RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient informed consent is a crucial subject in preoperative care of patients before elective hand surgery, ensuring that patients have the necessary information and a comprehensive understanding to make autonomous decisions. The use of video-based informed consent systems is an innovative concept to enhance the consent process with multimedia tools. In addition to the conventional process, mostly relying on verbal communication and written documents, the video-based approach aims to present information in a standardized and visually appealing format. METHODS: In this study, 33 patients were asked to watch a video on a tablet about the planned elective hand surgery after a conventional pre-treatment consultation including informed consent throughout verbal explanations and paper forms by an attending physician or resident. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire after watching the video. RESULTS: An overwhelming majority of participants, specifically 97.0%, stated that the video improved their understanding of the upcoming surgery. 90.9% of the participant would refer the video to other patients undergoing elective hand surgery, while 72.7% of participants indicated that they would have appreciated the opportunity to view an informational video before undergoing different types of surgeries in the past. CONCLUSION: The use of a video-based patient information system in elective hand surgery had a positive impact on patient education and satisfaction with the informed consent process. Therefore, it is a powerful tool in preoperative management to guarantee a standardized and educative informed consent.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Mãos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Gravação em Vídeo , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Mãos/cirurgia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Adulto , Idoso , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Informed consent for participation in an RCT is an important ethical and legal requirement. In placebo surgical trials, further issues are raised, and to date, this has not been explored. Patient information leaflets (PILs) are a core component of the informed consent process. This study aimed to investigate the key content of PILs for recently completed placebo-controlled trials of invasive procedures, including surgery, to highlight areas of good practice, identify gaps in information provision for trials of this type and provide recommendations for practice. METHODS: PILs were sought from trials included in a recent systematic review of placebo-controlled trials of invasive procedures, including surgery. Trial characteristics and data on surgical and placebo interventions under evaluation were extracted. Directed content analysis was applied, informed by published regulatory and good practice guidance on PIL content and existing research on placebo-controlled surgical trials. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and presented as a narrative summary. RESULTS: Of the 62 eligible RCTs, authors of 59 trials were contactable and 14 PILs were received for analysis. At least 50% of all PILs included content on general trial design. Explanations of how the placebo differs or is similar to the surgical intervention (i.e. fidelity) were reported in 6 (43%) of the included PILs. Over half (57%) of the PILs included information on the potential therapeutic benefits of the surgical intervention. One (7%) included information on potential indirect therapeutic benefits from invasive components of the placebo. Five (36%) presented the known risks of the placebo intervention, whilst 8 (57%) presented information on the known risks of the surgical intervention. A range of terms was used across the PILs to describe the placebo component, including 'control', 'mock' and 'sham'. CONCLUSION: Developers of PILs for placebo-controlled surgical trials should carefully consider the use of language (e.g. sham, mock), be explicit about how the placebo differs (or is similar) to the surgical intervention and provide balanced presentations of potential benefits and risks of the surgical intervention separately from the placebo. Further research is required to determine optimal approaches to design and deliver this information for these trials.
Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Folhetos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Efeito Placebo , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Placebos , CompreensãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although access to a professional medical interpreter is federally mandated, surgeons report underutilization during informed consent. Improvement requires understanding the extent of the lapses. Adoption of electronic consent (eConsent) has been associated with improvements in documentation and identification of practice improvement opportunities. The authors evaluated the impact of the transition from paper to eConsent on language-concordant surgical consent delivery for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). METHODS: The study period (February 8, 2023, to June 14, 2023) corresponds to the period immediately following the institutional adoption of eConsents. Inclusion criteria included age > 18 years, documented preferred language other than English, and self-signed eConsent form. The authors assessed documentation of language-concordant interpreter-mediated verbal consent discussion and delivery of the written surgical consent form in a language-concordant template. Performance was compared to a preimplementation baseline derived from monthly random audits of paper consents between January and December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 1,016 eConsent encounters for patients with LEP were included, with patients speaking 49 different languages, most commonly Spanish (46.5%), Chinese (22.1%), and Russian (6.8%). After the implementation of eConsent, overall documentation of language-concordant interpreter-mediated consents increased from 56.9% to 83.9% (p < 0.001), although there was variation between surgical services and between languages, suggesting that there is still likely room for improvement. Most patients (94.1%) whose preferred language had an associated translated written consent template (Spanish, Chinese, Russian, Arabic), received a language-concordant written consent. CONCLUSION: The transition to eConsent was associated with improved documentation of language-concordant informed consent in surgery, both in terms of providing written materials in the patient's preferred language and in the documentation of interpreter use, and allowed for the identification of areas to target for practice improvement with interpreter use.
Assuntos
Documentação , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Proficiência Limitada em Inglês , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Documentação/normas , Feminino , Masculino , Tradução , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Termos de Consentimento/normas , Idioma , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Barreiras de ComunicaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The digitalization in the healthcare sector promises a secondary use of patient data in the sense of a learning healthcare system. For this, the Medical Informatics Initiative's (MII) Consent Working Group has created an ethical and legal basis with standardized consent documents. This paper describes the systematically monitored introduction of these documents at the MII sites. METHODS: The monitoring of the introduction included regular online surveys, an in-depth analysis of the introduction processes at selected sites, and an assessment of the documents in use. In addition, inquiries and feedback from a large number of stakeholders were evaluated. RESULTS: The online surveys showed that 27 of the 32 sites have gradually introduced the consent documents productively, with a current total of 173,289 consents. The analysis of the implementation procedures revealed heterogeneous organizational conditions at the sites. The requirements of various stakeholders were met by developing and providing supplementary versions of the consent documents and additional information materials. DISCUSSION: The introduction of the MII consent documents at the university hospitals creates a uniform legal basis for the secondary use of patient data. However, the comprehensive implementation within the sites remains challenging. Therefore, minimum requirements for patient information and supplementary recommendations for best practice must be developed. The further development of the national legal framework for research will not render the participation and transparency mechanisms developed here obsolete.
Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Alemanha , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Humanos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Termos de Consentimento/normas , Termos de Consentimento/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Because residents are frequently delegated the task of obtaining consent early in their training, the American Association of Medical Colleges describes "obtaining informed consent" as a core entrustable professional activity (EPA) for medical school graduates. However, prior studies demonstrated that residents frequently perform this task without receiving formal instruction or assessment of competency. This study sought to understand how attending physicians decide to delegate obtaining informed consent for surgical procedures to trainees. METHOD: The authors conducted a survey of attending surgeons at a university-based health care system of 6 affiliated teaching hospitals (October-December 2020) to collect data about current entrustment practices and attendings' knowledge, experience, and attitudes surrounding the informed consent process. Summary statistics and bivariate analyses were applied. RESULTS: Eighty-five attending surgeons participated (response rate, 49.4%) from diverse specialties, practice types, and years in practice. Fifty-eight of 85 (68.2%) stated they "never" granted responsibility for the consent conversation to a trainee, and 74/81 (91.4%) reported they typically repeated their own consent conversation whenever a trainee already obtained consent. The most common reasons they retained responsibility for consent were ethical duty (69/82, 84.1%) and the patient relationship (65/82, 79.3%), while less than half (40/82, 48.8%) described concerns about trainee competency. Reflecting on hypothetical clinical scenarios, increased resident competency did not correspond with increased entrustment ( P = .27-.62). Nearly all respondents (83/85, 97.7%) believed residents should receive formal training; however, only 41/85 (48.2%) felt additional training and assessment of residents might change their current entrustment practices. CONCLUSIONS: Attendings view informed consent as an ethical and professional obligation that typically cannot be entrusted to trainees. This practice is discordant with previous literature studying residents' perspectives. Furthermore, resident competency does not play a predominant role in this decision, calling into question whether informed consent can be considered an EPA.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Internato e Residência/ética , Competência Clínica/normas , Masculino , Feminino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Cirurgia Geral/ética , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/éticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to demonstrate the performance of the popular artificial intelligence (AI) language model, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.), in generating the informed consent (IC) document of blepharoplasty. METHODS: A total of 2 prompts were provided to ChatGPT to generate IC documents. Four board-certified plastic surgeons and 4 nonmedical staff members evaluated the AI-generated IC documents and the original IC document currently used in the clinical setting. They assessed these documents in terms of accuracy, informativeness, and accessibility. RESULTS: Among board-certified plastic surgeons, the initial AI-generated IC document scored significantly lower than the original IC document in accuracy ( p < 0.001), informativeness ( p = 0.005), and accessibility ( p = 0.021), while the revised AI-generated IC document scored lower compared with the original document in accuracy ( p = 0.03) and accessibility ( p = 0.021). Among nonmedical staff members, no statistical significance of 2 AI-generated IC documents was observed compared with the original document in terms of accuracy, informativeness, and accessibility. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that current ChatGPT cannot be used as a distinct patient education resource. However, it has the potential to make better IC documents when improving the professional terminology. This AI technology will eventually transform ophthalmic plastic surgery healthcare systematics by enhancing patient education and decision-making via IC documents.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Blefaroplastia , Termos de Consentimento , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Humanos , Blefaroplastia/métodos , Termos de Consentimento/normas , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normasRESUMO
In the past decade, the use of intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) in thyroid and parathyroid surgery has been widely accepted by surgeons as a useful technology for improving laryngeal nerve identification and voice outcomes, facilitating neurophysiological research, educating and training surgeons, and reducing surgical complications and malpractice litigation. Informing patients about IONM is not only good practice and helpful in promoting the efficient use of IONM resources but is indispensable for effective shared decision making between the patient and surgeon. The International Neural Monitoring Study Group (INMSG) feels complete discussion of IONM in the preoperative planning and patient consent process is important in all patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery. The purpose of this publication is to evaluate the impact of IONM on the informed consent process before thyroid and parathyroid surgery and to review the current INMSG consensus on evidence-based consent. The objective of this consensus statement, which outlines general and specific considerations as well as recommended criteria for informed consent for the use of IONM, is to assist surgeons and patients in the processes of informed consent and shared decision making before thyroid and parathyroid surgery.
Assuntos
Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Internacionalidade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/normas , Paratireoidectomia/normas , Tireoidectomia/normas , Humanos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/efeitos adversos , Glândulas Paratireoides/cirurgia , Paratireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Glândula Tireoide/cirurgia , Tireoidectomia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The use of social media (SoMe) in medicine has demonstrated the ability to advance networking among clinicians and other healthcare staff, disseminate research, increase access to up-to-date information, and inform and engage medical trainees and the public at-large. With increasing SoMe use by vascular surgeons and other vascular specialists, it is important to uphold core tenets of our commitment to our patients by protecting their privacy, encouraging appropriate consent and use of any patient-related imagery, and disclosing relevant conflicts of interest. Additionally, we recognize the potential for negative interactions online regarding differing opinions on optimal treatment options for patients. The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is committed to supporting appropriate and effective use of SoMe content that is honest, well-informed, and accurate. The Young Surgeons Committee of the SVS convened a diverse writing group of SVS members to help guide novice as well as veteran SoMe users on best practices for advancing medical knowledge-sharing in an online environment. These recommendations are presented here with the goal of elevating patient privacy and physician transparency, while also offering support and resources for infrequent SoMe users to increase their engagement with each other in new, virtual formats.
Assuntos
Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Comunicação Acadêmica/normas , Mídias Sociais/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Atitude Frente aos Computadores , Benchmarking , Conflito de Interesses , Consenso , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
Recent reports suggest that the use of an outpatient-based procedure (pneumatic retinopexy, PR) for retinal detachment repair should be encouraged within the UK, especially in light of Covid-19 and possible restrictions/competing demands on access to operating theatres. It is therefore essential that patients receive comprehensive information about the risks and benefits of this approach compared with a formal surgical repair either by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and/or scleral buckling (SB). We report a retrospective case series of retinal detachments (RD) satisfying the strict selection criteria for PR but who were managed with formal surgery. Single-operation success rate for PPV/SB at six months follow-up was 93.8% in our study, higher than published primary success rates for PR (60-80%). When counselling patients for possible PR, the ease, speed and potentially reduced co-morbidity of an outpatient-based procedure needs to be balanced against its significantly higher failure rate in comparison with primary PPV/SB.
Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Retina/cirurgia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/normas , Vitrectomia/normas , Idoso , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retina/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recurvamento da Esclera/estatística & dados numéricos , Vitrectomia/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The wider availability of genomic sequencing, notably gene panels, in cancer care allows for personalised medicine or the tailoring of clinical management to the genetic characteristics of tumours. While the primary aim of mainstream genomic sequencing of cancer patients is therapy-focussed, genomic testing may yield three types of results beyond the answer to the clinical question: suspected germline mutations, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and unsolicited findings pertaining to other conditions. Ideally, patients should be prepared beforehand for the clinical and psychosocial consequences of such findings, for themselves and for their family members, and be given the opportunity to autonomously decide whether or not to receive such unsolicited genomic information. When genomic tests are mainstreamed into cancer care, so should accompanying informed consent practices. This paper outlines what mainstream oncologists may learn from the ethical tradition of informed consent for genomic sequencing, as developed within clinical genetics. It argues that mainstream informed consent practices should focus on preparing patients for three types of unsolicited outcomes, briefly and effectively. Also, it argues that when the chance of unsolicited findings is very low, opt-out options need not be actively offered. The use of a layered approach - integrated in information systems - should render informed consent feasible for non-geneticist clinicians in mainstream settings. (Inter) national guidelines for mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing must be developed.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Testes Genéticos/normas , Genômica/métodos , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Neoplasias/genética , Medicina de Precisão , Família , Testes Genéticos/ética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/psicologiaAssuntos
Teste para COVID-19/normas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Autonomia Pessoal , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste para COVID-19/ética , Tomada de Decisões , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/ética , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/ética , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Informed consent is required prior to any medical procedure. In the context of cancer treatment, special efforts are needed to inform cancer patients properly about treatment, potential sequelae and alternative therapies. Little is known about the effectiveness of current informed consent strategies and patients' individual satisfaction. Given the heterogeneity in terms of age, education, sex and other factors, detailed understanding of patients' comprehension and perception is the basis for further optimization of the informed consent process, which was the aim of the current investigation. METHODS: Patients with a new cancer diagnosis and recent informed consent were asked to complete a questionnaire about satisfaction, comprehension, time management, physician-patient relationship and other items of the informed consent process. Patients were followed for 6 months and invited to complete a follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 89 patients completed the first questionnaire and 52 the follow-up questionnaire. Subjective understanding was assumed high, however, this did not correlate with objective understanding. Age and education were identified as influencing factors for comprehension. 85% of the patients were satisfied with the information provided. A major gap was the information on alternative therapies. Moreover, not all patients perceived the consent dialog as such, and particularly the individual treatment intention partially remained unclear for some patients. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure that informed consent is based on solid understanding, informed consenting must be patient-centered and consider the individual expectations, needs and abilities of cancer patients. Further studies are required to develop tailored informed consent strategies.
Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Comunicação , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Neoplasias/terapia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Compreensão , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Postoperative opioids are overprescribed in the United States. In November 2016 the State of Pennsylvania required an opioid consent for minors. Our hypothesis is that this mandate decreased postoperative opioid prescriptions in our division. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who received a urological outpatient or minor emergency procedure from August 2015 to August 2019 were identified. Surgeries performed within 6 months after mandate implementation were excluded to account for the transition period. Perioperative data including case type were extracted by a clinical data warehouse from preexisting fields within the health record. The frequencies of postoperative prescriptions, delayed prescriptions and emergency department encounters were assessed. A multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of opioid prescription at discharge was performed. RESULTS: A total of 4,349 patients were analyzed. The frequency of postsurgical opioid prescriptions decreased from 45.3% to 2.6% (p <0.001). The median morphine milligram equivalent decreased by 22.5 among children prescribed an opioid (p <0.001). Rates of an emergency department visits (3% vs 2.7%) or delayed nonopioid prescriptions (0.8% vs 1.2%) within 30 days of discharge were unchanged (p >0.05). Fewer patients received a delayed opioid prescription after mandate implementation (0.03% vs 0.5%, p <0.001). Female patients were less likely (OR 0.309, 95% CI 0.195-0.491; p <0.001) to receive opioids prior to but not after the mandate (OR 0.309, 95% CI 0.544-2.035; p=0.122). Increasing age was predictive of receiving an opioid before (OR 1.187, 95% CI 1.157-1.218; p <0.001) and after (OR 1.241, 95% CI 1.186-1.299; p <0.001) the mandate. CONCLUSIONS: A state mandated opioid consent for minors greatly reduced post-urological surgery opioid prescription rates without increasing rates of readmission or delayed prescriptions.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Manejo da Dor/normas , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/normas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Uso de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/efeitos adversos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Masculino , Epidemia de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pennsylvania , Padrões de Prática Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Governo Estadual , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Urologistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Urologistas/normas , Urologistas/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Introduction: Cholecystectomy is the most frequently performed procedure in general surgery. The consent procedure for cholecystectomy needs to inform patients about the possibility of subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) as an alternative procedure used for "difficult gallbladders" as it is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. We sought to determine the quality of informed consent for patients who were scheduled for cholecystectomy but underwent STC, and evaluate whether patient or procedural factors influenced the information discussed in consenting. Materials and Methods: We classified 57 components of information necessary for a patient to give informed consent for cholecystectomy. We retrospectively reviewed the consent forms of patients scheduled for conventional cholecystecomy but instead undergoing STC between 2011 and 2017. Consent quality was measured as the percentage of components completed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine whether age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, setting (elective/nonelective), operation mode (open/laparoscopic), or the responsible surgeon affected consent quality. Results: Across 174 patients, just 9 (5.2%) had been informed about the possibility of undergoing STC, whereas the overall quality of consent was 37.5%. Patient and setting-specific factors affected the completion of specific consent components. Patients were more likely to receive a patient information leaflet if they were female (relative risk [RR] 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-7.00), <60 years (RR 3.32; 95% CI 1.39-7.90) or undergoing laparoscopic surgery (RR 8.04; 95% CI 2.50-25.88). Conclusion: The suboptimal quality of consent and multiple inconsistencies in the information disclosed to different patient cohorts emphasize the need for a more transparent and consistent consenting process.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic groin pain following inguinal hernia surgery is a common and potentially debilitating complication, and yet patients are infrequently informed of this risk. This leaves surgeons open to negligence claims, especially given recent changes to case law, which for the first time highlighted the need for a more patient-centred approach to risk disclosure. We investigated how these changes have influenced our consenting practice with respect to the disclosure of this risk. METHODS: We compared how often surgeons discussed the risk of chronic groin pain with adults undergoing elective open unilateral inguinal hernia mesh repairs in 2019 and 2009. The first 50 patients in each of these two years were retrospectively compared. Discussions during the initial consultation and on the day of surgery were assessed by reviewing clinic letters, medical notes and consent forms. FINDINGS: The risk of chronic pain was discussed with significantly more patients in 2019 than in 2009 (96% v 54%, p<0.0001). Most of these discussions occurred on the day of surgery (92% v 54%, p<0.0001). Only a few patients had these discussions during their initial consultation (18% v 4%, p<0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Discussing the risk of chronic groin pain has improved significantly over the past 10 years. However, these discussions occur mostly on the day of surgery, which gives patients very little time to weigh up the risk. This potentially invalidates the consent they give for surgery. Patients should be given an opportunity to discuss their operative risks in advance of their operation.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Revelação/tendências , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Idoso , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Revelação/normas , Feminino , Virilha , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The informed consent discussion (ICD) is a compulsory element of clinical practice. Surgical residents are often tasked with obtaining informed consent, but formal instruction is not included in standard curricula. This study aims to examine attitudes of surgeons and residents concerning ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey regarding ICD was administered to residents and attending surgeons at an academic medical center with an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery residency. RESULTS: In total, 44 of 64 (68.75%) residents and 37 of 50 (72%) attending surgeons participated. Most residents felt comfortable consenting for elective (93%) and emergent (82%) cases, but attending surgeons were less comfortable with resident-led ICD (51% elective, 73% emergent). Resident comfort increased with postgraduate year (PGY) (PGY1 = 39%, PGY5 = 85%). A majority of participants (80% attending surgeons, 73% residents) believed resident ICD skills should be formally evaluated, and most residents in PGY1 (61%) requested formal instruction. High percentages of residents (86%) and attendings (100%) believed that ICD skills were best learned from direct observation of attending surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Resident comfort with ICD increases as residents advance through training. Residents acknowledge the importance of their participation in this process, and in particular, junior residents believe formal instruction is important. Attending surgeons are not universally comfortable with resident-led ICDs, particularly for elective surgeries. Efforts for improving ICD education including direct observation between attending surgeons and residents and formal evaluation may benefit the residency curriculum.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Internato e Residência , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Cirurgiões , Competência Clínica/normas , Cirurgia Geral/ética , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Humanos , Illinois , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Internato e Residência/ética , Internato e Residência/métodos , Internato e Residência/normas , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/ética , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/psicologia , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/normas , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/ética , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Cirurgiões/normas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
SUMMARY: The current status of the plastic surgeon in the medical liability spectrum and ways to avoid litigation are explored by using pooled national data from the Medical Professional Liability Association, private information from Applied Medico-Legal Solutions RRG, and a detailed literature search. The medical liability system in the United States costs $55.6 billion, or 2.4 percent of total health care spending. Plastic surgery accounts for 3.31 percent of reported claims and 3.16 percent of paid claims. Total payments for plastic surgeons represent 1.75 percent of the total paid for all specialties. Malpractice awards are relatively light for plastic surgeons. Nevertheless, they still have a 15 percent chance per year of being sued. However, 93 percent of cases will close with a dismissal or a settlement, and only 7 percent will go to trial. Of these, the plastic surgeon will prevail in 79 percent. Most importantly, 75 percent of all cases will result in no payment. To minimize the chances of a lawsuit, plastic surgeons should maintain excellent communication with their patients and participate in shared decision-making. They should take a leadership role and buy in to the performance of perioperative checklists, embrace patient education, and actively participate in Maintenance of Certification. They should be transparent in their dealings with patients by preoperatively declaring their policies on revisions, refunds, complications, and payments. Plastic surgeons must maintain complete and accurate medical records and participate in hospital-based programs of prophylaxis. They should be aware that postoperative infection is the single costliest adverse outcome and proactively deal with it.