Surgical Residents' Perspective on Informed Consent-How Does It Compare With Attending Surgeons?

BACKGROUND: The informed consent discussion (ICD) is a compulsory element of clinical practice. Surgical residents are often tasked with obtaining informed consent, but formal instruction is not included in standard curricula. This study aims to examine attitudes of surgeons and residents concerning ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey regarding ICD was administered to residents and attending surgeons at an academic medical center with an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery residency. RESULTS: In total, 44 of 64 (68.75%) residents and 37 of 50 (72%) attending surgeons participated. Most residents felt comfortable consenting for elective (93%) and emergent (82%) cases, but attending surgeons were less comfortable with resident-led ICD (51% elective, 73% emergent). Resident comfort increased with postgraduate year (PGY) (PGY1 = 39%, PGY5 = 85%). A majority of participants (80% attending surgeons, 73% residents) believed resident ICD skills should be formally evaluated, and most residents in PGY1 (61%) requested formal instruction. High percentages of residents (86%) and attendings (100%) believed that ICD skills were best learned from direct observation of attending surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Resident comfort with ICD increases as residents advance through training. Residents acknowledge the importance of their participation in this process, and in particular, junior residents believe formal instruction is important. Attending surgeons are not universally comfortable with resident-led ICDs, particularly for elective surgeries. Efforts for improving ICD education including direct observation between attending surgeons and residents and formal evaluation may benefit the residency curriculum.

The effects of nonconventional palliative and end-of-life care during COVID-19 pandemic on mental health-Junior doctors' perspective.

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way doctors approach palliative and end-of-life care, which has undoubtedly affected the mental health of patients, families, and health care professionals. Given these circumstances, doctors working on the front line are vulnerable to moral injury and compassion fatigue. This is a reflection of 2 junior doctors experiencing firsthand demands of caring for patients during the outbreak. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Índice C en médicos de dos centros hospitalarios chilenos según el test de competencia moral de Lind / Assessment of moral competence of physicians

Background: Moral competence (MC) in physicians is fundamental, given the increasing complexity of medicine. The "Moral Competence Test" (MCT © Lind) evaluates this feature and its indicator is the C Index (CI). Aim: To explore moral competence and its associated factors among physicians working in Chile. Material and Methods: The MCT was answered by 236 physicians from two medical centers who voluntarily participated in the study. Besides the test, participants completed an encrypted form giving information about gender, years in practice and post-graduate studies. Results: The average CI value of the participants was 20,9. Post-graduate studies had a significant positive influence on CI. There was a significant decrease in CI, between 16 and 20 years of professional exercise. Gender and the area of post-graduate studies did not have a significant influence. Conclusions: The studied physicians showed a wide range of CI which was positively affected by the postgraduate studies performed. The years of professional practice had a negative influence. Expanding training opportunities during professional practice could have a positive effect on CM as measured by CI.

Necesidades de aprendizaje en bioética de residentes y especialistas de Nefrología en Cuba / The needs of bioethics learning in specialists and residents in nephrology specialty in Cuba

Introducción: La enfermedad renal, como proceso crónico tratable pero progresivo a la terminalidad, condiciona la necesidad de que los médicos conozcan y apliquen el enfoque bioético en su desempeño profesional. Objetivo: Identificar las necesidades de aprendizaje en aspectos bioéticos por médicos especialistas y residentes en Nefrología. Material y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal con 81 médicos (41 especialistas y 40 residentes) en tres servicios de Nefrología del país entre 2014-2015. Se utilizó una encuesta estructurada para la recogida de la información y se emplearon diferentes métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos para el procesamiento de la información. En el procesamiento estadístico se empleó el software R. Resultados: Los cuatros principios de la Bioética anglosajona fueron reconocidos como importante para la práctica profesional dentro del hospital (9.4 puntos), así como la implicación personal en su aplicación (9.89 puntos) sin diferencias significativas entre especialistas y residentes. Se reconoce falta de capacitación en diferentes temas relacionados con la Bioética como: cuidados paliativos (82,75 por ciento), habilidades comunicativas (80,2 por ciento), principio de proporcionalidad terapéutica (72,83 por ciento), conflictos ético-clínicos (72,83 por ciento), planes de cuidados continuos en estos pacientes (76,54 por ciento), cuidados avanzados y al final de la vida (81,18 por ciento) y prevención del Burnout (81,48 por ciento), mayores en residentes que en los especialistas, en especial, la proporcionalidad terapéutica (p= 0.007) y los conflictos ético-clínicos (p= 0.029). Conclusiones: Se otorga gran importancia a los aspectos bioéticos aplicados a la práctica nefrológica. Se identifican necesidades de aprendizaje modificables en áreas específicas mediante planes de perfeccionamiento educativo en el postgrado(AU)

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease as a treatable process but progressive to end stage, determines the need for physicians know and apply a bioethical focus on their professional performance. Objective: To identify learning needs in bioethical issues by nephrologists. Material and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with 81 physicians (41 specialists and 40 residents) in three nephrology services in the country between 2014-2015 was performed. A structured questionnaire for collecting information and different quantitative and qualitative methods for processing information was used. For the statistical processing, R software was used. Results: Anglo-Saxon bioethics' four principles were recognized as important for professional practice at the hospital (9.4 points) as well as personal involvement in its implementation (9.89 points) with no significant differences between specialists and residents. Lack of training is recognized in various bioethics issues such as palliative care (82.75 percent), communication skills (80.2 percent), therapeutic principle of proportionality (72.83 percent), ethical-clinical conflicts (72, 83 percent), continuous care plans in these patients (76.54 percent), advanced care and end of life (81.18 percent) and prevention of Burnout (81.48 percent), higher in residents than in specialists; especially therapeutic proportionality (p = 0.007) and clinical - ethical conflict (p = 0.029). Conclusions: Great importance to bioethical aspects applied to nephrology practice is granted. Customizable learning's needs are identified in specific areas through education plans development during post graduated learning(AU)

Ethical and educational considerations in coding hand surgeries.

PURPOSE: To assess treatment coding knowledge and practices among residents, fellows, and attending hand surgeons. METHODS: Through the use of 6 hypothetical cases, we developed a coding survey to assess coding knowledge and practices. We e-mailed this survey to residents, fellows, and attending hand surgeons. In additionally, we asked 2 professional coders to code these cases. RESULTS: A total of 71 participants completed the survey out of 134 people to whom the survey was sent (response rate = 53%). We observed marked disparity in codes chosen among surgeons and among professional coders. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that coding knowledge, not just its ethical application, had a major role in coding procedures accurately. Surgical coding is an essential part of a hand surgeon's practice and is not well learned during residency or fellowship. Whereas ethical issues such as deliberate unbundling and upcoding may have a role in inaccurate coding, lack of knowledge among surgeons and coders has a major role as well. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Coding has a critical role in every hand surgery practice. Inconstancies among those polled in this study reveal that an increase in education on coding during training and improvement in the clarity and consistency of the Current Procedural Terminology coding rules themselves are needed.

Understanding doctors' ethical challenges as role virtue conflicts.

This paper argues that doctors' ethical challenges can be usefully conceptualised as role virtue conflicts. The hospital environment requires doctors to be simultaneously good doctors, good team members, good learners and good employees. I articulate a possible set of role virtues for each of these four roles, as a basis for a virtue ethics approach to analysing doctors' ethical challenges. Using one junior doctor's story, I argue that understanding doctors' ethical challenges as role virtue conflicts enables recognition of important moral considerations that are overlooked by other approaches to ethical analysis.

What contributes to internists' willingness to disclose medical errors?

BACKGROUND: The release of the report 'To err is human' put medical safety and the disclosure of errors to the forefront of the health care agenda. Disclosure of medical errors by physicians is vital in this process. We studied the role of background and social psychological factors in internists' willingness to report medical errors. METHODS: Survey among a random sample of internists from five teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, all internists and internists in training at the Departments of Internal Medicine of the participating hospitals. RESULTS: Questionnaires were received from 115 participants (response 51%). The willingness to disclose was related to the severity of the error, with the majority of near misses not reported to the head of department or the hospital error committees. Errors were more often reported to colleagues. Positive factors in favour of disclosing were reported more often than negative ones prohibiting disclosure. Motivation, behavioural control and social barriers were related to the disclosure of errors. CONCLUSION: Personal and social issues contributing to the will and addressed properly to stimulate disclosure. The creation of an atmosphere where disclosing errors is routine seems vital. In addition, it is essential to create a departmental culture where medical errors are discussed in a non-judgmental, safe environment. In order to improve reporting of medical errors, more emphasis should be placed on the individual barriers that preclude adequate reporting.

Barriers to conducting advance care discussions for children with life-threatening conditions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Advance care discussions (ACD) occur infrequently or are initiated late in the course of illness. Although data exist regarding barriers to ACD among the care of adult patients, few pediatric data exist. The goal of this study was to identify barriers to conducting ACD for children with life-threatening conditions. METHODS: Physicians and nurses from practice settings where advance care planning typically takes place were surveyed to collect data regarding their attitudes and behaviors regarding ACD. RESULTS: A total of 266 providers responded to the survey: 107 physicians and 159 nurses (54% response rate). The top 3 barriers were: unrealistic parent expectations, differences between clinician and patient/parent understanding of prognosis, and lack of parent readiness to have the discussion. Nurses identified lack of importance to clinicians (P = .006) and ethical considerations (P < .001) as impediments more often than physicians. Conversely, physicians believed that not knowing the right thing to say (P = .006) was more often a barrier. There are also perceived differences among specialties. Cardiac ICU providers were more likely to report unrealistic clinician expectations (P < .001) and differences between clinician and patient/parent understanding of prognosis (P = .014) as common barriers to conducting ACD. Finally, 71% of all clinicians believed that ACD happen too late in the patient's clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians perceive parent prognostic understanding and attitudes as the most common barriers to conducting ACD. Educational interventions aimed at improving clinician knowledge, attitudes, and skills in addressing these barriers may help health care providers overcome perceived barriers.

The doctor and the market: about the influence of market reforms on the professional medical ethics of surgeons and general practitioners in the Netherlands.

To explore whether market reforms in a health care system affect medical professional ethics of hospital-based specialists on the one hand and physicians in independent practices on the other. Qualitative interviews with 27 surgeons and 28 general practitioners in The Netherlands, held 2-3 years after a major overhaul of the Dutch health care system involving several market reforms. Surgeons now regularly advertise their work (while this was forbidden in the past) and pay more attention to patients with relatively minor afflictions, thus deviating from codes of ethics that oblige physicians to treat each other as brothers and to treat patients according to medical need. Dutch GPs have abandoned their traditional reticence and their fear of medicalization. They now seem to treat more in accordance with patients' preferences and less in accordance with medical need. Market reforms do affect medical professional principles, and it is doubtful whether these changes were intended when Dutch policy makers decided to introduce market elements in the health care system. Policy makers in other countries considering similar reforms should pay attention to these results.

Conflict of credentialing: accolade or unfair trade.

The newly appointed chief of surgery at an open-staff hospital received an application for vascular privileges from a senior general surgeon who took a period of additional fellowship in vascular surgery at a nonacademic regional medical center. The fellowship does not make him board eligible in vascular surgery, but he has maintained his general surgery board certification and the pertinent bylaws do not specifically state which certification is required, only that the surgeon must be board certified and have additional training in vascular surgery. He is a member of a large politically powerful group practice that apparently wants to refer their substantial number of vascular cases internally. The chief of surgery finished vascular surgery training locally 3 years ago. The applicant has a checkered past, with multiple lawsuits and in-house investigations of cases with poor outcomes. The credentialing procedure is that the chief of service makes a recommendation to the chief of staff who makes a recommendation to the board of directors for approval. The chief of staff, who will make the final recommendation to the hospital board of directors, is a member of the applicant's group practice. What recommendation should the chief of vascular surgery make to the chief of staff?

End-of-life decisions in the newborn period: attitudes and practices of doctors and nurses.

The aim of our study was to assess the attitudes and practices of doctors and nurses about end-of-life decisions and compare our results with those observed in different European countries. The data was collected from nurses and doctors, using a standardized questionnaire adapted from the EURONIC study. A total of 250 structured questionnaires were delivered, and 135 (77%) of them were accepted for analysis. The end-of-life decision was taken in 39.4% of the hospitals and personal involvement was 40%. Although an ethical committee was present in the hospitals of 61.5% of responders, a written policy was present in only 3.1% of the units. The mean attitude score was 6.5. Seventy-five percent of the contributors agreed that everything possible should be done to ensure a neonate's survival regardless of the prognosis and 65.2% of responders believed that costs of health care should not affect nontreatment decisions. Most of the responders (65.2%) agreed that severe mental disability as an outcome was equal to or worse than death. In patients in whom medical intervention would be futile, or would not offer sufficient benefit to justify the burdens imposed, hospitals should set up a functional ethical committee in order to decide in matters of withholding or withdrawing intervention.

Attending physician work hours: ethical considerations and the last doctor standing.

Based at least in part on concerns for patient safety and evidence that long shifts are associated with an increased risk of physician error, residents' and fellows' work hours have been strictly limited for the past several years. Little attention has been paid, however, to excessive attending physician shift duration, although there seems to be no reason to assume that this common practice poses any less risk to patients. Potential justifications for allowing attending physicians to work without hourly limits include physician autonomy, workforce shortages in certain communities or subspecialties, continuity of care, and financial considerations. None of these clearly justify the apparent increased risk to patients, with the exception in some settings of workforce shortage. In many hospital settings, the practice of allowing attending physicians to work with no limit on shift duration could pose an unnecessary risk to patients.

Attitudes to euthanasia in ICUs and other hospital departments.

The aim of this study was to reveal doctors' and nurses' attitudes to euthanasia in intensive care units and surgical, internal medicine and paediatric units in Turkey. A total of 205 doctors and 206 nurses working in several hospitals in Istanbul participated. Data were collected by questionnaire and analysed using SPSS v. 12.0. Significantly higher percentages of doctors (35.3%) and nurses (26.6%) working in intensive care units encountered euthanasia requests than those working in other units. Doctors and nurses caring for terminally ill patients in intensive care units differed considerably in their attitudes to euthanasia and patient rights from other health care staff. Euthanasia should be investigated and put on the agenda for discussion in Turkey.

A residência médica: articulações entre a prática e o ensino / Medical residence: articulations between practice and teaching

O objetivo desta tese de doutorado é o estudo da residência médica e de suas articulações com o campo educacional e o da saúde. Propõe-se uma análise histórico - dialética, tomando como ponto de partida a articulação da medicina e da educação na estrutura social. Parte-se da concepção segundo a qual a prática e o saber no campo educacional e na saúde estão ligados à transformação histórica do processo de produção econômica. Essa compreensão remete à chamada determinação em última instância: a estrutura econômica determina o lugar e a forma de articulação da medicina e da educação na estrutura social. Para compreender as peculiaridades do ensino e da residência médica no Brasil faz-se uma caracterização da assistência médica, sobretudo do papel assumido pelo Estado na configuração do campo: primeiro, a adoção de um sistema em que compete ao Estado a responsabilidade pela universalização da atenção básica, através de serviços próprios ou em parceria com organizações não governamentais; segundo, a atenção especializada, com maior incorporação tecnológica, seria prestada pelo setor privado, mediante incentivos concedidos pelo Estado. Dessa divisão, resulta, no desenho atual, ao invés de um único sistema, a conformação de dois ou mais sistemas de saúde, em que a segmentação da assistência implica em práticas diferenciadas. O efeito desta divisão no mercado de trabalho repercute na escola e na residência médicas. A residência, em particular, por suas características de treinamento em serviço, responde diretamente aos condicionantes do mundo do trabalho, reproduzindo o modelo de prática hegemônica.

Medical error disclosure among pediatricians: choosing carefully what we might say to parents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether and how pediatricians would disclose serious medical errors to parents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: St Louis, Missouri, and Seattle, Washington. PARTICIPANTS: University-affiliated hospital and community pediatricians and pediatric residents. Main Exposure Anonymous 11-item survey administered between July 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004, containing 1 of 2 scenarios (less or more apparent to the child's parent) in which the respondent had caused a serious medical error. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician's intention to disclose the error to a parent and what information the physician would disclose to the parent about the error. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (205/369). Overall, 53% of all respondents (109) reported that they would definitely disclose the error, and 58% (108) would offer full details about how the error occurred. Twenty-six percent of all respondents (53) would offer an explicit apology, and 50% (103) would discuss detailed plans for preventing future recurrences of the error. Twice as many pediatricians who received the apparent error scenario would disclose the error to a parent (73% [75] vs 33% [34]; P < .001), and significantly more would offer an explicit apology (33% [34] vs 20% [20]; P = .04) compared with the less apparent error scenario. CONCLUSIONS: This study found marked variation in how pediatricians would disclose a serious medical error and revealed that they may be more willing to do so when the error is more apparent to the family. Further research on the impact of professional guidelines and innovative educational interventions is warranted to help improve the quality of error disclosure communication in pediatric settings.