Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a patient treated with clotiapine.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which is linked to the use of antipsychotic medication, is a potentially lethal neurological emergency. The interest of our study is that NMS induced by the use of clotiapine has never previously been described. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We present the case of a 61-year old man whose sleep disorders were treated with clotiapine 40 mg/day. After 7 days of taking 40 mg clotiapine, the patient presented with a deterioration of his general health which had gradually taken hold, with altered consciousness accompanied by generalised muscle rigidity and hypersalivation. Laboratory blood tests revealed elevated levels of Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) at 812 U/l. The patient was diagnosed with NMS and treated accordingly. RESULTS: The mechanism that underlies the appearance of NMS remains largely unknown. Clotiapine is a second-generation antipsychotic, first released onto the market in the 1970s, and is available in a few countries, including Belgium. NMS is treated as a medical emergency due to the possibility of morbidity and death. The first step in the treatment of NMS consists in withholding the agent suspected of provoking the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: NMS is difficult to diagnose due to a great variability in clinical presentations and the absence of specific tests and laboratory results. The use of clotiapine in treating sleep disorders can provoke NMS as a life-threatening side-effect. To our knowledge, this is the first time a case of clotiapine-induced NMS has been published.

Randomized Trial of the Effect of Four Second-Generation Antipsychotics and One First-Generation Antipsychotic on Cigarette Smoking, Alcohol, and Drug Use in Chronic Schizophrenia.

No large-scale randomized trial has compared the effect of different second-generation antipsychotic drugs and any first-generation drug on alcohol, drug and nicotine use in patients with schizophrenia. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trial of Intervention Effectiveness study randomly assigned 1432 patients formally diagnosed with schizophrenia to four second-generation antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, risperidone quetiapine, and ziprasidone) and one first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) and followed them for up to 18 months. Secondary outcome data documented cigarettes smoked in the past week and alcohol and drug use severity ratings. At baseline, 61% of patients smoked, 35% used alcohol, and 23% used illicit drugs. Although there were significant effects of time showing reduction in substance use over the 18 months (all p < 0.0001), this study found no evidence that any antipsychotic was robustly superior to any other in a secondary analysis of data on substance use outcomes from a large 18-month randomized schizophrenia trial.

Antipsychotics-associated serious adverse events in children: an analysis of the FAERS database.

OBJECTIVE: The reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 1997 to 2011 were reviewed to assess serious adverse events induced by the administration of antipsychotics to children. METHODS: Following pre-processing of FAERS data by elimination of duplicated records as well as adjustments to standardize drug names, reports involving haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, and aripiprazole were analyzed in children (age 0-12). Signals in the data that signified a drug-associated adverse event were detected via quantitative data mining algorithms. The algorithms applied to this study include the empirical Bayes geometric mean, the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, and the information component of a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), QT prolongation, leukopenia, and suicide attempt were focused on as serious adverse events. RESULTS: In regard to NMS, the signal scores for haloperidol and aripiprazole were greater than for other antipsychotics. Significant signals of the QT prolongation adverse event were detected only for ziprasidone and risperidone. With respect to leukopenia, the association with clozapine was noteworthy. In the case of suicide attempt, signals for haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole were detected. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested that there is a level of diversity in the strength of the association between various first- and second-generation antipsychotics with associated serious adverse events, which possibly lead to fatal outcomes. We recommend that research be continued in order to gather a large variety and quantity of related information, and that both available and newly reported data be placed in the context of multiple medical viewpoints in order to lead to improved levels of care.

Quetiapine and clarithromycin-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

We report a case of neuroleptic malignant syndrome possibly caused by the combined administration of quetiapine and clarithromycin in a 75-year-old male patient. He was receiving quetiapine regularly. Two days before his admission to the hospital, he had been feverish and started receiving clarithromycin without consulting a doctor. Clarithromycin administration was interrupted 3 days after his admission because it was ineffective and because his clinical state was deteriorating. The patient presented altered level of consciousness and excessive muscular rigidity on his limbs, while he remained feverish (38.7 °C). Laboratory abnormalities included elevated serum creatine phosphokinase level (5.387 U/L), leukocytosis, and low serum iron. The patient was diagnosed with neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and quetiapine was immediately discontinued. After the following days, his muscle rigidity and mental status ameliorated, his fever withdrew, and his laboratory findings improved. The various features of the case are discussed in view of the fact that the concomitant administration of cytochrome 3A4 inhibitors, such as clarithromycin, is suggested to cause an increase of plasma concentrations of quetiapine. Thus, physicians should have a high index of suspicion of the interactions of commonly administered medications.

Possible interaction between letrozole and long-acting injectable zuclopenthixol.

Mrs A, a 68-year-old woman with paranoid schizophrenia, was on long-term psychiatric treatment with long-acting intramuscular zuclopenthixol, quetiapine and alprazolam when, in April 2012, she was diagnosed with right breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma. After starting treatment with letrozole on 4 July, Mrs A progressively developed extrapyramidal symptoms and these were particularly evident after each zuclopenthixol administration. On 9 January, both quetiapine and alprazolam were stopped due to excessive lethargy. After the administration of the last dose of zuclopenthixol on 26 January, she presented with sedation, sialorrhea, festinant gait, axial dystonia and dysphagia, all of which were severe. The introduction of letrozole was the only change that had been made to her pharmacotherapeutic regimen in that period. The rest of the findings on neurological examination were normal. Renal function was adequate. Slow symptom onset and progressive worsening until full-blown clinical presentation after 6 months, and the dramatic improvement in the clinical picture achieved 2 days after treatment with biperiden, suggests a long-term insidious interaction leading to zuclopenthixol accumulation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a possible interaction between letrozole and zuclopenthixol. We consider that it warrants further investigation. In the meanwhile, physicians should be aware of the occurrence of this potentially serious drug-drug interaction.

Atypical antipsychotic drugs and the risk for acute kidney injury and other adverse outcomes in older adults: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Several adverse outcomes attributed to atypical antipsychotic drugs, specifically quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine, are known to cause acute kidney injury (AKI). Such outcomes include hypotension, acute urinary retention, and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome or rhabdomyolysis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk for AKI and other adverse outcomes associated with use of atypical antipsychotic drugs versus nonuse. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2012. PATIENTS: Adults aged 65 years or older who received a new outpatient prescription for an oral atypical antipsychotic drug (n=97,777) matched 1:1 with those who did not receive such a prescription. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was hospitalization with AKI (assessed by using a hospital diagnosis code and, in a subpopulation, serum creatinine levels) within 90 days of prescription for atypical antipsychotic drugs. RESULTS: Atypical antipsychotic drug use versus nonuse was associated with a higher risk for hospitalization with AKI (relative risk [RR], 1.73 [95% CI, 1.55 to 1.92]). This association was consistent when AKI was assessed in a subpopulation for which information on serum creatinine levels was available (5.46% vs. 3.34%; RR, 1.70 [CI, 1.22 to 2.38]; absolute risk increase, 2.12% [CI, 0.80% to 3.43%]). Drug use was also associated with hypotension (RR, 1.91 [CI, 1.60 to 2.28]), acute urinary retention (RR, 1.98 [CI, 1.63 to 2.40]), and all-cause mortality (RR, 2.39 [CI, 2.28 to 2.50]). LIMITATION: Only older adults were included in the study. CONCLUSION: Atypical antipsychotic drug use is associated with an increased risk for AKI and other adverse outcomes that may explain the observed association with AKI. The findings support current safety concerns about the use of these drugs in older adults. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario.

Quetiapine-induced neutropenia in a bipolar patient with hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Quetiapine is a dibenzothiazepine derivative, similar to clozapine, which has the highest risk of causing blood dyscrasias, especially neutropenia. There are some case reports about this side effect of quetiapine, but possible risk factors are seldom discussed and identified. A case of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma that developed neutropenia after treatment with quetiapine is described here. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old Taiwanese widow with bipolar disorder was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma at age 60. She developed leucopenia after being treated with quetiapine. After quetiapine was discontinued, her white blood cell count returned to normal. CONCLUSIONS: Although neutropenia is not a common side effect of quetiapine, physicians should be cautious about its presentation and associated risk factors. Hepatic dysfunction may be one of the possible risk factors, and concomitant fever may be a diagnostic marker for adverse reaction to quetiapine.

Meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of the augmentation of antidepressants with atypical antipsychotics in patients with major depressive disorder

We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the augmentation of antidepressants (ATDs) with atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) to treat patients with major depressive disorder. A retrograde study to identify relevant patient data included databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Data from 17 trials, involving 3807 participants, were identified. The remission rate (RR) and overall response rate (ORR) of adjunctive treatment with AAPs were significantly higher than placebo treatment: RR=1.90 (95%CI=1.61-2.23, z=7.74, P<0.00001) and ORR=1.68 (95%CI=1.45-1.94, z=7.07, P<0.00001). We found that the short-term (4 weeks) treatment [ORR=1.70 (95%CI=0.98-2.95, Z=1.89, P=0.06)] was significantly different from the long-term (6-12 weeks) treatment [ORR=1.68 (95%CI=1.45-1.94, z=7.07, P<0.00001)]. No significant difference in ORR was observed between groups with or without sedative drugs. The discontinuation rate due to adverse effects was higher for adjunctive treatment with AAPs: ORR=3.32 (95%CI=2.35-4.70, z=6.78, P<0.00001). These results demonstrate that the augmentation of ATDs with AAPs (olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone) was more effective than a placebo in improving response and remission rates, although associated with a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse effects.

Effects of antipsychotics on bone mineral density and prolactin levels in patients with schizophrenia: a 12-month prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Effects of conventional and atypical antipsychotics on bone mineral density (BMD) and serum prolactin levels (PRL) were examined in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-three first-episode inpatients with schizophrenia were recruited, to whom one of three conventional antipsychotics (perphenazine, sulpiride, and chlorpromazine) or one of three atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole) was prescribed for 12 months as appropriate. BMD and PRL were tested before and after treatment. Same measures were conducted in 90 matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Baseline BMD of postero-anterior L1-L4 range from 1.04 ± 0.17 to 1.42 ± 1.23, and there was no significant difference between the patients group and healthy control group. However, post-treatment BMD values in patients (ranging from 1.02 ± 0.15 to 1.23 ± 0.10) were significantly lower than that in healthy controls (ranging from 1.15 ± 0.12 to 1.42 ± 1.36). The BMD values after conventional antipsychotics were significantly lower than that after atypical antipsychotics. The PRL level after conventional antipsychotics (53.05 ± 30.25 ng/ml) was significantly higher than that after atypical antipsychotics (32.81 ± 17.42 ng/ml). Conditioned relevance analysis revealed significant negative correlations between the PRL level and the BMD values after conventional antipsychotics. CONCLUSION: The increase of PRL might be an important risk factor leading to a high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with schizophrenia on long-term conventional antipsychotic medication.

Quetiapine fumarate extended-release for the treatment of major depression with comorbid fibromyalgia syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia and major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently co-occur. Quetiapine fumarate extended-release (quetiapine XR) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of MDD and has been shown to have analgesic properties in patients with depression. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of quetiapine XR on depressive and pain symptoms in patients with MDD and comorbid fibromyalgia, and to assess its safety and tolerability. METHODS: This was an 8-week, single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 120 nonpsychotic adult outpatients who fulfilled the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnostic criteria for MDD and whose diagnosis of fibromyalgia was confirmed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria were enrolled. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline to week 8 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D) scale. Secondary end points included other depression-rating scores, pain scores, fibromyalgia scores, measures of quality of life and global functioning, and adverse events. RESULTS: The mean change in the HAM-D score from baseline to week 8 was significantly greater in the quetiapine XR group compared with the placebo group (-10.0 versus -5.8; P = 0.001). Improvements in most secondary outcomes were also significantly greater in the quetiapine XR group. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to demonstrate that measures of depression, pain, and quality of life are significantly improved with quetiapine XR compared with placebo in patients with a dual diagnosis of MDD and fibromyalgia.

Quetiapine extended-release (Seroquel-XR) versus amitriptyline monotherapy for treating patients with fibromyalgia: a 16-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label trial.

RATIONALE: Previous open-label studies have suggested that quetiapine could be a valuable alternative for treating fibromyalgia. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine with amitriptyline for treating fibromyalgia. METHODS: This study was a randomized, open-label, flexible-dose, non-inferiority trial. Patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to receive quetiapine extended-release (XR) (N = 45) (50 to 300 mg daily) or amitriptyline (N = 45) (10 to 75 mg daily) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to endpoint in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score; the non-inferiority threshold was established at 8 points. The secondary outcomes included sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. RESULTS: Twenty-two (49%) patients in the quetiapine group and 34 (76%) patients in the amitriptyline group completed the study. We found a reduction of 9.8 points in the total FIQ score at the endpoint for the quetiapine-treated patients compared to 13.9 points for the amitriptyline-treated patients, for a difference of 4.14 points (80% confidence interval (CI) -0.70 to 8.98). No significant differences were found between the quetiapine XR and amitriptyline groups for any of the secondary outcomes. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events was higher in the quetiapine group (n = 14, 31.1%) than the amitriptyline group (n = 3, 6.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results appear to indicate that quetiapine XR does not provide similar efficacy to amitriptyline for treating patients with fibromyalgia. Quetiapine XR had a worse tolerability than amitriptyline in this population, possibly due to a relatively high starting dose.

Age and adverse drug reactions from psychopharmacological treatment: data from the AMSP drug surveillance programme in Switzerland.

QUESTION UNDER STUDY: The frequency of severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from psychotropic drugs was investigated in hospitalised psychiatric patients in relation to their age. Specifically, the incidence of ADRs in patients up to 60 years was compared to that of patients older than 60 years. METHODS: Prescription rates of psychotropic drugs and reports of severe ADRs were collected in psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland between 2001 and 2010. The data stem from the drug surveillance programme AMSP. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients exhibited severe ADRs: 517 out of 28,282 patients up to 60 years (1.8%); 182 out of 11,446 elderly patients (1.6%, ns). Logistic regression analyses showed a significantly negative relationship between the incidence of ADRs and patients' age in general and in particular for weight gain, extrapyramidal motor system (EPMS) symptoms, increased liver enzymes and galactorrhoea. A significantly negative relationship was observed for age and the dosages of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, valproic acid and lamotrigine. When comparing age groups, frequency of ADRs was lower in general for antipsychotic drugs and anticonvulsants, in particular for valproic acid in the elderly. Weight gain was found to be lower in the elderly for antipsychotic drugs, in particular for olanzapine. For the group of mood-stabilising anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, lamotrigine and valproic acid) the elderly exhibited a lower incidence of reported allergic skin reactions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that for psychiatric inpatients the incidence of common severe ADRs (e.g., weight gain or EPMS symptoms) arising from psychotropic medication decreases with the age of patients.

Quetiapine versus typical antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine is a widely used atypical antipsychotic drug for schizophrenia that has been on the market for over a decade. However, It is not clear how the effects of quetiapine differ from typical antipsychotics. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of quetiapine in comparison with typical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (March 2010), and inspected references of all identified studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised control trials comparing oral quetiapine with typical antipsychotic drugs in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. We presented chosen outcomes in a 'Summary of findings' table and comparative risks where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) based on a random-effects model. We assessed risk of bias for included studies. MAIN RESULTS: The review includes 43 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 7217 participants. Most studies were from China. The percentages of participants leaving the studies early were similar (36.5% in quetiapine group and 36.9% in typical antipsychotics group) and no significant difference between groups was apparent for leaving early due to any reason (23 RCTs n = 3576 RR 0.91 CI 0.81 to 1.01, moderate quality evidence), however, fewer participants in the quetiapine group left the studies early due to adverse events (15 RCTs, n = 3010, RR 0.48 CI 0.30 to 0.77).Overall global state was similar between groups (no clinically significant response; 16 RCTs, n = 1607, RR 0.96 CI 0.75 to 1.23, moderate quality evidence) and there was no significant difference in positive symptoms (PANSS positive subscore: 22 RCTs, n = 1934, MD 0.02 CI -0.39 to 0.43, moderate quality evidence). General psychopathology was equivocal (PANSS general psychopathology subscore: 18 RCTs, n = 1569, MD -0.20 CI -0.83 to 0.42) between those allocated to quetiapine and typical antipsychotics. However, quetiapine was statistically significantly more efficacious for negative symptoms (PANSS negative subscore: 22 RCTs, n = 1934, MD -0.82 CI -1.59 to -0.04, moderate quality evidence), however, this result was highly heterogeneous and driven by two small outlier studies with high effect sizes. Without these two studies, there was no heterogeneity and no statistically significant difference between quetiapine and typical antipsychotics.Compared with typical antipsychotics, quetiapine might cause fewer adverse effects (9 RCTs, n = 1985, RR 0.76 CI 0.64 to 0.90 number needed to treat to induce harm (NNTH) 10, CI 8 to 17), less abnormal ECG (2 RCTs, n = 165, RR 0.38 CI 0.16 to 0.92, NNTH 8, CI 4 to 55), fewer overall extrapyramidal effects (8 RCTs, n = 1,095, RR 0.17 CI 0.09 to 0.32, NNTH 3, CI 3 to 3, moderate quality evidence) and fewer specific extrapyramidal effects including akathisia, parkinsonism, dystonia and tremor. Moreover, it might cause lower prolactin level (4 RCTs, n = 1034, MD -16.20 CI -23.34 to -9.07, moderate quality evidence) and less weight gain compared with some typical antipsychotics in the short term (9 RCTs, n = 866, RR 0.52 CI 0.34 to 0.80, NNTH 8, CI 6 to 15).However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in suicide attempt, suicide, death, QTc prolongation, low blood pressure, tachycardia, sedation, gynaecomastia, galactorrhoea, menstrual irregularity and white blood cell count. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine may not differ from typical antipsychotics in the treatment of positive symptoms and general psychopathology. There are no clear differences in terms of the treatment of negative symptoms. However, it causes fewer adverse effects in terms of abnormal ECG, extrapyramidal effects, abnormal prolactin levels and weight gain.

Case reports of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in context of quetiapine use.

A retrospective analysis was followed on 20 case reports covering the possible correlation between the atypical antipsychotic, quetiapine, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), determined by the study of 7 different NMS criteria guidelines. A great majority (19) of the case studies did not meet the requirements of all 7 guidelines, frequently due to unreported information. Nor was quetiapine proven to be the sole cause of the possible NMS in the two age groups investigated. Only one case was found to have no other medication or medical conditions confounding the relationship of quetiapine and NMS symptoms, and that case was in the context of a significant quetiapine overdose. The other 19 cases demonstrated the difficulty of identifying the cause of NMS when polypharmacy and other medical conditions are involved. The authors note the need for caution in deciding both the presence of NMS and the causal factors of the symptoms.

Dibenzodiazepine derivative quetiapine- and olanzapine-induced chronic interstitial nephritis.

The dibenzodiazepine derivative is a so-called "atypical" or second-generation antipsychotic that is widely regarded as one of the most effective drug treatments for schizophrenia and depression. Quetiapine and olanzapine are novel atypical antipsychotic agents that possess much improved tolerability. To the best of our knowledge, FDA has reported three cases of olanzapine-induced interstitial nephritis. Yet there have been no known clinical reports that associate quetiapine treatment with chronic interstitial nephritis (CIN). Here, we report the occurrence of CIN in the presence of edema during quetiapine and olanzapine therapy.

A case of catatonia in a 14-year-old girl with schizophrenia treated with electroconvulsive therapy.

This article presents a case of a 14-year-old female twin with schizophrenia who developed severe catatonia following treatment with olanzapine. Under a combined treatment with amantadine, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and (currently) ziprasidone alone she improved markedly. Severity and course of catatonia including treatment response were evaluated with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). This case report emphasizes the benefit of ECT in the treatment of catatonic symptoms in an adolescent patient with schizophrenic illness.

Insulin secretion in patients receiving clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. The mechanism is thought to center on drug-induced weight gain, which starts the dysmetabolic cascade of insulin resistance, increased insulin production and pancreatic beta-cell failure. An independent effect of SGAs on insulin secretion has been suggested in animal models, but has not been demonstrated in clinical samples. OBJECTIVE: To determine the post-challenge insulin secretion in patients treated with SGAs. METHOD: We identified 520 non-diabetic individuals treated with clozapine (N=73), olanzapine (N=190), quetiapine (N=91) or risperidone (N=166) in a consecutive, single-site cohort of 783 adult psychiatric inpatients who underwent a comprehensive metabolic assessment. Insulin secretion was measured as the area under the curve (AUC(insulin)) generated by levels recorded at baseline, 30, 60 and 120 min after the intake of 75 g of glucose. The independent predictors of insulin secretion were determined with regression analysis in the entire sample and separately in patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and prediabetes. RESULTS: The post-challenge AUC(insulin) was independently predicted by AUC(glucose), waist circumference, triglyceride levels and younger age (p<0.0001); non-smoking status (p=0.0012); and treatment with clozapine (p=0.021). The model explained 33.5% of the variance in insulin secretion (p<0.0001). The clozapine effect was present in the NGT group, but not in prediabetics. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine, but not olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, is an independent predictor of post-challenge insulin secretion in non-diabetics, particularly in those with normal glucose tolerance. The findings suggest that the diabetogenic risk of clozapine may persist even after weight reduction.

Add-on treatment of quetiapine for fibromyalgia: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week trial.

Recently, second-generation antipsychotic drugs have attracted interest in the treatment of chronic pain, including fibromyalgia (FM). Preliminary uncontrolled studies have shown that quetiapine treatment may be helpful for FM patients. In this trial, we sought to examine-for the first time-the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine as a treatment for FM and its associated psychiatric symptoms. This was a 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine XR as an add-on treatment for FM syndrome. Fifty-one female FM patients were randomized, and a flexible dosage of 50 to 300 mg/d was used. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to end point in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score. Secondary outcomes included mood symptoms, sleep disturbances, and tender points. Using a low dose (mean = 132.2 mg) of quetiapine, we observed significant benefits of drug treatment on sleep, uncertain effects on FM and mood symptoms, but no effects on pain, in a small group of polymedicated FM patients. Quetiapine was generally well tolerated.

Dysregulation of adipocytokines related to second-generation antipsychotics in normal fasting glucose patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The underlying mechanism for second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-related glucose-lipid metabolic dysfunction is not fully understood. Recent studies have suggested a possible impact of SGAs on endocrine regulation, especially on adipocytokines. We examined the effect of each SGA on various adipocytokines in normal fasting glucose (NFG) subjects. METHOD: The study population comprised 113 Japanese inpatients with schizophrenia who were treated with olanzapine, risperidone, or quetiapine, and 123 healthy control (CONT) volunteers. All of the subjects were diagnosed with NFG. Plasma concentration of adiponectin, leptin, tumor necrosis factor α, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were compared between the SGA and CONT groups. RESULTS: Second-generation antipsychotic subjects had significantly higher leptin levels in comparison to the CONT subjects. The plasma concentration of adiponectin, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the SGA subjects were significantly lower than those in the CONT subjects. There were no significant differences in tumor necrosis factor α, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between the 2 groups. In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, olanzapine was found to be a factor that contributed to decreased adiponectin levels, and the CONT subjects were detected to be a factor associated with lower leptin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates the possibility that the administration of SGAs may affect adipocytokines in the NFG stage, excluding the impaired fasting glucose group, which is in the transition stage into diabetes mellitus.