Salivary toxicity from PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals: What we have learned and where we are going.

Clinical trials of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted radiopharmaceuticals have shown encouraging results. Some agents, like lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), are already approved for late line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Projections are for continued growth of this treatment modality; [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is being studied both in earlier stages of disease and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies. Further, the drug development pipeline is deep with variations of PSMA-targeting radionuclides, including higher energy alpha particles conjugated to PSMA-honing vectors. It is safe to assume that an increasing number of patients will be exposed to PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals during the course of their cancer treatment. In this setting, it is important to better understand and mitigate the most commonly encountered toxicities. One particularly vexing side effect is xerostomia. In this review, we discuss the scope of the problem, inventories to better characterize and monitor this troublesome side effect, and approaches to preserve salivary function and effectively palliate symptoms. This article aims to serve as a useful reference for prescribers of PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals, while also commenting on areas of missing data and opportunities for future research.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6-8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: 162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18-21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64-76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0-17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3-11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29-0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group. INTERPRETATION: The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer. FUNDING: Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

Cutaneous, Subcutaneous, and Bilateral Adrenal Gland Metastases in Progressive Prostate Carcinoma: Theranostic Potential of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging and 177 Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy.

ABSTRACT: Prostate carcinoma (PC) is the second most common malignant tumor in males globally. The metastatic spread of PC usually involves the pelvic and abdominal lymph nodes and the skeletal system. Cutaneous metastases are exceedingly uncommon and typically manifest themselves late in the disease course, considered as ominous sign with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We describe a patient wherein 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected multiple uncommon metastatic sites in the cutaneous region of the scrotum, penis, and thigh, as well as in the subcutaneous region of anterior abdominal wall, and in bilateral adrenal glands. These findings served as a theranostic tool for selecting 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment for these extremely rare metastatic sites.

Radionuclide Therapy With 177 Lu-PSMA in a Patient With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: A 69-year-old man diagnosed with progressive bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate adenocarcinoma and concurrent alcoholic cirrhosis with multiple hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules was referred to our nuclear medicine service for 177 Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. The patient's pretreatment screening using 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT revealed high prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in both prostatic and HCC lesions. The patient underwent 2 doses of 177 Lu-PSMA-617. Subsequent imaging assessments with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and hepatic MRI indicated progressive HCC nodules, while showing a partial response in prostatic bone metastases. Positive clinical and biological responses were observed only in prostatic disease, but not in HCC nodules.

Exploring the role of combined external beam radiotherapy and targeted radioligand therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for prostate cancer - from bench to bedside.

Management of prostate cancer (PC) might be improved by combining external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) with lutetium-177 (177Lu)-labeled PSMA inhibitors. We hypothesized a higher efficacy of the combination due to augmentation of the radiation dose to the tumor and interactions of EBRT with PSMA expression potentially increasing radiopharmaceutical uptake. Therefore, this study analyzed the influence of radiation on PSMA expression levels in vitro. The results were translated to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of photon EBRT and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in a murine PC xenograft model. Finally, a clinical case report on a combined elective field EBRT with RLT dose escalation illustrates a proof-of-concept. Methods: PSMA gene and protein expression were assessed in human PSMA-overexpressing LNCaP cells after irradiation using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), flow cytometry and On-Cell Western assays. In the in vivo therapy study, LNCaP tumor-bearing BALB/c nu/nu mice were irradiated once with 2 Gy X-ray EBRT and injected with 40 MBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 after 4 h or received single or no treatment (n = 10 each). Tumor-absorbed doses by [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were calculated according to the Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry (MIRD) formalism after deriving time-activity curves using a gamma probe. An exemplified patient case is demonstrated where fractionated EBRT (54 Gy to prostate; 45 Gy to pelvic lymphatics) and three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (3.4-6.0 GBq per cycle) were sequentially combined under concurrent androgen deprivation for treating locally advanced PC. Results: At 4 h following irradiation with 2-8 Gy, LNCaP cells displayed a PSMA protein upregulation by around 18% relative to non-irradiated cells, and a stronger upregulation on mRNA level (up to 2.6-fold). This effect was reversed by 24 h when PSMA protein levels were downregulated by up to 22%. Mice treated with the combination therapy showed significantly improved outcomes regarding tumor control and median survival (p < 0.0001) as compared to single or no treatment. Relative to monotherapy with PSMA-RLT or EBRT, the tumor doubling time was prolonged 1.7- or 2.7-fold and the median survival was extended by 24% or 60% with the combination, respectively. Additionally, tumors treated with EBRT exhibited a 14% higher uptake of the radiopharmaceutical as evident from the calculated tumor-absorbed dose, albeit with high variability in the data. Concerning the patient case, the tri-modality treatment was well tolerated and the patient responded with a long-lasting complete biochemical remission for five years following end of PSMA-RLT. The patient then developed a biochemical relapse with oligo-recurrent disease on follow-up imaging. Conclusion: The present preclinical and clinical data demonstrate that the combination of EBRT with dose escalation by PSMA-RLT improves tumor control and potentially prolongs survival. This may pave the way for further clinical investigations of this approach to explore the curative potential of the combination therapy.

Genomic Correlates of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression and Response to 177Lu-PSMA-617: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: While 177Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) is an effective therapy for many patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), biomarkers associated with outcomes are not well defined. We hypothesized that prostate cancer mutational profile may associate with clinical activity of LuPSMA. We devised a study to evaluate associations between mCRPC mutational profile with LuPSMA clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with mCRPC with next-generation sequencing (NGS) who received LuPSMA. PSA50 response (ie, ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) rate, PSA progression free survival (PSA PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between genetically defined subgroups. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with NGS results who received at least one cycle of LuPSMA were identified. The median age was 73 (IQR, 68-78) years, 124 (98.4%) received ≥1 prior androgen receptor-signaling inhibitor, and 121 (96%) received ≥1 taxane-based chemotherapy regimen. Fifty-eight (46%) patients with a DNA damage repair gene mutation (DNA damage response group) and 59 (46.8%) with a mutation in TP53, RB1, or PTEN tumor suppressor genes (TSG group) were identified. After adjusting for relevant confounders, the presence of ≥1 TSG mutation was associated with shorter PSA PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93 [95% CI, 1.05 to 3.54]; P = .034) and OS (HR, 2.65 [95% CI, 1.15 to 6.11]; P = .023). There was improved OS favoring the DNA damage response group (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.97]; P = .044) on multivariable analysis. Univariate analysis of patients with ATM mutations had significantly higher rates of PSA50 response, PSA PFS, and OS. CONCLUSION: Outcomes on LuPSMA varied on the basis of mutational profile. Prospective studies to define the clinical activity of LuPSMA in predefined genomic subgroups are justified.

Clinical Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Where Does Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Fit in the Treatment Algorithm?

Most men with newly appreciated metastatic prostate cancer are optimally treated with a backbone consisting of androgen receptor-directed therapy with or without taxane chemotherapy. Despite improvements in disease outcomes, prostate cancer remains an extremely heterogeneous disease with variable mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. As a result, it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Radiopharmaceutical therapy has emerged as an alternative, non-androgen receptor-directed treatment modality for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that impacts patient survival and represents a potentially more personalized approach. In this review, we aim to outline the current treatment landscape for metastatic prostate cancer with a focus on radiopharmaceutical therapy, specifically 177Lu-PSMA-617. In addition, we illustrate various clinical challenges with 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment to date and explore investigative efforts to leverage radiopharmaceutical therapies as part of combination regimens or earlier in the treatment algorithm to further improve patient outcomes. Finally, we introduce ongoing studies of alternative radiopharmaceutical therapies in metastatic prostate cancer that may be incorporated into the treatment algorithm pending further study.

Real-World Experience with 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy After Food and Drug Administration Approval.

We report our initial real-world experience with 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Pretreatment PSMA PET, laboratory findings, overall survival, a fall in prostate-specific antigen by 50% (PSA50), and toxicities were evaluated. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included. Sixty patients achieved a PSA50. Seven of 18 (39%) patients who did not meet the TheraP PSMA imaging criteria achieved a PSA50. Nineteen of 31 (61%) patients who did not meet the VISION laboratory criteria achieved a PSA50. Sixty-three patients had a delay or stoppage in therapy, which was due to a good response in 19 patients and progressive disease in 14 patients. Of 10 patients with a good response who restarted treatment, 9 subsequently achieved a PSA50 on retreatment. The most common toxicities were anemia (33%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). Conclusion: At our center, patients who did not meet the TheraP PSMA imaging criteria or the VISION laboratory criteria benefited from 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy.

[161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in patients with mCRPC: preliminary dosimetry results and intra-individual head-to-head comparison to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617.

Rationale: Evaluation of alternative radionuclides for use in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) is currently focusing on 161Tb, which may provide advantages by emitting additional Auger and conversion electrons. In this pilot study, we present preliminary dosimetry data for [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT in a direct comparison with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Method: Six patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) underwent treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and subsequently - after inadequate response - with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617. Whole-body planar and SPECT imaging-based dosimetry of organs at risk (kidneys and salivary glands) and tumor lesions were calculated using IDAC for 177Lu and OLINDA/EXM for 161Tb. The therapeutic index (TI) of mean tumor-absorbed doses over relevant organs at risk was calculated. Results: Mean absorbed doses to organs at risk of PSMA-RLT were slightly higher for [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 compared to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (kidneys: 0.643 ± 0.247 vs. 0.545 ± 0.231 Gy/GBq, factor 1.18; parotid gland: 0.367 ± 0.198 vs. 0.329 ± 0.180 Gy/GBq, factor 1.10), but markedly higher regarding tumor lesions (6.10 ± 6.59 vs 2.59 ± 3.30 Gy/GBq, factor 2.40, p < 0.001). Consequently, the mean TI was higher for [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 compared to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for both, the kidneys (11.54 ± 9.74 vs. 5.28 ± 5.13, p = 0.002) and the parotid gland (16.77 ± 13.10 vs. 12.51 ± 18.09, p = 0.008). Conclusion: In this intra-individual head-to-head pilot study, [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 delivered higher tumor-absorbed doses and resulted in superior TI compared to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. This preliminary data support 161Tb as a promising radionuclide for PSMA-RLT in mCRPC.

Cutaneous Metastasis From Prostate Cancer on Posttherapeutic 177 Lu-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Scan.

ABSTRACT: In this note, we aim to present a patient with a known case of prostate cancer with widespread metastasis to the skeleton and liver who has undergone several cycles of chemoradiotherapy. The patient received 2 doses of 177 Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen therapy, in which several zones of uptake were detected on the thoracic wall compatible with cutaneous metastatic lesions of prostate cancer.

A multicentric, single arm, open-label, phase I/II study evaluating PSMA targeted radionuclide therapy in adult patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer (PRadR).

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION: Our prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014.

177 Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy in a Case of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

ABSTRACT: We report a 65-year-old man with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who was treated with 2 cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. PET/CT imaging of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 revealed a complete metabolic response (PERCIST1.0) after therapy. The prostate-specific antigen concentration drastically decreased (97.7% down).

Comparison of PET/CT-based eligibility according to VISION and TheraP trial criteria in end-stage prostate cancer patients undergoing radioligand therapy.

BACKGROUND: Two randomized clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (PSMA RLT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). While the VISION trial used criteria within PSMA PET/CT for inclusion, the TheraP trial used dual tracer imaging including FDG PET/CT. Therefore, we investigated whether the application of the VISION criteria leads to a benefit in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) for men with mCRPC after PSMA RLT. METHODS: Thirty-five men with mCRPC who had received PSMA RLT as a last-line option and who had undergone pretherapeutic imaging with FDG and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA I&T or [18F]PSMA-1007 were studied. Therapeutic eligibility was retrospectively evaluated using the VISION and TheraP study criteria. RESULTS: 26 of 35 (74%) treated patients fulfilled the VISION criteria (= VISION+) and only 17 of 35 (49%) fulfilled the TheraP criteria (= TheraP+). Significantly reduced OS and PFS after PSMA RLT was observed in patients rated VISION- compared to VISION+ (OS: VISION-: 3 vs. VISION+: 12 months, hazard ratio (HR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-9.1, p < 0.01; PFS: VISION-: 1 vs. VISION+: 5 months, HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0-7.8, p < 0.01). For patients rated TheraP-, no significant difference in OS but in PFS was observed compared to TheraP+ patients (OS: TheraP-: 5.5 vs. TheraP+: 11 months, HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-3.3, p = 0.2; PFS: TheraP-: 1 vs. TheraP+: 6 months, HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Retrospective application of the inclusion criteria of the VISION study leads to a benefit in OS and PFS after PSMA RL, whereas TheraP criteria appear to be too strict in patients with end-stage prostate cancer. Thus, performing PSMA PET/CT including a contrast-enhanced CT as proposed in the VISION trial might be sufficient for treatment eligibility of end-stage prostate cancer patients.

Change in total lesion PSMA (TLP) during [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy predicts overall survival in patients with mCRPC: monocentric evaluation of a prospective registry.

PURPOSE: This study investigates imaging response of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) based on the whole-body parameter total lesion PSMA (TLP), derived by PSMA-PET/CT and reflecting the total tumor burden, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled in a prospective registry (NCT04833517). METHODS: A total of n = 102 mCRPC patients received a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at baseline and after two cycles of PSMA-RLT, in which TLP was measured by using a semi-automated tumor segmentation. TLP was defined as the summed products of volume and uptake (∑ Volume × SUVmean) of all tumor lesions. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the most appropriate ∆TLP thresholds for classification into partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) regarding overall survival (OS). Furthermore, we analyzed criteria that are also frequently used in established response frameworks, such as the occurrence of new metastases as independent criterion (I) or in combination with change in tumor burden (II), and the change in PSA serum value (III). RESULTS: For the ∆TLP thresholds -30%/+30% (and also for higher thresholds, -40%/+40% or -50%/+50%), significant differences between all three response categories became apparent (PR/PD: p = 0.001; PR/SD: p = 0.001; SD/PD: p = 0.018). Including the development of new metastases as independent criterion of PD, there was no significant difference in OS between SD and PD (p = 0.455), neither when applied in combination with TLP (p = 0.191). Similarly, significant differentiation between SD and PD was not achieved by PSA serum value (p = 0.973). CONCLUSION: In the largest monocentric study to date, TLP is shown to be a qualified prognostic biomarker, applying ∆TLP thresholds of -30%/+30%. It significantly differentiated between PR, SD, and PD, whereas other response criteria did not differentiate SD vs. PD. Using TLP, the development of new metastases is not a required information for predicting OS.

Early response monitoring during [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T therapy with quantitated SPECT/CT predicts overall survival of mCRPC patients: subgroup analysis of a Swiss-wide prospective registry study.

PURPOSE: To assess early tumor response with quantitated SPECT/CT and to correlate it with clinical outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with 177Lutetium-PSMA I&T therapy. METHODS: Single-center, observational study, part of the prospective Swiss national cancer registry study investigating the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (EKNZ: 2021-01271) in mCRPC patients treated with at least two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T 6-weekly. After the first and second cycle quantitated SPECT/CT (Symbia Intevo, Siemens) was acquired 48 h after injection (three fields of view from head to thigh, 5 s/frame) and reconstructed using xQuant® (48i, 1 s, 10-mm Gauss). Image analysis: The PSMA-positive total tumor volumes (TTV) were semi-automatically delineated using a SUV threshold of 3 with MIMencore® (version 7.1.3, Medical Image Merge Software Inc.). Changes in TTV, highest tumor SUVmax, and total tumor SUVmean between cycles 1 and 2 were calculated and grouped into a) stable or decrease and b) increase. Serum PSA levels were assessed at each therapy cycle and at follow-up until progression or death. Changes in TTV, PSA, SUVmax, and SUVmean were correlated with PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and the overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier methodology (log-rank test). RESULTS: Between 07/2020 and 04/2022, 111 patients were screened and 73 finally included in the data analysis. The median follow-up was 8.9 months (range 1.4-26.6 months). Stable or decreased TTV at cycle 2 was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.86, p < 0.01). Similar, stable, or decreased PSA was associated with longer OS (HR 0.21; CI 0.07-0.62, p < 0.01) and PSA-PFS (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.16-0.72, p < 0.01). Combining TTV and PSA will result in an augmented prognostic value for OS (HR 0.09; CI 0.01-0.63; p < 0.01) and for PSA-PFS (HR 0.11; CI 0.02-0.68; p < 0.01). A reduction of SUVmax or SUVmean was not prognostically relevant, neither for OS (p 0.88 and 0.7) nor for PSA-PFS (p 0.73 and 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Six weeks after initiating [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T, TTV and serum PSA appear to be good prognosticators for OS. Combined together, TTV + PSA change demonstrates augmented prognostic value and can better predict PSA-PFS. Larger studies using TTV change prospectively as an early-response biomarker are warranted for implementing management change towards a more personalized clinical practice.

A phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and patient-specific dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This translational study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, dosimetry, and therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-EB-01 (denoted as [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: A total of 13 patients with mCRPC were recruited in this study. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation protocol was performed. The following dose levels were ultimately evaluated: 1.11, 1.85, and 2.59 GBq/cycle. Patients received [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 therapy for up to two cycles at a 6-week interval. RESULTS: Patients received fractionated doses of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 ranging from 1.11 to 2.59 GBq per cycle. Myelosuppression was dose-limiting at 2.59 GBq, and 1.85 GBq was determined to be the MTD. The total-body effective dose for 177Lu-LNC1003 was 0.35 ± 0.05 mSv/MBq. The salivary glands were found to receive the highest estimated radiation dose, which was calculated to be 3.61 ± 2.83 mSv/MBq. The effective doses of kidneys and red bone marrow were 1.88 ± 0.35 and 0.22 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq, respectively. The tumor mean absorbed doses for bone and lymph node metastases were 8.52 and 9.51 mSv/MBq. Following the first treatment cycle, PSA decline was observed in 1 (33.3%), 4 (66.7%), and 2 (50.0%) patients at dose levels 1 (1.11 GBq), 2 (1.85 GBq), and 3 (2.59 GBq), respectively. Compared with the baseline serum PSA value, 1 (33.3%) at dose level 1 and 4 (66.6%) patients at dose level 2, presented a PSA decline after the second treatment cycle. CONCLUSION: This phase 1 trial revealed that the MTD of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 is 1.85 GBq. The treatment with multiple cycles at the dose of 1.11 GBq /cycle and 1.85 GBq /cycle was well tolerated. [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 has higher tumor effective doses in bone and lymph nodes metastases while the absorbed dose in the red bone marrow should be closely monitored in future treatment studies with higher doses and multiple cycles. The frequency of administration also needs to be further explored to assess the efficacy and side effects of [177Lu]Lu-LNC1003 treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 177Lu-PSMA-EB-01 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT05613738, Registered 14 November 2022). URL of registry https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05613738.