Examination of the Odor-Eliminating Effect of a Deodorizing Spray on the Volatile Odorants of Malignant Wounds.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the odor components before and after spraying a deodorizing spray (DS) on volatile odorants in malignant wounds (MWs) in women with breast cancer; a secondary aim was to evaluate the deodorizing effect of the DS. DESIGN: This is an observational study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: We investigated 3 patients who had MWs resulting from breast cancer. Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics in the Breast Surgery Department, University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. METHODS: The target material was exudate-containing dressings collected from MWs. After collection, the odor components (air) were collected into a sampling bag by using a handheld pump. Then, after 5 sprays of a DS, air was collected in the same manner. All odor components were analyzed objectively by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-olfactometry (GC/MS-O). The concentration in parts per million (ppm) of the main odor components in the air before and after spraying DS was compared, and the residual concentration rate (%) was calculated. Sniffing tests before and after spraying were also conducted to determine the subjective deodorizing effect of DS. RESULTS: Of the possible hundreds of volatile odorants, 3 to 11 main components of volatile odorants were detected per subject. After DS spraying, the odorants dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl trisulfide, and benzyl alcohol were reduced according to GC/MS-O. The residual concentration of the following main odor components was also reduced: benzyl alcohol (30%), octanal (56%), p-dichlorobenzene (56%), isovaleric acid (56%), propylene glycol (63%), and nonanal (66%). CONCLUSIONS: DS was effective against some volatile odorants in MWs, but no clear deodorizing effect was observed. Since there are individual differences in the type and number of odorants in MWs, the use of DS needs to be examined and verified in a larger number of cases.

Deodorizing Substance in Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) Seed Oil.

A deodorizing substance in black cumin (Nigella sativa L.), a spice for curry and vegetable foods in Southwest Asia, was examined. The essential oil prepared from the seeds of this plant exhibited strong deodorizing activity against methyl mercaptan, which is a main factor in oral malodor. After purification with silica gel column chromatography, the active substance in black cumin seed oil was identified as thymoquinone. This monoterpenic quinone functions as the main deodorizing substance in this oil against methyl mercaptan. Metabolite analysis suggested that the deodorizing activity may be generated by the addition of a reactive quinone molecule to methyl mercaptan. In the present study, the menthane-type quinone and phenol derivatives exhibited deodorizing activities via this mechanism.

Sources, concentrations, and risks of naphthalene in indoor and outdoor air.

UNLABELLED: Naphthalene is a ubiquitous pollutant, and very high concentrations are sometimes encountered indoors when this chemical is used as a pest repellent or deodorant. This study describes the distribution and sources of vapor-phase naphthalene concentrations in four communities in southeast Michigan, USA. Outdoors, naphthalene was measured in the communities and at a near-road site. Indoors, naphthalene levels were characterized in 288 suburban and urban homes. The median outdoor concentration was 0.15 µg/m(3), and a modest contribution from rush-hour traffic was noted. The median indoor long-term concentration was 0.89 µg/m(3), but concentrations were extremely skewed and 14% of homes exceeded 3 µg/m(3), the chronic reference concentration for non-cancer effects, 8% exceeded 10 µg/m(3), and levels reached 200 µg/m(3). The typical excess individual lifetime cancer risk was about 10(-4) and reached 10(-2) in some homes. Important sources include naphthalene's use as a pest repellent and deodorant, migration from attached garages and, to lesser extents, cigarette smoke and vehicle emissions. Excessive use as a repellent caused the highest concentrations. Naphthalene presents high risks in a subset of homes, and policies and actions to reduce exposures, for example, sales bans or restrictions, improved labeling, and consumer education, should be considered. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Long-term average concentrations of naphthalene in most homes fell into the 0.2-1.7 µg/m(3) range reported as representative in earlier studies. The highly skewed distribution of concentrations results in a subset of homes with elevated concentrations and health risks that greatly exceed US EPA and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The most important indoor source is the use of naphthalene as a pest repellant or deodorant; secondary sources include presence of an attached garage, cigarette smoking, and outdoor sources. House-to-house variation was large, reflecting differences among the residences and naphthalene use practices. Stronger policies and educational efforts are needed to eliminate or modify indoor usage practices of this chemical.

A comparative human health risk assessment of p-dichlorobenzene-based toilet rimblock products versus fragrance/surfactant-based alternatives.

A comparison of the human health risk to consumers using one of two types of toilet rimblock products, either a p-dichlorobenzene-based rimblock or two newer fragrance/surfactant-based alternatives, was conducted. Rimblock products are designed for global use by consumers worldwide and function by releasing volatile compounds into indoor air with subsequent exposure presumed to be mainly by inhalation of indoor air. Using the THERdbASE exposure model and experimentally determined emission data, indoor air concentrations and daily intake values were determined for both types of rimblock products. Modeled exposure concentrations from a representative p-dichlorobenzene rimblock product are an order of magnitude higher than those from the alternative rimblock products due to its nearly pure composition and high sublimation rate. Lifetime exposure to p-dichlorobenzene or the subset of fragrance components with available RfD values is not expected to lead to non-cancer-based adverse health effects based on the exposure concentrations estimated using the THERdbASE model. A similar comparison of cancer-based effects was not possible as insufficient data were available for the fragrance components.