Amiodarone and Dronedarone Causes Liver Injury with Distinctly Different Clinical Presentations.

OBJECTIVE: To describe hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone from the DILIN and the US FDA's surveillance database. METHODS: Hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone enrolled in the U.S. Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) from 2004 to 2020 are described. Dronedarone hepatotoxicity cases associated with liver biopsy results were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2009 to 2020. RESULTS: Among DILIN's 10 amiodarone and 3 dronedarone DILIN cases, the latency for amiodarone was longer than with dronedarone (388 vs 119 days, p = 0.50) and the median ALT at DILI onset was significantly lower with amiodarone (118 vs 1191 U/L, p = 0.05). Liver biopsies in five amiodarone cases showed fibrosis, steatosis, and numerous Mallory-Denk bodies. Five patients died although only one from liver failure. One patient with dronedarone induced liver injury died of a non-liver related cause. Nine additional cases of DILI due to dronedarone requiring hospitalization were identified in the FAERS database. Three patients developed liver injury within a month of starting the medication. Two developed acute liver failure and underwent urgent liver transplant, one was evaluated for liver transplant but then recovered spontaneously, while one patient with cirrhosis died of liver related causes. CONCLUSION: Amiodarone hepatotoxicity resembles that seen in alcohol related liver injury, with fatty infiltration and inflammation. Dronedarone is less predictable, typically without fat and with a shorter latency of use before presentation. These differences may be explained, in part, by the differing pharmacokinetics of the two drugs leading to different mechanisms of hepatotoxicity.

Dronedarone Versus Sotalol in Antiarrhythmic Drug-Naive Veterans With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Sotalol and dronedarone are both used for maintenance of sinus rhythm for patients with atrial fibrillation. However, while sotalol requires initial monitoring for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia, dronedarone does not. These treatments can be used in comparable patients, but their safety and effectiveness have not been compared head to head. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety using data from a large health care system. METHODS: Using Veterans Health Administration data, we identified 11 296 antiarrhythmic drug-naive patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed dronedarone or sotalol in 2012 or later. We excluded patients with prior conduction disease, pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, ventricular arrhythmia, cancer, renal failure, liver disease, or heart failure. We used natural language processing to identify and compare baseline left ventricular ejection fraction between treatment arms. We used 1:1 propensity score matching, based on patient demographics, comorbidities, and medications, and Cox regression to compare strategies. To evaluate residual confounding, we performed falsification analysis with nonplausible outcomes. RESULTS: The matched cohort comprised 6212 patients (3106 dronedarone and 3106 sotalol; mean [±SD] age, 71±10 years; 2.5% female; mean [±SD] CHA2DS2-VASC, 2±1.3). The mean (±SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 55±11 and 58±10 for dronedarone and sotalol users, correspondingly. Dronedarone, compared with sotalol, did not demonstrate a significant association with risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.21]) or all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.68-1.16]). However, dronedarone was associated with significantly lower risk of ventricular proarrhythmic events (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38-0.74]) and symptomatic bradycardia (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.37-0.87]). The primary findings were stable across sensitivity analyses. Falsification analyses were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Dronedarone, compared with sotalol, was associated with a lower risk of ventricular proarrhythmic events and conduction disorders while having no difference in risk of incident cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality. These observational data provide the basis for prospective efficacy and safety trials.

Clove Oil Endorsed Transdermal Flux of Dronedarone Hydrochloride Loaded Bilosomal Nanogel: Factorial Design, In vitro Evaluation and Ex vivo Permeation.

The goal of this study was to develop a bilosomal gel formulation to enhance transdermal permeability of dronedarone hyrdrochloride (DRN) which suffers from poor oral absorption and limited bioavailability. To overcome this obstacle, bilosomes were successfully prepared using 23 full-factorial design. Span®40, cholesterol, sodium deoxycholate (bile salt), clove oil (permeability enhancer), and either Tween® 60 or Tween® 80 (edge activator) were used in bilosome preparation by ethanol injection method. In this design, independent variables were X1, edge activator type; X2, edge activator amount (mg); and X3, permeability enhancer concentration (% w/v). Optimal formula (B2) of the highest desirability of (0.776) demonstrated minimum vesicle size (VS) of 312.4 ± 24.42 nm, maximum absolute value of zeta potential (ZP) - 36.17 ± 2.57 mV, maximum entrapment efficiency (EE %) of 80.95 ± 3.01%, maximum deformability Index (DI) of 8.24 ± 1.26 g and maximum drug flux after 12 h (J12) of 21.23 ± 1.54 µg/cm2 h upon ex vivo permeation study. After 12 h, 70.29 ± 6.46% of DRN was released from B2. TEM identification of B2 showed spherical shaped nanosized vesicles which were physically stable for 3 months at different temperatures. B2 was incorporated into carboxymethylcellulose gel base for easiness of dermal application. B2 gel demonstrated good physical properties, non-Newtonian psuedoplastic flow, and enhanced release (57.0 ± 8.68% of DRN compared to only 13.3 ± 1.2% released from drug suspension after 12 h) and enhanced skin permeation.

Dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter across a range of renal function: a post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial.

AIMS: Use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging owing to issues with renal clearance, drug accumulation, and increased proarrhythmic risks. Because CKD is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), it is important to establish the efficacy and safety of AAD treatment in patients with CKD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dronedarone efficacy and safety in individuals with AF/AFL and varying renal functionality [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥60, ≥45 and <60, and <45 mL/min] was investigated in a post hoc analysis of ATHENA (NCT00174785), a randomized, double-blind trial of dronedarone vs. placebo in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF/AFL plus additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. Log-rank testing and Cox regression were used to compare the incidence of endpoints between treatments. Overall, 4588 participants were enrolled from the trial. There was no interaction between treatment group and baseline eGFR assessed as a continuous variable (P = 0.743) for the first CV hospitalization or death from any cause (primary outcome). This outcome was lower with dronedarone vs. placebo across a wide range of renal function. First CV hospitalization and first AF/AFL recurrence were both lower in the two least renally impaired subgroups with dronedarone vs. placebo. Treatment emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were more frequent with dronedarone vs. placebo and occurred more often in patients with severe renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Dronedarone is an effective AAD in patients with AF/AFL and CV risk factors across a wide range of renal function.

Treatment of Postoperative New Onset Atrial Fibrillation with Repolarization Delaying Agents after Heart Surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multichannel-blocker dronedarone for postoperative new onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) as compared to amiodarone. METHODS: Out of 990 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between March 2011 and March 2012, 166 patients who developed POAF and treated with amiodarone or dronedarone were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were treated with amiodarone and 77 patients were treated with dronedarone at discharge. Seventy-five percent of patients with dronedarone were treated initially with intravenous amiodarone but quickly converted to oral dronedarone as soon as the mechanical ventilation was weaned off. The rate of conversion in sinus rhythm was not influenced by the resulting amiodarone-to-dronedarone crossover as compared to oral dronedarone only (p <0.247 at the ICU and p <0.640 at the normal care unit). At hospital discharge sinus rhythm was documented in 44% of the amiodarone patients and 99% of the dronedarone patients (p <0.001). The maintenance of sinus rhythm was demonstrated in 82% of the amiodarone patients versus 81% of the dronedarone patients at 6-month follow-up (p <0.804). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated the higher conversion rate to sinus rhythm in the early phase in the dronedarone group despite a comparable conversion rate in the mid-term phase compared to amiodarone.

Amiodarone, Unlike Dronedarone, Activates Inflammasomes via Its Reactive Metabolites: Implications for Amiodarone Adverse Reactions.

Amiodarone is a benzofuran derivative used to treat arrhythmias, but its use is limited by adverse reactions. There is evidence that some of the severe adverse reactions such as liver injury and interstitial lung disease are immune-mediated; however, details of the mechanism have not been elucidated. We tested the ability of amiodarone to induce the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that activate inflammasomes. Human hepatocarcinoma functional liver cell-4 (FLC-4) cells were used for drug bioactivation, and the detection of inflammasome activation was performed with the human macrophage cell line, THP-1 cells. Amiodarone is known to be oxidized to reactive quinone metabolites. The supernatant from the incubation of amiodarone with FLC-4 cells for 7 days increased caspase-1 activity and production of IL-1ß by THP-1 cells. In the supernatant of FLC-4 cells with amiodarone, the heat shock protein (HSP) 40 was significantly increased. Addition of a cytochrome P450 inhibitor to the FLC-4 cells prevented the release of HSP40 from the FLC-4 cells and activation of THP-1 inflammasomes by the FLC-4 supernatant. These results suggested that the reactive quinone metabolites of amiodarone can cause the release of DAMPs from hepatocytes which can activate inflammasomes. Dronedarone, a safer analog of amiodarone, did not activate inflammasomes. Inflammasome activation may be an important step in the activation of the immune system by amiodarone, which in some patients, can cause immune-related adverse events. In addition, our data suggest that drugs that block the effects or the formation of IL-1ß would provide better treatment of amiodarone-induced immune-related adverse reactions.

Characterization of cytochrome P450s (CYP)-overexpressing HepG2 cells for assessing drug and chemical-induced liver toxicity.

Hepatic metabolism catalyzed by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily affects liver toxicity associated with exposures to natural compounds and xenobiotic agents. Previously we generated a battery of HepG2-derived stable cell lines that individually express 14 CYPs (1A1, 1A2, 1B1, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C18, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, 3A4, 3A5, and 3A7). In this study, we comprehensively characterized each cell line for its CYP expression and enzyme activity. Specifically, we measured the mRNA expression, protein expression, and metabolite formation. Using CYP3A4, 2D6, and 2C9-overexpressing cells as representatives, we examined the stability of these cells in long-term cultures for up to 10 passages. The results showed that CYPs can be stably overexpressed for up to 10 cell culture passages without losing their activities. The robustness of responses to stimuli among the cells at different passages was also investigated in CYP3A4-overexpressing cells and the response to amiodarone and dronedarone showed no difference between the cells at the passage 2 and 10. Moreover, the mRNA expression level of most CYPs was higher in CYP-overexpressing HepG2 cells than that in HepaRG cells and primary human hepatocytes. This study confirmed the stability of CYP-overexpressing HepG2 cell lines and provided useful information for a broader use of these cells in pharmacologic and toxicologic research.

Dronedarone blockage of the tumor-related Kv10.1 channel: a comparison with amiodarone.

Kv10.1 (Eag1, or KCNH1) is a human potassium-selective channel associated with tumor development. In this work, we study the interaction of the drug dronedarone with Kv10.1. Dronedarone presents two chemical modifications aimed to lessen side effects produced by its parent molecule, the antiarrhythmic amiodarone. Hence, our observations are discussed within the framework of a previously reported interaction of amiodarone with Kv10.1. Additionally, we show new data regarding the interaction of amiodarone with the channels. We found that, unexpectedly, the effect of dronedarone on Kv10.1 differs both quantitatively and qualitatively to that of amiodarone. Among other observations, we found that dronedarone seems to be an open-pore blocker, in contrast to the reported behavior of amiodarone, which seems to inhibit from both open and closed states. Additionally, herein we provide evidence showing that, in spite of their chemical similarity, these molecules inhibit the K+ conductance by binding to non-overlapping, independent (non-allosterically related) sites. Also, we show that, while amiodarone inhibits the Cole-Moore shift, dronedarone is unable to inhibit this voltage-dependent characteristic of Kv10.1.

Comparative evaluation of the hepatotoxicity, phototoxicity and photosensitizing potential of dronedarone hydrochloride and its cyclodextrin-based inclusion complexes.

In this study, the hepatotoxicity, phototoxicity and photosensitizing potential of free dronedarone (DRO) and its inclusion complexes with ß-cyclodextrin (ß-CD) and 2-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (HP-ß-CD), prepared by different methods, were investigated by using in vitro cell-based approaches. The results of the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity assay showed that free DRO and the CD-based inclusion complexes did not present any substantial phototoxic potential. The photosensitizing potential was assessed by using THP-1 cells and IL-8 as a biomarker, and the experimental data confirmed that both the free drug and the inclusion complexes are likely to cause skin photosensitization, as they were able to induce IL-8 release after irradiation. Nevertheless, the inclusion complexes obtained by kneading followed by spray-drying induced a lower IL-8 release and also presented a smaller stimulation index in comparison with free DRO, suggesting a reduction in the photosensitizing potential. Finally, the free drug and inclusion complexes were also tested for hepatotoxicity using HepG2 cells. Even though lower IC50 values were found for the inclusion complexes prepared by kneading followed by spray-drying, there was no significant difference, indicating that the complexation of dronedarone did not induce hepatotoxicity. Overall, the obtained data confirmed that the inclusion complexes prepared by kneading followed by spray-drying, especially those based on HP-ß-CD, appeared to be the most promising formulations and, therefore, could be encouragingly explored in the development of novel pharmaceutical dosage forms containing DRO, presumably with reduced side effects and improved safety profile.

Cardioprotective Effects of Dronedarone Mediated by the Influence on the Expression of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor.

PURPOSE: Dronedarone is a multichannel-blocking antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Observational data hypothesized a cardioprotective effect. In an in vitro endothelial cell-platelet model, we evaluated the molecular atheroprotective effects of dronedarone. METHODS: Following a 24-h incubation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with dronedarone (concentration 50, 100, and 150 ng/mL), they were then stimulated for 1 h with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and were subsequently incubated in direct contact with thrombin-activated platelets. After incubation, the expression of CD40L and CD62P on platelets, and the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) on endothelial cells were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Preincubation with 150 ng/mL of dronedarone reduced the expression of uPAR on endothelial cells after proinflammatory stimulation with LPS and also by direct endothelial contact with activated platelets (p = 0.0038). In contrast, the expression of CD40L and CD62P on platelets after proinflammatory stimulation with thrombin was significantly increased through direct preincubation with 50/100/150 ng/mL of dronedarone. However, dronedarone had no effects on the expression of MT1-MMP and ICAM-1 in HUVECs. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro analysis, dronedarone directly increased platelet activation but showed significant direct effects on endothelial cells and indirect effects on platelets on selected markers of atherosclerosis.

The Antiarrhythmic Drug, Dronedarone, Demonstrates Cytotoxic Effects in Breast Cancer Independent of Thyroid Hormone Receptor Alpha 1 (THRα1) Antagonism.

Previous research has suggested that thyroid hormone receptor alpha 1 (THRα1), a hormone responsive splice variant, may play a role in breast cancer progression. Whether THRα1 can be exploited for anti-cancer therapy is unknown. The antiproliferative and antitumor effects of dronedarone, an FDA-approved anti-arrhythmic drug which has been shown to antagonize THRα1, was evaluated in breast cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. The THRα1 splice variant and the entire receptor, THRα, were also independently targeted using siRNA to determine the effect of target knockdown in vitro. In our study, dronedarone demonstrates cytotoxic effects in vitro and in vivo in breast cancer cell lines at doses and concentrations that may be clinically relevant. However, knockdown of either THRα1 or THRα did not cause substantial anti-proliferative or cytotoxic effects in vitro, nor did it alter the sensitivity to dronedarone. Thus, we conclude that dronedarone's cytotoxic effect in breast cancer cell lines are independent of THRα or THRα1 antagonism. Further, the depletion of THRα or THRα1 does not affect cell viability or proliferation. Characterizing the mechanism of dronedarone's anti-tumor action may facilitate drug repurposing or the development of new anti-cancer agents.

Evaluating class III antiarrhythmic agents as novel MYC targeting drugs in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of amiodarone and its derivative dronedarone as novel drug repositioning candidates in EOC and to determine the potential pathways targeted by these drugs. METHODS: Drug-predict bioinformatics platform was used to assess the utility of amiodarone as a novel drug-repurposing candidate in EOC. EOC cells were treated with amiodarone and dronedarone. Cell death was assessed by Annexin V staining. Cell viability and cell survival were assessed by MTT and clonogenics assays respectively. c-MYC and mTOR/Akt axis were evaluated as potential targets. Effect on autophagy was determined by autophagy flux flow cytometry. RESULTS: "DrugPredict" bioinformatics platform ranked Class III antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone within the top 3.9% of potential EOC drug repositioning candidates which was comparable to carboplatin ranking in the top 3.7%. Amiodarone and dronedarone were the only Class III antiarrhythmic drugs that decreased the cellular survival of both cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant primary EOC cells. Interestingly, both drugs induced degradation of c-MYC protein and decreased the expression of known transcriptional targets of c-MYC. Furthermore, stable overexpression of non-degradable c-MYC partially rescued the effects of amiodarone and dronedarone induced cell death. Dronedarone induced higher autophagy flux in EOC cells as compared to amiodarone with decreased phospho-AKT and phospho-4EBP1 protein expression, suggesting autophagy induction due to inhibition of AKT/mTOR axis with these drugs. Lastly, both drugs also inhibited the survival of EOC tumor-initiating cells (TICs). CONCLUSIONS: We provide the first evidence of class III antiarrhythmic agents as novel c-MYC targeting drugs and autophagy inducers in EOC. Since c-MYC is amplified in >40% ovarian tumors, our results provide the basis for repositioning amiodarone and dronedarone as novel c-MYC targeting drugs in EOC with potential extension to other cancers.

Comparación de la eficacia y seguridad de flecainida y dronedarona como terapias antiarrítmicas para mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal en fibrilación auricular / Comparison of the efficacy and safety of dronedarone and flecainide as maintenance antiarrhythmic therapy for sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation

Resumen Introducción y objetivos: Dronedarona y flecainida son antiarrítmicos de primera elección para reducir recurrencias de fibrilación auricular (FA), sin existir estudios que los comparen entre sí. Nuestro objetivo es comparar la eficacia en cuanto a prevención de recurrencias y seguridad de ambos fármacos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron 123 pacientes de forma consecutiva en tratamiento con flecainida o dronedarona desde octubre de 2010 hasta febrero de 2013 por FA paroxística (76.4%) y FA persistente (23.6%). Se realizó cardioversión eléctrica en un 7.3% de los pacientes y farmacológica en un 16.3%. La mediana (rango intercuartílico) de seguimiento fue de 301 días (92-474), con una media de 2.8 revisiones por paciente. Se realizó análisis de tiempo hasta el primer evento mediante Kaplan-Meier y regresión de Cox ajustada por un índice de propensión. Resultados: De entre los 123 sujetos incluidos con FA, 71 fueron tratados con flecainida y 52 con dronedarona. Durante el seguimiento se registraron 36 recurrencias y 20 efectos adversos. Se documentaron un 36.6% de recurrencias en los pacientes tratados con flecainida en comparación con un 21% en los tratados con dronedarona (p = 0.073). En el análisis multivariante, dronedarona se mostró al menos tan eficaz como flecainida para prevenir recurrencias de FA (HR: 0.53, IC 95%: 0.20-1.44, p = 0.221) y demostró un perfil de seguridad comparable al de flecainida (HR: 0.68, IC 95%: 0.18-2.53, p = 0.566). Conclusiones: Según nuestra experiencia, dronedarona resulta al menos tan eficaz como flecainida para el mantenimiento de ritmo sinusal, con un buen perfil de tolerabilidad, a pesar de pautarse en pacientes con un perfil clínico más desfavorable.

Abstract Introduction and objectives: Dronedarone and flecainide are the first pharmacological choice to reduce recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there are no studies comparing them. A study was performed to compare the efficacy in terms of recurrence of AF and safety of both drugs. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included 123 consecutive patients treated with flecainide or dronedarone due to paroxysmal AF (76.4%) or persistent AF (23.6%), from October 2010 to February 2013. Electrical cardioversion was performed in 7.3% of patients and pharmacological cardioversion in 16.3%. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 301 days (92-474) with a mean of 2.8 reviews per patient. Time to first event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, adjusted for propensity score. Results: Of the 123 consecutive patients with AF included, 71 were on dronedarone and 52 on flecainide. During the follow-up, there were 36 AF recurrences and 20 safety events. There were recurrences in 36.6% of patients treated with flecainide, compared with 21% of those receiving dronedarone (P = .073). Dronedarone showed to be at least as effective as flecainide in preven- ting recurrence of atrial fibrillation (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.20-1.44, P = .221), and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile when compared with flecainide (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.18-2.53, P = .566). Conclusions: In our experience, dronedarone has been at least as effective and safe as flecainide, despite it was most frequently prescribed in patients with worse baseline risk profile.

The role of hepatic cytochrome P450s in the cytotoxicity of dronedarone.

Dronedarone is used to treat patients with cardiac arrhythmias and has been reported to be associated with liver injury. Our previous mechanistic work demonstrated that DNA damage-induced apoptosis contributes to the cytotoxicity of dronedarone. In this study, we examined further the underlying mechanisms and found that after a 24-h treatment of HepG2 cells, dronedarone caused cytotoxicity, G1-phase cell cycle arrest, suppression of topoisomerase II, and DNA damage in a concentration-dependent manner. We also investigated the role of cytochrome P450s (CYPs)-mediated metabolism in the dronedarone-induced toxicity using our previously established HepG2 cell lines expressing individually 14 human CYPs (1A1, 1A2, 1B1, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C18, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, 3A4, 3A5, and 3A7). We demonstrated that CYP3A4, 3A5, and 2D6 were the major enzymes that metabolize dronedarone, and that CYP3A7, 2E1, 2C19, 2C18, 1A1, and 2B6 also metabolize dronedarone, but to a lesser extent. Our data showed that the cytotoxicity of dronedarone was decreased in CYP3A4-, 3A5-, or 2D6-overexpressing cells compared to the control HepG2 cells, indicating that the parent dronedarone has higher potency than the metabolites to induce cytotoxicity in these cells. In contrast, cytotoxicity was increased in CYP1A1-overexpressing cells, demonstrating that CYP1A1 exerts an opposite effect in dronedarone's toxicity, comparing to CYP3A4, 3A5, or 2D6. We also studied the involvement of topoisomerase II in dronedarone-induced toxicity, and demonstrated that the overexpression of topoisomerase II caused an increase in cell viability and a decrease in γ-H2A.X induction, suggesting that suppression of topoisomerase II may be one of the mechanisms involved in dronedarone-induced liver toxicity.

Dronedarone-Induced Cardiac Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Its Mitigation by Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids.

Dronedarone and amiodarone are structurally similar antiarrhythmic drugs. Dronedarone worsens cardiac adverse effects with unknown causes while amiodarone has no cardiac adversity. Dronedarone induces preclinical mitochondrial toxicity in rat liver and exhibits clinical hepatotoxicity. Here, we further investigated the relative potential of the antiarrhythmic drugs in causing mitochondrial injury in cardiomyocytes. Differentiated rat H9c2 cardiomyocytes were treated with dronedarone, amiodarone, and their respective metabolites namely N-desbutyldronedarone (NDBD) and N-desethylamiodarone (NDEA). Intracellular ATP content, mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), and inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT1) activity and arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism were measured in H9c2 cells. Inhibition of electron transport chain (ETC) activities and uncoupling of ETC were further studied in isolated rat heart mitochondria. Dronedarone, amiodarone, NDBD and NDEA decreased intracellular ATP content significantly (IC50 = 0.49, 1.84, 1.07, and 0.63 µM, respectively) and dissipated Δψm potently (IC50 = 0.5, 2.94, 12.8, and 7.38 µM, respectively). Dronedarone, NDBD, and NDEA weakly inhibited CPT1 activity while amiodarone (IC50 > 100 µM) yielded negligible inhibition. Only dronedarone inhibited AA metabolism to its regioisomeric epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) consistently and potently. NADH-supplemented ETC activity was inhibited by dronedarone, amiodarone, NDBD and NDEA (IC50 = 3.07, 5.24, 11.94, and 16.16 µM, respectively). Cytotoxicity, ATP decrease and Δψm disruption were ameliorated via exogenous pre-treatment of H9c2 cells with 11, 12-EET and 14, 15-EET. Our study confirmed that dronedarone causes mitochondrial injury in cardiomyocytes by perturbing Δψm, inhibiting mitochondrial complex I, uncoupling ETC and dysregulating AA-EET metabolism. We postulate that cardiac mitochondrial injury is one potential contributing factor to dronedarone-induced cardiac failure exacerbation.

DNA damage-induced apoptosis and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway contribute to the toxicity of dronedarone in hepatic cells.

Dronedarone, an antiarrhythmic drug, has been marketed as an alternative to amiodarone. The use of dronedarone has been associated with severe liver injury; however, the mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, the possible mechanisms of dronedarone induced liver toxicity were characterized in HepG2 cells. Dronedarone decreased cells viability and induced apoptosis and DNA damage in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Pretreatment of the HepG2 cells with apoptosis inhibitors (caspase-3, -8, and -9) or the necrosis inhibitor (Necrox-5), partially, but significantly, reduced the release of lactate dehydrogenase. Dronedarone caused the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria to cytosol, a prominent feature of apoptosis. In addition, the activation of caspase-2 was involved in dronedarone induced DNA damage and the activation of JNK and p38 signaling pathways. Inhibition of JNK and p38 by specific inhibitors attenuated dronedarone-induced cell death, apoptosis, and DNA damage. Additionally, suppression of caspase-2 decreased the activities of JNK and p38. Dronedarone triggered DNA damage was regulated by downregulation of topoisomerase IIα at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Taken together, our data show that DNA damage, apoptosis, and the activation of JNK and p38 contribute to dronedarone-induced cytotoxicity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:278-289, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Class III antiarrhythmic drugs amiodarone and dronedarone impair KIR 2.1 backward trafficking.

Drug-induced ion channel trafficking disturbance can cause cardiac arrhythmias. The subcellular level at which drugs interfere in trafficking pathways is largely unknown. KIR 2.1 inward rectifier channels, largely responsible for the cardiac inward rectifier current (IK1 ), are degraded in lysosomes. Amiodarone and dronedarone are class III antiarrhythmics. Chronic use of amiodarone, and to a lesser extent dronedarone, causes serious adverse effects to several organs and tissue types, including the heart. Both drugs have been described to interfere in the late-endosome/lysosome system. Here we defined the potential interference in KIR 2.1 backward trafficking by amiodarone and dronedarone. Both drugs inhibited IK1 in isolated rabbit ventricular cardiomyocytes at supraclinical doses only. In HK-KWGF cells, both drugs dose- and time-dependently increased KIR 2.1 expression (2.0 ± 0.2-fold with amiodarone: 10 µM, 24 hrs; 2.3 ± 0.3-fold with dronedarone: 5 µM, 24 hrs) and late-endosomal/lysosomal KIR 2.1 accumulation. Increased KIR 2.1 expression level was also observed in the presence of Nav 1.5 co-expression. Augmented KIR 2.1 protein levels and intracellular accumulation were also observed in COS-7, END-2, MES-1 and EPI-7 cells. Both drugs had no effect on Kv 11.1 ion channel protein expression levels. Finally, amiodarone (73.3 ± 10.3% P < 0.05 at -120 mV, 5 µM) enhanced IKIR2.1 upon 24-hrs treatment, whereas dronedarone tended to increase IKIR2.1 and it did not reach significance (43.8 ± 5.5%, P = 0.26 at -120 mV; 2 µM). We conclude that chronic amiodarone, and potentially also dronedarone, treatment can result in enhanced IK1 by inhibiting KIR 2.1 degradation.

Thyroid hormone induce a p53-dependent DNA damage through PI3K/Akt activation in sperm.

Accumulating evidences showed that thyroid hormone was participated in the functioning of the reproductive system, and an elevated level of thyroid hormones had a negative impact on reproductive system. However, the molecular basis for this observation still remains to be fully understood. Here, we show that l-Thyroxine significantly impaired human sperm motility. The molecular basis showed that thyroxine receptor stimulation triggers Phosphatidyl Inositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling activation leading to the E3 ligase MDM2 phosphorylation at serine 166, which directly interacted with p53 for degradation. p53 degradation caused a p53-dependent DNA damage checkpoint or repair dysfunction, which eventually results in DNA damage accumulation in sperm. Our results highlight that inhibition of PI3K/Akt pathway or p53 degradation is important in maintaining sperm motility in a thyroxine receptor (TR)-dependent manner.

Identification of novel MRP3 inhibitors based on computational models and validation using an in vitro membrane vesicle assay.

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug resistance-associated protein 3 (MRP3), an efflux transporter on the hepatic basolateral membrane, may function as a compensatory mechanism to prevent the accumulation of anionic substrates (e.g., bile acids) in hepatocytes. Inhibition of MRP3 may disrupt bile acid homeostasis and is one hypothesized risk factor for the development of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Therefore, identifying potential MRP3 inhibitors could help mitigate the occurrence of DILI. METHODS: Bayesian models were developed using MRP3 transporter inhibition data for 86 structurally diverse drugs. The compounds were split into training and test sets of 57 and 29 compounds, respectively, and six models were generated based on distinct inhibition thresholds and molecular fingerprint methods. The six Bayesian models were validated against the test set and the model with the highest accuracy was utilized for a virtual screen of 1470 FDA-approved drugs from DrugBank. Compounds that were predicted to be inhibitors were selected for in vitro validation. The ability of these compounds to inhibit MRP3 transport at a concentration of 100µM was measured in membrane vesicles derived from stably transfected MRP3-over-expressing HEK-293 cells with [3H]-estradiol-17ß-d-glucuronide (E217G; 10µM; 5min uptake) as the probe substrate. RESULTS: A predictive Bayesian model was developed with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 71% against the test set used to evaluate the six models. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.710 against the test set. The final selected model was based on compounds that inhibited substrate transport by at least 50% compared to the negative control, and functional-class fingerprints (FCFP) with a circular diameter of six atoms, in addition to one-dimensional physicochemical properties. The in vitro screening of predicted inhibitors and non-inhibitors resulted in similar model performance with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 70%. The strongest inhibitors of MRP3-mediated E217G transport were fidaxomicin, suramin, and dronedarone. Kinetic assessment revealed that fidaxomicin was the most potent of these inhibitors (IC50=1.83±0.46µM). Suramin and dronedarone exhibited IC50 values of 3.33±0.41 and 47.44±4.41µM, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bayesian models are a useful screening approach to identify potential inhibitors of transport proteins. Novel MRP3 inhibitors were identified by virtual screening using the selected Bayesian model, and MRP3 inhibition was confirmed by an in vitro transporter inhibition assay. Information generated using this modeling approach may be valuable in predicting the potential for DILI and/or MRP3-mediated drug-drug interactions.