Illness Perceptions of Patients with Occupational Skin Diseases in a Healthcare Centre for Tertiary Prevention: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objectives: To investigate the illness perceptions of patients with occupational skin diseases (OSDs). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Specialised healthcare centre for inpatient and outpatient individual prevention in occupational dermatology in Germany. Participants: A total of 248 patients with hand eczema (55.2% female; average age: 48.5 years, SD: 11.9) were included in the final analyses. Measures: A modified and recently validated version of the 'Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire' (IPQ-R) was used to assess illness perceptions. Severity of skin disease was evaluated with the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI), and a single, self-reported global item. The Erlangen Atopy Score (EAS) was used for atopy screening. Results: We found strong illness identity, high emotional impact, and long timeline beliefs, meaning that study participants perceive their OSD on the hands as a highly symptomatic, emotionally burdening, and chronic condition. Results suggest that hand eczema has a major impact on how participants manage their own lives, particularly during everyday life and occupational activities. Study participants predominantly identified irritant or sensitising substances and activities at work as well as skin protection regimes as causes of their disease. Conclusions: Healthcare workers should consider the illness perceptions as well as the disease burden of patients with an OSD on the hands in clinical practice. Multi-professional approaches to patient care should be sought. Illness perception in (occupational) dermatological patients should be the subject of further research.

Treatment with alitretinoin in patients taking part in a tertiary individual prevention program for work-related skin diseases.

BACKGROUND: Patients taking part in a tertiary individual prevention program (TIP) for work-related skin diseases frequently have chronic hand eczema (HE) for which alitretinoin is a treatment option. OBJECTIVE: To investigate treatment with alitretinoin before and during the TIP and related factors. METHODS: Data of 1614 patients taking part in the TIP between January 2015 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight patients (21.6%) reported treatment with alitretinoin prior to the TIP showing an increase over time, particularly in men. In 45 patients (2.8%), alitretinoin treatment was initiated during the TIP. Treatment with alitretinoin was significantly less common among female than male patients, both prior to (P < .001) and during the TIP (P = .015). Female patients who had received alitretinoin in the past were significantly older than the other female patients (P < .001). Among patients treated with alitretinoin prior to the TIP, women had a significantly higher disease severity at admission than men (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: About twenty percent of patients reported treatment with alitretinoin prior to the TIP. The data indicate that treatment of female TIP patients with alitretinoin is less frequent than among male patients and depends on age and disease severity.

Effectiveness of secondary prevention in metalworkers with work-related skin diseases and comparison with participants of a tertiary prevention program: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, a multistep approach has been established to prevent work-related skin diseases (WRSDs). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a secondary individual prevention program (SIP) in metalworkers with WRSD and to compare their characteristics with those of participants of a tertiary individual prevention program (TIP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, metalworkers with WRSD of the hands participating either in the SIP (n = 114) or in the TIP (n = 83) were recruited. At baseline and at the respective follow-up 8-12 weeks after the SIP or at dismissal from the TIP (3-4 weeks later), questionnaires were completed and the severity of WRSD was assessed. Saliva samples were collected for assessment of filaggrin (FLG) mutations and an explorative genome-wide association study (GWAS). RESULTS: Ninety-three SIP patients (81.6%) attended the follow-up. Disease severity was significantly reduced, and knowledge and protective behavior were significantly improved compared to baseline. Significant differences between SIP and TIP patients were found regarding duration and severity of symptoms, work absenteeism, tobacco smoking, and presence of atopic dermatitis, but not regarding FLG mutations and by GWAS. CONCLUSIONS: The SIP was effective in metalworkers with WRSDs. Individual factors may influence the course of the disease and the need for the TIP.

Health education decreases incidence of hand eczema in metal work apprentices: Results of a controlled intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Metal work apprentices (MWAs) frequently develop work-related hand eczema (HE). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of health education on incidence of work-related HE in MWAs and to assess confounding factors. MATERIALS/METHODS: In a prospective controlled intervention study, 131 MWAs received educational training on prevention of HE, whereas 172 MWAs and 118 office work apprentices served as controls. At baseline and during three yearly follow-ups, questionnaires were completed and hands were examined. Saliva samples were collected for assessment of filaggrin (FLG) null mutations and an explorative genome-wide association study (GWAS), and levels of various cytokines were assessed from stratum corneum samples. RESULTS: The 2-year and 3-year incidence of HE in the metalwork control group was 20.9% and 32.6%, respectively, which was significantly higher than in the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31 to 5.28, P < .01 and OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.88 to 6.40, P < .0001). The knowledge score was higher in unaffected MWAs (P < .05). Other factors significantly associated with developing HE in MWAs were smoking cigarettes (P < .01) and FLG mutations (P < .001). No significant associations were found regarding epidermal cytokine levels and GWAS. CONCLUSIONS: Health education is effective in primary prevention of HE in MWAs. Individual factors should be considered in targeted counseling.

Efficacy and safety of a rosehip seed oil extract in the prevention and treatment of skin lesions in the hands of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus caused by finger prick blood glucose monitoring; a randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial. / Eficacia y seguridad del aceite de rosa mosqueta en las lesiones de los dedos provocadas por las punciones capilares para el control glucémico en niños con diabetes tipo 1; un ensayo clínico aleatorizado, abierto, controlado.

INTRODUCTION: This study was intended to assess the efficacy and safety of a rosehip seed oil (RHO) extract in the prevention and treatment of skin lesions in the hands of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) caused by finger prick blood glucose monitoring. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, rater-blinded trial in patients aged 6-17 years with T1DM and intensive blood glucose control (≥7 finger pricks daily) for 12 days. Three main variables (erythema, skin thickening, and loss of skin integrity) were assessed using a scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe involvement). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. RESULTS: Sixty-eight children, and thus 136 hands, were included; 80 hands received rosehip seed oil and 56 hands acted as controls. Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar, with 76.3% and 78.6% of the hands respectively showing skin lesions at study start. Median final global assessment was 0.10 (0.03; 0.30) in the group that received rosehip seed oil and 0.06 (0.00; 0.23) in the control group. A statistically significant improvement in global assessment was found in the control group (P=0.049). No significant differences were found when the medians of the other main variables were compared. No adverse effects were recorded. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of skin lesions secondary to finger prick glucose monitoring, most of them mild lesions, was found at study start. Treatment with rosehip seed oil was safe and was not effective for improving skin lesions.

Intravenous immunoglobulin contributes to the control of antimelanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 antibody-associated dermatomyositis with palmar violaceous macules/papules.

Autoantibodies to melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) are associated with a subset of patients with dermatomyositis (DM) who have rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) with poor prognosis. Intensive immunosuppressive therapy is initiated before irreversible lung damage can occur; however, there are few lines of evidence for the treatment of RP-ILD. Here, we report three cases of anti-MDA5 antibody-associated DM with RP-ILD in which the patients were treated with combined-modality therapy, including high-dose prednisolone, tacrolimus, intravenous cyclophosphamide and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). In all three cases, serum ferritin levels, which are known to represent the disease activity of RP-ILD, were decreased after IVIG administration. IVIG might contribute to the control of the disease activity of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM. Moreover, palmar violaceous macules/papules around the interphalangeal joints, which was observed in all three cases in the incipient stage, might be a useful sign in suggesting a diagnosis of anti-MDA5 antibody-associated DM.

Occupational skin diseases in hairdressing apprentices - has anything changed?

BACKGROUND: Hairdressers are at risk for occupational skin diseases. Since 2008, an educational programme has been conducted in Danish hairdressing schools to prevent occupational skin diseases. Its effect is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the current frequency of self-reported hand eczema and contact urticaria in Danish hairdressing apprentices as compared with controls, and to determine the occurrence of hand eczema and contact urticaria in hairdressing apprentices with different durations of exposure to the trade. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire study conducted among 504 hairdressing apprentices and a control group of 1400 adolescents from the general population. RESULTS: Hand eczema was significantly more prevalent in the hairdressing apprentices than in controls (34.5% versus 18.8%, p < 0.001). The incidence rate of hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices was 98 cases/1000 person-years. Contact urticaria was also more prevalent in the hairdressing apprentices (7.3% versus 4.2%, p = 0.006). Both diseases increased with increasing duration of exposure to the trade. CONCLUSION: Despite educational efforts to prevent occupational skin diseases in the hairdressing schools, Danish apprentices are still at increased risk for hand eczema and contact urticaria. Both diseases develop after only a few years of work in hairdressing. Further preventive strategies are warranted.

Subjective illness perceptions in individuals with occupational skin disease: a qualitative investigation.

OBJECTIVE: Occupational skin disease (OSD) is the most frequent work-related disease in most industrialised countries and poses a high social, economic and personal burden. However, to date no study has examined the illness perceptions of individuals with refractory OSD. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Semi-structured guided interviews with 50 patients with OSD were conducted. Data was subjected to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Most patients were not able to see the prodromal symptom-character of dry skin or the involvement of psychological factors in the formation and maintenance of eczema. Patients rejected a personal accountability for the condition. Before being willing to act upon skin protection measures, external agencies (employer, insurance organisations) have to overcome a variety of perceived barriers. Previous negative experiences with skin protection often lead to the conclusion that these measures, in general, are not efficacious. CONCLUSIONS: In order to accommodate the needs of patients with OSD, health care providers need to be aware of what these patients' illness cognitions consist of, and how they interact with current preventive efforts. Many details of the patient's perspective are often overlooked, but need to be considered. Failure to do so may mean that well-meant interventions will not reach the addressed audience successfully.

Fundamentos sobre o conhecimento dos aditivos químicos presentes nas luvas de borracha / Fundamentals of the knowledge about chemical additives present in rubber gloves

FUNDAMENTOS: Uma das causas mais frequentes de dermatite de contato alérgica, de origem ocupacional, são os aditivos da borracha, presentes nos Equipamentos de Proteção Individual. Os aditivos das luvas natural e sintética mais alergênicos são tiurams, mercaptos e carbamatos. OBJETIVO: levantar o nível de conhecimento em relação aos aditivos químicos utilizados na fabricação das luvas de borracha sintética. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado um questionário aberto a profissionais que trabalham com fabricação, pesquisa, prescrição e comercialização das luvas. Foi adotado o método de pesquisa qualitativa. RESULTADOS: Foram entrevistadas 30 pessoas: 4 pesquisadores na área de Medicina do Trabalho, 5 médicos do Trabalho, 2 técnicos de segurança do Trabalho, 1 médico do sindicato de trabalhadores da borracha, 1 engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho, 1 engenheira de Produção do setor de fabricação de luvas de borracha, 4 empresários importadores de luvas, 1 empresário fabricante de luvas, 3 empresários que comercializavam Equipamentos de Proteção Individual, 3 vendedores de lojas de Equipamentos de Proteção Individual, 2 empresários de lojas que comercializavam produtos para alérgicos e 3 dermatologistas. CONCLUSÃO: O conhecimento da composição química das luvas é pequeno. A rotulagem das luvas, com a descrição da composição química, facilitaria a escolha do melhor tipo de luva para cada pessoa. Esta ação, de baixo custo para as empresas, seria um ganho, do ponto de vista da saúde pública, e teria grande repercussão nos usuários de luvas de borracha.

BACKGROUNDS: One of the most frequent causes of allergic contact dermatitis of occupational origin are rubber additives, which are present in Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The most allergenic additives of natural and synthetic gloves are thiurams, carbamates and mercapto group. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the state of knowledge about the chemical additives used in the manufacture of synthetic rubber gloves. METHODS: This was a qualitative research study in which professionals working in the manufacture, research, prescription and commercialization of gloves answered an open questionnaire. RESULTS: 30 individuals were interviewed: 4 researchers in occupational medicine, 5 occupational physicians, 2 occupational safety technicians, a rubber workers' union physician, an occupational safety engineer, a pro duction engineer of rubber gloves, 4 importers of gloves, a manufacturer of gloves, 3 businessmen who sell PPE, 3 salesclerks working in stores that sell PPE, 2 businessmen who own stores that sell products for allergic indivi duals, and 3 dermatologists. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the chemical composition of rubber gloves is scant. The labeling of gloves, with the description of their chemical composition, would facilitate choosing the best type of glove for each person. This low-cost action to businesses would be a gain from the standpoint of public health, with huge repercussions for users of rubber gloves.

[Main treatment and preventive measures for hand-foot syndrome, a dermatologic side effect of cancer therapy]. / A daganatterápia egyik dermatológiai mellékhatása, a kéz-láb szindróma fõbb kezelési és megelõzési elvei.

Hand-foot syndrome is a highly unpleasant adverse reaction caused by treatment protocols containing capecitabine (an orally administered drug), docetaxel, liposomal doxorubicin infusions or continuously infused 5-fluorouracil. It affects the skin of the palms and soles manifesting characteristic symptoms like erythema, inflammation, dysesthesia, pain, thickening, desquamation and cracking of the skin that may progress to cause wounds and ulceration, negatively influencing quality of life, psychological state and belief in recovery, which often result in the need of permanent or temporary interruption of the oncologic treatment and are potential sources of danger to the completion of the therapy. Adequate provision of the syndrome is of particular importance since a decline in adherence due to adverse events endangers precise maintenance of the self-sufficient oral treatment at home. Early recognition of symptoms, regular oncologic checkups and patient education on how to prevent or soothe the unpleasant skin toxicities could ensure a more successful treatment.

Management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hand-foot skin reaction: viewpoints from the medical oncologist, dermatologist, and oncology nurse.

One significant toxicity associated with the anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR). We provide an overview of HFSR, emphasizing experience-based prevention techniques and nursing management strategies from the viewpoints of a medical oncologist, a dermatologist, and an oncology nurse. Supporting data include (1) published preclinical and phase I-III clinical studies and (2) published abstracts of phase II-III clinical trials of sorafenib and sunitinib. HFSR has been reported in up to 60% of patients treated with sorafenib or sunitinib. TKI-induced HFSR may lead to dose reductions or treatment interruptions and reduced quality of life. Symptoms of TKI-associated HFSR can be managed by implementing supportive measures and aggressive dose modification. Patients educated about HFSR can work with their health-care teams to proactively detect and help manage this cutaneous toxicity, thus preventing or reducing the severity of TKI-associated HFSR. Successful prevention and management of TKI-associated HFSR can help to ensure that patients achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes. Implementation of such measures may increase the likelihood that therapy is continued for the appropriate interval at an appropriate dose for each patient. Optimal management of TKI-associated HFSR is predicated on establishing appropriate partnerships amongmedical oncologists, dermatologists, oncology nurses, and patients.

How to quantify skin impairment in primary and secondary prevention? HEROS: a proposal of a hand eczema score for occupational screenings.

BACKGROUND: Skin scoring systems have to meet specific demands depending on their particular settings and indications, e.g. occupational screenings vs. clinical examinations, evaluating progress of treatment or supervision of preventive strategies. Until now, most scoring systems have been developed for severe cases of hand eczema. A validated quantitative scoring system for early hand eczema is still missing. OBJECTIVES: The present cross-sectional study was aimed at assessing the practical value of a quantitative hand eczema score for occupational screenings (HEROS) at the workplace and its potential for identifying individuals at increased risk of work-related skin disease. METHODS: Both hands of 800 male metal workers were examined for characteristic morphological patterns of hand dermatitis and quantified with HEROS. The score was validated by testing inter- and intraobserver reliability in random samples. Results of validation were compared with three already validated skin scores for distinct hand eczema (Osnabrück hand eczema severity index, hand eczema severity index, Manuscore). RESULTS: The score values ranged from 0 to 82 (theoretical maximum 2260), reflecting the skin condition of healthy, fit-for-work subjects. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was good to excellent. Results for reliability of the HEROS were in line with all three validated scores for hand eczema. The predictive value for identifying persons at increased risk for developing hand eczema was low. CONCLUSIONS: The HEROS seems to be an adequate tool for observer near-independent assessment of early hand eczema, especially for quantifying minimal skin impairment. Therefore, we propose the implementation of this scoring system for quantifying early hand dermatitis in occupational screenings.

Placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a urea/lactic acid-based topical keratolytic agent for prevention of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N05C5.

PURPOSE: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine for which no effective preventative treatment has been definitively demonstrated. This trial was conducted on the basis of preliminary data that a urea/lactic acid-based topical keratolytic agent (ULABTKA) may prevent HFS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind phase III trial evaluated 137 patients receiving their first ever cycle of capecitabine at a dose of either 2,000 or 2,500 mg/m(2) per day for 14 days. Patients were randomly assigned to a ULABTKA versus a placebo cream, which was applied to the hands and feet twice per day for 21 days after the start of capecitabine. Patients completed an HFS diary (HFSD) daily. HFS toxicity grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v3.0) was also collected at baseline and at the end of each cycle. The primary end point was the incidence of moderate/severe HFS symptoms in the first treatment cycle, based on the patient-reported HFSD. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with moderate/severe HFS symptoms was not different between groups, being 13.6% in the ULABTKA arm and 10.2% in the placebo arm (P = .768 by Fisher's exact test). The odds ratio was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.37 to 5.76). Cycle 1 CTCAE skin toxicity was higher in the ULABTKA arm but not significantly so (33% v 27%; P = .82). No significant differences were observed in other toxicities between groups. CONCLUSION: These data do not support the efficacy of a ULABTKA cream for preventing HFS symptoms in patients receiving capecitabine.

Randomized trial of two different doses of pyridoxine in the prevention of capecitabine-associated palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of 200 mg versus 400 mg daily of pyridoxine in preventing or delaying the onset of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) in capecitabine-treated patients. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer or colorectal cancer receiving single agent capecitabine started at 2000 to 2500 mg/m(2) daily from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks were randomly assigned to receive 200 mg or 400 mg daily of pyridoxine for PPE prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the reduction of incidence of grade 2 or greater PPE. Secondary endpoints were reduction of severe PPE and prolongation of time to development of grade 2 or greater PPE. RESULTS: There were 56 patients in this study. The baseline characteristics were generally similar in both groups. The high dose arm had less PPE than the low dose arm (11 of 28 or 39% vs 20 of 28 or 71%, relative risk = 0.26 [0.08, 0.79], P = 0.031). Grade III PPE developed in 3 of 28 (10.7%) versus none in patients receiving 200 mg versus 400 mg pyridoxine, respectively (relative risk 2.12 [1.594, 2.819], P = 0.24). High dose pyridoxine had a longer time to development of grade 2 or greater PPE compared to the low dose arm, 87 days versus 62 days. The 400 mg pyridoxine group had, however, a worsened tumor response and tended to have greater tumor treatment failure and shorter time to treatment failure. CONCLUSION: With the limitation of sample size in this study, there was a trend to improve PPE incidence and time to event with a higher dose of pyridoxine. Further validation of these results in a larger population is warranted.

Pyridoxine is not effective to prevent hand-foot syndrome associated with capecitabine therapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether concurrent pyridoxine therapy can prevent the development of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in patients being treated with capecitabine. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with GI tract cancers scheduled for capecitabine-containing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to concurrent oral pyridoxine (200 mg/d) or placebo. Patients were stratified by chemotherapy regimen and monitored until development of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 2 or worse HFS or capecitabine-containing chemotherapy ended. Patients in the placebo group who developed grade 2 or worse HFS were randomly assigned again to receive pyridoxine or placebo in the next chemotherapy cycle to determine whether pyridoxine could improve HFS. RESULTS: The median number of chemotherapy cycles to grade 2 or worse HFS was three in both groups. Grade 2 or worse HFS developed in 55 (30.6%) of 180 placebo-treated patients and in 57 (31.7%) of 180 pyridoxine patients. The cumulative dose of capecitabine to grade 2 or worse HFS was not different between the two groups (median not reached in either group; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; P = .788). Randomization of the 44 patients in the placebo group with grade 2 or worse HFS to placebo or pyridoxine for the next cycle resulted in no significant difference in the proportion showing improvement of HFS (42.9% v 47.8%; HR = 1.12; P = .94). By multivariate analysis, age > or = 56 years (HR = 1.768; 95% CI, 1.190 to 2.628; P = .005) was an independent risk factor for grade 2 or worse HFS, and combined use of docetaxel (HR = 2.046; 95% CI, 0.880 to 4.755; P = .096) was of borderline significance. CONCLUSION: Pyridoxine is not effective in prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS.

[Use of sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular or renal carcinoma]. / Bon usage du sorafénib chez les patients pris en charge pour un carcinome hépatocellulaire ou un cancer du rein.

Therapeutic approaches of cancers have been recently improved by the development of targeted therapies. Amongst these new drugs, some anti-angiogenic molecules have been approved by either the EMEA or the Food and Drug Administration. Sorafenib, one of these inhibitors of angiogenesis, has been established as the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular and renal carcinoma. This paper reviews the safety profile of sorafenib and presents guidelines for the prevention and the treatment of the main side effects associated with this molecule.

Impact of prophylactic pyridoxine on occurrence of hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine for advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has shown consistently high efficacy in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated advanced and metastatic breast cancer. The safety profile of capecitabine is characterized by hand-foot syndrome (HFS), which, although not life threatening, can impair patients' quality of life if it is not managed promptly and effectively. We conducted a study to assess the impact of prophylactic pyridoxine on HFS. METHODS: Prophylactic pyridoxine was given to 38 patients receiving capecitabine (alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide) for metastatic breast cancer and compared with historical data from 40 patients receiving capecitabine without pyridoxine in our clinic. The impact of urea ointment on HFS was also assessed. RESULTS: HFS developed in 20 patients (52.6%) receiving pyridoxine compared with historical data showing an 82.5% rate in patients receiving no pyridoxine prophylaxis (p < 0.01). A nonsignificant trend towards less severe HFS was seen among patients who received urea ointment at first appearance of symptoms. In addition, nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of HFS were seen among those who were ≥61 years and those who derived clinical benefit (clinical response or stable disease). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic pyridoxine and urea ointment at first appearance of symptoms appears to reduce the risk of severe capecitabine-induced HFS. However, randomized data are required to determine the true effect of these measures.

[Surgical team satisfaction levels between two preoperative hand-washing methods]. / Niveles de satisfacción del equipo quiúirgico entre dos métodos de lavado de mano.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, there have been new antiseptics for surgical scrub that do not require brushing. One of them contains 1% chlorhexidine gluconate and 61% ethyl alcohol; within its benefits, it may offer a low potential for skin sensitization, as well as cost savings and less use of water. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate satisfaction levels, washing time, safety, cost and amount of water between the traditional surgical scrub technique (group A) and brush-free surgical scrub procedure (group B). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred clean and clean-contaminated surgeries with four hundred members of surgical teams were included. Satisfaction levels, hand-washing time, skin disorders and problems associated with placement of gloves were evaluated. Hands cultures were taken in 20% of the population and the amount of water used by patients in group A was measured. Total costs and wound infections were analyzed. RESULTS: Satisfaction scale in group A was 9.1 +/- 1.39 and 9.5 +/- 1.54 in group B (p = 0.004). The mean hand-washing time was 3.9 +/- 1.07 min in group A and 2.0 +/- 0.47 min in group B (p = 0.00001). Thirteen patients had dry skin in group A and four in group B (6.5% vs. 2%; p = 0.02). There were ten positives cultures in group A and five in group B (25% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.152). Wound infection rate was 3%. On average, five-hundred eighty liters of water were used by the former group, and the estimated hand-washing cost was lower in the second group. CONCLUSIONS: The handwashing technique with CGEA is as effective as traditional surgical scrub technique, and it is associated with less washing time, dry skin, cost and use of water.