Novel Textbook Outcomes following emergency laparotomy: Delphi exercise.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcomes are composite outcome measures that reflect the ideal overall experience for patients. There are many of these in the elective surgery literature but no textbook outcomes have been proposed for patients following emergency laparotomy. The aim was to achieve international consensus amongst experts and patients for the best Textbook Outcomes for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi exercise was undertaken with three planned rounds to achieve consensus regarding the best Textbook Outcomes based on the category, number and importance (Likert scale of 1-5) of individual outcome measures. There were separate questions for non-trauma and trauma. A patient engagement exercise was undertaken after round 2 to inform the final round. RESULTS: A total of 337 participants from 53 countries participated in all three rounds of the exercise. The final Textbook Outcomes were divided into 'early' and 'longer-term'. For non-trauma patients the proposed early Textbook Outcome was 'Discharged from hospital without serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation or death). For trauma patients it was 'Discharged from hospital without unexpected transfusion after haemostasis, and no serious postoperative complications (adapted Clavien-Dindo for trauma ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation on or death)'. The longer-term Textbook Outcome for both non-trauma and trauma was 'Achieved the early Textbook Outcome, and restoration of baseline quality of life at 1 year'. CONCLUSION: Early and longer-term Textbook Outcomes have been agreed by an international consensus of experts for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. These now require clinical validation with patient data.

[Chinese expert consensus on implementation and management of brain-computer interface clinical research in neurological diseases].

The development of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology and its preliminary research results show great clinical application prospects. In particular, the application of BCI technologyis a hot research topic in the field of nervous system diseases at present, but the current BCI technology is still in the stage of experimental exploration, needing systematic and standardized clinical research validation. For this purpose, the consensus is led by the Society of Neurosurgery of Chinese Medical Association and Society of Cerebrovascular Surgery of Chinese Stroke Association. Based on the in-depth discussion of multidisciplinary experts and the vote of the Delphi Method, the guidelines and principles are proposed for pre-clinical qualification review, clinical research implementation and management, and long-term effect tracking and evaluation, so as to standardize research ethics and clinical research procedures and further promote the extensive application and in-depth development of BCI technology in the treatment of nervous system diseases.

[Expert consensus on standardized clinical applications of minimally invasive tooth extraction techniques].

Tooth extraction is a common and widely employed therapeutic procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Minimally invasive tooth extraction can reduce both physical and psychological trauma to the patients, and is widely recommended as a first-line clinical treatment. But currently no guidelines or consensus has been available to provide a systematic introduction of minimally invasive tooth extraction to guide the clinical practices. To address this issue, this consensus, based on a comprehensive literature review and clinical experiences of experts, systematically summarizes the indications, target patients, and contraindications of minimally invasive tooth extraction, the overall workflow of this procedure (preoperative preparation, surgical steps, postoperative management, postoperative instructions, medications, and follow-up), and its common postoperative complications to provide a comprehensive guidance for clinical application of this technique.

International consensus on sleep problems in pediatric palliative care: Paving the way.

OBJECTIVE: Sleep problems constitute a common and heterogeneous complaint in pediatric palliative care (PPC), where they often contribute to disease morbidity and cause additional distress to children and adolescents and their families already facing the burden of life-threatening and life-limiting conditions. Despite the significant impact of sleep problems, clinical evidence is lacking. The application of general pediatric sleep recommendations appears insufficient to address the unique challenges of the PPC dimension in terms of disease variability, duration, comorbidities, complexity of needs, and particular features of sleep problems related to hospice care. Therefore, we initiated an international project aimed at establishing a multidisciplinary consensus. METHODS: A two-round Delphi approach was adopted to develop recommendations in the areas of Definition, Assessment/Monitoring, and Treatment. After selecting a panel of 72 worldwide experts, consensus (defined as ≥75% agreement) was reached through an online survey. RESULTS: At the end of the two voting sessions, we obtained 53 consensus recommendations based on expert opinion on sleep problems in PPC. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses the need to personalize sleep medicine's approach to the palliative care setting and its peculiarities. It provides the first international consensus on sleep problems in PPC and highlight the urgent need for global guidance to improve sleep-related distress in this vulnerable population and their caregivers. Our findings represent a crucial milestone that will hopefully enable the development of guidelines in the near future.

[Expert consensus on the whole-course management of implantable venous access port in the upper arm of cancer patients (2024 edition)].

As one of a major public health issue in China, the number of new cases and deaths of malignant tumors has been climbing year by year. Implantable venous access port (IVAP) is used as a safe infusion route in the treatment of malignant tumor patients such as infusion of antitumor drugs and intravenous nutrition. With the widespread application of ultrasound-guided Sedinger puncture techniques and intracardiac electrocardiogram positioning technology, IVAP in the upper arm has been recognized by the majority of medical personnel and cancer patients due to its advantages of hiding scars and completely avoiding the risk of hemothorax and pneumothorax. In order to standardize the clinical application of IVAP via the upper arm approach in cancer patients, improve the success rate of implantation, reduce complications and improve patient satisfaction, the Breast Cancer Expert Committee of the National Cancer Quality Control Center consulted guidelines and the latest evidence-based evidences and established the expert consensus on the whole-course management of implantable venous access port in the upper arm of cancer patients through literature research and expert discussions, in order to provide reference for the standard application of IVAP in the upper arm. The consensus mainly introduces the indications, contraindications, preoperative evaluation, implantation site, operation procedure, utilization and maintenance, complications and management, medical staff training and patient education of IVAP in the upper arm, in order to provide reference for clinical staff.

[Expert consensus on ultrasound guided thyroid and neck lymph node puncture (2023 edition)].

Thyroid nodule and cervical lymph node biopsy is the main clinical method for evaluating the condition and determining the follow-up treatment plan. The literature on thyroid nodule puncture predominantly focuses on thyroid fine needle puncture, and there are limited systematic articles on coarse needle aspiration for thyroid-related diseases and needle biopsy of thyroid-related cervical lymph node diseases. However, this shortage of articles does not reflect the diagnostic value of coarse needle aspiration in thyroid biopsy and cervical lymph node-related diseases. Currently, different departments of many hospitals in China are conducting or planning to perform needle biopsy of thyroid and cervical lymph node-related diseases to improve the standardization and safety of related operations. Standardization is needed for the indications, contraindications, perioperative period, postoperative complications management, puncture specimen processing, and related genetic analysis of thyroid and cervical lymph node puncture. For this purpose, Interventional Ultrasound Committee of Chinese College of Interventionalists organized a panel of domestic experts in the field of thyroid diseases to discuss and formulate a consensus. Based on the latest research progress, combined with the clinical realities in China, this Expert Consensus on Ultrasound Guided Thyroid and Neck Lymph Node Puncture (2023 edition) is released.

[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in women].

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) shows sex differences in the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical presentation. Women have different characteristics of OSA at different life stages. Based on 26 guidelines and consensus, 121 English literatures, and 24 Chinese literatures, the Sleep Disorder Group of Chinese Thoracic Society has drafted a consensus with multidisciplinary experts to summarize the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of OSA in women at different life stages, particularly issues related to OSA during pregnancy. The consensus is divided into four parts: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and issues for pregnant women with OSA, with 34 recommendations covering 13 clinical issues. The aim was to improve the understanding and managements of OSA in women.Summary of recommendationsQuestion 1: What is the prevalence of OSA in women at different life stages?The prevalence of OSA varies among women at different life stages. Sex differences are not significant in childhood and adolescence. The prevalence of OSA in women of childbearing age is significantly lower than that in men. The prevalence of OSA increases during pregnancy due to changes in hormone levels and the influence of pregnancy physiology, as well as with gestational weeks. In postmenopausal women, the prevalence of OSA increases significantly, and the sex differences are no longer significant.Question 2: What are the risk factors for OSA in women at different life stages?The risk factors for OSA in women at different life stages are not identical. (1) Childhood and adolescence: Tonsillar and adenoid hypertrophy, obesity, and craniofacial structural anomalies increase the risk of OSA; (2) Childbearing age: The prevalence of OSA in women is lower than in men. However, obesity, hypothyroidism, acromegaly, and polycystic ovary syndrome increase the risk of OSA, and these patients should be screened for OSA; (3) Pregnancy: hormonal effects, uterine enlargement, and weight changes increase the risk of OSA, especially in those with a history of snoring or OSA before pregnancy; (4) Perimenopausal and post-menopausal periods: Decreased levels of estrogen/progesterone reduce the protective effects on the upper airways, and increase the risk of OSA. Menopause is an important risk factor for OSA in women.Question 3: What are the harms of OSA in women?OSA is an independent risk factor for diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, emotional and cognitive impairments, and malignant tumors in women. OSA during pregnancy has several adverse effects on maternal and infant health, and is associated with increased risks of preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (HDM), premature birth, neonatal asphyxia, fetal growth restriction, etc.Question 4: What are the clinical symptoms and physical signs of OSA in women?The symptoms of OSA in women are different from those in men. Attention should be paid to whether women snore and the frequency of snoring, especially among postmenopausal and obese women. The atypical symptoms of OSA, including insomnia, daytime fatigue, morning headache, anxiety and nightmares, should not be ignored, especially in postmenopausal, obese, and pregnant women.Question 5: When should women be screened for OSA?(1) Postmenopausal and pregnant women, as well as women with a first-degree relative with OSA. It should be noted that the clinical symptoms of OSA in women are not typical; (2) Women with polycystic ovary syndrome, hypothyroidism, and acromegaly; (3) Women engaged in various occupations, including driving and working at heights.Question 6: How to screen OSA in women?Many screening tools and questionnaires can be used to screen for OSA, but should not be used to diagnose OSA in the absence of objective sleep tests. (1) Questionnaires and screening tools: The STOP-Bang questionnaire targeting the general population has higher sensitivity than Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and others. STOP Bang≥3 points combined with ESS can further improve its specificity and can be used for OSA screening in women. However, the questionnaire has poor sensitivity for female OSA. Type Ⅳ monitoring devices can be used for OSA screening in women with a weak recommendation; (2) PSG is the gold standard for diagnosis. Type Ⅱ or Ⅲ portable monitoring (PM) devices are recommended for the diagnosis of OSA in women in the following conditions: 1) Diagnosis of high-risk OSA patients without complex comorbidities; 2) OSA patients who are immobile or critically ill and unable to undergo PSG monitoring in a sleep center; 3) Diagnosis of perioperative OSA patients; 4) Pregnant women with high suspicion of OSA.Question 7: How to diagnose OSA in women?The diagnostic and grading criteria for adult non-pregnant women with OSA are the same as the diagnostic criteria for adult OSA; for diagnosis and grading of OSA in pregnant women, see "Section 4: OSA in Pregnancy".Question 8: How to treat OSA in women?For all the OSA patients with varying degrees of severity in women, the general treatment can be applied: weight loss, dietary control, exercise, position therapy, reduction of alcohol intake, and cautious use of sedative and hypnotic drugs. Medical costs and the risk of comorbidities with OSA in women are higher than those in men. Therefore, OSA patients in women should be promptly evaluated and treated.Question 9: How to optimize non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) treatment and improve compliance for OSA patients in women?(1) NPPV is the first-line treatment for moderate to severe OSA in women. It can relieve upper airway obstruction, eliminate sleep hypoxia, improve sleep quality and quality of life, and reduce the incidence of related complications and mortality; (2) To improve compliance with NPPV treatment, behavioral interventions and patient education are recommended. Selecting an appropriate human-machine interface, improving the humidification effect, promptly handling adverse reactions, and applying remote medical models may improve the compliance.Question 10: What are the other options for OSA treatment in women?Other treatment methods include oral appliances, upper airway surgery, and sublingual nerve stimulation therapy, which have moderate therapeutic effects in women. Postmenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in women has a certain therapeutic effect on OSA, but its safety needs further evaluation.Question 11: What is follow-up evaluation for OSA in women?(1) Follow-up every 6 months or 1 year after receiving NPPV treatment; (2) PSG should be rechecked at the 3rd and 6th months after surgical treatment to evaluate the therapeutic effects. For patients with poor therapeutic effects after surgery, it is recommended to use treatments such as NPPV; (3) PSG should be rechecked at the 3rd and 6th months after oral appliance treatment. Oral appliances should be adjusted as needed to consolidate long-term efficacy, or switched to a treatment such as NPPV; (4) During follow-up, attention should be paid to the improvement of apnea hypopnea index(AHI), symptoms, and side effects; (5) It is recommended that NPPV treatment be remotely managed via the internet, which can provide high-quality and comprehensive sleep care; (6) Follow-up of OSA during pregnancy can be found in "Section 4: OSA in Pregnancy ".Question 12: How to diagnose and evaluate OSA during pregnancy?OSA during pregnancy has adverse effects on maternal and infant outcomes. It is recommended that high-risk pregnant women be screened and diagnosed for OSA during pregnancy management and healthcare.(1) Screening of the high-risk population: Individuals who meet any of the following criteria are considered at high risk for OSA during pregnancy. 1) Symptoms: snoring during sleep, arousal, headache in the morning, insomnia, depression, excessive daytime sleepiness, and fatigue; 2) Pregnant women over 35 years old; 3) Physical signs: weight exceeding standard body weight by 20% or more, BMI≥28 kg/m2, and neck circumference>40 cm; anatomical abnormalities of the upper airways, such as nasal obstruction, tonsil hypertrophy, and mandibular retrognathia, etc.; 4) Combined internal medicine diseases, such as refractory hypertension, unknown arrhythmia, chronic congestive heart failure, refractory diabetes and insulin resistance, refractory asthma, hypothyroidism, primary aldosteronism; 5) Those with obstetric related diseases, such as preeclampsia, HDP, GDM, and intrauterine growth restriction of the fetus, and with symptoms of chest tightness and apnea that cannot be explained by other factors, and with previous history of gestational OSA or family history.(2) Screening time: There is currently no strong evidence to support the recommendation for optimal screening time. Given the adverse effects of OSA on mothers and infants, it is recommended that high-risk individuals of OSA be screened for OSA between12 and 18 weeks of pregnancy.(3) Screening tools: The main manifestations of OSA in pregnant women are insomnia and poor sleep quality, whereas daytime drowsiness is often not severe. Various sleep questionnaires and models for OSA in pregnancy have poor sensitivity and specificity. Type Ⅳ and consumer-level monitoring devices are lack of sufficient clinical validation. It is recommended that the results of the above screening tools should only have an indicative role in the diagnosis of OSA during pregnancy.(4) Diagnostic tools: PSG is the gold standard for the diagnosis of OSA in pregnancy. PM may be the first choice diagnostic technique for OSA in pregnancy, and Type Ⅲ monitoring devices are the most commonly used devices.(5) Diagnostic criteria: Diagnosis of OSA during pregnancy should be based on symptoms, signs, and PSG or PM monitoring results.Diagnostic criteria for OSA during pregnancy are as follows: 1) PSG or PM monitoring shows AHI≥5 times/h with symptoms or signs of OSA in women, or with related complications (such as diagnosed hypertension, emotional disorders, unexplained arrhythmias, chronic congestive heart failure, HDP, HDM, intrauterine growth restriction that cannot be explained by other factors, chest tightness and apnea excluding other reasons), or with previous history of OSA or family history of OSA; 2) PSG or PM monitoring shows AHI≥10 times/h in those with less daytime drowsiness (ESS≤9 points).Question 13: How to manage OSA during pregnancy?(1) Once OSA is diagnosed during pregnancy, personalized treatment plans from pregnancy to birth should be developed through collaborative discussions between sleep center professionals, obstetricians, pregnant women, and their families. Multidisciplinary collaboration among anaesthesia, neonatology, and critical care medicine may be required in some cases. A comprehensive management approach should be adopted based on the patient's condition, which includes strengthening weight management, positioning treatment, NPPV treatment, oral appliances, and management of maternal and infant complications; (2) Considering the Regarding continuous weight gain during pregnancy, APAP treatment is more appropriate mode for pregnant women with OSA; (3) Oral appliances are suitable for patients with snoring or mild to moderate OSA, especially those with combined mandibular retraction or NPPV intolerance. However, oral appliances are not recommended as the first-line treatment; (4) It is not recommended to use surgical methods to treat OSA during pregnancy; (5) Follow-up and evaluation: Patients' conditions should be re-evaluated and treatment plans should be adjusted at around 24 weeks of pregnancy. Postpartum PSG or PM monitoring should be repeated to assess the need for continued treatment after delivery.

DECIDE (Diverse experiences of End-of-Life Care for Dementia) establishing consensus and capacity for future research through collaboration and co-production.

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a leading cause of death globally. However, end-of-life care is often poor or non-existent. People with dementia from ethnic minorities or socioeconomically deprived communities are even less likely to receive good palliative care. Despite this, research into end-of-life care often fails to include people from these populations. AIM: To find out what research is required to improve end-of-life care for everyone with dementia and how to facilitate inclusivity. METHOD: A scoping review of the academic literature (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Scopus databases) published between Jan 2000 and April 2023 was conducted. Findings were shared with diverse key stakeholders through a series of workshops. Conclusions were subsequently used to provide evidence-based recommendations for inclusive end-of-life care and future research. RESULTS: Themes from the literature were evident in the personal and professional experiences of key stakeholders. Palliative care providers are often ignorant of the needs of those dying in the margins. Support services are scarce and unequal geographically. There is a lack of personalised and culturally appropriate care for those with dementia and their families. Themes from the stakeholder groups included a need for better communication between services, and more investment into dementia as a palliative condition, with avenues created to increase trust and facilitate engagement with services. CONCLUSION: Future research should focus on educational strategies, including how optimal end-of-life care differs for those with dementia compared to other life-limiting conditions, with appropriate models of inclusive, appropriately funded care needed.

Research priorities of members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee.

Aims: This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology. Methods: Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list. Results: This consensus exercise took place between December 2020 and April 2022. A total of 286 clinicians from the BASK membership provided input for the initial scoping exercise, which generated a list of 105 distinct research questions. Following review and prioritization, a longlist of 51 questions was sent out for two rounds of the Delphi process. A total of 42 clinicians responded to the first round and 24 responded to the second round. A final list of 24 research questions was then ranked by 36 clinicians. The topics included arthroplasty, infection, meniscus, osteotomy, patellofemoral, cartilage, and ligament pathologies. The management of early osteoarthritis was the highest-ranking question. Conclusion: A Delphi exercise involving the BASK membership has identified the future research priorities in knee surgery. This list of questions will allow clinicians, researchers, and funders to collaborate in order to deliver high-quality research in knee surgery and further advance the care provided to patients with knee pathology.

[Chinese expert consensus for resection margin in rectal cancer surgery (2024 edition)].

Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignant tumor in China, with rectal cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases. While neoadjuvant therapy is essential for diagnosis and treatment, proctectomy with radical resection remains indispensable. Especially for middle and low rectal cancer, the length of the distal resection margin is critical for prognosis, organ preservation, and postoperative quality of life. However, determining a "safe" margin to ensure the radical resection (R0) while maximizing the function of the anal sphincter poses a significant challenge for surgeons. Aiming at this, we conducted a comprehensive review of authoritative guidelines and literature domestically and internationally. We divided the issues related to resection margin in proctectomy into three chapters: (1) the concept and definition of the resection margin; (2) the evaluation of the resection margin in preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative stages; and (3) radical resection of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. With the help of the Delphi method, the expert group voted twice for 14 recommendations and finally established the "Chinese Expert Consensus for Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery (2024 version)". This consensus serves as a valuable reference for clinicians to carry out proctectomy of rectal cancer, which can improve patient's quality of life without affecting their prognosis.

Marginal zone lymphomas: a consensus practice statement from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance.

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are a rare, indolent group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with different diagnostic, genetic and clinical features and therapeutic implications. The most common is extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, followed by splenic MZL and nodal MZL. Patients with MZL generally have good outcomes with long survival rates but frequently have a relapsing/remitting course requiring several lines of therapy. The heterogeneous presentation and relapsing course present the clinician with several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This position statement presents evidence-based recommendations in the setting of Australia and New Zealand.

Standardised definitions and diagnostic criteria for extranodal extension detected on histopathological examination in head and neck cancer: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.

Detection of extranodal extension on histopathology in surgically treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma indicates poor prognosis. However, there is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria, interpretation, and reporting of histology detected extranodal extension, which has contributed to conflicting evidence in the literature, and likely clinical inconsistency. The Head and Neck Cancer International Group conducted a three-round modified Delphi process with a group of 19 international pathology experts representing 15 national clinical research groups to generate consensus recommendations for histology detected extranodal extension diagnostic criteria. The expert panel strongly agreed on terminology and diagnostic features for histology detected extranodal extension and soft tissue metastasis. Moreover, the panel reached consensus on reporting of histology detected extranodal extension and on nodal sampling. These consensus recommendations, endorsed by 19 organisations representing 34 countries, are a crucial development towards standardised diagnosis and reporting of histology detected extranodal extension, and more accurate data collection and analysis.

Criteria for the diagnosis of extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging in head and neck cancer: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.

Extranodal extension of tumour on histopathology is known to be a negative prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Compelling evidence suggests that extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging is also a negative prognostic factor. Furthermore, if imaging detected extranodal extension could be identified reliably before the start of treatment, it could be used to guide treatment selection, as patients might be better managed with non-surgical approaches to avoid the toxicity and cost of trimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy together). There are many aspects of imaging detected extranodal extension that remain unresolved or are without consensus, such as the criteria to best diagnose them and the associated terminology. The Head and Neck Cancer International Group conducted a five-round modified Delphi process with a group of 18 international radiology experts, representing 14 national clinical research groups. We generated consensus recommendations on the terminology and diagnostic criteria for imaging detected extranodal extension to harmonise clinical practice and research. These recommendations have been endorsed by 19 national and international organisations, representing 34 countries. We propose a new classification system to aid diagnosis, which was supported by most of the participating experts over existing systems, and which will require validation in the future. Additionally, we have created an online educational resource for grading imaging detected extranodal extensions.

Assessment of endpoint definitions in curative-intent trials for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.

Robust time-to-event endpoint definitions are crucial for the assessment of treatment effect and the clinical value of trial interventions. Here, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group investigated endpoint use in phase 3 trials and trials considered potentially practice-changing published between 2008 and 2021 in the curative-intent setting for patients with mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Of the 92 trials reviewed, we show that all core components of endpoint reporting were heterogeneous, including definitions of common terms, such as overall survival and progression-free survival. Our report highlights the urgent need for harmonisation of fundamental components of clinical trial endpoints and the engagement of all stakeholders to ensure the transparent reporting of endpoint details.

Assessment of endpoint definitions in recurrent and metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma trials: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations.

Transparent and precise endpoint definitions are a crucial aspect of clinical trial conduct and reporting, and are used to communicate the benefit of an intervention. Previous studies have identified inconsistencies in endpoint definitions across oncological clinical trials. Here, the Head and Neck Cancer International Group assessed endpoint definitions from phase 3 trials or trials considered practice-changing for patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, published between 2008 and 2021. We identify considerable and global heterogeneity in endpoint definitions, which undermines the interpretation of results and development of future studies. We show how fundamental components of even incontrovertible endpoints such as overall survival vary widely, highlighting an urgent need for increased rigour in reporting and harmonisation of endpoints.

Consensus-Based Guidelines for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Management in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Addressing Unmet Regional Needs and the Changing AML Landscape.

PURPOSE: AML is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy. Region-specific recommendations for AML management can enhance patient outcomes. This article aimed to develop recommendations for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. METHODS: Ten AML panel members from Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (KOQU) participated in a modified two-round Delphi process. The panel first identified the unmet regional needs and finalized a list of core variables. Next, they voted on iterative statements drawn from international recommendations and provided feedback via a questionnaire. Consensus voting ≤70% was discussed, and additional clinical decision making statements were suggested. At round closure, a consensus vote took place on revised statements. RESULTS: The panel reached ≥97.8% consensus on AML management. The panel agreed to use international risk stratification categories for personalized treatment of AML. The presence of ≥10% blasts for recurrent genetic abnormalities was required for a diagnosis of AML. Key consensus was reached for different treatment stages. The panel noted that older patients pose a challenge because of poor cytogenetics and genetic anomalies and require different treatment approaches. The panel recommended venetoclax-hypomethylating agents; fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; and targeted therapy for AML relapsed/refractory disease. Supportive care is considered on the basis of prevailing organisms and drug resistance. CONCLUSION: The GCC KOQU's consensus-based recommendations for managing AML include an evidence-based and region-specific framework.

Building consensus on the application of organoid-based drug sensitivity testing in cancer precision medicine and drug development.

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) have emerged as a promising platform for clinical and translational studies. A strong correlation exists between clinical outcomes and the use of PDOs to predict the efficacy of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. To standardize interpretation and enhance scientific communication in the field of cancer precision medicine, we revisit the concept of PDO-based drug sensitivity testing (DST). We present an expert consensus-driven approach for medication selection aimed at predicting patient responses. To further standardize PDO-based DST, we propose guidelines for clarification and characterization. Additionally, we identify several major challenges in clinical prediction when utilizing PDOs.

The Role of Imaging for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Consensus Recommendations From the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.

[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases exacerbated by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （2024, Chengdu）].

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-exacerbated respiratory disease （N-ERD） is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation, featuring chronic rhinosinusitis （CRS）, asthma, and intolerance to cyclooxygenase 1 （COX-1） inhibitors. The use of these medications can lead to an acute worsening of rhinitis and asthma symptoms. This condition has not yet received sufficient attention in China, with a high rate of misdiagnosis and a lack of related research. The Chinese Rhinology Research Group convened a group of leading young experts in otolaryngology from across the country, based on the latest domestic and international evidence-based medical practices to formulate this consensus.The consensus covers the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, and treatment strategies for N-ERD, including pharmacotherapy, surgery, biologic treatments, and desensitization therapy. The goal is to improve recognition of N-ERD, reduce misdiagnosis, and enhance treatment outcomes.

Surgical Handover Core Outcome Measures (SH-CORE): a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for trials in surgical handover.

BACKGROUND: Surgical handover is associated with a significant risk of care failures. Existing research displays methodological deficiencies and little consensus on the outcomes that should be used to evaluate interventions in this area. This paper reports a protocol to develop a core outcome set (COS) to support standardisation, comparability, and evidence synthesis in future studies of surgical handover between doctors. METHODS: This study adheres to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative guidance for COS development, including the COS-Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Reporting (COS-STAR) recommendations. It has been registered prospectively on the COMET database and will be led by an international steering group that includes surgical healthcare professionals, researchers, and patient and public partners. An initial list of reported outcomes was generated through a systematic review of interventions to improve surgical handover (PROSPERO: CRD42022363198). Findings of a qualitative evidence synthesis of patient and public perspectives on handover will augment this list, followed by a real-time Delphi survey involving all stakeholder groups. Each Delphi participant will then be invited to take part in at least one online consensus meeting to finalise the COS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) Research Ethics Committee (202309015, 7th November 2023). Results will be presented at surgical scientific meetings and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. A plain English summary will be disseminated through national websites and social media. The authors aim to integrate the COS into the handover curriculum of the Irish national surgical training body and ensure it is shared internationally with other postgraduate surgical training programmes. Collaborators will be encouraged to share the findings with relevant national health service functions and national bodies. DISCUSSION: This study will represent the first published COS for interventions to improve surgical handover, the first use of a real-time Delphi survey in a surgical context, and will support the generation of better-quality evidence to inform best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative 2675.  http://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2675 .