Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 94
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(11): e078407, 2023 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38035739

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate if and how the panorama of acute cholecystitis changed in 2020 in Sweden. Seven aspects were identified, the incidence of cholecystitis, the Tokyo grade, the timing of diagnosis and treatment, the proportion treated with early surgery, the proportion of patients treated with delayed surgery, and new complications from gallstones. DESIGN: Retrospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: 3 hospitals in Sweden, covering 675 000 inhabitants. PARTICIPANTS: 1634 patients with cholecystitis. OUTCOMES: The incidence, treatment choice and diagnostic and treatment delay were investigated by comparing prepandemic and pandemic patients. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with cholecystitis during the pandemic were more comorbid (American Society of Anesthesiologists 2-5, 86% vs 81%, p=0.01) and more often had a diagnostic CT (67% vs 59%, p=0.01). There were variations in the number of patients corresponding with the pandemic waves, but there was no overall increase in the number of patients with cholecystitis (78 vs 76 cases/100 000 inhabitants, p=0.7) or the proportion of patients treated with surgery during the pandemic (50% vs 50%, p=0.4). There was no increase in time to admission from symptoms (both median 1 day, p=0.7), or surgery from admission (both median 1 day, p=0.9). The proportion of grades 2-3 cholecystitis was not higher during the pandemic (46% vs 44%, p=0.9). The median time to elective surgery increased (184 days vs 130 days, p=0.04), but there was no increase in new gallstone complications (35% vs 39%, p=0.3). CONCLUSION: Emergency surgery for cholecystitis was not impacted by the pandemic in Sweden. Patients were more comorbid but did not have more severe cholecystitis nor was there a delay in seeking care. Fewer patients non-operatively managed had elective surgery within 6 months of their initial diagnosis but there was no corresponding increase in gallstone complications.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistite Aguda , Colecistite , Cálculos Biliares , Humanos , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Pandemias , Suécia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Colecistite/epidemiologia , Colecistite/cirurgia
2.
BJS Open ; 7(4)2023 07 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37578027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common diagnoses presenting to emergency general surgery and is managed either operatively or conservatively. However, operative rates vary widely across the world. This real-world population analysis aimed to describe the current clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis across Scotland, UK. METHODS: This was a national cohort study using data obtained from Information Services Division, Scotland. All adult patients with the admission diagnostic code for acute cholecystitis were included. Data were used to identify all patients admitted to Scottish hospitals between 1997 and 2019 and outcomes tracked for inpatients or after discharge through the unique patient identifier. This was linked to death data, including date of death. RESULTS: A total of 47 558 patients were diagnosed with 58 824 episodes of acute cholecystitis (with 27.2 per cent of patients experiencing more than one episode) in 46 Scottish hospitals. Median age was 58 years (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 43-71), 64.4 per cent were female, and most (76.1 per cent) had no comorbidities. A total of 28 741 (60.4 per cent) patients had an operative intervention during the index admission. Patients who had an operation during their index admission had a lower risk of 90-day mortality compared with non-operative management (OR 0.62, 95% c.i. 0.55-0.70). CONCLUSION: In this study, 60 per cent of patients had an index cholecystectomy. Patients who underwent surgery had a better survival rate compared with those managed conservatively, further advocating for an operative approach in this cohort.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda , Gerenciamento Clínico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Colecistectomia/normas , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/mortalidade , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Escócia , Idoso , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(10): 4504-4509, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37259731

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether there is a relationship between blood fibrinogen levels during hospitalization of patients hospitalized for conservative treatment due to acute cholecystitis (AC) in our clinic. Patients underwent surgery and were discharged with medical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The files of 118 patients who were hospitalized due to the diagnosis of AC and planned for conservative medical treatment in our clinic between January 2018 and February 2020 were recorded, prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as those who responded to conservative treatment (Group 1), and those who were operated urgently despite conservative treatment (Group 2). Increase in gallbladder wall thickness, presence of pericholecystic fluid and hydrops sac on ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) were considered significant for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Blood fibrinogen levels were measured in all patients during hospitalization. RESULTS: The mean age of 118 patients included in the study was 58.32 (19-96) years. There were 77 patients in Group 1 and 41 patients in Group 2. Serum fibrinogen level was found to be 298.34±111.7 mg/dl in Group 1 and 637±124.5 mg/dl in Group 2, and a statistically significant difference was found (p<0.001). When the cut-off value for the fibrinogen level was taken as 564.50 mg/dl, the sensitivity and specificity of the test were found to be 75.6% and 61%, respectively in showing surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of our study, we concluded that when the data obtained are evaluated, it should be kept in mind that despite medical treatment, there is an urgent need for an operation in patients with acute cholecystitis, and in patients with high plasma fibrinogen level (cut-off) at first admission.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Fibrinogênio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
4.
Rev Med Suisse ; 19(831): 1175-1179, 2023 Jun 14.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37314256

RESUMO

Acute cholecystitis is an inflammation of the gallbladder most often related to gallstones. The diagnostic and severity criteria are well described by the Tokyo criteria. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the treatment of choice. It can also be performed in elderly patients and in pregnant women during any trimester. For patients not eligible for surgery, percutaneous or echo-endoscopic gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are effective treatment alternatives. The management of acute cholecystitis must therefore be adapted to each patient by carefully evaluating the risks and benefits associated with surgery.


La cholécystite aiguë est une inflammation de la vésicule biliaire le plus souvent liée à des calculs biliaires. Les critères diagnostiques et de sévérité sont bien décrits par les critères de Tokyo. La cholécystectomie laparoscopique précoce reste le traitement de choix. Elle peut être également réalisée chez les patients âgés et chez les femmes enceintes pendant n'importe quel trimestre. Pour les patients non éligibles à la chirurgie, les drainages de la vésicule biliaire par voie percutanée ou échoendoscopique (EUS-GBD) sont des alternatives thérapeutiques efficaces. La prise en charge de la cholécystite aiguë doit donc être adaptée à chaque patient en évaluant de façon attentive les risques et bénéfices associés à la chirurgie.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistite Aguda , Cálculos Biliares , Gravidez , Idoso , Humanos , Feminino , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Inflamação , Drenagem , Cálculos Biliares/complicações , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico , Cálculos Biliares/terapia
5.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 73(5): 1106-1107, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37218244

RESUMO

Pseudo aneurysm of cystic artery is an extremely rare complication which may occur in association with cholecystitis, liver biopsy, biliary interventions, pancreatitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We report the case of a 55 years old male patient who presented with complaint of right upper quadrant pain, haematemesis and melena, he underwent CT scan abdomen that revealed perforated gall bladder with cystic artery pseudo aneurysm secondary to acute cholecystitis. An angiogram was performed that confirmed small cystic artery pseudo aneurysm. Selective embolisation of cystic artery was done, resulting in complete exclusion of pseudo aneurysm. The patient recovered completely.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma , Aneurisma , Colecistite Aguda , Colecistite , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistite Aguda/etiologia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Falso Aneurisma/terapia , Colecistite/complicações , Colecistite/terapia , Artéria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem
6.
Orv Hetil ; 164(20): 770-787, 2023 May 21.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210716

RESUMO

In developed countries, diseases of the gallbladder and the biliary tract count as some of the most frequent gastrointestinal disorders. The inflammation of the gallbladder/biliary tree is a potentially severe, even lethal condition that requires rapid diagnosis and early multidisciplinary approach to be treated. Although the frequency of these diseases is high, the treatment is not unified in Hungary yet. The aim of the evidence-based recommendation is to clarify the diagnostic criteria and severity grading of these diseases and to highlight the indications and rules of proper application of the numerous available therapeutic interventions. The recent guideline is based on the consensus of the Board members of the Endoscopic Section of the Hungarian Gastroenterology Society in contribution with renown experts of surgery, infectology as well as interventional radiology and it counts as a clear and easy applicable guide during the all-day healthcare practice. Our guidelines are based on Tokyo guidelines established on the basis of the consensus reached in the International Consensus Meeting held in Tokyo which were revised in 2013 (TG13) and in 2018 (TG18). Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(20): 770-787.


Assuntos
Colangite , Colecistite Aguda , Colecistite , Humanos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Doença Aguda , Colangite/diagnóstico , Colangite/terapia , Tóquio
7.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 101(3): 170-179, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36108956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To challenge the risk factors described in Tokyo Guidelines in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis. METHODS: Retrospective single center cohort study with 963 patients with Acute Cholecystitis during a period of 5 years. Some 725 patients with a "pure" Acute Calculous Cholecystitis were selected. The analysis included 166 variables encompassing all risk factors described in Tokyo Guidelines. The Propensity Score Matching method selected two subgroups of patients with equal comorbidities, to compare the severe complications rate according to the initial treatment (Surgical vs Non-Surgical). We analyzed the Failure-to-rescue as a quality indicator in the treatment of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis. RESULTS: the median age was 69 years (IQR 53-80). 85.1% of the patients were ASA II or III. The grade of the Acute Calculous Cholecystitis was mild in a 21%, moderate in 39% and severe in 40% of the patients. Cholecystectomy was performed in 95% of the patients. The overall complications rate was 43% and the mortality was 3.6%. The Logistic Regression model isolated 3 risk factor for severe complication: ASA > II, cancer without metastases and moderate to severe renal disease. The Failure-to-Rescue (8%) was higher in patients with non-surgical treatment (32% vs. 7%; P = 0.002). After Propensity Score Matching, the number of severe complications was similar between Surgical and Non-Surgical treatment groups (48.5% vs 62.5%; P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: the recommended treatment for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis is the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Only three risk factors from the Tokyo Guidelines list appeared as independent predictors of severe complications. The failure-to-rescue is higher in non-surgically treated patients.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda , Colecistostomia , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Tóquio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colecistostomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Colecistite Aguda/terapia
8.
Rev. méd. Urug ; 38(3): e38307, sept. 2022.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BNUY | ID: biblio-1409863

RESUMO

Resumen: Introducción: el tratamiento "gold standard" de la colecistitis aguda es la colecistectomía laparoscópica temprana. En pacientes añosos de alto riesgo anestésico-quirúrgico, con cuadros de evolución subaguda y/o con repercusión sistémica, es alternativa el tratamiento médico exclusivo o asociado al drenaje vesicular percutáneo. Objetivo: analizar y comparar las recomendaciones internacionales con las conductas terapéuticas en dos centros asistenciales de tercer nivel para pacientes con colecistitis aguda. Método: trabajo descriptivo, prospectivo de 161 pacientes con colecistitis aguda litiásica asistidos en los departamentos de emergencia del Hospital de Clínicas y el Hospital Español entre mayo de 2018 y mayo de 2019. Resultados: la colecistectomía laparoscópica temprana fue indicada en el 88% de los pacientes, con 3% de conversión y 9% de morbilidad. 12% recibieron manejo no operatorio, asociándose en el 65% colecistostomía percutánea. La edad avanzada, comorbilidades, discrasias y la severidad del cuadro presentaron asociación significativa con la modalidad terapéutica (p <0,05). El 40% de los pacientes en los que se realizó manejo no operatorio presentó recurrencias sintomáticas. A todos se les realizó la colecistectomía en diferido. Conclusiones: la colecistectomía laparoscópica temprana es la conducta terapéutica más frecuente. Las principales indicaciones de manejo no operatorio en nuestro medio son las características sistémicas desfavorables. El mismo presenta altas tasas de éxito y escasa morbilidad con una recurrencia sintomática del 40%.


Abstract: Introduction: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. However, exclusive medical treatment (EMC) or medical treatment associated with percutaneous gallbladder drainage is the treatment of choice in elderly patients given their high surgical and anesthetic risk and upon the subacute course of the condition and/or its systemic repercussions. Objective: to analyze and compare international guidelines to the therapeutic behavior for patients with acute cholecystectomy in two third-level hospitals. Methodology: descriptive, prospective study of 161 patients with litiasic acute cholecystitis treated in the ER of Hospital de Clínicas and Hospital Español between May 2018 and May 2019. Results: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy was indicated in 88% of patients, conversion being 3% and morbidity 9%. Twelve percent of patients received non-surgical treatment, 65% of which evidenced percutaneous cholecystostomy. Old age, comorbidities, dyscrasias, and severity of the condition were closely related to the therapeutic modality (p < 0.05). Forty percent of patients who received non-surgical treatment presented symptomatic repercussions. They all underwent delayed cholecystectomy. Conclusions: early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most frequent treatment of choice. Unfavorable systemic characteristics are the main indications for non-surgical management in our country. This surgical treatment evidences high success rates and scarce morbidity with 40% of systemic repercussions.


Resumo: Introdução: o tratamento padrão ouro da colecistite aguda é a colecistectomia laparoscópica precoce. Em pacientes idosos com alto risco anestésico-cirúrgico, com evolução subaguda e/ou repercussão sistêmica, o tratamento clínico isolado ou associado à drenagem percutânea da vesícula biliar é uma alternativa. Objetivo: analisar e comparar recomendações internacionais com condutas terapêuticas em dois centros terciários para pacientes com colecistite aguda. Método: estudo descritivo e prospectivo de 161 pacientes com colecistite aguda de cálculos atendidos nos serviços de emergência do Hospital de Clínicas e Hospital Español no período maio de 2018 - maio de 2019. Resultados: a colecistectomia laparoscópica precoce foi indicada em 88% dos pacientes, com 3% de conversão e 9% de morbidade. 12% receberam tratamento não operatório, associado a 65% colecistostomia percutânea. Idade avançada, comorbidades, discrasias e gravidade do quadro apresentaram associação significativa com a modalidade terapêutica (p < 0,05). 40% dos pacientes nos quais o manejo não operatório foi realizado apresentaram recidivas sintomáticas. Todos foram submetidos à colecistectomia diferida. Conclusões: a colecistectomia laparoscópica precoce é a abordagem terapêutica mais frequente. As principais indicações para o manejo não operatório em nosso meio são as características sistêmicas desfavoráveis. Apresentando altas taxas de sucesso e baixa morbidade com recorrência sintomática de 40%.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Recidiva , Estudos Prospectivos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia
9.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 24(5): 306-309, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35598054

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems worldwide. The fear of seeking medical attention to avoid the possibility of being infected may have altered the course of some diseases. OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with the management of patients with acute cholecystitis during the pandemic at our medical center. METHODS: We compared patients treated for acute cholecystitis between 1 March and 31 August 2020 (Group I) to patients admitted with the same diagnosis during the same months in 2019 (Group II). We evaluated demographics, presenting symptoms, laboratory and imaging findings at presentation, the disease's clinical course, management, and outcome. RESULTS: Group I consisted of 101 patients and group II included 94 patients. No differences were noted for age (66 years, IQR 48-78 vs. 66 years, IQR 47-76; P = 0.50) and sex (57.4% vs. 51.1% females; P = 0.39) between the two groups. The delay between symptom onset and hospital admission was longer for Group I patients (3 days, IQR 2-7 vs. 2 days, IQR 1-3; P = 0.002). Moderate to severe disease was more commonly encountered in Group I (59.4% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.003). Group I patients more often failed conservative management (36% vs. 6%, P = 0.001) and had a higher conversion rate to open surgery (15.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic more often presented late to the emergency department and more showed adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Colecistite Aguda , Idoso , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/epidemiologia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Surgery ; 171(3): 785-792, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accountable care organizations through the Affordable Care Act are to improve Medicare beneficiaries' health while reducing costs. We hypothesize that this model may shift care, disease burden, and costs to nonaffiliated hospital facilities in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: A retrospective difference-in-differences analysis was performed to compare severity, postoperative complications, diagnostic modality, length of stay, and costs in patients with acute cholecystitis from a post-accountable care organization implementation period (January 2014 through December 2015) to a pre-accountable care organization period (January 2011 through December 2012). RESULTS: Analysis of 400 patients with acute cholecystitis revealed the post-accountable care organization patients had significantly (P < .0001) higher disease severity (14.4% vs 8.4%), emergency admissions (90.1 vs 74.2%), computed tomography scans (55.5% vs 27.8%), prolonged length of stay (5.2 vs 3.9 days), and a 30% (P < .0003) increase in total costs. CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the introduction of accountable care organizations resulted in a higher morbidity, more emergency admissions, more extensive management, a prolonged length of stay, and increased cost in patients with acute cholecystitis. These data support the position that accountable care organizations may shift costs from the primary care setting to nonaffiliated accountable care organization hospitals, provide a lesser level of care, and thus potentially failing their primary mandates.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Texas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
World J Emerg Surg ; 16(1): 24, 2021 05 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975601

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is the second most frequent surgical condition in emergency departments. The recommended treatment is the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; however, the Tokyo Guidelines (TG) advocate for different initial treatments in some subgroups of patients without a strong evidence that all patients will benefit from them. There is no clear consensus in the literature about who is the unfit patient for surgical treatment. The primary aim of the study is to identify the risk factors for mortality in ACC and compare them with Tokyo Guidelines (TG) classification. METHODS: Retrospective unicentric cohort study of patients emergently admitted with and ACC during 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2016. The study comprised 963 patients. Primary outcome was the mortality after the diagnosis. A propensity score method was used to avoid confounding factors comparing surgical treatment and non-surgical treatment. RESULTS: The overall mortality was 3.6%. Mortality was associated with older age (68 + IQR 27 vs. 83 + IQR 5.5; P = 0.001) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.5 + 5.3 vs. 0+2; P = 0.001). A logistic regression model isolated four mortality risk factors (ACME): chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.66 95% CI 1.7-12.8 P = 0.001), dementia (OR 4.12; 95% CI 1.34-12.7, P = 0.001), age > 80 years (OR 1.12: 95% CI 1.02-1.21, P = 0.001) and the need of preoperative vasoactive amines (OR 9.9: 95% CI 3.5-28.3, P = 0.001) which predicted the mortality in a 92% of the patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area of 88% significantly higher that 68% (P = 0.003) from the TG classification. When comparing subgroups selected using propensity score matching with the same morbidity and severity of ACC, mortality was higher in the non-surgical treatment group. (26.2% vs. 10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was higher in ACC patients treated with non-surgical treatment. ACME identifies high-risk patients. The validation to ACME with a prospective multicenter study population could allow us to create a new alternative guideline to TG for treating ACC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered and recorded in Clinical Trials. NCT04744441.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/mortalidade , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Medição de Risco , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia
12.
J Radiol Case Rep ; 15(2): 25-34, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33717408

RESUMO

Hemorrhagic cholecystitis is a potentially deadly and difficult to recognize entity. It is associated with cystic artery pseudoaneurysm and is usually seen in the setting of acute calculous cholecystitis. We report two cases of hemorrhagic cholecystitis with arteriographic findings of cystic artery pseudoaneurysms that were successfully embolized using microcoils, facilitating subsequent cholecystectomy. Both cases had unusual presentations of gallbladder rupture with hemoperitoneum, the latter of which was atypical occurring in the absence of gallstones. We believe when hemorrhagic cholecystitis is suspected, a two-step therapeutic approach should be employed with embolization of the bleeding cystic artery followed by cholecystectomy. A comprehensive literature review and discussion of hemorrhagic cholecystitis will be provided.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemoperitônio/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Angiografia , Colecistectomia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica , Hemoperitônio/terapia , Humanos , Masculino
13.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 47(3): 683-692, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742223

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyse acute cholecystitis (AC) management during the first pandemic outbreak after the recommendations given by the surgical societies estimating: morbidity, length of hospital stay, mortality and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. METHODS: Multicentre-combined (retrospective-prospective) cohort study with AC patients in the Community of Madrid between 1st March and 30th May 2020. 257 AC patients were involved in 16 public hospital. Multivariant binomial logistic regression (MBLR) was applied to mortality. RESULTS: Of COVID-19 patients, 30 were diagnosed at admission and 12 patients were diagnosed during de admission or 30 days after discharge. In non-COVID-19 patients, antibiotic therapy was received in 61.3% of grade I AC and 40.6% of grade II AC. 52.4% of grade III AC were treated with percutaneous drainage (PD). Median hospital stay was 5 [3-8] days, which was higher in the non-surgical treatment group with 7.51 days (p < 0.001) and a 3.25% of mortality rate (p < 0.21). 93.3% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection at admission were treated with non-surgical treatment (p = 0.03), median hospital stay was 11.0 [7.5-27.5] days (p < 0.001) with a 7.5% of mortality rate (p > 0.05). In patients with hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection, 91.7% of grade I-II AC were treated with non-surgical treatment (p = 0.037), with a median hospital stay of 16 [4-21] days and a 18.2% mortality rate (p > 0.05). Hospital-acquired infection risk when hospital stay is > 7 days is OR 4.7, CI 95% (1.3-16.6), p = 0.009. COVID-19 mortality rate was 11.9%, AC severity adjusted OR 5.64 (CI 95% 1.417-22.64). In MBLR analysis, age (OR 1.15, CI 95% 1.02-1.31), SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 14.49, CI 95% 1.33-157.81), conservative treatment failure (OR 8.2, CI 95% 1.34-50.49) and AC severity were associated with an increased odd of mortality. CONCLUSION: In our population, during COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase of non-surgical treatment which was accompanied by an increase of conservative treatment failure, morbidity and hospital stay length which may have led to an increased risk hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Age, SARS-CoV-2 infection, AC severity and conservative treatment failure were mortality risk factors.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19 , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistite Aguda , Tratamento Conservador , Infecção Hospitalar , Controle de Infecções , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico , Colecistite Aguda/epidemiologia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Drenagem/métodos , Drenagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/normas , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia
14.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 91(1): 219-225, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33605704

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) in the frail geriatric population is underexplored. The aim of our study was to examine long-term outcomes of frail geriatric patients with ACC treated with cholecystectomy compared with initial nonoperative management. METHODS: We conducted a 2017 analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database and included frail geriatric (≥65 years) patients with ACC. Frailty was assessed using the five-factor modified frailty index. Patients were stratified into those undergoing cholecystectomy at index admission (operative management [OP]) versus those managed with nonoperative intervention (nonoperative management [NOP]). The NOP group was further subdivided into those who received antibiotics only and those who received percutaneous drainage. Primary outcomes were procedure-related complications in the OP group and 6-month failure of NOP (readmission with cholecystitis). Secondary outcomes were mortality and overall hospital length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 53,412 geriatric patients with ACC were identified, 51.0% of whom were frail: 16,791 (61.6%) in OP group and 10,472 (38.4%) in NOP group (3,256 had percutaneous drainage, 7,216 received antibiotics only). Patients were comparable in age (76 ± 7 vs. 77 ± 8 years; p = 0.082) and modified frailty index (0.47 vs. 0.48; p = 0.132). Procedure-related complications in the OP group were 9.3%, and 6-month failure of NOP was 18.9%. Median time to failure of NOP management was 36 days (range, 12-78 days). Mortality was higher in the frail NOP group (5.2 vs. 3.2%; p < 0.001). The NOP group had more days of hospitalization (8 [4-15] vs. 5 [3-10]; p < 0.001). Both receiving antibiotics only (odds ratio, 1.6 [1.3-2.0]; p < 0.001) and receiving percutaneous drainage (odds ratio, 1.9 [1.7-2.2]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: One in five patients failed NOP and subsequently had complicated hospital stays. Nonoperative management of frail elderly ACC patients may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Colelitíase/terapia , Idoso Fragilizado , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colecistite Aguda/etiologia , Colelitíase/complicações , Bases de Dados Factuais , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidade/tendências , Análise Multivariada , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Sobrevida , Falha de Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 2969, 2021 02 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33536564

RESUMO

With the progression of acute cholecystitis, antimicrobial therapy becomes important for infection control. Current antibiotic recommendations were mostly based on reports of patients with acute cholangitis whose bile specimens were sampled from the biliary tract. However, as most infections of acute cholecystitis are limited to the gallbladder, direct sampling from the site increases the probability of identifying the causative pathogen. We investigated 321 positive bile cultures from 931 patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2003 and December 2017. The frequency of enterococci declined (P = 0.041), whereas that of Enterobacteriales (P = 0.005), particularly Escherichia (P = 0.008), increased over time. The incidence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriales showed a significant increasing trend (P = 0.031). Vancomycin-resistant E.faecium, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales were recently observed. In grade I and II acute cholecystitis, there were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes in patients with and without early appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In conclusion, the changing incidence of frequently isolated microorganisms and their antibiotic resistance over time would be considered before selecting antibiotics for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Surgery might be a crucial component of infection control in grade I and II acute cholecystitis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bile/microbiologia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Colelitíase/terapia , Vesícula Biliar/microbiologia , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistite Aguda/microbiologia , Colelitíase/complicações , Colelitíase/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Ann Surg ; 274(2): 367-374, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567508

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between patients who undergo cholecystectomy following index admission for cholecystitis, and those who are managed nonoperatively. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Index emergency cholecystectomy following acute cholecystitis is widely recommended by national guidelines, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Data collected routinely from the Hospital Episode Statistics database (all admissions to National Health Service organizations in England and Wales) were extracted between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2015. Analyses were limited to patients aged over 18 years with a primary diagnosis of cholecystitis. Exclusions included records with missing or invalid datasets, patients who had previously undergone a cholecystectomy, patients who had died without a cholecystectomy, and those undergoing cholecystectomy for malignancy, pancreatitis, or choledocholithiasis. Patients were grouped as either "no cholecystectomy" where they had never undergone a cholecystectomy following discharge, or "cholecystectomy." The latter group was then subdivided as "emergency cholecystectomy" when cholecystectomy was performed during their index emergency admission, or "interval cholecystectomy" when a cholecystectomy was performed within 12 months following a subsequent (emergency or elective) admission. Propensity Score Matching was used to match emergency and interval cholecystectomy groups. Main outcome measures included 1) One-year total length of hospital stay due to biliary causes following an index emergency admission with cholecystitis. 2) One-year mortality; defined as death occurring within 1 year following the index emergency admission with acute cholecystitis. RESULTS: Of the 99,139 patients admitted as an emergency with acute cholecystitis, 51.1% (47,626) did not undergo a cholecystectomy within 1 year of index admission. These patients were older, with more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Score ≥ 5 in 23.5% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.001) when compared to patients who did have a cholecystectomy. While all-cause 1-year mortality was higher in the nonoperated versus the operated group (12.2% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.001), gallbladder-related deaths were significantly lower than all other causes of death in the non-operated group (3.3% vs. 8.9%, P < 0.001). Following matching, 1-year total hospital admission time was significantly higher following emergency compared with interval cholecystectomy (17.7 d vs. 13 d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of patients in England did not undergo cholecystectomy following index admission for acute cholecystitis. Mortality was higher in the nonoperated group, which was mostly due to non-gallbladder pathologies but total hospital admission time for biliary causes was lower over 12 months. Increasing the numbers of emergency cholecystectomy may risk over-treating patients with acute cholecystitis and increasing their time spent admitted to hospital.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Tratamento Conservador , Colecistite Aguda/mortalidade , Emergências , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina Estatal , País de Gales/epidemiologia
17.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(5): 1425-1435, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588249

RESUMO

The mainstay of management of acute cholecystitis has been surgical, with percutaneous gallbladder drainage in patients deemed high risk for surgical intervention. Endoscopic management of acute cholecytitis with transpapillary and transmural drainage of the gall bladder is emerging as a viable alternative in high-risk surgical patients. In this article, we discuss the background, current status, technical challenges and strategies to overcome them, adverse events, and outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Drenagem , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistite Aguda/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/economia , Drenagem/instrumentação , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/economia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/instrumentação , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA