The Effect of Adenosine Signaling on Memory Impairment Induced by Pentylenetetrazole in Zebrafish.

Epilepsy is characterized by the manifestation of spontaneous and recurrent seizures. The high prevalence of comorbidities associated with epilepsy, such as cognitive dysfunction, affects the patients quality of life. Adenosine signaling modulation might be an effective alternative to control seizures and epilepsy-associated comorbidities. This study aimed to verify the role of adenosine modulation on the seizure development and cognitive impairment induced by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) in zebrafish. At first, animals were submitted to a training session in the inhibitory avoidance test and, after 10 min, they received an intraperitoneal injection of valproate, adenosine A1 receptor agonist cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), adenosine A2A receptor antagonist ZM 241385, adenosine deaminase inhibitor erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nony1)-adenine hydrochloride (EHNA) or the nucleoside transporter inhibitor dipyridamole. Thirty min after the intraperitoneal injection, the animals were exposed to 7.5 mM PTZ for 10 min, where they were evaluated for latency to reach the seizure stages (I, II, and III). Finally, 24 h after the training session, the animals were submitted to the inhibitory avoidance test to verify their cognitive performance during the test session. Valproate, CPA, and EHNA showed antiseizure effects and prevented the memory impairment induced by PTZ exposure. DPCPX, ZM 241385, and dipyridamole pretreatments caused no changes in seizure development; however, these drugs prevented memory impairment without altering locomotion. Our results reinforce the antiseizure effects of adenosine signaling and support the idea that the involvement of adenosine in memory processes may be a target for preventive strategies against cognitive impairment associated with epilepsy.

In vivo phenotypic validation of adenosine receptor-dependent activity of non-adenosine drugs.

Some non-adenosinergic drugs are reported to also act through adenosine receptors (ARs). We used mouse hypothermia, which can be induced by agonism at any of the four ARs, as an in vivo screen for adenosinergic effects. An AR contribution was identified when a drug caused hypothermia in wild type mice that was diminished in mice lacking all four ARs (quadruple knockout, QKO). Alternatively, an adenosinergic effect was identified if a drug potentiated adenosine-induced hypothermia. Four drugs (dipyridamole, nimodipine, cilostazol, cyclosporin A) increased the hypothermia caused by adenosine. Dipyridamole and nimodipine probably achieved this by inhibition of adenosine clearance via ENT1. Two drugs (cannabidiol, canrenoate) did not cause hypothermia in wild type mice. Four other drugs (nifedipine, ranolazine, ketamine, ethanol) caused hypothermia, but the hypothermia was unchanged in QKO mice indicating non-adenosinergic mechanisms. Zinc chloride caused hypothermia and hypoactivity; the hypoactivity was blunted in the QKO mice. Interestingly, the antidepressant amitriptyline caused hypothermia in wild type mice that was amplified in the QKO mice. Thus, we have identified adenosine-related effects for some drugs, while other candidates do not affect adenosine signaling by this in vivo assay. The adenosine-modulating drugs could be considered for repurposing based on predicted effects on AR activation.

Allopurinol, dipyridamole and calcium channel blockers in the treatment of bipolar disorder - A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Improved treatments for bipolar disorder (BD) are needed. Drug repurposing aims to find novel targets for drugs that have been used for other indications. This study investigated the risk of psychiatric hospitalization associated with use of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs; dihydropyridines, diltiazem, verapamil) and adenosine modulators (allopurinol, dipyridamole) in BD in within-individual design. METHODS: Individuals diagnosed with BD (ICD-10: F30-F31) were identified from the inpatient, specialized outpatient, sickness absence, and disability pension registers during 1996-2018 in Finland (N = 60,045). The main outcome was hospitalization due to affective symptoms (ICD-10: F30-F39). Within-individual models in stratified Cox regression were used and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) reported. RESULTS: Use of CCBs was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization due to affective symptoms (aHR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.78-0.88) when all CCBs were analyzed together. Of specific CCBs, use of diltiazem (0.71, 0.55-0.91) and dihydropyridines (0.83, 0.78-0.89) were associated with a decreased risk but verapamil was not (0.93, 0.73-1.19). Use of adenosine modulators in general was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalizations due to affective symptoms (0.87, 0.79-0.96). Both allopurinol (0.85, 0.74-0.97) and dipyridamole (0.89, 0.78-1.00) were associated with a marginally decreased risk. Thiazide diuretic use as a negative control was not associated with the risk of hospitalization due to affective symptoms (0.97, 0.83-1.13). LIMITATIONS: Due to the observational nature of this study, causation cannot be confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Dihydropyridines and diltiazem were associated with a decreased risk of psychiatric hospitalization in bipolar disorder. Results for allopurinol and dipyridamole were inconclusive.

Use of dipyridamole is associated with lower risk of lymphoid neoplasms: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

The anti-cancer potential of dipyridamole has been suggested from experiments, but evidence from population-based studies is still lacking. We aimed to explore if dipyridamole use was related to a lower risk of lymphoid neoplasms. We identified individuals with prescription of aspirin after diagnosis of ischaemic cerebrovascular disease since 2006 by linking several Swedish registers. In these aspirin users, those with dipyridamole prescription were further identified as the study group and patients without dipyridamole were randomly selected as reference group with 1:1 ratio using a propensity score-matching approach. After a median of 6·67 years of follow-up, a total of 46 patients with dipyridamole use developed lymphoid neoplasms with an incidence rate of 0·49 per 1 000 person-years, while the rate in the matched group was 0·74 per 1 000 person-years. As compared to non-users, dipyridamole users were associated with a significantly decreased risk of lymphoid neoplasms [hazard ratio (HR) = 0·65; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0·43-0·98]. Specifically, the reduced risk was observed for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (HR = 0·64; 95% CI = 0·42-0·94), especially B-cell lymphomas (HR = 0·56; 95% CI = 0·35-0·88). Dipyridamole use was related to a lower risk of lymphoid neoplasms, indicating a clinical potential of dipyridamole to be an adjunct anti-tumour agent against lymphoid neoplasms.

Combination therapy with or without warfarin and dipyridamole for severe childhood IgA nephropathy: an RCT.

BACKGROUND: Two previous randomized controlled trials showed that treatment of severe childhood immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy using prednisolone with azathioprine, heparin-warfarin, or dipyridamole prevented the increase of sclerosed glomeruli. Prednisolone alone, however, did not prevent further increase. These studies indicated the importance of immunosuppressants in the treatment. An additional pilot study using mizoribine instead of azathioprine enabled us to complete 2 years of combined regimen. It showed non-numerical inferior effectiveness compared with the azathioprine regimen. Further examination of the additional efficacy of warfarin and dipyridamole was required. METHODS: A randomized control trial of prednisolone and mizoribine with (group 1) or without (group 2) warfarin and dipyridamole was administered for treatment of 71 children with severe IgA nephropathy to evaluate the efficacy of additional warfarin and dipyridamole. RESULTS: Thirty of 34 patients (88.2%) in group 1, and 27 of 36 patients (75.0%) showed the disappearance of proteinuria as defined by early morning urinary protein to creatinine ratio of < 0.2 during the 2-year treatment period. The cumulative disappearance rate of proteinuria determined by the Kaplan-Meier method showed that the disappearance rate of proteinuria was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (log-rank P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in pathological findings, but there was a tendency of increase of global sclerosis in group1 which might be related to warfarin. Most of the adverse effects were related to prednisolone, but fortunately transient. CONCLUSIONS: The balance between minimal benefits of warfarin/dipyridamole and potential adverse effects may be in favor of avoiding them in children with IgA nephropathy.

Regadenoson versus Dipyridamole: A Comparison of the Frequency of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of adverse events in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with either regadenoson or dipyridamole. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 568 adults who underwent single-photon emission tomography MPI with either regadenoson (284 patients) or dipyridamole (284 patients) as a vasodilator agent, following an institution conversion from regadenoson to dipyridamole in the MPI protocol on July 15, 2013, for cost-saving purposes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected from the patients' electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was the composite occurrence of any documented adverse event in each group. Secondary endpoints were individual components of the primary endpoint, reason for termination of the MPI examination (protocol completion or premature end due to an adverse event), use of an interventional agent to an treat adverse event, and cost-related outcomes. A higher proportion of patients in the regadenoson group experienced an adverse event than those who received dipyridamole (84.9% vs 56.7%, p<0.0001). None of the patients in either group required early MPI study termination due to an adverse event. No significant differences were noted between groups regarding use of aminophylline or other interventions to treat adverse events. The overall drug cost savings in the postconversion dipyridamole group was $51,526. CONCLUSION: Dipyridamole was associated with fewer adverse events than regadenoson in patients undergoing MPI. Dipyridamole offers a safe and cost-effective alternative to regadenoson for cardiac imaging studies.

Effect of dipyridamole on myocardial reperfusion injury: A double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery.

Dipyridamole reduces reperfusion-injury in preclinical trials and may be beneficial in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, but its effect on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unknown. We hypothesized that dipyridamole limits myocardial reperfusion-injury in patients undergoing CABG. The trial design was a double-blind trial randomizing between pretreatment with dipyridamole or placebo. In all, 94 patients undergoing elective on-pump CABG were recruited between February 2010 and June 2012. The primary endpoint was plasma high-sensitive (hs-) troponin-I at 6, 12, and 24 hours after reperfusion. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of bleeding, arrhythmias, need for inotropic support, and intensive care unit length of stay. Finally, 79 patients (33 dipyridamole) were included in the per-protocol analysis. Dipyridamole did not significantly affect postoperative hs-troponin-I (change in plasma hs-troponin I -3% [95% confidence interval -23% to 36%]; P > 0.1). Secondary endpoints did not differ between groups. Dipyridamole prior to CABG does not significantly reduce postoperative hs-troponin release.

Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET.

BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a novel selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, which is administered as an intravenous bolus at a fixed dose. It is currently not clear if the absolute flow increase in response to this fixed dose is a function of distribution volume in individual patients or if it is generally comparable to the previous standard agents dipyridamole or adenosine, which are dosed based on weight. We used quantitative analysis of clinical 82Rb PET/CT studies to obtain further insights. METHODS: A total of 104 subjects with normal clinical rest/stress 82Rb perfusion PET/CT were included in a retrospective analysis. To rule out confounding factors, none had evidence of prior cardiac disease, ischaemia or infarction, cardiomyopathy, diabetes with insulin use, calcium score>400, renal disease or other significant systemic disease. A group of 52 patients stressed with regadenoson were compared with a group of 52 patients stressed with dipyridamole before regadenoson became available. The groups were matched for clinical characteristics, risk factors and baseline haemodynamics. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were quantified using a previously validated retention model, after resampling of dynamic studies from list-mode 82Rb datasets. RESULTS: At rest, heart rate, blood pressure and MBF were comparable between the groups. Regadenoson resulted in a significantly higher heart rate (34±14 vs. 23±10 beats per minute increase from baseline; p<0.01) and rate-pressure product. Patients in the regadenoson group reported less severe symptoms and required less aminophylline. Stress MBF and MFR were not different between the groups (2.2±0.6 vs. 2.1±0.6 ml/min/g, p=0.39, and 2.9±0.8 vs. 2.8±0.7, p=0.31, respectively). In the regadenoson group, there was no correlation between stress flow or MFR and body weight or BMI. CONCLUSION: Despite its administration at a fixed dose, regadenoson results in an absolute increase in MBF which is comparable to that following dipyridamole administration and is independent of patient distribution volume. This further supports its usefulness as a clinical stress agent.

Increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding following implantation of the HeartMate II LVAD.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate II (HMII) Left Ventricular Assist System (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA), an axial continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD), has been approved for use in bridge-to-transplant patients and is under investigation for destination therapy. To avoid device-related thromboembolic complications, antiplatelet, and anticoagulation therapy are routinely administered. A worrisome frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events has been observed. METHODS: A retrospective review of all 33 patients undergoing long-term LVAD implantation between June 1, 2006 and July 31, 2008 at our institution for any indication was conducted. Anticoagulation consisted of heparin (intravenous or subcutaneous) followed by transition to Coumadin therapy to a target INR of two to three. Antiplatelet therapy consisted of low-dose aspirin and dipyridamole. RESULTS: Twenty patients received the HMII and 13 patients received other devices. Eight (40%) HMII recipients suffered at least one episode of GI bleeding while no GI bleeding occurred in recipients of other devices (p = 0.012). Of 17 total bleeding episodes, no definitive source could be identified in 11 instances (65%). CONCLUSIONS: Although definitive source identification remains elusive, we believe that the majority of bleeding arises in the small bowel, possibly due to angiodysplasias, similar to the pathophysiology encountered in patients with aortic stenosis and GI bleeding. As we move toward wider use of the HMII and other axial continuous-flow devices in both bridge-to-transplant patients and for destination therapy, more studies will be necessary to understand the mechanisms of this obscure GI bleeding and develop treatment strategies to minimize its development.

Short-term effects of an anti-inflammatory treatment on clinical parameters and serum levels of C-reactive protein and proinflammatory cytokines in subjects with periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is the most common multifactorial disease, afflicting a very large proportion of the adult population. Periodontal disease secondarily causes increases in the serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and other markers of inflammation. An increased level of CRP reflects an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. The aim of the current randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the short-term effect of a combination of dipyridamole and prednisolone (CRx-102) on the levels of high-sensitivity (hs)-CRP, proinflammatory markers in blood, and clinical signs of periodontal disease. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with >/=10 pockets with probing depths >/=5 mm were randomized into two groups in this masked single-center placebo-controlled study: CRx-102 (n = 28) and placebo (n = 29). hs-CRP levels, inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-6, -1beta, -8, and -12, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma [IFN-gamma]), bleeding on probing (BOP), and changes in probing depths were evaluated. The subjects received mechanical non-surgical therapy after 42 days, and the study was completed after 49 days. RESULTS: At day 42, the differences in the hs-CRP, IFN-gamma, and IL-6 levels between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05), whereas no difference was found for the other inflammatory markers. There was no change in probing depth or BOP between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The administration of CRx-102 resulted in significant decreases in hs-CRP, IFN-gamma, and IL-6, but it did not significantly change BOP or probing depths.

[Study of efficacy and safety of pharmacological stress tests in nuclear cardiology].

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treadmill test combined with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a commonly used technique in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Many patients who cannot adequately perform exercise stress testing may nevertheless undergo pharmacological tests, most commonly with the vasodilator agents (adenosine and dipyridamole), as well as the positive inotropic agent dobutamine. Patients undergoing vasodilators stress testing with either dipyridamole or adenosine also perform simultaneous low-intensity exercise. The aim of this study was to compare various pharmacological stress tests alone or in combination with low intensity exercise as preparation for MPS in regard to incidence of adverse effects, quality of diagnostic image and the acquisition initial time. METHODS: A total of 2 205 patients underwent pharmacological stress tests. Pharmacological stress test with adenosine was applied in 493 patients. In 405 of them we performed concomitant low level exercise (50 W) by bicycle ergometar (AdenoEX). In 88 of them we performed adenosine abbreviated protocol (AdenoSCAN). In 1 526 patients we performed pharmacological stress test with dipyridamole. In 871 of them we performed concomitant low level exercise (50 W) by bicycle ergometar (DipyEX), and in 775 we used only dipyridamole protocol (DipySCAN). In 186 patients we used pharmacological stress test with dobutamine. We followed side effects of adenosine, dipyiridamole and dobutamine, compared results between protocols with concomitant low level exercise and vasodilatators only. We also compared image quality, and suggested time of acquisition after stress test. RESULTS: We found numerous side effects especially with adenosine, but these effects were short-lived and not required active interventions. Benefit with concomitant exercise in booth AdenoEX and DipyEX included decreased side effects (AdenoEX vs AdenoSCAN 620% vs 87%, respectively, and DipyEX vs DipySCAN 37% vs 59%, respectively) improved safety and patients tolerance, improved target-to-background ratios because of less subdiaphragmal activity, and earlier acquisition time. Because of producing a lot of arrhythmias (in 49% of patients) dobutamin was considered a last choice for pharmacological stress testing. CONCLUSION: Safety and efficacy of vasodilatators (adenosine, dipyridamole) pharmacological stress tests are good, but with concomitant exercise even better. The safety and efficacy of adenosin are better than those of dipyridamole. AdenoEX protocol provides good safety and patients tolerancy. In light of these benefits we recommend AdenoEX whenever possible. Dobutamine is the last pharmacological toll for MPS.

Current advances in vasodilator pharmacological stress perfusion imaging.

More than 7 million stress perfusion studies are performed in the United States annually, 44% with pharmacological vasodilator stress agents. Both adenosine and dipyridamole are nonselective coronary vasodilators that are commonly used for stress perfusion imaging. These agents are safe and provide an effective means to diagnose coronary artery disease. A newer agent, regadenoson, is an adenosine receptor agonist that is selective for coronary vasodilation. Regadenoson is noninferior to adenosine for the detection of ischemia and is better tolerated by patients. Recent trials such as INSPIRE (Adenosine Sestamibi Post-Infarction Evaluation) and the COURAGE (Results from Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Guideline-driven Drug Evaluation) Nuclear Imaging Substudy have established clearly that noninvasive risk stratification with vasodilator testing is an important and appropriate step in guiding medical therapy and invasive coronary intervention.