Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of recombinant, fully human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody (MW031) versus denosumab in Chinese healthy subjects: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: MW031 is a biosimilar candidate of denosumab (Prolia®). This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MW031 to denosumab in healthy Chinese participants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, single-dose trial, participants were given 60 mg MW031 (N = 58) or denosumab (N = 61) by subcutaneous injection and observed for 140 days. The primary endpoint was the bioequivalence of PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-∞), and secondary endpoints including PD parameter, safety, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: A comparison of main PK parameters showed that the geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of AUC0-∞ and Cmax for MW031 over denosumab were 105.48% (98.96%, 112.43%) and 98.58% (92.78%, 104.75%), respectively. The inter-CV values of AUC0-∞ and Cmax for MW031 ranged from 19.9% to 23.1%. PD parameter (sCTX) in the MW031 and denosumab groups were similar, and the positivity rates of immunogenicity were 0% in both groups. This study also showed similar safety profiles in both groups, and there were no drug-related, high-incidence and previously unreported adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed similar pharmacokinetic profiles of MW031 and denosumab in healthy male participants, and pharmacodynamic profile, immunogenicity and safety were comparable for both drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04798313; CTR20201149.

RANKL as a target for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis is characterized by compromised bone strength, predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. Because bone is constantly remodeled, and bone mass and structure are determined by the balance between bone resorption and bone formation, it is important to maintain normal bone turnover. Therefore, therapies that reduce bone resorption have been the mainstream of osteoporosis treatment. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-RANK signaling was found to play a pivotal role in the regulation of osteoclastic bone resorption, and inhibition of RANKL-RANK system has become an important therapeutic target for the treatment of osteoporosis. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-RANKL neutralizing antibody, is developed as a drug for the treatment of osteoporosis. This review summarized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of denosumab, clinical studies including phase 2 dose-ranging and its extension study, phase 3 fracture prevention study (FREEDOM) with extension up to 10 years, studies on male osteoporosis (ADAMO study), and on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, along with relevant clinical studies in Japan. In addition, mechanism of denosumab action that can explain its long-term sustained effects, combination and sequential treatment as well as the problems in discontinuation of denosumab, and finally safety of denosumab therapy is discussed.

Current Treatments and New Developments in the Management of Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are often used for improvement of quality of life, particularly in the elderly, but long-term GC use may cause harm; bone loss and fractures are among the most devastating side effects. Fracture risk is particularly high in patients with a severe underlying disease with an urgent need for treatment with high-dose GCs. Moreover, it is important to realize that these patients suffer from an augmented background fracture risk as these patients have a high presence of traditional risk factors for osteoporosis, such as high age, low body mass index (BMI), smoking and relatives with osteoporosis or hip fractures. It is thus crucial for prevention of osteoporotic fractures to use the lowest dose of GC for a short period of time to prevent fractures. Another important task is optimal treatment of the underlying disease; for instance, fracture risk is higher in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis than in patients in whom rheumatoid arthritis is in remission. Thus, fracture risk is generally highest in the early phase, when GC dosage and the disease activity of the underlying disease are high. Finally, some of the traditional risk factors can be modulated, e.g., smoking and low BMI. Life-style measures, such as adequate amounts of calcium and vitamin D and exercise therapy are also crucial. In some patients, anti-osteoporotic drugs are also indicated. In general, oral bisphosphonates (BPs) are the first choice, because of their efficacy and safety combined with the low cost of the drug. However, for those patients who do not tolerate oral BPs, alternatives ("second-line therapies") are available: BP intravenously (zoledronic acid), denosumab (Dmab), and teriparatide. Both zoledronic acid and Dmab have been proven to be superior to oral bisphosphonates like risedronate in improvement of bone mineral density. For teriparatide, vertebral fracture reduction has been shown in comparison with alendronate. Thus, to reduce the global burden of GC use and fracture risk, fracture risk management in GC users should involve at least involve life-style measures and the use of the lowest possible dose of GC. In high-risk patients, anti-osteoporotic drugs should be initiated. First choice drugs are oral BPs; however, in those with contraindications and those who do not tolerate oral BPs, second-line therapies should be started. Although this is a reasonable treatment algorithm, an unmet need is that the most pivotal (second-line) drugs are not used in daily clinical practice at the initial phase, usually characterized by high-dose GC and active underlying disease, when they are most needed. In some patients second-line drugs are started later in the disease course, with lower GC dosages and higher disease activity. As this is a paradox, we think it is a challenge for physicians and expert committees to develop an algorithm with clear indications in which specific patient groups second-line anti-osteoporotic drugs should or could be initiated as first-choice treatment.

Antiresorptive agents' bone-protective and adjuvant effects in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

Potent antiresorptive drugs (bisphosphonate and denosumab) are often used to protect bone health in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. In addition, clinical trials have shown that these drugs increase disease-free survival, though the mechanism of adjuvant benefit is largely unknown. Here we review the bone health and adjuvant data for both classes of antiresorptive drugs and highlight differences in their pharmacology. Inhibition of bone resorption is vitally important to protect against osteoporotic fractures, and may also contribute to adjuvant survival benefits by making the bone microenvironment less amenable to breast cancer metastasis. After a course of therapy, stoppage of bisphosphonates yields a persistent antiresorptive effect, whereas discontinuation of denosumab causes a rebound increase in bone resorption markers and a loss of bone mineral density to baseline levels. Whether the potential adjuvant benefits of denosumab are also rapidly lost after drug discontinuation deserves further investigation.

Denosumab: A Review in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Denosumab (Prolia®; Pralia®) is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the key bone resorption mediator RANKL. The drug is administered via subcutaneous injection once every 6 months and is approved for various indications, including the treatment of postmenopausal (PM) women with osteoporosis at increased/high risk of fracture or failure/intolerance of other osteoporosis therapies (indications featured in this review). Denosumab showed benefit in several phase 3 or 4 studies in PM women with osteoporosis or low bone mineral density (BMD), including the pivotal 3-year double-blind FREEDOM trial and its 7-year open-label extension. Denosumab reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures and increased BMD across skeletal sites versus placebo in FREEDOM, with these benefits maintained over up to 10 years' therapy in the extension. The drug was also more effective in improving BMD than bisphosphonates, including in women switched from a bisphosphonate regimen, in 1-year trials; however, whether these differences translate into differences in anti-fracture efficacy is unclear. Denosumab was generally well tolerated over up to 10 years' treatment, although an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures was observed after discontinuation of the drug. Thus, denosumab is a key treatment option for PM women with osteoporosis who have an increased/high risk of fracture or failure/intolerance of other osteoporosis therapies, although the potential for multiple vertebral fractures to occur after discontinuation of the drug requires consideration of subsequent management options.

Novel strategy using tryptic peptide immunoaffinity-based LC-MS/MS to quantify denosumab in monkey serum.

AIM: Denosumab is a recombinant fully human IgG2 that has a high affinity and specificity for human RANKL. Commercially available RANKL labeled with an Fc fragment cannot be used to establish an indirect ELISA. To characterize denosumab pharmacokinetic a robust and accuracy method should be developed urgently. RESULTS: In this study, an immunoaffinity enrichment method coupled with LC-MS/MS was established. The LC-MS/MS method acquired a linear range from 0.1 to 30 µg/ml. The intra- and inter-run precision (CV%) was within 11.5 and 10.5%, respectively. More importantly, the LC-MS/MS pharmacokinetic data were consistent with ELISA. CONCLUSION: This approach accelerated the quantification, reduced the costs and provided an alternative in case of lacking the special antigen to denosumab or a RANKL-biotinylated reagent.

[Pharmacokinetics of anti-RANKL antibody drugs:Denosumab.]

Antibody drug is a kind of glycoprotein which molecular weight is over one hundred thousand. The number of pharmaceutical approval of antibody drug has been increasing in recent years. In terms of a working mechanism and pharmacokinetics, antibody drug is markedly different from existing low molecular weight drugs. In prospect, about body kinetics is the same. This paper describes general features of antibody drug mainly about internal kinetics in the first half. In the last half, body kinetics of human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody called Denosumab and body kinetics changes in special population are outlined.

An open-label study in healthy men to evaluate the risk of seminal fluid transmission of denosumab to pregnant partners.

AIMS: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 antibody that inhibits bone resorption and increases bone mass and strength. The present clinical study assessed serum and seminal fluid pharmacokinetics following a single denosumab dose in healthy men, and evaluated whether denosumab in seminal fluid poses any risk to a fetus in the event of unprotected sexual intercourse with a pregnant partner. METHODS: An open-label, single-dose study in 12 healthy men was conducted over a 106-day period. Subjects received a single subcutaneous dose of 60-mg denosumab on day 1. Serum and seminal fluid samples were collected at specified time points to assess denosumab pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Denosumab was measurable at low concentrations in seminal fluid (~2% of serum concentrations). The mean [standard deviation (SD)] maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax ) was 6170 (2070) ng ml(-1) (serum) and 100 (81.9) ng ml(-1) (seminal fluid). The median time to Cmax (tmax ) was 8 days (serum) and 21 days (seminal fluid). The mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) was 333 000 (122 000) day•ng ml(-1) (serum) and 5220 (4880) day•ng ml(-1) (seminal fluid). The mean (SD) Cmax and AUC ratios between seminal fluid and serum were 0.0217 (0.0154) and 0.0170 (0.0148), respectively. Using conservative assumptions for ejaculate volume (6 ml), vaginal absorption (100%) and placental transfer (100%), the measured mean denosumab seminal fluid Cmax would result in fetal exposure that was more than 110 times below the preclinically derived 'no effect level' for denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a negligible risk to a fetus exposed to denosumab via seminal fluid transfer to a pregnant partner.

A comprehensive review of denosumab for bone metastasis in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Denosumab is fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds and inactivates receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL), an important ligand that regulates bone remodeling. In this review, we aimed to show the clinical data about denosumab treatment and discuss its advantages for the management of patients with solid tumors and bone metastasis. SCOPE: Denosumab showed positive results in clinical studies of solid tumors with bone metastasis. PubMed database and ASCO Symposium Meeting abstracts were searched until August 2015 by using the terms 'denosumab', 'RANKL inhibitor' and 'bone metastasis'. The last search was on 21 August 2015. All resulting studies were retrieved and were also checked for related publications. Clinical trials in this review fulfilled the following criterion: inclusion of sufficient data to allow estimation of the efficacy and safety of denosumab. FINDINGS: The effects of denosumab on skeletal-related events (SREs) were investigated in three large randomized trials: one in patients with breast cancer, one in patients with prostate cancer, and one in patients with multiple myeloma or solid tumors other than breast or prostate cancer. In the breast cancer and prostate cancer studies denosumab was non-inferior and also superior to zoledronic acid in terms of the primary outcome time to first on-study SRE. In the third study denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid but was not superior to zoledronic acid in solid tumors excluding breast and prostate cancer with bone metastases. In the three studies median overall survival and disease progression rates were similar between zoledronic acid and denosumab. Denosumab has also been studied in bone loss associated with hormonal therapy in both breast and prostate cancer. Adjuvant denosumab significantly reduced the risk of clinical fracture risk by 50% in breast cancer patients and by 62% in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors or androgen deprivation therapy. In addition, biochemical markers of bone turnover and fractures were significantly reduced in patients under denosumab treatment. CONCLUSION: The promising outcomes in the initial trials with denosumab have shown clinical activity and a favorable safety profile in patients with solid tumors and bone metastasis. Denosumab significantly reduced treatment-related osteoporosis associated with breast and prostate cancer and was superior to zoledronic acid in prevention or delaying of SRE.

Denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a case report and management based on pharmacokinetics.

Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator for nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), is a recently approved antiresorptive drug that suppresses osteoclast formation by targeting preosteclasts, in contrast to the traditional antiresorptive bisphosphonates that target mature osteoclasts. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a well-known, if rare, side effect of bisphosphonate therapy; however, cases of ONJ have also been reported since 2010 in patients taking denosumab. We describe here a patient who developed ONJ while receiving denosumab; the pharmacokinetics of denosumab and bisphosphonates are discussed in the context of ONJ management.