Educational telerehabilitation program for women with pelvic floor dysfunctions after gynecological pelvic cancer treatment: protocol study for a randomized and controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Educational and self-care measures are important for women after gynecological pelvic cancer treatment. Pelvic floor muscle training exercises (PFMT) are a conservative treatment for pelvic floor (PF) dysfunction. The purpose is to evaluate the impact of a telerehabilitation and self-care program on PF dysfunctions, reports of urinary incontinence (UI), and physical-emotional factors of participants post-treatment for gynecological pelvic cancer. METHODS: Two-arm randomized clinical trial: an intervention group (IG) will evaluate the effect of a telerehabilitation program on women undergoing clinical practice of radiotherapy for the treatment of gynecological pelvic cancer and a control group (CG) will maintain the routine. Primary outcome is the prevalence of reports of UI, which will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The secondary outcomes will be the severity and impact of UI on quality of life, location and perception of pain intensity, presence and intensity of dyspareunia, vaginal stenosis, fecal incontinence (FI), and levels of physical activity. Statistical analysis will be performed by intention-to-treat, and multivariate mixed effects analysis will be used to compare results. DISCUSSION: Activities in the context of telerehabilitation using PFMT and self-care can represent a viable and effective solution to minimize the side effects of gynecological cancer treatment and improve women's quality of life.

Sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary and defecatory disorders: experience in a Latin American public hospital.

Objective: To show the experience of a Latin American public hospital, with SNM in the management of either OAB, NOUR or FI, reporting feasibility, short to medium-term success rates, and complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort was conducted using data collected prospectively from patients with urogynecological conditions and referred from colorectal surgery and urology services between 2015 and 2022. Results: Advanced or basic trial phases were performed on 35 patients, 33 (94%) of which were successful and opted to move on Implantable Pulse Generator (GG) implantation. The average follow-up time after definitive implantation was 82 months (SD 59). Of the 33 patients undergoing, 27 (81%)reported an improvement of 50% or more in their symptoms at last follow-up. Moreover, 30 patients (90%) with a definitive implant reported subjective improvement, with an average PGI-I "much better" and 9 of them reporting to be "excellent" on PGI-I. Conclusion: SNM is a feasible and effective treatment for pelvic floor dysfunction. Its implementation requires highly trained groups and innovative leadership. At a nation-wide level, greater diffusion of this therapy among professionals is needed to achieve timely referral of patients who require it.

Restriction of Surgical Options for Pelvic Floor Disorders.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this document is to update the 2013 AUGS Position Statement based on subsequent decisions made by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, published clinical data, and relevant society and national guidelines related to the use of surgical mesh. Urogynecologists specialize in treating pelvic floor disorders, such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence, and have been actively involved and engaged in the national and international discussions and research on the use of surgical mesh in the treatment of POP and stress urinary incontinence. In 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered manufacturers of transvaginally placed mesh kits for prolapse to stop selling and distributing their devices, stating that the data submitted did not provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Evidence supports the use of mesh in synthetic midurethral sling and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. The American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) remains opposed to any restrictions that ban currently available surgical options performed by qualified and credentialed surgeons on appropriately informed patients with pelvic floor disorders. The AUGS supports the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's recommendations that surgeons thoroughly inform patients seeking treatment for POP about the risks and benefits of all potential treatment options, including nonsurgical options, native tissue vaginal repairs, or abdominally placed mesh. There are certain clinical situations where surgeons may assert that the use and potential benefit of transvaginal mesh for prolapse outweighs the risk of other routes/types of surgery or of not using mesh. The AUGS recommends that surgeons utilize a shared decision-making model in the decision-making process regarding surgical options, including use of transvaginally placed mesh.

Short-Term Outcomes After Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer/EIN With Concomitant Pelvic Floor Disorder Surgery.

IMPORTANCE: Endometrial cancer and precancer are common gynecologic problems for many women. A majority of these patients require surgery as the mainstay of treatment. Many of these patients often have concurrent pelvic floor disorders. Despite the prevalence and shared risk, fewer than 3% of women undergo concomitant surgery for PFDs at the time of surgery for endometrial cancer or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/hyperplasia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate postoperative morbidity of concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or urinary incontinence (UI) procedures at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (EC) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/endometrial hyperplasia (EIN/EH). METHODS: This retrospective analysis of women undergoing hysterectomy for EC or EIN/EH between 2017 and 2022 used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The primary outcome was any major complication within 30 days of surgery. Comparisons were made between 2 cohorts: hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence procedures (POPUI) versus hysterectomy without concomitant POP or UI procedures (HYSTAlone). A subgroup analysis was performed in patients with EC. A propensity score matching cohort was also created. RESULTS: A total of 23,144 patients underwent hysterectomy for EC or EIN/EH: 1.9% (n = 432) had POP and/or UI procedures. Patients with POPUI were older, were predominantly White, had higher parity, and had lower body mass index with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Patients with POPUI were less likely to have EC (65.7% vs 78.3%, P < 0.0001) and more likely to have their hysterectomy performed by a general obstetrician- gynecologists or urogynecologists. Major complications were low and not significantly different between POPUI and HYSTAlone (3.7% vs 3.6%, P = 0.094). A subgroup analysis of EC alone found that the HYSTAlone subset did not have more advanced cancers, yet the surgeon was more likely a gynecologic oncologist (87.1% vs 68.0%, P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts for the primary and secondary outcomes using propensity score matching analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant prolapse and/or incontinence procedures were uncommon and did not increase the rate of 30-day major complications for women undergoing hysterectomy for EC/EH.

Psychosexological correlates of 372 women with vulvodynia, overactive pelvic floor, postcoital cystitis, and interstitial cystitis.

BACKGROUND: Among the plethora of urogynecological conditions possibly affecting women, some of them, less explored, have significant impacts on sexological and psychological health, with a mutual influence. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the sexological and psychological correlates of four urogynecological pathologies in a sample of women of childbearing age: overactive pelvic floor, vulvodynia, postcoital cystitis, and interstitial cystitis. Women cured of these conditions were also included, to assess the same aspects after the remission of physical symptoms. METHODS: We recruited 372 women with an average age of 33.5 years through an online platform shared by a popular forum for women with urogynecological pathologies between March and May 2021. The participants filled out a socio-anamnestic questionnaire and a set of psychometric tests. OUTCOMES: Participant data were collected by use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, Female Sexual Function Index, and Orgasmometer-F, and the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) v.26 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Overactive pelvic floor was reported by 66.4% of the women, vulvodynia by 55%, postcoital cystitis by 58.8%, and interstitial cystitis by 8.3%, and these conditions were often comorbid with each other, with 9.4% and 7% of women reporting having suffered psychological and sexual abuse, respectively. The presence of past abuse was correlated with overactive pelvic floor (P < .05), vulvodynia (P < .01), and major depression (P < .01). Significantly more depression occurred in women with vulvodynia than in the other subgroups (P < .05), except for women with only an overactive pelvic floor. There was no difference between the subgroups in the occurrence of alexithymia, sexual function, and orgasm (P < .05). Interestingly, the prevalence of sexual dysfunction increased in cured women. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The lack of significant differences, except for depression, between the pathological subgroups suggests a similar clinical and psychological relevance of the four pathologies studied. The persistence of sexual dysfunctions in cured women may be related to a residual dysfunctional relational modality with the partner. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The evaluation of both psychological and sexological variables in a group of less-explored urogynecological conditions represents a strength of this study, while a lack of a face-to-face assessment could represent a limitation. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study should promote psychosexological interventions in women with these diseases, both during the pathological state and after remission.

Pelvic Floor Therapy and Initial Interventions for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Gynecologic Malignancies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides evidence-based updates for the first-line management approaches for pelvic floor disorders in patients with gynecologic malignancies, as well as important provider considerations when referring for pelvic floor physical therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, there is strong evidence to recommend pelvic floor muscle training as initial treatment for urinary incontinence and for pelvic organ prolapse; some evidence to recommend a more targeted pelvic floor muscle training program for fecal incontinence; and mostly expertise-based evidence to recommend vaginal gels or estrogen to aid with dyspareunia causing sexual dysfunction. More research is greatly needed to understand the role of overactive pelvic floor muscles in survivors with chronic pelvic pain and the treatment of post-radiation pelvic complications such as vaginal stenosis and cystitis. While pelvic floor disorders are common concerns in gynecologic cancer survivors, there are evidence-based initial noninvasive treatment approaches that can provide relief for many individuals.

Pelvic floor injury during vaginal birth is life-altering and preventable: what can we do about it?

Pelvic floor disorders after childbirth have distressing lifelong consequences for women, requiring more than 300,000 women to have surgery annually. This represents approximately 10% of the 3 million women who give birth vaginally each year. Vaginal birth is the largest modifiable risk factor for prolapse, the pelvic floor disorder most strongly associated with birth, and is an important contributor to stress incontinence. These disorders require 10 times as many operations as anal sphincter injuries. Imaging shows that injuries of the levator ani muscle, perineal body, and membrane occur in up to 19% of primiparous women. During birth, the levator muscle and birth canal tissues must stretch to more than 3 times their original length; it is this overstretching that is responsible for the muscle tear visible on imaging rather than compression or neuropathy. The injury is present in 55% of women with prolapse later in life, with an odds ratio of 7.3, compared with women with normal support. In addition, levator damage can affect other aspects of hiatal closure, such as the perineal body and membrane. These injuries are associated with an enlarged urogenital hiatus, now known as antedate prolapse, and with prolapse surgery failure. Risk factors for levator injury are multifactorial and include forceps delivery, occiput posterior birth, older maternal age, long second stage of labor, and birthweight of >4000 g. Delivery with a vacuum device is associated with reduced levator damage. Other steps that might logically reduce injuries include manual rotation from occiput posterior to occiput anterior, slow gradual delivery, perineal massage or compresses, and early induction of labor, but these require study to document protection. In addition, teaching women to avoid pushing against a contracted levator muscle would likely decrease injury risk by decreasing tension on the vulnerable muscle origin. Providing care for women who have experienced difficult deliveries can be enhanced with early recognition, physical therapy, and attention to recovery. It is only right that women be made aware of these risks during pregnancy. Educating women on the long-term pelvic floor sequelae of childbirth should be performed antenatally so that they can be empowered to make informed decisions about management decisions during labor.

The causal effect of reproductive factors on pelvic floor dysfunction: a Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is an extremely widespread urogynecologic disorder, the prevalence of which increases with aging. PFD has severely affected women's quality of life and has been called a social cancer. While previous studies have identified risk factors such as vaginal delivery and obesity for PFD, other reproductive factors, including age at menarche (AAMA), have been largely overlooked. Therefore, we used a Mendelian randomization (MR) study for the first time to investigate the potential causal relationship between reproductive factors and PFD. METHODS: We obtained summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for female genital prolapse (FGP), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and five reproductive factors. Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis (TSMR) was performed to explore the causal associations between these factors. The causal effects of reproductive factors on FGP and SUI were primarily estimated using the standard inverse variance weighting (IVW) method, with additional complementary and sensitivity analyses conducted using multiple approaches. A multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) study was also conducted to adjust for pleiotropic effects and possible sources of selection bias and to identify independent exposure factors. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that advanced age at first sexual intercourse (AFS) and age at first birth (AFB) exhibited negative causal effects on both FGP and SUI. AAMA showed negative causal effects solely on FGP, while age at last live birth (ALB) and age at menopause (AAMO) did not demonstrate any causal effect on either FGP or SUI. And the MVMR results showed that AFB and AFS had independent negative causal effects on FGP and SUI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study, for the first time, investigates the causal relationship between reproductive factors and PFD. The results suggested a causal relationship between some reproductive factors, such as AFB and AFS, and PFD, but there were significant differences between FGPand SUI. Therefore, future studies should explore the underlying mechanisms and develop preventive measures for reproductive factors to reduce the disease burden of PFD.

Influence of pelvic floor disorders on sexuality in women.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between different pelvic floor disorders and the presence of sexual dysfunction in women. METHOD: An observational study of non-pregnant women was carried out in Spain in 2021 and 2022. To assess the presence of pelvic floor problems, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) was used, consisting of the subscales Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6; prolapse symptoms), Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8; colorectal symptoms), and Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6; urinary symptoms). The validated tool, Female Sexual Function (FSF), was used to evaluate female sexual function. RESULTS: In total, 1008 women participated. Of these, 288 (28.6%) had some type of sexual dysfunction. Regarding symptoms, 52 (5.2%) stated that they do not reach orgasm and 172 (17.1%) said they had never or occasionally felt sexual desire in the last month. Women with sexual dysfunctions had higher mean scores on the POPDI-6, CRADI-8, and UDI-6 subscales than those who did not have sexual dysfunction (P ≤ 0.005). Risk factors identified included being postmenopausal, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-4.18), and a greater impact of the symptoms of pelvic floor problems as assessed by the PFDI-20 scale, in such a way that for each point increase the probability of sexual dysfunction increases with an aOR of 1.008 (95% CI 1.005-1.011). CONCLUSION: Women with pelvic floor disorders and postmenopausal women present sexual dysfunction more frequently.

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) typically undergo surgery involving transvaginal mesh implants; however, transvaginal mesh surgery is associated with many adverse events including post-surgical pain. Assessment of pain as a symptom is necessary using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This scoping review aimed to describe and compare existing PROMs previously used to measure pain in women with PFDs. A scoping search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Ovid PsycInfo, and grey literature was conducted. Studies published in English describing the development, implementation, and application of PFD-associated pain PROMs among adult women before and after pelvic floor surgery were included. From each article, a descriptive summary organised by study first author, publication year, country, setting, aim, study characteristics, and results were extracted. From 2,604 articles identified, 54 studies were included, describing 44 PROMs. Most studies described at least 2 to 3 instruments. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 was most commonly described by 12 studies followed by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Of the 44 PROMs, 27 were condition-specific, of which 9 included items on pain; 17 generic PROMs, 4 of which contained items on pain; and 6 pain-specific PROMs. PROMs identified in our review measured pain not related to PFDs or pelvic floor surgery and quantified the pain experienced. These PROMs did not measure all areas of pain including region, sensation, impact, and triggers. The findings of this review will assist with developing a new pain-specific PROM in this population. PERSPECTIVE: Women with pelvic floor disorders often undergo surgery involving transvaginal mesh, from which they experience debilitating pain. Pain is a major issue impacting women's lives. Patient-reported outcome measures can be used to assess the pain; however, it is unclear whether existing instruments are relevant.

Influence of pelvic floor disorders on quality of life in women.

Objective: To determine whether the different pelvic floor disorders are associated with changes in perceived quality of life (QoL), globally and in its sub-dimensions. Methods: An observational study was conducted with women in Spain between 2021 and 2022. Information was collected using a self-developed questionnaire on sociodemographic data, employment, history and health status, lifestyle and habits, obstetric history, and health problems. The SF-12 questionnaire was used to assess quality of life. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) was used to assess the presence and impact of pelvic floor problems, and includes the POPDI-6 subscales for prolapse, CRADI- 8 for colorectal symptoms, and UDI-6 for urinary symptoms. Crude (MD) and adjusted mean differences (aMD) were estimated with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Thousand four hundred and forty six women participated in the study with a mean age of 44.27 (SD = 14.68). A statistical association was observed between all the pelvic floor disorders and QoL, overall and in all its dimensions (p <0.001), in the bivariable analysis. The lowest scores were observed in the emotional component. After adjusting for confounding factors, the pelvic floor disorders in general (aMD -0.21, 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.20), the impact of uterine prolapse symptoms (aMD -0.20, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.12), the colorectal-anal symptoms (aMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.22 to -0.09), and urinary symptoms (aMD -0.07, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.03) was negatively associated on the score on the SF-12 questionnaire (p <0.05). Conclusions: Women who have a pelvic floor dysfunction, symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, colorectal-anal symptoms, or urinary symptoms, have a worse perceived quality of life in all dimensions. Prolapse symptoms have the biggest impact, and the emotional component of QoL is the most affected sub-domains.

Effect of Surgically Induced Weight Loss on Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery alleviates certain aspects of pelvic floor disorder, but the effect on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is unclear. To assess the effect of bariatric surgery on POP we conducted the present meta-analysis and firstly performed a subgroup analysis based on the duration of follow-up. METHODS: Four databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to identify relevant studies published before February 24, 2023. The main outcome was the prevalence and severity of POP symptoms before and after bariatric surgery. Then we assessed the heterogeneity, publication bias and performed subgroup analyses based on follow-up time, study quality and region. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 696 participants met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that the prevalence of POP decreased after bariatric surgery (odds ratio[OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.05, 5.01; P = 0.04, I2 = 78%), with significant differences observed both at 3-6 months (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.25, 4.01; P = 0.007, I2 = 59%) and 12 months (OR = 4.64, 95% CI: 2.83, 7.58; P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) of follow-up compared with pre-surgery. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores 6-item also decreased after bariatric surgery (mean difference [MD] = 2.11, 95% CI: 0.32, 3.89; P = 0.02, I2 = 55%) with significant differences observed both at 3-6 months (MD = 3.72; 95% CI: [0.10, 7.34], P = 0.04, I2 = 70%) and ≥ 12 months (MD = 3.24; 95% CI: [0.56, 5.91], P = 0.02, I2 = 56%) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery alleviated POP symptoms in women with obesity both during short-term (3-6 months) and long-term (≥ 12 months) follow-up.

Pelvic floor dysfunction after colorectal cancer treatment is related to physical and psychological health and body image: A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) often occurs in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), which can affect their quality of life. However, the precise factors that related to PFD in CRC patients remain elusive. The main objective of this study was to identify the variables associated with PFD following CRC treatment and establish a foundation for the development of a tailored rehabilitation plan specific to this population. METHODS: The classification of 149 patients with CRC was conducted according to the type of medical treatment they underwent. PFD was evaluated using the Urogenital Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6) and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8 (CRADI-8) questionnaires. The study employed the Short form 36 health survey (SF-36) and Body Image Scale (BIS) to evaluate physical and psychological health as well as body image disorders. The connection between PFD and independent variables was determined through logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of all patients, more than 50% reported experiencing dysfunction, with the highest proportion observed in the PRT (primary radiotherapy) group. The LRR/RR (robotic-assisted colorectal resection or laparoscopic colorectal resection) group revealed a significant association between high BMI (Body Mass Index) and alcohol consumption with PFD. Moreover, in the PRT group, PFD was correlated with poorer physical condition (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = [0.88-1.00]). CONCLUSIONS: PFD is a commonly complained-about issue among patients with CRC. Early intervention targeted towards these factors may aid in the alleviation of associated distress and contribute towards the individualization of CRC rehabilitation programs, consequently improving the quality of life for patients.

[Imaging of the pelvic floor (MR defecography) : The surgeon's perspective]. / Bildgebung des Beckenbodens (MR-Defäkographie) : Die Sicht der Chirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) plays a central role in diagnosing pelvic floor functional disorders by visualizing the entire pelvic floor along with pelvic organs and providing functional assessment of the defecation process. A shared understanding between radiology and surgery regarding indications and interpretation of findings is crucial for optimal utilization of MRD. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to explain the indications for MRD from a surgical perspective and elucidate the significance of radiological findings for treatment. It intends to clarify for which symptoms MRD is appropriate and which criteria should be followed for standardized results. This is prerequisite to develop interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including current consensus guidelines. RESULTS: MRD can provide relevant findings in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation syndrome, particularly in cases of pelvic floor descent, enterocele, intussusception, and pelvic floor dyssynergia. However, rectocele findings in MRD should be interpreted with caution in order to avoid overdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: MRD findings should never be considered in isolation but rather in conjunction with patient history, clinical examination, and symptomatology since morphology and functional complaints may not always correlate, and there is wide variance of normal values. Interdisciplinary interpretation of MRD results involving radiology, surgery, gynecology, and urology, preferably in the context of pelvic floor conferences, is recommended.

Twelve Month Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Patients With Uterovaginal or Posthysterectomy Vaginal Prolapse Enrolled in the Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare 12-month subjective and objective outcomes between 3 approaches to apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients presenting with uterovaginal or posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse enrolled in the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research. STUDY DESIGN: This was an analysis of a multicenter, prospective registry that collected both patient- and physician-reported data for up to 3 years after conservative (pessary) and surgical treatment for POP. Twelve-month subjective and anatomic outcomes for patients who underwent surgical treatment were extracted from the registry for analysis. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence was defined as a composite outcome and compared between the 3 apical surgery groups (native tissue repair, sacrocolpopexy, colpocleisis) as well as the 2 reconstructive surgery groups (native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy). RESULTS: A total of 1,153 women were enrolled in the registry and 777 (67%) opted for surgical treatment, of whom 641 underwent apical repair and were included in this analysis (404 native tissue repair, 187 sacrocolpopexy, and 50 colpocleisis). The overall incidence of recurrence was as follows: subjective 6.5%, anatomic 4.7%, retreatment 7.2%, and composite 13.6%. The incidence of recurrence was not different between the 3 surgical groups. When baseline patient characteristics were controlled for, composite POP recurrence between the native tissue and sacrocolpopexy groups remained statistically nonsignificant. Concurrent perineorrhaphy with any type of apical POP surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.74; P = 0.002) and prior hysterectomy was associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.03; P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research participants undergoing native tissue apical POP repair, sacrocolpopexy, and colpocleisis surgery had similar rates of POP recurrence 12 months after surgery.

Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic floor disorders better than laparoscopic approach at the beginning of the experience? A retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative results of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic floor disorders at the beginning of the surgical experience. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2022, the first 30 laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexies and the first 30 robotic ventral mesh rectopexies at the beginning of the experience of 2 surgeons were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative (demographic characteristics, surgical indication, conversion rate, operative time), and postoperative (complications, length of stay, unplanned reintervention) data were compared between groups. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Conversion rate was lower (0 vs 17%, p = 0.05), but the operative time was significantly longer (182 [146-290] vs 150 [75-240] minutes, p < 0.0001) during robotic procedure when compared with laparoscopic approach. In terms of learning curve, the number of procedures to obtain the same operative time between the 2 approaches was 15. Postoperative results were similar between groups, in terms of pain (visual analogic scale = 2 [0-8] vs 4 [0-9], p = 0.07), morbidity (17 vs 3%, p = 0.2), and unplanned reintervention (1 vs 0%, p = 0.99). Mean length of stay was significantly reduced after robotic approach when compared with laparoscopic approach (3 [2-10] vs 5 [2-11] days, p < 0.01). Functional results were better after robotic than laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, with higher satisfaction rate (93 vs 75%, p = 0.05), and reduced recurrence rate (0 vs 14%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Despite longer operative time at the beginning of the learning curve, robotic ventral mesh rectopexy was associated with similar or better perioperative results than laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Pelvic floor imaging in asymptomatic subjects.

AIM: The aim of this work was to determine the range of normal imaging features during total pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFUS) (transperineal, transvaginal, endovaginal and endoanal) and defaecation MRI (dMRI). METHOD: Twenty asymptomatic female volunteers (mean age 36.5 years) were prospectively investigated with dMRI and TPFUS. Subjects were screened with symptom questionnaires (ICIQ-B, St Mark's faecal incontinence score, obstructed defaecation syndrome score, ICIQ-V, BSAQ). dMRI and TPFUS were performed and interpreted by blinded clinicians according to previously published methods. RESULTS: The subjects comprised six parous and 14 nulliparous women, of whom three were postmenopausal. There were three with a rectocoele on both modalities and one with a rectocoele on dMRI only. There was one with intussusception on TPFUS. Two had an enterocoele on both modalities and one on TPFUS only. There were six with a cystocoele on both modalities, one on dMRI only and one on TPFUS only. On dMRI, there were 12 with functional features. Four also displayed functional features on TPFUS. Two displayed functional features on TPFUS only. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the presence of abnormal findings on dMRI and TPFUS without symptoms. There was a high rate of functional features on dMRI. This series is not large enough to redefine normal parameters but is helpful for appreciating the wide range of findings seen in health.

The influence of defaecating proctograms on clinical decision-making in pelvic floor disorders.

AIM: Defaecating proctogram (DP) studies have become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor disorders. However, their impact on treatment decision-making remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of decision-making by colorectal surgeons and the role of the DP in this process. METHOD: Four colorectal surgeons were presented with online surveys containing the complete history, examination and investigations of 106 de-identified pelvic floor patients who had received one of three treatment options: physiotherapy only, anterior Delorme's procedure or anterior mesh rectopexy. The survey assessed the management decisions made by each of the surgeons for the three treatments both before and after the addition of the DP to the diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: After the addition of the DP results; treatment choice changed in 219 (52%) of 424 surgical decisions and interrater agreement improved significantly from κ = 0.26 to κ = 0.39. Three of the four surgeons reported a significant increase in confidence. Agreement with the actual treatments patients received increased from κ = 0.21 to κ = 0.28. Intra-anal rectal prolapse on DP was a significant predictor of a decision to perform anterior mesh rectopexy. CONCLUSION: The DP improves interclinician agreement in the management of pelvic floor disorders and enhances the confidence in treatment decisions. Intra-anal rectal prolapse was the most influential DP parameter in treatment decision-making.