The fate of active left-side infective endocarditis with operative indication in absence of valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Although the benefits of surgery in infective endocarditis (IE) are clear, an unneglectable proportion of patients do not undergo surgery despite clear operative indication. Outcomes of these patients are poorly reported. With this study, we aim to analyze patient profiles, indication for surgery, decision-making, and outcomes of patients not undergoing surgery despite contemporary surgical indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of single institution database of patients with IE was done to identify patients that, although a clear surgical indication did not receive surgery. We aimed to review the most contemporary practice from June 2014 to December 2018. Only patients who were physically evaluated at our facility were included. Follow up was 100% complete. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival and freedom from a composite outcome of death, stroke, and heart failure. RESULTS: Of the 174 patients with surgical indication during the review period, 46 (27%) did not undergo surgery. The reasons for not pursuing surgery were varied and usually multiple, with severe brain injury and end stage liver disease between the most common. The 30-day mortality was 63%, and the estimated survival at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was respectively 22%, 15%, and 10%. CONCLUSION: The mortality of this cohort of patients is extremely high. A multidisciplinary evaluation is of paramount importance in the decision-making process with shared responsibility for denial of operative options. In a perspective of correct healthcare resources allocation an early palliative care consult may need to be considered in some of those patients.

High readmission rates and mental distress after infective endocarditis - Results from the national population-based CopenHeart IE survey.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe disease requiring lengthy hospitalisation. Little is known about patients' recovery after IE. The aims of this study in IE patients were; (i) to describe mortality, readmission, self-reported health and rehabilitation up to 1year post-discharge, (ii) to examine associations between self-reported health and readmission, and (iii) to investigate predictors of readmission and mortality. METHODS: All adults treated for IE in Denmark, January-June 2011 (N=347), were followed in registers. Eligible individuals (n=209) were invited to participate in a questionnaire survey (responders n=122). Responses were compared with those of a background reference population and a heart valve surgery population. Mortality and readmission data from registers 12months post-discharge were investigated. RESULTS: Patients discharged after treatment for IE had a mortality of 18% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14%-23%) one year post-discharge and 65% (95% CI: 59%-71%) had been readmitted, the majority (82%) acutely. Patients had lower self-reported health compared to the background population (physical component scale (PCS); mean (standard deviation (SD)): 42.2 (11.1) vs. 47.1 (12.1), (p=0.0004), mental component scale (MCS); 50.1 (11.7) vs. 53.8 (9.2), (p=0.006), and more were sedentary (29 vs. 15%), (p=0.002). Large proportions had clinical signs of anxiety and depression, 25% and 22% respectively, exceeding a hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) cut-off score of 8. Almost half (47%) had not been offered cardiac rehabilitation (CR). CONCLUSIONS: After IE, mortality and readmission rates were high and self-reported physical and mental health poor. These findings call for changes in in-hospital and post-discharge management.

Survival and quality of life after aortic root replacement with homografts in acute endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis and native aortic valve endocarditis with abscess formation is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Aortic root replacement with a freestanding aortic homograft is an attractive alternative. We report outcome and quality of life after homograft replacement for infective endocarditis. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with infective prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 31) or native valve endocarditis with abscess (n = 31), operated with homograft replacement were included. Thirty-day mortality, severe operative complications (dialysis, stroke, pacemaker implantation, myocardial infarction, and prolonged mechanical ventilation), midterm survival, reoperations, and quality of life were assessed after a mean follow-up of 37 ± 11 months. RESULTS: Nine patients (15%) died within 30 days and 22 patients (35%) had severe perioperative complications. Preoperative and perioperative variables univariately associated with early mortality were higher (Cleveland Clinic risk score [p = 0.014], extracorporeal circulation time [p = 0.003], prolonged inotropic support [p = 0.03], reoperation for bleeding [p = 0.01], and perioperative myocardial infarction [p < 0.001].) Cumulative survival was 82%, 78%, 75%, and 67% at one, three, five, and ten years, respectively. One patient was reoperated due to recurrence of endocarditis nine months after surgery and one after five years due to homograft failure. Quality of life, as assessed by the 36 item short-form health survey scales for physical and mental health, was not significantly different to an age-matched and gender-matched healthy control group. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute aortic endocarditis treated with homograft replacement is still associated with a substantial early complication rate and mortality. Long-term survival and quality of life are satisfactory in patients surviving the immediate postoperative period.