Prevalence of functional bowel disorders and faecal incontinence: an Australian primary care survey.

AIM: Interest in functional bowel disorders (FBDs) and faecal incontinence (FI) has increased amongst coloproctologists. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of FBDs and FI (including its severity) among Australian primary healthcare seekers using objective criteria. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a primary care setting in Sydney, Australia. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic information and diagnose FBDs (irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, functional bloating and functional diarrhoea) based on Rome III criteria. The severity of FI was determined using the Vaizey incontinence score. Associations with medical/surgical history and healthcare utilization were assessed. RESULTS: Of 596 subjects approached, 396 (66.4%) agreed to participate. Overall, 33% had FBD and/or FI. Irritable bowel syndrome was present in 11.1% and these participants were more likely to report anxiety/depression (P < 0.01) and to have had a previous colonoscopy (P < 0.001) or cholecystectomy (P = 0.02). Functional constipation was present in 8.1%, and functional bloating and functional diarrhoea were diagnosed in 6.1%, and 1.5%, respectively. FI was present in 12.1% with the majority (52%) reporting moderate/severe incontinence (Vaizey score > 8). Participants with FI were more likely to have irritable bowel syndrome, urinary incontinence and previous anal surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: FBDs and FI are prevalent conditions amongst primary healthcare seekers and the needs of those affected appear to be complex given their coexisting symptoms and conditions. Currently, the majority do not reach colorectal services, although increased awareness by primary care providers could lead to sufferers being referred for specialist management.

Prevalence and co-occurrence of upper and lower functional gastrointestinal symptoms in patients eligible for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is considered as a risk factor for many functional digestive disorders. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence and the association of functional digestive symptoms affecting the upper and the lower digestive tract in patients eligible for bariatric surgery. METHODS: Before surgery, 120 consecutive patients with normal upper endoscopy (7.5% males, mean BMI 44 ± 6 m/kg(2)) have filled a standard questionnaire in order to evaluate the presence of depressive symptoms and functional digestive disorders according to the Rome criteria. The major symptoms (esophageal, gastroduodenal, anorectal, and abdominal pain) were coded as dichotomous variables. Data analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression with a backwards selection procedure adjusted only for the variables that were significant in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Functional symptoms were present in 89% of the subjects (2.5 functional digestive symptoms/subject). Depression symptoms were found in 43% of the patients. Esophageal symptoms were independent predictors for the presence of gastric, bowel, and anorectal symptoms. Functional abdominal pain and bowel symptoms were present, respectively, in 19% and 84% of the patients. Approximately half of the patients have specific functional bowel disorders (28.6% constipation, 18% irritable bowel syndrome, 18% diarrhea, 1% bloating) and 35.7% have non-specific bowel disorders. Anorectal symptoms were found in 40% of the patients: difficult defecation in 32% and fecal incontinence in 9.8% of the patients. Depression was an independent predictor for anorectal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the high prevalence of functional bowel symptoms in patients complaining of morbid obesity.

Pain symptoms and stooling patterns do not drive diagnostic costs for children with functional abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome in primary or tertiary care.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to (1) compare the cost of medical evaluation for children with functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome brought to a pediatric gastroenterologist versus children who remained in the care of their pediatrician, (2) compare symptom characteristics for the children in primary versus tertiary care, and (3) examine if symptom characteristics predicted the cost of medical evaluation. METHODS: Eighty-nine children aged 7 to 10 years with functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome seen by a gastroenterologist (n = 46) or seen only by a pediatrician (n = 43) completed daily pain and stool diaries for 2 weeks. Mothers provided retrospective reports of their children's symptoms in the previous year. Cost of medical evaluation was calculated via chart review of diagnostic tests and application of prices as if the patients were self-pay. RESULTS: Child-reported diary data reflected no significant group differences with respect to pain, interference with activities, or stool characteristics. In contrast, mothers of children evaluated by a gastroenterologist viewed their children as having higher maximum pain intensity in the previous year. Excluding endoscopy costs, cost of medical evaluation was fivefold higher for children evaluated by a gastroenterologist, with higher cost across blood work, stool studies, breath testing, and diagnostic imaging. Symptom characteristics did not predict cost of care for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of difference in symptom characteristics between children in primary and tertiary care, a notable differential in cost of evaluation exists in accordance with level of care. Symptom characteristics do not seem to drive diagnostic evaluation in either primary or tertiary care. Given the lack of differences in child-reported symptoms and the maternal perspective that children evaluated by a gastroenterologist had more severe pain, we speculate that parent perception of child symptoms may be a primary factor in seeking tertiary care.

Abdominal bloating in employed adults: prevalence, risk factors, and association with other bowel disorders.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND Bloating is common, but its significance as a marker of underlying disease has not been defined. AND AIMS: We report on risk factors for bloating, its relationship to physical activity and quality of life (QOL), and its predictive value for functional bowel disorders. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional population-based study of 1,069 employees of the Veterans Affairs Black Hills Health Care System. The validated Bowel Disease Questionnaire was used to identify subjects with abdominal bloating and other bowel disorders. The association of bloating with QOL was assessed using the SF36 (Short-Form 36) questionnaire. Physical activity was assessed using the modified Baecke questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 72% (723 of 1,069). Bloating was reported by 21% of all subjects (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.7-23.7), 64% with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 35% with non-IBS constipation, 23% with non-IBS diarrhea, and 42% with dyspepsia. Functional bloating (i.e., bloating in the absence of other bowel disorders) was reported by 7% of subjects (95% CI 5.2-9.0). Of those with bloating, 28% had IBS, 25% non-IBS constipation, 8% non-IBS diarrhea, and 30% dyspepsia. The positive and negative predictive values of bloating in the diagnosis of functional bowel disorder were 66% and 87%, respectively. The only risk factors were smoking and high-dose aspirin. Bloating was not associated with physical activity. QOL on all subscales of SF36 was lower in subjects with bloating than those without bloating. CONCLUSIONS: Bloating is a common symptom in otherwise healthy adults, and is often associated with but not predictive of functional bowel disorders. Smoking and high-dose aspirin are associated with bloating while physical activity is not.

Corrección de prolapso rectal / correction rectal prolapse

Se presenta una panorámica de la operación de González Castellanos en el tratamiento de las pacientes con prolapso rectal. Nuestro estudio tiene dos objetivos: el primero, hacer una revisión de la literatura médica relacionada con esta patología y segundo, presentar nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento de pacientes con prolapso rectal.

Irritable bowel syndrome and the Rome III criteria: for better or for worse?

The paper by Sperber et al. in this issue is an early evaluation of the Rome III criteria against the Rome II criteria for irritable bowel syndrome that throws up several important observations. A three to four-fold increase was observed in irritable bowel syndrome prevalence with the Rome III criteria. Individuals with the Rome II criteria had more doctor visits, perception of stress and a negative global feeling. There could be a shift of individuals between irritable bowel syndrome and other functional bowel disorder diagnostic groups such as functional constipation and functional bloating. In this review, it is suggested that rigid application of the symptom frequency and duration requirements of the older Rome criteria could have introduced a selection bias for patients with greater psychological disturbance, and that this could have impacted negatively on our perception and management of irritable bowel syndrome. The findings of Sperber et al. suggest that the new Rome III criteria may enable us to pay more attention to the average irritable bowel syndrome patient we see in our clinics as opposed to the chronically severe patient. It is proposed that improved management of our average patient may translate into better outcomes in terms of reduction in specialist referral, unnecessary surgery and potentially harmful alternative treatments.

[Chronic heart failure: structural and microbiological changes in the colon].

AIM: To study microbiocenosis of the parietal layer of the colon and feces, concentrations of endotoxin and proinflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) of different functional classes vs. healthy subjects of the same age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial includes 37 patients with ischemic CHF and 13 healthy volunteers. The examination comprised 6-min walking test, echocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular ejection fraction, clinical state by a special scale, assay for C-reactive protein, endotoxin, fecal seeding, colonoscopy with biopsy and seeding. RESULTS: Gram-negative flora in the colon and parietal layer occurred in high concentrations correlating with severity of CHF. The examinees with CHF of functional class III-IV had elevated levels of circulating endotoxin and serum C-reactive protein.

Symptom patterns and relative distribution of functional bowel disorders in 1,023 gastroenterology patients in Iran.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are scanty data on functional bowel disorder (FBD) patterns in Iran. This first-time study tried to provide preliminary data on relative distribution of different types of FBD and their symptom patterns in Iranian patients. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 1,023 patients in an outpatient gastroenterology clinic in central Tehran was interviewed using two questionnaires based on Rome II criteria from December 2004 to May 2005 to detect FBD patients. RESULTS: Of 1,023 gastroenterology patients, 410 met Rome II criteria for FBD; functional constipation, 115 (28%); irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 110 (27%) [IBS-C, 29%; IBS-D, 11%; IBS-A, 60%]; functional bloating, 102 (25%); unspecified FBD, 76 (18%); and functional diarrhea, 7 (2%). FBD had no association with age or level of education, while it was more frequent in women (P=0.001). FBD was also more frequent among those with a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery (P=0.021). IBS patients had a lower mean of age compared with non-FBD group, while patients with constipation were older (Mann-Whitney U test, P=0.006). Constipation-related symptoms were the most frequent symptoms among IBS patients. Constipation (<3 defecations/week) was also the most frequent change in bowel habit in bloating and unspecified FBD patients. Fourteen percent of IBS consulters and 8.7% of functional constipation consulters met Rome II criteria for dyspepsia (disregarding the ruling out of upper gastrointestinal organic disease). Only 20% of patients with functional constipation were consulters. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based studies at provincial levels are essential to clarify FBD patterns in each provincial district in the country.

Functional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was 1) to determine the prevalence of functional bowel and anorectal disorders as defined by the Rome II criteria in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI), and (2) to determine if the extent of prolapse on gynecologic examination is related to the subtypes of constipation or any functional anorectal pain disorder. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred and two consecutive female subjects presenting to a tertiary urogynecology clinic were enrolled. Demographic, general medical, and physical examination information, including POPQ measurements and a standardized sacral neurologic evaluation, were collected. The prevalence of functional disorders of the bowel, rectum, and anus as defined by the Rome II criteria were collected using the Rome II Modular questionnaire. Relationships of functional disorders to various components of the vaginal examination were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent (108/302) met the criteria for constipation, including the following subtypes: 19% outlet constipation, 5% functional constipation, 5% constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and 7% IBS-outlet. Nineteen percent (56/302) of subjects had IBS or 1 of its subtypes. Functional diarrhea was seen in 6% (17/302), fecal incontinence in 19% (58/302), and anorectal pain disorders in 25% (77/302). After controlling for age, parity, diabetes, constipating medications, and previous pelvic surgery, there were no differences in the prevalence of constipation or any of its subtypes between patients with UI and those with stage 3 or 4 POP. Fecal incontinence was independently associated with UI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.3; 95% CI 2.6-19.1), but not advanced POP. Neither overall stage of POP nor stage of posterior vaginal prolapse was significantly associated with any of the functional bowel disorders, including constipation and its subtypes. Perineal body measurement was significantly longer in patients with outlet type constipation (mean 3.5 +/- 0.6 cm vs 3.1 +/- 0.9 cm, P < .01) and in those with proctalgia fugax (mean 3.4 +/- 1.0 vs 3.1 +/- 0.8, P < .05). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of constipation and anorectal pain disorders in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. However, patients with stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse have similar rates of constipation compared with those with urinary incontinence. Constipation and its subtypes are not related to the stage of pelvic organ prolapse. It appears that either constipation is not a significant contributor to prolapse, or constipation contributes equally to the development of both urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Aplicação dos critérios de Roma II para síndrome do intestino irritável (SII) em grupo populacional da Região Amazônica - Oriximiná. Pará, Brasil / Aplication of Rome II criteria for the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in a population group of the Amazon Region - Oriximiná, Pará, Brazil

A síndrome do intestino irritável (SII), doença funcional do trato gastrointestinal(TGI)exibe alta prevalência mundial e complexo manuseio clínico. De etiologia multifatorial, é citada pela maioria dos autores como uma das doenças mais comuns do trato gastro intestinal, responsável por 50 por cento das consultas de gastroenterologia. Sintomas consistentes com SII parecem estar presentes em 15por cento a 20por cento da população em geral. O presente estudo teve por objetivo determinar a prevalência do diagnóstico da SII em um grupo de voluntários residentes em Oriximiná, Pará, Região Amazônica, Brasil. Após consentimento informado, 93 pessoas no município de Oriximiná foram avaliadas, através de questionário. As variáveis incluidas no questionário foram: hábitos intestinais, doença intestinal orgânica e utilização dos critérios de Roma II para o diagnóstico de SII. Dezesseis entrevistados (14,8por cento) preencheram os critérios clínicos para o SII. Quando os dados clínicos e demográficos desse grupo foram comparados com os dos entrevistados sem o diagnóstico de SII, não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p>0,005). Os resultados mostram que a avaliação de um grupo populacional urbano-rural não modificou a prevalência da SII nos entrevistados, nem as caracteristicas dos dados demográficos, quamdo comparados com a literatura nacional e internacional. Esses resultados enriquecem os escassos dados da literatura nacional e acrescentam dados sobre o estudo da SII na população em geral, selecionados fora das unidades de saúde

Chronic diffuse musculoskeletal pain, fibromyalgia and co-morbid unexplained clinical conditions.

This chapter reviews our current knowledge on the presence of overlapping syndromes in one form of chronic diffuse pain, fibromyalgia. Patients with fibromyalgia often present with signs and symptoms of other unexplained clinical conditions, including chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, temporomandibular disorders, and multiple chemical sensitivities. The high prevalence, impact on function and opportunities for treatment underscore the need for clinicians and researchers to screen routinely for co-morbid unexplained clinical conditions among persons with fibromyalgia. We, therefore, describe a simple approach to screening for such conditions in accordance with published criteria. Interventions should directly address both fibromyalgia symptoms and co-morbid unexplained clinical conditions, as well as the multiple factors that propagate pain, fatigue and limitations in function.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases in two British national birth cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the prevalence of multiple gastrointestinal diseases in the general British population. AIM: To examine the prevalence of Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gall stones (GS), and peptic ulcer disease (PUD). SUBJECTS: The 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) and the National Child Development Study (NCDS) are two one week national birth cohorts born in 1970 and 1958, respectively. All cohort members living in Great Britain were interviewed in 1999/2000. METHODS: The prevalence rates of the five diseases were calculated, and associations with sex and childhood social class were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: At age 30 years, the prevalence rates per 10,000 (95% confidence interval (CI)) in the 1970 and 1958 cohorts, respectively, were: CD 38 (26-49), 21 (13-30); UC 30 (20-41), 27 (18-37); IBS 826 (775-877), 290 (267-330); GS 88 (71-106), 78 (62-94); and PUD 244 (214-273), 229 (201-256). There was a significantly higher proportion with CD (p=0.023) and IBS (p=0.000) in the 1970 cohort compared with the 1958 cohort at age 30 years. Comparing the cohorts in the 1999/2000 sweep, UC, GS, and PUD were significantly (p=0.001, p=0.000, p=0.000) more common in the 1958 cohort. There was a statistically significant trend for a higher risk of GS with lower social class in both cohorts combined (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: The study indicates an increasing temporal trend in the prevalence of CD and suggests a period effect in IBS, possibly due to adult life exposures or variation in recognition and diagnosis of IBS.

Brain responses to visceral and somatic stimuli in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with and without fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: Symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and fibromyalgia (FM) commonly coexist. We hypothesized that one of the mechanisms underlying this comorbidity is increased activation of brain regions concerned with the processing and modulation of visceral and somatic afferent information, in particular subregions of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). METHODS: Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was assessed in age-matched female IBS (n = 10) and IBS + FM (n = 10) subjects using H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography during noxious visceral (rectal) and somatic pressure stimuli. RESULTS: GI symptom severity was significantly higher in the IBS patients compared with the IBS + FM patients (p < 0.05). In addition, IBS + FM patients rated somatic pain as more intense than their abdominal pain (p < 0.05). Whereas the somatic stimulus was less unpleasant than the visceral stimulus for IBS patients without FM, the somatic and visceral stimuli were equally unpleasant in the IBS + FM group. Group differences in regional brain activation were entirely within the middle subregion of the ACC. There was a greater rCBF increase in response to noxious visceral stimuli in IBS patients and to somatic stimuli in IBS + FM patients. CONCLUSION: Chronic stimulus-specific enhancement of ACC responses to sensory stimuli in both syndromes may be associated with cognitive enhancement of either visceral (IBS) or somatic (IBS + FM) sensory input and may play a key pathophysiologic role in these chronic pain syndromes.

Gastrointestinal dysfunction in a community sample of subjects with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects about 15-20% of the population of the Western countries. Traditionally, IBS has been an exclusion diagnosis, but recently definitions have emerged from population-based research. The aim of this population-based study was to evaluate any association between gastrointestinal pathophysiology and IBS in subjects with symptoms of IBS compared to subjects with no abdominal complaints. METHODS: From a random sample of 2,656 participants, subjects with IBS (32) together with subjects without abdominal complaints (26), were invited for further evaluation. IBS was defined as more than weekly experience of abdominal pain and distension, and in addition either borborygmia or altering stool consistency. The diagnostic work-up consisted of gastroscopy, manometry and 23-hour pH and pressure recordings of the oesophagus, lactose tolerance test, barium enema, measurement of colonic transit time, and rectoscopy. RESULTS: Compared to the group without abdominal complaints significantly more subjects with IBS had spasms of the colon (OR = 10.2 (1.2-87.3)), and abnormal contractions of the oesophagus at manometry (OR = 9.1 (1.1-78.2)). Furthermore, there was a non-significant tendency towards spasms at 23-hour pH and pressure recordings (OR = 3.58 (0.4-35.2)), and more discomfort at lactose tolerance test (OR = 5.8 (0.6-51.3)) in persons with IBS compared to subjects without abdominal complaints. CONCLUSION: The results of this population-based study indicate that signs of gastrointestinal dysmotility and hyperperception are more prevalent in subjects with IBS than in subjects without abdominal complaints.

Systematic review: Abdominal and pelvic surgery in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

AIM: To systematically review research on the prevalence of abdominal and pelvic surgery in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS: Computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Current Contents were performed independently by both investigators to identify appropriate studies. Primary study selection criteria included: (i) population-based samples of adult irritable bowel syndrome patients; (ii) the use of appropriate symptom-based criteria to identify irritable bowel syndrome patients; and (iii) comparison of the prevalence of abdominal and pelvic surgery in irritable bowel syndrome patients vs. control populations. Secondary analysis was performed on published studies of referral populations and case series. RESULTS: Two population-based studies met the primary study selection criteria and revealed an increased prevalence of surgery in irritable bowel syndrome patients vs. controls for cholecystectomy (4.6% vs. 2.4%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.2) and hysterectomy (18% vs. 12%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.2). Secondary analysis revealed an increased prevalence of appendectomy and other abdominal and pelvic surgery in irritable bowel syndrome patients. CONCLUSIONS: Irritable bowel syndrome is associated with a disproportionately high prevalence of abdominal and pelvic surgery, but most studies exhibit sub-optimal study design and do not define the factors causing the increased prevalence of surgery in these patients.

Family study of affective spectrum disorder.

BACKGROUND: Affective spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a group of psychiatric and medical conditions, each known to respond to several chemical families of antidepressant medications and hence possibly linked by common heritable abnormalities. Forms of ASD include major depressive disorder (MDD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, bulimia nervosa, cataplexy, dysthymic disorder, fibromyalgia, generalized anxiety disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, migraine, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and social phobia. Two predictions of the ASD hypothesis were tested: that ASD, taken as a single entity, would aggregate in families and that MDD would coaggregate with other forms of ASD in families. METHODS: Probands with and without MDD, together with their first-degree relatives, were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and a supplemental interview for other forms of ASD. The familial aggregation and coaggregation of disorders were analyzed using proband predictive logistic regression models, including a novel bivariate model for the presence or absence of each of 2 disorders in a relative as predicted by the presence or absence of each of 2 disorders in the associated proband. RESULTS: In the 178 interviewed relatives of 64 probands with MDD and 152 relatives of 58 probands without MDD, the estimated odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the familial aggregation of ASD as a whole was 2.5 (1.4-4.3; P =.001) and for the familial coaggregation of MDD with at least one other form of ASD was 1.9 (1.1-3.2; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Affective spectrum disorder aggregates strongly in families, and MDD displays a significant familial coaggregation with other forms of ASD, taken collectively. These results suggest that forms of ASD may share heritable pathophysiologic features.

Gender differences in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal discomfort or pain associated with changes in stool frequency and/or stool form. It is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in both primary care and gastroenterology clinics. IBS is associated with high health care costs, disability, work absenteeism, and significant morbidity. In this article, we review the gender differences in epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, physiology, psychological features, and responses to therapy of IBS.

Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common disorder seen in gastroenterology practice. It is also a large component of primary care practices. Although the classic IBS symptoms of lower abdominal pain, bloating, and alteration of bowel habits is easily recognizable to most physicians, diagnosing IBS remains a challenge. This is in part caused by the absence of anatomic or physiologic markers. For this reason, the diagnosis of IBS currently needs to be made on clinical grounds. A number of symptom-based diagnostic criteria have been proposed over the last 15 years. The most recent of these, the Rome II criteria, seem to show reasonable sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing IBS. However, the role of the Rome II criteria in clinical practice remains ill defined. A review of the literature shows that, in patients with no alarm symptoms, the Rome criteria have a positive predictive value of approximately 98%, and that additional diagnostic tests have a yield of 2% or less. Diagnostic evaluation should also include a psychosocial assessment specifically addressing any history of sexual or physical abuse because these issues significantly influence management strategies and treatment success.

Irritable bowel syndrome in the elderly.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent and frequently lifelong gastrointestinal disorder, but whether advancing age impacts on IBS is largely unknown and how the disorder manifests in the elderly remains unclear. Epidemiological studies suggest that the prevalence of IBS declines with age (possibly related to pain perception changes), but IBS remains a common gastrointestinal illness in the aged. Unfortunately, there has been very little research examining risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of IBS in the elderly. Since gastrointestinal cancer increases with age, diagnostic algorithms differ in the elderly. There is reason to believe that this very prevalent disorder may also behave differently in the elderly and that the approach to management needs to take age-related issues into account. These issues will be the focus of the present review.

Systematic review of the comorbidity of irritable bowel syndrome with other disorders: what are the causes and implications?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Comorbid or extraintestinal symptoms occur frequently with irritable bowel syndrome and account for up to three fourths of excess health care visits. This challenges the assumption that irritable bowel is a distinct disorder. The aims of this study were to (1) assess comorbidity in 3 areas: gastrointestinal disorders, psychiatric disorders, and nongastrointestinal somatic disorders; and (2) evaluate explanatory hypotheses. METHODS: The scientific literature since 1966 in all languages cited in Medline was systematically reviewed. RESULTS: Comorbidity with other functional gastrointestinal disorders is high and may be caused by shared pathophysiological mechanisms such as visceral hypersensitivity. Psychiatric disorders, especially major depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders, occur in up to 94%. The nongastrointestinal nonpsychiatric disorders with the best-documented association are fibromyalgia (median of 49% have IBS), chronic fatigue syndrome (51%), temporomandibular joint disorder (64%), and chronic pelvic pain (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate statistical analyses suggest that these are distinct disorders and not manifestations of a common somatization disorder, but their strong comorbidity suggests a common feature important to their expression, which is most likely psychological. Some models explain the comorbidity of irritable bowel with other disorders by suggesting that each disorder is the manifestation of varying combinations of interacting physiological and psychological factors. An alternative hypothesis is that the irritable bowel diagnosis is applied to a heterogeneous group of patients, some of whom have a predominantly psychological etiology, whereas others have a predominantly biological etiology, and that the presence of multiple comorbid disorders is a marker for psychological influences on etiology.