Diagnosis and Management of Macrosomia and Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines.

Importance: Macrosomia represents the most significant risk factor of shoulder dystocia (SD), which is a severe and emergent complication of vaginal delivery. They are both associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published influential guidelines on the diagnosis and management of fetal macrosomia and SD. Evidence Acquisition: A comparative review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), and the Department for Health and Wellbeing of the Government of South Australia on macrosomia and SD was conducted. Results: The ACOG and RANZCOG agree that macrosomia should be defined as birthweight above 4000-4500 g regardless of the gestational age, whereas the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence defines macrosomia as an estimated fetal weight above the 95th percentile. According to ACOG and RANZCOG, ultrasound scans and clinical estimates can be used to rule out fetal macrosomia, although lacking accuracy. Routine induction of labor before 39 weeks of gestation with the sole indication of suspected fetal macrosomia is unanimously not recommended, but an individualized counseling should be provided. Exercise, appropriate diet, and prepregnancy bariatric surgery are mentioned as preventive measures. There is also consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the definition and the diagnosis of SD, with the "turtle sign" being the most common sign for its recognition as well as the poor predictability of the reported risk factors. Moreover, there is an overall agreement on the algorithm of SD management with McRoberts technique suggested as first-line maneuver. In addition, appropriate staff training, thorough documentation, and time keeping are crucial aspects of SD management according to all medical societies. Elective delivery for the prevention of SD is discouraged by all the reviewed guidelines. Conclusions: Macrosomia is associated not only with SD but also with maternal and neonatal complications. Similarly, SD can lead to permanent neurologic sequalae, as well as perinatal death if managed in a suboptimal way. Therefore, it is crucial to develop consistent international practice protocols for their prompt diagnosis and effective management in order to safely guide clinical practice and improve pregnancy outcomes.

Prevalence of macrosomic newborn and maternal and neonatal complications in a high-risk maternity

Abstract Objective Evaluate the prevalence of macrosomic newborns (birth weight above 4000 grams) in a high-risk maternity from 2014 to 2019, as well as the maternal characteristics involved, risk factors, mode of delivery and associated outcomes, comparing newborns weighing 4000-4500 grams and those weighing above 4500 grams. Methods This is an observational study, case-control type, carried out by searching for data in hospital's own system and clinical records. The criteria for inclusion in the study were all patients monitored at the service who had newborns with birth weight equal than or greater than 4000 grams in the period from January 2014 to December 2019, being subsequently divided into two subgroups (newborns with 4000 to 4500 grams and newborns above 4500 grams). After being collected, the variables were transcribed into a database, arranged in frequency tables. For treatment and statistical analysis of the data, Excel and R software were used. This tool was used to create graphs and tables that helped in the interpretation of the results. The statistical analysis of the variables collected included both simple descriptive analyzes as well as inferential statistics, with univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results From 2014 to 2019, 3.3% of deliveries were macrosomic newborns. The average gestational age in the birth was 39.4 weeks. The most common mode of delivery (65%) was cesarean section. Diabetes mellitus was present in 30% of the deliveries studied and glycemic control was absent in most patients. Among the vaginal deliveries, only 6% were instrumented and there was shoulder dystocia in 21% of the cases. The majority (62%) of newborns had some complication, with jaundice (35%) being the most common. Conclusion Birth weight above 4000 grams had a statistically significant impact on the occurrence of neonatal complications, such as hypoglycemia, respiratory distress and 5th minute APGAR less than 7, especially if birth weight was above 4500 grams. Gestational age was also shown to be statistically significant associated with neonatal complications, the lower, the greater the risk. Thus, macrosomia is strongly linked to complications, especially neonatal complications.

Treatment of Chiari III Malformation in Infant with 4K 3D ORBEYE Exoscope.

Chiari malformation (CM)-III is the rarest anomaly among CMs.1 Treatment of choice is surgical repair,2 although poor outcome and postoperative mortality has been reported.3 Surgical timing is still debated.4,5 We present the case of a male infant with a prenatal diagnosis of encephalocele. Presentation was characterized by hemodynamic instability, horizontal nystagmus, and left shoulder dystocia due to caesarean section, with a 64 mm × 49 mm × 76 mm soft, fluctuant, and translucent suboccipital-cervical sac. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a median occipital bone defect with the meningoencephalic sac communicating with the vermian cistern and the fourth ventricle, moderate hydrocephalus, reduction of the posterior cranial fossa volume, hypoplasia of cerebellar hemispheric, vermian structures, and corpus callosum hypoplasia. The patient underwent surgery on day 4 with the use of a 4K 3D ORBEYE exoscope (Video 1). Surgery consisted of disengagement of nervous structures and repair of the neurocutaneous defect, followed on day 12 by a ventriculoperitoneal shunt with a programmable valve. The procedures were well tolerated. At the 14-month follow-up visit he was in range with growth charts (weight, height, and cranic circumference) and gained the physiologic stages of growth. He had no motor impairment but still present were convergent strabismus and mild left C5-C6 radiculopathy, secondary to shoulder dystocia. This is the first case reported in the literature of CM-III treated with the 4K 3D ORBEYE exoscope. Advantages of the exoscope were ergonomic positions for operative staff, possibility for the team to assist in the 4K 3D view, especially in cases with a narrow operative field, with a clear and detailed vision, although a learning curve is required6 to become a valid alternative in pediatric neurosurgery.

How common is substandard obstetric care in adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage? Findings from an external inspection of Norwegian maternity units.

INTRODUCTION: The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision inspects healthcare institutions to ensure safety and quality of health and welfare services. A planned inspection of 12 maternity units aimed to investigate the practice of obstetric care in the case of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and severe postpartum hemorrhage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The inspection was carried out at two large, four medium and six small maternity units in Norway in 2016 to investigate adverse events that occurred between 1 January and 31 December 2014. Six of them were selected as control units. The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision searched the Medical Birth Registry of Norway to identify adverse events in each of the categories and then requested access to the medical records for all patients identified. Information about guidelines, formal teaching and simulation training at each unit was obtained by sending a questionnaire to the obstetrician in charge of each maternity unit. RESULTS: The obstetric units inspected had 553 serious adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia or severe postpartum hemorrhage among 17 323 deliveries. Twenty-nine events were excluded from further analysis due to erroneous coding or missing data in the patients' medical records. We included 524 cases (3.0% of all deliveries) of adverse events in the final analysis. Medical errors caused by substandard care were present in 295 (56.2%) cases. There was no difference in the prevalence of substandard care among the maternity units according to their size. Surprisingly, we found significantly fewer cases with substandard care in the units which the supervisory authorities considered particularly risky before the inspection, compared with the control units. Seven of the 12 units had regular formal teaching and training arrangements for obstetric healthcare personnel as outlined in the national guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of adverse events was 3% and similar in all maternity units irrespective of their size. A breach in the standard of care was observed in 56.2% of cases and almost half of the maternity units did not follow national recommendations regarding teaching and practical training of obstetric personnel, suggesting that they should focus on implementing guidelines and training their staff.

Multi-professional simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based obstetric team training focuses on building a system that will anticipate errors, improve patient outcomes and the performance of clinical care teams. Simulation-based obstetric team training has been proposed as a tool to improve the overall outcome of obstetric health care. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of simulation-based obstetric team training on patient outcomes, performance of obstetric care teams in practice and educational settings, and trainees' experience. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were searched (14 April 2020), together with references checking and hand searching the available proceedings of 2 international conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cluster-randomised trials) comparing simulation-based obstetric team training with no, or other type of training. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane, to identify articles, assess methodological quality and extract data. Data from three cluster-randomised trials could be used to perform generic inverse variance meta-analyses. The meta-analyses were based on risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of the evidence. We used Kirkpatrick's model of training evaluation to categorise the outcomes of interest; we chose Level 3 (behavioural change) and Level 4 (patient outcome) to categorise the primary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight RCTs, six of which were cluster-randomised trials, involving more than 1000 training participants and more than 200,000 pregnancies/births. Four studies reported on outcome measures on Kirkpatrick level 4 (patient outcome), three studies on Kirkpatrick level 3 (performance in practice), two studies on Kitkpatrick level 2 (performance in educational settings), and none on Kirkpatrick level 1 (trainees' experience). The included studies were from Mexico, the Netherlands, the UK and the USA, all middle- and high-income countries. Kirkpatrick level 4 (patient outcome) Simulation-based obstetric team training may make little or no difference for composite outcomes of maternal and/or perinatal adverse events compared with no training (3 studies; n = 28,731, low-certainty evidence, data not pooled due to different composite outcome definitions). We are uncertain whether simulation-based obstetric team training affects maternal mortality compared with no training (2 studies; 79,246 women; very low-certainty evidence). However, it may reduce neonatal mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.01; 2 studies, 79,246 pregnancies/births, low-certainty evidence). Simulation-based obstetric team training may have little to no effect on low Apgar score compared with no training (RR 0.99, 95% 0.85 to 1.15; 2 studies; 115,171 infants; low-certainty evidence), but it probably reduces trauma after shoulder dystocia (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.99; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably slightly reduces the number of caesarean deliveries (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.93; 1 study; n = 50,589; moderate-certainty evidence) Kirkpatrick level 3 (performance in practice) We found that simulation-based obstetric team training probably improves the performance of the obstetric teams in practice, compared with no training (3 studies; 2398 obstetric staff members, moderate-certainty evidence, data not pooled due to different outcome definitions). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based obstetric team training may help to improve team performance of obstetric teams, and it might contribute to improvement of specific maternal and perinatal outcomes, compared with no training. However, high-certainty evidence is lacking due to serious risk of bias and imprecision, and the effect cannot be generalised for all outcomes. Future studies investigating simulation-based obstetric team training compared to training courses with a different instructional design should carefully consider how and when to measure outcomes. Particular attention should be paid to effect measurement at the level of patient outcome, taking into consideration the low incidence of adverse maternal and perinatal events.

Obstetric Paralysis: Who is to blame? A systematic literature review / Paralisia obstétrica: De quem é a culpa? Uma revisão sistemática de literatura

Abstract Obstetric palsy is classically defined as the brachial plexus injury due to shoulder dystocia or to maneuvers performed on difficult childbirths. In the last 2 decades, several studies have shown that half of the cases of Obstetric palsy are not associated with shoulder dystocia and have raised other possible etiologies for Obstetric palsy. The purpose of the present study is to collect data from literature reviews, classic articles, sentries, and evidence-based medicine to better understand the events involved in the occurrence of Obstetric palsy. A literature review was conducted in the search engine PubMed (MeSH - Medical Subject Headings) with the following keywords: shoulder dystocia and obstetric palsy, completely open, boundless regarding language or date. Later, the inclusion criterion was defined as revisions. A total of 21 review articles associated with the themes described were found until March 8, 2018. Faced with the best available evidence to date, it is well-demonstrated that Obstetric palsy occurs in uncomplicated deliveries and in cesarean deliveries, and there are multiple factors that can cause it, relativizing the responsibility of obstetricians, nurses, and midwives. The present study aims to break the paradigms that associate Obstetric palsy compulsorily with shoulder dystocia, and that its occurrence necessarily implies negligence, malpractice or recklessness of the team involved.

Resumo A paralisia obstétrica é classicamente definida como a lesão do plexo braquial decorrente da distócia de ombros ou das manobras executadas no parto difícil. Nas 2 últimas décadas, vários estudos comprovaram que metade dos casos de paralisia obstétrica não estão associados à distócia de ombros e levantaram outras possíveis etiologias para a paralisia obstétrica. O objetivo do presente trabalho é colher dados da literatura de revisão, artigos clássicos, sentinelas e da medicina baseada em evidências para compreender melhor os eventos envolvidos na ocorrência de paralisia obstétrica. Foi realizada uma revisão da literatura no motor de busca da PubMed (MeSH - Medical Subject Headings) com as seguintes palavras-chave: shoulder dystocia and obstetric palsy, completamente aberto, sem limites de língua ou data. Posteriormente, definimos como critério de inclusão artigos de revisão. Encontramos 21 artigos de revisão com associação dos temas descritos até 8 de março de 2018. Frente às melhores evidências existentes até o momento, está bem demonstrado que a paralisia obstétrica ocorre em partos não complicados e em partos cesáreos, e são múltiplos os fatores que podem causá-la, relativizando a responsabilidade de médicos obstetras, enfermeiras e parteiras. Procuramos, com o presente estudo, quebrar os paradigmas de que paralisia obstétrica se associa obrigatoriamente à distócia de ombros e que a sua ocorrência necessariamente implica em negligência, imperícia ou imprudência da equipe envolvida.

The Association of Clavicle Fracture With Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy.

PURPOSE: Shoulder dystocia is the strongest known risk factor for brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP). Fractures of the clavicle are known to occur in the setting of shoulder dystocia. It remains unknown whether a clavicle fracture that occurs during a birth delivery with shoulder dystocia increases the risk of BPBP or, alternatively, is protective. The purpose of this study was to use a large, national database to determine whether a clavicle fracture in the setting of shoulder dystocia is associated with an increased or decreased risk of BPBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1997 to 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was analyzed for this study. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes were used to identify newborns diagnosed with shoulder dystocia and BPBP as well as a concurrent fracture of the clavicle. Newborns with shoulder dystocia were stratified into 2 groups: dystocia without a clavicle fracture and dystocia with a clavicle fracture. Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify the risk for BPBP among shoulder dystocia subgroups. RESULTS: The dataset included 5,564,628 sample births extrapolated to 23,385,597 population births over the 16-year study period. A BPBP occurred at a rate of 1.2 per 1,000 births. Shoulder dystocia complicated 18.8% of births with a BPBP. A total of 7.84% of newborns with a BPBP also sustained a clavicle fracture. Births with shoulder dystocia and a clavicle fracture incurred BPBP at a rate similar to that for newborns with shoulder dystocia and no fracture (9.82% vs 11.77%). Shoulder dystocia without a concurrent clavicle fracture was an independent risk factor for BPBP (odds ratio, 112.1; 95% confidence interval, 103.5-121.4). Those with shoulder dystocia and clavicle fracture had a risk for BPBP comparable with those with shoulder dystocia but no fracture (odds ratio, 126.7 vs 112.1). CONCLUSIONS: This population-level investigation suggests that, among newborns with shoulder dystocia, clavicle fracture is not associated with a significant change in the risk of BPBP. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Assessment of Current Epidemiology and Risk Factors Surrounding Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) is common; however, the current incidence is unknown and more than 50% of infants with BPBP have no known risk factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the current incidence of BPBP, assess known risk factors, and evaluate hypotonia as a new risk factor, as well as estimate the length of stay (LOS) and direct costs of children with an associated BPBP injury. METHODS: Data from the 1997 to 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database data sets were evaluated to identify patients with a BPBP injury and various risk factors. Evaluation of LOS data and direct costs was also performed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to assess the association of BPBP with its known and previously undescribed risk factors. RESULTS: The incidence of BPBP has steadily decreased from 1997 to 2012, with an incidence of 0.9 ± 0.01 per 1,000 live births recorded in 2012. Shoulder dystocia is the number 1 risk factor for the development of a BPBP injury. Hypotonia is a newly recognized risk factor for the development of BPBP. Fifty-five percent of infants with BPBP have no known perinatal risk factors. The initial hospital LOS is approximately 20% longer for children with a BPBP injury and the hospital stay direct costs are approximately 40% higher. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BPBP is decreasing over time. Shoulder dystocia continues to be the most common risk factor for sustaining a BPBP injury. Children with a BPBP injury have longer LOSs and hospital direct costs compared with children without a BPBP injury. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Perfil clínico y resultado perinatal en pacientes conducidas con oxitocina por distocias dinámicas en el Hospital Nacional de la Mujer en el periodo de julio a septiembre de 2016 / Clinical profile and perinatal outcome in patients treated with oxytocin for dynamic dystocia at the National Women's Hospital in the period from July to September 2016

En el hospital Nacional de la Mujer como centro de tercer nivel de atención en salud, uno de sus funciones es garantizar un buen resultado materno ­ perinatal en pacientes que consultan para la atención del parto, muchas veces durante el trabajo de parto ocurren situaciones como distocias dinámicas que no permiten el adecuado progreso de este, por lo cual hace necesario la utilización de oxitocina para mejorar la actividad uterina y poder garantizar un buen resultado materno- perinatal; muchas veces el uso inadecuado de esta puede poner en riesgo la salud de la madre y el feto, interfiriendo en la vía de finalización del parto y otras complicaciones que prolonga la estancia intrahospitalaria generando gastos extras a la institución. En el presente estudio se investigó, de manera retrospectiva, a través de revisión de expedientes clínicos, los resultados maternos- fetales así como la vía de finalización del embarazo en las pacientes en las cuales se utilizó oxitocina como conducción por distocia dinámica durante el trabajo de parto. Se incluyó solo embarazos únicos y de término; dentro de los resultados se obtuvo la detención de la fase activa como principal distocia dinámica para indicación de conducción con oxitocina durante el trabajo de parto. La principal indicación de evacuación vía abdominal fue deterioro fetal; la complicación materna más frecuente fue atonía uterina, la más severa fue hemorragia obstétrica severa que resolvieron con manejo médico. La mayoría de los recién nacidos fueron niño sano