Twenty four-month follow-up after bullectomy, unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction surgery: a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: While pharmacologic therapy remains the cornerstone of lung emphysema treatment, surgery is an additional therapeutic option in selected patient groups with advanced emphysema. The aim of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is to improve lung function, exercise capacity, quality of life and survival. We sought to determine the therapeutic value of surgical resection in specific patients with lung emphysema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed consisting of 58 patients with lung emphysema who underwent surgical intervention over a 10-year period and were followed for 2 years postoperatively. The clinical characteristics recorded were FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), the 6-min walk test (6-MWT), the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), body mass index (BMI) and quality of life prior to and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgical intervention. Moreover, all peri- and post-operative complications were noted. RESULTS: Out of 58 emphysema patients (72% male, FEV1 (L) 2.21 ± 0.17, RV (L) 3.39 ± 0.55), 19 underwent surgical bullectomy, 31 unilateral LVRS and 8 sequential bilateral LVRS. Six months after surgery, there was a statistically significant improvement in FEV1, RV, TLC, 6-MWT and mMRC. Over a period of 12 to 24 months postoperatively, clinical benefit gradually declines most likely due to COPD progression but patients still experienced a significant improvement in FEV1. The most common postoperative complications were persistent air leakage (> 7 days), arrhythmia and subcutaneous emphysema in 60%, 51.6% and 22.4%, respectively. No deaths were observed after surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: In a selected patient population, surgery led to significant improvement of lung function parameters, exercise capacity and quality of life. Over a period of 12 to 24 months postoperatively, clinical benefit gradually decreased most likely due to COPD progression.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction as the Treatment of Choice versus Robotic-Assisted Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Similar Patients with Emphysema - An Initial Experience of the Benefits and Complications.

Objective: There is an assumption that because EBLVR requires less use of hospital resources, offsetting the higher cost of endobronchial valves, it should therefore be the treatment of choice wherever possible. We have tested this hypothesis in a retrospective analysis of the two in similar groups of patients. Methods: In a 4-year experience, we performed 177 consecutive LVR procedures: 83 patients underwent Robot Assisted Thoracoscopic (RATS) LVRS and 94 EBLVR. EBLVR was intentionally precluded by evidence of incomplete fissure integrity or intra-operative assessment of collateral ventilation. Unilateral RATS LVRS was performed in these cases together with those with unsuitable targets for EBLVR. Results: EBLVR was uncomplicated in 37 (39%) cases; complicated by post-procedure spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) in 28(30%) and required revision in 29 (31%). In the LVRS group, 7 (8%) patients were readmitted with treatment-related complications, but no revisional procedure was needed. When compared with uncomplicated EBLVR, LVRS had a significantly longer operating time: 85 (14-82) vs 40 (15-151) minutes (p<0.001) and hospital stay: 7.5 (2-80) vs 2 (1-14) days (p<0.01). However, LVRS had a similar total operating time to both EBLVR requiring revision: 78 (38-292) minutes and hospital stay to EBLVR complicated by pneumothorax of 11.5 (6.5-24.25) days. Use of critical care was significantly longer in RATS group, and it was also significantly longer in EBV with SP group than in uncomplicated EBV group. Conclusion: Endobronchial LVR does use less hospital resources than RATS LVRS in comparable groups if the recovery is uncomplicated. However, this advantage is lost if one includes the resources needed for the treatment of complications and revisional procedures. Any decision to favour EBLVR over LVRS should not be based on the assumption of a smoother, faster perioperative course.

Design of the multicentre randomised controlled BENTO trial to demonstrate patient-relevant benefit of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using thermal vapour ablation in the German healthcare system for patients with upper lobe emphysema: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Application of vapour ablation as a novel approach to lung volume reduction has positive effects in patients with severe emphysema. The BENTO study is a randomised, controlled, open, multicentre trial, to assess the effects of bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation (BTVA) in the German healthcare system. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with bilateral heterogeneous emphysema of the upper lobes in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 3/4 will be enrolled in this trial and will receive either standard medical management alone (according to GOLD guidelines) or BTVA treatment with the InterVapor system together with standard medical management. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio (treatment group:control group). A total of 224 patients will be enrolled at 15 study sites. The primary endpoint is the change in patient-reported disease-specific quality of life, as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients between randomisation and the 9-month follow-up visit. Secondary endpoints include adverse events, mortality, vital status, changes in lung function parameters, exercise capacity and other efficacy measures at 3, 9 and 12 months.The BENTO trial was commissioned by the German Federal Joint Committee, to demonstrate that this approach is an efficient and safe treatment option in the German healthcare system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the lead ethics committee in Germany (Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg) and until present also by the following ethics committees: Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Duisburg-Essen, Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ethics Committee of the State Medical Association of Hessen, Ethics Commission of the State Office for Health and Social Affairs of the State of Berlin, Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Greifswald. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05717192.

[Efficacy and Safety of Medical Thoracoscopic Bulla Volume Reduction in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Combined With Giant Emphysematous Bullae]. / ç»å† ç§‘èƒ¸è ”é•œè‚ºå¤§ç–±å‡å®¹æœ¯æ²»ç–—æ ¢æ€§é˜»å¡žæ€§è‚ºç–¾ç— åˆå¹¶å·¨åž‹è‚ºå¤§ç–±çš„ç–—æ•ˆå’Œå®‰å ¨æ€§ç ”ç©¶.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of medical thoracoscopic bulla volume reduction for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) combined with giant emphysematous bullae (GEB). Methods: A total of 66 patients with COPD combined with GEB were enrolled in the study. All the subjects received treatment at Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated with Zhengzhou University between March 2021 and December 2022. The subjects were divided into two groups, a medical thoracoscope group consisting of 30 cases treated with medical thoracoscopic bulla volume reduction and a surgical thoracoscope group consisting of 36 cases treated by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. All patients were followed up before discharge and 3 months and 6 months after discharge. The preoperative and postoperative levels of the pulmonary function, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores and differences in postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The operative duration, postoperative length-of-stay, and surgical costs and hospitalization bills, and the maximum visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 24 h after the procedure were assessed. Results: The baseline data of the two groups were comparable, showing no statistically significant difference. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 6 months after the procedures improved in both the medical thoracoscopy group ([0.78±0.29] L vs. [1.02±0.31] L, P<0.001) and the surgical thoracoscopy group ([0.80±0.21] L vs. [1.03±0.23] L, P<0.001) compared to that before the procedures. Improvements to a certain degree in 6MWT and SGRQ scores were also observed in the two groups at 3 months and 6 months after the procedures (P<0.05). In addition, no statistically significant difference in these indexes was observed during the follow-up period of the patients in the two groups. There was no significant difference in operating time between the two groups. The medical thoracoscopy group had shorter postoperative length-of-stay ([7.3±2.6] d) and 24-hour postoperative VAS pain scores (3.0 [2.0, 3.3]) than the surgical thoracoscopic group did ([10.4±4.3] d and 4.5 [3.0, 5.0], respectively), with the differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). Surgical cost and total hospitalization bills were lower in the medical thoracoscopy group than those in the surgical thoracoscopy group (P<0.05). The complication rate in the medical thoracoscopy group was lower than that in the surgical thoracoscopy group (46.7% vs. 52.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Medical thoracoscopic reduction of bulla volume can significantly improve the pulmonary function, quality of life, and exercise tolerance of patients with COPD combined with GEB, and it can reduce postoperative short-term pain and shorten postoperative length-of-stay. The procedure has the advantages of minimal invasiveness, quick recovery, and low costs. Hence extensive clinical application is warranted.

Endobronchial coil lung volume reduction performed on patients with emphysema dominant COPD: Long term follow-up results.

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a commonly seen, preventable, and treatable disease with permanent respiratory symptoms and air entrapment that is caused by particle exposure. In case of limited response to traditional treatment protocols, lung volume reduction may be performed in patients with emphysema dominant patterns. In this study, long term follow-up results of the patients who had been operated on by minimal invasive bronchoscopic lung volume reduction surgery by coil placement were reported. Materials and Methods: Records of the patients operated on by coil placement were retrospectively investigated, and pulmonary function test (PFT), echocardiography (ECHO), six-minute walking test (6MWT), tomography images, ventilation scintigraphy, and clinical summaries were evaluated. Out of 34 initial candidates, 18 patients were included in the study. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's rho were utilized to compare interventions and follow-up testing. Result: The average age of 18 patients was 62 (50-74) years, and except for one patient, all were males (n= 17). Fifteen patients were operated bilaterally, and the rest were unilaterally operated, with an average of 10 coils placed per coil placement. An average of 90 days was between bronchoscopic coil placement, with a follow-up duration of 45 days in between. Mean total follow-up duration was 794 (± 424) days. Pneumonia and pneumonitis were seen in 33% of patients within the first month. Mortality from respiratory causes was found to be 11%, while mortality from all causes was found to be 22%. Statistical difference was observed regarding 6MWT after bronchoscopic volume reduction when compared the initial preoperative values. However, this difference was later lost statistically at the second follow-up performed after the completion of both sides. A benefit in improved resting saturation was observed after the second procedure, which was not evident after unilateral intervention. However, similiar to 6MWT, this benefit was lost at the second follow-up, with resting saturation instead being effected negatively. No difference was observed in PFT results; however, a correlation was seen between FEV1 and walking distance. No specific correlation had been seen in the ECHO evaluation. Conclusions: Benefits regarding 6MWT and resting saturation were observed in patients undergoing minimal invasive bronchoscopic lung volume reduction surgery with coils. This benefit was evident in the short term but was lost as the follow-up duration increased. A relatively high morbidity and mortality rate was also present, further stating the risky nature of pulmonary intervention, even minimally invasive procedures, on patients with COPD.

Body composition impacts outcome of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema: a fully automated CT-based analysis.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive and irreversible airflow limitation, with individual body composition influencing disease severity. Severe emphysema worsens symptoms through hyperinflation, which can be relieved by bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR). To investigate how body composition, assessed through CT scans, impacts outcomes in emphysema patients undergoing BLVR. Fully automated CT-based body composition analysis (BCA) was performed in patients with end-stage emphysema receiving BLVR with valves. Post-interventional muscle and adipose tissues were quantified, body size-adjusted, and compared to baseline parameters. Between January 2015 and December 2022, 300 patients with severe emphysema underwent endobronchial valve treatment. Significant improvements were seen in outcome parameters, which were defined as changes in pulmonary function, physical performance, and quality of life (QoL) post-treatment. Muscle volume remained stable (1.632 vs. 1.635 for muscle bone adjusted ratio (BAR) at baseline and after 6 months respectively), while bone adjusted adipose tissue volumes, especially total and pericardial adipose tissue, showed significant increase (2.86 vs. 3.00 and 0.16 vs. 0.17, respectively). Moderate to strong correlations between bone adjusted muscle volume and weaker correlations between adipose tissue volumes and outcome parameters (pulmonary function, QoL and physical performance) were observed. Particularly after 6-month, bone adjusted muscle volume changes positively corresponded to improved outcomes (ΔForced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], r = 0.440; ΔInspiratory vital capacity [IVC], r = 0.397; Δ6Minute walking distance [6MWD], r = 0.509 and ΔCOPD assessment test [CAT], r = -0.324; all p < 0.001). Group stratification by bone adjusted muscle volume changes revealed that groups with substantial muscle gain experienced a greater clinical benefit in pulmonary function improvements, QoL and physical performance (ΔFEV1%, 5.5 vs. 39.5; ΔIVC%, 4.3 vs. 28.4; Δ6MWDm, 14 vs. 110; ΔCATpts, -2 vs. -3.5 for groups with ΔMuscle, BAR% < -10 vs. > 10, respectively). BCA results among patients divided by the minimal clinically important difference for forced expiratory volume of the first second (FEV1) showed significant differences in bone-adjusted muscle and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) volumes and their respective changes after 6 months (ΔMuscle, BAR% -5 vs. 3.4 and ΔIMAT, BAR% -0.62 vs. 0.60 for groups with ΔFEV1 ≤ 100 mL vs > 100 mL). Altered body composition, especially increased muscle volume, is associated with functional improvements in BLVR-treated patients.

Delayed targeted atelectasis in a case of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves.

A woman in her late 60s with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema underwent bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBV) to address hyperinflation. The initial EBV placement has led to partial lobar atelectasis of the left lower lobe and resulted in significant improvement in the patient's symptoms and lung function. However, valve migration occurred later due to pneumothorax unrelated to valves, leading to suboptimal clinical improvement. The patient achieved delayed full lobar atelectasis 21 months after EBV placement, which led to a significant clinical improvement. The patient decided to be delisted from the lung transplant list due to the improvement. This case highlights the importance of considering delayed atelectasis as a possible outcome of EBV placement and suggests the need for further exploration of the long-term implications and associations of this procedure.

Optimizing clinical outcomes for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valves.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with Zephyr one-way valves is an effective guideline-based treatment option for patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation. However, in some cases the treatment response is less than anticipated or there might be a loss of initial treatment effect. Reasons for the lack of response can include incorrect assessment of collateral ventilation, improper valve placement, or patient related factors. Loss of initial benefit can be due to granulation tissue formation and subsequent valve dysfunction, or there may be side effects such as excessive coughing or infectious problems. Careful follow-up after treatment with valves is important and evaluation with a CT scan and/or bronchoscopy is helpful if there is no improvement after treatment or loss of initial benefit. This paper aims to describe the most important causes and provide a strategy of how to approach and manage these patients.

Sublobar resection or lobectomy and postoperative respiratory complications in emphysematous lungs.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary resection in patients with severe emphysema may impact postoperative respiratory complications. Low-attenuation areas evaluated using three-dimensional computed tomography to assess emphysematous changes are strongly associated with postoperative respiratory complications. Herein, we investigated the relationship between low-attenuation area, the surgical procedure and resected lung volume, which has not been explored in previous studies. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with primary or metastatic lung cancer who underwent surgical resection. The low-attenuation area percentage (low-attenuation area/total lung area × 100) and resected lung volume were calculated using three-dimensional computed tomography software, and the relationship with postoperative respiratory complications was analysed. RESULTS: Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in 66 patients (17%) in the total cohort (n = 383). We set the median value of 1.1% as the cut-off value for low-attenuation area percentage to predict postoperative respiratory complications, which occurred in 24% and 10% of patients with low-attenuation area >1.1% and <1.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in approximately one-third of the patients with low-attenuation area >1.1%, whose resected lung volume was ≥15.8% or ≥5 resected subsegments. Multivariable analysis revealed that sublobar resection was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications in patients with low-attenuation area >1.1% (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.183-0.875). CONCLUSIONS: Emphysema is a risk factor for postoperative respiratory complications, and lobectomy is an independent predictive risk factor. Preserving more lung parenchyma may yield better short-term prognoses in patients with emphysematous lungs.

Treatable traits in advanced emphysema patients eligible for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced emphysema eligible for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) are characterized by severe static lung hyperinflation, which can be considered a treatable trait. Other treatable traits (TTs), which are assumed to be present in this highly selected patient group, have not been studied in detail nor how they may affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate a spectrum of TTs in COPD patients eligible for EBV treatment and their association with HRQL. METHODS: The SoLVE study (NCT03474471) was a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients receiving EBV. The presence/absence of 16 TTs was based on pre-defined thresholds. HRQL was assessed with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Subjects were stratified into two groups, using the median split method, into higher or lower SGRQ total score. Logistic regression assessed the odds ratio (OR) of having a higher SGRQ total score per TT. RESULTS: Ninety-seven subjects were included, the mean number of TTs per patient was 8.1 ± 2.5. Low physical activity (95%), poor exercise capacity (94%) and severe fatigue (75%) were the most prevalent TTs. The sum of TTs present in a subject was associated with the SGRQ total score (r = 0.53; p < 0.001). Severe fatigue, depression, and anxiety were predictors of having a higher SGRQ total score. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence and co-occurrence of multiple TTs were identified in emphysema patients eligible for EBV. Patients with a higher number of TTs were more likely to have worse HRQL.

Survival following lung volume reduction procedures: results from the UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry.

INTRODUCTION: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) placement can produce substantial benefits in appropriately selected people with emphysema. The UK Lung Volume Reduction (UKLVR) registry is a national multicentre observational study set up to support quality standards and assess outcomes from LVR procedures at specialist centres across the UK. METHODS: Data were analysed for all patients undergoing an LVR procedure (LVRS/EBV) who were recruited into the study at participating centres between January 2017 and June 2022, including; disease severity and risk assessment, compliance with guidelines for selection, procedural complications and survival to February 2023. RESULTS: Data on 541 patients from 14 participating centres were analysed. Baseline disease severity was similar in patients who had surgery n=244 (44.9%), or EBV placement n=219 (40.9%), for example, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 32.1 (12.1)% vs 31.2 (11.6)%. 89% of cases had discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting recorded. Median (IQR) length of stay postprocedure for LVRS and EBVs was 12 (13) vs 4 (4) days(p=0.01). Increasing age, male gender and lower FEV1%predicted were associated with mortality risk, but survival did not differ between the two procedures, with 50 (10.8%) deaths during follow-up in the LVRS group vs 45 (9.7%) following EBVs (adjusted HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.67) p=0.661) CONCLUSION: Based on data entered in the UKLVR registry, LVRS and EBV procedures for emphysema are being performed in people with similar disease severity and long-term survival is similar in both groups.

Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has proven an effective treatment for emphysema, by decreasing hyperinflation and improving lung function, activity level and reducing dyspnoea. However, postoperative air leak is an important complication, often leading to reoperation. Our aim was to analyse reoperations after LVRS and identify potential predictors. METHODS: Consecutive single-centre unilateral VATS LVRS performed from 2017 to 2022 were included. Typically, 3-5 minor resections were made using vascular magazines without buttressing. Data were obtained from an institutional database and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reoperation. Number and location of injuries were registered. RESULTS: In total, 191 patients were included, 25 were reoperated (13%). In 21 patients, the indication for reoperation was substantial air leak, 3 patients bleeding and 1 patient empyema. Length of stay (LOS) was 21 (11-33) vs. 5 days (3-11), respectively. Only 3 injuries were in the stapler line, 13 within < 2cm and 15 injuries were in another site. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that decreasing DLCO increased risk of reoperation, OR 1.1 (1.03, 1.18, P = 0.005). Resections in only one lobe, compared to resections in multiple lobes, were also a risk factor OR 3.10 (1.17, 9.32, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing reoperation had significantly increased 30-day mortality, OR 5.52 (1.03, 26.69, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our incidence of reoperation after LVRS was 13% leading to prolonged LOS and increased 30-day mortality. Low DLCO and resections in a single lobe were significant predictors of reoperation. The air leak was usually not localized in the stapler line.

Application of 3D computed tomography in emphysematous parenchyma patients scheduled for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a feasible, safe, effective and minimally invasive technique to significantly improve the quality of life of advanced severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) automatic analysis software combined with pulmonary function test (PFT) was used to retrospectively evaluate the postoperative efficacy of BLVR patients. The purpose is to evaluate the improvement of lung function of local lung tissue after operation, maximize the benefits of patients, and facilitate BLVR in the treatment of patients with advanced COPD. All the reported cases of advanced COPD patients treated with BLVR with one-way valve were collected and analysed from 2017 to 2020. Three-dimensional-CT image analysis software system was used to analyse the distribution of low-density areas <950 Hounsfield units in both lungs pre- and post- BLVR. Meanwhile, all patients performed standard PFT pre- and post-operation for retrospective analysis. We reported six patients that underwent unilateral BLVR with 1 to 3 valves according to the range of emphysema. All patients showed a median increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 34%, compared with baseline values. Hyperinflation was reduced by 16.6% (range, 4.9%-47.2%). The volumetric measurements showed a significant reduction in the treated lobe volume among these patients. Meanwhile, the targeted lobe volume changes were inversely correlated with change in FEV1/FEV1% in patients with heterogeneous emphysematous. We confirm that 3D-CT analysis can quantify the changes of lung volume, ventilation and perfusion, to accurately evaluate the distribution and improvement of emphysema and rely less on the observer.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in emphysema: a review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a substantial burden on the healthcare system and is currently considered the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Emphysema, as evidenced by severe air-trapping in patients with COPD, leads to significant dyspnea and morbidity. Lung volume reduction via surgery or minimally invasive endobronchial interventions are currently available, which improve lung function and quality of life. RECENT FINDINGS: Newer studies have noted a survival benefit in patients post bronchoscopic lung volume reduction vs. those subjected to standard of care. The presence of collateral ventilation is one of the most common impeding factors to placing endobronchial valves, and if placed, these patients might not achieve lobar atelectasis; however, there are newer modalities that are now available for patients with collateral ventilation which we have described. SUMMARY: Combining standard of care treatment that includes smoking cessation, bronchodilators, preventive care including vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation, and endobronchial treatment using various interventions in decreasing hyperinflation improves quality of life and may improve survival and hence significantly reduce the burden of COPD on healthcare.

[Recurrence of a Giant Emphysematous Bulla After Bullectomy:Report of a Case].

A 38-year-old male, he was diagnosed with a giant pulmonary bulla occupying 2/3 of the right thoracic cavity on chest computed tomography( CT). The preoperative pulmonary function was unfavorable, so bullectomy of right upper lobe with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery( VATS) was performed. The outpatient follow-up was completed at 6 months after surgery. However, one year and eleven months postoperatively, the patient returned to the clinic complaining of dyspnea. Chest X-ray and CT showed a recurrence of a giant emphysematous bulla in the right upper lobe. Two years and three months after the initial surgery, the recurrent giant bulla was resected by right upper lobectomy with VATS. About four years after the reoperation, no recurrence of giant pulmonary bulla has been seen. Although there are some reports on surgical treatment and results of giant pulmonary bulla, there are few reports on recurrent cases, so we report this case.

Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema.

COPD is a highly prevalent, chronic and irreversible obstructive airway disease without curative treatment. Standard therapeutic strategies, both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, have only limited effects on lung function parameters of patients with severe disease. Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, many patients with severe COPD still have a high burden of dyspnoea and a poor quality of life. If these patients have severe lung emphysema, with hyperinflation as the driver of symptoms and exercise intolerance, lung volume reduction may be an effective treatment with a significant impact on lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. Currently, different lung volume reduction approaches, both surgical and bronchoscopic, have shown encouraging results and have been implemented in COPD treatment recommendations. Nevertheless, choosing the optimal lung volume reduction strategy for an individual patient remains challenging. Moreover, there is still room for improving durability of effect and safety in all available procedures. Ongoing and innovative research is essential to push this field forwards. This review provides an overview of results and limitations of the current lung volume reduction options for patients with severe lung emphysema and hyperinflation.

Recent advances in bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for severe COPD patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a novel and effective treatment for a specific phenotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characterized by advanced emphysema with static lung hyperinflation and severe breathlessness. This review aims to provide an overview of the recent advances made in BLVR. RECENT FINDINGS: For achieving optimal outcomes with BLVR, patient selection and target lobe identification is crucial. BLVR has recently also been established to improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life in COPD patients falling outside the standard treatment criteria, including patients with moderate hyperinflation, chronic hypercapnic failure or with very low diffusion capacity. In a cluster analysis, target lobe characteristics like emphysema destruction, air trapping and perfusion were found to be important discriminators between responders and non-responders. A potential survival benefit has been demonstrated in BLVR-treated patients when compared to non-treated patients. Long-term outcomes showed sustained outcomes of BLVR; however, effects decline over time, probably due to disease progression. SUMMARY: BLVR using one-way endobronchial valves has become a guideline treatment offered in specialized intervention centres for a specific subgroup of COPD patients. Recent studies further characterize responders, describe extrapulmonary effects of BLVR and show positive long-term outcomes and a potential survival benefit.

Quantitative emphysema on computed tomography imaging of chest is a risk factor for prognosis of esophagectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

The low attenuation area percentage (LAA%) is gaining popularity. LAA% is an index of quantitative emphysema on computed tomography (CT) imaging of the chest. This study aims to retrospectively investigate whether preoperative LAA% is associated with postoperative prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled for esophagectomy. From January 2016 to March 2020, 105 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy via right thoracotomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A Synapse Vincent volume analyzer (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was used for measurement. The software automatically quantified LAA% using a threshold of less than - 950 Hounsfield units on CT images of lung regions. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed in univariable and multivariable forms. Estimates of the receiver operating curve are used to determine the cutoff value for death of LAA%, and the binary value is then inserted into Cox proportional hazard analyses. The preoperative LAA% cutoff value was ≥ 6.3%. Patients with a preoperative LAA% ≥6.3% had a significantly worse prognosis than those with a preoperative LAA% of < 6.3%. LAA% ≥6.3% (hazard ratio: 6.76; 95% confidence interval: 2.56-17.90, P < .001) was the most influential preoperative factor for overall survival after esophagectomy in multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. LAA% is one of the preoperative risk factors for survival after esophagectomy and an indicator of lung condition using routinely performed preoperative CT images. We quantified the extent of preoperative emphysema in patients with esophageal cancer, who were scheduled for surgery, and for the first time, reported LAA% as one of the preoperative risk factors for survival after esophagectomy.