Long-term outcomes of nasogastric tube with Gastrografin for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: We had previously reported that the administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) followed by long tube (LT) strategy could be a novel standard treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO); however, the long-term outcomes after initial improvement remain unknown. This study aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of first-line NGT-G. METHODS: Enrolled patients with ASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018. Thereafter, the cumulative surgery rate, cumulative recurrence rate, and overall survival (OS) rate were analyzed. In addition, subset analysis was conducted to determine the cumulative recurrence rate according to colonic contrast with Gastrografin at 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (LT group, n = 111; NGT-G group, n = 112) were analyzed over a median follow-up duration of 550 days. The cumulative 1-year surgery rates, cumulative 1-year recurrence rates, and 1-year OS rates in the LT and NGT-G groups were 18.8% and 18.1%, 30.0% and 31.7%, and 99.1% and 96.6%, respectively; no significant differences were observed between both groups. In the NGT-G group, a negative colonic contrast at 24 h demonstrated a higher tendency for future recurrence compared with a positive colonic contrast at 24 h (1-year recurrence rate: negative contrast, 46.9% vs positive contrast, 27.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube followed by LT can be a promising treatment strategy for ASBO, with long-term efficacies equivalent to initial LT placement.

Timing of Gastrografin administration in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): Does it matter?

BACKGROUND: Gastrografin challenge is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool to predict patients who may benefit from nonoperative management in adhesive small bowel obstruction. This study explores the optimal timing of Gastrografin in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction by comparing early versus late Gastrografin challenge. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from January 2016 to January 2018 identified patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction who underwent Gastrografin challenge. A receiver operating characteristic curve, to predict a duration of stay less than 5 days, calculated a 12-hour limit which separated early and late groups. Nonoperative and operative patients were compared separately. Our primary outcome was duration of stay. Secondary outcomes included operative requirement, time to the operating room, complication rate, and 1-year mortality. In a separate analysis, multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors for 1-year mortality. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients were identified (58 early, 76 late). In nonoperative patients, the early group had a shorter duration of stay (3.2 days vs 5.4 days), fewer complications, and a lower complication and 1-year mortality rate (P < .05). In operative patients, the early group had a shorter preoperative duration of stay (1.8 days vs 3.9 days) (P < .05). On multivariable regression, congestive heart failure, any postoperative complication, and operative requirement were the best predictors of 1-year mortality (R2 = 0.321; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Gastrografin administration within 12 hours of adhesive small bowel obstruction diagnosis had favorable outcomes in terms of duration of stay, complications, and mortality in nonoperative patients. Moreover, in operative patients, preoperative duration of stay was shortened. Our findings suggest protocolizing early Gastrografin challenge may be an important principle in adhesive small bowel obstruction management.

The first management using intubation of a nasogastric tube with Gastrografin enterography or long tube for non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal decompression is generally applied to a non-strangulated acute small bowel obstruction (NSASBO). Although long tube (LT) placement and administration of Gastrografin through a nasogastric tube (NGT-G) have shown advantages over NGT alone in previous studies, no studies appear to have compared LT and NGT-G. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with NSASBO were randomly assigned to receive LT or NGT-G between July 2016 and November 2018 at 11 Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of NGT-G compared to LT for non-surgery rate, and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the non-surgery rate (-15%) was set as the lower margin for inferiority of NGT-G compared to LT. RESULTS: In total, 223 patients (LT group, n = 111; NGT-G group, n = 112) were analyzed in the present trial. The non-surgery rate was 87.4% in the LT group and 91.1% in the NGT-G group, with a 3.7% difference between NGT-G and LT (95.3%CI - 5.55 to 12.91; non-inferiority P = 0.00002923). On the other hand, the non-surgery rate with pure NGT-G alone (76.8%) that represents non-cross-over NGT-G without subsequent LT was significantly lower than that with LT (P = 0.039). Median procedure time was significantly shorter with NGT-G (1 min) than with LT (25 min; P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences in mortality or hospital stay were noted between groups. CONCLUSION: NGT-G is an effective alternative to LT as a first-line treatment for NSASBO. A sequential strategy comprising NGT-G followed by LT might offer a new standard for NSASBO. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (umin.ac.jp/ctr Identifier: UMIN000022669) prior to the start of this trial.

Optimal Timing of First Abdominal Radiography after Gastrografin Administration for Small Bowel Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Water-soluble contrast agent (WSCA) administration is commonly used to evaluate adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) either via a challenge or follow-through study. This analysis aimed to determine optimal timing to first abdominal radiograph after WSCA administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post hoc review of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma SBO database was used to compare data from two institutions using different methodologies, either the small bowel follow through method or the challenge method, from March 2015-January 2018. The primary outcome was timing of contrast into the colon. Outcomes were also analyzed. A multivariate regression analysis controlled for age, sex, body mass index, previous SBO admissions, and abdominal surgeries. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (A, 119; B, 117). There were minor demographic differences between cohorts and no significant differences between institutions regarding the confirmed presence of WSCA in the colon, rates of operative intervention, length of operation, hospital length of stay, or 30-d readmission rates.Institution A, where the challenge method was practiced, had 95 (80%) patients with contrast to colon overall; four of 95 (4%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon at or before 7 h, and 89 of 95 (94%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon between 7.1 and 10 h. Institution B, where the small bowel follow through method was practiced, had 94 (80%) patients with contrast to colon overall; 73 of 94 (78%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon at or before 7 h, and 15 of 94 (16%) patients had confirmed contrast to colon between 7.1 and 10 h. CONCLUSIONS: Either method is effective for evaluation of SBO. Adding a radiograph at 4 h is feasible, could promote earlier disposition, be conducted as part of an emergency department protocol, and possibly allow for the selection of patients who are candidates for outpatient treatment.

Efficacy of small-volume gastrografin videofluoroscopic screening for detecting pharyngeal leaks following total laryngectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Pharyngocutaneous fistulae are dreaded complications following total laryngectomy. This paper presents our experience using 3-5 ml gastrografin to detect pharyngeal leaks following total laryngectomy, and compares post-operative videofluoroscopy with clinical follow-up findings in the detection of pharyngocutaneous fistulae. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted of total laryngectomy patients. The control group (n = 85) was assessed clinically for development of pharyngocutaneous fistulae, while the study group (n = 52) underwent small-volume (3-5 ml) post-operative gastrografin videofluoroscopy. RESULTS: In the control group, 24 of 85 patients (28 per cent) developed pharyngocutaneous fistulae, with 6 requiring surgical correction. In the study group, 24 of 52 patients (46 per cent) had videofluoroscopy-detected pharyngeal leaks; 4 patients (8 per cent) developed pharyngocutaneous fistulae, but all cases resolved following non-surgical management. Patients who underwent videofluoroscopy had a significantly lower risk of developing pharyngocutaneous fistulae; sensitivity and specificity in the detection of pharyngocutaneous fistulae were 58 per cent and 100 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Small-volume gastrografin videofluoroscopy reliably identified small pharyngeal leaks. Routine use in total laryngectomy combined with withholding feeds in cases of early leaks may prevent the development of pharyngocutaneous fistulae.

Evaluation of a water-soluble contrast protocol for small bowel obstruction: A southwestern surgical congress multicenter trial.

Differentiation between SBO that will resolve with supportive measures and those requiring surgery remains challenging. WSC administration may be diagnostic and therapeutic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use of a SBO protocol using WSC challenge. A protocol was implemented at five tertiary care centers. Demographics, prior surgical history, time to operation, complications, and LOS were analyzed. 283 patients were admitted with SBO; 13% underwent immediate laparotomy; these patients had a median LOS of 7.5 days. The remaining 245 were candidates for WSC challenge. Of those, 80% received contrast. 139 (71%) had contrast passage to the colon. LOS in these patients was 4 days. Sixty-five patients (29%) failed contrast passage within 24 h and underwent surgery. LOS was 9 days. 8% of patients in whom contrast passage was observed at 24 h nevertheless subsequently underwent surgery. 4% of patients who failed WSC challenge did not proceed to surgery. Our multicenter trial revealed that implementation of a WSC protocol may facilitate early recognition of partial from complete obstruction.

Resolution of adhesive small bowel obstruction with a protocol based on Gastrografin administration.

The use of Gastrografin may have a therapeutic effect on resolving adhesive small bowel obstruction. Adhesive Small Bowel obstruction (ASBO) accounts for the majority of patients with small bowel obstruction. Most patients are managed conservatively; frequent admissions create a considerable burden. We sought to examine the adherence to the Bologna guidelines for the management of ASBO in a high volume tertiary center and whether or not Gastrografin had a therapeutic effect. A comparison was made between an initial retrospective audit looking at ASBO and a prospective re-audit after applying standards derived from the Bologna guidelines. During re-audit it was found that more patients underwent conservative management and fewer patients had surgery as first line management. In the re-audit, those who had to undergo surgery within/after a period of 72h of conservative management were also fewer. Whether they were managed surgically primarily or after a period of conservative management, the average length of stay was also shorter. In comparison to the preliminary audit, there appeared to be no change in the way that medical history and physical examination was documented during the re-audit. However, there was a marked difference in the use of appropriate blood tests and CT scans. Changes were made successfully following the initial audit results and have been implemented, thus closing the audit loop. This study shows that the use of Gastrografin has decreased the need for surgical intervention in a group of patients with small bowel obstruction.

Computed tomography colonography: Retrospective comparison of laxative plus barium tagging versus iodinated contrast only for bowel preparation and faecal tagging.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus as to the most optimal bowel preparation regime for Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC). Concerns regarding laxative bowel preparation (LBP) include tolerability, adverse effects and complexity of regimen. Two hospitals in Auckland changed CTC bowel preparation from standard LBP to Gastrografin (GG) in 2015. The aim of this study is to retrospectively assess objective and subjective quality measures of these different bowel preparations. METHODS: Two study groups were selected retrospectively from patients who underwent CTC at two hospitals in September-October 2013 (LBP) and September- October 2015 (GG). Each study group comprised 60 patients (30 consecutive patients from each hospital). Patients were randomized and anonymized to reduce bias in analysis. Study patients were assessed independently by three experienced Radiologists using a simple grading system derived from the literature. RESULTS: There was significantly less faecal residue (P = 0.006) and better faecal tagging (P = 0.001) in the right colon in the GG group. There was significantly higher fluid residue in the GG group than the LBP group (P = 0.0001), particularly in the right colon, with better fluid tagging in the GG group(P ≤ 0.0001). Higher Hounsfield Units of residual fluid were observed in the GG group (P ≤ 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjective quality scores (P = 0.219), between the two preparations. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated better faecal cleansing and faecal tagging in the GG group. Higher fluid residue in the GG group was offset by better fluid tagging.

The Novel X-Ray Visible Zein-Based Non-adhesive Precipitating Liquid Embolic HEIE1_2017: An Exploratory Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the novel zein-based non-adhesive precipitating liquid embolic HEIE1_2017. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zein-based liquid embolics are an own class of embolization material. In this study, HEIE1_2017, a novel zein-based liquid embolic, was investigated. Visibility was assessed in vitro in CT and MRI phantoms, embolization characteristics were assessed in vivo in the kidneys of 12 pigs. Components of HEIE1_2017 were zein as occlusion material, ethanol as solvent, and iodized oil as radiopaque material. HEIE1_2017 was used in pure (HEI-PURE) and manually modified (HEI-MOD) form and compared with 6% ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH). Different radiological methods (CT, MRI, DSA, cone-beam CT, and micro-CT) and histopathologic analyses were applied to compare visibility and vascular occlusion patterns. RESULTS: In CT phantoms, all embolics were definitely visible as hyperdense materials. In MRI phantoms, signal-to-noise ratio was highest for HEI-PURE, followed by HEI-MOD and EVOH. In all kidneys, embolization procedures were technically successful and without complications. In DSA, all embolics were definitely visible during and after embolization. Only EVOH caused substantial artifacts in cone-beam CT and CT. In micro-CT and histopathology, HEI-PURE showed a homogeneous occlusion from segmental arteries to glomerular capillaries. HEI-MOD demonstrated the deepest vascular penetration (up to the level of peritubular capillaries), but with an inhomogeneous distribution. For EVOH, there was inhomogeneous vascular occlusion from segmental arteries to glomerular capillaries. CONCLUSION: HEIE1_2017 is a promising novel zein-based liquid embolic. Further preclinical and clinical studies with higher case numbers and long-term follow-up are needed to further assess the value of this embolic material.

A Significant Proportion of Small Bowel Obstructions Require >48 Hours to Resolve After Gastrografin.

BACKGROUND: Gastrografin (GG)-based nonoperative approach is both diagnostic and therapeutic for partial small bowel obstruction (SBO). Absence of X-ray evidence of GG in the colon after 8 h is predictive of the need for operation, and a recent trial used 48 h to prompt operation. We hypothesize that a significant number of patients receiving the GG challenge require >48 h before an effect is seen. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional SBO database was performed including only those receiving GG challenge. Successful nonoperative management (NOM) was defined as passage of flatus or nasogastric tube (NGT) removal. NOM was considered a failure if operative intervention was required. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of delayed (>48 h) GG challenge effect and expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of 286 patients receiving GG, 208 patients (73%) were successfully managed nonoperatively. A total of 60 (29%) NOM patients had NGT decompression for >48 h (n = 54) or required >48 h to pass flatus (n = 34), with some requiring both (n = 28). Prior abdominal operations and SBO admission were protective of delayed GG effect (0.411 [0.169-1.00], P < 0.05; 0.478 [0.240-0.952], P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients at 48 h (29%) "failed" the GG challenge as they had yet to pass flatus or still required NGT but were nonetheless successfully managed nonoperatively. Extending the GG challenge beyond 48 h may help avoid unnecessary operations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

[Gastrografin as a prognostic and therapeutic medium; use for small bowel obstruction, but not for closed loop obstruction]. / Gastrografin als prognostisch en therapeutisch medium.

Timely recognition and treatment of small bowel obstruction is of great importance for the course of the disease. Complete obstruction of the small bowel can lead to serious complications such as bowel ischaemia and perforation. Gastrografin, which is traditionally used as an oral contrast agent in imaging diagnostics, is of prognostic and therapeutic value in patients presenting with adhesive small bowel obstruction. CT is necessary to rule out closed loop obstruction or other than adhesive causes of the bowel obstruction before using Gastrografin. Patients with closed loop obstruction can rapidly develop bowel ischaemia and immediate surgery is indicated once diagnosed. Awaiting clinical resolution of the small bowel obstruction without surgery is justified when closed loop obstruction has been ruled out, there are no signs of bowel ischaemia and an abdominal radiograph within 4-24 hours after administration of Gastrografin shows the oral contrast in the colon.

Deconstructing dogma: Nonoperative management of small bowel obstruction in the virgin abdomen.

BACKGROUND: Management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) has become more conservative, especially in those patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). However, surgical dogma continues to recommend operative exploration for SBO with no PAS. With the increased use of computed tomography imaging resulting in more SBO diagnoses, it is important to reevaluate the role of mandatory operative exploration. Gastrografin (GG) administration decreases the need for operative exploration and may be an option for SBO without PAS. We hypothesized that the use of GG for SBO without PAS will be equally effective in reducing the operative exploration rate compared with that for SBO with PAS. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for patients with SBO from February 2015 through December 2016. Patients younger than 18 years, pregnant patients, and patients with evidence of hypotension, bowel strangulation, peritonitis, closed loop obstruction or pneumatosis intestinalis were excluded. The primary outcome was operative exploration rate for SBO with or without PAS. Rate adjustment was accomplished through multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 601 patients with SBO were included in the study, 500 with PAS and 101 patients without PAS. The two groups were similar except for age, sex, prior abdominal surgery including colon surgery, prior SBO admission, and history of cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that PAS (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; p = 0.03) and the use of GG (OR, 0.11; p < 0.01) were independent predictors of successful nonoperative management, whereas intensive care unit admission (OR, 16.0; p < 0.01) was associated with a higher likelihood of need for operation. The use of GG significantly decreased the need for operation in patients with and without PAS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with and without PAS who received GG had lower rates of operative exploration for SBO compared with those who did not receive GG. Patients with a diagnosis of SBO without PAS should be considered for the nonoperative management approach using GG. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Introduction of Meglumine Diatrizoate into the Middle Cranial Fossa: A Rare Fatal Complication of Temporomandibular Joint Arthrography.

The authors here report a rare fatal complication of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrography. A 57-year-old woman suddenly exhibited spasm and dizziness during TMJ arthrography. A multislice CT scanning of head demonstrated a defect in the roof of the glenoid fossa and unanticipated introduction of meglumine diatrizoate into the middle cranial fossa, which should account for neurotoxic symptoms of the patient and could be fatal if not appropriately treated in time. As TMJ puncture is widely performed in clinical practice and generally considered a safe technique, this case might serve as a reminder of the potential risk of the anatomical variation-a defect in the roof of the glenoid fossa-to TMJ clinical practitioners.

Oral water soluble contrast for malignant bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common problem in patients with intra-abdominal cancer. Oral water soluble contrast (OWSC) has been shown to be useful in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction in identifying patients who will recover with conservative management alone and also in reducing the length of hospital stay. It is not clear whether the benefits of OWSC in adhesive small bowel obstruction are also seen in patients with MBO. OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of OWSC media and follow-up abdominal radiographs in predicting the success of conservative treatment in resolving inoperable MBO with conservative management.To determine the efficacy and safety of OWSC media in reducing the duration of obstruction and reducing hospital stay in people with MBO. SEARCH METHODS: We identified studies from searching Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and MEDLINE in Process, Embase, CINAHL, Science Citation Index (Web of Science) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (Web of Science). We also searched registries of clinical trials and the CareSearch Grey Literature database. The date of the search was the 6 June 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or prospective controlled studies, that evaluated the diagnostic potential of OWSC in predicting which malignant bowel obstructions will resolve with conservative treatment.RCTs, or prospective controlled studies, that assessed the therapeutic potential of OWSC in managing MBO at any level compared with placebo, no intervention or usual treatment or supportive care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias and assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. MAIN RESULTS: We found only one RCT meeting the selection criteria for the second objective (therapeutic potential) of this review. This study recruited nine participants. It compared the use of gastrografin versus placebo in adult patients with MBO with no indication for further intervention (surgery, endoscopy) apart from standardised conservative management.The overall risk of bias for the study was high due to issues with low numbers of participants, selective reporting of outcomes and a high attrition rate for the intervention arm.Primary outcomesThe included trial was a pilot study whose primary outcome was to test the feasibility for a large study. The authors reported specifically on the number of patients screened, the number recruited and reasons for exclusion; this was not the focus of our review.Due to the low number of participants, the authors of the study decided not to report on our primary outcome of assessing the ability of OWSC to predict the likelihood of malignant small bowel obstruction resolving with conservative treatment alone (diagnostic effect). It also did not report on our primary outcome of rate of resolution of MBO in patients receiving OWSC compared with those not receiving it (therapeutic effect).The study reported that no issues regarding safety or tolerability of either gastrografin or placebo were identified. The overall quality of the evidence for the incidence of adverse events with OWSC was very low, downgraded twice for serious limitations to study quality (high risk of selective reporting and attrition bias) and downgraded once for imprecision (sparse data).Secondary outcomesThe study planned to report on this review's secondary outcome measures of length of hospital stay and time from administration of OWSC to resolution of MBO. However the authors of the study decided not to do so due to the low numbers of patients recruited. The study did not report on our secondary outcome measure of survival times from onset of inoperable MBO until death. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from RCTs to determine the place of OWSC in predicting which patients with inoperable MBO will respond with conservative treatment alone. There is also insufficient evidence from RCTs to determine the therapeutic effects and safety of OWSC in patients with malignant small bowel obstruction.

Usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET)/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in discriminating between malignant and benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET)/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in discriminating between malignant and benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). METHODS: PET/CE-CT imaging was conducted on 29 IPMN lesions, which subsequently underwent surgery. Preoperative findings on PET/CE-CT imaging were compared with the histological findings of the resected specimens to determine the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CE-CT imaging for evaluation of the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant IPMNs. RESULTS: The final diagnoses of the 29 IPMN lesions were 9 benign and 20 malignant. Overall, 18 of the 20 malignant cases were positive for FDG uptake, while 7 of 9 benign cases were negative. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for benign/malignant differentiation using FDG uptake as a marker were 90.0%, 77.8%, and 86.2%, respectively. When guideline-based high-risk findings were used as markers, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for mural nodules were 50.0%, 66.7%, and 55.2%, while they were 40.0%, 56%, and 48.3% for main duct dilatation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FDG uptake on PET is a useful new marker for malignancy in benign/malignant differentiation. Because PET/CE-CT imaging is a noninvasive imaging modality that can evaluate FDG uptake in addition to the conventional high-risk findings, we believe it should be the first-line method for determining therapeutic approaches to IPMN.