Assessment of the potential of the MET inhibitor tepotinib to affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates.

Tepotinib is a highly selective, potent, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor, approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. The aims of this work were to investigate the potential for drug-drug interactions via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 or P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition. In vitro studies were conducted in human liver microsomes, human hepatocyte cultures and Caco-2 cell monolayers to investigate whether tepotinib or its major metabolite (MSC2571109A) inhibited or induced CYP3A4/5 or inhibited P-gp. Two clinical studies were conducted to investigate the effect of multiple dose tepotinib (500 mg once daily orally) on the single dose pharmacokinetics of a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate (midazolam 7.5 mg orally) and a P-gp substrate (dabigatran etexilate 75 mg orally) in healthy participants. Tepotinib and MSC2571109A showed little evidence of direct or time-dependent CYP3A4/5 inhibition (IC50 > 15 µM) in vitro, although MSC2571109A did show mechanism-based CYP3A4/5 inhibition. Tepotinib did not induce CYP3A4/5 activity in vitro, although both tepotinib and MSC2571109A increased CYP3A4 mRNA. In clinical studies, tepotinib had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or its metabolite 1'-hydroxymidazolam. Tepotinib increased dabigatran maximum concentration and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity by 38% and 51%, respectively. These changes were not considered to be clinically relevant. Tepotinib was considered safe and well tolerated in both studies. The potential of tepotinib to cause clinically relevant DDI with CYP3A4- or P-gp-dependent drugs at the clinical dose is considered low. Study 1 (midazolam): NCT03628339 (registered 14 August 2018). Study 2 (dabigatran): NCT03492437 (registered 10 April 2018).

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug-drug interactions of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban in the Chinese older adults.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is one of the major concerns for the clinical use of NOACs in the older adults considering that coexistence of multiple diseases and comorbidity were common. Current guidelines on the DDI management were established based on clinical studies conducted in healthy adults and mainly focus on the Caucasians, whereas systemic and ethnic differences may lead to distinct management in the Chinese older adults. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of aging on the DDI magnitude between P-gp and/or CYP3A4 inhibitors with dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban in older adults, providing additional information for the use in clinical practice. RESULTS: Compared with the simulated adult, the AUC of the simulated older adults increased by 42-88% (DABE) and 21-60% (rivaroxaban), respectively, during NOACs monotherapy. Simulation on DDIs predicted that verapamil and clarithromycin further increase the exposure of dabigatran by 29-72% and 40-47%, whereas clarithromycin, fluconazole, and ketoconazole increase the exposure of rivaroxaban by 21-30%, 16-24%, and 194-247% in the older adults. Overall, our simulation result demonstrated that aging and DDIs both increased the exposure of NOACs. However, aging does not have a drastic impact on the extent of DDIs. The DDI ratios of young and old older adults were similar to the adults and were also similar between Caucasians and Chinese. DISCUSSION: We further simulated the interactions under steady-state based on the EHRA guideline (2021). Our simulation results revealed that recommended reduced dosing regimen of dabigatran etexilate during comedication with verapamil and clarithromycin (110 and 75 mg BID for Chinese young and old older adults) will result in exposure (trough concentration) that was either slightly higher or similar to the trough concentration of patients with any bleeding events. Routine monitoring of bleeding risk is encouraged. Further studies on the use of rivaroxaban in Chinese older adults are warranted. CONCLUSION: Aging and DDI increases exposure of drug in Chinese older adults. However, aging does not have a drastic impact on the extent of DDIs. Clinical management of DDIs in Chinese older adults in the absence of complex polypharmacy can a priori be similar to the EHRA guideline but routine monitoring of bleeding risk is encouraged when dabigatran etexilate given with verapamil and clarithromycin.

Evaluation of the Effect of Abrocitinib on Drug Transporters by Integrated Use of Probe Drugs and Endogenous Biomarkers.

Abrocitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor currently approved in the United Kingdom for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). As patients with AD may use medications to manage comorbidities, abrocitinib could be used concomitantly with hepatic and/or renal transporter substrates. Therefore, we assessed the potential effect of abrocitinib on probe drugs and endogenous biomarker substrates for the drug transporters of interest. In vitro studies indicated that, among the transporters tested, abrocitinib has the potential to inhibit the activities of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1), and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 and 2K (MATE1/2K). Therefore, subsequent phase I, two-way crossover, open-label studies in healthy participants were performed to assess the impact of abrocitinib on the pharmacokinetics of the transporter probe substrates dabigatran etexilate (P-gp), rosuvastatin (BCRP and OAT3), and metformin (OCT2 and MATE1/2K), as well as endogenous biomarkers for MATE1/2K (N1 -methylnicotinamide (NMN)) and OCT1 (isobutyryl-L -carnitine (IBC)). Co-administration with abrocitinib was shown to increase the plasma exposure of dabigatran by ~ 50%. In comparison, the plasma exposure and renal clearance of rosuvastatin and metformin were not altered with abrocitinib co-administration. Similarly, abrocitinib did not affect the exposure of NMN or IBC. An increase in dabigatran exposure suggests that abrocitinib inhibits P-gp activity. By contrast, a lack of impact on plasma exposure and/or renal clearance of rosuvastatin, metformin, NMN, or IBC suggests that BCRP, OAT3, OCT1, and MATE1/2K activity are unaffected by abrocitinib.

Assessment of the Potential for Veverimer Drug-Drug Interactions.

Veverimer is a polymer being developed as a potential treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Veverimer selectively binds and removes hydrochloric acid from the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in an increase in serum bicarbonate. Veverimer is not systemically absorbed, so potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are limited to effects on the absorption of other oral drugs through binding to veverimer in the gastrointestinal tract or increases in gastric pH caused by veverimer binding to hydrochloric acid. In in vitro binding experiments using a panel of 16 test drugs, no positively charged, neutral, or zwitterionic drugs bound to veverimer. Three negatively charged drugs (furosemide, aspirin, ethacrynic acid) bound to veverimer; however, this binding was reduced or eliminated in the presence of normal physiologic concentrations (100-170 mM) of chloride. Veverimer increased gastric pH in vivo by 1.5-3 pH units. This pH elevation peaked within 1 hour and had returned to baseline after 1.5-3 hours. Omeprazole did not alter the effect of veverimer on gastric pH. The clinical relevance of in vitro binding and the transient increase in gastric pH was evaluated in human DDI studies using two drugs with the most binding to veverimer (furosemide, aspirin) and two additional drugs with pH-dependent solubility effecting absorption (dabigatran, warfarin). None of the four drugs showed clinically meaningful DDI with veverimer in human studies. Based on the physicochemical characteristics of veverimer and results from in vitro and human studies, veverimer is unlikely to have significant DDIs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Patients with chronic kidney disease, who are usually on many drugs, are vulnerable to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The potential for DDIs with veverimer was evaluated based on the known site of action and physicochemical structure of the polymer, which restricts the compound to the gastrointestinal tract. Based on the findings from in vitro and human studies, we conclude that veverimer is unlikely to have clinically significant DDIs.

Position paper on the safety/efficacy profile of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with chronic kidney disease. Consensus document from the SIN, FCSA and SISET.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are mostly prescribed to prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of guidelines recommend DOAC in AF patients with preserved renal function for the prevention of thromboembolism, and an increased use of DOAC in daily practice has been recorded also in elderly patients. Ageing is associated with a reduction in glomerular filtration rate, and impaired renal function, regardless of the cause, increases the risk of bleeding. Multiple medication use (polypharmacy) for treating superimposed co-morbidities is common in both elderly and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and drug-drug interaction may cause accumulation of DOAC, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. The safety profile of DOAC in patients with CKD has not been defined with any certainty, particularly in those with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease. This has been due to the heterogeneity of studies and the relative paucity of data. This document reports the position of three Italian scientific societies engaged in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation who are treated with DOAC and present with CKD.

Factors Affecting Trough Plasma Dabigatran Concentrations in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Dabigatran is effective and widely used to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) also has implications for choice of any medications, as it alters pharmacokinetic parameters of drugs. AIM: To evaluate trough plasma dabigatran concentration (DTPC) and to analyse potential factors affecting these values in patients with AF and CKD. METHODS: Patients with AF and stage 3 CKD were treated with dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg have been included in the study and allocated into D110 or D150 group. DTPC was evaluated with high-performance liquid chromatography. A plasma trough concentration/dose (C/D) ratio was used as a pharmacokinetic index. Factors affecting the DTPC were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients, aged 51-89 years, were evaluated. Compared with patients given 150 mg twice a day, those given 110 mg twice a day were older (79 vs 67.5, p < 0.0001) and had lower creatinine clearance (CrCl) (50.5 vs 60.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.015). During the median follow up of 9.5 months there were 11 bleedings in 9 patients. The C/D ratio was higher in patients aged > 75 years (p = 0.024) and was also affected by CrCl (CrCl < 50 mL/min, p = 0.02). Individuals with CKD 3B had higher concentration of dabigatran were compared with those with 3A stage (488.7 vs 332 pg/ml: mg/day, p = 0.02). However, there was also negative correlation between C/D and CrCl (r = - 0.4, p = 0.0015). Co-prescribed medications did not influence DTPC. In addition, patients with bleeding events were additionally evaluated for C/D and no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: Patients on dabigatran treatment showed highly variable trough plasma concentrations. C/D values were significantly higher in patients with CKD 3B stage and were influenced by elder age and comorbidities.

An improved extraction protocol for therapeutic dabigatran monitoring using HPLC-MS/MS.

A new sample extraction protocol was developed for pharmacokinetic studies of dabigatran with high-performance liquid chromatography separation - electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. After protein precipitation with acetonitrile, free dabigatran and its metabolites are separated into water phase by water-dichloromethane liquid-liquid extraction to purify the sample from proteins and endogenous lipophilic compounds. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Agilent Zorbax SB-CN column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)) using 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid and acetonitrile (80:20) as the mobile phase. Agilent Zorbax SB-CN column was selected to improve sample resolution and to avoided early elution of dabigatran previously seen when using a C18 column. The extended calibration curve was constructed from 5 to 1000 ng/L while precision and accuracy were assessed at four levels across the linear dynamic ranges. Within-run precision was <5.6% and the between-run precision was <3.9%. The method accuracy ranged from 89.8% to 104.4%. The developed method was successfully applied to 30 patient samples to evaluate antithrombotic efficacy and anticoagulant activity of dabigatran following knee endoprosthesis surgery.

Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Darolutamide: In Vitro and Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Darolutamide is a novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonist approved for the treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Accordingly, the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of darolutamide was investigated in both nonclinical and clinical studies. METHODS: In vitro studies were performed to determine the potential for darolutamide to be a substrate, inducer or inhibitor for cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms, other metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. A phase I drug-interaction study in healthy volunteers evaluated the impact of co-administering rifampicin [CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inducer] and itraconazole [CYP3A4, P-gp and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitor] on the pharmacokinetics of darolutamide. Two further phase I studies assessed the impact of co-administering oral darolutamide on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (sensitive CYP3A4 substrate) and dabigatran etexilate (P-gp substrate) and the impact on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered rosuvastatin [a substrate for BCRP, organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3 and organic anion transporter (OAT)3]. RESULTS: In vitro, darolutamide was predominantly metabolized via oxidative biotransformation catalyzed by CYP3A4 and was identified as a substrate for P-gp and BCRP. The enzymatic activity of nine CYP isoforms was not inhibited or slightly inhibited in vitro with darolutamide, and a rank order and mechanistic static assessment indicated that risk of clinically relevant DDIs via CYP inhibition is very low. In vitro, darolutamide exhibited no relevant induction of CYP1A2 or CYP2B6 activity. Inhibition of BCRP-, P-gp-, OAT3-, MATE1-, MATE2-K-, OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated transport was observed in vitro. Phase I data showed that darolutamide exposure increased 1.75-fold with co-administered itraconazole and decreased by 72% with rifampicin. Co-administration of darolutamide with CYP3A4/P-gp substrates showed no effect or only minor effects. Rosuvastatin exposure increased 5.2-fold with darolutamide because of BCRP and probably also OATPB1/OATPB3 inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Darolutamide has a low potential for clinically relevant DDIs with drugs that are substrates for CYP or P-gp; increased exposure of BCRP and probably OATP substrates was the main interaction of note.

Renal Excretion of Dabigatran: The Potential Role of Multidrug and Toxin Extrusion (MATE) Proteins.

Following oral administration, dabigatran etexilate (DABE) is rapidly hydrolyzed to its active form, dabigatran. DABE, but not dabigatran, presents as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate and has increasingly been used as a probe drug. Therefore, although dosed as DABE, a P-gp drug-drug interaction (DDI) is reported as a dabigatran plasma concentration ratio (perpetrator versus placebo). Because the majority of a DABE dose (80 to 85%) is recovered in urine as unchanged dabigatran (renal active secretion is ∼25% of total clearance), dabigatran was evaluated in vitro as a substrate of various human renal transporters. Active (pyrimethamine-sensitive) dabigatran uptake was observed with human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells expressing multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) and 2K (MATE2K), with Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) values of 4.0 and 8.0 µM, respectively. By comparison, no uptake of 2 µM dabigatran (versus mock-transfected HEK293 cells) was evident with HEK293 cells transfected with organic cation transporters (OCT1 and OCT2) and organic anion transporters (OAT1, 2, 3, and 4). The efflux ratios of dabigatran across P-gp- and BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein)-MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cell monolayers were 1.5 and 2.0 (versus mock-MDCK cell monolayers), suggesting dabigatran is a relatively poor P-gp and BCRP substrate. Three of five drugs (verapamil, ketoconazole, and quinidine) known to interact clinically with dabigatran, as P-gp inhibitors, presented as MATE inhibitors in vitro (IC50 = 1.0 to 25.2 µM). Taken together, although no basolateral transporter was identified for dabigatran, the results suggest that apical MATE1 and MATE2K could play an important role in its renal clearance. MATE-mediated renal secretion of dabigatran needs to be considered when interpreting the results of P-gp DDI studies following DABE administration.

The effect of routine preoperative interruption of dabigatran therapy on coagulation parameters and dabigatran plasma levels in a mixed surgical population.

Dabigatran is an oral anticoagulant used for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. While an effective antibody reversal agent is available, its cost precludes routine use and the mainstay of preoperative management is timely dabigatran interruption. Unlike warfarin, there are no universally accepted protocols for interruption of dabigatran in the preoperative period and there is uncertainty around the interpretation of standard coagulation tests in the presence of dabigatran. We performed a prospective, observational pilot study in patients presenting for elective surgery to examine: 1) the preoperative plasma dabigatran concentrations on day of surgery associated with the local dabigatran interruption protocol, 2) the potential utility of dabigatran concentrations on day of surgery, and 3) the utility of standard coagulation tests in determining whether dabigatran concentrations were below a 'safe' threshold for surgery. We recruited patients presenting to pre-admission clinics for elective surgery. Dabigatran concentrations below 30 µg/L were considered adequate for proceeding with surgery. Data were obtained and analysed from 21 patients with a median (range) age of 70 (20-86) years. Median (range) dabigatran concentrations on the day of surgery were 5 (0-59) µg/L. Two patients had day of surgery concentrations exceeding 30 µg/L. Of the standard coagulation tests examined, only the thrombin clotting time (TCT) was abnormal for these two patients. Our interruption protocol was associated with safe dabigatran concentrations in most patients on the day of surgery. A minority of patients had dabigatran concentrations above the safe threshold, which were detectable by abnormal TCT results.

Drug-Drug Interactions of P-gp Substrates Unrelated to CYP Metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidance on pharmacokinetic drugdrug interactions (DDIs) has highlighted the clinical importance of ABC transporters B1 or P-glycoprotein (P-gp), hepatic organic anion-transporting polypeptide transporters and breast cancer resistant protein because of their broad substrate specificity and the potential to be involved in DDIs. This guidance has indicated that digoxin, dabigatran etexilate and fexofenadine are P-gp substrate drugs and has defined P-gp inhibitors as those that increase the AUC of digoxin by ≧1.25-fold in clinical DDI studies. However, when substrate drugs of both CYPs and P-gp are involved in DDIs, it remains that the mechanisms of DDIs will be quite ambiguous in assessing how much the CYPs and/or drug transporters partially contribute to DDIs. OBJECTIVE: Since there are no detailed manuscripts that summarizes P-gp interactions unrelated to CYP metabolism, this article reviews the effects of potent P-gp inhibitors and P-gp inducers on the pharmacokinetics of P-gp substrate drugs, including digoxin, talinolol, dabigatran etexilate, and fexofenadine in human studies. In addition, the present outcome were to determine the PK changes caused by DDIs among P-gp substrate drugs without CYP metabolism in human DDI studies. CONCLUSION: Our manuscript concludes that the PK changes of the DDIs among P-gp drugs unrelated to CYP metabolism are less likely to be serious, and it appears to be convincing that the absences of clinical effects caused to the PK changes by the P-gp inducers is predominant compared with the excessive effects caused to those by the P-gp inhibitors.

Serum Concentrations and Elimination Rates of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in Older Hip Fracture Patients Hospitalized for Surgery: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing, but knowledge about pharmacokinetics and safety in frail patients is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine serum concentrations and elimination rates of DOACs in older hip fracture patients hospitalized for surgery. METHODS: The study included patients ≥ 65 years of age hospitalized for acute hip fracture surgery over a period of 6 months. Use of antithrombotic drugs was registered and serum samples collected for analysis of DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) at admission and surgery. Measured concentrations were assessed in relation to reference (therapeutic) ranges of the respective drugs and applied for half-life calculations. Furthermore, waiting time for surgery was compared between DOAC and warfarin users. RESULTS: Of 167 patients included (median age 84 years), 11 and 14 used DOACs and warfarin, respectively. Seven of the DOAC-treated patients had concentrations above the upper reference range (> 300 nM) at admission, and concentrations were still in the reference range for five of these at surgery. Elimination half-lives could be estimated in eight patients and ranged between 14.6 and 59.7 h (median 21.6). The observed waiting time for surgery was longer for patients using DOACs than warfarin (median 44 vs. 25 h). CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicates that older patients prone to hip fracture are at risk of being exposed to therapeutic serum concentrations of DOACs during surgery due to reduced drug elimination rates. The observation that almost 50% of the patients had therapeutic concentrations at surgery should be investigated further regarding safety of DOAC use in this frail elderly population.

Management of major bleeding and outcomes in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: results from the START-Event registry.

The management of major bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is still not well established. START-Events, a branch of the START registry (Survey on anTicoagulated pAtients RegisTer) (NCT02219984), aims to describe the actual management of bleeding or recurrent thrombotic events in routine clinical practice. We here present the results of the management of bleeding patients. The START-Event registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter, international study. Baseline characteristics (demographic, clinical, risk factors) of patients, laboratory data at admission and during follow-up, site of bleeding, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes at the time of hospital discharge and after 6 months were recorded on a web-based case report form. Between January 2015 and December 2016, 117 patients with major bleeding events were enrolled. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) was the indication for treatment in 84% (62% males); 53 patients had intracranial bleeding (13 fatal), 42 had gastrointestinal bleeding (1 fatal), and 22 had bleeding in other sites. Therapeutic interventions for the management of bleeding were performed in 71% of patients. Therapeutic strategies with/without surgery or invasive procedures included: fluid replacement or red blood cells transfusion, prothrombin complex concentrates (3 or 4 factors), antifibrinolytic drugs, and the administration of idarucizumab. Creatinine, blood cell count, and PT/aPTT were the most frequent tests requested, while specific DOAC measurements were performed in 23% of patients. Mortality during hospitalization was 11.9%, at 6-month follow-up 15.5%. Our data confirm a high heterogeneity in the management of bleeding complications in patients treated with DOACs.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Chromogenic Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay: Clinical Experiences for Dabigatran Monitoring.

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for clinical indications requiring long-term oral anticoagulation. In contrast to VKA, treatment with DOAC including dabigatran­the only direct thrombin inhibitor amongst them­does not require therapeutic drug monitoring. However, in case of treatment complications (e.g., major haemorrhage) and conditions requiring urgent surgery or thrombolytic therapy, information about actual DOAC plasma levels is needed to guide treatment decisions. Due to short reagent stability, limited accuracy at low dabigatran levels and high heparin sensitivity, the applicability of the widely used Hemoclot thrombin inhibitor (HTI) coagulation assay is limited in the emergency setting. Methods Dabigatran concentrations of 288 citrated plasma samples taken from 48 dabigatran-treated patients with drug concentrations of up to 300 ng/mL were measured with the chromogenic anti-IIa Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor (BDTI) assay and results compared with HTI using ultra performance liquid chromatography­tandem mass spectrometry as the reference method for measuring dabigatran plasma concentrations. Results BDTI results showed a very strong correlation with dabigatran concentrations (r = 0.965, p < 0.0001) as well as a low intra- and inter-assay variation of <5%. Compared with HTI, BDTI provides an improved on-board reagent stability of 72 hours, rapid turnaround times comparable to routine coagulation assays, high accuracy at low drug levels and reduced heparin sensitivity. Conclusion The BDTI is an ideal coagulation assay for the around-the-clock determination of dabigatran plasma levels in clinical routine including emergency situations.

Dabigatran - Metabolism, Pharmacologic Properties and Drug Interactions.

BACKGROUND: The superiority of dabigatran has been well proven in the standard dosing regimen in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Dabigatran, an anticoagulant with a good safety profile, reduces intracranial bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and decreases major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in acute VTE treatment. However, several important clinical issues are not fully covered by currently available directions with regard to dabigatran administration. The prominent one is reflected in the fact that dynamic impairment in renal function due to dehydratation may lead to haemorragic complications on the one hand, while on the other hand glomerular hyperfiltration may be a possible cause of dabigatran subdosing, hence reducing the drug's efficacy. Furthermore, limitations of the Cockcroft-Gault formula, considered a standard equation for assessing the renal function, may imply that other calculations are likely to obtain more accurate estimates of the kidney function in specific patient populations. Method and Conclusions: Although not routinely recommended, a possibility of monitoring dabigatran in special clinical settings adds to optimization of its dosage regimens, timely perioperative care and administration of urgently demanded thrombolytic therapy, therefore significantly improving this drug's safety profile. Despite the fact that dabigatran has fewer reported interactions with drugs, food constituents, and dietary supplements, certain interactions still remain, requiring considerable caution, notably in elderly, high bleeding risk patients, patients with decreased renal function and those on complex drug regimens. Additionally, upon approval of idarucizumab, an antidote to dabigatran solution, hitherto being a major safety concern, has been finally reached, which plays a vital role in life-threatening bleeding and emergency interventions and surgery.

Dabigatran plasma levels, aPTT and thromboelastography in patients with AF: implications for allowing early non-elective surgical procedures.

According to current recommendations, patients on dabigatran should stop the drug 24-96 h before scheduled surgery. This may seem too long for non-elective cases. The aim of our study was to assess the number of patients on dabigatran who could theoretically undergo surgery 12 h post last drug dosing. We measured dabigatran plasma trough concentration by Hemoclot assay in 75 consecutive patients receiving dabigatran. Coagulation was assessed by aPTT and thromboelastography (TEG). Plasma levels ≤30 ng/ml were considered low. TEG parameters measured were clot reaction time (R), clot growth index (k), angle (α), maximal amplitude (MA) and the percentage of clot lysed after 30 min (LY30). Twelve patients (16%) had low plasma dabigatran levels 11.6 ± 0.9 h post last dosing. These patients compared to those with higher levels had significantly different aPTT (37.7 ± 4.4 vs. 49.6 ± 9.2 s; p < 0.001) and TEG R (6.7 ± 1.3 vs. 8.4 ± 2.6 min; p = 0.002). Only three of the patients with low levels had an aPTT >40 s. Within those with levels >30 ng/ml, four patients (6.4%) had plasma dabigatran levels ≥200 ng/ml, all with aPTT >65 s and TEG R >11 min. When the analysis was restricted to patients with creatinine clearance >80 ml/min, six (27.3%) had low plasma dabigatran levels. In this theoretical study, with a low risk population, it is suggested that one-sixth of patients receiving dabigatran have low drug concentrations at 12 h. Further studies are needed to confirm that such patients with low trough levels can actually undergo safely early surgery if necessary.

Different Involvement of OAT in Renal Disposition of Oral Anticoagulants Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, and Apixaban.

This study aimed to investigate the interactions of 3 anticoagulants, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, with 5 human solute carrier transporters, hOAT1, hOAT3, hOCT2, hOATP1B1, and hOATP1B3. Apixaban inhibited hOAT3, hOATP1B1, and hOATP1B3, and rivaroxaban inhibited hOAT3 and hOATP1B3, with IC50 values of >20 and >5 µM, respectively. The effect of dabigatran was negligible or very weak, so significant drug interactions at therapeutic doses are unlikely. Specific uptake of rivaroxaban was observed only in human and mouse OAT3-expressing cells. The Km for mouse Oat3 (mOat3) was 1.01 ± 0.70 µM. A defect in mOat3 reduced the kidney-to-plasma concentration ratio of rivaroxaban by 38% in mice. Probenecid treatment also reduced the kidney-to-plasma concentration ratio of rivaroxaban in rats by 73%. Neither mOat3 defect nor probenecid administration in rats reduced the renal clearance of rivaroxaban. The uptake of rivaroxaban by monkey kidney slices was temperature dependent and inhibited by probenecid but not by tetraethylammonium. Taken together, organic anion transporters, mainly OAT3, may mediate basolateral uptake of rivaroxaban in kidneys. hOAT3 could be an additional factor that differentiates the potential drug-drug interactions of the 3 anticoagulants in the urinary excretion process in clinical settings.

[Management of NOAK administration during invasive or surgical interventions : When and how to pause and when to restart?] / Steuerung der NOAK-Gabe bei invasiven oder operativen Interventionen : Wann bzw. wie pausieren und wann wieder starten?

Many patients under oral anticoagulation therapy need percutaneous or surgical interventions/operations. For vitamin K antagonists (VKA), there are recommendations regarding preoperative or postoperative administration. Management of the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) was supposed to be easier - but some aspects must be considered. Due to the different pharmacokinetic profiles of substances such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, different recommendations are given.Upon periprocedural management, thromboembolic risk has to be considered in patients treated with NOACs. NOACS have a pharmacokinetic advantage in terms of a rapid onset and rapid elimination via the liver and kidneys. Impaired renal function results in extended half-life of NOACs considerably.Surgical procedures under NOACS can be scheduled at the beginning of next dosing interval or omitted in low/minimal bleeding risk patients, so that only 2-3 NOAC doses are not administered. In patients with moderate and high risk of bleeding, there should be a NOAC break of 24-48 h prior to surgery in order to allow a corresponding decay of the active metabolite. In patients with low/intermediate risk for thromboembolism, no bridging is necessary if the "unprotected" time (NOAC break) is less than 4-5-(7) days. In patients at high risk of thromboembolism, individual consideration must be taken regarding bridging or extended NOAC break. Whether NOACs can be dispensed or bridging is necessary in these patients must be clarified in randomized trials for periprocedural management of NOACs patients.