Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of drug interactions at the P2Y12 receptor between selatogrel and oral P2Y12 antagonists.

Selatogrel is a potent and reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist developed for subcutaneous self-administration by patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. After single-dose emergency treatment with selatogrel, patients are switched to long-term treatment with oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Selatogrel shows rapid onset and offset of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) to overcome the critical initial time after acute myocardial infarction. Long-term benefit is provided by oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists such as clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. A population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model based on data from 545 subjects in 4 phase I and 2 phase II studies well described the effect of selatogrel on IPA alone and in combination with clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. The PK of selatogrel were described by a three-compartment model. The PD model included a receptor-pool compartment to which all drugs can bind concurrently, reversibly or irreversibly, depending on their mode of action. Furthermore, ticagrelor and its active metabolite can bind to the selatogrel-receptor complex allosterically, releasing selatogrel from the binding site. The model provided a framework for predicting the effect on IPA of selatogrel followed by reversibly and irreversibly binding oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists for sustained effects. Determining the timepoint for switching from emergency to maintenance treatment is critical to achieve sufficient IPA at all times. Simulations based on the interaction model showed that loading doses of clopidogrel and prasugrel administered 15 h and 4.5 h after selatogrel, respectively, provide sustained IPA with clinically negligible drug interaction. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? Selatogrel is a potent reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist developed for subcutaneous self-administration by patients in case of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Transition to oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists without drug interaction and sufficient inhibition of platelet aggregation must be assured at all times. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model semimechanistically describes the effect of selatogrel on platelet inhibition alone and in combination with the oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Model-based simulations showed that loading doses of clopidogrel and prasugrel can be administered from 15 h and 4.5 h after selatogrel, respectively. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE? These results support guiding the clinical transition from selatogrel emergency treatment to oral maintenance therapy in a safe and efficacious way.

Use of the VerifyNow point of care assay to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of loading and maintenance dose regimens of prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are potent oral platelet P2Y12 inhibitors and are recommended over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Oral platelet P2Y12 inhibitors are characterized by varying degrees of pharmacodynamic response profiles as assessed by a variety of commercially available assays. Because of its ease of use, rapid turnaround times and ability to provide results specific to P2Y12 inhibitory effects, VerifyNow has emerged as one of the most commonly utilized platelet function assays. However, reference ranges with VerifyNow have been reported mainly for clopidogrel and there has not yet been any study specifically conducted to provide the expected on treatment reference ranges following administration of prasugrel and ticagrelor. This was a prospective single center investigation conducted in 120 patients with ACS who were treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor as per standard of care. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were treated with a loading dose of prasugrel (60 mg) or ticagrelor (180 mg), and patients who were on maintenance therapy were taking prasugrel (10 mg qd or 5 mg qd) or ticagrelor (90 mg bid). Platelet function testing was performed using the VerifyNow™ PRUTest™. The overall range of PRUTest values was lower than that observed in studies of patients treated with clopidogrel. The use of a maintenance dose regimen had a wider range of PRUTest values compared to the use of a loading dose for both prasugrel (1-179 vs. 2-128) and ticagrelor (1-196 vs. 1-177). The average PRUTest values in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor maintenance dosing were 20% and 9% higher those observed in patients treated with a loading dose. PRUTest results following loading dose administration were very similar between drugs, but were 20% higher with prasugrel compared with ticagrelor during maintenance dosing. This study establishes expected PRUTest ranges for patients taking loading and maintenance doses of prasugrel and ticagrelor.Clinical Trial Registration http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT04492423, registered July 2020 retrospectively registered.

Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over PrasugreL: a MUlticenter Randomized Open-label Trial in PatientS with ST-elevation Myocardial InFarction Referred for PrimAry PercutaneouS InTERvention (FABOLUS FASTER) Trial: Design and Rationale : The FABOLUS FASTER Trial.

Antithrombotic therapy is a critical component of the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Rapid and profound inhibition of platelet reactivity has been shown to mitigate the ischemic risks and improve myocardial salvage. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) has been reported up to 4 or 6 h after loading dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor; therefore, multiple alternative strategies, including crushed or chewed oral tables or intravenous agents, have been investigated to provide a more rapid and sustained inhibition of platelet function and bridge the initial treatment gap. The FABOLUS FASTER is the first investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, prospective, randomized study to directly compare the pharmacodynamics effects of cangrelor, tirofiban, chewed or integer prasugrel. This study will add new insights in the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI and might be hypothesis-generating for future clinical trials in this field. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02978040, and EudraCT 2017-001065-24.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Approved and Investigational P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists.

Coronary artery disease remains the major cause of mortality worldwide. Antiplatelet drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are cornerstone treatments for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Clopidogrel has long been the gold standard but has major pharmacological limitations such as a slow onset and long duration of effect, as well as weak platelet inhibition with high inter-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. There has been a strong need to develop potent P2Y12 receptor antagonists with more favorable pharmacological properties. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent and have a faster onset of action; however, they have shown an increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor is highly potent and has a very rapid onset and offset of effect; however, its indication is limited to P2Y12 antagonist-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Two novel P2Y12 receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development, namely vicagrel and selatogrel. Vicagrel is an analog of clopidogrel with enhanced and more efficient formation of its active metabolite. Selatogrel is characterized by a rapid onset of action following subcutaneous administration and developed for early treatment of a suspected acute myocardial infarction. This review article describes the clinical pharmacology profile of marketed P2Y12 receptor antagonists and those under development focusing on pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction liability.

Pharmacodynamic assessment of prasugrel and clopidogrel in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke: a multicenter, randomized, active-control clinical trial.

Prasugrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist, has been shown to be more effective than clopidogrel for preventing cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We investigated the dose-response antiplatelet effects of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. The influence of cytochrome P450 (CYP) polymorphisms on the antiplatelet effects of both drugs was also compared. In this multicenter randomized active-control comparative study, patients were randomized to receive prasugrel 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 7.5 mg (double blind) or clopidogrel 75 mg (open label) once daily for 14 days. The primary endpoint was inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) in response to adenosine diphosphate 20 µM within 8 h of study drug administration on day 14. Of the 66 patients randomized, data from 63 (prasugrel 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 7.5 mg groups, n = 14, 16, and 18, respectively; clopidogrel group, n = 15) were used in the pharmacodynamic assessment. IPA (arithmetic mean ± SD) after prasugrel administration increased dose-dependently (33 ± 9%, 44 ± 11%, and 53 ± 14%, at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 7.5 mg, respectively) and was higher in these groups than after clopidogrel (23 ± 16%). In a subgroup of CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, IPA was higher in the prasugrel 5 mg and 7.5 mg groups than in the clopidogrel group. No death or serious adverse events were reported. Prasugrel was well tolerated at doses up to 7.5 mg/day and had antiplatelet effects higher than those of clopidogrel 75 mg/day. CYP2C19 polymorphisms may have reduced clopidogrel-induced IPA.

Concomitant use of drugs known to cause interactions with oral antiplatelets-polypharmacy in acute coronary syndrome outpatients in Finland.

PURPOSE: Use of oral antiplatelets (OAPs) is essential for preventing thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor may be enhanced due to pharmacodynamic interactions, but as CYP substrates, they are prone to pharmacokinetic interactions too. The aim was to study polypharmacy in ACS patients following hospital discharge. METHODS: This observational drug utilization study linked patient-level data from nationwide registers. The study population consisted of adult ACS patients discharged from Finnish hospitals in 2009-2013. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of drug-drug interactions with odd ratios for predefined predictors such as age, gender, and ACS type. RESULTS: In the cohort of 54,416 ACS patients, 91% of those treated with OAP received clopidogrel. Of clopidogrel-treated patients, 12% purchased warfarin at least once while on clopidogrel treatment. Old age, male sex, ST-elevation myocardial infarction as index event, and a history of previous ACS events were associated with an increased risk of warfarin-OAP interaction (p < 0.001 for all). Ibuprofen, and serotonergic drugs tramadol, citalopram, and escitalopram were the next most common drugs causing pharmacodynamic interactions. In general, concomitant use of drugs known to cause pharmacokinetic interactions was rare, but both esomeprazole and omeprazole were prescribed in more than 6% of clopidogrel-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin and ibuprofen were the most commonly used concomitant medications causing pharmacodynamic interactions and potentially increasing the risk of bleeding in OAP-treated patients. Esomeprazole and omeprazole were used in clopidogrel-treated patients although there are alternatives available for gastric protection.

Efficacy of P2Y12 Receptor Blockers After Myocardial Infarction and Genetic Variability of their Metabolic Pathways.

BACKGROUND: Various antiplatelet drugs are used following Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS). Of them, adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y12 inhibitors clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor are currently used for post-ACS long-term treatment. Although they act on the same receptor, they differ in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Several enzymes and transporters involved in the metabolism of P2Y12 inhibitors show genetic variability with functional impact. This includes Pglycoprotein, carboxylesterase 1 and, most notably, CYP2C19 that is important in clopidogrel activation. Common gain-of-function or loss-of-function alleles of CYP2C19 gene are associated with lower or higher platelet reactivity that may impact clinical outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. Prasugrel is considered to be less dependent on CYP2C19 variability as it is also metabolized by other CYP450 isoforms. Some studies, however, showed the relevance of CYP2C19 variants for platelet reactivity during prasugrel treatment as well. Ticagrelor is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4, which does not show functionally relevant genetic variability. Its concentrations may be modified by the variants of Pglycoprotein gene ABCB1. While no substantial difference between the clinical efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor has been documented, both of them have been shown to be superior to clopidogrel in post-ACS treatment. This can be partially explained by lower variability at each step of their metabolism. It is probable that factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of both drugs, including genetic factors, may predict the clinical efficacy of antiplatelet treatment in personalized medicine. CONCLUSION: We summarize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of P2Y12 inhibitors with respect to their clinical effects in post-myocardial infarction treatment.

Impact of Boosted Antiretroviral Therapy on the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Clopidogrel and Prasugrel Active Metabolites.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prasugrel and clopidogrel are inhibitors of the ADP-P2Y12 platelet receptor used in acute coronary syndrome patients. They require bioactivation via isoenzymes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2C19 and CYP2B6. Ritonavir and cobicistat are potent CYP3A inhibitors, prescribed as pharmacokinetic (PK) enhancers in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. METHODS: In this study, the impact of boosted antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) on the PK of clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolites (AMs), and on the efficacy of prasugrel and clopidogrel, were evaluated in a randomized crossover clinical trial. RESULTS: A significantly lower exposure to clopidogrel AM [3.2-fold lower area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)] and prasugrel AM (2.1-fold and 1.7-fold lower AUC and Cmax) were demonstrated in HIV-infected patients treated with boosted ARTs compared with healthy controls; however, a differential impact was observed on platelet inhibition between clopidogrel and prasugrel. Clopidogrel 300 mg induced adequate (although modest) platelet inhibition in all healthy subjects, while platelet inhibition was insufficient in 44% of HIV patients. On the contrary, prasugrel 60 mg induced a potent platelet inhibition in both healthy and HIV-infected subjects. CONCLUSION: Prasugrel appears to remain an adequate antiplatelet agent in HIV-infected patients and could be preferred to clopidogrel in this context, regardless of the metabolic interaction and inhibition of its bioactivation pathways.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses of Prasugrel in Pediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Anemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prasugrel, a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, inhibits ADP-mediated platelet activation and aggregation in patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model in pediatric patients from 2 to <18 years of age with SCA, and performed exposure-response evaluations to characterize the effects of prasugrel in a subset of these patients who weighed 19 kg or more and experienced at least two episodes of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) in the past year. METHODS: A three-compartment popPK model adapted from that used in adults with acute coronary syndrome was used to describe the relationship between plasma concentrations of prasugrel's active metabolite (Pras-AM) and time using data from phase II and III clinical studies in children. A VOC event rate model was developed from the phase III study to explore the exposure-response relationship between Pras-AM exposure and VOC, and included evaluation of covariates. RESULTS: The final popPK model for children with SCA provided a reasonable fit to Pras-AM plasma concentrations over time, with estimates of apparent clearance (CL/F) (172 L/h) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) (51.7 L) that were comparable to previous studies in adults. The final model included weight as a covariate on both CL/F and Vd/F, and age as a covariate on CL/F. Analyses of safety (bleeding events requiring medical intervention) and efficacy (VOC event rate) variables showed no apparent relationship to model-predicted Pras-AM exposure quartiles, and no statistically significant effects of intrinsic or extrinsic factors on the VOC event rate were identified in the VOC event rate model. The effect of post hoc exposures on the VOC event rate did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A popPK model was developed that provided reasonable parameter estimates, goodness-of-fit diagnostics, and visual predictive checks when applied to Pras-AM plasma concentrations in pediatric patients with SCA. Post hoc exposures obtained from this model did not correlate with measures of VOC or bleeding events in this population.

Prasugrel in critically ill patients.

While prasugrel is indicated for the treatment of myocardial infarction, its effects in the most severely affected patients requiring intensive care is unknown, so that we measured the antiplatelet effects and sparse pharmacokinetics of prasugrel in critically ill patients. Twenty-three patients admitted to medical intensive care units, who were treated with 10 mg prasugrel once daily, were included in this prospective trial. Critically ill patients responded poorly to daily prasugrel treatment: adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation in whole blood classified 65 % (95 % confidence intervals (CI) 43-84 %) of patients as having high on treatment platelet reactivity, platelet function under high shear rates even 74 % (95 %CI 52-90 %). There was only limited additional inhibition provided 2 hours after the next dose of prasugrel. In contrast, insufficient inhibition of the target was only seen in 26 % (95 %CI 10-48 %) of patients as measured by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay. Low effective plasma levels of prasugrel active metabolite were measured at trough [0.5 (quartiles 0.5-1.1) ng/ml at baseline], and 2 hours after intake [5.7 (3.8-9.8) ng/ml], but showed coefficients of variation of ~70 %. In sum, inhibition of platelet aggregation by prasugrel is not uniform but highly variable in critically ill patients, similar to clopidogrel in a general population. The pharmacokinetic measurements indicate that poor absorption/metabolism of prasugrel may partly contribute while inflammation induced heightened intrinsic platelet reactivity may also play a role.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Prasugrel in Japanese Elderly Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An increased incidence in bleeding events has been reported in Western elderly patients receiving prasugrel. Therefore, doses in Japanese elderly subjects need to be carefully determined. We assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of prasugrel at the clinical dose used in Japan in healthy Japanese elderly subjects compared with non-elderly subjects. METHODS: In an open-label parallel-group study conducted in Japan, two groups (elderly, aged >75 years; non-elderly, aged 45-65 years) received a 20-mg loading dose and a 3.75-mg maintenance dose of prasugrel for 7 days. Plasma concentration of its active metabolite, R-138727, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined on days 1 and 7 after dosing. Pharmacodynamic response to 20 µM of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry. RESULTS: A total of 47 subjects were enrolled (23 elderly, 24 non-elderly). There was no statistically significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between groups: area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time and maximum plasma concentration were about 174-175 ng·h/mL and 134-153 ng/mL, respectively, after the loading dose; and about 25-26 ng·h/mL and 25 ng/mL, respectively, after the maintenance dose. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was higher in the elderly subjects than in the non-elderly subjects, with a statistically significant difference from 24 h after the loading dose. No serious adverse events (bleeding or non-bleeding) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel (20-mg loading dose; 3.75-mg maintenance dose) produced a slight increase in antiplatelet efficacy in elderly compared with non-elderly subjects, despite no statistically significant difference in the pharmacokinetics.

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitory Effects and Pharmacokinetics of Prasugrel Used in Combination With Aspirin in Healthy Japanese Subjects.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel used in combination with aspirin in healthy Japanese subjects. All subjects received aspirin 100 mg/day. Subsequently, in the single-administration study, 23 subjects also received prasugrel 20 or 30 mg, and in the multiple-administration study, 20 subjects received a loading dose of prasugrel 20 or 30 mg on day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of prasugrel 5 or 7.5 mg/day, respectively, on days 2-5. In both studies, the plasma concentration of the active metabolite of prasugrel, R-138727, reached a maximum 0.5 hours after administration and rapidly decreased within 4 hours. In the single-administration study, the inhibitory effect on adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation was significantly higher in the prasugrel 20- and 30-mg groups than in the placebo group at all times (1-144 hours) after administration. In the multiple-administration study, a similar antiplatelet effect was found after both the loading dose and the maintenance dose and was maintained for 3-6 days after the last administration. There were study drug-related adverse events; however, all were mild, and none was clinically significant.

Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease: The OPTIMUS (Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus)-4 Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of atherothrombotic events, underscoring the importance of effective platelet inhibiting therapies. Prasugrel and ticagrelor reduce thrombotic complications to a greater extent than clopidogrel. Subgroup analyses of pivotal clinical trials testing prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel showed DM patients to have benefits that were consistent with the overall trial populations, although the magnitude of the ischemic risk reduction appeared to be enhanced with prasugrel. Whether these findings may be attributed to differences in the pharmacodynamic profiles of these drugs in DM patients remains poorly explored and represented the aim of this study. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover pharmacodynamic study, aspirin-treated DM patients (n=50) with coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to receive prasugrel (60 mg loading dose [LD]/10 mg maintenance dose once daily) or ticagrelor (180 mg LD/90 mg maintenance dose twice daily) for 1 week. Pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using 4 different assays, including VerifyNow P2Y12, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, light transmittance aggregometry, and Multiplate, which allowed us to explore ADP- and non-ADP-induced (arachidonic acid-, collagen-, thrombin receptor-activating, peptide-induced) platelet signaling pathways. The acute (baseline, 30 minutes, and 2 hours post-LD) and maintenance (1 week) effects of therapy were assessed. The primary end point of the study was the comparison of P2Y12 reaction units determined by VerifyNow P2Y12 at 1 week between prasugrel and ticagrelor. RESULTS: ADP- and non-ADP-induced measures of platelet reactivity reduced significantly with both prasugrel and ticagrelor LD and maintenance dose. P2Y12 reaction units defined by VerifyNow were similar between prasugrel and ticagrelor at 30 minutes and 2 hours post-LD. At 1 week, P2Y12 reaction units were significantly lower with ticagrelor than with prasugrel (52 [32-72] versus 83 [63-103]; least-square means difference: -31; 95% confidence interval, -57 to -4; P=0.022; primary end point). Pharmacodynamic assessments measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, light transmittance aggregometry, and Multiplate were similar between prasugrel and ticagrelor at each time point, including at 1 week. Rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were similar between groups with all assays at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: In DM patients with coronary artery disease, ticagrelor exerts similar or greater inhibition of ADP-induced platelet reactivity in comparison with prasugrel in the acute and chronic phases of treatment, whereas the inhibition of measures of non-ADP-induced platelet reactivity was not significantly different between the 2 agents. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852214.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral P2Y12 inhibitors during the acute phase of a myocardial infarction: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The immediate administration of oral antiplatelet therapy in the form of aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor is the universally recognised standard of care for patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. Despite strong recommendations for their use, there are a paucity of data describing their onset of action and clinical efficacy during the short time frames from confirmation of diagnosis to reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. OBJECTIVES: To complete a systematic review evaluating the currently available evidence regarding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic activity of orally administered clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor during the acute phase of a myocardial infarction in relation to mechanical reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases up to January 2016 using the terms outlined in our search strategy. RESULTS: Twelve papers were included in our final analysis; seven relating to pharmacodynamic studies, one to a pharmacokinetic study and four to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that despite the administration of oral P2Y12 inhibitors including newer more potent agents that should allow for greater and more consistent levels of platelet inhibition, the physiological state of ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) and the co-administration of opioid based analgesia are associated with a reduction in the degree of platelet inhibition achieved following their administration.

Prasugrel 5 mg inhibits platelet P-selectin and GPIIb-IIIa expression in very elderly and non elderly: results from the GENERATIONS trial, a pharmacodynamic study in stable CAD patients.

UNLABELLED: Platelet P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa) are markers of platelet activation and mediates platelet aggregation. Prasugrel (Pras) 5 mg may be used in very elderly (VE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI, but its effect on platelet P-selectin and activated GPIIb-IIIa in those patients is not known. Stable ACS patients, VE (78 ± 5 years, n = 23) and non-elderly (NE) (55 ± 5 years, n = 22) were randomized to Pras (5 or 10 mg) or clopidogrel (Clop) 75 mg during three 12-day periods. Platelet activation markers were measured by flow cytometry on unstimulated or stimulated (adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 20 µM) platelets, before and after each dosing period. RESULTS: At baseline there was no difference in platelet activation markers, either unstimulated or ADP-stimulated, between NE and VE. Pras 5 mg reduced both ADP-stimulated platelet P-selectin and activated GPIIb-IIIa in VE (p < 0.01 for both analyses) and NE (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Clop 75 mg had a similar effect as Pras 5 mg but did not significantly reduce activated GPIIb-IIIa in VE. Prasugrel 10 mg resulted in decreased platelet activation in both age groups compared to Clop 75 mg (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In VE and NE-patients, Pras 5 mg inhibited platelet P-selectin expression similar to Clop 75 mg and Pras 10 mg. Prasugrel 10 mg inhibited platelet P-selectin expression better than Clop 75 mg. Prasugrel 10 mg and 5 mg, but not Clop 75 mg, significantly inhibited activated GPIIb-IIIa in VE. This platelet reactivity data support the use of Pras 5 mg for VE patients.

On-treatment platelet reactivity: State of the art and perspectives.

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HcPR) during dual-antiplatelet therapy is a marker of vascular risk, in particular stent thrombosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Genetic determinants (CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), advanced age, female gender, diabetes and reduced ventricular function are related to a higher risk to develop HcPR. In addition, inflammation and increased platelet turnover, as revealed by the elevated percentage of reticulated platelets in patients' blood, that characterize the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes, are associated with HcPR. To overcome the limitation of clopidogrel, new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) were developed and the demonstration of their superiority over clopidogrel was obtained in the two randomized trials, TRITON TIMI 38 and PLATO. Emerging evidence is accumulating on the role of high-on aspirin platelet reactivity (HaPR), especially in the clinical context of diabetes. Finally, the presence of new, potent antiplatelet drugs has shifted the focus from thrombotic to bleeding risk. Recent data document that low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) is associated with a significantly higher bleeding risk. Due to the current possibility to choose between multiple antiplatelet strategies, the future perspective is to include in the management of ACS, in addition to clinical data and classical risk factors, the definition of platelet function during treatment in order to set a tailored therapy.

Morphine interaction with prasugrel: a double-blind, cross-over trial in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Morphine decreases the concentrations and effects of clopidogrel, which could lead to treatment failure in myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVES: To clarify whether more potent P2Y12-inhibitors may provide an effective alternative, we examined drug-drug interactions between morphine and prasugrel. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers received 60 mg prasugrel with placebo or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Pharmacokinetics were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and prasugrel effects were measured by platelet function tests. RESULTS: Morphine neither diminished total drug exposure (AUC), which was the primary endpoint, nor significantly delayed drug absorption of prasugrel. However, morphine reduced maximal plasma concentrations (C max) of prasugrel active metabolite by 31 % (p = 0.019). Morphine slightly, but not significantly, delayed the onset of maximal inhibition of platelet plug formation under high shear rates (30 vs. 20 min). Whole blood aggregation was not influenced. CONCLUSIONS: Although morphine significantly decreases the maximal plasma concentrations of prasugrel active metabolite, it does not diminish its effects on platelets to a clinically relevant degree in healthy volunteers. However, it should be considered that the observed decrease in C max of prasugrel active metabolite caused by morphine co-administration may gain relevance in STEMI patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01369186, EUDRA-CT#: 2010-023761-22.

Developments in Oral Antiplatelet Agents for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, and Ticagrelor.

A review of the literature was conducted for clinical trials evaluating the antiplatelet P2Y12 receptor antagonists, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, as well as the guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or myocardial infarction. Clinical guidelines recommend that patients with ACS be treated with dual oral antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. The selection of an appropriate antiplatelet agent depends on the treatment approach and a patient's bleeding risk and clinical history. With respect to antiplatelet activity, prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate greater potency and less interpatient variability than clopidogrel. In phase III clinical trials, prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced the incidence of ischemic events in patients with ACS compared with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were associated with a similar risk of major bleeding, whereas patients receiving prasugrel had an increased risk of major bleeding versus those receiving clopidogrel. Pharmacists can provide guidance on the appropriate use of antiplatelet agents as well as the use of concomitant medications, while being vigilant for any potential drug interactions.

Evidence-Based Choice of P2Y12 Inhibitors in End Stage Renal Disease Patients: A Mini-Review.

Chronic kidney disease has been identified as an independent cardiovascular risk factor. The morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease are higher among chronic kidney disease patients when compared with patients with normal kidney function. Although P2Y12 inhibitors (eg. clopidogrel) are associated with increased survival rates after a myocardial infarction, most of the clinical trials excluded End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients. Besides, non-responders to P2Y12 inhibitors have been identified as at risk of cardiovascular adverse events and non-responder prevalence is higher among ESRD than in any other population. Recent data questioned the benefits from P2Y12 inhibitors among chronic kidney disease patients. This systematic review aimed to describe pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) evidence data among 3 widely prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors. Clopidogrel and prasugrel are bioactivated by the cytochromes P450 (CYP) while ticagrelor is already active. PD data used different assays among which the VerifyNow® which showed intravariability before and after dialysis. The potential explanation of modulated PK/PD parameters among ESRD patients will be addressed. Absorption as well as metabolism is diminished in ESRD patients. It could potentially lead to absence of clopidogrel or prasugrel bioactivation or ticagrelor accumulation. Evidence-based recommendation regarding the best option for antiaggregation secondary to percutaneous intervention in this high risk population is still lacking.