Preoperative valgus deformity has twice the risk of failure as compared to varus deformity after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative valgus or varus deformity affected survivorship after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to quantify the risk factors for implant failure in a registry-based population. METHODS: The Emilia-Romagna Registry of Prosthetic Orthopedic Implants was examined regarding TKAs performed on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of valgus or varus deformity. Demographics, implant characteristic and survivorships were investigated and compared. A total of 2327 TKA procedures performed from 2000 to 2016 were included in the study. Six hundred and forty primary TKAs with a diagnosis of valgus deformity were evaluated with a median follow-up of 3.3 years; 1687 primary TKAs with a diagnosis of varus deformity were evaluated with a median follow-up of 2.5 years. RESULTS: Bi-compartmental, cemented posterior stabilised fixed-bearing implants were preferred. For both diagnoses, the implant survivorship rate was greater than 98% in the first year. However, the survival curve of the TKAs implanted for valgus deformity showed a greater slope in the first 3 years as compared to the survival curve of those implanted for varus deformity. Valgus deformity had a 2.1-fold higher risk for revision as compared with varus deformity. Infection was a major cause of implant failure in TKAs for varus deformity, 9/24 (37.5%), while its incidence was lower for valgus deformity, 1/21 (4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative valgus alignment showed a twofold risk of failure as compared to varus alignment after TKA. This should be considered in daily practice, and surgeons are called on to pay more attention when performing TKAs on such patients. Prospective randomised controlled trials are, therefore, necessary to better understand the role of preoperative coronal knee deformity in implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.

Acute and mid-term (six-week) effects of an ankle-foot-orthosis on biomechanical parameters, clinical outcomes and physical activity in knee osteoarthritis patients with varus malalignment.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a painful disease commonly caused by high loads on the articular cartilage. Orthotic interventions aim to reduce mechanical loading, thereby alleviating pain. Traditional orthotics appear effective, but high drop-out rates have been reported over prolonged periods. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a novel ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) on gait parameters, physical function and activity of KOA patients. METHODS: 29 clinically diagnosed KOA patients with varus malalignment wore an AFO for 6 weeks. Prior to and after the intervention period, 3D gait analysis, physical function tests and the KOOS questionnaire were administered. Physical activity was objectively assessed with accelerometers. RESULTS: The AFO immediately reduced the first peak of the knee adduction moment (KAM) and the KAM impulse by 41% and 19%. The knee flexion moment (KFM) was increased by 48%. After six weeks, the first KAM peak and KAM impulse were decreased by 27% and 19% while using the AFO. The KFM was increased by 71%. Furthermore, patients completed the functional tests faster (1.4-2.6%). The KOOS scores decreased significantly. No significant differences were found in physical activity parameters. SIGNIFICANCE: The six-week AFO application significantly reduced the KAM. The patients' physical function appeared improved; yet these improvements were only minor and therefore arguably clinically irrelevant. The KFM appeared to be negatively affected after six weeks, as were the scores on the KOOS subscales. In summary, even though the AFO reduced the KAM and improved physical function, the clinical benefit for KOA patients with varus malalignment after the 6-week AFO application is debatable.

Phenotypic Spectrum in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Due to Mutations in TMEM38B: Unraveling a Complex Cellular Defect.

Context: Recessive mutations in TMEM38B cause type XIV osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) by dysregulating intracellular calcium flux. Objectives: Clinical and bone material phenotype description and osteoblast differentiation studies. Design and Setting: Natural history study in pediatric research centers. Patients: Eight patients with type XIV OI. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical examinations included bone mineral density, radiographs, echocardiography, and muscle biopsy. Bone biopsy samples (n = 3) were analyzed using histomorphometry, quantitative backscattered electron microscopy, and Raman microspectroscopy. Cellular differentiation studies were performed on proband and control osteoblasts and normal murine osteoclasts. Results: Type XIV OI clinical phenotype ranges from asymptomatic to severe. Previously unreported features include vertebral fractures, periosteal cloaking, coxa vara, and extraskeletal features (muscular hypotonia, cardiac abnormalities). Proband lumbar spine bone density z score was reduced [median -3.3 (range -4.77 to +0.1; n = 7)] and increased by +1.7 (1.17 to 3.0; n = 3) following bisphosphonate therapy. TMEM38B mutant bone has reduced trabecular bone volume, osteoblast, and particularly osteoclast numbers, with >80% reduction in bone resorption. Bone matrix mineralization is normal and nanoporosity low. We demonstrate a complex osteoblast differentiation defect with decreased expression of early markers and increased expression of late and mineralization-related markers. Predominance of trimeric intracellular cation channel type B over type A expression in murine osteoclasts supports an intrinsic osteoclast defect underlying low bone turnover. Conclusions: OI type XIV has a bone histology, matrix mineralization, and osteoblast differentiation pattern that is distinct from OI with collagen defects. Probands are responsive to bisphosphonates and some show muscular and cardiovascular features possibly related to intracellular calcium flux abnormalities.

Outcome of extensive varus and valgus stem alignment in short-stem THA: clinical and radiological analysis using EBRA-FCA.

INTRODUCTION: The principle of implanting a calcar-guided short stem consists of an individual alignment alongside the medial calcar providing the ability of reconstructing varus and valgus anatomy in a great variety. However, still, there are broad concerns about the safety of extensive varus and valgus positioning in regard to stability, bony alterations, and periprosthetic fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 216 total hip arthroplasties using a calcar-guided short stem (optimys, Mathys Ltd.) in 162 patients were included. Depending on postoperative CCD angle, hips were divided into five groups (A-E). Varus- and valgus tilt and axial subsidence were assessed by "Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse"(EBRA-FCA, femoral component analysis) over a 2-year follow-up. The incidence of stress-shielding and cortical hypertrophy as well as clinical outcome [Harris Hip Score (HHS)] were reported. RESULTS: Postoperative CCD angles ranged from 117.9° to 145.6° and mean postoperative CCD angles in group A-E were 123.3°, 128.0°, 132.4°, 137.5°, and 142.5°, respectively. After 2 years, the mean varus/valgus tilt was -0.16°, 0.37°, 0.48°, 0.01°, and 0.86°, respectively (p = 0.502). Axial subsidence after 2 years was 1.20, 1.02, 1.44, 1.50, and 2.62 mm, respectively (p = 0.043). No periprosthetic fractures occurred and none of the stems had to be revised. Rates of stress-shielding and cortical hypertrophy as well as HHS showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Valgus alignment results in increased subsidence but does not affect the clinical outcome. There is no difference in stress shielding and cortical hypertrophy between the groups. The authors recommend long term monitoring of valgus aligned stems.

[How safe are orthoroentgenograms in determining the amount of correction for varus deformities?]. / Ortoröntgenogramlar varus diziliminin düzeltme miktari tespitinde ne kadar güvenilirdir?

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the effects of the distance of the legs from the midline on alignment and angles of the lower extremities in orthoroentgenograms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2012 and April 2013, 95 limbs of 56 patients with varus deformity who underwent orthoroentgenogram to identify the amount of joint laxity in two positions were included in this study. The initial X-ray was performed with the feet in contact, while the other was performed as the legs were abducted to be in line with the shoulders. For each orthoroentgenogram, the mean mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis, and joint line orientation angles were measured retrospectively. These measurements were repeated for 43 limbs with varus deformity >10°. RESULTS: In the orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact, the mean mechanical axis angle was 9.58°±5.7°, (0.20°; 26.0°), the mean anatomical axis angle 3.65°±6.14°, (-9.0°; 21.0°), and the mean joint line orientation angle -3.41°±2.52°, (-12.0°; 1.60°). In the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted, the mean mechanical axis angle was 7.73°±5.58°, (-3.0°; 23.0°), the mean anatomical axis angle 2.62°±5.87°, (-11.0°; 18.30°), and mean joint line orientation angle was -2.44°±2.41°, (-13.0°; 3.0°). The differences in the angles between the two positions were statistically significant (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that the mean values of mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis and the joint line orientation angle were higher in orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact than the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted in patients with varus gonarthrosis. We suggest that this may lead to mistakes in the preoperative planning. Ideal positions should be standardized to minimize possible problems.

The kinematics and stability of single-radius versus multi-radius femoral components related to mid-range instability after TKA.

There continues to be some dissatisfaction with the function of total knee arthroplasties (TKA). "Mid-range instability" has been linked to multi-radius femoral components allowing transient ligament slackness and instability during knee flexion. Single-radius designs have been introduced to avoid this. We compared the kinematics and stability of eight natural knees versus multi-radius and single-radius TKAs in vitro. The loading conditions imposed across the range of active knee extension were anterior-posterior drawer forces, internal-external rotation torques, and varus-valgus moments. Significant differences were not found between the biomechanical behavior of the two TKAs. Both were significantly different from the natural knee in allowing greater anterior drawer laxity near extension, probably caused by excision of the anterior cruciate ligament, but no difference occurred beyond 30° flexion. No differences were found for any of the other degrees-of-freedom of movement. A geometric analysis suggested that the multi-radius design may tense the MCL more than the single-radius in mid-flexion, contrary to expectation. These kinematic and stability tests did not find mid-range instability of the knees, and so they could not demonstrate enhanced mid-range stability of the single-radius TKA over the older multi-radius implant. This suggests that mid-range instability may relate to unrecognized ligament laxity during surgery, rather than being inherent to a specific feature of implant design.

Knee malalignment is associated with an increased risk for incident and enlarging bone marrow lesions in the more loaded compartments: the MOST study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of knee malalignment with occurrence of incident and enlarging bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and regression of BMLs. METHODS: Subjects from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study aged 50-79 years with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis were studied. Full-limb radiographs were taken at baseline and hip-knee-ankle mechanical axis was measured. Baseline and 30-month magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of knees (n = 1782) were semiquantitatively assessed for BMLs. Outcome was defined as a change in BML score in femoral/tibial condyle in medial/lateral compartments. Medial compartment in varus alignment and lateral compartment in valgus alignment were combined to form 'more loaded' compartment, while lateral compartment in valgus and medial compartment in varus were combined to form 'less loaded' compartment. Relative risk (RR) of BML score increase or decrease in relation to malalignment was estimated using a log linear regression model with the Poisson assumption, adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, physical activity scale for the elderly, race and clinic site. Further, results were stratified by ipsilateral meniscal and cartilage status at baseline. RESULTS: Baseline varus alignment was associated with higher risk of BML score increase from baseline to follow-up in the medial compartment [adjusted RRs (95%CI): 1.5 (1.2-1.9)] and valgus alignment in the lateral compartment [1.4 (1.0-2.1)]. Increase in BML score was more likely in the more loaded compartments [1.7 (1.4-2.0)] in malaligned knees. Regardless of ipsilateral cartilage or meniscus status, adjusted RR for BML score increase was higher in the more loaded compartments of malaligned knees than those with neutral alignment. Decrease in BML score was less likely in the more loaded compartments in malaligned knees [0.8 (0.7-1.0)]. CONCLUSION: Knee malalignment is associated with increased risk of incident and enlarging BMLs in the more loaded compartments of the tibiofemoral joint.

Accuracy of in situ neck-shaft angle and shortening measurements of the anatomically reduced, varus malreduced and shortened proximal femur: can we believe what we see on the postoperative films?

OBJECTIVES: Measuring the neck-shaft angle (NSA) and amount of shortening of the femoral neck on the anterior to posterior (AP) X-ray is important when treating proximal femur fractures. To compensate for proximal femoral external rotation, the X-rays need to be taken with the leg internally rotated, an act that cannot always be performed or verified. This study aims to define the utility of in situ AP X-ray in NSA and shortening measurements. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 50 patients undergoing abdominal CT scans were assessed for the in situ rotation of the femoral neck relative to the AP beam. Three proximal femur fracture Sawbones models were made and AP X-rays of the models were taken with changing proximal femur rotation. NSA and shortening were measured on all X-rays. RESULTS: In situ femoral neck rotation averaged 25.4±10.6° of external rotation (range, 0.9-51.8°, 80% of measurements less than 35°). NSA measurements varied less than 5° with less than 35° of rotation in all models, and were always greater than the true value. Femoral neck vertical length (VL) measurement was independent of proximal femur rotation whereas the horizontal length component was found to be highly dependent on the same. CONCLUSIONS: NSA measured on AP X-ray will be accurate to within 5° in 80% of patients with the hip left in situ and in 100% of the patients if the hip is internally rotated 15°. Measurement of significant varus or loss of VL of the femoral neck can be considered accurate regardless of leg rotation at the time of X-rays being taken.