Metastatic Melanoma of the Common Bile Duct Presented with Dyspepsia.

Malignant melanoma (MM) is an aggressive tumor that can metastasize to any organ, but biliary tract metastasis is scarce. We describe a very rare case of MM metastasis to the common bile duct (CBD), presented with only dyspeptic symptoms. The patient had mildly elevated alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrated a dilated common bile duct with a distal stricture. The MM diagnosis was established with the ampulla of Vater biopsy specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the patient's symptoms were resolved after biliary stenting. Both primary CBD cancer and other cancer types like MM that metastasize to CBD can cause obstruction and can be manifested only by dyspeptic symptoms. MM metastasis to CBD can cause obstruction manifested only by dyspeptic symptoms without obstructive jaundice. ERCP can be employed as a promising option for treatment and diagnosis. New-onset dyspeptic symptoms in patients with a history of MM should be investigated thoroughly, especially in the context of biliary metastasis.

Development of a gastric cancer risk calculator for questionnaire-based surveillance of Iranian dyspeptic patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is considered a silent killer, taking more than three quarters of a million lives annually. Therefore, prior to further costly and invasive diagnostic approaches, an initial GC risk screening is desperately in demand. METHODS: In order to develop a simple risk scoring system, the demographic and lifestyle indices from 858 GC and 1132 non-ulcer dyspeptic (NUD) patients were analysed. We applied a multivariate logistic regression approach to identify the association between our target predictors and GC versus NUD. The model performance in classification was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Our questionnaire covering 64 predictors, included known risk factors, such as demographic features, dietary habits, self-reported medical status, narcotics use, and SES indicators. RESULTS: Our model segregated GC from NUD patients with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 85.89, 63.9, and 73.03%, respectively, which was confirmed in the development dataset (AUC equal to 86.37%, P < 0.0001). Predictors which contributed most to our GC risk calculator, based on risk scores (RS) and shared percentages (SP), included: 1) older age group [> 70 (RS:+ 241, SP:7.23), 60-70 (RS:+ 221, SP:6.60), 50-60 (RS:+ 134, SP:4.02), 2) history of gastrointestinal cancers (RS:+ 173, SP:5.19), 3) male gender (RS:+ 119, SP:3.55), 4) non-Fars ethnicity (RS:+ 89, SP:2.66), 5) illiteracy of both parents (RS:+ 78, SP:2.38), 6) rural residence (RS:+ 77, SP:2.3), and modifiable dietary behaviors (RS:+ 32 to + 53, SP:0.96 to 1.58). CONCLUSION: Our developed risk calculator provides a primary screening step, prior to the subsequent costly and invasive measures. Furthermore, public awareness regarding modifiable risk predictors may encourage and promote lifestyle adjustments and healthy behaviours.

The prevalence and risk factors of functional dyspepsia among adults in low- and middle-income countries: An international cross-sectional study.

Dyspepsia is one of the most common chronic digestive diseases, which is due to underlying organic causes that can be detected, or causes that cannot be detected called functional dyspepsia (FD). There is no epidemiological study to date that measures the prevalence and risk factors of the FD in low- and middle-income countries, so this international cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 low- and middle-income countries from data previously published its protocol NCT05340400. Participants were recruited in the period from 22/April/2022 to 14/June/2022. The diagnosis of the FD was according to clinical manifestations. We determined the physical activity, daily stress, and fatigue of the participants. A large number of collaborators were chosen from different regions and institutions within each country to achieve diversity within the sample and reduce the probability of bias. Our study concluded that the prevalence of FD is much higher in low- and middle-income countries 37.9% [6.2%-44.2%], compared to high-income countries 10% [8%-12%], with a higher rate among the Afro-Caribbean race 47.9%. Sudan obtained the highest prevalence 44.3%, then Egypt 41.4%, while the lowest prevalence was in Algeria 25.7%. Moreover, there are many risk factors, including modifiable ones, such as severe stress, chronic fatigue, smoking, abnormal BMI, insufficient or too many hours of sleep, and previous infection with Covid-19, and non-modifiable ones such as advanced age, chronic diseases, and female sex. Highlighting the prevalence and increasing risk factors of FD in low- and middle-income countries should draw the attention of those responsible for health care in these countries and reduce the risk factors.

[A plea for the reduction in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not the solution for dyspepsia]. / Pleidooi voor minder gastroscopieën.

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies are often performed in patients with dyspepsia. The diagnostic yield, however, is known to be limited, in particular in patients below 60 years without alarm symptoms. Furthermore, there are limits to the endoscopy capacity. In the Netherlands, an upper GI endoscopy may be requested by the general practitioner (also known as open access endoscopy) or medical specialists. Approximately 40% of the open access upper GI endoscopies is not indicated according to the Dutch guidelines, resulting in substantial costs weighed against limited diagnostic yield. In this article we outline several potential solutions to reduce the number of unnecessary upper GI endoscopies. These include providing patients with digital education, consulting a gastroenterologist, educating health care professionals on the diagnostic yield and reduction of the financial compensation through health insurance policy.

Confusing effect of concurrent endoscopy and colonoscopy on histopathologic findings in dyspeptic patients: a nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is recommended for patients over 60 years old with dyspeptic complaints, treatment-resistant dyspepsia, and alarming symptoms such as vomiting, weight loss, and dysphagia. However, colonoscopy is recommended for patients with abnormal colonic loops in their imaging, lower gastrointestinal bleeding-iron deficiency anemia, or patients with symptoms related to the lower gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to analyze the possibility of performing concurrent colonoscopy when it is indicated and whether this may affect endoscopic and histological findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and two patients who underwent EGD and colonoscopy (Group CC) at the same time due to dyspeptic symptoms and 146 patients who underwent EGD alone (Group EA) at SBU Kartal City Hospital between December 2020 and December 2021 were included in the study. All gastric biopsies were taken by the Sydney system. The specimens were assessed in terms of helicobacter pylori positivity, inflammation, neutrophilic activity, intestinal metaplasia, and lymphoid aggregate. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori positivity was 46.5% and 50.7% (p=0.521), inflammation was 93.1% and 98.6% (p=0.023), neutrophilic activity was 50.0% and 65.8% (p=0.013), intestinal metaplasia was 20.6% and 24.0% (p=0.531), and the presence of lymphoid aggregate was 46.1% and 58.9% (p=0.046) in Group CC and Group EA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study comparatively evaluated the histopathological findings of patients who underwent EGD due to dyspeptic symptoms and those who underwent bidirectional endoscopy. Notably, no false positive results were observed that would necessitate a change in the treatment applied to the patients.

A pattern-recognition-based clustering method for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of various gastric conditions.

Conventional endoscopic biopsy tests are not suitable for early detection of the acute onset and progression of peptic ulcer as well as various gastric complications. This also limits its suitability for widespread population-based screening and consequently, many people with complex gastric phenotypes remain undiagnosed. Here, we demonstrate a new non-invasive methodology for accurate diagnosis and classification of various gastric disorders exploiting a pattern-recognition-based cluster analysis of a breathomics dataset generated from a simple residual gas analyzer-mass spectrometry. The clustering approach recognizes unique breathograms and "breathprints" signatures that clearly reflect the specific gastric condition of an individual person. The method can selectively distinguish the breath of peptic ulcer and other gastric dysfunctions like dyspepsia, gastritis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease patients from the exhaled breath of healthy individuals with high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, the clustering method exhibited a reasonable power to selectively classify the early-stage and high-risk gastric conditions with/without ulceration, thus opening a new non-invasive analytical avenue for early detection, follow-up, and fast population-based robust screening strategy of gastric complications in the real-world clinical domain.

[Prevalence Survey of Functional Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Chinese College Students Based on Rome â £ Diagnostic Criteria].

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) among college students in China. Methods: An online questionnaire survey of college students aged 17-35 from across China was conducted. The online questionnaire survey was supplemented by an offline survey. A total of 2025 valid samples were included for statistical analysis. χ 2 test and logistic regression were performed for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of FD among college students who met the Rome Ⅳ diagnostic criteria was 5.5% (112/2025), with most of them, or 66.1% (74/112), suffering from postprandial discomfort syndrome (PDS). Smoking (odds ratio [ OR]=2.334, 95% confidence interval [ CI]: 1.187-4.589, P=0.014), depression ( OR=2.447, 95% CI: 1.421-4.214, P=0.001), and insomnia ( OR=1.947, 95% CI: 1.291-2.937, P=0.001) were positively correlated with the prevalence of FD. The prevalence of IBS was 1.9% (38/2025), with IBS-diarrhea dominant (IBS-D) being the most important subtype that accounted for 44.7%. Anxiety ( OR=3.63, 95% CI: 1.34-9.88, P=0.012) and insomnia ( OR=2.35, 95% CI: 1.18-4.68, P=0.015) were positively correlated with the prevalence of IBS. Conclusion: Based on Rome Ⅳ criteria, IBS and FD are not uncommon among Chinese university students. Psychological disorders and some related lifestyle factors may be related to the development of the disease. In the future, more series of studies based on different diagnostic criteria, different regions, and multiple factors should be conducted in China.

Usefulness of Serum Pepsinogen I as a Biomarker in Early Diagnosis of Aetiology of Dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia, according to Rome III criteria, is defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen in addition to symptoms like early satiety, postprandial fullness, bloating and nausea. Pepsinogens which are secreted by chief cells of the stomach play an important role in its physiology. They could determine the functional state of the mucosa in health and in diseased conditions. Serum levels of pepsinogen have aided the diagnosis of gastric pathologies such as atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Pepsinogen assay, being a simple, non-invasive procedure, can aid in determining the aetiology of dyspepsia especially in a resource poor setting. OBJECTIVE: This was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of serum pepsinogen I in patients with dyspepsia. METHODS: The study involved 112 adult patients with dyspepsia and an equal number of controls. A questionnaire was used to obtain biodata, clinical features and other relevant information. The patients had abdominal ultrasound scan, urea breath test and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), while the controls had only abdominal ultrasound scan. Sera prepared from 10ml of venous blood from each participant were stored at -20ºC and later analysed for pepsinogen I (PG I). RESULTS: Females predominated in both groups (F:M = 1.4:1). The mean age of cases was 51±15.9 years and was similar to that of controls 51.4±16.5. The most frequent symptom was epigastric pain in 101 (90.2%) patients. Median pepsinogen I level in patients (28.5ng/ml) was significantly lower than in controls (68.8ng/ml) (p<0.001). The most frequent endoscopic finding was gastritis. Serum PG I level at a cut-off point of 79.5ng/ml had a specificity of 88.8% and sensitivity of 40% in identifying dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Serum PG I level was lower in patients with dyspepsia than controls. It showed high specificity in identifying dysplasia and could be a biomarker for early gastric cancer.

CONTEXTE: La dyspepsie, selon les critères de Rome III, est définie comme une douleur ou une gêne centrée sur la partie supérieure de l'abdomen, en plus de symptômes tels qu'une satiété précoce, une plénitude postprandiale, des ballonnements et des nausées. Les pepsinogènes, sécrétés par les cellules principales de l'estomac, jouent un rôle important dans sa physiologie. Ils peuvent déterminer l'état fonctionnel de la muqueuse, qu'elle soit saine ou malade. Les taux sériques de pepsinogène ont facilité le diagnostic de pathologies gastriques telles que la gastrite atrophique, l'ulcère gastroduodénal et le cancer gastrique. Le dosage du pepsinogène, qui est une procédure simple et non invasive, peut aider à déterminer l'étiologie de la dyspepsie, en particulier dans un contexte de ressources limitées. OBJECTIF: Évaluer l'importance diagnostique du pepsinogène I sérique chez les patients souffrant de dyspepsie. MÉTHODES: L'étude a porté sur 112 patients adultes souffrant de dyspepsie : L'étude a porté sur 112 patients adultes souffrant de dyspepsie et un nombre égal de témoins. Un questionnaire a été utilisé pour obtenir les données biologiques, les caractéristiques cliniques et d'autres informations pertinentes. Les patients ont subi une échographie abdominale, un test respiratoire à l'urée et une endoscopie gastro-intestinale supérieure, tandis que les témoins n'ont subi qu'une échographie abdominale. Les sérums préparés à partir de 10 ml de sang veineux de chaque participant ont été conservés à -20ºC et analysés ultérieurement pour le pepsinogène I (PG I). RÉSULTATS: Les femmes prédominaient dans les deux groupes (F:M = 1,4:1). L'âge moyen des cas était de 51±15.9 ans et était similaire à celui des témoins 51.4±16.5. Le symptôme le plus fréquent était la douleur épigastrique chez 101 (90,2 %) patients. Le taux médian de pepsinogène I chez les patients (28,5 ng/ml) était significativement plus bas que chez les témoins (68,8 ng/ml) (p<0,001). Le résultat endoscopique le plus fréquent était la gastrite. Le taux sérique de PG I à un seuil de 79,5 ng/ml avait une spécificité de 88,8 % et une sensibilité de 40 % dans l'identification de la dysplasie. CONCLUSION: Le taux de PG I sérique était plus faible chez les patients souffrant de dyspepsie que chez les témoins. Il a montré une spécificité élevée dans l'identification de la dysplasie et pourrait être un biomarqueur pour le cancer gastrique précoce. Mots-clés: Dyspepsie, Pepsinogène I sérique, Helicobacter pylori, Biomarqueur.

[Comparison of two types of classification in functional dyspepsia; postprandial distress or epigastric pain vs a multidimensional cluster analysis using unsupervised learning]. / Comparación de dos tipos de clasificación en dispepsia funcional; distrés postprandial o dolor epig ástrico vs un an álisis multidimensional por conglomerados utilizando aprendizaje no supervisado.

Artificial intelligence methods using unsupervised learning tools can support problem solving by establishing unidentified grouping or classification patterns that allow typing subgroups for more individualized management. There are few studies that allow us to know the influence of digestive and extra-digestive symptoms in the classification of functional dyspepsia. This research carried out a cluster unsupervised learning analysis based on these symptoms to discriminate subtypes of dyspepsia and compare with one of the currently most accepted classifications. An exploratory cluster analysis was carried out in adults with functional dyspepsia according to digestive, extra-digestive and emotional symptoms. Grouping patterns were formed in such a way that within each group there was homogeneity in terms of the values adopted by each variable. The cluster analysis method was two-stage and the results of the classification pattern were compared with one of the most accepted classifications of functional dyspepsia. Of 184 cases, 157 met the inclusion criteria. The cluster analysis excluded 34 unclassifiable cases. Patients with type 1 dyspepsia (cluster one) presented improvement after treatment in 100% of cases, only a minority presented depressive symptoms. Patients with type 2 dyspepsia (cluster two) presented a higher probability of failure to treatment with proton pump inhibitor, suffered more frequently from sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, fibromyalgia, physical limitations or chronic pain of a non-digestive nature. This classification of dyspepsia by cluster analysis establishes a more holistic vision of dyspepsia in which extradigestive characteristics, affective symptoms, presence or absence of sleep disorders and chronic pain allow discriminating behavior and response to first-line management.

From dyspepsia to complicated peptic ulcer: new markers in diagnosis and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) may present with different clinical findings, ranging from mild dyspeptic complaints to mortal complications, such as gastrointestinal system perforation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential blood parameters that can be used in the diagnosis of PUD and prediction of complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with dyspeptic complaints, 83 patients with PUD, and 108 patients with peptic ulcer perforation (PUP) who were treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in the study. Clinical findings, laboratory data, and imaging methods were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of 271 (154 men, 117 women) patients included in the study was 56.04 ± 17.98 (mean ± standard deviation) years. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume, white blood cell, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil values were higher in patients with PUP compared to other groups (p < 0.001 for all). In the PUD group, only red blood cell distribution width was significantly higher compared to the patient group with dyspeptic complaints. In the postoperative period, NLR and PLR were significantly higher in patients who developed severe complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification compared to patients who developed mild complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that simple blood parameters can be used as diagnostic markers at different stages of PUD. NLR and PLR can be helpful in the diagnosis of PUP and red blood cell distribution width can be used to differentiate patients with peptic ulcer from dyspeptic patients. Additionally, NLR and PLR can be used to predict serious postoperative complications after PUP surgery.

Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in case of dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Affecting between 20% and 90% of the world's population depending on the geo-socio-economic conditions, Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection requires an adapted management because of the medico-economic stakes it generates. Also responsible for dyspepsia, the management of Hp infection differs in this context between international guidelines. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome of the study was assessing the quality of current guidelines for HP eradication in dyspepsia. The secondary was defining the best therapeutic strategy for patients consulting with dyspepsia in the outpatient setting. METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) published between January 2000 and May 2021 were retrieved from various databases (PubMed; Guidelines International Network; websites of scientific societies that issued the guidelines). Their quality was assessed using the AGREE II evaluation grid. To provide decision support for healthcare practitioners, particularly in primary care, a summary of the main points of interest for management was made for each guideline. RESULTS: Fourteen guidelines were included. Only four (28.6%) could be validated according to AGREE II? Most of the non-validated guidelines had low ratings in the "Rigour of development" and "Applicability" domains with means of 40% [8%-71%] and 14% [0%-25%], respectively. Three out of four validated guidelines (75%) advocated a "test and treat" strategy for dyspepsia based on the national prevalence of Hp. Gastroscopy was the 1st line examination method in case of warning signs or high risk of gastric cancer. Triple therapy (Proton pomp inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) was favored for Hp eradication but required a study of the sensitivity to clarithromycin in the validated guidelines. Antibiotic resistance also had an impact on treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Many guidelines were of poor quality, providing few decision-making tools for practical use. Conversely, those of good quality had established a management strategy addressing the current problems associated with the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains.

Gastric dysmotility and gastrointestinal symptoms in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in ME/CFS, but there is a knowledge gap in the literature concerning gastrointestinal motility features and detailed symptom description. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to characterize gastric motility and gastric symptoms in response to a liquid meal. METHODS: We included 20 patients with ME/CFS with abdominal complaints who were recruited to a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of Rituximab. The patients of this sub study were examined with an ultrasound drink test, and gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated using the Rome III questionnaire and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) questionnaire. RESULTS: We found that patients commonly reported fullness/bloating (75%), abdominal pain (45%) and nausea (35%). Ultrasound measurements revealed lower proximal measurements of the stomach after a meal (p < 0.01) and larger fasting antral area (p = 0.019) compared to healthy controls. The patients had a stronger symptomatic response to the liquid meal compared to healthy controls regarding epigastric pain, discomfort and nausea (p < 0.05).Ninety percent of the patients reported bowel movement frequencies within the normal range but scored high on bowel habit dissatisfaction and life disruption. CONCLUSION: The patients presented with fullness/bloating, nausea and epigastric pain, showed signs of impaired gastric accommodation and visceral hypersensitivity, showing that the gastrointestinal symptoms of ME/CFS patients are similar to functional dyspepsia.Key summary Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in ME/CFS, but there is a knowledge gap in the literature concerning gastrointestinal motility features and detailed symptom description. • In this study, patients with ME/CFS had signs of impaired gastric accommodation after a liquid meal. • Out of 20 patients, 15 patients reported fullness/bloating, 9 reported abdominal pain, and 7 reported nausea. The patients showed signs of visceral hypersensitivity on a drink test. • Our findings suggest that patients with ME/CFS share many similarities with patients with Functional Dyspepsia. The findings were not typical for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Up-Front Endoscopy Maximizes Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Satisfaction in Uninvestigated Dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Practice guidelines promote a routine noninvasive, non-endoscopic initial approach to investigating dyspepsia without alarm features in young patients, yet many patients undergo prompt upper endoscopy. We aimed to assess tradeoffs among costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes to inform discrepancy between guidelines and practice. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model and performed cost-effectiveness/cost-satisfaction analysis over a 1-year time horizon on patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm features referred to gastroenterology. A RAND/UCLA expert panel informed model design. Four competing diagnostic/management strategies were evaluated: prompt endoscopy, testing for Helicobacter pylori and eradicating if present (test-and-treat), testing for H pylori and performing endoscopy if present (test-and-scope), and empiric acid suppression. Outcomes were derived from systematic reviews of clinical trials. Costs were informed by prospective observational cohort studies and national commercial/federal cost databases. Health gains were represented using quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: From the patient perspective, costs and outcomes were similar for all strategies (maximum out-of-pocket difference of $30 and <0.01 quality-adjusted life years gained/year regardless of strategy). Prompt endoscopy maximized cost-satisfaction and health system reimbursement. Test-and-scope maximized cost-effectiveness from insurer and patient perspectives. Results remained robust on multiple one-way sensitivity analyses on model inputs and across most willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive management strategies appear to result in inferior cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction outcomes compared with strategies promoting up-front endoscopy. Therefore, additional studies are needed to evaluate the drivers of patient satisfaction to facilitate inclusion in value-based healthcare transformation efforts.

Clinical Efficacy of Tandospirone on Functional Dyspepsia Patients with Anxiety: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is characterized with multiple symptoms of indigestion and often accompanied with anxiety. However, there is currently an absence of effective treatment. Tandospirone is commonly used to treat generalized anxiety disorders. Whether tandospirone can improve the clinical symptoms of FD remain unknown. AIMS: The present study was designed to explore the pharmacological effect of tandospirone on FD patient with anxiety, and the potential mechanisms were also elucidated. METHODS: FD patients with anxiety were randomly divided into placebo and tandospirone treatment groups. Healthy volunteers were simultaneously recruited as control group. The gastrointestinal symptom score (GIS) and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAM-A) were performed before and after treatments with placebo or tandospirone. The serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and multiple inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin (IL)-6, IL-4, IL-1ß, and IL-10 were determined. Regression analyses relating BDNF levels and gastrointestinal symptoms were performed. RESULTS: Tandospirone significantly alleviated the gastrointestinal and anxiety symptoms of FD patient, as evidenced by reductions of GIS index and HAM-A scores. Compared with the healthy volunteers, FD patients had lower BDNF and IL-10 levels, but higher levels of IL-6 and TNF-α. Importantly, tandospirone increased serum BDNF and IL-10 and decreased IL-6 levels in FD patients. Relative analysis revealed that BDNF level was negatively associated with gastrointestinal symptoms in FD patients. CONCLUSION: Tandospirone effectively improved both anxiety and gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with FD, and these therapeutic effects may be associated with the modulation of BDNF and inflammatory cytokines.

What is the Prevalence of Clinically Significant Endoscopic Findings in Subjects With Dyspepsia? Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in people with dyspepsia and understanding how symptoms can predict endoscopic pathology can help inform dyspepsia guidelines. We evaluated this in an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2010 through to January 2022 to identify relevant articles. Eligible studies enrolled adults from the community, workplace, blood donation or screening clinics, family physician offices, or internal medicine clinics. Studies were required to report prevalence of dyspepsia and perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in subjects with and without dyspepsia was pooled for all studies and compared using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data were pooled with those of the 9 studies included in the prior review. RESULTS: Of 511 papers evaluated, 184 reported prevalence of dyspepsia. Fifteen reported prevalence of endoscopic findings among 41,763 participants (40.4% with dyspepsia). Erosive esophagitis was the most common abnormality (pooled prevalence, 11.0%; 95% CI, 8.9%-13.2%) followed by peptic ulcer (pooled prevalence, 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.5%-6.7%). The only finding encountered more frequently in individuals with dyspepsia, compared with those without, was peptic ulcer (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08-2.39). More than 85% of EGDs were completely normal. Gastroesophageal cancer was rare (<0.4%) and equally prevalent among those with and without dyspepsia. CONCLUSIONS: Erosive esophagitis was the most common clinically significant finding at EGD, whereas gastroesophageal cancers were rare. Most pathology, including esophagitis and cancer, were found in similar proportions in both groups. These findings support noninvasive approaches to managing dyspepsia in the community, with EGD reserved for those at high risk of malignancy.

Comparing diagnostic performance of Cantonese-Chinese version of Rome IV criteria and a short Reference Standard for functional dyspepsia in China.

INTRODUCTION: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is diagnosed based on self-reported symptoms and negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings. The Rome criteria were not adopted as a diagnostic instrument in clinical guidelines due to their complexity. Different guidelines used relatively simple symptom assessment schemes with contents that vary significantly. A previously evaluated short Reference Standard may serve as a more standardised tool for guidelines. We evaluated its diagnostic accuracy against the Rome IV criteria in a cross-sectional study in Hong Kong. METHODS: A total of 220 dyspeptic patients sampled consecutively from a tertiary hospital and the community completed the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire, which was translated into Cantonese-Chinese, and the Reference Standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. RESULTS: Among the participants, 160 (72.7%) fulfilled the Reference Standard with negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopic results. The Reference Standard identified patients with Rome IV-defined FD with 91.1% (95% CI 82.6%-96.4%) sensitivity and 37.6% (95% CI 29.6%-46.1%) specificity. The positive and negative LRs were 1.46 (95% CI 1.26-1.69) and 0.24 (95% CI 0.11-0.49), respectively. The AUC value was 0.64 (95% CI 0.59-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: The Reference Standard can rule out patients without Rome IV-defined FD. It may be used as an initial screening tool for FD in settings where the use of the Rome IV criteria is impractical. It may also provide a uniform definition and diagnostic rule for future updates of clinical guidelines.

Dyspepsia with alarm symptoms in patients aged less than 60 years: Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy justified in Indian scenario?

BACKGROUND: Newer American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) guidelines do not suggest endoscopy to investigate alarm features for dyspepsia patients under the age of 60 to exclude upper gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia. The validity of this recommendation has not been evaluated in our population. So, this study was conducted to assess the utility of upper GI endoscopy to investigate alarm features in dyspepsia patients less than 60 years of age to exclude upper GI neoplasia. METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated consecutive patients of dyspepsia between 18 and 60 years of age, with at least one or more of the alarm symptoms (unintentional weight loss; loss of appetite; GI bleeding; anemia; recurrent or persistent vomiting; dysphagia with predominant epigastric pain; and family history of upper GI cancer) with upper GI endoscopy to exclude any organic lesion and malignancy. RESULTS: Of total 294 patients evaluated with endoscopy, 34.7% (n=102) had normal endoscopy (functional dyspepsia [FD]) while 65.3% (n=192) had abnormal endoscopic findings (organic dyspepsia [OD]). Of 192 patients with OD, 146 patients (49.6% of the total study population) had benign abnormality (benign OD) while 46 patients (15.6% of the total study population) had malignancy of the upper GI tract (malignant OD). CONCLUSION: The investigation of alarm features in dyspepsia patients less than 60 years of age with upper GI endoscopy leads to detection of organic lesion (65.3%) including malignancy (15.6%) in a significant percentage of patients.

Investigation of Eating Habits in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional habits of patients with functional dyspepsia can affect the progression of functional dyspepsia. We aimed to determine the foods and dietary habits that may cause symptoms of postprandial fullness, early satiety, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning in functional dyspepsia patients. METHODS: Sixty functional dyspepsia patients, who were diagnosed according to Rome IV criteria in the endoscopy unit of a gastroenterology institute, were included in the study. Data on the demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, nutritional habits, and food consumption frequency questionnaire of functional dyspepsia patients were collected. RESULTS: Postprandial fullness was found more common in those who preferred roasting as a cooking method. There was no significant difference between symptoms and meal frequency. Epigastric burning and pain were found to be more pronounced in women, and alcohol consumption was less in patients who experienced more epigastric pain. In non-smoker participants, the complaint of early satiety was lower. It was found that broccoli, radish, celery, green olives, and olive oil consumption was less in participants who experienced excessive postprandial fullness. Patients with stomach pain consumed less dry fruits, green olives, butter, alcohol, and fast food. It was found that patients with stomach burning consumed less alcohol and fast food. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, functional dyspepsia patients should avoid or reduce consuming broccoli, radish, celery, green olives, olive oil, dry fruits, and butter which may trigger symptoms. Reducing consumption of these foods, abandoning unhealthy cooking methods such as roasting, reducing smoking, and reducing consumption of alcohol and fast food might be beneficial for relieving symptoms.