT expression tended to score lower on the SDMT. The significant difference in SDMT scores between low and high expression patients was present only in the placebo-treated group, thereby warranting further exploration of the potential effect of early citalopram treatment on cognitive functioning. Our results are preliminary and need replication in larger-scale studies.

Effect of Citalopram for the Treatment of Neurocardiogenic Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) is a common form of syncope. Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other medications have been used to treat NCS with variable success, there is no consensus regarding a first-line therapy. STUDY QUESTION: To assess the effects of citalopram in NCS and to examine the effect of diagnostic use of the head-up tilt table (HUTT) versus empirical diagnosis on patient outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series of 1000 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with NCS and treated with citalopram. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measure was well-being score (WS) recorded at each outpatient visit. RESULTS: After excluding patients who had other comorbidities, were taking daily medication, or did not attend a follow-up visit within 1 month after treatment initiation, data from 186 patients were included. Thirty-five patients were diagnosed empirically, and 151 patients were diagnosed with the HUTT. All 186 patients were followed up within 1 month (early follow-up); of these, 92 patients attended a second follow-up after 1 month (late follow-up). The early follow-up group showed a significant improvement in mean WS (7.35 vs. 4.46, P < 0.001) and only 5 patients discontinued therapy because of intolerability. The late follow-up group also showed significant improvements in mean WS at the early follow-up (7.42 vs. 4.43, P < 0.001) and late follow-up (7.42 vs. 4.26, P < 0.001). Of 186 patients who were treated with citalopram, only 11 reported the development of undesirable side effects. There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who were diagnosed empirically versus those who were diagnosed with the HUTT. CONCLUSIONS: Citalopram seems to have desirable effects on NCS and patient well-being. Diagnostic use of the HUTT is useful for confirming diagnoses of NCS but is not likely to improve patient outcome.

Second-generation anti-depressants and risk of new-onset seizures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Anti-depressants are among the most widely-prescribed medications. It is unknown whether the risk of seizure during therapeutic use differs by drug. We ranked the seizure risk of popular anti-depressants. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study between April 2002 and March 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Cases were Ontario residents aged ≥65 years hospitalized for a first-ever seizure within 60 d of filling a prescription for one of nine second-generation anti-depressants, each dispensed more than 1 million times (range: 1,196,810 [fluvoxamine] to 19,849,930 [citalopram]) during the study period. For each case, we identified up to four seizure-free controls receiving a similar anti-depressant, and matched on age, sex, date and a pre-defined seizure-specific disease risk index. RESULTS: We identified 5701 patients hospitalized with a first-ever seizure and matched them with 21,872 controls. Relative to bupropion, the risk of new-onset seizure during therapeutic use was highest for escitalopram (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.25) and citalopram (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.35-2.07), while no incremental risk was found for fluoxetine (OR 1.02; 95%CI 0.78-1.33) and duloxetine (OR 0.94; 95%CI 0.75-1.22). Other anti-depressants were associated with modest increase in seizure risk. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of seizure during therapeutic use among elderly patients varies among second-generation anti-depressants. Escitalopram and citalopram are associated with the highest risk. Prescribers should consider the seizure risk of individual anti-depressants and use discretion when selecting an anti-depressant, especially for patients with other risk factors for seizure. Frontline clinicians should be cognizant of this differential risk.

Possible SAMe-induced mania.

This paper describes a patient who presented with mania with psychotic features in the context of concomitant use of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). The aim of this case report is to provide medical practitioners with a greater awareness of the possibility of a psychotic episode and/or mania manifesting with concurrent use of SAMe and SSRI.

Association of Antidepressant Use With Drug-Related Extrapyramidal Symptoms: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are one of the most prescribed classes of medications. A number of case reports have linked these drugs to extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs), but no large epidemiologic study to date has examined this association. We sought to quantify the association of EPSs with different antidepressants by undertaking a large pharmacoepidemiologic study. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using a large health claims database in the United States from June 2006 to December 2015. Subjects with a diagnosis of primary Parkinson disease and those who received prescriptions of levodopa, ropinirole, pramipexole, domperidone, metoclopramide, entacapone, benztropine, selegiline, rasagiline, diphenhydramine, trihexyphenidyl, typical and atypical antipsychotics, and tricyclic antidepressants were excluded. Cases were followed to the first billing code for an extrapyramidal event or last date of enrollment in the cohort. For each case, 10 control subjects were matched by follow-up time, calendar time, and age through density-based sampling. Rate ratios were computed using conditional logistic regression adjusting for other covariates. RESULTS: We identified 3,838 subjects with EPSs compared with 38,380 age-matched control subjects. Rate ratios with respect to EPSs were as follows: duloxetine, 5.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.29-7.53); mirtazapine, 3.78 (95% CI, 1.71-8.32); citalopram, 3.47 (95% CI, 2.68-4.50); escitalopram, 3.23 (95% CI, 2.44-4.26); paroxetine, 3.07 (95% CI, 2.15-4.40); sertraline, 2.57 (95% CI, 2.02-3.28); venlafaxine, 2.37 (95% CI, 1.71-3.29); bupropion, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.67-3.21); and fluoxetine, 2.03 (95% CI, 1.48-2.78). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrates a harmful association between the incidence of Parkinson disease or associated EPSs and use of the antidepressants duloxetine, mirtazapine, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, bupropion, and fluoxetine.

Meta-analysis: Second generation antidepressants and headache.

BACKGROUND: To assess the risk of headache associated with commonly prescribed antidepressant medications and to examine the impact of medication class, pharmacodynamics and dosage on risk of headache. METHODS: We searched PubMed to identify all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials examining the efficacy of second generation antidepressant medications in the treatment of adults with depression, anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders. We used a fixed-effect meta-analysis to examine the pooled risk ratio of headache reported as a side-effect in adults treated with second generation antidepressants compared to placebo. We used stratified subgroup analysis and meta-regression to examine the effects of medication type, class, dosage, indication, and receptor affinity profile on the measured risk of headache. RESULTS: SSRIs were associated with a significantly increased risk of headache (RR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.00-1.13, z = 2.0, p = 0.045) when compared to placebo. There was no significant difference (test for subgroup differences χ2 = 2.2, df = 1, p = 0.14) in the risk of headache between SSRIs and SNRIs (RR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.88-1.06, p = 0.63). There was no significant difference in the relative risk of headache with second generation antidepressants based on diagnostic indication, pharmacological properties and dosage of medications. The only antidepressants that were found to be significantly associated with increased risk of headache compared to placebo were bupropion (RR = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.06-1.41, z = 2.73, p = 0.006) and escitalopram (RR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.01-1.37, z = 2.11, p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: The small number of studies that examined side effects within fixed-dose trials may have limited the power to examine the association between medication dosing and risk of headache. Additionally, reporting bias could potentially occur non-randomly across agents and therefore effect meta-analysis results. CONCLUSIONS: Headaches reported after the initiation of second generation antidepressant medications are more likely to be coincidental than a treatment-emergent side effect of these medications.

Looking for bipolarity in antidepressant discontinuation manic states: Update and diagnostic considerations of the phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressant withdrawal manic states are intriguing and under-recognized phenomena. The associated patho-physiological pathways are ill defined and the inclusion of the phenomena in the bipolar spectrum disorders is questionable. This study aims to update a review on antidepressant discontinuation manic states published in 2008 and to look for hints alluding to bipolar disorder in the affected published cases and in the literature. It also reviews the different hypotheses proposed to explain discontinuation mania. METHODS: We searched Pubmed using the key words: 'antidepressant withdrawal' or 'antidepressant discontinuation' plus 'mania' or 'hypomania' from January 2008 until January 2018. RESULTS: Five new eligible reports were identified since the last review in 2008, involving the antidepressants Amitriptyline, Fluoxetine, Escitalopram and Mirtazapine. Hypotheses involve the implication of Catecholamines, Acetylcholine and Serotonin in the pathophysiology of this paradoxical phenomenon. Careful analysis of the total 29 cases revealed psychiatric histories in favor of a bipolar spectrum disorder in 12 individuals while five were already known to have bipolar disorder. LIMITATIONS: This review is based on case reports with associated recall bias, and lack of in-depth description at times. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant discontinuation manic or hypomanic states do not occur randomly. An individual susceptibility to bipolar disorder must be considered.

[Citalopram and QT prolongation]. / Citalopram a prodlouzený QT interval.

In 2011/2012, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about the effect of citalopram on the QT interval and decreased its dosing. Further studies addressing this issue have been published since then. The authors were interested to know whether or not the studies have furnished new information that could modify or further specify the FDA-issued recommendations. After analyzing the most relevant studies, the authors concluded that even papers published within the last 5 years confirmed that, of the SSRI class of drugs, citalopram prolongs the QT interval most significantly. While the QT interval prolongation in young and otherwise healthy individuals is small and treatment with citalopram relatively safe, in elderly comorbid patients with polypharmacy, use of even currently recommended doses may result in significant QT interval prolongation. Hence, the decision about future therapy will depend on the degree of risk of each individual patient. Judging by the most recent data, citalopram is not more effective compared with the other SSRIs. As a result, therapy with citalopram will presumably show a declining trend, particularly in elderly patients.Key words: citalopram - escitalopram - QT interval - SSRI.