Intravenous doxapram administration as a potential model of panic attacks in rats.

Panic disorder can be categorized into the nonrespiratory or the respiratory subtypes, the latter comprising dyspnea, shortness of breath, chest pain, feelings of suffocation, and paresthesias. Doxapram is an analeptic capable of inducing panic attacks with respiratory symptoms in individuals diagnosed with the disorder; however, its neuroanatomical targets and its effects on experimental animals remain uncharacterized. One of the brain regions proposed to trigger panic attacks is the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG). Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the effects of doxapram in Fos (c-Fos) protein expression in the PAG and characterized its cardiorespiratory and behavioral effects on the elevated T maze and in the conditioned place aversion (CPA) paradigms. Doxapram increased Fos expression in different columns of the PAG, increased respiratory frequency, decreased heart rate, and increased arterial pressure when injected via intravenous route. Alprazolam, a panicolytic benzodiazepine, injected via intraperitoneal route, decreased respiratory frequency, whereas URB597, an anandamide hydrolysis inhibitor injected via intraperitoneal route, was ineffective. Doxapram injected via intraperitoneal route induced an anxiogenic-like effect in the elevated T-maze model; however, it failed to induce CPA. This study suggests that the cardiorespiratory and behavioral effects of doxapram in rodents serve as an experimental model that can provide insights into the neurobiology of panic attacks.

Doxapram alleviates low SpO2 induced by the combination of propofol and fentanyl during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Painless gastrointestinal endoscopy under intravenous propofol anesthesia is widely applied in the clinical scenario. Despite the good sedation and elimination of anxiety that propofol provides, low SpO2 may also result. Doxapram is a respiratory stimulant with a short half-life. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of doxapram on alleviating low SpO2 induced by the combination of propofol and fentanyl during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned to group D or S with 55 patients per group. Initially, both groups received a combination of propofol and fentanyl. Patients in group D received 50 mg doxapram after propofol injection, while patients in group S received an equal volume of saline. Vital signs of the patients, propofol dose, examination duration, and incidences of low SpO2 were recorded. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in propofol consumption and examination duration between the two groups. Twenty-six patients in group S experienced low SpO2 versus 10 in group D (P = 0.001). Nineteen patients in group S underwent oxygenation with a face mask in contrast to 8 in group D (P = 0.015). Eighteen patients in group S were treated with jaw lifting compared to 5 in group D (P = 0.002). Four patients in group S underwent assisted respiration compared to 2 in group D (without statistical difference). The average oxygen saturation in group S was significantly lower than that in group D at 1, 2 and 3 min after propofol injection (P < 0.001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.020, respectively). There were no statistical differences in oxygen saturation at other time points. There were no statistical differences in MAP and HR (except for the time point of 1 min after the induction) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose of doxapram can effectively alleviate low SpO2 in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy with intravenous propofol, without affecting propofol consumption, examination duration, MAP, or HR. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Clinical and New Technology of Wuxi People's Hospital on 20th July, 2018 (KYLLH2018029) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register on 16th August, 2018 (ChiCTR1800017832).

Comparison of the effects of alfaxalone and propofol with acepromazine, butorphanol and/or doxapram on laryngeal motion and quality of examination in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of alfaxalone and propofol, with and without acepromazine and butorphanol followed by doxapram, on laryngeal motion and quality of laryngeal examination in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, crossover, blinded study. ANIMALS: Ten female Beagle dogs, aged 11-13 months and weighing 7.2-8.6 kg. METHODS: The dogs were administered four intravenous (IV) treatments: alfaxalone (ALF), alfaxalone+acepromazine and butorphanol (ALF-AB), propofol (PRO) and propofol+AB (PRO-AB). AB doses were standardized. Dogs were anesthetized 5 minutes later by administration of alfaxalone or propofol IV to effect. Arytenoid motion during maximal inspiration and expiration was captured on video before and after IV doxapram (0.25 mg kg-1). The change in rima glottidis surface area (RGSA) was calculated to measure arytenoid motion. An investigator blinded to the treatment scored laryngeal examination quality. RESULTS: A 20% increase in RGSA was the minimal arytenoid motion that was detectable. RGSA was significantly less in ALF before doxapram compared with all other treatments. A <20% increase in RGSA was measured in eight of 10 dogs in PRO and in all dogs in ALF before doxapram. After doxapram, RGSA was significantly increased for PRO and ALF; however, 20% of dogs in PRO and 50% of dogs in ALF still had <20% increase in RGSA. A <20% increase in RGSA was measured in five of 10 dogs in PRO-AB and ALF-AB before doxapram. All dogs in PRO-AB and ALF-AB with <20% increase in RGSA before doxapram had ≥20% increase in RGSA after doxapram. Examination quality was significantly better in PRO-AB and ALF-AB. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of acepromazine and butorphanol improved the quality of laryngeal examination. Any negative impact on arytenoid motion caused by these premedications was overcome with doxapram. Using either propofol or alfaxalone alone is not recommended for the evaluation of arytenoid motion.

Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome after Doxapram for Apnea of Prematurity.

BACKGROUND: Doxapram has been advocated as a treatment for persistent apnea of prematurity (AOP). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of doxapram on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants as its safety still needs to be established. METHODS: From a retrospective cohort of preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) <30 weeks and/or a birth weight <1,250 g, born between 2000 and 2010, infants treated with doxapram (n = 142) and a nontreated control group were selected (n = 284). Patient characteristics and clinical and neurodevelopmental outcome data at 24 months' corrected age were collected. Neurodevelopmental delay (ND) was defined as having a Mental or Psychomotor Developmental Index (MDI/PDI) <-1 standard deviation (SD), cerebral palsy, or a hearing or visual impairment. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using multiple logistic regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Infants treated with doxapram had a lower GA compared to controls. The number of infants with a MDI or PDI <-1 SD was not different between the groups. The risk of the combined outcome death or ND was significantly lower in the doxapram group after adjusting for confounding factors (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.78). Doxapram-treated infants had a higher risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and patent ductus arteriosus, but a lower risk of spontaneous intestinal perforation. All other morbidities were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that doxapram is not associated with an increased risk of ND. These findings need to be confirmed or refuted by a large, well-designed, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2,000 patients.

PURPOSE: The study was designed to determine the incidence of postoperative agitation following general anesthesia in 2,000 adult patients and to examine the associated risk factors. METHODS: The study enrolled 2,000 adults who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia in a single institution during December 2007 to December 2008. The following risk factors were examined: age, gender, ASA physical status, type of surgery, anesthesia technique (inhalational or intravenous), administration of neostigmine or doxapram, adequate postoperative analgesia, pain, presence of a tracheal tube, and presence of a urinary catheter. RESULTS: Agitation occurred in 426 patients (21.3%). It was more common in males (28.1%) than in females (16.1%) (P = 0.017) and more prevalent after inhalational (27.8%) than total intravenous (7.5%) anesthesia (P = 0.001). Agitation was more common after oral cavity and otolaryngological surgery than after other types of surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that use of doxapram (odds ratio [OR] = 9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.2 - 15.4; P = 0.002) and pain (OR = 8.2; 95% CI = 4.5 - 16.9; P < 0.001) were the most important risk factors associated with emergence agitation. Other causes were the presence of a tracheal tube and/or a urinary catheter. Adequate postoperative analgesia was associated with less agitation (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.1 - 0.4; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Doxapram administration, pain, and presence of a tracheal tube and/or a urinary catheter appear to be the most important causes of postoperative agitation. To avoid this complication, it is suggested, whenever possible, to use intravenous anesthesia, to remove endotracheal tubes and urinary catheters as early as possible, and to provide adequate postoperative analgesia.

Comparative study on effectiveness of doxapram and pethidine for postanaesthetic shivering.

INTRODUCTION: Postanaesthetic shivering is a common condition after surgery which needs proper management with pharmacologic agents so as to make postoperative period comfortable to the patient and prevent from the untoward complications that can arise from it. This study was done to compare the effectiveness of Pethidine and Doxapram in the treatment of postanaesthetic shivering. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into three groups, ten in each. All received volume of 3 ml as Group I (Doxapram 1.5 mg/kg), Group II (Pethidine 0.35 mg/kg) and Group III (Normal Saline). All patients were observed for 30 minutes after reversal of muscle relaxant and occurrence of shivering within this period was observed, scored and treated. All treated patients were observed for 10 minutes after the test drug was given for control of shivering and any untoward effects. RESULTS: Pethidine was found more effective than Doxapram in treating postanaesthetic shivering as it was effective in 80% followed by Doxapram in 60% and Normal saline in 20%. Statistically the results between Normal saline and Pethidine was significant as P < 0.05. As statistical significance between Doxapram and Normal Saline was p = 0.16; and between Pethidine and Doxapram was p = 0.62, the difference is statistically not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Pethidine was found to be more effective compared to Doxapram in treating patients with postoperative shivering.

Difficult extubation in low birthweight infants.

Randomised trials have demonstrated that ventilation techniques which support every spontaneous breath are the most efficacious weaning modes. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation reduces the likelihood of incidents leading to the need for reintubation in very low birthweight infants; further work is needed to determine if there are advantages of particular delivery techniques. Both methylxanthines and dexamethasone facilitate weaning and extubation; the efficacy of low-dose dexamethasone merits further investigation. Assessments of the efficacy of respiratory efforts and hence the balance of respiratory drive, muscle performance and respiratory load appear to best predict weaning and extubation success. Essential to the success of weaning and extubation are dedicated staff, whether this will be assisted by computerised decision-making tools requires testing. The above approaches are not mutually exclusive and those indicated by this review as appropriately evidence based should be considered by practitioners for current use to reduce difficult/unsuccessful extubation.

The minimum effective doses of pethidine and doxapram in the treatment of post-anaesthetic shivering.

This study was designed to find the minimum effective doses of doxapram and pethidine to stop post-anaesthetic shivering. Two hundred and twenty healthy patients who shivered following routine surgery were allocated randomly to receive one of 10 doses of doxapram (0.18, 0.23, 0.29, 0.35, 0.41, 0.47, 0.7, 0.93, 1.17 and 1.4 mg.kg-1), one of five doses of pethidine (0.12, 0.18, 0.23, 0.29 and 0.35 mg.kg-1) or saline. Probit analysis demonstrated that the number of patients who stopped shivering with doxapram was independent of the amount of drug given in this dose range. The lowest dose of doxapram (0.18 mg.kg-1) was significantly more effective than placebo (p < 0.01). For pethidine there was a dose-dependent effect on shivering to a maximum of 95% of patients successfully treated with 0.35 mg.kg-1. We conclude that 0.35 mg.kg-1 of pethidine is the minimum dose required to treat post-anaesthetic shivering effectively. We also conclude that 0.18 mg.kg-1 of doxapram is as effective as 1.4 mg.kg-1 in the treatment of post-anaesthetic shivering. Further study is required to find the minimum effective dose of doxapram.

Doxapram improves pulmonary function after upper abdominal surgery.

The effects of doxapram on postoperative pulmonary function were studied in 40 ASA I and II patients randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1.8 mg.kg-1.h-1 or placebo for 2 h immediately after elective cholecystectomy. The two groups displayed similar reductions of carbon dioxide production at 2 h and 6 h postoperatively, whereas oxygen consumption remained at preoperative levels for 24 h. Minute ventilation was similarly reduced in the two groups at 2 h and 6 h postoperatively, with corresponding increases in PaCO2. PaO2 was similarly and significantly decreased in both groups postoperatively, whereas P(A-a)O2 remained unchanged at 2 h and 6 h in doxapram-treated patients. FRC was reduced postoperatively in both groups, significantly more so in the control group at 6 h. Various indices of intrapulmonary gas distribution, including the functional (nitrogen) dead space, underwent similar changes in the two groups. By contrast, the physiological dead space was reduced in doxapram-treated patients at 2 h, 6 h and 24 h postoperatively, whereas no significant changes were seen in the control group. The ventilatory equivalent for CO2 was significantly lower in the doxapram-treated group, implying higher ventilatory efficiency. Our findings indicate that infusion of doxapram postoperatively attenuates the impairment of pulmonary function postoperatively, chiefly via effects on V'A/Q' ratios. No side effects of doxapram were observed.

Restored hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by peripheral chemoreceptor agonists in dogs.

Hypoxic stimulation of the peripheral chemoreceptors inhibits hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). On the other hand, almitrine, a peripheral chemoreceptor agonist, has been reported in some studies to enhance HPV. To further explore this apparent contradiction, we investigated the effects of two different low intravenous doses of almitrine on pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) versus cardiac index (Q) plots in 32 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs ventilated alternatively in hyperoxia (FIO2, 0.4) and in hypoxia (FIO2 0.1). HPV, defined as a hypoxia-induced increase in Ppa over the entire range of Q studied, from 2 to 5 L/min/m2, was elicited in 16 dogs. In the first eight of these "responders," almitrine 2 micrograms/kg/min had no vascular effect, and in the other eight, almitrine 4 micrograms/kg/min inhibited HPV. In 16 other dogs, hypoxia did not affect Ppa over the entire range of Q. In these "nonresponders," almitrine 2 micrograms/kg/min (n = 8) as well as 4 micrograms/kg/min (n = 8) restored HPV. To answer the question whether the ability to restore HPV would be specific to almitrine, we administered intravenously the structurally unrelated chemoreceptor agonist doxapram at the dose of 20 micrograms/kg/min to an additional group of eight "nonresponders," and this treatment also restored HPV. Intravenous infusion of the malic acid solution solvent of almitrine had no effect on Ppa/Q plots in a final group of eight "nonresponders". We conclude that low dose almitrine and doxapram restore HPV in dogs with a naturally absent hypoxic pulmonary pressor response, probably by a direct effect at the pulmonary vessels.

Effect of doxapram on postoperative pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery in high-risk patients.

In a double-blind randomised trial an infusion of doxapram, 2 mg per min for 6 h immediately after surgery and repeated on the first postoperative day, or the same volume of saline, was given to 39 patients who underwent upper abdominal surgery and who were at high risk of postoperative day, or the same volume of saline, was given to 39 patients who underwent upper abdominal surgery and who were at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. The patients were assessed pre-operatively and during the first 5 postoperative days by physical examination, spirometry, blood-gas analysis, and chest radiography. Postoperative pulmonary complications were defined as temperature over 38 degrees C for 2 days, abnormal auscultation, pathological radiography, and/or productive cough. Data from 16 patients per group were analysed. Significantly more patients in the placebo group had three criteria of postoperative pulmonary complication compared with the doxapram group (63% vs 19%). The doxapram group also had higher PaO2 postoperatively.

I.V. doxapram hydrochloride and pulmonary complications after lower abdominal surgery.

An i.v. solution of 0.9% saline or 0.9% saline with doxapram 2 mg/ml was administered to 260 obstetric and gynaecological patients who breathed 35% oxygen following lower abdominal surgery. Arterial blood was sampled before and during the infusion in 104 subjects. With the administration of doxapram mean PaCO2 decreased, and arterial oxygenation improved. In both treatment groups respiratory complications occurred with the same low frequency (less than 15%). The majority of patients received antibiotics following surgery, but in 34 who did not, the incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly less following doxapram.