Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper.

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Gynecology: A Review of the Literature.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), or "fast-track" protocol, aims to minimize the physiologic stress of surgery and optimize the rehabilitation of patients. However, there is limited data in obstetrics and gynecology. We reviewed the published literature on ERAS programs in gynecology to evaluate the outcomes and potential key elements for a successful program. Fifty studies were evaluated. We recommend preoperative counseling to the patient, no bowel preparation, an opioid-sparing multimodal approach to pain management, goal-directed fluid management, minimally invasive surgery when possible, and early mobilization and feeding. This is a multidisciplinary team effort and requires active patient participation in the process.

[The modern applications of radon therapy for the medical rehabilitation of the patients].

Radon therapy is one of the methods of physiobalneotherapy the mechanism of action of which is believed to consist of the influence of the small radiation doses of radon and its daughter products on the nervous, vascular, and immune apparatuses of the skin and mucosal membranes that eventually enhances the protective and adaptive potential of the body and thereby its ability to resist pathological impacts. At present, the high effectiveness of radon therapy is universally recognized and this method is widely applied for the combined treatment of various diseases in different fields of medicine. These include (1) diseases of the musculoskeletal system and locomotor disorders in the patients presenting with recurrent rheumatic fever, reactive arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, post-traumatic osteoarthrosis and knee joint synovitis, the sympathico-tonic course of vegetative dystonia associated with connective tissue dysplasia, etc.; (2) neurological disorders in the patients presenting with cervical dorsopathy, neurological manifedstations of degenerative lesions of the cervical and lumbar spine, etc.; (3) cardiological disorders in the patients presenting with hypertensive disease, coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis of different localization, etc.; (4) gastrointestinal disorders in the patients presenting with gastric and duodenal ulcers, irritated bowel syndrome, etc.; (5) gynecological problems in the patients presenting with primary and secondary dysmenorrhea, genital endometriosis, uterine myoma, dysregulated reproductive function, polycystic ovary - syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome and ovulatory disorders of proinflammatory origin, etc.

Clinical management of HPV-related disease of the lower genital tract.

Cytology remains the mainstay for cervical screening. The need to achieve effective management, limit complications, and preserve reproductive function led to the popularity of local treatment. Although the cure rates for ablative and excisional methods are similar, the excisional method provides a more reliable histopathological diagnosis. Recent evidence revealed increased perinatal morbidity after treatment that appears to be related to the proportion of cervix removed. The human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test appears to enhance the detection of disease in primary screening, in the triage of minor cytological abnormalities, and in follow-up. Further research on the clinical application of a scoring system is ongoing. The vaccines are now available and appear to be safe, well tolerated, and highly efficacious in HPV naive women. A synergy of vaccination and screening will be required. Treatment for early cervical cancer is increasingly shifting toward more fertility-sparing surgical techniques. Careful selection of patients is essential.

Psychological and physical factors influencing the health-related quality of life of patients of a department of gynecology in a university hospital.

The aim of our study was to assess the physical and mental quality of life of in-patients of a Gynecological University Hospital and the factors influencing the quality of life. 715 women, who were treated in hospital with non-malignant or malignant gynecological or obstetrical diseases, took part in the study. Besides demographical data and relevant medical parameters the quality of life (SF-12), anxiety and depression (HADS) as well as physical discomforts (GBB) were assessed. The physical quality of life of the study population was significantly lower than that of the normal population (p < 0.001). Patients with obstetric diseases in comparison with patients with malignant gynecological and other gynecological diseases had the lowest physical quality of life. Regarding the mental factor, patients with malignant gynecological diseases feel most impaired, followed by those with other gynecological and obstetrical conditions. The multivariate analysis of the quality of life showed that up to 60% of the variance could be explained. The lowest variance elucidation was found in obstetrical patients in whom the physical complaints elucidated only a small part of the variance. Our results show on the one hand the high impairment of mental and especially of physical quality of life in women who are in hospital with gynecological or obstetrical diseases. On the other hand they show the great significance of the quality of life as an outcome parameter. These findings should be considered in gynecological in-patient treatments by using integrated psychosomatic care.

Survey of clinical practice: pre- and postoperative physiotherapy for pelvic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this survey was to obtain information about current physiotherapy practice for patients undergoing pelvic surgery. The aims were to evaluate whether differences exist in service provision between women's health physiotherapists (WHPTs) and hospital physiotherapists (HPTs) and in the guidelines used by physiotherapists to direct their service delivery. METHODS. A questionnaire was posted to the members of the Victorian Continence and Women's Health Physiotherapy Group (n = 130) and physiotherapists working in metropolitan and rural hospitals (n = 90). The questionnaire comprised questions relating to the aspects of treatment, including how referrals are made, funding, interventions provided and how they are delivered, and use of outcome measures. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis of differences between WHPTs and HPTs. RESULTS: The response rate was 75.9%. In 67% of cases, service delivery was initiated by surgeon request, and most commonly for gynecologic patients (85%). Individual consultations were used on 96% of occasions and 8% were group sessions. Content of physiotherapy treatment for in-patients varied, with WHPTs significantly more likely to prescribe pelvic floor muscle exercises (P = 0.003), bowel advice (P = 0.001), avoidance of risk activities (P = 0.002), and awareness of postoperative symptoms (P = 0.001). Conversely, HPTs were significantly more likely to perform respiratory checks (P = 0.002) and mobilization (P = 0.001). Eighty-seven percent of respondents regarded their service as suboptimal, citing the need for evidence to support the content and best timing of intervention. CONCLUSION: Differences exist in physiotherapy treatment for pelvic surgery patients. Further research is required to establish whether, and which, elements of physiotherapy intervention are effective.