Early versus late follicular phase ovarian stimulation: a randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is late follicular phase stimulation as efficient as early follicular phase stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in oocyte donors in terms of the number of oocytes. DESIGN: In this open label, phase 3, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial using a two-arm design with a 1:1 allocation ratio, 84 oocyte donors were allocated to the early follicular start group (control group, n = 41) or the late follicular start group (study group, n = 43). In the control group, women followed a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol with recombinant FSH (r-FSH) 225 IU. In the study group, r-FSH 225 IU was initiated in the late follicular phase. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes. The secondary outcomes were the number of mature oocytes, consumption of gonadotrophins and GnRH antagonist, and cost of medication. RESULTS: The number of oocytes did not differ between the control group and the study group (intent-to-treat analysis 15.5 ± 11.0 versus 14.0 ± 10.7, P = 0.52; per-protocol analysis 18.2 ± 9.7 versus 18.8 ± 7.8, P = 0.62). In addition, the number of mature oocytes did not differ between the groups (14.1 ± 8.1 versus 12.7 ± 8.5, P = 0.48). The duration of stimulation was shorter in the control group (10.0 ± 1.4 versus 10.9 ± 1.5 days, P = 0.01). The total amount of r-FSH used was lower in the control group (2240.7 ± 313.9 IU versus 2453.9 ± 330.1 IU, P = 0.008). A GnRH antagonist was used for approximately 6 days in the control group, while a GnRH antagonist was only prescribed for one woman in the study group (6.0 ± 1.4 days versus 0.13±0.7 days, P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the cost of medication per cycle between the groups (1147.9 ± 182.8€ in control group versus 979.9 ± 129.0€ in study group, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Late follicular phase stimulation is as efficient as early follicular phase stimulation in terms of the number of oocytes.

The impact of (very) young donor age on euploid rates: An analysis of 1831 trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with 24-chromosome NGS screening in oocyte donation cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Conflicting data exists regarding whether a younger age of donors has a negative influence on the outcomes of oocyte donation cycles. Is there any correlation between a younger age of donors and the rate of embryonic aneuploidy in oocyte donation cycles? DESIGN: Retrospective study including 515 oocyte donation cycles carried out between February 2017 and November 2022. Comprehensive chromosomal screening was performed on 1831 blastocysts. 1793 had a result which were categorised into groups based on the age of the donor: 18-22 (n = 415), 23-25 (n = 600), 26-30 (n = 488), and 31-35 years (n = 290). The analysis aimed to determine the percentage of biopsy samples that were euploid and the number that were aneuploid, relative to the age group of the oocyte donor. Additionally, linear regression was employed to examine the relationship between age and the proportion of aneuploid embryos, while controlling for relevant variables. RESULTS: Aneuploidy increased predictably with donor age: 18-22 years: 27.5 %; 23-25 years: 31.2 %; 26-30 years: 31.8 %; and 31-35 years: 38.6 %. In the donor group aged 31-35 years, a higher percentage of aneuploid embryos was observed compared to younger donors in univariate analysis (OR: 1.66, 95 % CI: 1.21-2.29, p = 0.002) and multivariate logistic analysis (OR: 2.65, 95 % CI: 1.67-4.23, p < 0.001). The rates of embryonic mosaicism revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: The lowest risk of embryonic aneuploidy was found among donors aged <22 years. Conversely, an elevated prevalence was evident within the donor group aged 31-35 years, in contrast to the younger cohorts. The incidence of mosaic embryos remained consistent across all age groups.

Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone from day 7 of the cycle onwards in oocyte donation cycles: a longitudinal study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with dydrogesterone from cycle day 7 yield similar outcomes compared with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in the same oocyte donors? DESIGN: This retrospective longitudinal study included 128 cycles from 64 oocyte donors. All oocyte donors had the same type of gonadotrophin and daily dose in both stimulation cycles. The primary outcome was the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved. RESULTS: The number of COC retrieved (mean ± SD 19.7 ± 10.8 versus 19.2 ± 8.3; P = 0.5) and the number of metaphase II oocytes (15.5 ± 8.4 versus 16.2 ± 7.0; P = 0.19) were similar for the PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols, respectively. The duration of stimulation (10.5 ± 1.5 days versus 10.8 ± 1.5 days; P = 0.14) and consumption of gonadotrophins (2271.9 ± 429.7 IU versus 2321.5 ± 403.4 IU; P = 0.2) were also comparable, without any cases of premature ovulation. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the total cost of medication per cycle: €898.3 ± 169.9 for the PPOS protocol versus €1196.4 ± 207.5 (P < 0.001) for the GnRH antagonist protocol. CONCLUSION: The number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II oocytes were comparable in both stimulation protocols, with the advantage of significant cost reduction in favour of the PPOS protocol compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol. No cases of premature ovulation were observed, even when progestin was started later in the stimulation.

New recommendations for informing patients and gamete donors in assisted reproduction.

The number of cycles of assisted reproduction using donor body parts is increasing significantly. In Europe alone, around one hundred thousand children are born each year who have some relationship to three or more parents. The European expert guarantor European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology therefore issued a recommendation in 2022 to inform donors, recipients and children born in this way. Our article analyses developments in this area and proposes a solution for the Czech Republic. It is necessary for providers to immediately respond to the fact that the anonymity of donation can no longer be guaranteed, and to adapt the content of consultations and informed consents of potential donors and applicants accordingly. Legislation then has two possible solutions: first to adopt a system of "polyparenthoods" or second to fundamentally limit donation cycles.

Optimal antimüllerian hormone levels in oocyte donors: a national database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between high antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels in oocyte donors and embryo development and pregnancy outcomes among donor oocyte recipients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Donor Egg Bank Database. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization using vitrified donor oocytes from 35 in vitro fertilization centers in the United States between 2013 and 2021. For each recipient, the first oocyte lot that was received with a planned insemination and embryo transfer (ET) was included. INTERVENTION: Oocyte donor-recipient cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) per ET. RESULTS: A total of 3,871 donor oocyte-recipient thaw cycles were analyzed. On the basis of donor AMH serum concentration, cycles were stratified into the high AMH group (AMH ≥5 ng/mL; n = 1,821) and the referent group (AMH <5 ng/mL; n = 2,050). Generalized estimating equation models were used to account for donors that contributed more than one lot of oocytes. The number of usable embryos per lot (median [interquartile range]) was significantly increased in the high AMH group (2 [2-4]) compared with the referent group (2 [1-3]) (relative risk [RR] 1.06; confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.12). Among recipients with a planned ET, there was no difference in OPR between the high AMH group (45.4%) and the referent group (43.5%) (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.15). Among preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles, the embryo euploidy rate per biopsy was similar at 66.7% (50%-100%) in both groups (RR 1.04; CI 0.92-1.17). The OPR per euploid ET among patients who used preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was also comparable, at 52% in the high AMH group and 54.1% in the referent group (RR 0.95; CI 0.74-1.23). CONCLUSION: This large national database study observed that there was no association between a high level of AMH (≥5 ng/mL) in oocyte donors and an OPR in the recipient after the first ET. On the basis of these findings, recipients and physicians can be reassured that oocyte donors with a high AMH level can be expected to produce outcomes that are at least as good as donors with an AMH level (<5 ng/mL).

Representações sociais sobre maternidade na reprodução humana assistida: discursos de mulheres inférteis / Social representations of motherhood in assisted human reproduction: discourses of infertile women / Representaciones sociales de la maternidad en la reproducción humana asistida: relatos de mujeres infértiles

Este trabalho tem o objetivo de analisar as concepções de maternidade para mulheres inférteis de diferentes níveis socioeconômicos que estão em tratamento de reprodução assistida. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo, descritivo, que utilizou como instrumento uma entrevista semiestruturada e contemplou temas como o significado de família, desejo/expectativas sobre filho e gestação e expectativas sobre a maternidade. Participaram da pesquisa 48 mulheres inférteis acima de 35 anos que usam tecnologias de reprodução assistida de alta complexidade em instituições privada e pública. Os dados foram tratados pela análise de conteúdo em que emergiram os temas: representações sociais da família; representações sociais da maternidade; expectativas com a gestação e os modelos maternos; e o filho imaginado. As participantes representaram a família de forma positiva, como um sistema de suporte, de fundação e origem de amor, configurando-a como um laço social. Por outro lado, as concepções de família com base na consanguinidade também estiveram presentes, representando a família pela perpetuação da espécie e pela importância do laço biológico. A maternidade foi marcada por significativa idealização, sendo vista como um papel gratificante e de realização da feminilidade. O peso da cobrança social para procriar também foi sentido como um dever a cumprir e que, na impossibilidade de se realizar, gera sentimentos de inferioridade, menos-valia, impotência e inadequação perante a sociedade, o que reforça o estigma da infertilidade. Tais resultados apontam a importância de reflexões sobre o papel da mulher na nossa cultura, visto que a maternidade é ainda utilizada como medida para o sucesso ou fracasso feminino. Faz-se necessário também refletir sobre a possibilidade da maior inserção do trabalho psicológico na reprodução assistida, visto a carga emocional e social envolvidas nesse processo.(AU)

This study aimed to analyze the conceptions of motherhood for infertile women from different socioeconomic levels who are undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. This is a qualitative and descriptive study that used a semi-structured interview as an instrument and included topics such as the meaning of family and desires/expectations about the child, pregnancy, and motherhood. A total of 48 infertile women over 35 years of ages using high-complexity assisted reproductive technologies in private and public institutions participated in this research. The data were treated by content analysis in which the following themes emerged: family social representations; social representations of motherhood; expectations with pregnancy and maternal models; and the imagined son. Participants represented the family in a positive way as a support system and the foundation and origin of love, embracing the family as a social bond. On the other hand, the family concepts based on inbreeding were also present, representing the family by perpetuation of the species and the importance of biological bonds. Motherhood was marked by significant idealization, being seen as a gratifying role and the fulfillment of femininity. The weight of the social demand to procreate was also felt as a duty to be fulfilled that, in the impossibility of carrying it out, generates feelings of inferiority, worthlessness, impotence, and inadequacy toward society, which reinforce the stigma of infertility. Results point to the necessary reflections on the role of women and our culture since Motherhood is still used as a measure of female success or failure. They also point to a reflection on the possibility of greater inclusion of psychological work in assisted reproduction given the emotional and social burden involved in this process.(AU)

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar las concepciones de maternidad de mujeres infértiles, de diferentes niveles socioeconómicos, que se encuentran en tratamiento de reproducción asistida. Se trata de un estudio cualitativo, descriptivo, que utilizó como instrumento una entrevista semiestructurada e incluyó temas como el sentido de la familia, deseos/expectativas sobre el hijo y el embarazo y expectativas sobre la maternidad. Participaron en la investigación un total de 48 mujeres infértiles, mayores de 35 años, usuarias de tecnologías de reproducción asistida de alta complejidad en instituciones públicas y privadas. Los datos se sometieron a análisis de contenido del cual surgieron los temas: representaciones sociales familiares; representaciones sociales de la maternidad; expectativas con el embarazo y modelos maternos; hijo imaginado. Las participantes representaron a la familia de manera positiva, como sistema de apoyo, fundamento y origen del amor, configurándola como vínculo social. Por otro lado, también estuvieron presentes las concepciones familiares basadas en la consanguinidad, representando a la familia para la perpetuación de la especie y la importancia del vínculo biológico. La maternidad estuvo marcada por una importante idealización, vista como un rol gratificante y de realización de la feminidad. También se sintió el peso de la demanda social de procrear como un deber que cumplir y que, ante la imposibilidad de realizarlo, genera sentimientos de inferioridad, desvalorización, impotencia e inadecuación en la sociedad, lo que refuerza el estigma de la infertilidad. Por tanto, son necesarias reflexiones sobre el papel de la mujer en nuestra cultura, ya que la maternidad se sigue utilizando como medida del éxito o fracaso femenino. También se reflexiona sobre la posibilidad de una mayor inclusión del trabajo psicológico en la reproducción asistida dada la carga emocional y social que implica este proceso.(AU)

Reproductive outcomes of oocyte donation in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate live-birth rates per embryo transfer in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies (UMAs). Secondary objectives were to compare reproductive outcomes between the normal uterus group, the different UMA types, and UMA subgroups with and without required surgery. DESIGN: This retrospective study compared two cohorts, one with UMAs and other with normal uteri of our oocyte donation program at 12 Instituto Valenciano De Infertilidad/Reproductive Medicine Associates University affiliated clinics from January 2000 to 2020. The oocyte donation reduces confounding because of differences in embryo quality. The primary outcome was the live-birth rate per embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes included the rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and ongoing pregnancy. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. PATIENTS: Infertile women undergoing oocyte donation with UMAs. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth. RESULTS: We analyzed 58,337 cycles of oocyte donation: 57,869 patients had no uterine malformation, and 468 women had UMAs. Compared with patients with normal uteri, patients with UMAs had lower rates of live births (36.67% [32.84-40.65] vs. 38.1% [95% confidence intervals {CI}: 37.82-38.42]) and ongoing pregnancy (39.74% [35.93-43.66] vs. 41.5% [41.24-41.83]). The miscarriage rate was higher in patients with UMAs (19.5% [16.55-22.85] vs. 16.6% [16.47-16.92]). Specifically, patients with a unicornuate uterus (n=29) had lower rates of implantation (24.07% [13.49-37.64] vs. 42.85% [95% CI: 42.6-43.09]), pregnancy (41.86% [27.01-57.87] vs. 59.51% [59.22-59.81]), ongoing pregnancy (16.67% [6.97-31.36] vs. 41.54% [41.24-41.83]), and live births (16.67% [6.97-31.36] vs. 38.12% [37.83-38.42]). In addition, patients with a partial septate uterus (n=91) had a higher miscarriage rate (26.50% [18.44-34.89] vs. 16.7% [16.47-16.92]). Compared with the normal uterus group, the live-birth rates were lower in the UMA without surgery group (33.09% [27.59-38.96] vs. 38.12% [37.83-38.42]). CONCLUSION: Among patients who received embryos derived from donated oocytes, live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates were lower in patients with UMAs compared with patients with normal uteri. A higher miscarriage rate was found in patients with UMAs. Patients with a unicornuate uterus had worse reproductive outcomes. Our results show that the uterus is less competent in patients with UMAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04571671).

Oocyte donation outcomes in endometriosis patients with multiple IVF failures.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the reproductive outcomes and the prognostic factors of live birth rates in patients with endometriosis referred to oocyte donation after multiple IVF failures? DESIGN: Observational cohort study including all women with endometriosis-related infertility and two or more failed IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles referred to oocyte donation between January 2013 and June 2022. Endometriosis was diagnosed based on published imaging criteria, and was confirmed histologically in women who had a history of surgery for endometriosis. The main outcome measured was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The characteristics of women who had a live birth were compared with those who did not using univariate and multivariate analysis to identify determinant factors of fertility outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent 90 oocyte donation cycles after 244 failed autologous IVF cycles. The mean ± SD age of the population was 36.8 ± 3.3 years, with a mean duration of infertility of 3.6 ± 2.2 years, and a mean number of autologous IVF/ICSI cycles of 4.4 ± 2.3 cycles per patient. Three patients (5.3%) had superficial peritoneal endometriosis, two patients (3.5%) had ovarian endometriomas, and 52 patients (91.2%) had deep infiltrating endometriosis, among which 30 patients (57.7%) had bowel lesions. Thirty patients (52.6%) had associated adenomyosis. Overall, CLBR per patient was 36/57 (63.2%). After multivariate analysis, only being nulligravida (P=0.002) remained an independent negative predictive factor of the live birth rate. Previous surgery did not impact reproductive outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that oocyte donation appears to be a viable option to optimize the live birth rate in women with endometriosis-related infertility and recurrent IVF failures.

Agonist triggering in oocyte donation programs-Mini review.

Oocyte donation programs involve young and healthy women undergoing heavy ovarian stimulation protocols in order to yield good-quality oocytes for their respective recipient couples. These stimulation cycles were for many years beset by a serious and potentially lethal complication known as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The use of the short antagonist protocol not only is patient-friendly but also has halved the need for hospitalization due to OHSS sequelae. Moreover, the replacement of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) triggering has reduced OHSS occurrence significantly, almost eliminating its moderate to severe presentations. Despite differences in the dosage and type of GnRH-a used across different studies, a comparable number of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization, blastulation, and pregnancy rates in egg recipients are seen when compared to hCG-triggered cycles. Nowadays, GnRH-a tend to be the triggering agents of choice in oocyte donation cycles, as they are effective and safe and reduce OHSS incidence. However, as GnRH-a triggering does not eliminate OHSS altogether, caution should be practiced in order to avoid unnecessary lengthy and heavy ovarian stimulation that could potentially compromise both the donor's wellbeing and the treatment's efficacy.

Impact of endometrial thickness change in response to progesterone on live birth rates embryo transfers with fresh oocyte donation cycles.

Endometrial thickness (ENT) measurements are important to evaluate endometrial receptivity. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes has been discussed for many years with conflicting results. The aim of our study was to find out the effect of endometrial thickness (ENT) change in response to progesterone on pregnancy outcomes in embryo transfer (ET) of fresh oocyte donation (OD) recipients. The study was designed retrospectively including 134 embryo transfers with fresh OD recipients. ENT was measured by ultrasonography (USG) on the day of initial progesterone administration (ENT1) and on ET day (ENT2). The primary outcome was to determine any correlation between the ENT change and pregnancy outcomes. ENT increased in 56.7% of cases and decreased in 43.4%. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in recipients with increased ENT was 76.3%, and live birth rate (LBR) was 72.4%. CPR in recipients with decreased ENT was 69.0% and LBR was 65.5%. There was no significant difference between recipients with either increased or decreased ENT regarding CPR and LBR (p = .225 and p = .253, respectively). Our study revealed that ENT change after 6 days of progesterone administration, whether increased or decreased, does not have any significant effect on LBR and CPR in fresh OD recipients.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Measurement of endometrial thickness is beneficial to determine the endometrial receptivity. However, there is controversy in the literature regarding the usefulness of measuring endometrial thickness.What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study performed with fresh oocyte donation cycles with large number of recipients for live birth rate outcomes in the literature so far. In this study, we sought to assess the impact of endometrial thickness change, in response to 6 days of progesterone administration, on live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate in embryo transfer of fresh oocyte donation recipients. We did not find no significant effect of endometrial thickness change on live birth rate when fresh young donor oocytes are fertilised with sperms having normal parameters, and implanted in oestrogen and progesterone primed endometrium.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Measurement of endometrial thickness in patients under infertility treatment provides little benefit to clinical outcomes.

La responsabilidad subjetiva en los derroteros del deseo de hijo / Subjective Responsibility in the Paths of the Desire for a Child

El presente escrito aborda la cuestión del proyecto monomarental, sus derroteros y periplos singulares. Al tiempo que en ellos se vislumbra un camino muchas veces compartido y repetido. La temática reviste una presencia estadística en aumento a nivel mundial que visibiliza cambios sociales, económicos y de derechos en la agenda femenina. El objetivo central del escrito radica en describir en primera persona las circunstancias que llevaron a Helen a recurrir a la ovodonación como método reproductivo y los duelos que dicho recorrido encierra. En síntesis, en la historia de Helen se vislumbra de modo paradigmático el encuentro con la imposibilidad del propio cuerpo reproductivo y la solución que ofrece la medicina; al tiempo que en otra cuerda, se trasluce la dimensión singular y clínica de las decisiones subjetivas por las que ella deberá responder

This paper addresses the question of the singleparent project, its paths and unique journeys. At the same time that in them a path many times shared and repeated is glimpsed. The issue has a growing statistical presence worldwide that makes visible social, economic and rights changes on the women's agenda. The central objective of the writing lies in describing in the first person the circumstances that led Helen to resort to egg donation as a reproductive method and the duels that this journey entails. In short, in Helen's story, the encounter with the impossibility of the reproductive body itself and the solution offered by medicine is glimpsed in a paradigmatic way; while on another string, the singular and clinical dimension of the subjective decisions for which she will have to answer shines through

Vitrification does not affect birth weight: lessons from the oocyte donation model.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is embryo cryopreservation a cause of high birth weight and large for gestational age (LGA) in singletons resulting from vitrified-warmed embryo transfer? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study evaluating 670 oocyte recipients who underwent fresh (367 cycles) or vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (303 cycles) at Instituto Bernabeu between July 2017 and March 2019. All single blastocyst transfers carried out in an artificial cycle that resulted in a singleton live birth were included. RESULTS: Maternal age (42.21 ± 4.45; 42.79 ± 3.83; P = 0.519), body mass index (23.34 ± 3.69; 23.80 ± 3.78; P = 0.075), gestational age (38.96 ± 1.97; 38.77 ± 2.15; P = 0.207), maternal smoking (10.8%; 13.0%; P = 0.475), gestational diabetes (4.9%; 4.3% P = 0.854), preeclampsia (2.7%; 5.6%; P = 0.074), hypertensive disorders (3.3%; 2.3%; P = 0.494), maternal parity (multiparous 18.5%; 14.5%; P = 0.177) and liveborn gender (female 44.5%; 48.8%; P = 0.276) were not significantly different between fresh or vitrified-warmed groups. Endometrial thickness was significantly higher in the fresh versus vitrified-warmed group (8.83 ± 1.73 versus 8.57 ± 1.59; P = 0.035, respectively). Oocyte donor height was similar between the fresh versus vitrified-warmed group (163.22 ± 5.88 versus 164.27 ± 6.66 cm; P = 0.057, respectively). Mean birth weight was not significantly different (3239.21 ± 550.43; 3224.56 ± 570.83; adjusted P = 0.058). No differences were observed in macrosomia (7.1%; 6.3%; adjusted OR 0.857, 95% CI 0.314 to 2.340, P = 0.764), LGA (6.0%; 6.7%; adjusted OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.176 to 1.149, P = 0.095), pre-term birth (10.9%; 9.0% adjusted P = 0.997), very pre-term birth (0.8%; 1.3%; adjusted P = 1.000), extremely pre-term birth (0%; 1.0%; adjusted P = 0.998); underweight (10.0%; 7.0%; adjusted P = 0.050); very low weight (0.6; 1.1%; adjusted P = 1.000) and small for gestational age (1.9%; 0.7%; adjusted P = 0.974) between fresh or vitrified-warmed groups. CONCLUSION: This study eliminates potential confounders that might influence fetal growth and demonstrates that embryo vitrification and warming procedures do not affect birth weight.

La técnica de transferencia de huso meiótico desde la perspectiva legal en la República Argentina / THE MEIOTIC SPINDLE TRANSFER TECHNIQUE FROM THE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IN THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC

La transferencia de huso permite evitar enfermedades de herencia mitocondria. El art. 57 del Código Civil y Comercial, que utiliza una redacción amplia para no quedar obsoleto, apuntaría la prohibición a la manipulación de embriones en busca de mejoras determinadas, pero no a aquellas prácticas que tienen un fin terapéutico. Sin embargo, hay que repensar los límites de la prohibición y la razonabilidad de este tratamiento.

Spindle transfer makes it possible to avoid diseases of mitochondrial inheritance. The art. 57 of the Civil and Commercial Code, which uses a broad wording so as not to become obsolete, would point the prohibition to the manipulation of embryos in search of certain improvements, but not to those practices that have a therapeutic purpose. However, it is necessary to rethink the limits of the prohibition and the reasonableness of this treatment.

Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in oocyte donation: a model for elective fertility preservation?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does type of LH peak suppression (progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation [PPOS] versus gonadotrophin releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) affect oocyte competence, embryo development and live birth rates in recipients of vitrified donated oocytes? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study conducted between 2016 and 2018, involving 187 recipient cycles of donated vitrified oocytes. Oocyte donors were stimulated under LH suppression with desogestrel for PPOS (DSG group) or ganirelix GnRH antagonist (ANT group). Recipients younger than 50 years received vitrified oocytes from DSG donation cycles (DSG-R) or ANT donation cycles (ANT-R). RESULTS: A mean of 10.07 ± 3.54 oocytes per recipient were warmed (survival rate of 80.7%), and 5.90 ± 2.89 were fertilized (fertilization rate 72.6%). Out of 187 recipients, 168 achieved embryo transfers. No significant differences were found in warming survival rates, fertilization rates and embryo development between DSG-R and ANT-R groups. Ninety-four clinical pregnancies and 81 live births were achieved. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rates (47.7% versus 52.5, P = 0.513) and live birth rates (39.5% versus 46.5%, P = 0.336) per recipient cycle between DSG-R and ANT-R, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the effect of treating oocyte donors. Live birth rate adjusted for associated factors was not statistically different between vitrified oocytes from DSG or ANT (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.47). CONCLUSION: Reproductive outcomes of recipients of vitrified oocytes are not affected by donor PPOS treatment. PPOS is suitable for suppressing LH peak in elective fertility preservation and in freeze-all strategies.

Oocyte yield in social, medical and donor oocyte cryopreservation cycles.

To determine if oocyte yield in women undergoing cryopreservation for social (SOC), medical (MOC) and oocyte donation (OD) cycles is comparable when matched for age. 315 oocyte retrievals were performed for SOC, 116 for MOC and 392 for OD. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and Poisson regression were used to assess the impact of age stratification. The median ages of women undergoing SOC, MOC, and OD were 38, 31 and 26 years respectively. The median (IQR) number of oocytes in the three categories was 7, 10, and 12. The oocyte yield was significantly higher in women aged 30-34 years undergoing SOC, compared to the MOC group. For the SOC group, age in years, oestradiol levels per 1000 pmol/and follicle count >12mm on the day of trigger were significant predictors of oocyte yield. Women embarking on SOC are significantly older than those undergoing MOC and OD, and thus oocyte yield is reduced when stratified for age. This study highlights the significant predictors of oocyte yield amongst women undergoing oocyte cryopreservation for specific indications. The findings can be used to optimise the yield and overall chance of successful livebirth.

Embryology outcomes after oocyte vitrification with super-cooled slush nitrogen are similar to outcomes with conventional liquid nitrogen: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of slush nitrogen (SN), a super-cooled form of nitrogen with a temperature from -207 to -210 °C, can improve oocyte survival after vitrification and warming compared with conventional liquid nitrogen (LN). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic-affiliated private practice. PATIENT(S): A total of 556 metaphase II oocytes from 32 oocyte donor cycles were included. INTERVENTION(S): Donor oocytes were block randomized to undergo vitrification with either SN or LN. Vitrification was followed by warming, fertilization with donor sperm, embryo culture to the blastocyst stage, and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy via trophectoderm biopsy with targeted next-generation sequencing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was oocyte survival after vitrification and warming. Secondary outcomes included rates of fertilization, usable blastocyst formation, and whole chromosome aneuploidy. RESULT(S): Half of the metaphase II oocytes (n = 278) were randomized to undergo vitrification with SN, whereas the other half (n = 278) were randomized to undergo vitrification with LN. There were no statistically significant differences noted in oocyte survival rate (85.3% vs. 86.3%), fertilization rate (84.0% vs. 80.0%), rate of usable blastocyst formation (54.3% vs. 55.7%), or rate of whole chromosome aneuploidy (9.4% vs. 11.7%) between the SN and LN arms, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The implementation of an SN oocyte vitrification protocol resulted in similar embryology outcomes compared with LN. The use of SN did not lead to any demonstrable improvement in oocyte survival after vitrification and warming. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04342364.

Uncomplicated oocyte donation pregnancies display an elevated CD163-positive type 2 macrophage load in the decidua, which is associated with fetal-maternal HLA mismatches.

PROBLEM: The embryo of an oocyte donation (OD) pregnancy is completely allogeneic to the mother, which may challenge the maternal immune system to tolerize the fetus. Decidual macrophages are essential in maintaining a healthy pregnancy, and type 2 macrophages may exhibit immune suppressive activity. We hypothesized that the composition of decidual macrophages is different between uncomplicated OD pregnancies and non-OD in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies, and is related to fetal-maternal incompatibility. METHOD OF STUDY: Women with uncomplicated pregnancy were enrolled: 25 singleton OD pregnancies and 17 non-OD IVF pregnancies. The extent of immunohistochemical staining of CD14 (pan-macrophage marker) and CD163 (type 2 macrophage marker) in both decidua basalis and parietalis was quantitated by digital image analysis. Maternal and fetal DNA was typed for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, C, -DRB1, and -DQB1, and fetal-maternal HLA mismatches were calculated. RESULTS: OD pregnancies showed a higher percentage of CD163+ staining (P = .040) and higher CD163/CD14 ratio (P = .032) in the parietalis than non-OD IVF. The OD group was separated into a semi-allogeneic group (≤5 fetal maternal HLA mismatches) and a fully allogeneic group (> 5 mismatches). The HLA-fully-allogeneic OD group, but not the HLA-semi-allogeneic OD group, showed significantly elevated CD163/CD14 ratio in the parietalis compared with the non-OD IVF group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Uncomplicated OD pregnancies display a higher CD163-positive cell fraction in the total decidual macrophage population compared to autologous pregnancies, which may suggest that a local type 2 macrophage-related mechanism is needed to compensate for the higher fetal-maternal HLA mismatch load.

Laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion syndrome in a dizygotic monochorionic twin pregnancy: A case report.

OBJECTIVE: A monochorionic dizygotic (MCDZ) twin is rare, especially when complicated with twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and treated by laser therapy. CASE REPORT: A pregnancy achieved from oocyte donation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection resulted in two embryos transferred. A monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy was diagnosed by an early ultrasound; however, at 16 weeks of gestation, instead of the same sex, the ultrasound suspected there was sex discrepancy between the twins. TTTS with severe polyhydramnios occurred at 22 weeks, leading to a laser therapy, which was followed with a smooth post-operation course. Then the Cesarean section was performed at the gestational age of 29 weeks due to severe preeclampsia, giving birth to two live newborns: one female and one male baby both without neurological sequelae at the time of discharge. Blood chromosomes obtained at delivery and 65 days after delivery all revealed an XX and XY chimera from both babies. CONCLUSION: Laser therapy is also effective in MCDZ twin complicated with TTTS. Determination of chorionicity in early pregnancy could timely prompt us to watch out for complications unique to monochorionic twin pregnancy.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a useful alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in oocyte donation: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare ovarian response and reproductive outcomes in oocyte donors undergoing pituitary suppression with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) versus those undergoing conventional treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of cycles was conducted from October 2017 to June 2019 to evaluate ovarian response in terms of the number of oocytes. The reproductive outcomes of the recipients were retrospectively analyzed later. SETTING: A university-affiliated private in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S): We randomly divided 318 donors into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The oocytes obtained were assigned to 364 recipients. One hundred sixty-one donors were treated with a daily dose of 10 mg of MPA administered orally from the beginning of ovarian stimulation (OS), and 156 were treated with a GnRH antagonist (initiated once the leading follicle reached a diameter of 13 mm). Transvaginal ultrasound was performed, and serum estradiol, luteinizing hormone, and progesterone levels were recorded during monitoring. The following additional parameters were analyzed: endocrine profile (in follicular fluid), number of metaphase II oocytes, and pregnancy outcome. INTERVENTION(S): The donors included in the study group were stimulated using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and MPA at 10 mg/day, simultaneously begun on cycle day 2 or 3. Ovulation was induced using a GnRH agonist when dominant follicles matured. A short protocol with ganirelix at 0.25 mg/day was used for the control group. Oocytes were assigned to the recipients, followed by routine in vitro fertilization procedures in which 1 embryo was usually transferred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measure was the numbers of oocytes and metaphase II oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone surge, serum and follicular fluid hormone profiles, and clinical pregnancy outcomes in the recipient group. RESULT(S): The number of oocytes retrieved was 21.4 ± 11.7 in the MPA group and 21.2 ± 9.2 in the antagonist group (mean difference 0.14; 95% confidence interval -2.233, 2.517). The total dose of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, duration of OS, and endocrine profiles of the serum and follicular fluids were comparable in the 2 groups. No early ovulation was observed in either group. No statistically significant differences with respect to implantation rate (68.1% in the MPA group vs. 62% in the antagonist group), clinical pregnancy rate (64.5% in the MPA group vs. 57.8 in the antagonist group), ongoing pregnancy rate (55.4% in the MPA group vs. 48.5% in the antagonist group), live birth rate (55.1% in the MPA group vs. 48.5% in the antagonist group), or cumulative live birth rate (73.8% in the MPA group vs. 70.7% in the antagonist group) were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION(S): The administration of MPA resulted in oocyte retrieval rates, endocrine profiles, viable embryo numbers, and pregnancy outcomes similar to those achieved with the GnRH antagonist. Therefore, MPA can be recommended for OS in oocyte donation because it permits a more patient-friendly approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03300960.