MEG detection of high frequency oscillations and intracranial-EEG validation in pediatric epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of automatically detecting high frequency oscillations (HFOs) in magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings in a group of ten paediatric epilepsy surgery patients who had undergone intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG). METHODS: A beamforming source-analysis method was used to construct virtual sensors and an automatic algorithm was applied to detect HFOs (80-250 Hz). We evaluated the concordance of MEG findings with the sources of iEEG HFOs, the clinically defined seizure onset zone (SOZ), the location of resected brain structures, and with post-operative outcome. RESULTS: In 8/9 patients there was good concordance between the sources of MEG HFOs and iEEG HFOs and the SOZ. Significantly more HFOs were detected in iEEG relative to MEG t(71) = 2.85, p < .05. There was good concordance between sources of MEG HFOs and the resected area in patients with good and poor outcome, however HFOs were also detected outside of the resected area in patients with poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of automatically detecting HFOs non-invasively in MEG recordings in paediatric patients, and confirm compatibility of results with invasive recordings. SIGNIFICANCE: This approach provides support for the non-invasive detection of HFOs to aid surgical planning and potentially reduce the need for invasive monitoring, which is pertinent to paediatric patients.

A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device.

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used over decades for pain management, but migration of percutaneous leads has been the most common complication. Better surgical techniques and newer SCS technologies likely reduced the incidence of lead migration requiring surgical revision, although data are sparse. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of clinically significant percutaneous lead migration in patients permanently implanted with a 10 kHz SCS system. Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic trunk and/or limb pain, permanently implanted between January 2016 and June 2019, were included in the analysis. Data were collected from the hospital's electronic medical records and the manufacturer's database. Clinically significant lead migration, defined as diminished pain relief followed by surgery to correct lead location, was assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, there were no cases of clinically significant lead migration, average pain relief was 65.2%, 82% of patients had response (≥50% pain relief), improvement of function was noted in 72% of patients, and decrease of medication was observed in 42% of patients. Therapy efficacy was sustained in patients with >12 months follow-up; the average pain relief was 58.5%, and the response rate was 82%. Conclusions: The surgical techniques in use today are designed to minimise the risk of percutaneous lead migration and may have reduced its incidence. In addition, new SCS systems may give greater opportunity to mitigate cases of minor lead movement using alternative stimulation programs.

Navigated Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Evaluating the Combined Use of a Frame-Based Stereotactic System and a Navigation System.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a complex surgical procedure that requires detailed anatomical knowledge. In many fields of neurosurgery navigation systems are used to display anatomical structures during an operation to aid performing these surgeries. In frame-based DBS, the advantage of visualization has not yet been evaluated during the procedure itself. In this study, we added live visualization to a frame-based DBS system, using a standard navigation system and investigated its accuracy and potential use in DBS surgery. As a first step, a phantom study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of the navigation system in conjunction with a frame-based approach. As a second step, 5 DBS surgeries were performed with this combined approach. Afterwards, 3 neurosurgeons and 2 neurologists with different levels of experience evaluated the potential use of the system with a questionnaire. Moreover, the additional personnel, costs and required set up time were noted and compared to 5 consecutive standard procedures. In the phantom study, the navigation system showed an inaccuracy of 2.1 mm (mean SD 0.69 mm). In the questionnaire, a mean of 9.4/10 points was awarded for the use of the combined approach as a teaching tool, a mean of 8.4/10 for its advantage in creating a 3-dimensional (3-D) map and a mean of 8/10 points for facilitating group discussions. Especially neurosurgeons and neurologists in training found it useful to better interpret clinical results and side effects (mean 9/10 points) and neurosurgeons appreciated its use to better interpret microelectrode recordings (mean 9/10 points). A mean of 6/10 points was awarded when asked if the benefits were worth the additional efforts. Initially 2 persons, then one additional person was required to set up the system with no relevant added time or costs. Using a navigation system for live visualization during frame-based DBS surgery can improve the understanding of the complex 3-D anatomy and many aspects of the procedure itself. For now, we would regard it as an excellent teaching tool rather than a necessity to perform DBS surgeries.

Do directional deep brain stimulation leads rotate after implantation?

BACKGROUND: The two middle contacts of directional leads (d-leads) for deep brain stimulation are split into three segments, allowing current steering toward desired axial directions. To facilitate programming, their final orientation needs to be reliably determined. However, it is currently unclear whether d-leads rotate after implantation. Our objective was to assess the degree of d-lead rotation after implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed d-lead orientation on intraoperative X-rays, postoperative CT scans (latencies to surgery: 108-189 min postoperatively), and rotational fluoroscopies (4-9 days postoperatively) for a consecutive series of 32 implanted d-leads. For five d-leads, a CT scan with a mean follow-up of 57 days (range 28-182) was available. All d-leads were implanted with the marker facing anterior and the intention to hit an "iron sight" (ISi) on the X-ray, indicating anterior orientation (i.e., 0° ± 6°). RESULTS: In nine d-leads, an ISi was visible on the final X-ray; median orientation was 1.5° (range 0.5-6.0°) at the first follow-up CT, confirming anterior orientation. In d-leads without ISi or where ISi was not evaluable, the median rotation was 15.5° (9.5-35.0°) and 26.5° (5.5-62.0°), respectively. The orientation of the initial CT was comparable with the orientation determined by the postoperative rotational fluoroscopy and second CT in all d-lead groups. CONCLUSION: D-lead orientation does not change within the first week after implantation. We provide first indications that d-lead orientation remains stable for several weeks after surgery. Determination of lead orientation using marker-based X-ray alone seems too imprecise; adding the ISi method can increase determination of intraoperative orientation.

Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Implantation Using a Customized Rapidly Manufactured Stereotactic Fixture with Submillimetric Euclidean Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The microTargetingTM MicrotableTM Platform is a novel stereotactic system that can be more rapidly fabricated than currently available 3D-printed alternatives. We present the first case series of patients who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery guided by this platform and demonstrate its in vivo accuracy. METHODS: Ten patients underwent DBS at a single institution by the senior author and 15 leads were placed. The mean age was 69.1 years; four were female. The ventralis intermedius nucleus was targeted for patients with essential tremor and the subthalamic nucleus was targeted for patients with Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: Nine DBS leads in 6 patients were appropriately imaged to enable measurement of accuracy. The mean Euclidean electrode placement error (EPE) was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm, and the mean radial error was 0.80 ± 0.41 mm (n = 9). In the subset of CT scans performed greater than 1 month postoperatively (n = 3), the mean Euclidean EPE was 0.75 ± 0.17 mm and the mean radial error was 0.69 ± 0.17 mm. There were no surgical complications. CONCLUSION: The MicrotableTM platform is capable of submillimetric accuracy in patients undergoing stereotactic surgery. It has achieved clinical efficacy in our patients without surgical complications and has demonstrated the potential for superior accuracy compared to both traditional stereotactic frames and other common frameless systems.

Effect of Anesthesia on Microelectrode Recordings during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery in Tourette Syndrome Patients.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an accepted treatment for patients with medication-resistant Tourette syndrome (TS). Sedation is commonly required during electrode implantation to attenuate anxiety, pain, and severe tics. Anesthetic agents potentially impair the quality of microelectrode recordings (MER). Little is known about the effect of these anesthetics on MER in patients with TS. We describe our experience with different sedative regimens on MER and tic severity in patients with TS. METHODS: The clinical records of all TS patients who underwent DBS surgery between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. Demographic data, stimulation targets, anesthetic agents, perioperative complications, and MER from each hemisphere were collected and analyzed. Single-unit activity was identified by filtering spiking activity from broadband MER data and principal component analysis with K-means clustering. Vocal and motor tics which caused artifacts in the MER data were manually selected using visual and auditory inspection. RESULTS: Six patients underwent bilateral DBS electrode implantation. In all patients, the target was the anterior internal globus pallidus. Patient comfort and hemodynamic and respiratory stability were maintained with conscious sedation with one or more of the following anesthetic drugs: propofol, midazolam, remifentanil, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine. Good quality MER and clinical testing were obtained in 9 hemispheres of 6 patients. In 3 patients, MER quality was poor on one side. CONCLUSION: Cautiously applied sedative drugs can provide patient comfort, hemodynamic and respiratory stability, and suppress severe tics, with minimal interference with MER.

Comparison of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials Monitoring with Direct Cranial Stimulation by Peg-Screw and Transcranial Stimulation by Corkscrew for Supratentorial Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Corkscrew (CS) electrodes are usually used for transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in the intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP). Direct cranial stimulation with peg-screw (PS) electrodes can elicit MEP. The present study investigated the difference in the initial threshold between PS and CS electrodes for intraoperative MEP monitoring. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed TES-MEP monitoring for supratentorial surgery in 72 patients. Of these 72 patients, 44 were monitored with PS and CS electrodes (PS/CS group) and 28 were monitored with CS and CS electrodes (CS/CS group). TES was used to deliver electrical stimulation by a train of 4-pulse anodal constant current stimulation. The initial threshold in each electrode was checked and analyzed. RESULTS: In the PS/CS group, the initial threshold with the PS electrode was 38.3 ± 15.1 mA (mean ± standard deviation) on the affected side, and the initial threshold with the CS electrode was 51.4 ± 13.9 mA on the unaffected side. The initial threshold with the PS electrode was significantly lower than that with the CS electrode (P = 0.0001). In the CS/CS group, the initial threshold was 56.2 ± 16.5 mA on the affected side and 62.1 ± 18.6 mA on the unaffected side, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: The initial threshold to elicit MEP was significantly lower with the PS electrode than with the CS electrode. A PS electrode can be used as a feasible stimulation electrode for TES-MEP.

The Accuracy and Feasibility of Robotic Assisted Lead Implantation in Nonhuman Primates.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation are the most important and frequent manipulations in nonhuman primates (NHP) neuromodulation research. However, traditional methods tend to be arduous and inaccurate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve adult male rhesus monkeys were selected for the study, with six subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, six anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) DBS and six hippocampus-SEEG (Hippo-SEEG) electrodes implantation. Mean Euclidean errors of entrance and the target were calculated by postoperative image fusion, and the correlation between entrance and target error, as well as the differences among the various manipulations, were analyzed. The accuracy of target was further confirmed by gross anatomy examination. Moreover, the time consumption was recorded. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) Euclidean errors of the target point and entry point of the three manipulations were STN-DBS: 1.05 ± 0.54 mm and 0.52 ± 0.17 mm; ANT-DBS: 1.12 ± 0.74 mm and 0.58 ± 0.24 mm; and Hippo-SEEG: 2.68 ± 1.03 mm and 1.47 ± 0.63 mm. Significant differences were observed in both target and entry point errors between the DBS and Hippo-SEEG groups, with superior accuracy in the DBS group. The entrance errors had a significantly positive correlation with the target errors in the STN-DBS and Hippo-SEEG groups. Moreover, the time consumption in robotic surgery was much shorter than that in the traditional method, without any severe complications. CONCLUSION: The application of robot-assisted lead implantation in NHP neuromodulation research is feasible, accurate, safe, and efficient, and can prospectively be beneficial to neurological studies.

Accuracy in Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Analysis of Sterotactic Error in Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Surgical Cases.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons utilize assistants to perform procedures in more than one operating room at a given time using a practice known as overlapping surgery. Debate has continued as to whether overlapping surgery improves the efficiency and access to care or risks patient safety and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of overlapping surgery in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of overlapping and non-overlapping cases, we evaluated stereotactic accuracy, operative duration, length of hospital stay, and the presence of hemorrhage, wound-related complications, and hardware-related complications requiring revision in adults with movement disorders undergoing DBS. RESULTS: Of 324 cases, 141 (43.5%) were overlapping and 183 (56.5%) non-overlapping. Stereotactic error, number of brain penetrations, and postoperative length of hospitalization did not differ significantly (p ≥ 0.08) between the overlapping and non-overlapping groups. Mean operative duration was significantly longer for overlapping (81/141 [57.4%], 189.5 ± 10.8 min) than for non-overlapping cases (79/183 [43.2%], 169.9 ± 7.6 min; p = 0.004). There were no differences in rates of wound-related complications or hemorrhages, but overlapping cases had a significantly higher rate of hardware-related complications requiring revision (7/141 [5.0%] vs. 0/183 [0%]; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping and non-overlapping cases had comparable DBS lead placement accuracy. Overlapping cases had a longer operative duration and had a higher rate of hardware-related complications requiring revision.

Electromagnetic Interference with Protocolized Electrosurgery Dispersive Electrode Positioning in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: Electromagnetic interference from monopolar electrosurgery may disrupt implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Current management recommendations by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and Heart Rhythm Society are based on expert clinical opinion since there is a paucity of data regarding the risk of electromagnetic interference to implantable cardioverter defibrillators during surgery. WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: With protocolized electrosurgery dispersive electrode positioning in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, the risk of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference was 7% in above-the-umbilicus noncardiac surgery and 0% in below-the-umbilicus surgery. In cardiac surgery, clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with use of an underbody dispersive electrode was 29%.Despite protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risk of electromagnetic interference in above-the-umbilicus surgery is high, supporting recommendations to suspend antitachycardia therapy when monopolar electrosurgery is used above the umbilicus.With protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risk of electromagnetic interference in below-the-umbilicus surgery is negligible, implying that suspending antitachycardia therapy might be unnecessary in these cases.With an underbody dispersive electrode, the risk of electromagnetic interference in cardiac surgery is high. BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the occurrence of intraoperative electromagnetic interference from monopolar electrosurgery in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing surgery. A protocolized approach was used to position the dispersive electrode. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study including 144 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators undergoing surgery between May 2012 and September 2016 at an academic medical center. The primary objectives were to determine the occurrences of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference (interference that would have resulted in delivery of inappropriate antitachycardia therapy had the antitachycardia therapy not been programmed off) in noncardiac surgeries above the umbilicus, noncardiac surgeries at or below the umbilicus, and cardiac surgeries with the use of an underbody dispersive electrode. RESULTS: The risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference were 14 of 70 (20%) and 5 of 70 (7%) in above-the-umbilicus surgery, 1 of 40 (2.5%) and 0 of 40 (0%) in below-the-umbilicus surgery, and 23 of 34 (68%) and 10 of 34 (29%) in cardiac surgery. Had conservative programming strategies intended to reduce the risk of inappropriate antitachycardia therapy been employed, the occurrence of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference would have been 2 of 70 (2.9%) in above-the-umbilicus surgery and 3 of 34 (8.8%) in cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with surgery above the umbilicus were high, supporting published recommendations to suspend antitachycardia therapy whenever monopolar electrosurgery is used above the umbilicus. For surgery below the umbilicus, these risks were negligible, implying that suspending antitachycardia therapy is likely unnecessary in these patients. For cardiac surgery, the risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with an underbody dispersive electrode were high. Conservative programming strategies would not have eliminated the risk of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference in either noncardiac surgery above the umbilicus or cardiac surgery.

Frameless Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Single-Center Experience and Retrospective Analysis of Placement Accuracy of 220 Electrodes in a Series of 110 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Proper lead placement is considered one of the key factors in achieving a good clinical outcome in deep brain stimulation (DBS), but there is still considerable controversy surrounding the accuracy of the frameless in comparison to the frame-based technique. OBJECTIVE: We report our single-center experience with DBS electrode placement to evaluate the accuracy of the frameless stereotactic system. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the data of 110 patients who underwent DBS surgery for Parkinson disease, dystonia, essential tremor, or refractory epilepsy. The final targets (FTs) of the 220 leads were: subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus pars interna, ventralis intermedius nucleus, and anterior nuclei of thalamus in thalamus. A bilateral stereotactic approach using a combined identification of target based on preoperative images (MRI and CT scan fusion) and intra-operative micro-electrode recording (MER) were done. We collected and compared the coordinates of planned target (PT), the definitive expected target (ET) during MER, and the effective final location (FT) of the lead using the postoperative CT. Accuracy was assessed by both vector error (VE) and deviation from the PT. RESULTS: The mean and SD from PTs was 0.78 ± 0.43 mm in the x direction, 0.68 ± 0.41 mm in the y direction, and 0.76 ± 0.41 mm in the z direction. Global VE was 1.43 ± 0.37. CONCLUSION: Frameless systems appear to be a reliable and accurate technique.

Electrode placement accuracy in robot-assisted epilepsy surgery: A comparison of different referencing techniques including frame-based CT versus facial laser scan based on CT or MRI.

BACKGROUND: Precise robotic or stereotactic implantation of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) electrodes relies on the exact referencing of the planning images in order to match the patient's anatomy to the stereotactic device or robot. We compared the accuracy of sEEG electrode implantation with stereotactic frame versus laser scanning of the face based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for referencing. METHODS: The accuracy was determined by calculating the Euclidian distance between the planned trajectory and the postoperative position of the sEEG electrode, defining the entry point error (EPE) and the target point error (TPE). The sEEG electrodes (n = 171) were implanted with the robotic surgery assistant (ROSA) in 19 patients. Preoperative trajectory planning was performed on three-dimensional (3D) MRI datasets. Referencing was accomplished either by performing (A) 1.25-mm slice CT with the patient's head fixed in a Leksell stereotactic frame (CT-frame, n = 49), fused with a 3D-T1-weighted, contrast enhanced- and T2-weighted 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI; (B) 1.25 mm CT (CT-laser, n = 60), fused with 3D-3.0-T MRI; (C) 3.0-T MRI T1-based laser scan (3.0-T MRI-laser, n = 56) or (D) in one single patient, because of a pacemaker, 3D-1.5-T MRI T1-based laser scan (1.5-T MRI-laser, n = 6). RESULTS: In (A) CT-frame referencing, the mean EPE amounted to 0.86 mm and the mean TPE amounted to 2.28 mm (n = 49). In (B) CT-laser referencing, the EPE amounted to 1.85 mm and the TPE to 2.41 mm (n = 60). In (C) 3.0-T MRI-laser referencing, the mean EPE amounted to 3.02 mm and the mean TPE to 3.51 mm (n = 56). In (D) 1.5-T MRI, surprisingly the mean EPE amounted only to 0.97 mm and the TPE to 1.71 mm (n = 6). In 3 cases using CT-laser and 1 case using 3.0 T MRI-laser for referencing, small asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages were detected. No further complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Robot-guided sEEG electrode implantation using CT-frame referencing and CT-laser-based referencing is most accurate and can serve for high precision placement of electrodes. In contrast, 3.0-T MRI-laser-based referencing is less accurate, but saves radiation. Most trajectories can be reached if alternative routes over less vascularized brain areas are used. This article is part of the Special Issue "Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond".

Fixed-Life or Rechargeable Battery for Deep Brain Stimulation: Which Do Patients Prefer?

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used to treat a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Implantable pulse generators (implantable pulse generators/batteries) for DBS were originally only available as a nonrechargeable option. However, there is now a choice between fixed-life and rechargeable batteries, with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. The extent of patient involvement in the choice of battery and the factors that matter to them have not been well studied. METHODS: Thirty consecutive adult patients with movement disorders attending a pre-DBS clinic were offered a choice of fixed-life or rechargeable battery and completed a questionnaire after the consultation on which factors influenced their decision. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (63%) chose the fixed-life battery and 11 patients (37%) chose the rechargeable battery. There were no significant differences in age, sex, underlying disease, disease duration or Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (part 3) score (for patients with Parkinson disease) between those who chose the fixed-life vs. rechargeable battery. Most patients were not concerned about the size of the battery. Equal numbers were concerned about surgery to replace the battery, and less than half were concerned about the need to recharge the battery. More than half of patients felt that an acceptable charging frequency was monthly or yearly, and all patients felt that an acceptable charging duration was less than 1 hour, with half of all patients choosing less than 30 min. The main reasons cited for choosing the fixed-life battery were convenience and concern about forgetting to recharge the battery. The main reason for choosing the rechargeable battery was the avoidance of further surgery. DISCUSSION: Most patients in this adult cohort with movement disorders chose the fixed-life battery. The better lifestyle associated with a fixed-life battery is a major factor influencing their choice. Rechargeable batteries may be more acceptable if the recharging process is improved, more convenient, and discreet. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors' institution has received educational grants from Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies.

Invasive EEG-electrodes in presurgical evaluation of epilepsies: Systematic analysis of implantation-, video-EEG-monitoring- and explantation-related complications, and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is a diagnostic procedure for patients with refractory focal epilepsies that is performed to localize and define the epileptogenic zone. In contrast to grid electrodes, sEEG electrodes are implanted using minimal invasive operation techniques without large craniotomies. Previous studies provided good evidence that sEEG implantation is a safe and effective procedure; however, complications in asymptomatic patients after explantation may be underreported. The aim of this analysis was to systematically analyze clinical and imaging data following implantation and explantation. RESULTS: We analyzed 18 consecutive patients (mean age: 30.5 years, range: 12-46; 61% female) undergoing invasive presurgical video-EEG monitoring via sEEG electrodes (n = 167 implanted electrodes) over a period of 2.5 years with robot-assisted implantation. There were no neurological deficits reported after implantation or explantation in any of the enrolled patients. Postimplantation imaging showed a minimal subclinical subarachnoid hemorrhage in one patient and further workup revealed a previously unknown factor VII deficiency. No injuries or status epilepticus occurred during video-EEG monitoring. In one patient, a seizure-related asymptomatic cross break of two fixation screws was found and led to revision surgery. Unspecific symptoms like headaches or low-grade fever were present in 10 of 18 (56%) patients during the first days of video-EEG monitoring and were transient. Postexplantation imaging showed asymptomatic and small bleedings close to four electrodes (2.8%). CONCLUSION: Overall, sEEG is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Systematic imaging after implantation and explantation helps to identify clinically silent complications of sEEG. In the literature, complication rates of up to 4.4% in sEEG and in 49.9% of subdural EEG are reported; however, systematic imaging after explantation was not performed throughout the studies, which may have led to underreporting of associated complications.

Frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography for refractory epilepsy in pediatric patients: accuracy, usefulness, and technical issues.

BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an effective technique to help to locate and to delimit the epileptogenic area and/or to define relationships with functional cortical areas. We intend to describe the surgical technique and verify the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of robot-assisted SEEG in a newly created SEEG program in a pediatric center. We focus on the technical difficulties encountered at the early stages of this program. METHODS: We prospectively collected SEEG indication, intraoperative events, accuracy calculated by fusion of postoperative CT with preoperative planning, complications, and usefulness of SEEG in terms of answering preimplantation hypothesis. RESULTS: Fourteen patients between the ages of 5 and 18 years old (mean 10 years) with drug-resistant epilepsy were operated on between April 2016 and April 2018. One hundred sixty-four electrodes were implanted in total. The median entry point localization error (EPLE) was 1.57 mm (1-2.25 mm) and the median target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.77 mm (1.2-2.6 mm). We recorded seven intraoperative technical issues. Two patients suffered complications: meningitis without demonstrated germ in one patient and a right frontal hematoma in the other. In all cases, the SEEG was useful for the therapeutic decision-making. CONCLUSION: SEEG has been useful for decision-making in all our pediatric patients. The robotic arm is an accurate tool for the insertion of the deep electrodes. Nevertheless, it is an invasive technique not risk-free and many problems can appear at the beginning of a robotic arm-assisted SEEG program that must be taken into account beforehand.

French guidelines on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was designed and developed in the 1960s in France by J. Talairach and J. Bancaud. It is an invasive method of exploration for drug-resistant focal epilepsies, offering the advantage of a tridimensional and temporally precise study of the epileptic discharge. It allows anatomo-electrical correlations and tailored surgeries. Whereas this method has been used for decades by experts in a limited number of European centers, the last ten years have seen increasing worldwide spread of its use. Moreover in current practice, SEEG is not only a diagnostic tool but also offers a therapeutic option, i.e., thermocoagulation. In order to propose formal guidelines for best clinical practice in SEEG, a working party was formed, composed of experts from every French centre with a large SEEG experience (those performing more than 10 SEEG per year over at least a 5 year period). This group formulated recommendations, which were graded by all participants according to established methodology. The first part of this article summarizes these within the following topics: indications and limits of SEEG; planning and management of SEEG; surgical technique; electrophysiological technical procedures; interpretation of SEEG recordings; and SEEG-guided radio frequency thermocoagulation. In the second part, those different aspects are discussed in more detail by subgroups of experts, based on existing literature and their own experience. The aim of this work is to present a consensual French approach to SEEG, which could be used as a basic document for centers using this method, particularly those who are beginning SEEG practice. These guidelines are supported by the French Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the French chapter of the International League Against Epilepsy.

Evaluation of high-density, multi-contact nerve cuffs for activation of grasp muscles in monkeys.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to evaluate whether nerve cuffs can selectively activate hand muscles for functional electrical stimulation (FES). FES typically involves identifying and implanting electrodes in many individual muscles, but nerve cuffs only require implantation at a single site around the nerve. This method is surgically more attractive. Nerve cuffs may also more effectively stimulate intrinsic hand muscles, which are difficult to implant and stimulate without spillover to adjacent muscles. APPROACH: To evaluate its ability to selectively activate muscles, we implanted and tested the flat interface nerve electrode (FINE), which is designed to selectively stimulate peripheral nerves that innervate multiple muscles (Tyler and Durand 2002 IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 10 294-303). We implanted FINEs on the nerves and bipolar intramuscular wires for recording compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) from up to 20 muscles in each arm of six monkeys. We then collected recruitment curves while the animals were anesthetized. MAIN RESULT: A single FINE implanted on an upper extremity nerve in the monkey can selectively activate muscles or small groups of muscles to produce multiple, independent hand functions. SIGNIFICANCE: FINE cuffs can serve as a viable supplement to intramuscular electrodes in FES systems, where they can better activate intrinsic and extrinsic muscles with lower currents and less extensive surgery.

A Comparison of Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), Simultaneous Bilateral DBS, and Staged Bilateral DBS Lead Accuracies.

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of lead placement within the brain can affect the outcome of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Whether performing unilateral lead implantation, simultaneous bilateral lead implantation, or staged bilateral lead implantation affects accuracy has not yet been assessed. We compare lead placement errors to evaluate whether one approach affords greater lead accuracy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 205 leads placed in 125 DBS surgeries. The accuracy of lead placement, defined by differences in x, y, and z coordinates and error vector magnitudes, was compared between three surgery groups: unilateral leads, bilateral leads placed simultaneously, and bilateral leads placed in staged surgeries. We also compared accuracies between first and second leads within each bilateral cohort and between second leads of the bilateral cohorts. Finally, we examined the effect of target and age on accuracy. RESULTS: The accuracy of lead placement was comparable among unilateral, simultaneous bilateral, and staged bilateral leads. Timing of placement of the second lead in bilateral cases was not found to affect accuracy. The mean number of microelectrode trajectories was greater for first leads in simultaneous bilateral DBS (p = 0.032). No significant correlation between either age or target and accuracy was found. CONCLUSION: Although there may be other important reasons for performing DBS in a staged fashion, our study finds that neither laterality nor timing of second lead placement, patient age, or target site have significant impact on DBS lead accuracy, a finding that indicates with appropriate approach selection based on patient factors, accuracy does not have to be significantly compromised.

Evaluation of the PhysioTel™ Digital M11 cardiovascular telemetry implant in socially housed cynomolgus monkeys up to 16weeks after surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The novel PhysioTel™ Digital M11 telemetry implant was evaluated in socially housed monkeys with respect to both safety pharmacological cardiovascular (arterial blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and electrocardiogram (ECG)) and toxicological (clinical pathology and histopathology) endpoints. METHODS: Telemetry and clinical pathology data were obtained repeatedly up to 16weeks after surgery in four female cynomolgus monkeys, followed by necropsy. Due to postsurgical complications, one spare animal was included and only toxicological endpoints from the affected (fifth animal) were reported. Continuous telemetry recordings were conducted at periods without dosing and after ascending doses of moxifloxacin (0, 10, 30, 100mg/kg) and L-NAME (0, 0.1, 1, 10mg/kg). Additionally, a retrospective power analysis was conducted based on baseline M11 implant data from 32 other animals. RESULTS: During periods without dosing, the cardiovascular endpoints were stable over time and within normal ranges. Moxifloxacin and L-NAME elicited the expected pharmacological responses with dose-dependent increase in QTca (8, 17, 22ms) and BP (mean BP: 12, 21, 34mmHg), respectively. Expected intravascular and tissue reactions were observed at the sites of the BP catheter and the transmitter. Signs of infection (localised to the transmitter implantation site with associated systemic effects) was noted in the fifth animal. No systemic pathologies were seen in any animals. Power analysis (80% power) indicated that the minimal differences which can be detected in a parallel group design (n=6) are 7mmHg (mean BP), 16bpm (HR), 12ms (QTca). DISCUSSION: The M11 implant provided stable, high quality ECG and BP data for a duration covering the length of sub-chronic repeated dose toxicity studies without important impact on toxicological endpoints. Adequate power in order to elucidate major treatment-related cardiovascular effects was demonstrated. However to avoid post-surgical complications the implantation procedures should be carefully considered before using the method.