Longitudinal Evaluation of Biomechanical Indices in Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus Classified as Having Very Asymmetric Ectasia With Normal Topography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical longitudinal variability and progression of tomographically normal fellow eyes of patients with keratoconus. METHODS: Of 513 patients with keratoconus, 30 patients with tomographically normal fellow eyes were included in this study. Tomographic and biomechanical parameters of the Pentacam and Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) were analyzed in multiple follow-up examinations, including the ABCD grading, Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia total deviation index (BAD-D), Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF), and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI). A mixed regression model was applied. The results were compared to a healthy control group (n = 17) and a keratoconus group (n = 20). RESULTS: Within a maximum observation period of 3.3 years, no fellow eye (0%) showed a progression to tomographically evident keratoconus. No significant change in tomographic or biomechanical parameters was detected over the study period. The indices BAD-D, CBI, CbiF, and TBI exhibited a certain variability over time, whereas the tomographic ABC parameters and maximum keratometry barely changed. This was also shown in the control group and for all parameters in the keratoconus group, except the TBI. CONCLUSIONS: During the observation period none of the normal fellow eyes progressed to tomographically detectable keratoconus. However, biomechanical parameters CBI, CbiF, and TBI showed pathological values in 43.3% of eyes and certain variability. Subsequent studies with a longer observation period are warranted to confirm the biomechanical trends seen in this study and to rate the ability of single measurements to diagnose early keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e48-e56.].

Idiopathic dilatation of the submandibular gland duct.

Lithiasis and stenosis may cause salivary duct dilatation due to the increased pressure in the duct upstream of the obstruction. Idiopathic dilatations, also called megaducts, with no associated increase in pressure, have only been described in the parotid gland. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of submandibular duct dilatation unrelated to lithiasis, stenosis, or an imperforate duct, to report the existence of submandibular megaducts. This retrospective single-centre study included patients treated at La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France, between 2007 and 2019. Patients with submandibular duct dilatation of ≥4 mm confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging sialography (sialo-MRI), who also underwent sialendoscopy to identify any associated stenosis, were included. Patients with lithiasis, stenosis, an imperforate ostium, or a history of trauma or surgery to the floor of the mouth were excluded. Five patients (three female, two male) aged 30-76 years with idiopathic duct dilatations in nine submandibular glands were included. The most commonly reported symptoms were submandibular swelling, pruritus, and discomfort, mostly outside mealtimes. Recurrence of symptoms after treatment was frequent. This study is novel in describing submandibular megaducts as opposed to dilatation caused by high pressure associated with stenosis, with confirmation by sialo-MRI and sialendoscopy.

Corneal ectasia following photorefractive keratectomy: a confocal microscopic case report and literature review.

The occurrence of corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy is a rare but serious complication of refractive surgery. Possible risk factors are not well assessed, but a probable reason is the failure to detect keratoconus preoperatively. In this report, we describe a case of corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy in a patient who presented a suspicious tomography pattern preoperatively but had no degenerative alterations associated with pathologic keratoconus, as revealed by in vivo corneal confocal microscopy. We also review eligible case reports of post-photorefractive keratectomy ectasia to find similar characteristics.

Crosslinking for post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis corneal ectasia: Transepithelial flap-on 30 minute and flap-lift 4 minute protocol.

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for management of corneal ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: CXL was performed on 18 eyes of 16 patients either with LASIK flap lift (n = 9; 365 nm, 30 mW/cm2, 4 minutes, pulse) or with transepithelial flap-on (n = 9 eyes; 365 nm, 3 mW/cm2, 30 minutes) technique. Postoperative change in maximum keratometry (Kmax), anterior elevation, posterior elevation, spherical equivalent (SE), logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), aberrations, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 18 eyes of 16 patients (11 males, 5 females) were included. Overall, Kmax flattened more after flap-on CXL (P = 0.014) compared to flap-lift CXL. The endothelial cell density and posterior elevation were stable throughout the follow-up period. Index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), keratoconus index (KI), and central keratoconus index (CKI) decreased after flap-on CXL at 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.05), whereas there were no statistically significant changes in these parameters after flap-off CXL group. The spherical aberrations and total root mean square decreased after flap-lift CXL at 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In our study, transepithelial collagen crosslinking was successfully used to halt disease progression in post-LASIK keratectasia. We recommend flap-on surgical technique for these cases.

Comprehensive management of post-LASIK ectasia: From prevention to treatment.

Post-laser in situ keratomileusis (post-LASIK) ectasia (PLE) is one of the most serious complications after refractive surgery, mainly manifested as progressive thinning and trembling thinning of the cornea, accompanied by increased myopia and astigmatism. The mechanisms behind mainly include genetic risk factors and external environmental factors such as eye rubbing and cornea surgery. In order to achieve the goal of reducing the incidence of ectasia, preoperative screening strategies need to be continuously improved, through the collection and assessment of genetic and environmental risk factors. Although previous preoperative screening methods did not have a uniform standard, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) can help us process a large amount of information and make rational use of the data. By using high-fidelity finite element modelling, differences in preoperative and postoperative strain distributions can be observed, which can predict the risk of postoperative ectasia. In this review, we describe the incidence, aetiology, prevention and treatment of PLE for the purpose of comprehensive management. In terms of treatment, corneal collagen cross-linking has been widely used to treat progressive keratoconus and other ectasia disease, either as a preventive measure during surgery or as a therapeutic modality after surgery to prevent progression of corneal dilation. Although the standard Dresden protocol has been identified as the gold standard treatment for corneal dilatation, a series of refinements, investigations and long-term studies have been conducted in recent years. Thus, understanding the factors involved in delaying the onset and slowing progression of cornea ectasia will be key to reducing the incidence worldwide.

Corneal ectasia detection by epithelial pattern standard deviation from OCT.

PURPOSE: To test the ability of the corneal epithelial pattern standard deviation (PSD) to distinguish between normal and cases with corneal ectatic condition. SETTING: Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective study. METHODS: Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on clinical data and corneal tomography. Groups 1 and 2 comprised 1 eye randomly selected from 105 patients with normal corneas (N) and 86 patients with bilateral keratoconus (KC). Groups 3 and 4, respectively, comprised 11 ectatic eyes with no surgical treatment for KC (very asymmetric ectasia [VAE]-E) from patients whose fellow eyes (61) presented with normal topographic patterns (VAE-NT). Corneas were scanned using an OCT system (RT Vue) and Scheimpflug corneal tomography (Pentacam) and also had biomechanical assessment through the Corvis ST. Corneal epithelial thickness maps were analyzed, and the PSD value was calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the indices. RESULTS: A total of 105 normal eyes, 86 keratoconic eyes, and 11 ectatic eyes whose fellow eyes (61) presented normal topographic patterns were evaluated. Epithelial PSD was significantly different across the 4 groups ( P < .0001). The pairwise comparison revealed that the normal group presented significantly lower values than both ectasia groups (KC and VAE-E, P < .0001) and the VAE-NT group ( P = .0008). There was no statistical significant difference between KC and VAE-E ( P = .4284), while they were significantly higher than the VAE-NT group ( P < .0001 and P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial PSD can be used to detect abnormal epithelial thickness patterns. Corneal epithelial thickness changes could be detected accurately in patients with KC, even in the form fruste of the disease.

Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the parameters in the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display built in Pentacam, which is designed for the screening of subclinical keratoconus (SKC) built in Pentacam, and the parameters in Corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST). METHODS: A retrospective study: The fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus cases were diagnosed with SKC. Patients presented to Shanxi Eye Hospital with SKC from October 2020 to November 2021 were included as the SKC group, and myopic patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery at the Refractive Surgery Department in our hospital within the same period were included as the control group. The Belin/Ambrósio and Corvis ST parameters were extracted from the system and analyzed using independent samples t test. Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were also created to test the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter. RESULTS: There were 70 patients (70 eyes) in the SKC group and 137 patients (137 eyes) in the control group. For Corvis ST parameters, Radius (P = 0.021), PachySlope (P = 0.040), SP-A1 (P = 0.002), A2 Deformation Amp. (P = 0.028), A2 Deflection Length (P < 0.001), Max ICR (P = 0.005), DA Ratio Max (1 mm) (P = 0.023), IR (P = 0.016), CBI (P = 0.003) and TBI (P < 0.001) were statistically different between the two groups. For Belin/Ambrósio parameters, PPI min. Axis, ART min, ART max, ART avg, Pachy min, Front K2, Astig, BAD-Df, BAD-Db, BAD-Dp, BAD-Dt, BAD-Da, BAD-D, PPI min, PPI max, PPI max. Axis, PPI avg and Dist.Apex-Thin.Loc. were significantly different between the two groups (all p < 0.001). TBI and BAD-D showed the best diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of 0.944 and 0.965, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Some Belin/Ambrósio and Corvis ST parameters differed between SKC eyes and eyes with normal cornea. TBI and BAD-D showed the ideal diagnostic performance for SKC. In clinical practice, conventional corneal topography could not be replaced by Corvis ST.

Unexpectedly high corneal flap thickness and ectasia after mechanical LASIK / Espessura inesperadamente alta do flap corneano e ectasia após LASIK mecânico

ABSTRACT LASIK is a refractive surgical procedure in which a corneal flap is created to expose the corneal stromal bed. Preoperative estimation of corneal flap thickness is necessary to calculate the percentage tissue altered in LASIK, an important quantitative risk factor for ectasia. The objective of this study was to assess flap thickness and calculate percentage tissue altered to check if unexpectedly thicker flaps and higher percentage tissue altered could pose as risk factors of ectasia. Four subjects (eight eyes) were submitted to mechanical LASIK in 2009 and 2010. Pre and postoperative clinical and tomographic data were reviewed. Mean preoperative estimated percentage tissue altered was 39.18±1.31%, which was borderline for increased ectasia risk when considering the limit of 40%. However, when considering the postoperatively measured flap thickness, the actual mean percentage tissue altered turned out to be 45.17 ± 4.13%, which was significantly higher than predicted preoperatively (p=0.002). Unexpectedly higher postoperative percentage tissue altered may be responsible for corneal ectasia after mechanical LASIK.

RESUMO A LASIK é um procedimento cirúrgico refrativo, no qual um retalho corneano é criado para expor o leito estromal corneano. A estimativa pré-operatória da espessura do retalho corneano é necessária para calcular o percentual de tecido alterado no LASIK, um importante fator de risco quantitativo para ectasia. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a espessura do retalho e calcular o percentual de tecido alterado para verificar se retalhos inesperadamente mais espessos e percentuais de tecido alterado mais altos poderiam representar fatores de risco de ectasia. Quatro indivíduos (oito olhos) foram submetidos à LASIK mecânica em 2009 e 2010. Dados clínicos e tomográficos pré e pós-operatórios foram revisados. A média de percentual de tecido alterado pré-operatória estimada foi de 39,18±1,31%, limítrofe para risco aumentado de ectasia quando considerado o limite de 40%. No entanto, ao considerar a espessura do retalho medida no pós-operatório, o percentual de tecido alterado médio real foi de 45,17±4,13%, ou seja, significativamente maior do que o previsto no pré-operatório (p=0,002). O percentual de tecido alterado pós-operatóriao inesperadamente mais alto pode ser responsável pela ectasia da córnea após LASIK mecânico.

Ectasia Risk Model: A Novel Method Without Cut-off Point Based on Artificial Intelligence Improves Detection of Higher-Risk Eyes.

PURPOSE: To develop a new ectasia risk model through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, enabling the creation of an integrated method without a cut-off point per risk factor, and subsequently better at differentiating patients at higher risk of ectasia with normal topography. METHODS: This comparative case-control study included 339 eyes with normal preoperative topography, with 65 eyes that developed ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (ectasia group) and 274 eyes that did not develop ectasia (control group). The AI model used known risk factors to engineer 14 additional ones, totaling 20 features. In this methodology, no variable is used in isolation because its cut-off point is never considered. All separation between cases and controls is made through the interaction detected by the machine learning model that gathers the variables considered relevant. The ability to correctly separate ectatic cases identified as high risk, ectatic cases wrongly classified as low risk, and controls were illustrated by the diagram t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE). RESULTS: Only two original variables (percent tissue altered and corneal thickness) and two derived from the feature engineering process (derivative percent tissue altered and age weighted value) were selected by the final AI model (ie, best performing AI-based model to separate patients at higher risk). The t-SNE visualization demonstrated the greater ability to differentiate between patients considered at risk by the AI-based model, without a cut-off point, compared to all other methods used alone (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a new AI-based model that integrates different risk factors without a cut-off point, increasing the number of cases correctly identified as at higher risk. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(11):716-724.].

Detection of Corneal Ectasia Using OCT Maps of Pachymetry and Posterior Surface Mean Curvature.

PURPOSE: To quantify the abnormal corneal thinning and posterior surface steepening that is observed in keratoconus with an Ectasia Index. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to image the corneas of normal individuals and patients with varying stages of keratoconus (manifest, subclinical, and forme fruste). Maps of corneal pachymetry and posterior surface mean curvature were generated, and an Ectasia Index was calculated by multiplying Gaussian fits obtained from the two types of maps. Repeated five-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the ability of the Ectasia Index to differentiate between normal and keratoconic eyes. The classification performance of the Ectasia Index was compared to minimum pachymetry and maximum posterior mean curvature. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes from 16 normal individuals, 89 eyes from 63 patients with manifest keratoconus, 16 eyes from 15 patients with subclinical keratoconus, and 26 eyes from 26 patients with forme fruste keratoconus were included in the study. During cross-validation, 100% of the eyes with manifest (89 of 89) and subclinical (16 of 16) keratoconus were correctly classified by the Ectasia Index. The average classification accuracy for the forme fruste keratoconus group was 63 ± 21% (16.4 of 26). The specificity for the normal group was 91 ± 10% (29.1 of 32). The Ectasia Index had a higher sensitivity for keratoconus detection and similar specificity in comparison to minimum pachymetry and maximum posterior mean curvature. CONCLUSIONS: The Ectasia Index could be a valuable additional metric for clinicians to consider when screening for keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):502-510.].

Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of biomechanical indices provided by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments) and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) to distinguish between normal eyes and eyes with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and mild and moderate keratoconus. METHODS: This prospective, observational, and monocentric study included normal eyes (defined as keratoconus percentage index < 60, Belin/Ambrósio total deviation value [BAD-D] < 1.6, inferior-superior keratometry [I-S value] < 1.45 and maximum keratometry [Kmax] < 47) and eyes with clinical bilateral keratoconus (mild and moderate) and VAE (defined as unilateral keratoconus, where one eye showed a clinical keratoconus and the fellow eye was topographically normal [VAE-NT] or topographically and tomographically normal [VAE-NTT]). All eyes were measured by the Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), ORA, and Corvis ST. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to test the diagnostic ability. RESULTS: Fifty-eight normal eyes and 238 ectatic eyes were included. The highest area under the curve (AUC) was provided by the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) with an AUC of 0.979, followed by ORA corneal resistance factor (0.865), and corneal hysteresis (0.824) separating normal eyes from all ectatic subgroups. The AUC of the CBI was statistically significantly higher than all other parameters (DeLong test, P < .001). A sensitivity of 100% and 70.9%, respectively, and a specificity of 93.1% was found to distinguish normal eyes from VAE-NT and VAE-NTT using a cut-off value of 0.2. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of biomechanical properties is an additional important method to evaluate corneal ectasia independent of its stage. The CBI provides further information for ectasia screening in cases where corneal topography and tomography are clinically not suspicious by using a cutoff of 0.2. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(6):364-372.].

New artificial intelligence index based on Scheimpflug corneal tomography to distinguish subclinical keratoconus from healthy corneas.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficiency of an index derived from multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to measure differences in corneal tomography findings between subclinical keratoconus (KC) in 1 eye, corneal ectasia, and healthy corneas. SETTING: 2 private Brazilian ophthalmological centers. DESIGN: Multicenter case-control study. METHODS: This study included 187 eyes with very asymmetric ectasia and with normal corneal topography and tomography (VAE-NTT) in the VAE-NTT group, 2296 eyes with healthy corneas in the control group (CG), and 410 eyes with ectasia in the ectasia group. An index, termed as Boosted Ectasia Susceptibility Tomography Index (BESTi), was derived using MLRA to identify a cutoff point to distinguish patients in the 3 groups. The groups were divided into 2 subgroups with an equal number of patients: validation set and external validation (EV) set. RESULTS: 2893 patients with 2893 eyes were included. BESTi had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 with 86.02% sensitivity (Se) and 83.97% specificity (Sp) between CG and the VAE-NTT group in the EV set, which was significantly greater than those of the Belin-Ambrósio Deviation Index (BAD-D) (AUC: 0.81; Se: 66.67%; Sp: 82.67%; P < .0001) and Pentacam random forest index (PRFI) (AUC: 0.87; Se: 78.49%; Sp: 79.88%; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: BESTi facilitated early detection of ectasia in subclinical KC and demonstrated higher Se and Sp than PRFI and BAD-D for detecting subclinical KC.

The false positive rates for detecting keratoconus and potential ectatic corneal conditions when evaluating astigmatic eyes with Scheimpflug Technology.

PURPOSE: To quantify the false positive rates for keratoconus (KC) and potential ectatic corneal conditions in highly astigmatism eyes when using published parameters/indices obtained from the Pentacam and Galilei units. SETTING: Oftalmosalud Instituto de Ojos, Lima, Peru. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: 67 consecutive eyes with corneal astigmatism > 1.5 D, with a minimum follow ups of 36 months after an uneventful LASIK procedure were included. Indices for KC and other potential ectatic corneal conditions (subclinical KC, forme fruste KC, suspect KC) were obtained using the Pentacam and Galilei Scheimpflug cameras. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The false positive rates for KC and potential ectatic corneal conditions were measured. Cut off values provided by previous studies and company-based parameters were used to assess the rate of false positivity. RESULTS: The range of false positive rates for a KC diagnosis depending on the lowest and highest cutoff values were: index of height decentration (61% - 1%), index of surface variance (76% - 0%), Posterior elevation (55% - 0%), maximum Ambrosio Relational thickness (100% - 13%), Belin Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display total deviation value (100% - 4%), Average pachymetric progression index (69% - 3%), Pachymetry at the thinnest point (58% - 1%), CSI Center Surround Index (100%), Differential sector index (51%). CONCLUSION: The false positive rates for KC and ectatic corneal conditions vary dramatically depending on the cut-off values used. Some indexes used for diagnosis of potential ectatic corneal conditions are inaccurate in normal, highly astigmatic eyes.

Case Report: Bilateral Corneal Ectasia Developed during Pregnancy after Small-incision Lenticule Extraction.

SIGNIFICANCE: This case highlights that hormonal changes during pregnancy could affect the biomechanical stability of the cornea and lead to corneal ectasia during pregnancy after corneal refractive surgery. PURPOSE: We report an unusual case of bilateral corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction that developed during pregnancy. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman experienced post-small-incision lenticule extraction corneal ectasia. Her pre-operative corneal topography was normal, with a minimum central corneal thickness of 538 µm in the right eye and 530 µm in the left eye. The manifest refraction was -7.75 -0.25 × 180 and -7.50 -0.75 × 10, and the lenticule thickness was 140 and 139 µm in the right and left eyes, respectively. After 11 months, in her first trimester, the patient began to experience gradually deteriorating blurred vision. Two years post-operatively, corneal ectasia was diagnosed based on topographic data. The automatic optometer examination was -7.25 -2.50 × 42 in the right eye and -11.00 -5.00 × 140 in the left eye. Later, the patient underwent corneal collagen cross-linking to control further progression and was recommended to wear rigid gas-permeable contact lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should be alert for cornea ectasia after refractive surgery in pregnant patients, as hormonal changes during pregnancy may affect corneal biomechanical stability.

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Machine Learning Classifiers for Early Detection of Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To compare the agreement between artificial intelligence (AI)-based classifiers and clinical experts in categorizing normal cornea from ectatic conditions. METHODS: Prospective diagnostic test study at Noor Eye Hospital. Two hundred twelve eyes of 212 patients were categorized into three groups of 92 normal, 52 subclinical keratoconus (SKCN), and 68 KCN eyes based on clinical findings by 3 independent expert examiners. All cases were then categorized using four different classifiers: Pentacam Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia total deviation value (BADD) and Topographic Keratoconus Classification (TKC), Sirius Phoenix, and OPD-Scan III Corneal Navigator. The performance of classifiers and their agreement with expert opinion were investigated using the sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa index (κ). RESULTS: For detecting SKCN, Phoenix had the highest agreement with the clinical diagnosis (sensitivity, specificity, and κ of 84.62%, 90.0%, and 0.70, respectively) followed by BADD (55.56%, 86.08%, 0.42), TKC (26.92%, 97.50%, 0.30), and Corneal Navigator (30.77%, 93.75%, 0.29). For KCN diagnosis, the highest agreement with expert opinion was seen for Phoenix (80.02%, 96.60%, 0.79), BADD (95.59%, 85.42%, 0.75), TKC (95.59%, 84.03%, 0.73), and Corneal Navigator (67.65%, 96.45%, 0.68). Analysis of different classifiers showed that Phoenix had the highest accuracy for differentiating KCN (91.24%) and SKCN (88.68%) compared to other classifiers. CONCLUSIONS: Although AI-based classifiers, especially Sirius Phoenix, can be very helpful in detecting early keratoconus, they cannot replace clinical experts' opinions, particularly for decision-making before refractive surgery. Albeit, there may be concerns about the accuracy of clinical experts as well.

Understanding Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping.

Corneal epithelial thickness (CET) and the regional variations in response to changes in corneal architecture and biomechanics have recently drawn the interest of corneal surgeons. Corneal epithelium possesses the tremendous capability of remodeling and changing its thickness. This remodeling of corneal epithelium takes place in response to underlying stromal irregularities which can result from a variety of corneal disorders including corneal ectasia. Measurement of CET can reveal the underlying stromal abnormalities and supplement in early diagnosis of corneal disorders especially corneal ectasia which has been one of the leading challenges in planning corneal refractive surgery. A significant number of patients ends up in ectasia after refractive surgery and the most common cause of this complication is the presence of preoperative subclinical keratoconus. Furthermore, postoperative complications of corneal refractive surgery are partly masked by epithelial remodeling and make the diagnosis and management difficult and extremely challenging. This leads not only to unpredictable visual and refractive outcome but also the need of multiple interventions to treat these complications. Although corneal tomography is considered as gold standard in the detection and diagnosis of corneal ectasia, a small number of subclinical cases may still go undetected. In this review, we have highlighted the underlying mechanism of epithelial remodeling, the devices and imaging modalities used to measure CET, and application of epithelial mapping in the diagnosis and management of various corneal disorders.

Diagnosis and management of postrefractive surgery ectasia.

Postrefractive surgery ectasia is a serious, sight-threatening complication seen after the following procedures: laser in situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, small-incision lenticule extraction, radial keratotomy, and/or arcuate keratotomy. Specific risk factors may include age, corneal thickness, degree of refractive error, corneal topographic changes including irregular astigmatism, percent tissue ablation, and residual stromal bed. Biomarkers may be a new option to help indicate who is at greatest risk for ectasia. Visual aids including spectacles or contacts lenses are often required to achieve optimal vision. Collagen crosslinking is the only treatment believed to stop progression of ectasia and prevent keratoplasty. Other surgical options may include topography-guided phototherapeutic keratectomy and intrastromal corneal ring segments. Ultimately, an "ounce of prevention is a pound of cure," so careful preoperative screening and ultimately offering the safest and most effective treatments for patients is arguably the most important job of the refractive surgeon.

Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display in cataract surgery and relation to final visual acuity / Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display na cirurgia de catarata e sua relação com a acuidade visual final

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze and describe the coefficients found on maximum Ambrósio Relational Thickness-Maximum (ART-Max) and Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display total deviation (BAD-D) in eyes with normal corneal topography subjected to cataract surgery with premium intraocular lens implantation and correlated these data with final visual acuity. Methods ART-Max and BAD-D data from 103 eyes of patients subjected to implantation of diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, with normal corneal topography who achieved visual acuity of 20/20 or 20/25 without correction after cataract surgery were analyzed. The groups with normal and abnormal values were compared using the chi-square test. Results Thirty-two (31.1%) and 71 (68.9%) eyes presented normal and abnormal ART-Max values, respectively. The difference between these groups was significant (p=0.0002). Fifty-five (53.4%) and 48 (46.6%) eyes had normal and abnormal BAD-D, respectively, and intergroup difference was not significant (p=0.9576). Conclusion Among patients with normal corneal topography who underwent premium intraocular and had good final visual acuity of 20/20 or 20/25, suspicious or abnormal indices of ART-Max and BAD-D were frequent, providing evidence that it possibly should not be a contraindication.

RESUMO Objetivo Analisar e descrever os coeficientes numéricos encontrados nos exames Ambrósio Relational Thickness-Maximum (ART-Max) e desvio total do Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (BAD-D) em olhos com topografia normal submetidos ao implante de lente intraocular premium na cirurgia de catarata, correlacionando-os com a acuidade visual final pós-operatória. Métodos Foram analisados os resultados de ART-Max e BAD-D de 103 olhos de pacientes submetidos ao implante de lentes bifocais difrativas, que apresentavam exame topográficos normal e alcançaram acuidade visual 20/20 ou 20/25 sem correção visual no pós-operatório final. Para a análise estatística entre os grupos normais e anormais ou suspeitos, utilizou-se o teste do qui-quadrado. Resultados Foram encontrados 32 (31,1%) olhos com ART-Max normal e 71 (68,9%) com ART-Max suspeito/anormal. A diferença entre os grupos foi significativa (p=0,0002). Quanto ao BAD-D, foram encontrados 55 (53,4%) olhos com resultados normais e 48 (46,6%) com resultados suspeitos/anormais. A diferença entre os grupos não foi significativa (p=0,9576). Conclusão Entre os pacientes com topografia normal submetidos ao implante de lentes premium e que alcançaram acuidade visual 20/20 ou 20/25, os índices suspeitos ou anormais de ART-Max e BAD-D eram frequentes, não se configurando em contraindicação para a realização do implante.