Emerging trends: the involvement of community pharmacists in the planning and execution of pharmaceutical policies and economics.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze existing research on the involvement of community pharmacists in the planning and execution of pharmaceutical policies and economic strategies. METHODS: The researcher searched five scholarly databases: Medline, BioMed Central (BMC), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), ProQuest, and PubMed for the reviewed articles. The search and selection of the articles involved searching each of the databases using specific keywords and a combination of them to form phrases and the Boolean search string. The researcher adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in developing this study. RESULTS: From the original search, a total of 537 articles emerged from which 17 articles remained upon screening. Findings show that the community pharmacy role has expanded over the past years to enable pharmacists serve diverse roles, but there is a high lack of involvement of these stakeholders in the planning and execution of policies. The pharmaceutical and health-care sectors operate in a way that does not recognize nor engage community pharmacists sufficiently in the policy planning and execution. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant stakeholders need to create an enabling and supportive environment for utilizing the abilities, knowledge, and skills of community pharmacists in policy planning and execution.

From the European Medicines Agency to Project Orbis: new activities and challenges to facilitate UK oncology drug approval following Brexit.

The departure of the UK from the European Union (EU) and affiliated European regulatory bodies, including the European Medicines Agency, on Dec 31, 2020, has resulted in the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency becoming an independent national regulator. This change has required a fundamental transformation of the UK drug regulatory landscape, creating both opportunities and challenges for future development of oncology drugs. New UK pharmaceutical policies have sought to make the UK an attractive market for drug development and regulatory review, by offering expedited review pathways coupled to strong collaborative relations with other leading international medicines regulators, outside of Europe. Oncology is a key global therapy area for both drug development and regulatory approval, and the UK Government has been keen to show regulatory innovation and international collaboration through approval of new cancer medicines. In this Policy Review, we examine the new UK regulatory frameworks, policies, and global collaborations affecting new oncology drug approvals after departure from the EU. We explore some of the challenges that might lie ahead as the UK creates new and independent regulatory review and approval processes for the next generation of cancer medicines.

Confundibilidad marcaria en los productos farmacéuticos / Trademark confusion in pharmaceutical products

Se describe una visión multidisciplinaria del problema de confundibilidad de las marcas en los productos farmacéuticos y su repercusión en la salud de la población. Expresan sus opiniones expertos de distintos países, que fueron convocados por la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO) en un conversatorio realizado en octubre de 2022. Se tratan diversos aspectos: a) el riesgo de confusión en la identificación del producto farmacéutico, b) el registro de marcas farmacéuticas en Brasil y a nivel europeo, c) los medicamentos LASA y los riesgos de similitudes de fonética y grafía, d) el examen de patentes de invención y el estudio de marcas de productos farmacéuticos. Todo ello en el marco de su relación con la seguridad del paciente. (AU)

A multidisciplinary vision of the problem of confusion of brands in pharmaceutical products and its impact on the health of the population is described. Experts from different countries who were convened by the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO) expressed their opinions in a discussion held in October 2022. Various aspects were discussed: a) the risk of confusion in the identification of the pharmaceutical product, b) the registration of pharmaceutical trademarks in Brazil and at a European level, c) LASA drugs and the risks of phonetic and spelling similarities, d) the examination of invention patents and the study of trademarks of pharmaceutical products. All this within the framework of its relationship with patient safety. (AU)

Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.

BACKGROUND: Drug insurance schemes are systems that provide access to medicines on a prepaid basis and could potentially improve access to essential medicines and reduce out-of-pocket payments for vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on drug use, drug expenditure, healthcare utilisation and healthcare outcomes of alternative policies for regulating drug insurance schemes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, nine other databases, and two trials registers between November 2014 and September 2020, including a citation search for included studies on 15 September 2021 using Web of Science. We screened reference lists of all the relevant reports that we retrieved and reports from the Background section. Authors of relevant papers, relevant organisations, and discussion lists were contacted to identify additional studies, including unpublished and ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised trials, non-randomised trials, interrupted time-series studies (including controlled ITS [CITS] and repeated measures [RM] studies), and controlled before-after (CBA) studies. Two review authors independently assessed the search results and reference lists of relevant reports, retrieved the full text of potentially relevant references and independently applied the inclusion criteria to those studies. We resolved disagreements by discussion, and when necessary by including a third review author. We excluded studies of the following pharmaceutical policies covered in other Cochrane Reviews: those that determined how decisions were made about which conditions or drugs were covered; those that placed restrictions on reimbursement for drugs that were covered; and those that regulated out-of-pocket payments for drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies and assessed risk of bias for each study, with disagreements being resolved by consensus. We used the criteria suggested by  Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC)  to assess the risk of bias of included studies. For randomised trials, non-randomised trials and controlled before-after studies, we planned to report relative effects. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported the risk ratio (RR) when possible and adjusted for baseline differences in the outcome measures. For interrupted time series and controlled interrupted time-series studies, we computed changes along two dimensions: change in level; and change in slope. We undertook a structured synthesis following the EPOC guidance on this topic, describing the range of effects found in the studies for each category of outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 58 studies that met the inclusion criteria (25 interrupted time-series studies and 33 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (54) assessed a single policy implemented in the United States (US) healthcare system: Medicare Part D. The other four assessed other drug insurance schemes from Canada and the US, but only one of them provided analysable data for inclusion in the quantitative synthesis. The introduction of drug insurance schemes may increase prescription drug use (low-certainty evidence). On the other hand, Medicare Part D may decrease drug expenditure measured as both out-of-pocket spending and total drug spending (low-certainty evidence). Regarding healthcare utilisation, drug insurance policies (such as Medicare Part D) may lead to a small increase in visits to the emergency department. However, it is uncertain whether this type of policy increases or decreases hospital admissions or outpatient visits by beneficiaries of the scheme because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Likewise, it is uncertain if the policy increases or reduces health outcomes such as mortality because the certainty of the evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of drug insurance schemes such as Medicare Part D in the US health system may increase prescription drug use and may decrease out-of-pocket payments by the beneficiaries of the scheme and total drug expenditures. It may also lead to a small increase in visits to the emergency department by the beneficiaries of the policy. Its effects on other healthcare utilisation outcomes and on health outcomes are uncertain because of the very low certainty of the evidence. The applicability of this evidence to settings outside US healthcare is limited.

Leftover Opioid Analgesics and Disposal Following Ambulatory Pediatric Surgeries in the Context of a Restrictive Opioid-Prescribing Policy.

BACKGROUND: Opioid analgesics are commonly prescribed for postoperative analgesia following pediatric surgery and often result in leftover opioid analgesics in the home. To reduce the volume of leftover opioids and overall community opioid burden, the State of Tennessee enacted a policy to reduce initial opioid prescribing to a 3-day supply for most acute pain incidents. We aimed to evaluate the extent of leftover opioid analgesics following pediatric ambulatory surgeries in the context of a state-mandated restrictive opioid-prescribing policy. We also aimed to evaluate opioid disposal rates, methods of disposal, and reasons for nondisposal. METHODS: Study personnel contacted the parents of 300 pediatric patients discharged with an opioid prescription following pediatric ambulatory surgery. Parents completed a retrospective telephone survey regarding opioid use and disposal. Data from the survey were combined with data from the medical record to evaluate proportion of opioid doses prescribed that were left over. RESULTS: The final analyzable sample of 185 patients (62% response rate) were prescribed a median of 12 opioid doses (interquartile range [IQR], 12-18), consumed 2 opioid doses (IQR, 0-4), and had 10 opioid doses left over (IQR, 7-13). Over 90% (n = 170 of 185) of parents reported they had leftover opioid analgesics, with 83% of prescribed doses left over. A significant proportion (29%, n = 54 of 185) of parents administered no prescribed opioids after surgery. Less than half (42%, n = 71 of 170) of parents disposed of the leftover opioid medication, most commonly by flushing down the toilet, pouring down the sink, or throwing in the garbage. Parents retaining leftover opioids (53%, n = 90 of 170) were most likely to keep them in an unlocked location (68%, n = 61 of 90). Parents described forgetfulness and worry that their child will experience pain in the future as primary reasons for not disposing of the leftover opioid medication. CONCLUSIONS: Despite Tennessee's policy aimed at reducing leftover opioids, a significant proportion of prescribed opioids were left over following pediatric ambulatory surgeries. A majority of parents did not engage in safe opioid disposal practices. Given the safety risks related to leftover opioids in the home, further interventions to improve disposal rates and tailor opioid prescribing are warranted after pediatric surgery.

Pharmaceutical patent term extension and patent prosecution in Brazil (1997-2018) / Extensão do prazo de vigência e tramitação de patentes farmacêuticas no Brasil (1997-2018) / Extensión de la vigencia y tramitación de patentes farmacéuticas en Brasil (1997-2018)

In Brazil, if patent prosecution takes more than 10 years, this extra period is added to the regular 20-year term. This paper analyses all pharmaceutical patents granted by the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) with term extension and later discusses some intellectual property and health policy implications. On average, pharmaceutical patent applications wait seven years after substantive examination is requested before being examined, which takes only three and a half years. Furthermore, the role of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) in providing prior consent has a marginal effect in prolonging the prosecution. Therefore, the extension of pharmaceutical patents' term is caused by the number of pending applications per examiner, which halts the prosecution for double the time it takes to examine the applications. Thus, proper solutions should focus on reducing the backlog per examiner at the INPI, which has caused the extension of 92% of the pharmaceutical patents in three and a half years, on average. We concluded that the Brazilian pharmaceutical patenting policy is biased towards the patentee. This imbalance will only be effectively corrected when the INPI is financially and administratively autonomous to reduce the ratio between the pharmaceutical patent application backlog and the number of examiners.

No Brasil, quando a tramitação de uma patente demora mais de 10 anos, esse tempo adicional é acrescentado à vigência regular de 20 anos. Este artigo analisa todas as patentes farmacêuticas concedidas pelo Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (INPI) com prorrogação de prazo, e em seguida discute algumas implicações para políticas de propriedade intelectual e de saúde. Em média, os pedidos de patente farmacêuticas esperam sete anos entre o requerimento do exame e o início da análise, que leva apenas três anos e meio. Além do mais, o papel da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) na anuência prévia tem efeito marginal sobre o período de tramitação. Portanto, a extensão da vigência das patentes farmacêuticas é provocada pelo alto número de pedidos pendentes por examinador, o que atrasa em até duas vezes o tempo que leva para examinar os pedidos. Logo, soluções adequadas devem focar na redução do acúmulo de pedidos pendentes por examinador no INPI, que causou a extensão de 92% das patentes farmacêuticas em três anos, em média. Conclui-se que a política brasileira para patentes farmacêuticas apresenta um viés em favor do titular da patente. Esse desequilíbrio só será sanado efetivamente quando o INPI tiver autonomia financeira e administrativa para reduzir a razão entre o backlog de pedidos de patentes farmacêuticas e o número de examinadores.

En Brasil, si la tramitación de una patente tarda más de 10 años, este período extra se añade a la vigencia regular de 20 años. Este trabajo analiza todas las patentes farmacéuticas otorgadas por la Oficina de Patentes Brasileña (INPI) con extensión de su vigencia, y discute posteriormente algumas implicaciones para las políticas de propriedade intelectual y de salud. En promedio, las solicitudes de patentes farmacéuticas esperan siete años desde el requerimiento del examen antes de ser examinadas, lo que tarda solamente tres años y medio. Asimismo, el rol de la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (Anvisa) al dar su consentimiento previo tiene un efecto marginal para prolongar la tramitación. Por ello, la extensión de la vigencia de las patentes farmacéuticas está provocada por el número de solicitudes pendientes por examinador, lo que paraliza la tramitación por el doble de período de tiempo que cuesta examinar las solicitudes. Así pues, las soluciones apropiadas deberían centrarse en reducir el acúmulo de solicitudes pendientes por examinador en el INPI, que ha provocado la extensión de la patente en un 92% de las solicitudes farmacéuticas en tres años y meio, en promedio. Se concluye que la política de patentes farmacéuticas brasileña está sesgada hacia el titular de la patente. Este desequilibrio solo se corregirá efectivamente cuando el INPI tenga autonomía financeira y administrativa para reducir la razón entre el backlog de solicitudes de patentes farmacéuticas y el número de examinadores.

Memoria institucional 2016 ­ 2021: Dirección General de Medicamentos, Insumos y Drogas - DIGEMID / Institutional memory 2016 ­ 2021: General Directorate of Medicines, Supplies and Drugs - DIGEMID

La publicación describe los resultados del trabajo desarrollado por la DIGEMID en el último quinquenio (2016 ­ 2021), líneas de acción: Regulación, control y vigilancia de productos farmacéuticos, dispositivos médicos, productos sanitarios y establecimientos farmacéuticos; acceso y uso racional de medicamentos, autorizaciones sanitarias, entre otras, cuya complejidad en su manejo ha demandado optimizar de manera constante los procesos y servicios que brinda la DIGEMID.

Tobacco Control Strategies Enrich the National Strategic Plan on Prevention and Control of Cancer in Sri Lanka.

The National Cancer Control Programme Sri Lanka is the main government organization and focal point for coordinating the national response to prevention and control of cancer activities. Present National strategic plan on Cancer Prevention and Control (2020-2024) was developed by multi-sectoral expert groups. The present strategy derives its mandate from the overarching National policy documents including the NATA Act. Strategic objectives one and two of the National Strategic Plan identified the tobacco control measures. Several databases were searched to find out the relevant literature relevant to tobacco control strategies in Sri Lanka and the rest was collected from the university libraries, experts, and key persons in the field from the legal, and health sectors. It was identified more than 200 documents relevant to tobacco control. Strong legal legislations are available for measures to reduce the demand for tobacco products. Those are Protection from exposure to tobacco smoke, regulation of the contents of tobacco products, regulation of tobacco product disclosures, packaging and labeling of tobacco products, tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship, licit trade in tobacco products, sales to under 21, Provision of support for economically viable alternative activities. These legislations are covering by the NATA act. New formula for tobacco taxation was submitted to the Ministry of Health. Conclusion: Strong tobacco controlling laws and legislations are available in Sri Lanka that supports achieving one and two of the strategic objectives of the National strategic plan on cancer prevention and control in Sri Lanka. Policies are needed to regularize the increased tax rates to adjust for inflation and Gross Domestic Product. WHO has categorized Sri Lanka as one of the countries which can likely achieve a decrease in tobacco smoking prevalence (30%) by 2025.

Implementation of MPOWER Package in the South-East Asia Region: Evidence from the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic (2009-2021).

The WHO MPOWER package is a set of six evidence-based and cost-effective measures which was introduced on 7 February 2008 to facilitate the implementation of the provisions of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control at the ground level. These measures are: Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies (M); Protecting people from tobacco smoke (P); Offering help to quit tobacco use (O); Warning about the dangers of tobacco (W); Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (E); and Raising taxes on tobacco (R). Since its launch, the MPOWER package has become the guiding principle for all the countries of the South-East Asia Region in their crusade against the tobacco epidemic. This review article tracks the implementation of the MPOWER measures in the 11 member countries of the Region based on the last seven WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic (GTCR), i.e., GTCR2/2009-GTCR8/2021. This is with an aim to enable the countries to review their progress in implementing the MPOWER measures and to take steps to improve their advancement towards reducing the demand for tobacco products at the country level.

Desafios na gestão de medicamentos de alto preço no SUS: avaliação da Assistência Farmacêutica em São Paulo, Brasil / Challenges in the management of high-priced drugs in the SUS: evaluation of Pharmaceutical Policy in São Paulo, Brazil

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a capacidade de gestão do Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica (CEAF) no estado de São Paulo (ESP), sob os aspectos organizacional, operacional e sustentabilidade. O desenho do estudo foi uma investigação avaliativa, com adaptação de um modelo teórico e protocolo de indicadores desenvolvido para aplicação em âmbito nacional, e validado (Grupo Nominal e Comitê Tradicional) para a aplicação na realidade do ESP. A coleta de dados, em 35 unidades, foi realizada em 2017 e 2018 e contemplou todas as áreas que participam da gestão/execução do CEAF do estado, em seu âmbito central e regional. A avaliação da capacidade de gestão foi fundamentada na análise crítica dos resultados obtidos, analisando suas fragilidades e as potencialidades. Verificou-se que a capacidade de gestão foi positiva na dimensão operacional, com desafios concentrados nas demais dimensões. Os resultados demonstraram maiores investimentos e desenvolvimento em aspectos técnicos da assistência farmacêutica, mas deficitárias em relação a aspectos como: monitoramento de resultados clínicos, regulamentação, infraestrutura e comunicação com os atores envolvidos.

Abstract The aim of this study is to evaluate the management capacity of the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Services (CEAF, in Portuguese) in the state of São Paulo (SP), according to the organizational, operational and sustainability aspects. The study was designed as an evaluative investigation, with the adoption of a theoretical model and protocol of indicators developed for application at the national level and validated (Nominal Group and Traditional Committee) for application in the reality of the SP. The data collection in the 35 CEAF units was carried out in 2017 and 2018, and covered all technical areas that participate in the management/execution of CEAF, in both its central and regional scopes. The assessment of management capacity was based on a critical analysis of the obtained results, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses. After collecting data from 35 CEAF units, it was found that the management capacity was positive in the operational dimension with challenges concentrated in the other dimensions. The results showed greater investments and development in the technical aspects of pharmaceutical services, but deficiencies in such areas as the monitoring of clinical results, infrastructure, regulation, and communication with the actors involved.

Assessing the Impact of US Food and Drug Administration Breakthrough Therapy Designation Timing on Trial Characteristics and Development Speed.

The US Congress created the Breakthrough Therapy designation in 2012 to expedite drug development and review through efficient clinical trial design and intensive interaction with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewers. Yet, of the 116 pivotal trials supporting Breakthrough-designated drugs approved 2013-2018, 96 (83%) were already underway or completed when the designation was granted, limiting the potential of the designation to influence trial design. We found no difference between these trials and the 20 (17%) that had not yet begun when the designation was granted (which had greater potential to be impacted by the designation) with respect to phase, size, intervention model (single-arm vs. multi-arm), or use of surrogate end points under the Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway. This finding suggests that, in contrast to previous studies, observed trial characteristics were not likely attributable to the designation, and instead other factors such as disease category (e.g., oncology) may be driving both trial design and Breakthrough designation. The 20 trials in our sample that began after designation was granted were, however, over 8 months shorter than trials of nondesignated drugs. This suggests that designations granted early in clinical development may reduce trial time by influencing aspects of clinical programs other than design characteristics, such as timelines for FDA responses. Alternately, certain drugs may be more likely to both receive an early designation and have a shorter trial duration, for example, because of therapeutic category or large effect size.

A Study of Regulatory Challenges of Pediatric Oncology Phase I/II Trial Submissions and Guidance on Protocol Development.

The purpose of this study was to identify key deficiencies in pediatric oncology early phase clinical trial protocols in Germany and to provide guidance for efficient trial protocol development. A systematic review of the response letters of German competent authorities (CAs) and Ethics Committees to phase I/II pediatric oncology trial submissions in the period from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Documents were requested from all five Society for Paediatric Oncology and Haematology in Germany (GPOH) phase I/II trial networks plus all nine German Innovative Therapies for Children with Consortium Cancer (ITCC) centers. A blinded dataset containing aggregated data from 33 studies was analyzed for validation. All deficiencies were reviewed, listed, and weighted using a structured matrix according to frequency, category, significance, and feasibility. In total, documents of 17 trials from 6 different sites were collected. Two hundred fifty deficiencies identified by the CAs were identified and categorized into eight categories. "Toxicity and safety" was the most prominent category (27.6%), followed by "Manufacturing and Import" (18%). The majority of deficiencies were categorized as minor and potential measures as easy to address, but an important group of major and difficult to implement deficiencies was also identified. The blinded validation dataset confirmed these findings. The majority of the EC deficiencies could be resolved by changing the wording in the patient-facing documents. In conclusion, this study was able to detect a pattern of key deficiencies. Most of the shortcomings can be anticipated by minor changes in the protocol and increased awareness can prevent time-consuming revisions, withdrawals, or even rejections. A corresponding guideline describing key regulatory aspects is provided.

Radiopharmaceuticals: An insight into the latest advances in medical uses and regulatory perspectives.

The growing armamentarium of potential radioisotopes and increased demand for radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) have catapulted their biomedical applications on a trajectory of higher growth in the modern healthcare establishment. Nuclear medicine technology is now regarded as an essential tool for diagnosis, palliation, therapy, and theranostic applications. The associated radiation safety issues need to be emphasized in the form of adequate regulatory action to warrant their safe and effective use. The RPs attracts considerable attention from both pharmaceutical and nuclear regulators due to their constituent pharmaceutical and radioactive components. So, a critical examination of applications of RPs, the latest advances in their development, and the existing regulatory guidelines for RPs have been carried out. This review presents a brief overview of RPs and recent studies on their diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic applications. Comprehensive comparative information on regulatory perspectives of RPs in major pharmaceutical jurisdictions such as the United States (US), the European Union (EU), and India reveals ambiguities and heterogeneity. The present studies discuss the importance of RPs in the current healthcare domain, their recent applications, and strive to intensify the concern for an ambient and harmonized regulatory setup.