Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; Publish Ahead of Print: 541-548, 2020 12 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used because of its perceived advantages in reducing surgical site infections, wound complications, and the need for further surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the infection rates, wound complications, length of stay, and financial burden associated with NPWT use in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We performed a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) systematic review of the existing literature on using NPWT in primary and revision TKA. PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library were utilized. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. RESULTS: Twelve articles that evaluated 1,403 primary TKAs and 279 revision TKAs were reviewed. NPWT significantly reduced complication rates in revision TKA. However, there was no significant difference in infection rates between NPWT and regular dressings in primary or revision TKA. NPWT use in primary TKA significantly increased the risk of blistering, although no increase in reoperations was noted. The analysis showed a possible reduction in length of stay associated with NPWT use for both primary and revision TKA, with overall health-care cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis of the existing literature, we do not recommend the routine use of NPWT. However, in high-risk revision TKA and selected primary TKA cases, NPWT reduced wound complications and may have health-care cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Bandagens/economia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/economia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
2.
Neurosurg Rev ; 43(1): 131-140, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30120610

RESUMO

The early identification and optimized treatment of wound dehiscence are a complex issue, with implications on the patient's clinical and psychological postoperative recovery and on healthcare system costs. The most widely accepted treatment is surgical debridement (also called "wash out"), performed in theater under general anesthesia (GA), followed by either wide-spectrum or targeted antibiotic therapy. Although usually effective, in some cases, such a strategy may be insufficient (generally ill, aged, or immunocompromised patients; poor tissue conditions). Moreover, open revision may still fail, requiring further surgery and, therefore, increasing patients' discomfort. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness, costs, and patients' satisfaction of conventional surgical revision with those of bedside wound dehiscence repair. In 8 years' time, we performed wound debridement in 130 patients. Two groups of patients were identified. Group A (66 subjects) underwent conventional revision under GA in theater; group B (64 cases) was treated under local anesthesia in a protected environment on the ward given their absolute refusal to receive further surgery under GA. Several variables-including length and costs of hospital stay, antibiotic treatment modalities, and success and resurgery rates-were compared. Permanent wound healing was observed within 2 weeks in 59 and 55 patients in groups A and B, respectively. Significantly reduced costs, shorter antibiotic courses, and similar success rates and satisfaction levels were observed in group B compared with group A. In our experience, the bedside treatment of wound dehiscence proved to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestesia Local , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Desbridamento , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Reoperação , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização , Adulto Jovem
3.
BJU Int ; 121(3): 428-436, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063725

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the financial impact of complications after radical cystectomy (RC) and their associations with respective 90-day costs, as RC is a morbid surgery plagued by complications and the expenditure attributed to specific complications after RC is not well characterised. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Premier Hospital Database (Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA) to identify 9 137 RC patients (weighted population of 57 553) from 360 hospitals between 2003 and 2013. Complications were categorised according to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classifications. Patients with and without complications were compared, and multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: An index complication increased costs by $9 262 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8 300-10 223) and a readmission complication increased costs by $20 697 (95% CI 18 735-22 660). The four most costly index complications (descending order) were venous thromboembolism (VTE), infection, wound and soft tissue complications, and pulmonary complications (P < 0.001, vs no complication). A complication increased length of stay by 4 days (95% CI 3.6-4.3). One in five patients were readmitted in 90 days and the four costliest readmission complications (descending order) were pulmonary, bleeding, VTE, and gastrointestinal complications (P < 0.001, vs no complication). Readmitted patients had multiple complications upon readmission (median of 3, interquartile range 2-4). On multivariable analysis, more comorbidities, longer surgery (>6 h), transfusions of >3 units, and teaching hospitals were associated with higher costs (P < 0.05), whilst high-volume surgeons and shorter surgeries (<4 h) were associated with lower costs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Complications after RC increase index and readmission costs for hospitals, and can be categorised based on magnitude. Future initiatives in RC may also consider costs of complications when establishing quality improvement priorities for patients, providers, or policymakers.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Transfusão de Sangue , Comorbidade , Cistectomia/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/economia , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infecções/economia , Infecções/etiologia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Pneumopatias/economia , Pneumopatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia
4.
J Wound Care ; 26(Sup2): S23-S26, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182535

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the prevention of postoperative surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is the subject of much debate and remains to be determined. This study will identify individuals at risk of postoperative SWD and trial the use of NPWT as a prophylactic measure against the occurrence of SWD, compared with a non-NPWT standard surgical dressing (SSD). METHOD: A prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing NPWT dressing against standard surgical dressings (SSD) will be conducted. An intention-to-treat (ITT) approach will be used for the trial. AIMS: The primary outcome is the prevention of postoperative SWD up to and including day 30 postoperative. Secondary outcomes are: prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) and economic analysis of treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study will determine the effectiveness of NPWT in the prevention of postoperative abdominal SWD in a predefined level of risk population. This level 1 study will provide further data for abdominal SWD risk classification, which is anticipated to inform preventive postoperative management. The study design uses a prospective real-world scenario in order to identify clinically significant differences between the intervention and control groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on 10 December 2012 with Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Network (ANZCTR): 12612001275853.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Abdome/cirurgia , Bandagens , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Laparotomia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia
5.
J Surg Res ; 206(1): 214-222, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27916364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with complex ventral hernias may benefit from preoperative optimization. This study evaluates the financial impact of preventable comorbidities (PCM) in elective open ventral hernia repair. METHODS: In this single institution prospectively collected data from 2007-2011, hospital charges (included all hernia-related visits, interventions, or readmissions) and wound-related complications in patients with PCM-diabetes, tobacco use, and obesity-were compared to patients without such risks using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Within the study period, there were 118 patients with no PCM; of those, 33 had complications, and 85 did not. In the 131 patients with two or more PCM, 81 had complications; 89 of 251 patients had complications in the group with only 1 PCM; groups with PCM were significantly more likely to have complications compared to the no PCM group (62% versus 35.4% versus 28%, P < 0.05). The majority of the patient population was female (57.2%) with a mean age of 57.8 y (range, 22-84 ys), and median defect size was 150 cm2 (interquartile range, 50-283 cm2). Body mass index was higher in PCM group with complications than in PCM without complications (40 versus 36 kg/m2, P < 0.05). For patients with complications, the average hospital charges were $80,660 in the PCM group compared to $55,444 in the no PCM group (P = 0.038). Hospital charges in those with PCM without complications compared to no PCM with complications were equivalent ($65,453 versus $55,444, P = 0.55). Even when no complications occurred, patients with PCM incurred higher charges than No PCM for inpatient ($61,269 versus $31,236, P < 0.02), outpatient ($4,185 versus $552, P < 0.04), and total hospital charges ($65,453 versus $31,788, P ≤ 0.001). Those patients without complications but with a single PCM incurred larger charges than those with no PCM during follow-up ($3578 versus $552, P = 0.04), but there was no difference in hospital or overall total charges (P > 0.05). Interestingly, patients without complications, both hospital ($38,333 versus $61,269, P = 0.02) and total charges ($41,911 versus $65,453, P = 0.01) were increased for patients with 2+ PCM compared to those with only a single PCM. If complications occurred, no difference between the single PCM group compared to the two or more PCM groups existed for hospital, follow-up, or overall charges (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PCM undergoing open ventral hernia repair are more likely to have complications than patients without comorbidities. Patients with PCM generate higher hospital charges than those without PCM even when no complications occur; furthermore, the more PCM, the patient has the more significant the impact. Interestingly, patients with multiple PCM and no complications had equivalent hospital costs compared to patients with no PCM and with complications. Aggressive risk reduction may translate into significant savings. Preoperative preparation of patients before elective surgery is indicated.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Hérnia Ventral/epidemiologia , Herniorrafia/economia , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hérnia Ventral/economia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Obesidade/economia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/epidemiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/terapia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Uso de Tabaco/economia , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Breast ; 30: 118-124, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27697676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to compare, by patient obesity status, the contemporary utilization patterns of different reconstruction surgery types, understand postoperative complication profiles in the community setting, and analyze the financial impact on health care payers and patients. METHODS: Using data from the MarketScan Health Risk Assessment Database and Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, we identified breast cancer patients who received breast reconstruction surgery following mastectomy between 2009 and 2012. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate the utilization pattern of breast reconstruction surgery. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate the association between obesity status and infectious, wound, and perfusion complications within one year of surgery. A generalized linear model was used to compare total, complication-related, and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: The rate of TE/implant-based reconstruction increased significantly for non-obese patients but not for obese patients during the years analyzed, whereas autologous reconstruction decreased for both patient groups. Obesity was associated with higher odds of infectious, wound, and perfusion complications after TE/implant-based reconstruction, and higher odds of perfusion complications after autologous reconstruction. The adjusted total healthcare costs and out-of-pocket costs were similar for obese and non-obese patients for either type of breast reconstruction surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A greater likelihood of one-year complications arose from TE/implant-based vs autologous reconstruction surgery in obese patients. Given that out-of-pocket costs were independent of the type of reconstruction, greater emphasis should be placed on conveying the surgery-related complications to obese patients to aid in patient-based decision making with their plastic surgeons and oncologists.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Mastectomia/métodos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Implante Mamário/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Tomada de Decisões , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Necrose Gordurosa/economia , Necrose Gordurosa/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Mamoplastia/economia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Seroma/economia , Seroma/epidemiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/economia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Expansão de Tecido/economia , Expansão de Tecido/métodos
7.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 17(4): 427-35, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26891115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) occur in 1.8%-9.2% of women undergoing cesarean section (CS) and lead to greater morbidity rates and increased treatment costs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) impregnated dressings to prevent SSI in women subject to CS. METHODS: Randomized, controlled trial was conducted at the Mazovian Bródno Hospital, a tertiary care center performing approximately 1300 deliveries per year, between June 2014 and April 2015. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either DACC impregnated dressing or standard surgical dressing (SSD) following skin closure. In order to analyze cost-effectiveness of the selected dressings in the group of patients who developed SSI, the costs of ambulatory visits, additional hospitalization, nursing care, and systemic antibiotic therapy were assessed. Independent risk factors for SSI were determined by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-three women undergoing elective or emergency CS were enrolled. The SSI rates in the DACC and SSD groups were 1.8% and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.04). The total cost of SSI prophylaxis and treatment was greater in the control group as compared with the study group (5775 EUR vs. 1065 EUR, respectively). Independent risk factors for SSI included higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.08; [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-1.2]; p < 0.05), smoking in pregnancy (aOR = 5.34; [95% CI: 1.6-15.4]; p < 0.01), and SSD application (aOR = 2.94; [95% CI: 1.1-9.3]; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of DACC impregnated dressings in SSI prevention among women undergoing CS.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Curativos Oclusivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Anti-Infecciosos/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Carbamatos/administração & dosagem , Carbamatos/economia , Cesárea/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gravidez , Método Simples-Cego , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 16(2): 134-8, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25545657

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficiency of two different sternal closure techniques in preventing sternal wound instability in high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and February 2012, 2068 consecutive cardiac patients were prospectively collected in our database. The 561 patients in whom the thermoreactive nitilium clips (Flexigrip) have been used (group A) were matched 1 : 1 with 561 patients who received a standard parasternal wiring technique (group B) on 10 available risk factors known to affect sternal wound healing (age, age >75 years, sex, diabetes mellitus, cardiac procedure, obesity, re-intervention, cross-clamp, and total operative times). The study was completed with a cost analysis. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched, although different for bilateral internal thoracic harvesting, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, and congestive heart failure, which were significantly more frequent in group A. At 30 days of follow-up, the association of wound complication and sternal instability was significantly less frequent in group A versus group B (0.2 versus 1.6%) (P = 0.04). Overall incidence of sternal wound complication was lower in group A (2 versus 3.5%) (P = 0.28). In the presence of wound infection, a sternal wound instability was never observed in group A (P = 0.06). Overall costs were €8,701,854 and €9,243,702 in groups A and B, respectively; thus the Flexigrip closure technique offered a €541,848 cost saving. CONCLUSIONS: Flexigrip use in high-risk patients showed a lower incidence of sternal wound instability with no need for sternal re-wiring in any case, even in the presence of wound infection.


Assuntos
Ligas , Fios Ortopédicos , Esterno/cirurgia , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/instrumentação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/economia
9.
Hernia ; 18(6): 775-80, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23839330

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Suturing with small stitches instead of with large reduces the risk for surgical site infection and incisional hernia in continuously closed midline abdominal incisions. The purpose was to analyse if using small stitches generated cost savings. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2006 closure of midline incisions using small stitches was, in a randomised trial, compared with the use of large stitches. In 2011 all patients included in the randomised trial, who until then, had had an incisional hernia repair, were recorded. The cost for an open incisional hernia repair with mesh reinforcement during 2010 was calculated. The analysis included both direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: Of 321 patients closed with small stitches incisional hernia occurred in 11 and 3 needed repair. Of 370 patients closed with large stitches herniation occurred in 45 and 14 needed repair. The direct cost per hernia repair was 59,909 Swedish krona (SEK) and the indirect cost was 26,348 SEK. Suturing time with small stitches was 4.6 min longer, increasing the cost for the index operation by 1,076 SEK. From the societal perspective (direct and indirect costs), using small stitches generated a cost reduction of 1,339 SEK for each patient. From the perspective of the public payer (direct costs) the cost reduction was 601 SEK. Using small stitches generated cost savings from a societal perspective if the suturing time was not prolonged over 10.3 min. CONCLUSIONS: Using small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions with a continuous single-layer technique generates cost savings.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais , Redução de Custos/métodos , Hérnia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Técnicas de Sutura , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/economia , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hérnia Ventral/economia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/economia , Herniorrafia/instrumentação , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/economia , Cicatrização
10.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 17(8): 1477-84, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23715648

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Long-term quality of life and body image of patients with abdominal wound dehiscence were assessed. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with abdominal wound dehiscence from a prospectively followed cohort of 967 patients (2007-2009) were reviewed. Patients completed the Short Form 36 quality of life questionnaire and Body Image Questionnaire and participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. For each patient, four controls were matched by age and gender. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, and follow-up length. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients with abdominal wound dehiscence, 23 were alive after a mean follow-up of 40 months (range 33-49 months). Nineteen patients developed incisional hernias (83 %). Patients with abdominal wound dehiscence reported significantly lower scores for physical and mental component summaries (p = 0.038, p = 0.013), general health (p = 0.003), mental health (p = 0.011), social functioning (p = 0.002), and change (p = 0.034). No differences were found for physical functioning (p = 0.072), role physical (p = 0.361), bodily pain (p = 0.133), vitality (p = 0.150), and role emotional (p = 0.138). Patients with abdominal wound dehiscence reported lower body image scores (median 16.5 vs. 18, p = 0.087), cosmetic scores (median 13 vs. 16, p = 0.047), and total body image scores (median 30 vs. 34, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up, patients with abdominal wound dehiscence demonstrated a high incidence of incisional hernia, low body image, and low quality of life.


Assuntos
Imagem Corporal/psicologia , Hérnia Abdominal/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/complicações , Abdome/cirurgia , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Seguimentos , Nível de Saúde , Hérnia Abdominal/cirurgia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Participação Social , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 94(6): 1848-53, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23103007

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess the efficiency of two different sternal closure techniques in preventing sternal wound complications (SWC). A cost analysis was also considered. METHODS: Between January 2008 and April 2010, 1,644 consecutive cardiac surgery patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our institute were prospectively collected. A total of 1,072 patients received a standard parasternal wiring technique (group A), and 572 patients received a new method of sternal closure based on the use of thermoreactive nitillium clips (Flexigrip; Praesidia SRL, Bologna, Italy [group B]). We investigated, by a propensity matched analysis, whether the use of standard or nitinol clip closure would impact on sternal wound outcome. RESULTS: In all, 464 patients of each group were matched for 17 available risk factors. Overall incidence of SWC was significantly higher in group A (4.1% versus 1.7%; p=0.03). Sternal surgical revision to treat a thoracic instability was required in a significantly higher number of patients in group A (9 patients, 1.9%) and in none of group B (p=0.004). The incidence of sternal instability, secondary to wound infection, was significantly lower in group B (p=0.05). Overall costs were €7,407,296 and €6,896,432 in group A and group B, respectively. Thus, nitinol clip closure technique offered a €510,864 cost saving compared with standard steel wiring technique. CONCLUSIONS: The Flexigrip assured a lower incidence of SWC. The use of the nitinol clip favored an improved sternal closure technique preventing mediastinitis. Additionally, the nitinol clip system proved to be cost effective in cardiac surgery.


Assuntos
Ligas , Fios Ortopédicos , Reoperação/economia , Esterno/cirurgia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Toracotomia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia
12.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 17(10): 2764-72, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20336388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We prospectively assessed the incidence, risk factors, and costs associated with wound complications and lymphedema in melanoma patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 53 melanoma patients were accrued to 2 trials (June 2005 to July 2008) that included prospective evaluations of postoperative complications; 30-day wound complications included infection, seroma, and/or dehiscence. There were 20 patients who underwent limb volume measurement and completed a 19-item lymphedema symptom assessment questionnaire preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate potential risk factors for complications. A microcosting analysis was also performed to evaluate the direct costs associated with wound complications. RESULTS: The 30-day wound complications were noted in 77.4% of patients. A BMI ≥ 30 (n = 28) increased the risk for wound complications (odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.6-78.5, P = .01), while advanced nodal disease approached significance (OR = 9.0, 95%CI: 0.79-103.1, P = .08). Other risk factors, including diabetes, smoking, and the addition of a deep pelvic (iliac/obturator) dissection to ILND, were not significant. Of 20 patients, 9 (45%) developed limb volume change (LVC) ≥5% at 3 months, with associated mean symptom scores of 6.1 versus 4.6 for those without LVC. Costs for patients with wound complications were significantly higher than for those without wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative wound complications and early onset lymphedema occur frequently following ILND for melanoma. Obesity is an adverse risk factor for 30-day wound complications that can significantly increase postoperative costs, as is likely the case for advanced disease. Risk reduction practices and novel treatment approaches are needed to reduce postoperative morbidity.


Assuntos
Canal Inguinal/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/economia , Linfedema/economia , Melanoma/economia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Canal Inguinal/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/cirurgia , Masculino , Melanoma/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
13.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 77(2): 672-5, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14759457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Superficial wound dehiscence after midline sternotomy is considered a minor complication in cardiac surgery, although it is quite frequent and requires prolonged medical treatment. It can be managed conventionally by topical treatment, with delayed secondary healing, or by surgical treatment and primary skin closure. We report the outcome of 96 patients who underwent conventional treatment, compared with a second group of 42 patients who underwent surgical treatment and direct closure. METHODS: From October 1999 to December 2002, 2400 consecutive patients underwent median sternotomy: 207 patients had sternal wound complications: 3 patients (0.125%) had mediastinitis, 66 patients (2.75%) had aseptic deep sternal wound dehiscence, and 138 patients (5.75%) had superficial wound dehiscence. The latter are the object of the present study; patients entered a protocol of skin wound care on an outpatient basis. The first 96 consecutive patients (group 1) required medications three times a week until complete healing. The last 42 patients (group 2) were treated by extensive surgical debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue, direct closure of the superficial layers, and suture removal after 15 days. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable as to age, sex, and preoperative risk factors. The incidence of contaminated wounds was similar in the two groups (32 of 96 in group 1 and 11 of 42 in group 2; p = NS). The length of treatment was 29.7 days (range 2 to 144 days) for group 1 and 12.2 days (range 2 to 37 days) for group 2 (p < 0.0001). The mean number of medical treatments was 9.4 per patient in group 1 and 3.7 per patient in group 2 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical debridement and primary closure of superficial surgical wound dehiscence after median sternotomy is a safe and valid treatment. Wound infection is not a contraindication to surgical treatment. Primary closure may contribute to reduce the risk for later infection. It also definitely contributes to decreasing healing time and strongly lessens patients' discomfort, diminishing hospital costs and hospital staff workload.


Assuntos
Esterno/cirurgia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/cirurgia , Toracotomia , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Bandagens , Cloraminas/administração & dosagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desbridamento/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura/economia , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos
14.
Chirurg ; 73(2): 167-73, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11974481

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Besides quality, costs play an increasingly important role. For rectal carcinoma, the cost of the surgical treatment of the disease (including after-care) was analysed under variable clinical conditions. METHODS: Eleven patients (eight men, three women, median age 57 years) with curative resection of rectal carcinoma between 1991 and 1995 were selected: Five patients with an uneventful course remaining recurrence-free, three patients who developed an anastomotic leakage and three patients with locoregional recurrence during their further course. In three patients, adjuvant radiochemotherapy was performed after resection of the primary tumor. For each patient, costs from the first postoperative day until the end of an assumed after-care of 5 years' duration were analysed. RESULTS: Costs for the postoperative period of the primary treatment ranged between 3.162 DM and 149.988 DM, in case of development of an anastomotic leakage between 14.699 DM and 149.988 DM. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy increased costs by 12.265 DM up to 23.259 DM, locoregional recurrence caused additional costs between 9.461 DM and 27.301 DM. Cost group analysis showed the costs for nursing care to be the highest (30% of total costs), followed by the expense for drugs and medication. Total costs of treatment ranged from 7.361 DM to 160.833 DM. CONCLUSIONS: Costs as well as the patient's prognosis depend to a great extent on the quality of the procedure and consequently on the individual operating surgeon. A complicated course is associated with a considerable increase in costs. A complete cost analysis of rectal carcinoma has to include the cost of a potential locoregional recurrence which would lead to the additional prolonged after-care for these patients.


Assuntos
Honorários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Geral/economia , Neoplasias Retais/economia , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/economia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/cirurgia
15.
Chirurg ; 69(7): 725-34, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9738217

RESUMO

Hospitals are facing increasing economic pressure. It therefore seems necessary to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of medical or surgical interventions. In this study 324 anastomoses (167 stapled and 157 hand-sewn) were performed after randomization during 200 elective operations [20.5% gastrectomies, 14% gastric resections (Billroth II), 15% Whipple's procedures, 4% segmental colonic resections, 18% right-sided hemicolectomies, 4% left-sided hemicolectomies, 22% sigmoid- or anterior rectal resections, 2.5% total colectomies with pouch-anal anastomoses] in 200 patients. Postoperative motility (time to full oral diet, time with naso-gastric tube) and hospitalization were comparable in both groups. Anastomotic insufficiency was observed in 2.1% of all patients, five after stapled and two after hand-sewn anastomoses. Hospital mortality was 1.5%. All stapled anastomoses were performed significantly (P < 0.001) faster. However, the cost of material for these anastomoses was significantly (P < 0.001) higher, resulting in significantly higher total costs for reconstruction. The time saving for the reconstruction did not influence the total operative time (except for stapled gastrectomy). Therefore, all operations with stapled reconstruction were more expensive than those with sutured reconstruction. The difference was significant for the gastrectomy (P < 0.01), colonic resection (P < 0.01) and sigmoid and rectal resection (P < 0.001) groups. Stapled and sutured anastomoses are equally effective. Stapled anastomoses are not efficient, however, and should be reserved for individual indications.


Assuntos
Colectomia/economia , Gastrectomia/economia , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Técnicas de Sutura/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/economia , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Chirurg ; 68(4): 416-24, 1997 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9206638

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of decontamination as compared to placebo medication on post-gastrectomy treatment costs. The results of a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial indicate that perioperative i.v. prophylaxis with cefotaxim and topical decontamination with polymyxin B, tobramycin, vancomycin and amphotericin B from the day before surgery until the 7th postoperative day is most effective in the prevention of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following total gastrectomy. For the cost analysis, only patients who had been decontaminated according to the study protocol (n = 90) were compared to the non-decontaminated patients (n = 103). The esophagojejunal leakage rate was 10.6% in placebo patients (n = 103) and could be reduced significantly to 1.1% in decontaminated patients (n = 90, P = 0.0061; two-tailed Fisher's exact test). There was only one asymptomatic leakage detected on Gastrografin swallow. The pulmonary infection (P = 0.0173) and overall complication rates (p = 0.0238) were significantly reduced in the decontamination group as well. During the observation period, 9 (8.7%) patients in the placebo group and 3 (3.3%) in the decontaminated group died (P = n.s.). Patients were followed up for the initial 42 postoperative days and treatment costs were calculated for this time period only. The parameters compiled in the study pertaining to use of medical resources formed the basis for the determination of the postoperative treatment costs. These were the costs for decontaminating drugs, intravenous antibiotics, reoperations and non-surgical reinterventions as well as daily treatment costs of the general ward, the intensive care unit (ICU) and rehabilitation. The average costs per patient in the placebo group amounted to DM 20,000 while the costs for decontaminated patients were only DM 16,200, which was due to a significantly lower number of patients requiring treatment in the ICU (P = 0.0082), significantly fewer patients requiring i.v. antibiotics (P = 0.0232) and fewer patients with reoperations (P = 0.0909). The prophylaxis employing decontaminating drugs in the amount of DM 400 lowered post-gastrectomy treatment costs by DM 3800 or 19%. The prophylaxis can be recommended, because it lowers morbidity, mortality and the costs of total gastrectomy.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Gastrectomia/economia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Anfotericina B/administração & dosagem , Cefotaxima/administração & dosagem , Redução de Custos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimixina B/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/economia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/mortalidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tobramicina/administração & dosagem , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
17.
Zentralbl Chir ; 122(1): 9-13, 1997.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9133140

RESUMO

The necessity of limiting health care costs requires adequate service recording and quality control even in visceral surgery. In this field, the safety of the anastomoses is of greatest importance. Anastomoses at risk are esophageal connections to jejunum or colon and deep rectal anastomoses. At these locations expensive suture devices, such as stapling instruments, can be used in a cost saving aspect, if they help to increase anastomotic safety, time saving and expansion of surgical indication. Manual sutures thus represent the cheapest anastomotic technique as continuous sutures would cost between DM 10.- to 20.- and single stitch sutures between DM 60.- and 100.-. A surgical school should prevalently aim at training manual anastomoses, while special anastomotic techniques should only complete the skill for selected indications. The overall staff expenditure for extended operations amounts around DM 600.- per hour respectively DM 10.- per minute. Time for surgery might be shortened by auxiliary tools as much as to perform an additional operation. However, a circular stapler anastomosis that costs between DM 650.- to 850.- is twice as expensive as manual sutures notwithstanding the double time needed. In the past years, the necessity for a rational use of different anastomotic techniques has shown to be mandatory since, increasingly, financial aspects of health economy require cost benefit calculations in visceral surgery.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Alemanha , Humanos , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Sutura/economia
18.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 10(6): 558-62, 1996 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8989972

RESUMO

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) is currently being used in the treatment of nonhealing or "problem" wounds of the lower extremities. In an attempt to evaluate the efficacy of HBO in problem wounds, a retrospective study of the HBO experience at Orlando Regional Medical Center was conducted. From 1989 to 1994, fifty-four patients with nonhealing lower extremity wounds resulting from underlying peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes mellitus were treated with HBO. Wounds were grouped into the following five categories: (1) diabetic ulcers (n = 17 [31%]); (2) arterial insufficiency (n = 8 [15%]); (3) gangrenous lesions (n = 6 [11%]); (4) nonhealing amputation stumps (n = 13 [24%]); and (5) nonhealing operative wounds (n = 10 [19%]). Each patient received an average of 30 treatments. Outcomes for all 54 patients treated with HBO in this study were dismal. None of the patients experienced complete healing, six (11%) showed some improvement, 43 (80%) showed no improvement, and in five cases (9%) results were inconclusive because these patients underwent concomitant revascularization or amputation. Thirty-eight of the 43 patients who showed no improvement (88%) ultimately required at least one surgical procedure to treat their wounds. Thirty-four patients (63%) developed complications, most commonly barotrauma to the ears, which occurred in 23 patients (43%). The average cost of 30 HBO treatments was $14,000 excluding daily inpatient charges. Based on the experience with HBO therapy at Orlando Regional Medical Center and the paucity of good supporting literature, it is difficult to justify such an expensive, ineffective complication-prone treatment modality for problem extremity wounds.


Assuntos
Neuropatias Diabéticas/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Traumatismos da Perna/terapia , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/terapia , Cicatrização , Cotos de Amputação , Barotrauma/etiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Neuropatias Diabéticas/economia , Feminino , Gangrena , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efeitos adversos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/economia , Traumatismos da Perna/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/economia , Dedos do Pé/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA