Cost-Consequences Analysis of Increased Utilization of Triple-Chamber-Bag Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Neonates in Seven European Countries.

The safety of parenteral nutrition (PN) remains a concern in preterm neonates, impacting clinical outcomes and health-care-resource use and costs. This cost-consequence analysis assessed national-level impacts of a 10-percentage point increase in use of industry-prepared three-chamber bags (3CBs) on clinical outcomes, healthcare resources, and hospital budgets across seven European countries. A ten-percentage-point 3CB use-increase model was developed for Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the UK. The cost-consequence analysis estimated the impact on compounding error harm and bloodstream infection (BSI) rates, staff time, and annual hospital budget. Of 265,000 (52%) preterm neonates, 133,000 (52%) were estimated to require PN. Baseline compounding methods were estimated as 43% pharmacy manual, 16% pharmacy automated, 22% ward, 9% outsourced, 3% industry provided non-3CBs, and 7% 3CBs. A modeled increased 3CB use would change these values to 39%, 15%, 18%, 9%, 3%, and 17%, respectively. Modeled consequences included -11.6% for harm due to compounding errors and -2.7% for BSIs. Labor time saved would equate to 41 specialized nurses, 29 senior pharmacists, 26 pharmacy assistants, and 22 senior pediatricians working full time. Budget impact would be a €8,960,601 (3.4%) fall from €260,329,814 to €251,369,212. Even a small increase in the use of 3CBs in preterm neonates could substantially improve neonatal clinical outcomes, and provide notable resource and cost savings to hospitals.

Construction situation, costs and charges associated with pharmacy intravenous admixture services: multi-center cross-sectional survey based on 137 medical institutions in mainland China.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the construction situation, costs and charges associated with pharmacy intravenous admixture services (PIVAS) to provide references for the construction and development of PIVAS in mainland China. METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted via a WeChat Group targeting PIVAS leaders in hospitals to investigate the basic situation of PIVAS, including opening time, area, number of PIVAS, equipment, management mode, PIVAS costs and charges, as well as numbers of beds, open wards, and staff, and analyze differences in PIVAS construction at different provincial and hospital levels. RESULTS: 137 questionnaires were collected from 29 provinces, representing a response rate of 99.3%. Most participants (88.4%) were from Level III Hospitals. The number of years of operations of PIVAS ranged from 1 to 22 (median: 6). PIVAS site area ranged between 100 and 1973 m2; daily average infusion volume was concentrated in the ranges 0-1000 bags (29.9%, 41/137) and 1001-2000 bags (26.3%, 36/137). In terms of PIVAS management mode, the vast majority used separate pharmacy management (65.0%, 89/137). Only 52.6% (72/137) of PIVAS have standardized charges, and 70.1% (96/137) operate at a loss. The median costs of mixed tumor chemotherapy drugs, total parenteral nutrition, general medicine, antibiotics were 20, 35, 4 and 5 RMB, respectively. With the exception of a few features, PIVAS construction does not obviously differ among different regions and hospital levels. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, PIVAS in China has developed rapidly and become relatively large. The main problems are that most provinces lack standards for charges and PIVAS construction differs among hospitals. Therefore, standards for PIVAS construction and charges should be developed to provide a reference for the future development of PIVAS.

Transferosomes as nanocarriers for drugs across the skin: Quality by design from lab to industrial scale.

Transferosomes, also known as transfersomes, are ultradeformable vesicles for transdermal applications consisting of a lipid bilayer with phospholipids and an edge activator and an ethanol/aqueous core. Depending on the lipophilicity of the active substance, it can be encapsulated within the core or amongst the lipid bilayer. Compared to liposomes, transferosomes are able to reach intact deeper regions of the skin after topical administration delivering higher concentrations of active substances making them a successful drug delivery carrier for transdermal applications. Most transferosomes contain phosphatidylcholine (C18) as it is the most abundant lipid component of the cell membrane, and hence, it is highly tolerated for the skin, decreasing the risk of undesirable effects, such as hypersensitive reactions. The most common edge activators are surfactants such as sodium deoxycholate, Tween® 80 and Span® 80. Their chain length is optimal for intercalation within the C18 phospholipid bilayer. A wide variety of drugs has been successfully encapsulated within transferosomes such as phytocompounds like sinomenine or apigenin for rheumatoid arthritis and leukaemia respectively, small hydrophobic drugs but also macromolecules like insulin. The main factors to develop optimal transferosomal formulations (with high drug loading and nanometric size) are the optimal ratio between the main components as well as the critical process parameters for their manufacture. Application of quality by design (QbD), specifically design of experiments (DoE), is crucial to understand the interplay among all these factors not only during the preparation at lab scale but also in the scale-up process. Clinical trials of a licensed topical ketoprofen transferosomal gel have shown promising results in the alleviation of symptons in orthreothritis with non-severe skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. However, the product was withdrawn from the market which probably was related to the higher cost of the medicine linked to the expensive manufacturing process required in the production of transferosomes compared to other conventional gel formulations. This example brings out the need for a careful formulation design to exploit the best properties of this drug delivery system as well as the development of manufacturing processes easily scalable at industrial level.

Technology for Triple Fortification of Salt with Folic Acid, Iron, and Iodine.

As many of the maternal and child health complications result from folic acid, iron, and iodine deficiencies; it makes sense to combat these simultaneously. We have developed cost-effective technology to deliver these three micronutrients simultaneously through salt. Our goal was to retain at least 70% of the micronutrients during 6 months of storage. The fortified salt was formulated by spraying a solution that contained 2% iodine and 0.5% or 1% folic acid onto salt and adding encapsulated ferrous fumarate. The formulated triple fortified salt contained 1,000 ppm iron, 50 ppm iodine, and 12.5 or 25 ppm folic acid. The spray solution and the salt were stored for 2 and 6 months respectively at 25, 35, and 45 °C 60 to 70% relative humidity. Even at 45 °C, over 70% of both iodine and folic acid were retained in the salt. The best formulation based on the color of the salt and stability of iodine and folic acid contained 12.5 ppm folic acid, 50 ppm iodine, and 1,000 ppm iron. These results indicate that iron, iodine, and folic acid can be simultaneously delivered to a vulnerable population through salt using the technology described. Also, the quality control of the process can be developed around pteroic acid that was detected as a primary degradation product of folic acid. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The technology developed is already transferred to India for industrial scale up. When fully operational, the technology will simultaneously solve iron, iodine, and folic acid deficiencies in vulnerable populations at a very low cost.

Nanostructured cochleates: a multi-layered platform for cellular transportation of therapeutics.

Among lipid-based nanocarriers, multi-layered cochleates emerge as a novel delivery system because of prevention of oxidation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs, enhancement in permeability, and reduction in dose of drugs. It also improves oral bioavailability and increases the safety of a drug by targeting at a specific site with less side effects. Nanostructured cochleates are used as a carrier for the delivery of water-insoluble or hydrophobic drugs of anticancer, antiviral and anti-inflammatory action. This review article focuses on different methods for preparation of cochleates, mechanism of formation of cochleates, mechanism of action like cochleate undergoes macrophagic endocytosis and release the drug into the systemic circulation by acting on membrane proteins, phospholipids, and receptors. Advanced methods such as calcium-substituted and ß-cyclodextrin-based cochleates, novel techniques include microfluidic and modified trapping method. Cochleates showed enhancement in oral bioavailability of amphotericin B, delivery of factor VII, oral mucosal vaccine adjuvant-delivery system, and delivery of volatile oil. In near future, cochleate will be one of the interesting delivery systems to overcome the stability and encapsulation efficiency issues associated with liposomes. The current limiting factors for commercial preparation of cochleates involve high cost of manufacturing, lack of standardization, and specialized equipments.

[Comparative costs study between ready-to-administer bag of gemcitabine and production in reconstitution unit]. / Étude comparative de coûts entre les poches de gemcitabine prêtes à l'emploi et une fabrication en unité de reconstitution.

INTRODUCTION: Dose-banding is needed to rationalise cytotoxic drugs preparations. A new step was recently crossed: gemcitabine is the first molecule to be sold in ready-to-administer bag. What's the pharmaco-economic impact of gemcitabine ready-to-administer bags versus manufacturing in preparation unit? METHODS: A retrospective analysis of gemcitabine dosage prepared over three months permitted to explain our consumption of this drug, and by modelling, to characterize the good prescription interval for each dosage. Compared costs study assessed cost of medicine, preparation kit and preparation time. RESULTS: Over the study period, for 5%, 7.5% and 10% of deviation, respectively 67%, 75% and 76% of preparations were covered by standard doses. We chose 7.5% interval. The manufacturing cost of gemcitabine infusions is around 30,000€/year for vials with solution for infusion, 32,300€ for vials with powder, versus 67,300€ for ready-to-administer bag. Approximately 7.75minutes of pharmacy technician time would be saved by preparation. DISCUSSION: Ready-to-administer bags of gemcitabine allow relevant coverage of manufacturing doses. The annual extra cost would reach 37,200€ for our establishment. But, it can be justified by expected benefits: safer medication circuit, saving time of pharmacy technician….

Implementation and evaluation of a sterile compounding robot in a satellite oncology pharmacy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of robotic technology on efficiency, accuracy, and cost in a satellite oncology pharmacy. METHODS: A 33-week quasi-experimental study was conducted at an academic, quaternary care institution with 1,119 licensed beds from June 2016 to February 2017 to evaluate the turnaround time (TAT) for preparations compounded by automated robotic compounding technology (ARCT) versus historical procedures. Secondary endpoints included mean preparation time and percentage of doses with a TAT of <30 minutes before and after the implementation of ARCT and were evaluated using time-segmented regression analysis. The cost savings in the satellite oncology pharmacy was determined by comparing usage of closed-system transfer devices (CSTDs) and labor costs between study phases. Accuracy of the intervention was expressed through a descriptive analysis of mean ARCT dose preparation deviations and preparation failures. RESULTS: Data for 1,453 preparations were included for analysis. The mean ± S.D. preimplementation TAT was 64.1 ± 27.9 minutes, which decreased to 53.2 ± 32.2 minutes after ARCT implementation (p < 0.01). Financial benefit was demonstrated through supply cost savings. Breakeven was estimated at 8.6 years after capital expenditure, with an annualized projected savings of $129,477. The mean ± S.D. deviation of the doses compounded using ARCT was -0.58% ± 0.01% from the ordered dosage. CONCLUSION: Adoption of ARCT for compounding of admixtures containing 4 oncology agents reduced TAT and preparation time and led to lower expenditures for CSTDs.

The possibility of obtaining marketing authorization of orphan pharmaceutical compounding preparations: 3,4-DAP for Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical compounding preparations, produced by (hospital) pharmacies, usually do not have marketing authorization. As a consequence, some of these pharmaceutical compounding preparations can be picked-up by a pharmaceutical company to obtain marketing authorization, often leading to price increases. An example is the 3,4-diaminopyridine slow release (3,4-DAP SR) tablets for Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS). In 2009 marketing authorization was given for the commercial immediate release phosphate salt of the drug, including a fifty-fold price increase compared to the pharmaceutical compounding preparation. Obtaining marketing authorization for 3,4-DAP SR by academia might have been a solution to prevent this price increase. To determine whether the available data of a pharmaceutical compounding preparation with long-term experience in regular care are adequate to obtain marketing authorization, 3,4-DAP SR is used as a case study. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative case-study was performed. Initially, document analysis was executed by collecting the required data for marketing authorization in general and whether data of Firdapse® and 3,4-DAP SR met these requirements. Secondly, the (non-) available data of the two formulations were compared with each other to determine the differences in availability. RESULTS: At the time of approval, almost all data were available for both Firdapse® and 3,4-DAP SR. Conversely, much of the data used for the approval of Firdapse® originated from the 3,4-DAP immediate release (3,4-DAP IR) formulation. Only two bioequivalence studies and one pharmacology safety study was performed with Firdapse® before marketing authorization application. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, at time Firdapse® obtained approval, the data available did not differ substantially from 3,4-DAP SR, indicating that approval with 3,4-DAP SR would have been possible. We make a plea for approval of orphan medicinal products developed and manufactured by academic institutions as to keep utilization of these products affordable.

Cost-effectiveness study of closed system transfer devices for the preparation of antineoplastic agents.

Most cytostatic drugs cannot be administered directly to patients in their marketed presentation, but require previous reconstitution conducted in the Pharmacy Unit areas for cytostatic preparation. There are systems that allow drug reconstitution and transfer once it has been diluted, in order to protect staff from any potential contamination during handling. These are commonly known as Closed Systems, and generally have a piece for vial attachment and a syringe adapter with a built-in filter, that replace the traditional needles. Closed systems feature different characteristics and costs which is necessary to analyze in order to determine the most efficient one.

La mayoría de fármacos citostáticos no pueden ser administrados directamente desde la presentación comercial al paciente, sino que requieren de una reconstitución previa realizada en las áreas de elaboración de citostáticos en los Servicios de Farmacia. Existen sistemas que permiten reconstituir y extravasar el fármaco una vez diluido, para evitar la posible contaminación derivada de su manejo al personal. Estos sistemas se conocen comúnmente como sistemas cerrados, y de manera genérica constan de una pieza de fijación al vial y un adaptador para la jeringa con filtro integrado, que sustituyen a las tradicionales agujas. Los sistemas cerrados presentan diversas características y costes que son necesarios analizar para conocer cuál es el sistema más eficiente.

A preliminary analysis of the reduction of chemotherapy waste in the treatment of cancer with centralization of drug preparation.

INTRODUCTION: chemotherapy is essential to treat most types of cancer. Often, there is chemotherapy waste in the preparation of drugs prescribed to the patient. Leftover doses result in toxic waste production. OBJECTIVE: the aim of the study was to analyze chemotherapy waste reduction at a centralized drug preparation unit. METHODS: the study was cross-sectional, observational and descriptive, conducted between 2010 and 2012. The data were obtained from chemotherapy prescriptions made by oncologists linked to a health insurance plan in Curitiba, capital of the state of Paraná, in southern Brazil. Dose and the cost of chemotherapy waste were calculated in each application, considering the dose prescribed by the doctor and the drug dosages available for sale. The variables were then calculated considering a hypothetical centralized drug preparation unit. RESULTS: there were 176 patients with a cancer diagnosis, 106 of which underwent treatment with intravenous chemotherapy. There were 1,284 applications for intravenous anticancer medications. There was a total of 63,824mg in chemotherapy waste, the cost of which was BRL 448,397.00. The average cost of chemotherapy waste per patient was BRL 4,607.00. In the centralized model, there was 971.80mg of chemotherapy waste, costing BRL 13,991.64. The average cost of chemotherapy waste per patient was BRL 132.00. CONCLUSION: the use of centralized drug preparation units may be a strategy to reduce chemotherapy waste.

A preliminary analysis of the reduction of chemotherapy waste in the treatment of cancer with centralization of drug preparation / Uma análise preliminar da redução do resíduo de quimioterapia no tratamento do câncer com a centralização no preparo da medicação

SummaryIntroduction:chemotherapy is essential to treat most types of cancer. Often, there is chemotherapy waste in the preparation of drugs prescribed to the patient. Leftover doses result in toxic waste production.Objective:the aim of the study was to analyze chemotherapy waste reduction at a centralized drug preparation unit.Methods:the study was cross-sectional, observational and descriptive, conducted between 2010 and 2012. The data were obtained from chemotherapy prescriptions made by oncologists linked to a health insurance plan in Curitiba, capital of the state of Paraná, in southern Brazil. Dose and the cost of chemotherapy waste were calculated in each application, considering the dose prescribed by the doctor and the drug dosages available for sale. The variables were then calculated considering a hypothetical centralized drug preparation unit.Results:there were 176 patients with a cancer diagnosis, 106 of which underwent treatment with intravenous chemotherapy. There were 1,284 applications for intravenous anticancer medications. There was a total of 63,824mg in chemotherapy waste, the cost of which was BRL 448,397.00. The average cost of chemotherapy waste per patient was BRL 4,607.00. In the centralized model, there was 971.80mg of chemotherapy waste, costing BRL 13,991.64. The average cost of chemotherapy waste per patient was BRL 132.00.Conclusion:the use of centralized drug preparation units may be a strategy to reduce chemotherapy waste.

ResumoIntrodução:a quimioterapia é essencial no tratamento da maioria dos tipos de câncer. No processo de preparo da quimioterapia, com frequência, parte da medicação precisa ser descartada para se atingir a dose prescrita pelo médico. A dose excedente da medicação resulta na produção de resíduo tóxico.Objetivo:analisar a redução do resíduo de quimioterapia obtida por meio da centralização do preparo da medicação.Metodologia:foi realizado um estudo transversal observacional e descritivo entre 2010 e 2012, a partir da análise das prescrições de quimioterapia, pela auditoria médica de um plano de saúde, no estado do Paraná. Foi calculada a dose de quimioterapia desprezada e o seu custo, em cada aplicação, considerando a dose prescrita pelo médico e as apresentações comerciais das drogas. A mesma análise foi realizada em um modelo hipotético centralizado de preparo de quimioterapia.Resultados:foram identificados 176 pacientes, com diagnóstico de câncer, sendo que 106 pacientes realizaram um total de 1.284 aplicações endovenosas. Houve um total de 63.824 mg de resíduo de quimioterapia com custo de R$ 448.397,00. O custo médio de quimioterapia desprezada por paciente foi de R$ 4.607,00. No modelo centralizado de preparo houve 971,80 mg de resíduo com custo de R$ 13.991,64. Nesse modelo, o custo médio de quimioterapia desprezada por paciente seria de R$ 132,00.Conclusão:conclui-se que a centralização no preparo da medicação para o tratamento do câncer pode ser uma estratégia para reduzir os resíduos de quimioterapia.

Budget impact assessment of Aprokam® compared with unlicensed cefuroxime for prophylaxis of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis.

BACKGROUND: Intracameral cefuroxime is recommended as prophylaxis against postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) following cataract surgery. Aprokam is the only licensed product for prophylaxis of POE, although unlicensed intracameral cefuroxime may be administered using pre-filled syringes (PFS), either prepared in hospital by reconstituting cefuroxime via serial dilution (prepared PFS), or commercially purchased (purchased PFS). This study aimed to estimate the potential budget impact of using Aprokam over unlicensed cefuroxime for intracameral administration. METHODS: A budget impact model (BIM) was developed from UK NHS hospital perspective to estimate the economic impact of adopting Aprokam compared with purchased PFS or prepared PFS for the prophylaxis of POE following cataract surgery over a 5-year time horizon. The BIM incorporated direct costs only, associated with the acquisition, delivery, storage, preparation, and administration of cefuroxime. Resource utilisation costs were also incorporated; resource utilisation was sourced from a panel survey of hospital pharmacists, surgeons, and theatre nurses who are involved in the delivery, storage, preparation, quality assurance, or administration of cefuroxime formulations. Unit costs were sourced from NHS sources; drug acquisition costs were sourced from BNF. The model base case used a hypothetical cohort comprising of 1000 surgeries in the first year and followed a 5.2 % annual increase each year. RESULTS: The model predicts Aprokam is cost saving compared with purchased PFS, with a modest increase compared prepared PFS over 5 years. There are total savings of £ 3490 with Aprokam compared with purchased PFS, driven by savings in staff costs that offset greater drug acquisition costs. Compared with prepared PFS, there are greater drug acquisition costs which drive an increased total cost over 5 years of £ 13,177 with Aprokam, although there are substantial savings in staff costs as well as consumables and equipment costs. CONCLUSIONS: The lower direct costs of using Aprokam compared with purchased PFS presents a strong argument for the adoption of Aprokam where purchased PFS is administered. The additional benefits of Aprokam include increased liability coverage and possible reduction in dilution errors and contaminations; as such, in hospitals where unlicensed prepared PFS is used, modest additional resources should be allocated to adoption of Aprokam.

[Direct and indirect costs of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogues in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer in Italy]. / Analoghi sintetici dell'ormone di rilascio dell'ormone luteinizzante per il trattamento del carcinoma prostatico localmente avanzato o metastatico: analisi dei costi diretti e indiretti nello scenario italiano

BACKGROUND: When analyzing the use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues for different clinical indications, current available evidence does not support a presumed drug class effect among the various LHRH in the treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS: The following search key words were entered in the PubMed database and the NICE and FDA websites: "LHRH agonist AND prostatic cancer", "androgen deprivation therapy", "androgen suppression", "buserelin", "leuprorelin", "goserelin","triptorelin", "degarelix". The direct costs included the following items: follow-up visits, diagnostic exams (e.g. prostate-specific antigen PSA) and drug costs. The indirect costs included working days lost by the patient. RESULTS: With intermittent therapy as a reference, leuprorelin injectable solution of 22,25 mg was associated with the lowest cost and degarelix with the highest cost. However, given the mandatory presence of a nurse for drug injection, the buserelin depot formulation was associated with the lowest cost. If the costs for hospital visits were added to drug costs, differences between the various therapeutic strategies were less remarkable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed how various factors (e.g. route of administration, frequency of administration, presence of a nurse for drug reconstitution and injection) should be taken into account by decision makers in addition to the price of drugs.

Economic assessment of aseptic compounding rooms in hospital pharmacies in five European countries.

PURPOSE: The aims of the study are to make an inventory of fixtures of aseptic compounding structures, to compare, using real examples, the design and operating costs of controlled atmosphere area (CAA) with isolators and CAA with laminar flow biological safety cabinets (BSCs) in order to determine the most economical scheme in hospitals and to give a final facilities cost calculated for one workstation. METHODS: Forty-three hospitals were interviewed (21 French and 22 from four European countries) over seven months. Hospital pharmacists completed a form with 390 items. Hospitals are compared according to their workstation type: BSCII or BSCIII (group B) and isolator (group I), using Mann and Whitney's statistical test and Monte-Carlo modeling. RESULTS: Twenty-one hospitals responded (11 French and 10 from other European countries). All European compounding unit organizations are not significantly different. The study compared items such as infrastructure cost, equipment cost, staff cost, consumable cost, cleaning cost and control cost. A synthesis of all costs has been drafted to calculate an estimated preparation cost which seemed to be higher for group B than for group I when staff costs were included ($46 and $31, respectively, in study conditions). CONCLUSIONS: The different costs studied have revealed little significant difference between group B and I. The preparation cost in group B appears higher than in group I. This pilot study has resulted in the calculation of an estimated manufactured preparation cost but this work should be completed to help optimize resources and save money.

[The role of the cytostatic drugs unit in rationalization of hospital drugs management--the case study and the analysis of drug utilization]. / Znaczenie pracowni leków cytostatycznych w racjonalizacji szpitalnej gospodarki lekami--studium przypadku i analiza uzytkowania leków.

UNLABELLED: Until recently, the cytostatic drugs were being prepared at the Polish hospitals by the nursing staff on hospital wards, however according to the Pharmaceutical Law, preparation of cytostatic drugs, as a pharmaceutical service, should be performed by the pharmacists, who possess appropriate qualifications and experience in working within aseptic conditions and who are trained in professional handling with harmful substances. The aim of this paper has been to assess the impact, which establishment of the cytostatic drugs unit at the hospital pharmacy of the big oncologic hospital, located in southern Poland, had on the overall costs of cytostatic drugs utilization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis of drugs consumption, as well as determining the size of losses of particular active substances, prepared by the cytostatic drugs unit, have been based on statistical reports, provided by the hospital pharmacy. In order to calculate the level of consumption and losses of active substances in the chemotherapy ward, in framework of the previous modality of function, the estimations have been done, taking into consideration the same needs of particular patients, as those included within reports provided by the pharmacy. The actual prices of drugs from year 2012 have been applied in the assessment of costs of drug utilization. The calculations have been done with Excel and SPSS v.21 software. The methods of descriptive statistics and the comparison of groups, using the Student's t-test for dependent samples have been applied. RESULTS: Due to functioning of the centralized modality of cytostatic drugs preparation within the specialized unit, the decline of overall cytostatic drug consumption, amounting to 9.73% has been observed. The reduction in losses, on stage of preparation of drugs, has been achieved and the share of these losses within overall consumption of drugs has dropped by 77.28%. The dissolution of cytostatic drugs in the cytostatic drugs unit, instead of the chemotherapy ward, allows the hospital to achieve the yearly savings, exceeding PLN 572,276.07. CONCLUSIONS: Establisment of the cytostatic drugs unit, at the hospital pharmacy of the specialist oncologic hospital, not only allowed for increasing quality of pharmacotherapy, but also for substantial savings, when compared with the previously used method of dissolving and preparing cytostatic drugs by the nurses, instantly at the chemotherapy wards.

Compounded estradiol cream: a cost conscious alternative.

BACKGROUND: Vaginal estrogen is a common therapy for many gynecologic conditions. Medication cost poses a barrier to medication compliance. The purpose of our study is to report patient cost savings by utilizing compounding pharmacies in the preparation of topical vaginal estrogen. METHODS: A survey of 10 topical vaginal estrogen compounding pharmacies was performed and prescription cost data was obtained. The University of Oklahoma Outpatient Pharmacy and the 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health Pharmaceutical Audit Suite were cost comparisons for compounded estrogen. All data was processed using statistical software yielding descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The average cost of compounded estrogen was $42.22. At the University of Oklahoma Outpatient Pharmacy, average cost for branded vaginal estrogen preparation was $137.70. The national cost average for branded vaginal estrogen preparations was $82.42. Cost savings of $94.98 (69%) locally and $40.20 (51%) nationally was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Compounded estrogen is a cost conscious alternative than branded preparations.

Cost savings realized by use of the PhaSeal(®) closed-system transfer device for preparation of antineoplastic agents.

PURPOSE: Medication cost is a major factor associated with increasing health care costs in the United States. Expenditures for prescription drugs in 2013 are estimated to be $283.7 billion. Closed system transfer devices are widely used for preparation of hazardous drugs. Reports indicate the Phaseal(®) closed system transfer device maintains sterility in vials for 7 days, suggesting the unused portion of single-use vials could be salvaged. This study was done to determine whether using a closed system transfer device to extend the beyond-use date of single-use vials of antineoplastic medications would result in a measurable cost saving. METHODS: A list of 25 drugs available in single-use vials, with a chemical stability of at least 48 hours, was compiled. Use of these agents was recorded during a 50-day period in April through June 2012. Use from a total of 296 vials of 21 antineoplastic agents was recorded. After allowing for the initial use of each vial, the mean potential percentage of drug waste was calculated to be 57.03%. RESULTS: Actual savings during the study period was $96,348.70. The pharmacy avoided nearly half of the potential waste and saved a mean of 29% of each vial. The cost-saving during the study period represents a $703,047.67 annual saving; which more than offsets the $106,556.55 the pharmacy spent for the Phaseal(®) system in 2012. CONCLUSION: In addition to being a protective measure to reduce exposure to hazardous agents, use of the Phaseal(®) system results in a reduction in drug waste, and a noticeable cost saving for antineoplastic agents.

Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs.

PURPOSE: Antineoplastic preparation presents unique safety concerns and consumes significant pharmacy staff time and costs. Robotic antineoplastic and adjuvant medication compounding may provide incremental safety and efficiency advantages compared with standard pharmacy practices. METHODS: We conducted a direct observation trial in an academic medical center pharmacy to compare the effects of usual/manual antineoplastic and adjuvant drug preparation (baseline period) with robotic preparation (intervention period). The primary outcomes were serious medication errors and staff safety events with the potential for harm of patients and staff, respectively. Secondary outcomes included medication accuracy determined by gravimetric techniques, medication preparation time, and the costs of both ancillary materials used during drug preparation and personnel time. RESULTS: Among 1,421 and 972 observed medication preparations, we found nine (0.7%) and seven (0.7%) serious medication errors (P = .8) and 73 (5.1%) and 28 (2.9%) staff safety events (P = .007) in the baseline and intervention periods, respectively. Drugs failed accuracy measurements in 12.5% (23 of 184) and 0.9% (one of 110) of preparations in the baseline and intervention periods, respectively (P < .001). Mean drug preparation time increased by 47% when using the robot (P = .009). Labor costs were similar in both study periods, although the ancillary material costs decreased by 56% in the intervention period (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although robotically prepared antineoplastic and adjuvant medications did not reduce serious medication errors, both staff safety and accuracy of medication preparation were improved significantly. Future studies are necessary to address the overall cost effectiveness of these robotic implementations.