Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of confirmed gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin versus vancomycin on the management catheter-related bloodstream  nfections in oncology patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out including all patients admitted  at the Medical Oncology Unit between 2010 and 2018 with positive blood  cultures confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infections due to gram- positive microorganism, who were treated with either vancomycin or  daptomycin. The primary end point was all cause 30-days mortality, 30-days  hospital readmission and length of hospital stay (length of hospital stay). Results: A total of 70 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections were included in the present study: vancomycin was administered to  61.4% (n = 43) and daptomycin to 38.6% (n = 27) of  patients. 78.5% (n = 55) of isolated bacteria showed a vancomycin minimum  inhibitory concentration ≤ 1 µg/ml. No differences were observed  between the two groups of patients regarding the 30-day mortality rate rate  (32.6% [n = 14] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.797), the 30-day re-admission rate (30.2% [n = 13] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.957) or the length of  hospital stay (18.9 versus 16.5 days; p = 0.562). Nephrotoxicity rate was  equivalent in both groups: a 7% (n = 3) of vancomycin goup versus a 7.4% (n  = 2) of daptomycin group (p = 0.946). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that both antibiotics are equivalent in their  safety and effectiveness. Therefore, vancomycin should continue being the  treatment of chose for gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections,  in particular at hospital centres with a low prevalence of strains that show  diminished susceptibility to vancomycin.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de la daptomicina frente a la  vancomicina en el tratamiento de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular en pacientes oncológicos.Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a los pacientes ingresados en la Unidad de Oncología-Médica entre 2010-2018 con infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular causada por  grampositivos, y que fueron tratados con vancomicina o daptomicina. Como  objetivos principales se determinaron la tasa de mortalidad por todas las  causas a los 30 días, el reingreso hospitalario a los 30 días y la duración de la  estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: El estudio incluyó 70 pacientes con infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular: el 61,4% (n = 43) recibió  vancomicina y el 38,6% (n = 27) daptomicina. El 78,5% (n = 55) de las  bacterias aisladas presentaron una concentración mínima inhibitoria de  vancomicina ≤ 1 µg/ml. No se observaron diferencias entre ambos grupos de  pacientes en cuanto a la tasa de mortalidad a 30 días (32,6% [n = 14]  frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,797), la tasa de reingreso a 30 días (30,2% [n  = 13] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,957) o la duración de la hospitalización (18,9 frente a 16,5 días; p = 0,562). La tasa de nefrotoxicidad fue equivalente  en ambos grupos: 7% (n = 3) para vancomicina frente al 7,4% (n = 2) para  daptomicina (p = 0,946). CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados muestran que ambos antibióticos son equivalentes en su seguridad y eficacia. Por ello, vancomicina debería seguir siendo el tratamiento de elección para la infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular, especialmente en centros con  una baja prevalencia de cepas con una susceptibilidad disminuida a  ancomicina.

Safety outcomes with high-dose daptomycin in patients with acute kidney injury and/or end-stage renal disease.

WHAT IS KNOWN: Daptomycin is associated with a number of adverse effects including eosinophilic pneumonia, hypersensitivity reaction, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, headache and transaminitis. The adverse effects of high-dose daptomycin have not been fully evaluated in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and characteristics of significant adverse effects in patients receiving high-dose daptomycin with severe renal dysfunction. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study was conducted to assess safety outcomes of high-dose daptomycin in patients with an estimated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min. Adult patients aged 18 to 89 years admitted between 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Patients must have received definitive daptomycin therapy with doses greater than or equal to 7.5 mg/kg based on actual body weight. The primary outcome was overall incidence of creatine phosphokinase (CK) elevation, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 74 patients who received daptomycin therapy were screened with 50 included in the study. The population was well distributed in terms of gender (48% male, n = 24) with a median age of 61 (IQR, 48-67) years. The primary indication for daptomycin use was Gram-positive bacteremia. The median daptomycin dose was 750 (IQR, 600-875) mg, or 8.46 (IQR, 7.92-9.96) mg/kg based on actual body weight, with a median patient weight of 81 (IQR, 65-113) kg. The median duration of therapy was 27 (IQR, 14-42) days. One patient experienced significant CK elevation while on daptomycin therapy with rhabdomyolysis; however, daptomycin was continued as there was an alternative explanation for an elevated CK. One patient experienced daptomycin discontinuation due to CK elevation without meeting the definition for significant CK elevation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients with severe renal dysfunction treated with daptomycin 7.5 mg/kg or greater, significant CK elevation on daptomycin therapy was infrequently observed. Future research should confirm these findings, with special consideration for higher mg/kg dosages and/or obese populations.

Evaluation of Daptomycin-Induced Cellular Membrane Injury in Skeletal Muscle.

Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, has bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms and is especially effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Although daptomycin causes unique adverse drug reactions such as elevation of creatine phosphokinase or rhabdomyolysis, the detailed mechanisms underlying these adverse drug reactions in skeletal muscle are unclear. This study aimed to elucidate whether daptomycin causes direct skeletal muscle cell toxicity and investigate the relationship between daptomycin exposure and musculoskeletal toxicity. First, we evaluated the relationship between daptomycin exposure and skeletal muscle toxicity. Of the 38 patients who received daptomycin intravenously, an elevation in creatine phosphokinase levels was observed in five. The median plasma trough concentration of daptomycin in patients with elevated creatine phosphokinase levels was significantly higher than that in patients whose creatine phosphokinase levels were within the normal range, suggesting that increased exposure to daptomycin is related to elevation in creatine phosphokinase levels. In an in vitro study using human rhabdomyosarcoma cells, daptomycin reduced cell viability and increased membrane damage. These effects were more marked under hypoxic conditions. A necroptotic pathway seemed to be involved because phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein expression was enhanced following daptomycin exposure, which was significantly enhanced under hypoxic conditions. These findings indicate that daptomycin elicits cytotoxic effects against skeletal muscle cells via the necroptotic pathway, and the extent of toxicity is enhanced under hypoxic conditions.

Observational retrospective single-centre study in Japan to assess the clinical significance of serum daptomycin levels in creatinine phosphokinase elevation.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Daptomycin-induced creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation is reported to be associated with its trough level (Ctrough ; breakpoint of 24.3 µg/mL). However, even with high-dose treatment (ie, > 8 mg/kg), the safety of daptomycin treatment is widely demonstrated with low or no significant incidence of CPK elevation or other adverse effects, despite the possibility of Ctrough above 24.3 µg/mL. Therefore, we questioned the clinical significance of Ctrough levels of 24.3 µg/mL. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the significance of Ctrough in the clinical setting, in addition to completing a retrospective safety assessment of daptomycin utilizing electronic health records. METHODS: Patients who had received daptomycin treatment for > 4 days from July 2011 to June 2015 were enrolled. Serum daptomycin levels, including Ctrough and peak (Cpeak ), were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with a photodiode array. To evaluate the safety, patients' characteristics and relevant laboratory test values were reviewed retrospectively using an electronic medical record system. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 52 therapeutic cases for 46 patients were identified; of these, Ctrough and Cpeak levels were measured in 27 and 28 cases, respectively, and 6 patients received multiple courses of daptomycin treatment. The median age of the 52 patients was 68 years (range: 19-88 years), and 14 patients initially had an estimated creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/min. Seven cases indicated a Ctrough of above 24.3 µg/mL; however, none of these presented CPK elevation, which meets with the study definition for abnormality. Furthermore, of the two patients with abnormal CPK elevations, only one patient had a measured Ctrough (of 10.9 µg/mL). Their CPK abnormalities were temporal and did not result in treatment discontinuation. The other four patients discontinued daptomycin treatment due to suspicions of adverse effects. Of the discontinued patients, two had measured Ctrough levels; these were 8.6 and 8.1 µg/mL. All patients with abnormal CPK elevation or treatment discontinuation exhibited Ctrough levels lower than 24.3 µg/mL. In this study, two patients receiving high-dose daptomycin (ie, 9.4 and 10.0 mg/kg) had observed Ctrough levels similar to patients who received doses of daptomycin < 9 mg/kg. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: The safety of daptomycin treatment was suggested in this study. Ctrough level of 24.3 µg/mL was not suggested as a significant clinical index for the incidence of CPK elevation, adverse effects or treatment discontinuation. Thus, acceptable tolerability towards higher Ctrough levels than 24.3 µg/mL was also suggested, though further studies are required. On the other hand, low levels of daptomycin in blood were unexpectedly observed in two cases, despite the high-dose treatments. Accordingly, the monitoring of serum daptomycin levels may also be useful to assess cases in which subtherapeutic levels were achieved.

Acute kidney injury during daptomycin versus vancomycin treatment in cardiovascular critically ill patients: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive organisms are a leading cause of infection in cardiovascular surgery. Furthermore, these patients have a high risk of developing postoperative renal failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Some antibiotic drugs are known to impair renal function. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether patients treated for Gram-positive cardiovascular infection with daptomycin (DAP) experienced a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) when compared to patients treated with vancomycin (VAN), with comparable efficacy. METHODS: ICU patients who received either DAP or VAN, prior to or after cardiovascular surgery or mechanical circulatory support, from January 2010 to December 2012, were included in this observational retrospective cohort study. We excluded patients with end stage renal disease and antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI within the first week of treatment. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of AKI within the first 14 days of treatment, the severity of AKI including renal replacement therapy (RRT), the rates of clinical failure (unsuccessful infection treatment) and of premature discontinuation and mortality. To minimize selection bias, we used a propensity score to compare the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors associated with AKI. RESULTS: Seventy two patients, treated for infective endocarditis, cardiovascular foreign body infection, or surgical site infection were included (DAP, n = 28 and VAN, n = 44). AKI at day 7 was observed in 28 (64%) versus 6 (21%) of the VAN and DAP patients, respectively (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis adjusted to the propensity score, vancomycin treatment was the only factor associated with AKI (Odds Ratio 4.42; 95% CI: 1.39-15.34; p = 0.014). RRT was required for 2 (7%) DAP patients and 13 (30%) VAN patients, p = 0.035. Premature discontinuation and clinical failure occurred more frequently in VAN group than in DAP group (25% versus 4%, p = 0.022 and 42% versus 12%, respectively, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin appears to be safer than vancomycin in terms of AKI risk in ICU patients treated for cardiovascular procedure-related infection. Daptomycin could be considered as a first line treatment to prevent AKI in high-risk patients.

Daptomycin versus placebo as an adjunct to beta-lactam therapy in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To treat this infection, the current standard of care includes intravenous anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam antibiotics and obtaining adequate source control. Combination therapy with an aminoglycoside or rifampin, despite early promise, can no longer be routinely recommended due to an absence of proven benefit and risk of harm. Daptomycin is a rapidly acting bactericidal antibiotic that is approved for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia as monotherapy but has not been shown to be superior to the current standard of care. As demonstrated in vitro, the addition of daptomycin to beta-lactam therapy may result in enhanced anti-staphylococcal activity. Our objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of prescribing the combination of daptomycin with cefazolin or cloxacillin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia in adults. We hypothesize that adjunctive therapy with daptomycin will reduce the duration of bacteremia in this population. METHODS: The DASH-RCT trial is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial designed per the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendation for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. We recruit adults with confirmed MSSA bacteremia, at the McGill University Health Center. Patients are eligible if they are 18 years or older, can receive cefazolin or cloxacillin monotherapy, and are enrolled within 72 h of the first blood culture being drawn. Exclusion criteria include anaphylaxis to study drugs, having polymicrobial bacteremia, anticipated hospital admission for < 5 days, and healthcare team refusal. While receiving standard of care, study patients are randomized to a 5-day course of adjunctive daptomycin or placebo. The trial began in December 2016 and is expected to end in December 2018, after recruiting an estimated 102 patients. DISCUSSION: The DASH-RCT will compare the use of daptomycin as an adjunct to an anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam versus placebo in the treatment of MSSA bacteremia. We believe that a short course of dual therapy will result in earlier eradication of bacteremia and that subsequent research could evaluate effects on metastatic infection, relapse, and/or mortality. Ongoing issues in the trial include a delay between presentation of infection, enrollment in the trial, and the potential for unrecognized deep foci of infection at diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02972983 . Registered on 25 November 2016. Trial protocol: http://individual.utoronto.ca/leet/dash/dashprotocol.pdf.

Clinical Experience with Daptomycin for the Treatment of Gram-positive Infections in Children and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: This subgroup analysis of the European Cubicin Outcomes Registry Experience evaluated the safety and effectiveness of daptomycin in children and adolescent patients (<18 years). METHODS: Clinical outcomes at the end of therapy were assessed as success (cured or improved), failure or nonevaluable. Safety was assessed for up to 30 days post treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-one children and adolescent patients were included in this study. The most common primary infections were bacteremia (19.8%), complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (18.5%), osteomyelitis (13.6%), endocarditis (12.3%), foreign body/prosthetic infection (12.3%), uncomplicated skin and soft-tissue infection (9.9%) and other (13.6%). Daptomycin doses ranged from 4 to >10 mg/kg/day. Median duration of therapy was 12.5 (interquartile range, 7-25; mean, 16.7; standard deviation, 12.8) days. Staphylococcus aureus (46.7%) was the most commonly isolated pathogen (23.8% methicillin-resistant S. aureus). Forty-nine (60.5%) patients completed daptomycin therapy without further antibiotics, 27 (33.3%) switched to another antibiotic, 4 (4.9%) discontinued because of adverse events (AEs) and 1 (1.2%) discontinued because of other reason. Overall, 75 (92.6%; 95% confidence interval: 95.2-100.0%) patients achieved clinical success; 39 of 41 (95.1%) patients receiving daptomycin monotherapy and 36 of 40 (90.0%) patients receiving concomitant antibiotics. Six (7.4%) patients reported AEs, including 1 patient with increased blood creatine phosphokinase. Three (3.7%) patients had serious AEs; 1 (1.2%) had a serious AE possibly related to daptomycin. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin, alone or combined with other antibiotics and/or surgery, demonstrated high clinical success rates against a wide variety of infections and was well tolerated in children and adolescents.

Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for MRSA Bacteremia With Vancomycin MIC >1 mg/L: A Multicenter Evaluation.

PURPOSE: Clinical studies comparing vancomycin with alternative therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia are limited. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of early daptomycin versus vancomycin treatment for MRSA bacteremia with high vancomycin MICs in a geographically diverse multicenter evaluation. METHODS: This nationwide, retrospective, multicenter (N = 11), matched, cohort study compared outcomes of early daptomycin with vancomycin for MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI) with vancomycin MICs 1.5 to 2 µg/mL. Matching variables, based on propensity regression analysis, included age, intensive care unit (ICU), and type of BSI. Outcomes were as follows: (1) composite failure (60-day all-cause mortality, 7-day clinical or microbiologic failure, 30-day BSI relapse, or end-of-treatment failure (EOT; discontinue/change daptomycin or vancomycin because of treatment failure or adverse event]); (2) nephrotoxicity; and (2) day 4 BSI clearance. FINDINGS: A total of 170 patients were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 60 years (50-74); the median (range) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 15 (10-18); 31% were in an ICU; and 92% had an infectious disease consultation. BSI types included endocarditis/endovascular (39%), extravascular (55%), and central catheter (6%). The median daptomycin dose was 6 mg/kg, and the vancomycin trough level was 17 mg/L. Overall composite failure was 35% (59 of 170): 15% due to 60-day all-cause mortality, 14% for lack of clinical or microbiologic response by 7 days, and 17% due to failure at end of therapy (discontinue/change because of treatment failure or adverse event). Predictors of composite failure according to multivariate analysis were age >60 years (odds ratio, 3.7; P < 0.01) and ICU stay (odds ratio, 2.64; P = 0.03). Notable differences between treatment groups were seen with: (1) end of therapy failure rates (11% vs 24% for daptomycin vs vancomycin; P = 0.025); (2) acute kidney injury rates (9% vs 23% for daptomycin vs vancomycin; P = 0.043); and (3) day 4 bacteremia clearance rates for immunocompromised patients (n = 26) (94% vs 56% for daptomycin vs vancomycin; P = 0.035). IMPLICATIONS: Results from this multicenter study provide, for the first time, a geographically diverse evaluation of daptomycin versus vancomycin for patients with vancomycin-susceptible MRSA bacteremia with vancomycin MIC values >1 µg/mL. Although the overall composite failure rates did not differ between the vancomycin and daptomycin groups when intensively matched according to risks for failure, the rates of acute kidney injury were significantly lower in the daptomycin group. These findings suggest that daptomycin is a useful therapy for clinicians treating patients who have MRSA bacteremia. Prospective, randomized trials should be conducted to better assess the potential significance of elevated vancomycin MIC.

Daptomycin for Gram-positive Infections in Patients with Neutropenia: Clinical Experience from a European Outcomes Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this analysis was to describe in real-world settings the clinical outcomes and safety associated with daptomycin treatment in patients with neutropenia and Gram-positive infections. METHODS: Patients with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤1000 cells/mm(3) who received at least one dose of daptomycin between 2006 and 2012 were selected from a non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective registry (European Cubicin(®) Outcome Registry and Experience; EU-CORE(SM)). RESULTS: Of the 6075 patients enrolled in EU-CORE, 446 (7.3%) had an ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm(3) at baseline or during daptomycin therapy; they were all included in efficacy and safety populations. Half of the patients had severe neutropenia (ANC ≤ 100 cells/mm(3)). Most patients had hematologic malignancy (60.5%), an immunosuppressed state (39.7%) or had undergone a transplant (27.8%). The most common primary infections were bacteremia (42.2%) and complicated skin and soft tissue infection (13.9%). Cultures were positive for 68.6% (254/370) of patients with available culture results; coagulase-negative staphylococci (43.7%; 111/254) and Staphylococcus aureus (18.9%; 48/254) were the most commonly isolated primary pathogens. Median duration of daptomycin therapy was 10.0 (range 1-98) days. Most patients (82.8%) received antibiotics concomitantly with daptomycin; the most common were carbapenems (51.2%), penicillins (42.1%), and aminoglycosides (19.9%). The overall clinical success rate (cured or improved) associated with daptomycin was 77.1%. Adverse events possibly related to daptomycin treatment were reported in seven (1.6%) patients and led to drug discontinuation in 27 (6.1%) patients. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that daptomycin is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of a broad range of Gram-positive infections in patients with neutropenia, and has a good safety profile. FUNDING: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.

Dyspnea on daptomycin: eosinophilic pneumonia.

We present a case of drug-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia with characteristic imaging and bronchioloaveolar lavage (BAL) findings. Although not a common diagnosis, it is important to consider in the right clinical scenario, including a patient with presumed pneumonia that does not respond to typical treatment. Diagnosis is confirmed by bronchoscopy with BAL. For drug-induced types, treatment includes removal of the offending agent. Corticosteroids are used if symptoms are severe and can result in rapid clinical improvement.

Daptomycin use in neutropenic patients with documented gram-positive infections.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to describe the outcomes associated with daptomycin treatment of documented gram-positive infections in patients with neutropenia. METHODS: All patients with neutropenia (≤500 cells/m(3)) and at least one documented gram-positive culture from 2006-2009 were identified from a retrospective, multicenter, and observational registry (Cubicin(®) Outcome Registry and Experience (CORE(®))). Investigators assessed patient outcome (cured, improved, failed, nonevaluable) at the end of daptomycin therapy. All patients were included in the safety analysis. RESULTS: The efficacy population had 186 patients; 159 (85 %) patients had either cure (n = 108, 58 %) or improved (n = 51, 27 %) as an outcome. Success rates (cure plus improved) by the lowest WBC during daptomycin were 98/116 (84 %) for ≤100 cells/m(3) and 61/70 (87 %) for 101-499 cells/m(3), P = 0.6. Most patients had cancer; 135/186 (73 %) had hematological malignancy; 26/186 (14 %) had solid tumors, and 9 (5 %) had both. One hundred fifty-six (84 %) patients received other antibiotics before daptomycin treatment; 82 % vancomycin, of which 31 % failed vancomycin. The most common infections were bacteremia (78 %), skin and skin structure infections (8 %), and urinary tract infections/pyelonephritis (6 %). The most common pathogens were vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (47 %), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (20 %), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (19 %). The median (min, max) initial daptomycin dose was 6 mg/kg (3.6, 8.3). The median (min, max) daptomycin duration of therapy was 14 days (1, 86). Possibly related adverse events occurred in 12/209 patients (6 %), and 13 patients (6 %) discontinued daptomycin due to adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that daptomycin appeared useful and well tolerated in neutropenic patients, and the degree of neutropenia did not affect daptomycin success rates. Comparative clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Brazilian experience in EU-CORE: daptomycin registry and treatment of serious Gram-positive infections

OBJECTIVES: To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection. RESULTS: Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. - coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6 mg/kg (30.6%) and 4 mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.

Safety and efficacy of high-dose daptomycin as salvage therapy for severe gram-positive bacterial sepsis in hospitalized adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the dosage of daptomycin may be advantageous in severe infection by enhancing bactericidal activity and pharmacodynamics. However, clinical data on using daptomycin at doses above 6 mg/kg in Asian population are limited. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of all hospitalized adult patients treated with daptomycin (> 6 mg/kg) for at least 72 hours was performed in Taiwan. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients (40 males) with a median age of 57 years received a median dose of 7.61 mg/kg (range, 6.03-11.53 mg/kg) of daptomycin for a median duration of 14 days (range, 3-53 days). Forty-one patients (61.2%) were in intensive care units (ICU). Sites of infections included complicated skin and soft tissue infections (n = 16), catheter-related bacteremia (n = 16), endocarditis (n = 11), primary bacteremia (n = 10), osteomyelitis and septic arthritis (n = 9), and miscellaneous (n = 5). The median Pitt bacteremia score among the 54 (80.6%) patients with bacteremia was 4. The most common pathogen was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 38). Fifty-nine patients (88.1%) were treated with daptomycin after glycopepetide use. Overall, 52 (77.6%) patients achieved clinical success. The all-cause mortality rate at 28 day was 35.8%. In multivariate analysis, the significant predictors of in-hospital mortality in 54 bacteremic patients were malignancies (P = 0.01) and ICU stay (P = 0.02). Adverse effects of daptomycin were generally well-tolerated, leading to discontinuation in 3 patients. Daptomycin-related creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations were observed in 4 patients, and all received doses > 8 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with high dose daptomycin as salvage therapy was generally effective and safe in Taiwan. CPK level elevations were more frequent in patients with dose > 8 mg/kg.

Successful clinical use of daptomycin-impregnated bone cement in two-stage revision hip surgery for prosthetic joint infection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safe and successful use of daptomycin-impregnated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement in the treatment of a case of recurrent prosthetic joint infection in a patient with multiple antibiotic allergies and past colonization with multiply antibiotic-resistant organisms. CASE SUMMARY: A 79-year-old female had a history of chronic recurrent left prosthetic hip infection. The patient had confirmed allergies to multiple antibiotics and a past history of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. At first-stage revision surgery, the infected prosthesis was removed and samples were sent for microbiologic culture. A spacer device was fashioned, with incorporation of daptomycin and gentamicin into the PMMA bone cement at a concentration of 5% w/w for each antibiotic. Systemic daptomycin and gentamicin were administered postoperatively for 14 days. Propionibacterium acnes was isolated from deep-tissue specimens. The patient made excellent postoperative progress and was discharged after 2 weeks. Second-stage revision surgery was performed at 6 months, with no signs of persistent infection. She remained well, pain free, and mobilizing independently 2 years later. DISCUSSION: Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, is approved for systemic treatment of endocarditis and skin and soft tissue infections. In vitro data demonstrate acceptable drug elution from and tensile strength of daptomycin-impregnated PMMA bone cement; however, clinical data are lacking. In our patient's case, the cement formulation was well tolerated, with no adverse effects detected, and demonstrated adequate mechanical strength in vivo. Infection with P. acnes, an unusual pathogen, was successfully treated. Further clinical studies are required to assess the efficacy of daptomycin-impregnated cement in infection with more typical pathogens, such as S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin impregnation of PMMA bone cement may be an option in cases in which patient or pathogen factors preclude use of routinely incorporated agents.

[Daptomycin for the treatment of gram-positive infections after cardiac surgery]. / Daptomycin zur Behandlung grampositiver Infektionen nach herzchirurgischen Eingriffen.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: Surgical infection remains a main cause of death after heart surgery, despite advances in pharmacological therapy. Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, useful in gram-positive organisms resistant to standard treatment, including vancomycin. The aim of this study was to describe the use of daptomycin regarding efficacy, efficiency and safety in patients with gram-positive infections after heart surgery using a retrospective analysis on 49 adult patients. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin shows excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against gram-positive organisms, such as Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, especially MRSA. Daptomycin is also effective against increasing vancomycin-resistant or vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus.

Management of gram-positive bacterial infections in patients with cancer.

Bacterial infections, particularly those due to gram-positive bacteria, continue to predominate in patients with cancer. Coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive staphylococci and enterococci remain as common pathogenic microorganisms. Clostridium difficile has emerged as a significant pathogen. Major clinical syndromes include vascular catheter-related infection, febrile neutropenia, diarrhea and colitis. Rising antimicrobial resistance among gram-positive bacteria is of serious concern. The clinical utility of penicillin against streptococci and vancomycin against coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive staphylococci and enterococci may be rapidly diminishing. Liberal empiric use of vancomycin during neutropenic fever needs careful reconsideration. Newer promising anti-gram-positive bacterial drugs with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci include daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and telavancin. However, toxicity concerns, limited data in immunocompromised populations and high cost prevent the widespread use of these drugs among patients with cancer.

Prospective, non-comparative study of daptomycin for the treatment of superficial and deep incisional surgical site infections.

BACKGROUND: Skin infections, including surgical site infections (SSIs), usually involve gram-positive pathogens and continue to be a leading cause of morbidity and death among hospital patients. The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other resistant strains accentuates the need for effective and safe therapies for such infections. This exploratory study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daptomycin in patients with gram-positive SSI according to wound classification. METHODS: Eligible patients had an SSI with onset < 30 days after surgery, positive gram stain or culture at least three days before daptomycin therapy began, and three or more clinical signs and symptoms of infection. The incisional SSI was classified as superficial or deep according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Patients with organ-space infections were excluded, as were those with major concomitant infections, foreign material in the incision that could not be removed, previous systemic antimicrobial therapy, or creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min. Daptomycin 4 mg/kg was administered intravenously once daily for 7-14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at the end of daptomycin therapy, and the safety assessment was based on adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled, 60 of whom were evaluable for efficacy. Extremity wounds predominated among superficial incisional SSIs (n = 30), whereas abdominal wounds predominated among deep SSIs (n = 30). Patients with deep incisional SSI were more likely to be young, male, white, and febrile and to weigh more than patients with superficial SSIs. The overall clinical success rate was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-97%); the success rate was 100% in superficial incisional SSI and 83% in deep SSI (17% difference; 95% CI 0-33%). Staphylococcus aureus (28/36 methicillin-resistant) was the pathogen isolated most frequently. In 10 patients who were febrile at baseline, the median time to defervescence was five days, and the mean duration of treatment in the series was 11.2 days. Daptomycin was well tolerated. In most patients, AEs were mild or moderate in intensity; in two patients (one superficial, one deep), daptomycin was discontinued because of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this exploratory study of SSI are consistent with those of previous studies of daptomycin in the treatment of diverse complicated skin and skin-structure infections, and suggest that wound classification should be treated as an important covariate in future studies of daptomycin and other antibiotics.

Daptomycin use in patients with cancer and neutropenia: data from a retrospective registry.

Clinical data for daptomycin in the treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with documented gram-positive infections are limited. For this study, neutropenic patients were identified from an ongoing retrospective registry (Cubicin Outcome Registry and Experience [CORE]; 2006 program year). Clinical outcomes included cure, improved, failed, and nonevaluable response, and were assessed at the end of daptomycin therapy. Patients who had a nonevaluable clinical response were only included in the safety analysis. Eighty-four patients were identified, of which 72 (86%) were clinically evaluable. Thirty-four (47%) evaluable patients had severe neutropenia (less than 100 cells/mm(3)). Hematologic malignancies were most common (82%). Bacteremia was the most common infection (76%), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (50%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%), and Staphylococcus aureus (11%) were the most common pathogens isolated. Sixty-three patients (88%) received prior antibiotics, including vancomycin (83%), cefepime (17%), and linezolid (16%). The overall success rate (cure + improved) was 90%. Success rates stratified by degree of neutropenia were 85% for patients with less than 100 cells/mm(3), 93% for those with 100-499 cells/mm(3), and 100% for those with 500-1,000 cells/mm(3). The median final daptomycin dose was 6 mg/kg (range, 3-8) and the median duration of therapy was 13 days (range, 1-86). Of the 84 patients analyzed for safety, 24 (29%) developed 44 adverse events; only 5 (6%) patients had adverse events possibly related to daptomycin. The results suggest that daptomycin may be useful for specific cases involving neutropenic patients, and comparative clinical trials are feasible.