Using Pain Medication Intensity to Stratify Back Pain Among Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of musculoskeletal back pain among older adults stratified by pain medication intensity to 1) review treatment patterns and 2) consider targeted back pain prevention interventions. METHODS: A random sample of older adults age 64 years and older was utilized to identify new and recurring back pain. Prescription pain medications from drug claims were used to stratify to five unique intensity levels. The characteristics of each level were determined using regression models. RESULTS: About 10% had musculoskeletal back pain. Of these, 54% (N = 20,645) had new back pain and 46% (N = 17,252) had recurring back pain. Overall, about 35% received physical therapy. Pain medication intensity levels included no prescription pain medications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants, low-dose opioids, and high-dose opioids (new back pain: 39%, 10%, 6%, 23%, and 23%, respectively; recurring back pain 32%, 9%, 4%, 17%, and 38%, respectively). NSAID and muscle relaxant users were younger, healthier, and received physical therapy. Opioid users were younger, in poorer health, used sleep medications, received physical therapy, and had more falls and higher health care utilization and expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: New and recurring back pain patients can be stratified by pain medication intensity to review treatment patterns and target back pain prevention programs. Those with back pain but taking no prescription pain medications may benefit from back pain prevention programs. More research on guidelines for treatment options for those on high levels of pain medications is warranted.

Reliability of the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: An updated summary of the evidence for the reliability of the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) system in patients with spinal pain is needed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the evidence on the intrarater and interrater reliability of MDT in patients with spinal pain. METHODS: Searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PEDro, and Scopus were conducted for this systematic review. We included any study design as long as reliability of the MDT method was tested in patients with spinal pain. We collected data on the reliability of MDT to identify main and subsyndromes, directional preference, the centralization phenomenon, and lateral shift. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability and the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies checklists. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included (8 studies on back pain, pooled n = 2160 patients; 3 studies on neck pain, pooled n = 45 patients; and 3 studies recruited mixed spinal conditions, pooled n = 389 patients). Studies investigating patients with back pain reported kappa estimates ranging from 0.26 to 1.00 (main and subsyndromes), 0.27 to 0.90 (directional preference), and 0.11 to 0.70 (centralization phenomenon). Kappa estimates for studies investigating neck pain ranged from 0.47 to 0.84 (main and subsyndromes) and 0.46 (directional preference). In mixed populations, kappa estimates ranged from 0.56 to 0.96 (main and subsyndromes). CONCLUSION: The MDT system appears to have acceptable interrater reliability for classifying patients with back pain into main and subsyndromes when applied by therapists who have completed the credentialing examination, but unacceptable reliability in other therapists. We found conflicting evidence regarding the reliability of the MDT system in patients with neck pain or mixed pain locations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(12):923-933. Epub 22 Jun 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7876.

[Evaluation of Inpatient Conservative Management of Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Back Pain]. / Evaluation einer stationären nicht operativen Behandlung von akuten, subakuten und chronischen Rückenschmerzen.

BACKGROUND: Backache is very common in the German population. It is a common reason for people to seek medical advice and specific back pain programs have been developed. The intention of this study is to evaluate the short and long term effects of conservative management of back pain in a German general hospital. Outcomes of interest were pain intensity, interference in daily functions, physical functioning and health related quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 1010 patients with acute, subacute and chronic back pain, admitted to inpatient nonsurgical interventional therapy in a German hospital between July 2013 and July 2015. Outcomes were assessed at the end of the inpatient treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up, using Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain and daily function, the Hannover Ability Questionnaire for Measuring Back Pain-Related Functional Limitations (FFbH - R) and the German Version of the EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D) for measuring health-related quality of life. The baseline questionnaire also included questions on the risk of developing long-term disability following back pain (HKF-R 10) for acute and subacute cases and the Mainz Pain Staging System (MPSS) for patients with chronic back pain. The return rate was 54% after 3 months, 38% after 6 months and 27% at 12 months follow-up. The results from the follow-up measurements (T2 - T5) were compared to the pre-treatment results (T1). Because of missing or insufficiently normal distributions nonparametric paired Wilcoxon tests were used to test differences over time for each variable. Level of significance was adjusted for multiple testing. In addition, effect sizes were computed to estimate the clinical relevance of statistically significant results. RESULTS: Pain intensity and impact of pain on daily function were significantly lower at the end of the inpatient treatment (T2). The results remained largely stable at the 3, 6 and 12 month follow-ups. Significant improvements were found in physical functioning and health-related quality of life. These improvements were maintained equally at the 3, 6 and 12 month follow-ups. In consequence, working ability increased during the follow-up period. Calculated effect sizes showed large effects for pain intensity, interference and quality of life (r = 0.51 to 0.85) and predominately moderate effects (r = 0.45 to 0.62) for physical functioning at all measurement points. The percentage of patients who had an operation due to continuing back pain after conservative treatment was 7.8, 9.9, and 12.3 at the 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Persistent effects of inpatient conservative treatment of back pain were found for all outcome variables. The specific approach appears to be effective in conservative treatment programs of back pain. In the end, it's not about the alternative of surgery or conservative treatment for back pain. Treatment has to be coordinated with the patient in terms of participative decisions.

Trial of Pregabalin for Acute and Chronic Sciatica.

BACKGROUND: Sciatica can be disabling, and evidence regarding medical treatments is limited. Pregabalin is effective in the treatment of some types of neuropathic pain. This study examined whether pregabalin may reduce the intensity of sciatica. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pregabalin in patients with sciatica. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either pregabalin at a dose of 150 mg per day that was adjusted to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day or matching placebo for up to 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the leg-pain intensity score on a 10-point scale (with 0 indicating no pain and 10 the worst possible pain) at week 8; the leg-pain intensity score was also evaluated at week 52, a secondary time point for the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the extent of disability, back-pain intensity, and quality-of-life measures at prespecified time points over the course of 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients underwent randomization, of whom 108 received pregabalin and 101 received placebo; after randomization, 2 patients in the pregabalin group were determined to be ineligible and were excluded from the analyses. At week 8, the mean unadjusted leg-pain intensity score was 3.7 in the pregabalin group and 3.1 in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference, 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.2 to 1.2; P=0.19). At week 52, the mean unadjusted leg-pain intensity score was 3.4 in the pregabalin group and 3.0 in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference, 0.3; 95% CI, -0.5 to 1.0; P=0.46). No significant between-group differences were observed with respect to any secondary outcome at either week 8 or week 52. A total of 227 adverse events were reported in the pregabalin group and 124 in the placebo group. Dizziness was more common in the pregabalin group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pregabalin did not significantly reduce the intensity of leg pain associated with sciatica and did not significantly improve other outcomes, as compared with placebo, over the course of 8 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the pregabalin group than in the placebo group. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; PRECISE Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12613000530729 .).

Clinical presentation of patients suffering from recent onset chronic inflammatory back pain suggestive of spondyloarthritis: The DESIR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: DESIR is a prospective longitudinal multicentric French cohort of patients with inflammatory back pain suggestive of spondyloarthritis, with a 10-year-follow-up. The purpose is to evaluate the performances of the different sets of classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, and to describe the frequency and characteristics of the clinical features of axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS: Demographic data and items allowing classification and indices calculation were collected, as well as biologic and imaging data. Baseline data are analyzed. The performance of the several classification criteria sets was evaluated (likelihood ratio) with the physician's diagnosis as external gold standard. For the clinical presentation of axial spondyloarthritis, a descriptive analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Seven hundred and eight patients are included. Ninety-two percent of them satisfy at least one set of classification criteria: mNY 26%, Amor 79%, ESSG 78%, ASAS 70%; physician's confidence level 6.8±2.7. 81 and 83% of patients fulfil modified (including MRI) Amor or ESSG criteria. Axial involvement is present in 100% of the cases. NSAIDs are taken by 90%, with an NSAID sore of 50±46. BASDAI over 40 is noted in 60% and elevated CRP in 30% of the cases. HLA-B27 is present in 58%. According to ASDAS CRP levels, 12.7% are in inactive disease, 63% in high disease activity; mean BASFI was 30. Peripheral involvement is present in 57%, with arthritis in 37% of these. Enthesitis is noted in 49% of the patients, and first symptom in 22.5%; anterior chest wall involvement is noted in 44.6%, and dactylitis in 13%. For extra articular manifestations, psoriasis is recorded in 16%, uveitis in 8.5% and IBD in 5.1%. Smoking is present in 36.3% and hypertension in 5.1% of the cases. CONCLUSION: These data represent the base of evaluation of the follow-up of this cohort, allowing future specific studies.

Matching patients to an intervention for back pain: classifying patients using a latent class approach.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Classification of patients with back pain in order to inform treatments is a long-standing aim in medicine. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to classify patients with low back pain and investigate whether different classes responded differently to a cognitive behavioural intervention. The objective was to provide additional guidance on the use of cognitive behavioural therapy to both patients and clinicians. METHOD: We used data from 407 participants from the full study population of 701 with complete data at baseline for the variables the intervention was designed to affect and complete data at 12 months for important outcomes. Patients were classified using LCA, and a link between class membership and outcome was investigated. For comparison, the latent class partition was compared with a commonly used classification system called Subgroups for Targeted Treatment (STarT). RESULTS: Of the relatively parsimonious models tested for association between class membership and outcome, an association was only found with one model which had three classes. For the trial participants who received the intervention, there was an association between class membership and outcome, but not for those who did not receive the intervention. However, we were unable to detect an effect on outcome from interaction between class membership and the intervention. The results from the comparative classification system were similar. CONCLUSION: We were able to classify the trial participants based on psychosocial baseline scores relevant to the intervention. An association between class membership and outcome was identified for those people receiving the intervention, but not those in the control group. However, we were not able to identify outcome associations for individual classes and so predict outcome in order to aid clinical decision making. For this cohort of patients, the STarT system was as successful, but not superior.

The classification and diagnostic criteria of ankylosing spondylitis.

Ankylosing spondylitis is the prototype of immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases grouped under the term spondyloarthritis (SpA). An early diagnosis has now become increasingly important because effective therapies are available and anti-TNF drugs are even more effective if used in early stages of the disease. In ankylosing spondylitis, the 1984 modified New York criteria have been used widely in clinical studies and daily practice but are not applicable in early disease when the characteristic radiographic signs of sacroiliitis are not visible but active sacroiliitis is readily detectable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus there has been a need for new classification or diagnostic criteria to identify inflammatory spondyloarthritis at early stage of the disease. This led to the concept of axial SpA to include the entire spectrum of patients with axial disease both, with and without radiographic damage. New classification criteria for the wider group of SpA have been proposed by ASAS (Assessment of Spondylo Arthritis International Society); and the patients are sub-grouped into (1) a predominantly axial disease, termed axial SpA including AS and non-radiographic axial SpA; (2) peripheral SpA. The clinical course and disease process of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis remains unclear. However the development of the SpA criteria by ASAS particularly for axial SpA, is an important step for early diagnosis and better management of these patients.

Postural compensations and subjective complaints due to backpack loads and wear time in schoolchildren.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effects of carrying weighted backpacks of up to 20% of body weight on the posture and pain complaints of elementary-school children. METHODS: Craniovertebral, forward trunk lean and pelvic tilt angles were measured from sagittal photographs of 62 children (8-11 years old) before and after walking while carrying backpacks containing 10%, 15%, or 20% of body weight. Pain severity after a 6-minute walk with the loaded backpack was recorded. Subjective complaints of pain were assessed using a visual analog scale after walking. RESULTS: Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in postural angles and increased complaints of pain after walking with increased backpack loads. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that typical backpack loads create worsening postural changes due to backpack loads and time spent carrying those loads, putting children at increased risk for injury and pain, the latter of which is a strong predictor for back pain in adulthood.

Reliability of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and stability of the MPI classification system in chronic back pain.

BACKGROUND: This cross validation study examined the reliability of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) and the stability of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory Classification System of the empirically derived subgroup classification obtained by cluster analysis in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Reliability of the German Multidimensional Pain Inventory was only examined once in the past in a small sample. Previous international studies mainly involving fibromyalgia patients showed that retest resulted in 33-38% of patients being assigned to a different Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroup classification. METHODS: Participants were 204 persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain (82% chronic non-specific back pain). Subgroup classification was conducted by cluster analysis at 4 weeks before entry (=test) and at entry into the pain management program (=retest) using Multidimensional Pain Inventory scale scores. No therapeutic interventions in this period were conducted. Reliability was quantified by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and stability by kappa coefficients (κ). RESULTS: Reliability of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory scales was least with ICC = 0.57 for the scale life control and further ranged from ICC = 0.72 (negative mood) to 0.87 (solicitous responses) in the other scales. At retest, 82% of the patients in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory cluster interpersonally distressed (κ = 0.69), 80% of the adaptive copers (κ = 0.58), and 75% of the dysfunctional patients (κ = 0.70) did not change classification. In total, 22% of the patients changed Multidimensional Pain Inventory cluster group, mainly into the adaptive copers subgroup. CONCLUSION: Test-retest reliability of the German Multidimensional Pain Inventory was moderate to good and comparable to other language versions. Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroup classification is substantially stable in chronic back pain patients when compared to other diagnostic groups and other examiner-based subgroup Classification Systems. The MPI Classification System can be recommended for reliable and stable specification of subgroups in observational and interventional studies in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Differences in pain, function and coping in Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroups of chronic back pain: a one-group pretest-posttest study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-specific back pain are not a homogeneous group but heterogeneous with regard to their bio-psycho-social impairments. This study examined a sample of 173 highly disabled patients with chronic back pain to find out how the three subgroups based on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) differed in their response to an inpatient pain management program. METHODS: Subgroup classification was conducted by cluster analysis using MPI subscale scores at entry into the program. At program entry and at discharge after four weeks, participants completed the MPI, the MOS Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Pairwise analyses of the score changes of the mentioned outcomes of the three MPI subgroups were performed using the Mann-Whitney-U-test for significance. RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified three MPI subgroups in this highly disabled sample: a dysfunctional, interpersonally distressed and an adaptive copers subgroup. The dysfunctional subgroup (29% of the sample) showed the highest level of depression in SF-36 mental health (33.4 ± 13.9), the interpersonally distressed subgroup (35% of the sample) a modest level of depression (46.8 ± 20.4), and the adaptive copers subgroup (32% of the sample) the lowest level of depression (57.8 ± 19.1). Significant differences in pain reduction and improvement of mental health and coping were observed across the three MPI subgroups, i.e. the effect sizes for MPI pain reduction were: 0.84 (0.44-1.24) for the dysfunctional subgroup, 1.22 (0.86-1.58) for the adaptive copers subgroup, and 0.53 (0.24-0.81) for the interpersonally distressed subgroup (p = 0.006 for pairwise comparison). Significant score changes between subgroups concerning activities and physical functioning could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS: MPI subgroup classification showed significant differences in score changes for pain, mental health and coping. These findings underscore the importance of assessing individual differences to understand how patients adjust to chronic back pain.

[Intensity of limb pain and fatigue in fibromyalgia syndrome, depressive disorders and chronic back pain. A criterion for differentiation]. / Intensität von Gliederschmerzen und Erschöpfung bei Fibromyalgiesyndrom, depressiven Störungen und chronischen Rückenschmerzen. Ein Unterscheidungskriterium.

BACKGROUND: A symptom-based diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) without tender point examination is needed for primary care. We tested if a symptom-based diagnosis of FMS can be founded on the intensity of the symptoms musculoskeletal pain and fatigue. METHODS: FMS patients from 4 different settings (n=464 members of the German Fibromyalgia Association DFV, n=33 from a private practice of rheumatology, n=36 from a tertiary care pain department, n=162 from medical expertise), patients with depressive disorders from 2 different settings (n=24 from a university department of psychiatry, n=311 from an out-patient university psychosomatic department), patients with chronic back pain from an out-patient training center (n=691) and persons from a representative German population sample (n=1977) were compared using the subscales of the Giessen subjective complaints list GBB 24. RESULTS: The greatest mean differences between FMS patients and the other samples were found within the subscales "limb pains" and "fatigue". FMS patients scored higher in the subscales "heart problems" and "dyspepsia", but both subscales did not contribute to a differentiation of the samples. The rates of reclassification of the subsamples based on the subscales "limb pains" and "fatigue" ranged between 80 and 93%. CONCLUSION: High levels of the intensity of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain and chronic fatigue may form the basis of a symptom-based diagnosis of FMS.

[Therapy of patients with chronic back pain. Prescriptions--contentment--outcome]. / Therapie bei Patienten mit Rückenschmerzen. Verordnungsverhalten--subjektive Zufriedenheit--Effekte.

Chronic back pain is a frequent complaint in out-patient orthopaedic practice. National (DEGAM; German Society of General Medicine and Family Medicine) and international guidelines provide recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Regulation of the behaviour of treating orthopaedists in the context of the therapy is so far little known.In this survey it was investigated which treatments are prescribed, whether there is a link between regulations and stage of chronification and whether the subjective effects correspond to objective results. Questionnaires relating to patient anamnesis were sent to 235 orthopaedic practices and a second questionnaire was sent to all patients who took part in the survey 6 months later. A total of 630 data sets could be evaluated.It was shown that primarily passive therapies (physiotherapy, drug therapy, injections and tablets) are mostly prescribed (physiotherapy, medications, injections) and that more therapies are used with increasing stages of chronification. The prescribed therapy achieved a high subjective patient satisfaction but an objective success could not be recognized.

[Staging of pain in patients with chronic low back pain in inpatient rehabilitation: validity of the Mainz Pain Staging System of pain chronification]. / Schmerzchronifizierung bei Rückenschmerzpatienten in der stationären Rehabilitation: Zur Validität des Mainzer Stadienmodells der Schmerzchronifizierung.

BACKGROUND: Criterion-related validity of the Mainz Pain Staging System (MPSS) was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effect of staging of pain on pain-related and psychosocial measures was investigated in a cross-sectional design among 478 patients with chronic low back pain in inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation (ICD-10 diagnoses: M45.4/M45.5, M54.4/M54.5). Pain-related measures were selected from the German Pain Questionnaire of the International Association for the Study of Pain (DGSS). The psychosocial measures depression (ADS), anxiety (HADS-D), somatization (SCL-90-R), quality of life (SF-12), functional capacity (FFbH-R), pain sensation (SES) as well as pain experience and strategies of coping with pain (FESV) were assessed. Furthermore, the frequency distribution of scores in the clinical range in pain-related and psychosocial measures depending on the staging of pain was examined. Finally, initial indications of the predictive validity of the MPSS were investigated among 116 inpatients. RESULTS: Staging of pain had a significant impact both on levels of measures and proportion of clinically referred patients. Patients in stage III, but also those in stage II showed significantly impaired levels. Patients in stage III also showed more scores in the clinical range than expected in the lowest pain intensity, ADS depression, somatization of the SCL, functional capacity, and pain sensation. The MPSS before rehabilitation, together with mental health, seem to be a good predictor of depressive symptoms 6 months after rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: The results support criterion validity of the MPSS, however, they also corroborate the concept that identification of medium and high grade pain by the MPSS has to be followed by a psychological diagnostic assessment. By this stepwise diagnostic process, therapy aims and treatment regimens can be designed more adequately.

Centralization: prevalence and effect on treatment outcomes using a standardized operational definition and measurement method.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort design. OBJECTIVES: Purpose 1 was to determine the association between age, symptom chronicity, and prevalence of centralization in a sample of patients with nonserious cervical or lumbar spinal syndromes referred to a hospital-based outpatient rehabilitation clinic. Purpose 2 was to examine if classifying these patients at intake to centralization or noncentralization predicts functional status, pain intensity, and number of treatment visits at discharge from rehabilitation. Purpose 3 was to compare clinically meaningful changes in functional status and pain intensity between patients subgrouped by centralization and noncentralization. BACKGROUND: Variations in operational definitions and measurements used to identify centralization affect patient classification, contribute to variation in reported prevalence rates, and influence treatment strategy and outcome interpretation. Investigating a standardized operational definition and measurement method for centralization may reduce practice and outcomes variation. METHODS AND MEASURES: Adults (n=418) with cervical or low back syndromes (mean +/- SD age, 58 +/- 17 years; range, 19-91 years; 33% male; 76% lumbar symptoms; 53% chronic symptoms) were assessed. Therapists classified patients using a standardized operational definition and method for centralization during initial evaluation. Prevalence rates were calculated for centralization by age and acuity. Multivariate models were used to assess discharge functional status, pain intensity, and visits while controlling important variables. Percentage of patients subgrouped by centralization and noncentralization achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in functional status and pain intensity was assessed. RESULTS: Overall prevalence rate for centralization was 17%, but increased for patients who were younger and reported acute symptoms regardless of body part. For patients with lumbar syndromes, noncentralization was associated with lower discharge functional status and more pain, but not associated with number of visits compared to patients classified as centralization. For patients with cervical syndromes, noncentralization was associated with more pain but not associated with functional status or number of visits compared to patients classified as centralization. Pain pattern classification affected percentage of patients with lumbar and cervical impairment achieving MCID. CONCLUSION: Results supported the clinical use of a standardized definition of centralization to facilitate patient classification and management and interpretation of outcomes.

McKenzie classification of mechanical spinal pain: profile of syndromes and directions of preference.

The purpose of this study was to develop a profile of the use of McKenzie classifications of diagnosis and treatment, by physiotherapists credentialed in the McKenzie method in New Zealand. This system has been in common use for more than 20 years and the inter-rater reliability of the assessment has been previously established for therapists at this level of training. Prior studies identifying the classification of patients according to syndrome and directional preference have been mainly for the lumbar spine. The 34 participants for this study each assessed and classified 10 consecutive spinal patients during a 10-week period. Of the 340 patients assessed, 19 were excluded. Of those with pain arising from the lumbar spine; 140/187 were classified as reducible derangement syndrome, 11/187 were classified as irreducible derangement, 11/187 as dysfunction syndrome, 1/187 as posture syndrome and 24/187 as 'other'. For treatment in the reducible derangement syndrome; 98/140 were given extension, 8/140 were given flexion and 34/140 were given lateral movements of either side gliding or rotation. Classifications and treatment for the cervical and thoracic spine groups followed similar patterns. These findings add to the external validity of the McKenzie method, and support mechanical evaluation of spinal patients according to directional preference.

Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective follow-up and retrospective review of 174 patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the type of leg pain syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis is correlated with outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although classifying patients based on their leg pain syndrome is useful in planning surgical decompression, there is no validated method of classification and its prognostic significance remains unknown. METHODS: Based on the type of leg pain, the patients were classified into 2 groups: unilateral and bilateral. Improvement in functional status was evaluated using the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale; the symptoms were rated on a visual analog scale and the change from baseline to 2-year evaluation was noted. Associations between score changes and baseline variables were examined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The type of leg pain was independently associated with improvements in function and leg symptom scores but was not associated with improvement in the back pain score. After surgery, patients with unilateral leg pain had significantly greater improvements in function and leg symptoms than patients with bilateral leg pain. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, the preoperative type of leg pain predicts function and leg symptom outcomes.

Classification by McKenzie mechanical syndromes: a survey of McKenzie-trained faculty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this survey was to identify the percentage of patients with spine pain who can be classified by McKenzie-trained faculty as having one of either derangement, dysfunction, or postural syndromes. METHODS: McKenzie Institute International faculty members in 20 countries, who are highly trained and are experienced users of the classification system, recorded details on 15 consecutively discharged patients. RESULTS: Responses were received from 57 therapists in 18 countries (89% of potential sample), and details were collected on 607 patients with spine pain. Eighty-three percent were classified in one of the mechanical syndromes; derangement was the most common syndrome. Therapists recorded a mechanical classification in a mean of 82% (SD, 15.1; range, 44%-100%) of their patients with spine pain. CONCLUSIONS: For this study, the McKenzie mechanical syndromes were commonly diagnosed in a large consecutive group of patients at multiple sites by experienced therapists. This classification system may have valuable clinical use in managing patients with spine pain.

Failed back surgery syndrome: diagnostic evaluation.

Failed back surgery syndrome is a common problem with enormous costs to patients, insurers, and society. The etiology of failed back surgery can be poor patient selection, incorrect diagnosis, suboptimal selection of surgery, poor technique, failure to achieve surgical goals, and/or recurrent pathology. Successful intervention in this difficult patient population requires a detailed history, precise physical examination, and carefully chosen diagnostic tests. The diagnostic evaluation should endeavor to accurately identify symptoms, rule out extraspinal causes, identify a specific spinal etiology, and assess the psychological state of the patient. Only after these factors have been assessed can further treatment be planned.