One-year Outcomes of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Cataract Surgery in the Korean Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (triple procedure) in the South Korean population. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 37 eyes of 36 patients who underwent the UT-DSAEK triple procedure between 2012 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital. Preoperative and postoperative refractive outcomes and endothelial parameters at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were observed. RESULTS: At the final postoperative 12-month period, the average best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 ± 0.5 in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. The mean endothelial cell density at 12 months was 1,841.92 ± 731.24 cells/mm2, indicating no significant endothelial cell loss compared to the baseline (p = 0.128). The mean postoperative central corneal thickness at 12 months was 597.41 ± 86.26 µm. The postoperative mean absolute error at 12 months was 0.96 ± 0.89 diopters (D) and mean error was 0.89 ± 0.97 D. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our South Korean cohort study on UT-DSAEK triple surgery showed favorable and safe outcomes. Regardless of graft thickness, it should be noted that a hyperopic shift of 1.00 to 2.00 D needs to be considered in the case of UT-DSAEK triple surgery.

Artificial Endothelial Layer Implantation After Multiple Failed Keratoplasties.

PURPOSE: Presenting the first case of noncellular corneal endothelial substitute after multiple failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. METHODS: Our case presented with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy after a history of 2 rejected PKs and 1 rejected Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. We implanted an artificial endothelial layer. RESULTS: The implant remained fully attached for a follow-up period of 12 months, and central corneal thickness decreased significantly. The patient reported improvement in her subjective vision, although ocular comorbidities limited the visual potential. CONCLUSIONS: This new device could serve as an alternative to lamellar endothelial corneal transplantation in cases where tissue rejection has occurred and is highly likely to recur. The technique is simple, and the deswelling effect on the cornea persisted, although the visual results require further validation in patients with a higher visual potential.

Combined or sequential DMEK in cases of cataract and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (sequential DMEK) and DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (combined DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and Scopus. Comparative studies reporting sequential DMEK and combined DMEK in FECD patients were included. The main outcome measure of the study was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement. Secondary outcomes were postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate and primary graft failure rate. Bias risk was assessed and a quality appraisal of the body of evidence was completed using the Cochrane Robin-I tool. A total of 667 eyes (5 studies) were included in this review, 292 eyes (43.77%) underwent a combined DMEK, while 375 (56.22%) eyes underwent a sequential DMEK surgery. We found no evidence of a difference between the two groups (mean difference, 95% CI) regarding: (1) CDVA improvement (-0.06; -0.14, 0.03 LogMAR; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86); (2) postoperative ECD (-62; -190, 67 cells/mm2 ; 4 studies, I2 : 67%; p = 0.35); (3) rebubbling (risks ratio: 1.04; 0.59, 1.85; 4 studies, I2 : 48%; p = 0.89); and primary graft failure rate (risks ratio: 0.91; 0.32, 2.57; 3 studies, I2 : 0%; p = 0.86). Of all the 5 non-randomized studies, all (100%) were graded as low quality. The overall quality of the analysed studies was low. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm no difference or superiority of one approach in terms of CDVA, endothelial cell count and postoperative complication rate between the two arms.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of DSEK and DMEK in Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the long-term endothelial cell loss, graft survival, and clinical outcomes in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using a standardized surgical protocol. METHODS: Three hundred and six consecutive DSEK and DMEK grafts of 223 patients with FED performed by 8 surgeons between January 2006 and August 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome measures were graft survival, endothelial cell loss, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: At 5 years, graft survival was 96% for both DSEK and DMEK eyes. The mean percentage of endothelial cell loss was 57.7 ± 17.1 in DSEK and 56.8 ± 15.2 in DMEK eyes ( P = 0.430). The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.13 ± 0.14 logMAR in DSEK and 0.01 ± 0.18 logMAR in DMEK grafts ( P <0.00001) at 5 years postoperatively. Rebubbling was performed in 7.8% DSEK and 2.1% DMEK grafts ( P = 0.441). Cox regression identified rejection episodes (HR 6.5; 95% CI: 1.70-24.8; P = 0.0062) as a significant contributing factor for graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK had superior visual acuity outcomes compared with DSEK in these patients up to 5 years after surgery. At 5 years, there was no significant difference in graft survival or endothelial cell loss between DSEK and DMEK eyes with FED. We propose that our standardized technique reduces the need for rebubbling.

Retrospective Study of Preoperative Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Versus Intraoperative Surgical Peripheral Iridectomy in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and surgical peripheral iridectomy (SPI) for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and DMEK with cataract extraction (triple DMEK). METHODS: This retrospective interventional study included 135 eyes of 135 patients who underwent DMEK alone or triple DMEK. Primary outcomes were graft detachments necessitating rebubbling, repeat grafts, and pupillary block. The secondary outcomes included rejection, cystoid macular edema, uveitis, intraoperative hyphema, visual disturbances, and surgical time. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes in the LPI group and 104 eyes in the SPI group were included. Fifty-six eyes had DMEK alone, and 79 had triple DMEK. Visually significant graft detachments occurred in 7 of 31 eyes in the LPI group versus 19 of 104 eyes in the SPI group ( P = 0.61). No statistical significance in DMEK alone versus triple DMEK groups ( P = 0.61 vs. P > 0.99). Two patients in the LPI group and 5 in the SPI group required regraft ( P = 0.66). One (3.2%) experienced pupillary block compared with 5 (4.8%) ( P = 0.99) in the LPI and SPI groups, respectively. Secondary outcomes were similar in both groups ranging from 0% to 3% ( P > 0.99). None had visual disturbances. In DMEK alone, duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the LPI versus SPI group (32.8 vs. 44.1 minutes, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated similar outcomes between LPI and SPI, although the LPI group had a shorter duration of surgery when DMEK was performed alone. The remainder of the outcomes demonstrated no statistically significant differences.

Outcomes and Early Complications Using an Endothelium-in Pull-Through Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Technique With Preloaded Versus Surgeon-Loaded Donor Tissue in Fuchs Patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare outcomes and early complications using an endothelium-in pull-through Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) technique with preloaded versus surgeon-loaded donor tissue. METHODS: Data from 163 eyes of 125 patients at the Wilmer Eye Institute diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy who underwent DMEK with or without cataract extraction using surgeon-loaded tissue (n = 83) or preloaded tissue (n = 80) were reviewed. Best-corrected visual acuity and early postoperative complications including small graft detachment (less than one third of the graft area), large graft detachment (more than one third), graft failure, and rebubbling were compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics including age, sex, and visual acuity were not statistically different between the groups. Small graft detachment was observed in 18.1% of the surgeon-loaded and 22.5% of the preloaded group ( P = 0.48), whereas large detachment occurred in 12.0% and 5.0%, respectively ( P = 0.11). Among these, rebubbling was performed in 18 (21.7%) in the surgeon-loaded compared with 12 (15.0%) in the preloaded group ( P = 0.27). The rebubbling rate of the combined procedure (cataract surgery and DMEK) was 21.8% and of DMEK alone was 7.7% ( P = 0.048). Primary graft failure occurred in 2 surgeon-loaded cases (2.4%) and 1 preloaded case (1.3%) ( P = 0.58). There was no difference in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.21 ± 0.25 for the surgeon-loaded vs. 0.16 ± 0.16 for the preloaded group, P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK surgery using preloaded endothelium-in tissue has comparable outcomes with surgeon-loaded endothelium-in tissue. However, there was a trend toward the lower rebubbling rate in DMEK alone compared with combined procedures.

Comparison of efficacy of three gases for anterior chamber tamponade in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of three different gases for intraocular tamponade: 100% air, 10% perfluoropropane (C3F8), and 10% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 138 patients who underwent DMEK were reviewed retrospectively, with the primary outcome being the rebubbling rate in the first week following surgery. Other clinical outcomes, such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), incidence of rebubbling after the first week, endothelial cell density (ECD), graft detachment, graft failure, pupillary block, and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 138 patients, 57 were in group 1 (treated with air), 44 in group 2 (treated with 10% C3F8), and 37 in group 3 (treated with 10% SF6). Group 3 showed significantly lower rates of graft detachment and rebubbling compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative BCVA among the groups. At one year, the mean endothelial cell loss was 32% in group 1, 30% in group 2, and 33% in group 3 (P=0.715). One patient in group 1 experienced pupillary block and increased IOP, while there were no such occurrences in the other groups. There was no difference between the groups in terms of graft failure. CONCLUSION: The use of 10% SF6 in DMEK surgery may be a good option due to its efficacy in preventing graft detachment, low rebubbling rate, and potential for minimizing complications.

New forceps free injection technique for delivering descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty preloaded endothelium-in grafts.

PURPOSE: To describe a new method for delivering DMEK grafts into the recipient's eye with endothelium inward configuration using a no-forceps injection technique. METHODS: We retrospectively review 11 patients that underwent DMEK surgery at our institution using a no-forceps injection technique. The graft was preloaded into an intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and connected to an anterior chamber maintainer (ACM). A 5 ml non luer lock syringe was inserted into the other end of the ACM to create a one-flow system. The cartridge was inserted into the posterior end of an injector, and the graft was successfully delivered into the recipient's eye. RESULT: Twelve eyes of 11 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 9.16 ± 1.3 months. At baseline, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.76 ± 0.13 logMAr and mean endothelial cell density (ECD) was 2619.00 ± 115.89 cells/mm2. At follow-up, BCVA significantly improved to 0.22 ± 0.05 logMAR (p = 0.003). Although we observed a significant reduction in ECD at follow-up (1688 ± 182.20, p = 0.002), our patients lost only 35.69 ± 6.36% of endothelial cells. CONCLUSION: Our technique can help surgeons safely deliver an endothelium-in graft into the recipient's eye. The method doesn't require the use of a forceps, minimizing the risk of endothelial cell loss or graft damage.

Cost Drivers of Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine cost drivers of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) through evaluation of surgical costs and procedure length based on type of EK, use of preloaded grafts, and performance of simultaneous cataract surgery. DESIGN: This study was an economic analysis of EKs at a single academic institution using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology. PARTICIPANTS: Endothelial keratoplasty surgical cases, including Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2016 to 2018 were included in the analysis. METHODS: Data and inputs were obtained via the electronic health record (EHR) and from prior literature. Simultaneous cataract surgeries were included and separately categorized for analysis. Endothelial keratoplasty expenses were determined with TDABC, a method for cost calculation that incorporates the time that key resources are used and each resource's associated cost rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included surgery length (in minutes) and day-of-surgery costs. RESULTS: There were 559 EKs included: 355 DMEKs and 204 DSAEKs. Fewer DSAEKs had simultaneous cataract extraction (47; 23%) than DMEK (169; 48%). Of the DMEKs, 196 (55%) used preloaded corneal grafts. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cost $392.31 less (95% confidence interval, $251.05-$533.57; P < 0.0001) than DSAEK and required 16.94 fewer minutes (14.16-19.73; P < 0.0001). Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cases that used preloaded corneal grafts cost $460.19 less ($316.23-$604.14; P < 0.0001) and were 14.16 minutes shorter (11.39-16.93; P < 0.0001). In multivariate regression, preloaded graft use saved $457.19, DMEK (compared with DSAEK) saved $349.97, and simultaneous cataract surgery added $855.17 in day-of-surgery costs. CONCLUSIONS: Cost analysis of TDABC identified a day-of-surgery cost and surgical time reduction associated with the use of preloaded grafts for DMEK, DMEK compared with DSAEK, and isolated EK compared with EK combined with cataract surgery. This study provides an improved understanding of surgical cost drivers and margin incentivization, which may explain trends and indirectly influence patient care decisions in cornea surgery practices. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Outcomes of cystoid macular edema following Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in a referral center for keratoplasty in Spain: retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of eyes with visually significant cystoid macular œdema (vs-CMO) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a referral center for keratoplasty in Spain. We conducted a retrospective, single-surgeon case series of eyes that developed post-DMEK vs-CMO performed between January 2011 and December 2020. Data collected included: indication for DMEK; biometric data; ocular comorbidities; past medical history; time to detection of vs-CMO after DMEK (T, weeks); best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT, µm) at diagnosis of vs-CMO, after resolution of CMO, and at last follow-up; and management strategy. Main outcomes analyzed were incidence of vs-CMO, improvement in BCVA and CRT after treatment of vs-CMO. Of 291 consecutive DMEK surgeries, 14 eyes of 13 patients (4.8%) developed vs-CMO. Five patients (38.5%) had history of CMO, and 28.6% of eyes had ophthalmic comorbidities. Median (P25-P75) T was 4 (3-10) weeks. Treatment success was observed in 12/13 eyes (92.3%), two of which required second-line treatment. In successful cases (median time-to-resolution 3.0 (2.0-3.5) months), median BCVA improved from 0.60 (0.40-0.80) logMAR to 0.30 (0.15-0.40) logMAR (p = 0.002) after treatment, and median CRT improved from 582.5 (400.0-655.0) µm to 278.0 (258.0-294.0) µm (p = 0.005). In our study, we found a 4.8% rate of post-DMEK vs-CMO, with most cases occurring in the first 3 months after surgery. Good functional and anatomical outcomes are expected in most eyes, without treatment-related complications or implications in graft outcomes. Additional studies are encouraged to determine a standardized protocol for post-DMEK vs-CMO.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachments in superior versus temporal approach.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment rate comparing superior versus temporal main incision approach. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study on patients who underwent DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy with main wound incision performed at either 90° in the superior approach, or at 180°/0° in the temporal approach. All main incisions were secured with a single 10-0 nylon suture at the end of surgery. Data collected were donor age and gender, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and gender, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, re-bubbling rate, air fill in the anterior chamber (AC) at day one and intra- and early postoperative complications. RESULTS: 187 eyes were included in the study. 99 eyes had DMEK surgery with superior approach, while 88 eyes had temporal approach. The two groups had no differences in donor age and sex, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and sex, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, and air fill in the anterior chamber at day one. Re-bubbling rate was 38.4% for surgeries performed with superior access and 29.5% for those with temporal access(p = 0.186). After exclusion of patients with intraoperative and/or postoperative complication, the difference in re-bubbling rate was higher, although non-significant (37.5% and 25% for superior and temporal approach respectively, p = 0.098). CONCLUSION: The temporal approach in DMEK showed a trend towards a clinically significant lower rate of post-operative re-bubbling compared to the superior approach, however, no statistically significant difference was noted comparing the two approaches, which both remain feasible options in DMEK surgery.

Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With Endothelium Inward: A 24-Month Comparative Analysis Between Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy and Bullous Keratopathy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) between Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and bullous keratopathy (BK). METHODS: In this single-center retrospective clinical case series, 71 eyes of 64 patients indicated with FECD (62%) or BK (38%) (with or without cataract) were treated with preloaded DMEK grafts between March 2018 and February 2020. Standard DMEK peeling, followed by manual folding of the tissue with endothelium-inward orientation and storing in a preloaded fashion inside a 2.2-mm intraocular lens cartridge. All tissues were delivered using a bimanual pull-through technique, followed by air tamponade. Graft unfolding time, endothelial cell loss, corrected distance visual acuity, central corneal thickness, rebubbling rate, and intraoperative and postoperative complications at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were recorded. RESULTS: The mean intraoperative graft unfolding time in FECD did not differ from the BK group ( P = 0.6061). Cystoid macular edema did not differ in either group ( P = 0.6866). The rebubbling rate was found to be significantly higher in FECD compared with the BK group ( P = 0.0423). Corrected distance visual acuity significantly improved at the first month after surgery ( P = 0.0012), with no differences between FECD and BK at 24 months ( P = 0.2578). Central corneal thickness was stable postoperatively and showed no differences between the groups ( P = 0.3693). Significantly higher endothelial cell counts were observed in the FECD group at 24 months ( P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Preloaded DMEK with "endothelium-in" offers acceptable intraoperative time, rebubbling rate, and clinical outcomes in both FECD and BK groups. Patients with FECD show better postoperative clinical outcomes even if the rebubbling rate is relatively high.

Rebubbling and graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using a standardised protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse risk factors and long-term outcomes after rebubbling and graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: 176 consecutive DMEK grafts of 125 patients performed by 8 surgeons with a standardised technique between January 2015 and July 2022 were analysed. Main outcome measures were graft detachments, rebubbling rate, postoperative outcomes, and risk factors for graft failure and rebubbling. RESULTS: 6 (3.4%) grafts required rebubbling (>1/3 area detached). 40 (22.7%) grafts developed self-resolving partial detachments (<1/3 area detached). The mean time to rebubble was 16 ± 9.4 days. Mean BSCVAs at 5 years postoperative were 0.03 ± 0.16, 0.03 ± 0.14, and 0.15 ± 0.31 logMAR in fully attached, partially detached and rebubbled grafts (P = 0.437). 5-year graft survival were 98%, 90%, and 83% in fully attached, partially detached and rebubbled eyes (P = 0.02). There was significantly greater endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the rebubbled eyes (P = 0.018). Intraoperative trauma was a risk factor for graft failure (HR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.50; P = 0.023). An indication for surgery other than Fuchs endothelial dystrophy was a risk factor for rebubbling (HR 5.28; 95% CI: 5.11-72.4; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: DMEK grafts had better graft survival if there was no partial detachment or rebubbling at 5 years postop. There was significant ECL associated with rebubbling. A standardised technique reduces rebubbling and graft failure risk.

The usefulness of lutein/trypan blue vital dye for the staining of corneal endothelium: a pilot study on DMEK pretreated tissues.

PURPOSE: The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of lutein/trypan blue vital dye for the staining of corneal tissues and endothelium-Descemet membrane (EDM) for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: Sixteen human corneal tissues (Eye Bank, Rome, Italy) were used. Corneal endothelium was tested at 25 s (T0), 1 min (T1), 2 min (T2), and 4 min (T4) from dye addition. Staining intensity and cell counting were compared. Stripped EDM was analyzed for selected apoptotic (AP, caspases, BCL2, BAX) and differentiation (VEGF-A, TGF-ß1RI, SMAD3/7, SMA) targets and changes in target expression. Protein extracts were analyzed through SDS-PAGE/IB. RESULTS: Although trypan blue staining produced the same color intensity of lutein/trypan blue dye in half the time, lutein/trypan blue reached a good and adequate color intensity at T4, which persisted even on excised and washed EDM grafts. Lutein/trypan blue-stained EDM showed a reduced number of blue-stained cells and AP immunoreactivity was significantly reduced in the same samples. An increased BCL2 transcript and a reduced BAX transcript were detected in lutein/trypan blue-stained EDM. No significant changes were observed for the main effector caspases (3/9) upon both treatments and the target genes representative of endothelial cell trans-differentiation (TGF-ß1RI, SMAD3/7, SMA). A trend in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) regulation was observed in lutein/trypan blue-treated EDM grafts. CONCLUSION: Obtained results suggest that lutein/trypan blue dye deserves attention in the DMEK field and support the potential routine use of this dye as a valid alternative to trypan blue for all procedures devoted to the assessment of endothelial cell viability and visualization of EDM graft before DMEK grafting.

Surgical goniolens for tag identification and removal in DMEK surgery.

INTRODUCTION: We describe a novel technique for identifying endothelial Descemet membrane (DM) tags remaining after descemetorhexis in patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery. METHODS: A surgical goniolens is applied to the corneal surface after descemetorhexis in order to visualize the peripheral inner corneal layer at 360° and identify endothelial-DM tags. RESULTS: A detailed visualization of the peripheral inner corneal layer is possible using goniolens, without using any staining in the anterior chamber. CONCLUSION: The technique may be used to screen the posterior corneal surface for any retained endothelial-DM tags. It may to lower the risk of remaining tags and indirectly lower the incidence of DMEK graft detachment.

Yogurt Technique for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation: Early Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Yogurt technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent DMEK combined or not with phacoemulsification surgery using donor tissues prepared by a surgeon with the DMEK Tzamalis disposable punch at 2 referral hospitals between October 2019 and June 2021. Primary outcomes were duration of graft preparation, surgeon grading of graft quality, and endothelial cell density measured at 1 and 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 and 6 months postoperatively and DMEK intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in this study. The mean DMEK graft preparation time was 7.2 ± 1.4 minutes. Donor grafts were rated good in 67.3% of cases (33 of 49), sufficient in 24.5% (12 of 49), and poor in 8.2% (4 of 49). Donor mean endothelial cell density was 2580 ± 155 preoperatively, which were reduced to 2269 ± 191 ( P < 0.000) and 1697 ± 142 ( P < 0.0001) at 1 and 6 months, respectively. No significant difference was found in graft preparation outcome ( P = 0.543). The preoperative BCVA was 0.65 ± 0.44 logMAR, which improved to 0.31 ± 0.43 logMAR ( P < 0.0001) and 0.12 ± 0.14 logMAR ( P < 0.0001) at 1 and 6 months after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the DMEK Tzamalis punch can be used as an effective and safe method for DMEK graft preparation with a shallow learning curve that allows it to be successfully performed by relatively inexperienced surgeons.

The need of rebubbling in case of small graft detachments after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

PURPOSE: To investigate the need of rebubbling for small graft detachments after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this retrospective study we evaluated 111 eyes from 111 patients that showed graft detachment after DMEK surgery and have achieved graft adherence by injection of air or 20% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) to the anterior chamber (rebubbling group; n = 57) or by spontaneous adherence without intervention (control group; n = 54) at final examination. Subgroups in terms of the maximum height and in terms of the detachment area in relation to graft area were formed. Outcome measures were the increase in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the decrease in central corneal thickness (CCT) from the measurement before DMEK to six months after surgery and postoperative endothelial cell density. RESULTS: BCVA increased in the rebubbling group and the control group, the difference being 0.22 logMAR, p = 0.048. For eyes with a maximum height less than 500 µm, the increase of BCVA was 0.39 ± 0,36 logMAR in the control group and 0.62 ± 0,53 logMAR in the rebubbling group, p = 0.045. There was no difference of statistical significance of BCVA between both groups regarding the detachment area of less than 20% in relation to graft area. The mean decrease in CCT and postoperative endothelial cell density showed no significant difference between the rebubbling group and the control group. CONCLUSION: Compared to spontaneous graft adherence, a rebubbling shows no beneficial effect on the clinical outcome for small detached DMEK grafts. Rebubbling does not decrease postoperative endothelial cell density.

Posterior stromal ripples increase risk of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachment worsening over time.

PURPOSE: To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) features of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts associated with graft attachment worsening over time. METHODS: Retrospective case series on patients who received uncomplicated DMEK surgery and for whom subsequent AS-OCT data were available for analysis. Patients' demographics and surgical details were collected. AS-OCT was analysed for graft detachment axial extension, presence of posterior stromal ripples, quadrant involvement (location and number), degree of detachment extension, peripheral roll, presence and amount of air in the anterior chamber (AC). Features associated with re-bubbling and graft detachment worsening over time were identified. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 9.8 years (63% females) were included. AS-OCT was performed at 2.9 ± 2.4 days after surgery. AS-OCT factors associated with re-bubbling were posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.004) and detachment axial extension (p < 0.001). At first follow-up, of the 147 DMEK, 67 showed complete attachment and 80 partial detachment. In those cases of initially completely attached grafts, posterior stromal ripples were associated with the risk of subsequent graft detachment (p = 0.014) together with recipient age (p = 0.043), phaco-combined surgery (p = 0.018) and AS-OCT timing (p = 0.033); while, in the initially partially detached grafts, detachment worsening was associated with posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.025), detachment axial extension (p = 0.003), degrees of detachment involvement (p = 0.029), peripheral roll-in shape (p = 0.033) and presence of air in the AC (p = 0.032). Relative risk (RR) of graft detachment worsening in patients with moderate/severe posterior stromal ripples was 1.75 (95% CI = 1.09-2.81). CONCLUSION: Posterior stromal ripples and detachment axial extension >1/3 of graft surface area were the main risk factors for detachment worsening over time, and patients showing these features should be monitored closely to identify the need for re-bubbling at an early stage, thus improving surgical outcomes.

Thinning rate over 24 months in ultrathin DSAEK.

AIM: To describe the changes in corneal graft thickness following ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) comparing pre- and postoperative values over a 24-month period. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center case series, patients who received eye bank-prepared tissues for UT-DSAEK surgery were included. Preoperative and postoperative graft thickness measurements were determined in the eye bank and in clinic using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images. Graft thickness measurements and their percentage change between preoperative values and values at 1 day, 1 week and 1, 6, 12, 24 months were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 47 eyes of 47 patients with a mean age of 69 ± 11 years (29 males) were included. Twnty-three patients had Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (49%) and the remaining 24 had pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (51%). In total, 29/47 eyes underwent UT-DSAEK alone (62%) and 18/47 received combined cataract surgery as a triple procedure (38%). Preoperative donor graft thickness was 92 ± 28 µm. Compared to preoperative values, where graft thickness increased to 194 ± 101.3 µm at 1 day, 151.1 ± 71.4 µm at 1 week, and 108.4 ± 52.5 µm at 1 month. Graft thickness continued to gradually decrease over time until 6 months (91.7 ± 33.6 µm), and then plateaued at 12 months (83.9 ± 25.0 µm), showing minimal changes at 2 years (101.4 ± 37.5 µm). CONCLUSION: Preoperative DSAEK graft thickness measurements as reported by the eye bank are a valid approximation of DSAEK graft thickness at 6 months after surgery and these measurements tend to stabilize over time up to 2 years after surgery.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Combination with Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Complex Eyes for Enhanced Gas Tamponades. / Descemet-Membran-Endothel-Keratoplastik in Kombination mit Pars-plana-Vitrektomie in komplexen Augen zur extensiven Gastamponade.

BACKGROUND: DMEK is well-established to treat endothelial corneal diseases. The procedure involves the use of an anterior chamber gastamponade to attach the graft. In eyes after lense extraction, fistulating glaucoma surgery or with large iris defects the gas tamponade is often lost postoperatively in the vitreous cavity or subconjunctival. We are reporting on three cases below, in which simultaneous anterior and posterior chamber gas tamponade were inserted with a combination of DMEK and 23-G pars plana vitrectomy (ppV). CASE DESCRIPTIONS: In the first case, a 70-year-old man experienced complete gas dislocation into the vitreous cavity early on after DMEK, resulting in re-bubbling being carried out in combination with 23-G ppV. In the second case, DMEK was immediately combined with ppV for an 80-year-old man who had an Ahmed glaucoma implant, and for a 61-year-old woman, our third case, who had traumatic aphakia. In all three cases, the vitreous cavity and anterior chamber were filled with 20% SF 6 as much as possible. In the second case, it was necessary to perform a re-bubbling due to partial graft dehiscence that occurred on the fifth day post-DMEK. The intraocular pressure in all three cases remained compensated postoperatively, and visual acuity increased despite the complex pre-existing conditions that had limited vision prior. DISCUSSION: The combined endotamponade of the anterior and posterior chambers while performing DMEK with 23-G ppV can extend the gas endotamponade in patients whose eyes have a complex medical history, and can thus ensure successful graft adherence.