Open-angle glaucoma and Fuchs dystrophy.

A 62-year-old woman with a history of moderate myopia, long-standing open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and Fuchs dystrophy in both eyes was referred for consultative care. She had prior trabeculectomy in 1984 and 1992 in the left and right eyes, respectively. She is 3 months post-Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in the left eye, now referred with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximum tolerated medical therapy. Current medical therapy for IOP consists of acetazolamide 250 mg by mouth 2 times a day, brimonidine 2 times a day in the left eye, dorzolamide 2 times a day in the left eye, and timolol 2 times a day in the left eye. The patient has a history of presumed steroid response; however, her corneal surgeon has requested that the steroid be continued for the next several months because of the recent DSEK. The IOP in the left eye has ranged from the mid-20s to mid-30s since DSEK. The right eye has consistently had pressure in the low teens and below for many years without topical antihypertensive medications. Examination revealed stable visual acuity at 20/30 and 20/40 in the right and left eyes, respectively, IOP was 12 mm Hg in the right eye and 25 mm Hg in the left eye by Goldman applanation, irregular but reactive pupils without afferent defect, and full confrontational visual fields. Slitlamp examination showed superior low avascular bleb, moderate-to-severe guttae, and posterior chamber IOL in the right eye. The left eye showed superior low diffuse bleb, clear DSEK graft, quiet chamber, superonasal iridectomy, and posterior chamber IOL with an open posterior capsule. The conjunctiva was moderately scarred but a repeat trabeculectomy or Xen Gel stent (Abbvie) appeared possible. The angles were wide open in each eye. Fundus examination was normal aside from myopic, anomalous-appearing nerves with an approximate cup-to-disc ratio of 0.90 in both eyes. Humphrey visual field showed nonspecific changes on the right and moderate nasal defect on the left eye, stable to previous examinations dating back to 2018 (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure1/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff and Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure2/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) revealed moderated thinning in both eyes that was also stable to prior examinations (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure3/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff). Her axial length measured 25.23 and 26.34 mm in the right and left eyes, respectively. Central corneal thickness was 553 µm in the right eye and 563 µm in the left eye before her DSEK procedure. What would be your approach to management of this patient's left eye, addressing the following: Rationale for your procedure of choice? Would you over-rule the corneal surgeon and stop the steroid in an attempt to obviate the need for glaucoma surgery? Does the age of onset of glaucoma affect your surgical decision making? Note that patient age at the time of trabeculectomy was 22 years. Are some procedures better suited for patients after DSEK surgery?

Intraocular pressure-related side-effects after endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To investigate circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness, pupillary function and diameter after phacoemulsification and lens implantation alone or combined with endothelial keratoplasty (EK). METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized, single-masked trial, that included 72 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract, equally allocated (1:1) to ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. The cataract extraction (CE) group included 40 patients undergoing cataract surgery only. All patients were treated with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. RESULTS: RNFL thickness was significantly lower in the CE group than after EK for the global (p < 0.01), nasal (p = 0.04), and temporal sectors (p = 0.01) 12 months after surgery. RNFL thickness was comparable between patients treated with rebubbling and others (p ≥ 0.16 for all comparisons) after 12 months. The CE group and patients treated with EK demonstrated a comparable scotopic (p = 0.34) and photopic pupil diameter (p = 0.95) as well as a comparable maximum (p = 0.83) and average pupillary constriction velocity (p = 0.95) after 12 months. In contrast, patients treated with rebubbling had a significantly smaller scotopic pupil diameter (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this study, no evidence was found indicating a negative impact on the RNFL thickness after EK when compared to CE 12 months after surgery. Iris function and pupil diameter were comparable between the CE group and patients treated with EK after 12 months.

Double trouble in DMEK surgery: Learning experience and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To report a challenging Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) case, complicated by intraoperative aqueous misdirection and spontaneous anterior chamber fibrin reaction. METHODS: A 70-year-old female affected by corneal edema due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a triple procedure (cataract extraction - IOL implantation - DMEK surgery) in her left eye. This report illustrates the management of the intraoperative complications of aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction. RESULTS: Despite the optimal management of the posterior pressure and the thorough removal of the fibrinous reaction during the case, the DMEK graft was not completely unfolded and centred at the end of the surgical procedure. Nonetheless, the patient showed good long-term anatomical and functional recovery: at the last follow-up (2 years after surgery), central corneal thickness was 526 µm with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 and an endothelial cell density of 1112 cell/mm2. CONCLUSION: Early recognition and prompt management of intraoperative aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction during DMEK surgery is essential to ensure good functional and anatomical outcomes.

How Would Nature See Our Corneal Triumphs? The LXXIX Edward Jackson Lecture.

PURPOSE: To describe discrepancies between clinical observation and current teachings in corneal endothelial disease, particularly in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and its potential association with primary open angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Perspective. METHODS: A perspective is presented on Fuchs dystrophy, a disorder that commonly presents with a compromised endothelium but minimal stromal edema, indicating that the corneal imbibition pressure is relatively "too high." RESULTS: The discrepancy between the relative lack of stromal edema in the absence of an endothelial cell layer cannot be explained by the current theories involving a circulatory pumping mechanism over the endothelial cell layer, but may point to the following: (1) secondary involvement of the corneal endothelium in Fuchs dystrophy; (2) separate hydration systems for maintaining the imbibition pressure (vertical static hydration) and corneal nutrition (horizontal dynamic hydration); (3) the cornea as net contributor of aqueous humor; (4) a close relationship between the corneal imbibition and intraocular pressure, with potentially a shared regulatory system; and (5) a potential steroid-type hormone dependency of this regulatory system. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical observation shows that the stromal imbibition pressure is "too high" in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, indicating that it may not primarily be an endothelial disease, but a type of "corneal glaucoma."

Mitophagy: An Emerging Target in Ocular Pathology.

Mitochondrial function is essential for the viability of aerobic eukaryotic cells, as mitochondria provide energy through the generation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), regulate cellular metabolism, provide redox balancing, participate in immune signaling, and can initiate apoptosis. Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that participate in a cyclical and ongoing process of regeneration and autophagy (clearance), termed mitophagy specifically for mitochondrial (macro)autophagy. An imbalance in mitochondrial function toward mitochondrial dysfunction can be catastrophic for cells and has been characterized in several common ophthalmic diseases. In this article, we review mitochondrial homeostasis in detail, focusing on the balance of mitochondrial dynamics including the processes of fission and fusion, and provide a description of the mechanisms involved in mitophagy. Furthermore, this article reviews investigations of ocular diseases with impaired mitophagy, including Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, primary open-angle glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration, as well as several primary mitochondrial diseases with ocular phenotypes that display impaired mitophagy, including mitochondrial encephalopathy lactic acidosis stroke, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, and chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia. The results of various studies using cell culture, animal, and human tissue models are presented and reflect a growing awareness of mitophagy impairment as an important feature of ophthalmic disease pathology. As this review indicates, it is imperative that mitophagy be investigated as a targetable mechanism in developing therapies for ocular diseases characterized by oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the speed of visual recovery in 16 consecutive patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction who received Descemetstripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a novel method for smallincision endothelial transplantation (DSAEK). Endothelial replacement was accomplished with Descemet stripping of the recipient and insertion of a posterior donor tissue that had been prepared with a microkeratome. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) by manifest refraction, endothelial counts, and dislocation rates were measured up to 12 months after DSAEK. RESULTS: Sixteen consecutive patients underwent uncomplicated DSAEK. Three patients had known optic nerve or macular disease precluding vision better than 20/200. Of the remaining 14 patients, 11 had BSCVA of 20/40 by postoperative week 12 (7 by week 6). The remaining 2 were 20/50 by weeks 6 and 12. All 14 patients were 20/40 or better at 1 year. One patient had a primary graft failure, and surgery was repeated with 20/40 BSCVA at 1 year. The dislocation rate was 25%. The average cell count between 7 and 10 months was 1714. The average pachymetry was 682. CONCLUSION: DSAEK surgery allows rapid, excellent BSCVAvisual recovery. The rate of visual recovery is more rapid than usually found with penetrating keratoplasty.

Recovery of Contrast Sensitivity After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To study the change in contrast sensitivities in eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and bullous keratopathy after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this prospective study, 50 pseudophakic eyes of 50 patients who received DMEK surgery at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin were included. Visual acuity; contrast sensitivity using OPTEC 6500 at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree in photopic and mesopic light with and without glare; central corneal thickness (CCT); and anterior and posterior corneal aberrations were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Best-corrected visual acuity (preoperative 0.67 ± 0.46 and after 12 months 0.19 ± 0.16 LogMAR, P < 0.001) and photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities with and without glare improved significantly, whereas CCT decreased significantly (preoperative 677 ± 114 µm, after 12 months 527 ± 29 µm, P < 0.001). Preoperative CCT correlates significantly with preoperative photopic contrast sensitivity (correlation coefficient -0.462, P = 0.002), and postoperative total anterior aberrations correlates with postoperative photopic contrast sensitivity (correlation coefficient -0.361, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities, especially with glare, are impaired in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and bullous keratopathy. The extent of the corneal thickening seems to mainly influence the contrast sensitivity preoperatively. DMEK surgery improves the contrast sensitivity significantly. However, higher postoperative anterior corneal aberrations limit the postoperative contrast sensitivities.

Techniques, Outcomes, and Complications of Preloaded, Trifolded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using the DMEK EndoGlide.

PURPOSE: To describe 2 insertion techniques, outcomes, and complications of preloaded, trifolded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) cases using the DMEK EndoGlide inserter. METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive case series analyzed the first 35 cases using the DMEK EndoGlide performed between October 2018 and October 2019 at a single center. Preloaded, trifolded DMEK tissues were delivered through a fluid-injected or pull-through technique. To inject the tissue, a burst of fluid was delivered into the lumen of the injector with a second instrument. Postoperatively, best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), pachymetry, graft survival, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-five eyes of 29 patients underwent DMEK alone (n = 11), with cataract surgery (n = 21), or with additional surgeries (n = 3). Of these, 19 (54.3%) grafts were injected. Video analysis revealed a median time of 3.5 minutes from graft insertion to opening for gas insertion. Median preoperative BSCVA of 0.398 logMAR improved to 0.097 logMAR (P = 0.02) at 9 months. Median pachymetry decreased from 619 µm to 551 µm (P = 0.03) at 9 months. Median donor endothelial cell count of 2890.5 cells/mm2 reduced to 2123 cells/mm2 (26.6% endothelial cell loss; P = 0.008) 6 months postoperatively. One (2.9%) graft failed due to inverted marking at the eye bank and subsequent reverse implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-loaded, tri-folded tissues can be implanted with acceptable levels of endothelial cell loss. We describe a no-touch method of injecting pre-loaded, tri-folded tissue and highlight incorrect marking as a potential complication. This may not be identifiable intraoperatively due to lack of scroll formation.

Quality of vision and vision-related quality of life after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare quality of vision and vision-related quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: Fifty-four eyes of 54 patients with Fuchs' dystrophy from six corneal clinics in the Netherlands were randomized to DMEK or ultrathin DSAEK and examined preoperatively, and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, straylight and vision-related QOL. RESULTS: Posterior corneal HOAs decreased after DMEK and increased after ultrathin DSAEK (p ≤ 0.001) 3 months after surgery and correlated positively with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (12 months: r = 0.29, p = 0.04). Anterior and total corneal HOAs did not differ significantly between both techniques at any time point. Contrast sensitivity was better (p = 0.01), and straylight was lower (p = 0.01) 3 months after DMEK compared with ultrathin DSAEK; 95% confidence interval [CI] of log(cs) 1.10-1.35 versus 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.12, and 95% CI: log(s) 1.18 to 1.43 versus 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.66, respectively. Both were comparable at later time points. Vision-related QOL (scale 0-100) did not differ significantly between both groups at any time point and improved significantly at 3 months (ß = 12 [95% CI: 7 to 16]; p < 0.001), and subsequently between 3 and 12 months (ß = 5 [95% CI: 0 to 9]; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) results in lower posterior corneal HOAs compared with ultrathin DSAEK. Contrast sensitivity and straylight recover faster after DMEK but reach similar levels with both techniques at 1 year. Vision-related QOL improved significantly after surgery, but did not differ between both techniques.

Five-Year Follow-up of First 11 Patients Undergoing Injection of Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cells for Corneal Endothelial Failure.

PURPOSE: To report the safety and efficacy of a novel cell injection therapy using cultured human corneal endothelial cells (hCECs) for endothelial failure conditions via the report of the long-term 5-year postoperative clinical data from a first-in-humans clinical trial group. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: This study involved 11 eyes of 11 patients with pseudophakic endothelial failure conditions who underwent hCEC injection therapy between December 2013 and December 2014. METHODS: All patients underwent follow-up examinations at 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks and 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years after surgery. Specific corneal endothelial cell parameters (i.e., corneal endothelial cell density [ECD], coefficient of variation of area, and percentage of hexagonal cells) and central corneal thickness, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on a Landolt C eye chart, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in central ECD after cell injection therapy, and the secondary outcome was corneal thickness, BCVA, and IOP during the 5-year-postoperative follow-up period. RESULTS: At 5 years after surgery, normal corneal endothelial function was restored in 10 of the 11 eyes, the mean ± standard deviation central corneal ECD was 1257 ± 467 cells/mm2 (range, 601-2067 cells/mm2), BCVA improved significantly in 10 treated eyes, the mean visual acuity changed from 0.876 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution before surgery to 0.046 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution after surgery, and no major adverse reactions directly related to the hCEC injection therapy were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study confirmed the safety and efficacy of cultured hCEC injection therapy for up to 5 years after surgery.

Effect of Anticoagulant Therapy on the Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of anticoagulant therapy (ACT) for systemic diseases on the outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Consecutive eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy that underwent DMEK between August 4, 2011, and July 15, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Data were obtained from the Cologne DMEK database at the University of Cologne, Germany. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), endothelial cell density (at baseline and postoperatively up to 12 months), and rebubbling rates were compared between patients receiving ACT (ACT group) and those with no anticoagulant treatment (NCT group). RESULTS: In this study, 329 eyes of 329 patients were included (ACT group n = 97, NCT group n = 232; mean age 69.9 ± 9.1 years). Bleeding was more common in the ACT group (P < 0.001). Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.59 ± 0.44 and 0.48 ± 0.35 logMAR for the ACT and NCT groups, respectively, which improved to 0.13 ± 0.08 and 0.08 ± 0.16 logMAR, respectively, at 12 months postoperatively. No significant difference in endothelial cell density loss at 12 months was found between the groups (ACT group 36.2% ± 14.7%, NCT group 38.5% ± 15.1%; P = 0.467). Rebubbling rate was 19.6% in the ACT group and 28.9% in the NCT group (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Although ACT increases the risk for preoperative and intraoperative bleeding in DMEK, there seems to be no negative effect on DMEK outcome. Thus, it is not advisable to stop ACT for DMEK surgery.

Heads-up Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery: Feasibility, Surgical Duration, Complication Rates, and Comparison With a Conventional Microscope.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery using the glasses-assisted 3-dimensional (3D) display system NGENUITY (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) and to compare with standard DMEK surgery by using a conventional operating microscope. METHODS: Twelve consecutive cases of DMEK surgery were performed using the glasses-assisted 3D display system NGENUITY (Alcon) and matched with similar cases performed by using the OPMI-Lumera 700 surgical microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) in this prospective cross-sectional study realized at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. DMEK graft preparation time, graft unfolding time, time to perform the descemetorhexis (DM), and overall surgical time were recorded. Best corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density of the donor tissue measured by specular microscopy, and the recipient's central corneal thickness were recorded preoperatively and again at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In the 3D group, time to perform the graft preparation, DM, and global surgical time were significantly higher in the 3D group than in the conventional groups (17 minutes 36 seconds ± 3 minutes 13 seconds and 14 minutes 50 seconds ± 1 minutes 28 seconds, P = 0.04; 6 minutes 18 seconds ± 2 minutes 30 seconds vs. 3 minutes 50 seconds ± 2 minutes 8 seconds, P = 0.03; and 31 minutes 30 seconds ± 6 minutes 10 seconds vs. 24 minutes 10 seconds ± 3 minutes 26 seconds, respectively, P = 0.05). The time to unfold the graft was higher, although not significantly so, in the 3D group compared with the conventional group (5 minutes 15 seconds ± 2 minutes 40 seconds vs. 4 minutes 40 seconds ± 2 minutes 25 seconds, P = 0.89). Mean central corneal thickness decreased about 168 ± 82 µm at 3 months after surgery in the 3D group and about 228 ± 123 µm in the conventional group without significant difference (P = 0.60). Best corrected visual acuity in the 3D group was 0.33 ± 0.32 LogMAR at 3 months after surgery with no significant differences found when compared with conventional surgery. The percent endothelial cell loss from preoperative at 3 months was 35% in the 3D group and 26% in the conventional group, respectively, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Performing DMEK surgery using a 3D display system is feasible; however, it is more challenging and the total surgical time is longer. This method would certainly be useful for instructional courses.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Non-Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the one-year outcomes of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (pDMEK) and non-preloaded DMEK (n-pDMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study consecutively included 68 eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy who underwent either pDMEK (n = 38) or n-pDMEK (n = 30) performed by cornea fellows with an experienced surgeon between 2016 and 2018 at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Exclusion criteria were previous surgery (other than uncomplicated cataract surgery) and any documented evidence of macular or other corneal diseases. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, patient characteristics, postprocessing endothelial cell count, donor graft data, and complications were compared. RESULTS: CDVA showed similar results for pDMEK (0.12 ± 0.11 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [LogMAR]) and n-pDMEK (0.13 ± 0.13 LogMAR) (P = 0.827). Sixty-six percent of the pDMEK eyes and 57% of the n-pDMEK eyes achieved a VA of ≥0.1 LogMAR, and 95% and 97%, respectively, achieved a CDVA ≥0.3 LogMAR. The preoperative central corneal thickness of pDMEK and n-pDMEK (644 ± 62.2 µm, 660.5 ± 56.2 µm) decreased significantly after surgery (525.1 ± 43.6 µm, 526.5 ± 45.2 µm, P < 0.001), with no difference between groups (P = 0.840). The postprocessing endothelial cell count did not differ between pDMEK (2959.2 ± 182.9 cells/mm2) and n-pDMEK (2939.3 ± 278.7 cells/mm2) (P = 0.484). Complication rates were comparable with just the rebubbling performed in a minor procedure room showing a lower rate for pDMEK (13.16%) compared with n-pDMEK (33.33%) (P < 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: One-year clinical outcomes were similar between pDMEK and n-pDMEK procedures, rendering eye bank-prepared pDMEK tissues a useful tool in the treatment of endothelial dysfunction.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Pull-Through Technique With Novel Infusion Forceps.

PURPOSE: To describe a surgical technique of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using an endothelium-in pull-through technique with novel infusion forceps and report 6-month clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 33 cases with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy who underwent either DMEK alone (n = 5), DMEK combined with phacoemulsification (n = 27), or DMEK combined with intraocular lens exchange (n = 1) performed by surgeons at the beginning of the DMEK learning curve. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and need for additional surgeries including rebubbling were evaluated through 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperative BCVA was 0.37 ± 0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and improved to 0.09 ± 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at 6 months (P < 0.001). Eighty-two percent of eyes obtained a BCVA of 20/25 or better. Central corneal thickness decreased significantly at 6 months (P < 0.001). Endothelial cell loss was 29.1% at 6 months (available for 20 of 33 eyes). All surgeries were uneventful. Six eyes required rebubbling for graft detachments. There were no primary or secondary graft failures at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK with infusion microforceps is efficacious and safe in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and could offer a more controlled surgery, making it suitable for both novice and experienced DMEK surgeons.

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: Does It Improve Outcomes in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy?

The role of femtosecond laser -assisted cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy remains poorly defined. This invited commentary examines the current evidence surrounding this often-debated topic.

Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes Compared With Triple-DMEK at 1-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the survival rate 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in pseudophakic eyes versus combined phacoemulsification and DMEK (triple-DMEK). METHODS: Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series. From all DMEKs performed from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, we selected those performed in pseudophakic eyes (pseudophakic DMEK) and those that underwent triple-DMEK. We compared the survival rate 1 year after surgery between both groups and between the Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) cases in both groups, plus the FED cases versus the pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) cases in the pseudophakic DMEK group. Second, we compared rebubbling rates and the influence of the use of gas or corneal sutures on rebubbling and dislocation rates. RESULTS: A total of 329 eyes were included (218 eyes pseudophakic DMEK and 111 eyes triple-DMEK). The survival rate at 1 year was 79.8% and 90%, respectively (P = 0.03). When only FED cases were included (133 pseudophakic DMEK and 108 triple-DMEK), no significant difference was found (87.9% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.59). Within the pseudophakic DMEK group, the survival rate was higher in FED cases (87.8%) compared with PBK cases (66.6%) (P = 0.0001). Rebubbling rates were 21.1% (pseudophakic DMEK) and 17.1% (triple-DMEK) (P = 0.39). The use of gas versus air or placing corneal sutures did not seem to influence the rebubbling (P = 0.64 and P = 0.13, respectively) or dislocation rates (P = 0.71 and P = 0.53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the FED cases, performing phacoemulsification before DMEK or doing a combined procedure did not seem to affect the rebubbling or survival rate up to 1 year postoperatively. PBK was associated with a higher failure rate compared with that of FED.

Refractive Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty + Cataract/Intraocular Lens Triple Procedure: A Fellow Eye Comparison.

PURPOSE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty is often combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (DMEK + cataract/IOL triple procedure) in phakic patients. This procedure results in a refractive shift that is difficult to predict. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that the refractive shift in the second eye follows the shift in the first eye. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, consecutive case series, the refractive outcomes of 254 eyes of 127 patients who underwent DMEK + cataract/IOL triple procedure in both eyes for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy have been analyzed. Main outcome measures were spherical equivalent outcome (shift calculations), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and posterior simulated keratometry. RESULTS: The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity before surgery was 0.51 ± 0.24 and increased to 0.19 ± 0.15 (logMAR) after surgery (P < 0.001). After surgery, a mean hyperopic shift of 0.98 ± 0.89 D was observed. The refractive shift was 1.03 ± 0.93 D and 0.92 ± 1.02 D, in the first and second eyes, respectively (P = 0.435). In a paired analysis, the mean difference of the refractive shift between the first and second eyes was 0.49 ± 0.43 D. CONCLUSIONS: In our fellow eye comparison, the refractive shift after DMEK + cataract/IOL triple procedure in the second eye was comparable with the shift in the first eye. As a consequence, the refractive outcome of the first eye might serve as a reference for optimizing the refractive target in the second eye. Further studies investigating the influence of corneal parameters on refractive shift are needed for a more predictable lens power selection.

Microthin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes, complications, and vision-related quality of life (QoL) after microthin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (MT-DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the management of corneal endothelial dysfunction in Fuchs dystrophy. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with visually significant endothelial decompensation from Fuchs dystrophy were prospectively randomized to receive MT-DSAEK or DMEK surgery. The primary outcome was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included refraction, keratometry, endothelial cell count, complications, and vision-related QoL at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes of 56 patients were enrolled, 28 in each group. Postoperatively, LogMAR mean BSCVA in the MT-DSAEK group was 0.17 ± 0.08 and 0.11 ± 0.09 at 6 and 12 months compared with 0.09 ± 0.13 and 0.04 ± 0.13 after DMEK (P = 0.03, P = 0.002 respectively) with the DMEK cohort achieving 3.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters better BSCVA at 1 year compared with MT-DSAEK. Complication rates were similar with 3.5% rebubbling rate in both groups, 1 primary graft failure in DMEK and a single endothelial rejection in the MT-DSAEK arm. Vision-related QoL was comparable at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and no eyes demonstrated loss of vision from preoperative BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK surgery resulted in significantly better BSCVA at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared with MT-DSAEK. Patient satisfaction was similar with no differences reported in vision-related QoL scores, as was the complications profile between groups. Thus, our results favor DMEK as the better choice procedure for eyes with Fuchs-related corneal decompensation without ocular comorbidities.

Postoperative Complications in Medicare Beneficiaries Following Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine national-level incidence rates of major postoperative complications following endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures and to stratify these rates based on EK indications over an 8-year period using Medicare claims data. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. METHODS: Setting: population-based; study population: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who underwent EK procedures; main outcome measurements: 1) occurrence of major postoperative complications (i.e., endophthalmitis, choroidal hemorrhage, infectious keratitis, cystoid macular edema [CME], retinal detachment [RD], or RD surgery) following EK surgery; 2) time-to-event analysis for glaucoma surgery; and 3) occurrence of graft complications. RESULTS: A total of 94,829 EK procedures (n = 71,040 unique patients) were included in the analysis. Of the total, 29% of patients had pre-existing glaucoma. The overall 90-day cumulative incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis and choroidal hemorrhage following EK was 0.03% and 0.05%, respectively. The overall 1-year cumulative rates of RD or RD surgery, infectious keratitis, and CME were 1.0%, 0.8%, and 4.1%, respectively. Approximately 7.6%, 12.2%, and 13.8% of all eyes in this study needed glaucoma surgery at 1-, 5-, and 8-years of follow-up, respectively. The probability of glaucoma surgery among patients with pre-existing glaucoma was 29% vs. 8% among those without pre-existing glaucoma at 8 years. The cumulative probabilities of developing any graft complications were 13%, 23.2%, and 27.1% at 1, 5, and 8 years, respectively, of follow-up. On average, patients undergoing EK procedures for a prior failed graft had the highest rate of complications, whereas those with Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy had the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major postoperative complications including endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and choroidal hemorrhage following EK procedures is low. A high proportion of eyes undergoing EK eventually require glaucoma surgery and experience graft-related complications. Postoperative outcomes are typically worse for patients undergoing EK for prior failed grafts than for those undergoing EK for Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), refractive astigmatism, and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four pseudophakic eyes of 54 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction resulting from Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were enrolled in 6 corneal centers in The Netherlands. METHODS: Participants were allocated to DMEK (n = 29) or UT-DSAEK (n = 25) using minimization randomization based on preoperative BSCVA, recipient central corneal thickness, gender, age, and institution. Donor corneas were prestripped and precut for DMEK and UT-DSAEK, respectively. Six corneal surgeons participated in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was BSCVA at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Central graft thickness of UT-DSAEK lamellae measured 101 µm (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-112 µm). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly between DMEK and UT-DSAEK groups at 3 months (0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [95% CI 0.08-0.22 logMAR] vs. 0.22 logMAR [95% CI 0.16-0.27 logMAR]; P = 0.15), 6 months (0.11 logMAR [95% CI 0.05-0.17 logMAR] vs. 0.16 logMAR [95% CI 0.12-0.21 logMAR]; P = 0.20), and 12 months (0.08 logMAR [95% CI 0.03-0.14 logMAR] vs. 0.15 logMAR [95% CI 0.10-0.19 logMAR]; P = 0.06). Twelve months after surgery, the percentage of eyes reaching 20/25 Snellen BSCVA was higher in DMEK compared with UT-DSAEK (66% vs. 33%; P = 0.02). Endothelial cell density did not differ significantly 12 months after DMEK and UT-DSAEK (1870 cells/mm2 [95% CI 1670-2069 cells/mm2] vs. 1612 cells/mm2 [95% CI 1326-1898 cells/mm2]; P = 0.12). Both techniques induced a mild hyperopic shift (12 months: +0.22 diopter [D; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.68 D] for DMEK vs. +0.58 D [95% CI 0.13-1.03 D] for UT-DSAEK; P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and UT-DSAEK did not differ significantly in mean BSCVA, but the percentage of eyes achieving 20/25 Snellen vision was significantly higher with DMEK. Endothelial cell loss did not differ significantly between the treatment groups, and both techniques induced a minimal hyperopic shift.