Effects of cerium oxide (CeO2) on liver tissue in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats undergoing desflurane anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: During liver surgery and transplantation, periods of partial or total vascular occlusion are inevitable and result in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Nanomedicine uses the latest technology, which has emerged with interdisciplinary effects, such as biomedical sciences, physics, and engineering, to protect and improve human health. Interdisciplinary research has brought along the introduction of antioxidant nanoparticles as potential therapeutics. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of cerium oxide (CeO2) administration and desflurane anesthesia on liver tissue in liver IR injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty rats were randomly divided into five groups: control (C), ischemia-reperfusion (IR), IR-desflurane (IRD), cerium oxide-ischemia reperfusion (CeO2-IR), and cerium oxide-ischemia reperfusion-desflurane (CeO2-IRD). In the IR, IRD, and CeO2-IRD groups, hepatic ischemia was induced after the porta hepatis was clamped for 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Intraperitoneal 0.5 mg/kg CeO2 was administered to the CeO2 groups 30 min before ischemia. Desflurane (6%) was administered to the IRD and CeO2-IRD groups during IR. All groups were sacrificed under anesthesia. Liver tissue samples were examined under a light microscope by staining with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, catalase (CAT), glutathione-s-transferase (GST), and arylesterase (ARE) enzyme activities were measured in the tissue samples. RESULTS: The IR group had considerably more hydropic degeneration, sinusoidal dilatation, and parenchymal mononuclear cell infiltration than the IRD, CeO2-IR, and CeO2-IRD groups. Catalase and GST enzyme activity were significantly higher in the CeO2-IR group than in the IR group. The MDA levels were found to be significantly lower in the IRD, CeO2-IR, and CeO2-IRD groups than in the IR group. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal CeO2 with desflurane reduced oxidative stress and corrected liver damage.

Hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion: a prospective randomized single-blind clinical investigation.

BACKGROUND: Desflurane is not recommended during anesthesia induction because of its sympathetic stimulation effect, particularly in patients with myocardial ischemic disease. To date, the hemodynamic response to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation in combination with remifentanil infusion during anesthesia induction has rarely been reported. METHODS: This investigation was designed to compare hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane (group D, n = 200) with sevoflurane (group S, n = 200) during anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Subgroup analysis of the different age subgroups was also performed. With continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg/min, anesthesia was induced with propofol bolus, and endotracheal intubation was performed after muscle relaxation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured every minute for 5 min after anesthesia induction (T1-5) and after endotracheal intubation (T6-10). RESULTS: HR was significantly higher in group D (n = 182) than in group S (n = 173) at T3-10 except at T6 (1 min after intubation) (all P < 0.05). In the age-based subgroup analyses, which subdivided the group D and S into four subgroups based on patient's age, the changes in HR from baseline values were significantly different between the coeval subgroups of patients in their 20-29 years and 30-39 years of age (all P < 0.05). MAP was reduced from baseline value, irrespective of group and age. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of 1 MAC desflurane during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion and during endotracheal intubation was more likely to induce elevations in HR more likely than 1 MAC sevoflurane, especially in younger patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr ) of the Republic of Korea on Feb 12, 2016 (Registration No. KCT 0,001,813).

Effect of combined intraoperative use of the Nociception Level (NOL) and bispectral (BIS) indexes on desflurane administration.

BACKGROUND: Currently, nociception monitors are not part of standard anaesthesia care. We investigated whether combined intraoperative nociception (NOL index) and anaesthesia (BIS index) monitoring during general anaesthesia would reduce anaesthetics consumption and enhance intraoperative safety and postoperative recovery when compared to standard of care monitoring (SOC). METHODS: In this randomised study, we included 60 patients undergoing colonic surgery under desflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia and epidural analgesia. Patients received either standard monitoring or combined BIS + NOL index monitoring. In the monitored group, remifentanil infusion was titrated to achieve a NOL index below 20. Desflurane was adjusted to BIS values (45-55). In the SOC group, remifentanil and desflurane were titrated on vital signs and MAC. The primary outcome was intraoperative desflurane consumption. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were analysed. Desflurane administration was reduced in the monitored group from 0.25 ± 0.05 to 0.20 ± 0.06 mL kg-1 h-1 (p < 0.001). The cumulative time with a BIS under 40 was significantly higher in the SOC group with a median time of 12.6 min (95% CI: 0.6-80.0) versus 2.0 min (95% CI: 0.3-5.83) (p = 0.023). Time for extubation was significantly shorter in the monitored group: 4.4 min (95% CI: 2.4-4.9) versus 6.28 min (95% IC: 5.0-8.2) (p = 0.003). We observed no differences in remifentanil or phenylephrine requirements during anaesthesia or in postoperative outcome measures, such as postoperative pain, opioid consumption, neurocognitive recovery. CONCLUSION: Combined intraoperative monitoring of anaesthesia and nociception during colonic surgery resulted in less desflurane consumption and quicker extubation time compared to standard clinical care monitoring.

Influence of hemorrhage and subsequent fluid resuscitation on transcranial motor-evoked potentials under desflurane anesthesia in a swine model.

PURPOSE: Hemorrhage increases the effect of propofol and could contribute to false-positive transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) responses under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). We investigated the influence of hemorrhage and subsequent fluid resuscitation on TcMEPs under desflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Sixteen swine (25.4 ± 0.4 kg) were anesthetized with a 4% end-tidal desflurane concentration (EtDes), which was incrementally increased to 6%, 8%, and 10% and then returned to 4% every 15 min. This procedure was repeated twice (baseline). After baseline measurements, animals were allocated to either the hemorrhage (n = 12) or control (n = 4) group. In the hemorrhage group, 600 ml of blood was removed and the EtDes protocol described above was applied. Hypovolemia was resuscitated using 600 ml of hydroxyethyl starch and the EtDes protocol was applied again. TcMEPs were measured at each EtDes. In the control group, measurements were performed without hemorrhage or fluid infusion. RESULTS: TcMEP responses were observed in all conditions in all limbs with 4% EtDes (0.4 MAC). TcMEP amplitudes decreased according to the EtDes to a greater degree in the lower limbs compared with the upper limbs. Hemorrhage enhanced the effect of desflurane on TcMEP amplitudes, and decreased TcMEP by 41 ± 12% in upper limbs and 63 ± 17% in lower limbs compared with baseline. Subsequent fluid resuscitation did not reverse TcMEP amplitudes. CONCLUSIONS: TcMEP amplitudes decrease during hemorrhage under desflurane anesthesia. This phenomenon might result from an enhanced effect of desflurane on the spinal motor pathway without increasing the desflurane concentration.

Effect of desflurane on changes in regional cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation is equivalent to the effect of propofol.

OBJECTIVES: Desaturation is an important clinical problem during one-lung ventilation (OLV) since it may induce cerebral hypoxia. Measurement of cerebral oxygenation has been shown to provide accurate information about episodes of cerebral hypoxemia. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of desflurane on changes in cerebral oxygenation during OLV with the effect of propofol. METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, prospective study was conducted. Fifty adult patients who were scheduled to undergo thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to anesthetic management using desflurane with remifentanil (Group D: n = 25) or using propofol and remifentanil (Group P: n = 25). RESULTS: The characteristics of the patients were very similar. Intergroup analysis of changes in cerebral oxygenation showed no significant difference on the operative side (two-way ANOVA, F (7, 368) = 0.425, p = 0.887) or the non-operative side (two-way ANOVA, F (7, 367) = 1.342, p = 0.229). Intragroup analysis of changes in cerebral oxygenation using one-way ANOVA showed no significant difference on the operative side (Group P; p = 0.585, Group D; p = 0.928) or the non-operative side in both groups (Group P; p = 0.657, Group D; p = 0.602). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of desflurane and propofol on changes in cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing OLV were equivalent. Our results indicated that desflurane might be an appropriate anesthetic during OLV for maintaining cerebral oxygenation with an effective equivalent to that of propofol.

Molecular Mechanism of Gas Anesthetics on the Invasion, Metastasis, and Chemosensitivity of Osteosarcoma Cells.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is one of the most prominent bone cancers which has a predominant occurrence in children and adolescents. This study is focused on determining the effects of treatment of gas anesthetics on invasion, metastasis, and chemosensitivity in the progression of osteosarcoma cells. Material and Methods. The biological effects of the common gas anesthetics-desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane-on osteosarcoma cells were studied and compared. The biological assays were performed for analysis of cell migration and proliferation. RESULTS: Isoflurane and sevoflurane have shown significant inhibition in the osteosarcoma cells at clinically relevant concentrations. Desflurane has shown less potent action on cell migration and inhibition. All three gas anesthetics have shown inhibition in cell proliferation. The effective antiproliferative action was at a clinically significant dose. At low millimolar concentrations, cell apoptosis was moderately affected. Drug combination analysis with chemotherapeutic drugs showed relevant inhibition in cell migration. All three agents showed significant augmentation of chemotherapeutic drugs in suppression and inhibition of inducing apoptosis. The antimigration action is likely to affect the PI3K/AKT pathway and IGF-1. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the proposed mechanisms of gas anesthetics and their differential effects on osteosarcoma cells and their survival, migration, growth, and chemosensitivity.

Activation of Orexinergic Neurons Inhibits the Anesthetic Effect of Desflurane on Consciousness State via Paraventricular Thalamic Nucleus in Rats.

BACKGROUND: Orexin, a neuropeptide derived from the perifornical area of the hypothalamus (PeFLH), promotes the recovery of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anesthesias, without influencing the induction time. However, whether the orexinergic system also plays a similar role in desflurane anesthesia, which is widely applied in clinical practice owing to its most rapid onset and offset time among all volatile anesthetics, has not yet been studied. In the present study, we explored the effect of the orexinergic system on the consciousness state induced by desflurane anesthesia. METHODS: The c-Fos staining was used to observe the activity changes of orexinergic neurons in the PeFLH and their efferent projection regions under desflurane anesthesia. Chemogenetic and optogenetic techniques were applied to compare the effect of PeFLH orexinergic neurons on the induction, emergence, and maintenance states between desflurane and isoflurane anesthesias. Orexinergic terminals in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT) were manipulated with pharmacologic, chemogenetic, and optogenetic techniques to assess the effect of orexinergic circuitry on desflurane anesthesia. RESULTS: Desflurane anesthesia inhibited the activity of orexinergic neurons in the PeFLH, as well as the neuronal activity in PVT, basal forebrain, dorsal raphe nucleus, and ventral tegmental area, as demonstrated by c-Fos staining. Activation of PeFLH orexinergic neurons prolonged the induction time and accelerated emergence from desflurane anesthesia but only influenced the emergence in isoflurane anesthesia, as demonstrated by chemogenetic and pharmacologic techniques. Meanwhile, optical activation of orexinergic neurons exhibited a long-lasting inhibitory effect on burst-suppression ratio (BSR) under desflurane anesthesia, and the effect may be contributed by the orexinergic PeFLH-PVT circuitry. The orexin-2 receptor (OX2R), but not orexin-1 receptor (OX1R), in the PVT, which had been inhibited most significantly by desflurane, mediated the proemergence effect of desflurane anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: We discovered, for the first time, that orexinergic neurons in the PeFLH could not only influence the maintenance and emergence from isoflurane and desflurane anesthesias but also affect the induction under desflurane anesthesia. Furthermore, this specific effect is probably mediated by orexinergic PeFLH-PVT circuitry, especially OX2Rs in the PVT.

Cognitive status of patients judged fit for discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia: a randomized comparison between desflurane and propofol.

BACKGROUND: The Aldrete's score is used to determine when a patient can safely leave the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and be transferred to the surgical ward. The Aldrete score is based on the evaluation of vital signs and consciousness. Cognitive functions according to the anaesthetic strategy at the time the patient is judged fit for discharge from the PACU (Aldrete's score ≥ 9) have not been previously studied. The aim of this trial was to assess the cognitive status of inpatients emerging either from desflurane or propofol anaesthesia, at the time of PACU discharge (Aldrete score ≥ 9). METHODS: Sixty adult patients scheduled for hip or knee arthroplasty under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either desflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Patients were evaluated the day before surgery using Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop Color Test and Verbal Learning Test. After surgery, the Aldrete score was checked every 5 min until reaching a score ≥ 9. At this time, the same battery of cognitive tests was applied. Each test was evaluated separately. Cognitive status was reported using a combined Z score pooling together the results of all 3 cognitive tests. RESULTS: Among the 3 tests, only DSST was significantly reduced at Aldrete Score ≥ 9 in the Desflurane group. Combined Z-scores at Aldrete Score ≥ 9 were (in medians [interquartils]): - 0.2 [- 1.2;+ 0.6] and - 0.4 [- 1.1;+ 0.4] for desflurane and propofol groups respectively (P = 0.62). Cognitive dysfunction at Aldrete score ≥ 9 was observed in 3 patients in the Propofol group and in 2 patients in the Desflurane group) (P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: No difference was observed in cognitive status at Aldrete score ≥ 9 between desflurane and propofol anaesthesia. Although approximately 10% of patients still had cognitive dysfunctions, an Aldrete score ≥ 9 was associated with satisfactory cognitive function recovery in the majority of the patients after lower limb arthroplasty surgery under general anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials identifier NTC02036736 .

Sevoflurane and Desflurane Exposure Enhanced Cell Proliferation and Migration in Ovarian Cancer Cells via miR-210 and miR-138 Downregulation.

Inhalational anaesthetics were previously reported to promote ovarian cancer malignancy, but underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aims to investigate the role of sevoflurane- or desflurane-induced microRNA (miRNA) changes on ovarian cancer cell behaviour. The cultured SKOV3 cells were exposed to 3.6% sevoflurane or 10.3% desflurane for 2 h. Expression of miR-138, -210 and -335 was determined with qRT-PCR. Cell proliferation and migration were assessed with wound healing assay, Ki67 staining and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay with or without mimic miR-138/-210 transfections. The miRNA downstream effector, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), was also analysed with immunofluorescent staining. Sevoflurane or desflurane exposure to cancer cells enhanced their proliferation and migration. miR-138 expression was suppressed by both sevoflurane and desflurane, while miR-210 expression was suppressed only by sevoflurane. miR-335 expression was not changed by either sevoflurane or desflurane exposure. The administration of mimic miR-138 or -210 reduced the promoting effects of sevoflurane and desflurane on cancer cell proliferation and migration, in line with the HIF-1α expression changes. These data indicated that inhalational agents sevoflurane and desflurane enhanced ovarian cancer cell malignancy via miRNA deactivation and HIF-1α. The translational value of this work needs further study.

Mechanistic consideration of the effect of perioperative volatile anesthetics on phagocytes.

A growing literature has shown that volatile anesthetics are promiscuous molecules targeting multiple molecules, some of which are critical for immunological functions. We focused on studies that delineated target molecules of volatile anesthetics on immune cells and summarized the effects of volatile anesthetics on immune functions. We also presented the perspectives of studying volatile anesthetics-mediated immunomodulation.

Remifentanil infusion during desflurane anesthesia reduces tissue blood flow while maintaining blood pressure and tissue oxygen tension in the masseter muscle and mandibular bone marrow.

The aim of this study was to compare changes in tissue blood flow and tissue oxygen tension in the masseter muscle and mandibular bone marrow induced by remifentanil under desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Eleven male tracheotomized Japan White rabbits were anesthetized with desflurane or sevoflurane under mechanical ventilation. The order of the inhalation of desflurane or sevoflurane was randomized. Desflurane or sevoflurane was administered at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration and remifentanil was infused at 0.4 µg/kg/min. Observed variables included heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), common carotid artery blood flow (CCBF), mandibular bone marrow tissue blood flow (BBF), masseter muscle tissue blood flow (MBF), mandibular bone marrow tissue oxygen tension (PbO2), and masseter muscle tissue oxygen tension (PmO2). Two way repeated measures ANOVA showed no interaction between volatile anesthetics and remifentanil infusion except for MBF. There were significant differences in HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and CCBF between desflurane and sevoflurane groups. There were also significant differences in HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, CCBF, BBF and PbO2 before, during and after remifentanil infusion. Desflurane reduced tissue blood flow in the masseter muscle and mandibular bone marrow while better maintained HR and BP than sevoflurane. Under remifentanil infusion, although both anesthetics reduced tissue blood flow, tissue oxygen tension was maintained in masseter muscle and mandibular bone marrow.

Comparison of vasodilatory properties between desflurane and sevoflurane using perfusion index: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The perfusion index (PI), calculated from the photoplethysmographic waveform, reflects peripheral vasomotor tone. As such, the PI serves as a surrogate for quantitative measures of drug-induced vasoconstriction or vasodilation. This study aimed to compare the effect on the PI of desflurane and sevoflurane at equi-anaesthetic concentrations in patients undergoing single-agent inhalation anaesthesia, where equi-anaesthetic dose was based on the known minimum alveolar concentration of these agents. METHODS: We randomly allocated patients scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery to receive either desflurane or sevoflurane general anaesthesia after target-controlled induction of anaesthesia with propofol. Anaesthesia was maintained at age-corrected minimum alveolar concentration 1.0, under neuromuscular block (rocuronium). The PI and haemodynamic data were recorded every minute for 35 min after induction of anaesthesia and after standardised nociceptive stimulation. The primary outcome was PI, compared between the groups over time (repeated-measures analysis of variance). Secondary outcomes included MAP and HR. RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants (mean [range] age: 42 yr [19-65 yr]; 49% females) were assigned to either desflurane (n=34) or sevoflurane (n=35). The PI remained higher under desflurane compared with sevoflurane, both before (mean difference [MD]: 3.3; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.0-4.7; P<0.001) and after tetanic stimulation (MD: 2.8; 95% CI: 2.0-3.7; P<0.001). Higher PI paralleled lower MAP in participants assigned to desflurane anaesthesia (P<0.001), both before (MD: 8 mm Hg; 95% CI: 4-12) and after nociceptive stimulation (MD: 14 mm Hg; 95% CI: 7-22). HR was similar throughout. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that at equipotent doses, desflurane exerts more potent vasodilatory properties and lowers blood pressure by a magnitude potentially associated with harm. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03570164.

[Short term olfactory memory and olfactory function after inhalation anesthetic agents: a randomized clinical trial]. / Memória olfativa de curta duração e função olfativa após anestésicos inalatórios: estudo clínico randomizado.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of two different inhalation anesthetic agents on postoperative olfactory memory and olfactory function in patients who underwent micro laryngeal surgery. METHODS: This randomized prospective controlled study consisted of 102 consecutive patients with a voice disorder. The patients underwent micro laryngeal surgery for voice disorders under general anesthesia. Patients who did not meet inclusion criteria and/or declined to participate (n=34) were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups. Four patients from Group 1 and four patients from Group 2 were lost to follow-up. Group 1 (n=30) received sevoflurane, and Group 2 (n=30) received desflurane during anesthesia. We compared the results by performing the pre-op and post-op Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Olfactory test. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (55%) were male and 27 (45%) were female. The mean age was 48.18±13.88 years (range: 19-70 years). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory functions did not show a significant difference within the groups postoperatively (p> 0.05). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory memory showed a significant decrease 3hours after the surgery (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory functions and memory were not affected by desflurane in the early postoperative period. Although sevoflurane did not affect olfactory functions, it had a temporary negative effect on olfactory memory in the early postoperative period.

Titration of sevoflurane anesthesia to optimize the time to regain airway reflexes in patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Desflurane has adverse environmental effects, but has clinical advantages to speed emergence and return of protective airway reflexes compared with sevoflurane. We hypothesized that weaning of the inspired sevoflurane during the final 15 minutes of surgery would eliminate differences in airway reflex recovery between these agents. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval and informed consent, 40 patients undergoing elective surgery (≥1-hour) randomly received desflurane or sevoflurane. Patients swallowed 20 mL of water without drooling or coughing, and then received sedation and PONV pre-medication. Anesthesia was induced using propofol and fentanyl and maintained with desflurane or sevoflurane through a laryngeal mask airway maintaining a bispectral index of 45-50 and 50-60 during the final 15 minutes before surgery end. Cardiorespiratory variables and age-adjusted minimal alveolar concentration were recorded. The duration between anesthetic discontinuation and first appropriate response to command was measured; the laryngeal mask airway was removed. Two minutes after responding to command, patients were positioned semi-upright and attempted to swallow water. If successful swallowing was not achieved, the test was repeated every 4 minutes after each failure until successful swallowing was achieved. RESULTS: Average anesthetic concentration and bispectral index was similar in patients receiving desflurane vs sevoflurane. Response times after discontinuation of anesthetics were similar. There were no differences in the recovery of swallowing ability between desflurane and sevoflurane groups. CONCLUSION: Weaning of sevoflurane during the final 15 minutes of surgery eliminates clinical advantages of the more rapid return of airway reflexes with desflurane.

Short term olfactory memory and olfactory function after inhalation anesthetic agents: a randomized clinical trial / Memória olfativa de curta duração e função olfativa após anestésicos inalatórios: estudo clínico randomizado

Abstract Background and objectives: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of two different inhalation anesthetic agents on postoperative olfactory memory and olfactory function in patients who underwent micro laryngeal surgery. Methods: This randomized prospective controlled study consisted of 102 consecutive patients with a voice disorder. The patients underwent micro laryngeal surgery for voice disorders under general anesthesia. Patients who did not meet inclusion criteria and/or declined to participate (n = 34) were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups. Four patients from Group 1 and four patients from Group 2 were lost to follow-up. Group 1 (n = 30) received sevoflurane, and Group 2 (n = 30) received desflurane during anesthesia. We compared the results by performing the pre-op and post-op Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Olfactory test. Results: Thirty-three patients (55%) were male and 27 (45%) were female. The mean age was 48.18 ± 13.88 years (range: 19‒70 years). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory functions did not show a significant difference within the groups postoperatively (p > 0.05). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory memory showed a significant decrease 3 hours after the surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Olfactory functions and memory were not affected by desflurane in the early postoperative period. Although sevoflurane did not affect olfactory functions, it had a temporary negative effect on olfactory memory in the early postoperative period.

Resumo Introdução e objetivos: O estudo avaliou o efeito pós-operatório de dois agentes anestésicos inalatórios distintos na memória olfativa de curta duração e na função olfativa em pacientes submetidos à microcirurgia de laringe. Método: O estudo prospectivo controlado randomizado avaliou, consecutivamente, 102 pacientes com alteração vocal submetidos à microcirurgia de laringe sob anestesia geral. Trinta e quatro pacientes não obedeceram aos critérios de inclusão e/ou não aceitaram participar do estudo e foram excluídos. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos. Quatro pacientes do Grupo 1 e quatro do Grupo 2 foram perdidos durante o seguimento. O Grupo 1 (n = 30) recebeu sevoflurano durante a anestesia e o Grupo 2 (n = 30), desflurano. Comparamos resultados pré e pós-operatórios de memória olfativa e funções olfativas, realizando o Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Olfactory test. Resultados: Foram incluídos um total de 33 (55%) homens e 27 (45%) mulheres. A idade média foi 48,18 ± 13,88 anos (variação: 19-70 anos). As funções olfativas pré e pós-operatórias não apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significante dentro dos grupos no pós-operatório (p > 0,05). A memória olfativa pré e pós-operatória não mostrou diminuição estatisticamente significante quando avaliada três horas após a cirurgia (p< 0,05). Conclusões: Memória e funções olfativas não foram alteradas pelo desflurano no pós-operatório imediato. Embora o sevoflurano não tenha alterado as funções olfativas, causou efeito temporário negativo na memória olfativa no pós-operatório imediato.

Effects of different concentrations of desflurane on the index of cardiac electrophysiological balance in gynecologic surgery patients.

The objectives were to observe the effects of different concentrations of desflurane on QT, QTc, Tp-e, Tp-e/QT, and the index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB). Sixty patients were randomly divided into group D1, group D2, and group D3 by using a random number table, 20 in each group. After entering the operating room, patients received 10 mL/kg hydroxyethyl starch, 0.1 mg/kg midazolam, 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium, 3 µg/kg fentanyl, and 0.3 mg/kg etomidate intravenously and then accepted intubation and mechanical ventilation. The desflurane evaporator was opened. The concentrations of desflurane in the D1, D2, and D3 groups were maintained at 0.6, 1.3, and 2.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), respectively. Twelve-lead ECGs were recorded at time before induction (T1) and at 20 min after desflurane reached the required concentration (T2). HR and MAP were recorded measure and the QT interval, QTc interval, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and iCEB were calculated. Compared with before inhalation (T1), the QTc interval was prolonged in the D1, D2, and D3 groups after inhalation of different concentrations of desflurane for 20 min (T2) (P < 0.05) and the Tp-e/QT ratio decreased in the D1 and D2 groups at T2 (P < 0.05). Compared with the D1 and D2 groups, the Tp-e/QT ratio of the D3 group increased at T2 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Tp-e interval and iCEB at any time (P > 0.05). The study suggested that inhalation of desflurane at a normal concentration cannot cause arrhythmogenic characteristics and affect the cardiac electrophysiological stability.

Effects of Volatile Anesthetics on Proliferation and Viability of SW480 Colon Cancer Cells In Vitro.

BACKGROUND/AIM: For patients undergoing cancer surgery, the risk for cancer progression is enhanced during the perioperative period. To what extent the type of anesthetic can affect the metastatic process and finally the outcome of patients with cancer is under debate. For this reason, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the volatile anesthetics sevoflurane and desflurane on colon cancer cells in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SW480 colon carcinoma cells were exposed for 3 or 6 h to sevoflurane (1 or 2.5 vol%) or desflurane (6 or 12 vol%). Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry after a 24-72 h recovery and apoptosis was detected by annexin V staining after a 0-48 h recovery. Viability was tested by measuring ATP content after 0 and 24 h recovery. RESULTS: Treatment with sevoflurane or desflurane caused no or only slight changes in cell-cycle distribution and apoptosis rate. Desflurane at 12vol% significantly reduced cell viability by 17±25% and 11±22% after 3 and 6 h incubation and 24 h recovery, respectively, while 2.5 vol% sevoflurane slightly increased viability. CONCLUSION: At clinically relevant concentrations, sevoflurane and desflurane had only slight effects on SW480 colon cancer cells in vitro.

Effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on respiratory functions following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia with intravenous or inhalation anesthetics reduces respiratory functions. We investigated the effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on postoperative respiratory function tests. METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled study was performed in a university hospital from October 2015 to February 2017. Ninety patients scheduled for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were randomly categorized into either of these three groups: propofol (n = 30, the Group TIVA), desflurane (n = 30, the Group D) or sevoflurane (n = 30, the Group S). We analyzed the patients before, after, and 24 h following surgery, to identify the following parameters: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) %, forced vital capacity (FVC) %, FEV1/FVC, and arterial blood gases (ABG). Furthermore, we also recorded the intraoperative dynamic lung compliance and airway resistance values. RESULTS: We did not find any significant differences in FEV1 values (primary outcome) among the groups (P = 0.336). There was a remarkable reduction in the FEV1 and FVC values in all groups postoperatively relative to the baseline (P < 0.001). The FVC, FEV1/FVC, ABG analysis, compliance, and airway resistance were similar among the groups. Intraoperative dynamic compliance values were lower at the 1st and 2nd hours than those immediately after intubation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane reduced FEV1 and FVC values postoperatively, without any significant differences among the drugs.

DNA damage effects of inhalation anesthetics in human bronchoalveolar cells.

BACKGROUND: The main objective was to evaluate and compare the local genotoxicity of sevoflurane and desflurane in bronchoalveolar cells, while the secondary outcome was to detect systemic oxidative DNA damage. To our knowledge, our study is the first one to evaluate the local effects of inhalation anesthetics in human bronchoalveolar cells in patients. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists group I-II patients scheduled for lumbar discectomy surgery were enrolled in this randomized prospective study. Patients were randomized to sevoflurane or desflurane for anesthesia maintenance. Bronchoalveolar lavage samples and peripheral blood samples were taken at 2-time points: the first point (baseline, T1); and the second point (postexposure, T2). Final number of 48 samples were the sevoflurane (n = 22) and desflurane (n = 26) groups. Comet assay was applied to examine genotoxic properties. Oxidative DNA damage in plasma was measured with 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). RESULTS: T2 values were higher than baseline values in both the desflurane group (tail-length: 66 ±â€Š24, %DNA in tail: 72 ±â€Š60, tail moment: 47.52 ±â€Š14.4; P = .001, P = .005, P = .001, respectively) and the sevoflurane group (tail-length: 58 ±â€Š33, %DNA in tail: 88 ±â€Š80, tail moment: 51.04 ±â€Š26.4; P = .001, P = .012, P = .001, respectively). T2 plasma 8-OHdG levels were also higher than baseline levels in the desflurane group (3.91 ±â€Š0.19 ng/ml vs 1.32 ±â€Š0.20 ng/ml, P = .001) and sevoflurane group (3.98 ±â€Š0.18 ng/ml vs 1.31 ±â€Š0.11 ng/ml, P = .001). There were no differences between the 2 groups in comet parameters and 8-OHdG levels. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that both inhalation agents cause DNA damage in the bronchoalveolar cells. Also, we detected increases in plasma 8-OHdG concentrations. Local genotoxicity and systemic oxidized DNA damage were similar in both groups.

The effects of Desflurane and Sevoflurane on Nesfatin-1 levels in laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Nesfatin-1 is involved in cardiovascular regulation, stress-related responses. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of volatile anesthetics on Nesfatin-1 levels. METHOD: Fourty-two patients aged 30-65 years with the American Society Anesthesiology (ASA) Class I-II who were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study Patients were randomized into two group; desflurane administered group (Group I, n = 21) and sevoflurane administered group (Group II, n = 21). For anesthesia maintenance, the patients received 6% desflurane or 2% sevoflurane in 40% O2 and 60% air. The patient's heart rate (HR), mean, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures (MAP, SAP, DAP), peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2) were monitored and recorded before induction, after induction, after intubation, and during extubation. Blood samples were collected before induction (T1), and after extubation when aldrete score was 10 (T2). RESULTS: Demographic data were similar between the groups. The preoperative levels of nesfatin were similar in the two groups (p = 0.715). In desflurane group, post-operative nesfatin levels were similar compared to preoperative levels (p = 0.073). In sevoflurane group, post-operative nesfatin levels were similar (p = 0.131). The nesfatin levels (postoperative vs preoperative) were similar between the groups (p = 0.900). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study results suggest that nesfatin-1 levels are not affected by the use of sevoflurane or desflurane in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617001023347 , retrospectively registered on 17 July 2017.